RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pyloroplasty is an effective surgery for gastroparesis. However, some patients fail to improve after pyloric drainage and may require subsequent gastric electric stimulation. There is a paucity of data on the efficacy of gastric stimulator as an adjunct to failed pyloroplasty. This study aimed to describe our experience with pyloroplasty, determine the efficacy of gastric stimulator for failed pyloroplasty, and compare the final outcomes of those who required pyloroplasty with and without gastric stimulator for gastroparesis. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent primary pyloroplasty for gastroparesis at our institution were reviewed. Patients with poor symptomatic improvement after pyloroplasty underwent subsequent gastric stimulator. Symptoms were assessed using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) preoperatively and after each surgery. Severe gastroparesis was defined as GCSI total score ≥3. Outcomes were assessed after pyloroplasty in all patients and after stimulator in patients who failed pyloroplasty. Final outcomes were then compared between those who did and did not require adjunct gastric stimulator. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 104 patients (89.4% females) with a mean (SD) age of 42.2 years (11) and body mass index of 26.9 kg/m2 (7). Gastroparesis etiologies were 71.2% idiopathic, 17.3% diabetic, and 11.5% postsurgical. At 18.7 months (12) after pyloroplasty, there was a decrease in the GCSI total score (3.5 [1] to 2.7 [1.2]; P = .0012) and the rate of severe gastroparesis (71.9%-29.3%; P < .0001). Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) 4-hour retention decreased (36.5 [24] to 15.3 [18]; P = .0003). Adjunct gastric stimulator was required by 30 patients (28.8%) owing to suboptimal outcomes with no improvement in GCSI (P = .201) or GES (P = .320). These patients were younger (40.5 [10.6] vs 49.6 [15.2] years; P = .0016), with higher baseline GCSI total scores (4.3 [0.7] vs 3.7 [1.1]; P < .001) and more severe gastroparesis (100% vs 55.6%; P < .001). All other preoperative characteristics were similar. At 21.7 months (15) after gastric stimulator, there was improvement in GCSI (4.1 [0.7] to 2.6 [1.1]; P < .0001), severe gastroparesis (100%-33.3%; P < .0001), and GES 4-hour retention (21.2 [22] to 7.6 [10]; P = .054). Before gastric stimulator, those who failed pyloroplasty had significantly worse GCSI (P = .0009) and GES (P = .048). However, after gastric stimulator, GCSI and GES improved and were comparable with those who only required pyloroplasty (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Pyloroplasty improved gastroparesis symptoms and gastric emptying, yet 28% failed, requiring gastric stimulator. Younger patients and those with preoperative GCSI scores ≥3 were more likely to fail. Gastric stimulator improved outcomes after failed pyloroplasty, with comparable final GCSI and GES with those who did not fail.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device sizing protocols on postoperative outcomes and dysphagia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Among predictors of dysphagia after MSA, device size is the only factor that may be modified. Many centers have adopted protocols to increase device size. However, there is limited data on the impact of MSA device upsizing protocols on the surgical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent MSA were implanted with 2 or 3-beads above the sizing device's pop-off point (POP). Clinical and objective outcomes >1-year after surgery were compared between patients implanted with POP+2-vs-POP+3 sizing protocols. Multiple subgroups were analyzed for benefit from upsizing. Pre- and postoperative characteristics were compared between size patients received, regardless of protocol. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients were implanted under POP+2 and 216 under POP+3. At a mean of 14.2(7.9) months pH normalization was 73.6% and 34.1% required dilation, 15.9% developed persistent dysphagia, and 4.0% required removal. Sizing protocol had no impact on persistent dysphagia ( P =0.908), pH normalization ( P =0.822), or need for dilation ( P =0.210) or removal ( P =0.191). Subgroup analysis found that upsizing reduced dysphagia in patients with <80 percent peristalsis (10.3-vs-31%, P =0.048) or DCI >5000 (0-vs-30.4%, P =0.034). Regardless of sizing protocol, as device size increased there was a stepwise increase in percent male sex ( P <0.0001), BMI>30 ( P <0.0001), and preoperative hiatal hernia>3 cm ( P <0.0001), LA grade C/D esophagitis ( P <0.0001), and DeMeester score ( P <0.0001). Increased size was associated with decreased pH-normalization ( P <0.0001) and need for dilation ( P =0.043) or removal ( P =0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Upsizing from POP+2 to POP+3 does not reduce dysphagia or affect other MSA outcomes; however, patients with poor peristalsis or hypercontractile esophagus do benefit. Regardless of sizing protocol, preoperative clinical characteristics varied among device sizes, suggesting size is not a modifiable factor, but a surrogate for esophageal circumference.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies show higher rates of dissatisfaction with antireflux surgery (ARS) outcomes in patients with chronic constipation. This suggests a relationship between colonic dysmotility and suboptimal surgical outcome. However, due to limitations in technology, there is no objective data available examining this relationship. The wireless motility capsule (WMC) is a novel technology consisting of an ingestible capsule equipped with pH, temperature, and pressure sensors, which provide information regarding regional and whole gut transit times, pH and motility. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of objective regional and whole gut motility data on the outcomes of ARS. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent WMC testing before ARS. Transit times, motility, and pH data obtained from different gastrointestinal tract regions were used in analysis to determine factors that impact surgical outcome. A favorable outcome was defined as complete resolution of the predominant reflux symptom and freedom from antisecretory medications. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 48 patients (fundoplication [n = 29] and magnetic sphincter augmentation [n = 19]). Of those patients, 87.5% were females and the mean age ± SD was 51.8 ± 14.5 years. At follow-up (mean ± SD, 16.8 ± 13.2 months), 87.5% of all patients achieved favorable outcomes. Patients with unfavorable outcomes had longer mean whole gut transit times (92.0 hours vs 55.7 hours; p = 0.024) and colonic transit times (78.6 hours vs 47.3 hours; p = 0.028), higher mean peak colonic pH (8.8 vs 8.15; p = 0.009), and higher mean antral motility indexes (310 vs 90.1; p = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that objective colonic dysmotility leads to suboptimal outcomes after ARS. WMC testing can assist with preoperative risk assessment and counseling for patients seeking ARS.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Trânsito Gastrointestinal , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Colo/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry. BACKGROUND: MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology. METHODS: Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P < 0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P < 0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P < 0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P < 0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged ( P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance.
Assuntos
Líquidos Corporais , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Humanos , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Impedância Elétrica , Monitoramento do pH EsofágicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The performance and durability of various types of fundoplication are variable when stratified by disease severity. To date, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been evaluated in this context. We designed this study to determine the efficacy of MSA in the treatment of severe GERD. STUDY DESIGN: Guided by previous studies, a DeMeester score (DMS) ≥ 50 was used as a cutoff point to define severe reflux disease. Subjects were divided into 2 groups using this cutoff, and outcomes of severe cases were compared with those with less severe disease (DMS < 50). RESULTS: A total of 334 patients underwent MSA. Patients with severe disease had a higher mean preoperative DMS compared with those with mild to moderate GERD (79.2 [53.2] vs 22.8 [13.7], p < 0.0001). At a mean postoperative follow-up of 13.6 (10.4) months, there was no difference between the mean GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) total scores in patients with severe disease compared with those with less severe GERD (8.8 [10] vs 9.2 [10.8], p = 0.9204). Postoperative mean DMS was not different between groups (17.3[23.0] vs 14.1[33.9], p = 0.71), and there was no difference in the prevalence of esophagitis (p = 0.52). Patients with severe disease were less likely to be free from use of proton pump inhibitors after surgery (85% vs 93.1%, p = 0.041). There were similar rates of postoperative dysphagia (10% vs 14%, p = 0.42) and need for device removal (3% vs 5%, p = 0.7463). CONCLUSIONS: MSA is an effective treatment in patients with severe GERD and leads to significant clinical improvement across the spectrum of disease severity, with few objective outcomes being superior in patients with mild-to-moderate reflux disease.
Assuntos
Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior/cirurgia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Imãs , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fundoplicatura , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising surgical treatment for patients with GERD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of MSA in a large cohort of patients with GERD and to determine the factors predicting a favorable outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 553 patients who underwent MSA at our institution in a 5-year period. Preoperative clinical, endoscopic, manometric, and pH data were used in a univariate analysis. This was followed by a regression multivariable analysis to determine the factors predicting a favorable outcome. Favorable outcome was defined as freedom from proton pump inhibitors and ≥50% improvement in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) total score. RESULTS: At a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.3 (10.6) months after MSA, 92.7% of the patients were free of proton pump inhibitor use and 84% reported at least 50% improvement in their GERD-HRQL total score. The GERD-HRQL total score was improved from a mean (SD) baseline value of 33.8 (18.7) to 7.2 (9.0) (p < 0.001) and 76.1% of the patients had normalization of their esophageal acid exposure. Independent predictors of a favorable outcome after MSA included age younger than 45 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 15.2; p = 0.0305), male sex (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.7; p = 0.0301), GERD-HRQL total score >15 (OR 7.5; 95% CI, 3.3 to 16.8; p < 0.0001), and abnormal DeMeester score (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.7; p = 0.0225). CONCLUSIONS: In this largest single-institution series, we demonstrate that MSA implantation is associated with very good clinical and objective outcomes. Age younger than 45 years, male sex, GERD-HRQL total score >15, and abnormal DeMeester score are the 4 preoperative factors predicting a favorable outcome and can be used in patient counseling and MSA use.