Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 62, 2020 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31959113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the World Health Organization antibiotic regimen for the treatment of paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) leprosy compared to other available regimens. METHODS: We performed a search from 1982 to July 2018 without language restriction. We included randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials, and comparative observational studies (cohorts and case-control studies) that enrolled patients of any age with PB or MB leprosy that were treated with any of the leprosy antibiotic regimens established by the WHO in 1982 and used any other antimicrobial regimen as a controller. Primary efficacy outcomes included: complete clinical cure, clinical improvement of the lesions, relapse rate, treatment failure. Data were pooled using a random effects model to estimate the treatment effects reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We found 25 eligible studies, 11 evaluated patients with paucibacillary leprosy, while 13 evaluated patients with MB leprosy and 1 evaluated patients of both groups. Diverse regimen treatments and outcomes were studied. Complete cure at 6 months of multidrug therapy (MDT) in comparison to rifampin-ofloxacin-minocycline (ROM) found RR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.88-1.27) in five studies. Whereas six studies compare the same outcome at different follow up periods between 6 months and 5 years, according to the analysis ROM was not better than MDT (RR of 1.01 (95% CI 0.78-1.31)) in PB leprosy. CONCLUSION: Not better treatment than the implemented by the WHO was found. Diverse outcome and treatment regimens were studied, more statements to standardized the measurements of outcomes are needed.


Assuntos
Hansenostáticos/uso terapêutico , Hanseníase Multibacilar/tratamento farmacológico , Hanseníase Paucibacilar/tratamento farmacológico , Minociclina/uso terapêutico , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Protocolos Clínicos , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hansenostáticos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minociclina/efeitos adversos , Mycobacterium leprae/efeitos dos fármacos , Mycobacterium leprae/isolamento & purificação , Doenças Negligenciadas/tratamento farmacológico , Ofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Rifampina/efeitos adversos , Falha de Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(4): 483-494.e11, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712606

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of apneic oxygenation during emergency intubation. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid CENTRAL, and Scopus databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies from 2006 until July 2016, without language restrictions. Gray literature, clinicaltrials.gov, and reference lists of articles were hand searched. We conducted a meta-analysis with random-effects models to evaluate first-pass success rates, incidence of hypoxemia, and lowest peri-intubation SpO2 between apneic oxygenation and standard oxygenation cases. RESULTS: A total of 1,386 studies were screened and 77 selected for full-text review. A total of 14 studies were included for qualitative analysis, and 8 studies (1,837 patients) underwent quantitative analysis. In the meta-analysis of 8 studies (1,837 patients), apneic oxygenation was associated with decreased hypoxemia (odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.84), but was not associated with decreased severe hypoxemia (6 studies; 1,043 patients; OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.57) or life-threatening hypoxemia (5 studies; 1,003 patients; OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.55). Apneic oxygenation was associated with increased first-pass success rate (6 studies; 1,658 patients; OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.44) and increased lowest peri-intubation SpO2 (6 studies; 1,043 patients; weighted mean difference 2.2%; 95% CI 0.8% to 3.6%). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, apneic oxygenation was associated with increased peri-intubation oxygen saturation, decreased rates of hypoxemia, and increased first-pass intubation success.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Hipóxia/prevenção & controle , Intubação Intratraqueal , Laringoscopia/métodos , Oxigenoterapia , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA