RESUMO

Adverse events (AEs), and particularly adverse drug events (ADEs), represent a health problem as they can cause permanent damage or death. Understanding the frequency, location, and causes of ADEs can prevent harm to patients. The Global Trigger Tool, produced by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (GTT/IHI), is widely used to identify AEs. Recognizing the profile of patients who suffer ADEs can reveal clinical or individual characteristics that predispose to the occurrence of AEs. A cross-sectional study was carried out through a retrospective analysis of 120 medical charts of patients discharged from hospital between October 2020 and April 2021. Patients over 18 years old, with a length of stay of more than 24 h, were included. The list of triggers used was from the medication module of the GTT/IHI, which was adapted for use in the institution. Two primary reviewers and a medical reviewer applied this tool. The primary reviewers independently assessed the randomized charts. A meeting to achieve consensus among the reviewers was held every 2 weeks to validate the identified ADEs; classifications were based on harm severity. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to assess the variables that predicted the occurrence of ADEs, using the backward stepwise method. A total of 43 ADEs were identified, with a frequency of 36 per 100 admissions (43/120). Of these, five ADEs (12%) were responsible for patients being admitted to hospital. In the case of in-hospital ADEs, there were 42.2 per 1000 patients/day. The clinical manifestation of altered kidney function (16%) and the anatomical drug group of the nervous system (33%) were the most frequent ADEs. The multivariate logistic regression model was significant (×2 = 44.960, P < .001), indicating that factors such as: known drug allergy [odds ratio 5.728; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.249, 26.274, P = .025]; being clinically hospitalized (odds ratio 7.504; 95% CI: 1.654, 34.037; P = .009); number of medicines used (odds ratio 1.100; 95% CI: 1.054, 1.148; P < .001); and being under the care of internal medicine (odds ratio 3.633; 95% CI: 1.257, 10.511; P = .017) were predictor variables associated with the occurrence of ADEs. A significant percentage of hospitalized patients experienced at least one ADE, with rates surpassing those found in similar studies. The GTT/IHI effectively assessed medication-related harm, emphasizing the need for tailored triggers based on population characteristics. Predictor variables can inform preventive strategies. Overall, the tool facilitated a localized risk assessment of medication use.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Data is scarce regarding adverse events (AE) of biological therapy used in the management of Crohn's Disease (CD) among Brazilian patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyse AE prevalence and profile in patients with CD treated with Infliximab (IFX) or Adalimumab (ADA) and to verify whether there are differences between the two drugs. METHOD: Retrospective observational single-centre study of CD patients on biological therapy. Variables analysed: Demographic data, Montreal classification, biological agent administered, treatment duration, presence and type of AE and the need for treatment interruption. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were analysed, 25 treated with ADA and 24 with IFX. The groups were homogeneous in relation to the variables studied. The average follow-up period for the group treated with ADA was 19.3 months and 21.8 months for the IFX group (p = 0.585). Overall, 40% (n = 10) of patients taking ADA had AE compared with 50% (n = 12) of IFX users (p = 0.571). There was a tendency towards higher incidence of cutaneous and infusion reactions in the IFX group and higher incidence of infections in the ADA treated group, although without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in the AE prevalence and profile between ADA and IFX CD patients in the population studied. (AU)

INTRODUÇÃO: Há poucos dados sobre os eventos adversos (EA) da terapia biológica usada no tratamento da doença de Crohn (DC) entre os pacientes brasileiros. OBJETIVOS: Analisar a prevalência dos EA e o perfil dos pacientes com DC tratados com Infliximabe (IFX) ou Adalimumabe (ADA) e verificar se há diferenças entre esses dois fármacos. MÉTODO: Estudo observacional e retrospectivo de pacientes com DC em terapia biológica, realizado em centro único. As variáveis analisadas foram: dados demográficos, classificação de Montreal, agente biológico administrado, duração do tratamento, presença e tipo de EA e necessidade de interrupção do tratamento. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e nove pacientes foram analisados, 25 tratados com ADA e 24 com IFX. Os grupos eram homogêneos em relação às variáveis estudadas. O período médio de acompanhamento foi de 19,3 meses para o grupo tratado com ADA e de 21,8 meses para o grupo tratado com IFX (p = 0,585). No total, 40% dos pacientes (n = 10) que receberam ADA tiveram AE, em comparação com 50% dos pacientes (n = 12) que receberam IFX (p = 0,571). Houve uma maior incidência de reação cutânea e à infusão no grupo IFX e de infecções no grupo ADA, embora sem diferença significativa. CONCLUSÃO: Não houve diferença na prevalência de EA e no perfil dos pacientes com DC que receberam ADA e IFX. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: Ultrasound tissue characterization (USTC) is a precursor of ultrasound virtual histology (USVH), already applied to B-mode images of coronary, carotid, and peripheral arteries, as well as venous thrombosis. Elevated echogenicity has been described for a rejected transplanted kidney. We analyzed data from healthy young adults as reference for further renal USTC. METHODS: Ultrasound kidney images of 10 volunteers were analyzed. Pixel brightness in the 0-to-255 range was rescaled to zero for black and 200 for fascia brightness before automatic classification into 14 ranges, including "blood-like" (0-4), "fat-like" (8-26), "hypoechoic muscle-like" (41-60), "hyperechoic muscle-like" (61-76), 4 ranges of "fiber-like" (112-196), "calcium-like" (211-255) and intermediary intervals. Nomenclature was readapted using nonechoic, hypoechoic I to IV, echoic I to IV, hyperechoic I to IV, and saturated echoes to avoid inference to actual kidney tissue. Descriptive and comparative statistics were based on percentages of pixels in specific brightness ranges. SAMPLE POPULATION: Eight women and 2 men, 26 ± 4 years (range, 22-34 years) old, were studied. Kidney length was 10.5 ± 0.9 cm (9.0-12.0 cm). Doppler US resistivity index was 0.67 ± 0.03 (0.62-0.71). RESULTS: Original fascia brightness converted to 200 value had a mean ± SD of 206 ± 16 (range, 181-236). Kidney grayscale median averaged 37 ± 6 (27-48). Most pixels were hypoechoic II to IV (8-60), averaging 78% ± 6% (66%-87%). Percentages for fat-like, intermediary fat/muscle-like, and hypoechoic muscle-like intervals averaged 25%, 28%, and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A reference database for USTC/USVH of normal young kidneys was created for future comparisons with transplanted and abnormal kidneys. Normal renal echoes have low brightness. Hyperechoic pixels may represent abnormalities.

Assuntos