RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Information is lacking on the effects of hormone replacement therapy in women with diabetes, especially during moderate chronic hyperglycemia. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of HRT on the lipid profile and the low density lipoprotein subclass distribution in women with type 2 diabetes under satisfactory and non-satisfactory glycemic control. METHODS: Fifty-four postmenopausal women after a 6 week run-in diet were randomized to receive either placebo (HbA1c < 8%, n = 13; HbA1c > 8%, n = 17) or HRT (HbA1c < 8%, n = 11; HbA1c > 8%, n = 13) for 12 weeks. HRT consisted of cyclical conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg/day plus medrogestone 5 mg/day. At the beginning and at the end of each treatment period the LDL subclass distribution was estimated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. RESULTS: At the baseline and during the study, the HbA1c level was significantly higher in hyperglycemic patients than in the near-normoglycemic controls (baseline 10.2 +/- 2.9 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.7%, P < 0.01). They showed a trend for higher total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and lower high density lipoprotein-cholesterol compared to near-normoglycemic controls, as well as significantly higher triglyceride concentrations in very low density lipoprotein, intermediate density lipoprotein and LDL-1 particles and cholesterol content in LDL-1 and -2 particles. HRT decreased LDL-cholesterol in both groups. In the normoglycemic patients a small increase in HbA1c was observed (6.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 7.4 +/- 1%, P = 0.04). In all cases, HRT did not modify the proportion of LDL represented by denser LDLs. CONCLUSIONS: HRT did not modify the LDL subclass distribution, even in the presence of moderate chronic hyperglycemia in women with type 2 diabetes.
Assuntos
Apolipoproteínas B/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/administração & dosagem , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Lipoproteínas LDL/efeitos dos fármacos , Medrogestona/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Apolipoproteínas B/análise , Glicemia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglicemia/etiologia , Lipoproteínas LDL/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Probabilidade , Valores de Referência , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of secondary failures to sulphonylurea-metformin therapy, its comparison against bedtime NPH insulin, and to measure the changes in postprandial metabolism resulting from both treatments. METHODS: One hundred type 2 diabetic patients in a secondary failure were included. The study begun with a run-in diet period of 6 weeks, in which an isocaloric diet was prescribed. Only subjects who continued hyperglycaemic were randomly assigned to placebo and acarbose (n = 17) or bedtime NPH insulin (n = 12). Acarbose (300 mg/day) or placebo were administered using a randomized, double blind, crossover design. Treatment periods of 3 months were separated by a 3-week washout period. Insulin was administered during 3 months. At the beginning and the end of each treatment period, an i.v. glucose tolerance test and a meal test were performed. Safety tests were done every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Acarbose resulted in a small but significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose (13.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 11.3 +/- 3.9 mmol/l, p = 0.05), HbA1c (11.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 10.3 +/- 2.5%, P = 0.3) and in a decreased plasma glucose during the meal test. Bedtime insulin significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose (13.1 +/- 2.9 vs. 8.2 +/- 2.3 mmol/l, p < 0.01), HbA1c (11.7 +/- 2.9 vs. 9.4 +/- 2.7%, p < 0.01) and plasma cholesterol. No change in insulin secretion resulted from insulin and acarbose treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose decreases blood glucose in secondary failure to sulphonylurea-metformin therapy; however, the decrease is not enough to reach the desired metabolic control. Bedtime NPH insulin is, by far, a more effective alternative.