RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the effects of adenotonsillectomy (AT) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and compare volumetric changes in the upper airway (UA) arising from AT and RME. METHODS: Thirty-nine children who presented with maxillary constriction and grade III/IV tonsillar hypertrophy were randomized into two groups. One group underwent AT as the first treatment, and the other group underwent RME. Polysomnography (PSG) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were conducted before (T0) and 6 months after the first treatment (T1). In a crossover design, individuals with AHI>1 received the second treatment. Six months later, they underwent PSG and CBCT (T2). The influence of age, sex, tonsil and adenoid hypertrophy, initial AHI severity, initial volume of the UA, first treatment, and maxillary expansion amount was evaluated using linear regression analysis. Intra- and inter-group comparisons for AHI and inter-group comparisons of volumetric changes in each region of the UA were performed using a paired t-test and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The initial AHI severity and therapeutic sequence in which AT was the first treatment explained for 95.6% of AHI improvement. AT caused significant improvements in the AHI and volumetric increases in the buccopharynx and total UA areas compared to RME. CONCLUSIONS: The initial AHI severity and AT as the first treatment accounted for most of the AHI improvement. Most reductions in AHI were due to AT, which promoted more volumetric increases in UA areas than RME. RME may have a marginal effect on pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, by means of cephalometric appraisal, the vertical effects of non-extraction treatment of adult anterior open bite with clear aligners (Invisalign system, Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 30 adult patients with anterior open bite treated using Invisalign (22 females, 8 males; mean age at start of treatment: 28 years and 10 months; mean anterior open bite at start of treatment: 1.8 mm) were analyzed. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were traced to compare the following vertical measurements: SN to maxillary occlusal plane (SN-MxOP), SN to mandibular occlusal plane (SN-MnOP), mandibular plane to mandibular occlusal plane (MP-MnOP), SN to mandibular plane (SN-MP), SN to palatal plane (SN-PP), SN to gonion-gnathion plane (SN-GoGn), upper 1 tip to palatal plane (U1-PP), lower 1 tip to mandibular plane (L1-MP), mesiobuccal cusp of upper 6 to palatal plane (U6-PP), mesiobuccal cusp of lower 6 to mandibular plane (L6-MP), lower anterior facial height (LAFH), and overbite (OB). Paired t-tests and descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze the data and assess any significant changes resulting from treatment. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in overall treatment changes for SN-MxOP, SN-MnOP, MP-MnOP, SN-MP, SN-GoGn, L1-MP, L6-MP, LAFH, and OB. CONCLUSIONS: The Invisalign system is a viable therapeutic modality for non-extraction treatment of adult anterior mild open bites. Bite closure was mainly achieved by a combination of counterclockwise rotation of the mandibular plane, lower molar intrusion and lower incisor extrusion.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, by means of cephalometric appraisal, the vertical effects of non-extraction treatment of adult anterior open bite with clear aligners (Invisalign system, Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Methods: Lateral cephalograms of 30 adult patients with anterior open bite treated using Invisalign (22 females, 8 males; mean age at start of treatment: 28 years and 10 months; mean anterior open bite at start of treatment: 1.8 mm) were analyzed. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were traced to compare the following vertical measurements: SN to maxillary occlusal plane (SN-MxOP), SN to mandibular occlusal plane (SN-MnOP), mandibular plane to mandibular occlusal plane (MP-MnOP), SN to mandibular plane (SN-MP), SN to palatal plane (SN-PP), SN to gonion-gnathion plane (SN-GoGn), upper 1 tip to palatal plane (U1-PP), lower 1 tip to mandibular plane (L1-MP), mesiobuccal cusp of upper 6 to palatal plane (U6-PP), mesiobuccal cusp of lower 6 to mandibular plane (L6-MP), lower anterior facial height (LAFH), and overbite (OB). Paired t-tests and descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze the data and assess any significant changes resulting from treatment. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in overall treatment changes for SN-MxOP, SN-MnOP, MP-MnOP, SN-MP, SN-GoGn, L1-MP, L6-MP, LAFH, and OB. Conclusions: The Invisalign system is a viable therapeutic modality for non-extraction treatment of adult anterior mild open bites. Bite closure was mainly achieved by a combination of counterclockwise rotation of the mandibular plane, lower molar intrusion and lower incisor extrusion.

RESUMO Objetivo: o objetivo desse estudo foi realizar uma avaliação cefalométrica dos efeitos verticais do tratamento sem extração de mordidas abertas anteriores em adultos com o uso de alinhadores (sistema Invisalign, Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, EUA). Métodos: foram analisados cefalogramas laterais de 30 pacientes adultos com mordida aberta anterior, tratados com o sistema Invisalign (22 do sexo feminino, 8 do sexo masculino, com idade média ao início do tratamento de 28 anos e 10 meses, e mordida aberta anterior média igual a 1,8mm). Os cefalogramas pré- e pós-tratamento foram traçados e as seguintes medidas verticais foram avaliadas: SN ao plano oclusal maxilar (SN-MxOP), SN ao plano oclusal mandibular (SN-MnOP), plano mandibular ao plano oclusal mandibular (MP-MnOP), SN ao plano mandibular (SN-MP), SN ao plano palatino (SN-PP), SN ao plano gônio-gnátio (SN-GoGn), incisivo central superior ao plano palatino (U1-PP), incisivo central inferior ao plano mandibular (L1-MP), cúspide mesiovestibular do molar superior ao plano palatino (U6-PP), cúspide mesiovestibular do molar inferior ao plano mandibular (L6-MP), altura facial anterior inferior (AFAI) e sobremordida (OB). Testes t pareados e estatística descritiva foram utilizados para analisar os dados e as alterações significativas resultantes do tratamento. Resultados: foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas durante o tratamento para SN-MxOP, SN-MnOP, MP-MnOP, SN-MP, SN-GoGn, L1-MP, L6-MP, AFAI e OB. Conclusões: o sistema Invisalign é uma modalidade terapêutica viável para o tratamento sem extração de mordidas abertas anteriores em pacientes adultos. O fechamento da mordida foi obtido principalmente por uma combinação de rotação do plano mandibular no sentido anti-horário, intrusão molar inferior e extrusão do incisivo inferior.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate immediate soft tissue changes following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in growing patients, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients (10 male, 13 female) treated by RME were selected. Patients were scanned using CBCT prior to placement of the rapid maxillary expander (T0), then immediately following full activation of the appliance (T1). Defined landmarks were then located on the pre- and post-treatment orientated images. Change in landmark position from pre- to post-treatment was then measured. In addition to landmarks, 10 direct measures were made to determine distance change without regard to direction to measure soft tissue change of the lips. RESULTS: Significant transverse expansion was measured on most soft tissue landmark locations. All the measures made showed significant change in the lip position with a lengthening of the vertical dimension of the upper lip, and a generalized decrease of anterior-posterior thickness of both the upper and lower lips. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes in the soft tissue do occur with RME treatment. There is a transverse widening of the midface, and a thinning of the lips.

OBJETIVO: avaliar as mudanças imediatas no tecido mole após a expansão rápida da maxila (ERM) em pacientes em fase de crescimento, usando tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC). MÉTODOS: vinte e três pacientes (10 do sexo masculino e 13 do feminino) tratados com ERM foram selecionados. Os pacientes foram escaneados por TCFC antes da implantação do expansor maxilar (T0) e imediatamente após a completa ativação do aparelho (T1). Pontos cefalométricos definidos foram localizados nas imagens pré- e pós-tratamento. As mudanças de posição desses pontos do pré- para o pós-tratamento foram, então, analisadas. Adicionalmente aos pontos, 10 medições diretas foram realizadas para determinar a mudança nas distâncias - independentemente da direção - nos tecidos moles dos lábios. RESULTADOS: uma expansão transversal significativa foi notada na maioria dos pontos demarcados em tecido mole. Todas as medições apresentaram mudança significativa na posição labial, com um aumento da dimensão vertical do lábio superior e uma redução generalizada da espessura anteroposterior dos lábios inferior e superior. CONCLUSÃO: de fato, mudanças significativas do tecido mole ocorrem no tratamento com ERM. Há um alargamento transversal do terço médio da face e um afinamento dos lábios.

RESUMO

A abordagem clínica não-cirúrgica da Classe III coloca-se entre os grandes desafios da Ortodontia e vem, desde sempre, gerando controvérsia entre clínicos e pesquisadores. Alguns defendem a tese de que o crescimento e o desenvolvimento do complexo craniofacial são determinados geneticamente e, portanto, inalteráveis. Para esses, a correção da grande maioria de casos de Classe III passará por intervenções orto-cirúrgicas, devendo a terapia ser realizada assim que cessar o período mais ativo do crescimento. Por outro lado, há aqueles que, mesmo concordando com o peso da hereditariedade na etiologia da Classe III, acreditam ser possível modificar o padrão e a direção do crescimento e, através de uma abordagem não-cirúrgica, minimizar a má oclusão ou até mesmo tratá-la com sucesso. Em face da controvérsia, quais seriam as possibilidades ortodônticas? Inúmeros são os relatos de que uma intervenção adequada, em momento adequado, acompanhada de um estudo do padrão familiar, pode, muitas vezes, minimizar o desenvolvimento de uma Classe III. Procedimentos selecionados com critério podem reduzir a indicação de intervenções cirúrgicas e proporcionar resultados positivos e duradouros. Há evidências clínicas e científicas de que algumas decisões terapêuticas podem mudar o curso de muitos prognósticos sombrios.

Orthodontic management of the Class III malocclusion has been a constant challenge to the orthodontic profession and remains a controversial issue among clinicians and researches. Some support the belief that growth and size of the craniofacial complex are genetically predetermined and cannot be changed. They assume that the great majority of Class III cases are "untreatable" and that they are due to surgical intervention after growth has been completed. Even agreeing that heredity plays a major role in this type os deviation, others support the contention that the pattern and direction of growth can be modified and that forces generated in orthodontic treatment are able to minimize and even successfully correct some Class III. The controversy is real and one question is still to be answered: How much can orthodontics really do? The literature provides enough support that appropriate interventions at the adequate time, accompanied by a family growth study may very well minimize or camouflage the Class III to acceptable and stable results without a surgical intervention. There are clinical and scientific evidences that selected procedures can change questionable prognosis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Patients with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors may seek treatment from an orthodontist for several reasons; unpleasant smile, dental arch disharmony, and midline deviations are among the most frequent complaints. Orthodontists and prosthodontists have raised important questions about the esthetics, occlusion, periodontal health, and psychological conditions noted in these patients. The decision to open lateral incisor spaces for prosthetics or close spaces by mesial movement of the canines requires a careful diagnosis and comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment planning. The purpose of this article is to present a diagnostic protocol to assist in the decision-making process, while analyzing patients with absent maxillary lateral incisors. The basis for a sound diagnosis and an effective treatment plan resides in careful consideration of the facial and dental characteristics of each patient. All information gathered during the clinical examination should be added to data obtained with other diagnostic tools, such as cephalometric analysis and orthodontic waxups, to achieve the treatment option that best suits the patient's expectations.

Assuntos