RESUMO
The aim of this work was to perform a dosimetric evaluation of two cone-beam computed tomography scanners. The study was performed with two scanners: i-CAT classic and PreXion 3D. Air kerma-area product (PKA) was measured for all full-arch dental implant planning protocols. Surface air kerma was also estimated at the region of the eyes, salivary glands and thyroid using thermoluminescence dosemeters positioned on an anthropomorphic phantom. The PKA values for the i-CAT classic ranged from 24 to 180 µGy m(2) and, for the PreXion, from 70 to 138 µGy m(2). The large variation of these values was mainly caused by acquisition time and field of views. The surface air kerma values were from 0.08 to 3.39 mGy at the eyes, 0.50 to 3.96 mGy at the parotids, 0.11 to 2.95 mGy at the submandibular glands and 0.05 to 1.32 mGy at the thyroid. These values are comparable with those found in the literature.
Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Implantes Dentários , Radiometria/métodos , Ar , Algoritmos , Antropometria , Brasil , Calibragem , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Doses de Radiação , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Dosimetria Termoluminescente , Tomógrafos ComputadorizadosRESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality of 29 computed tomography (CT) scanners in Brazil and to perform estimations of patient dose and image quality of common CT examinations at these equipment. The volume CT air kerma indexes (C(VOL)) were estimated, using normalised weighted air kerma indexes, supplied by the ImPACT group. The image quality tests were performed using the phantom and accreditation protocol from the American College of Radiology (ACR). The C(VOL) values for head scans varied between 8.7 and 108 mGy. The Hi-res chest examinations presented C(VOL) values varying from 0.4 to 32 mGy. For abdominal scans, the estimated C(VOL) values varied between 4.1 and 94 mGy. This wide variation of air kerma between different centres is related to the scanner type and also to the scanning parameters. The results also showed that the image quality did not attend all ACR CT accreditation requirements.