RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of an unprecedented COVID-19 antigen testing program in schools, which required a healthcare provider order, laboratory director, a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments certificate of waiver, as well as training of school personnel. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive report of a point-of-care, school-based antigen testing program in California from August 1st, 2021 through May 30, 2022, in which participants grades K-12 self-swabbed and school personnel performed testing. Participants included 944 009 students, personnel, and community members from 4022 California kindergarten through high schools. Outcomes measured include sensitivity and specificity (with polymerase chain reaction [PCR] as comparator) of the Abbott BinaxNOW antigen test, number of tests performed, and active infections identified. RESULTS: Of 102 022 paired PCR/antigen tests, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the antigen test was 81.2% (95% CI: 80.5%-81.8%) and 99.6% (95% CI: 99.5%-99.6%), respectively, using cycle threshold values <30. During January through March 2022, the highest prevalence period, the positive predictive value of antigen testing was 94.7% and the negative predictive value was 94.2%. Overall, 4022 school sites were enrolled and 3 987 840 million antigen tests were performed on 944 009 individuals. A total of 162 927 positive antigen tests were reported in 135 163 individuals (14.3% of persons tested). CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly implementing a school-based testing program in thousands of schools is feasible. Self-swabbing and testing by school personnel can yield accurate results. On-site COVID-19 testing is no longer necessary in schools, but this model provides a framework for future infectious disease threats.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To inform approaches to pediatric medical traumatic stress (PMTS) by exploring providers' (1) perception of the impact of PMTS on the medical care of patients with pediatric-onset chronic illnesses, (2) self-reported competencies and practices of PMTS prevention, treatment, and counseling, and (3) perception of the barriers influencing the adoption of these practices. STUDY DESIGN: A convenience sample of multidisciplinary healthcare providers was recruited through a multimodal recruitment strategy to participate in an electronic survey adapted from the Trauma-Informed Care Provider Survey. RESULTS: Among participants (n = 304), 99% agreed that PMTS impacts patient health. Participants report altering medical care plans due to PMTS, including deferring or stopping treatments (n = 98 [32%]) and changing medication regimens (n = 88 [29%]). Sixty-eight percent (n = 208) report negative impact of PMTS on patient implementation of medical care plans, including medication nonadherence (n = 153 [50%]) and missed appointments (n = 119 [39%]). Although participants agreed it is their job to decrease patient stress (n = 292 [96%]) and perform PMTS assessments (n = 268 [88%]), few practiced PMTS-focused trauma informed care. Systems-level barriers to practice included insufficient training, absent clinical workflows, and lack of access to mental health experts. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have helped inform a conceptual framework for understanding the relationship between PMTS and health outcomes. Systems-level opportunities to optimize PMTS-focused trauma-informed care include (1) dissemination of provider training, (2) integrated workflows for PMTS mitigation, and (3) enhanced accessibility to mental health providers. Further work is required to determine if these interventions can improve health outcomes in patients with pediatric-onset chronic illnesses.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Criança , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Autorrelato , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of US children hospitalized for a primary mental health condition who are discharged to postacute care (PAC); whether PAC discharge is associated with demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics; and whether PAC use varies by state. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of a nationally representative sample of US acute care hospitalizations for children ages 2-20 years with a primary mental health diagnosis, using the 2009 and 2012 Kids' Inpatient Databases. Discharge to PAC was used as a proxy for transfer to an inpatient mental health facility. We derived adjusted logistic regression models to assess the association of patient and hospital characteristics with discharge to PAC. RESULTS: In 2012, 14.7% of hospitalized children (n = 248 359) had a primary mental health diagnosis. Among these, 72% (n = 178 214) had bipolar disorder, depression, or psychosis, of whom 4.9% (n = 8696) were discharged to PAC. The strongest predictors of PAC discharge were homicidal ideation (aOR, 24.9; 96% CI, 4.1-150.4), suicide and self-injury (aOR, 15.1; 95% CI, 11.7-19.4), and substance abuse-related medical illness (aOR, 5.0; 95% CI, 4.5-5.6). PAC use varied widely by state, ranging from 2.2% to 36.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of children hospitalized primarily for a mood disorder or psychosis were not discharged to PAC, and safety-related conditions were the primary drivers of the relatively few PAC discharges. There was substantial state-to-state variation. Target areas for quality improvement include improving access to PAC for children hospitalized for mood disorders or psychosis and equitable allocation of appropriate PAC resources across states.