RESUMO

In tropical climate countries, animal production faces a huge challenge, being the high solar irradiation levels an important factor that negatively influences the welfare and animal performance. The purpose of this research was to check the environment inside mobile shelters with different kinds of cover materials. This research has been developed at the State University of Goiás, Brazil, being used four different cover materials: DFPC, double-faced plastic canvas; PVC, polyvinyl chloride; VFB, tiles made with vegetable fiber and bitumen; and VFBW, tiles made with vegetable fiber and bitumen being the outer face painted white. Covers were placed up mobile shelters with the following dimensions: 1 m length × 1 m width × 1 m height and cover pitch of 30°. The environment was evaluated through thermal comfort indexes: enthalpy (H), temperature and humidity index (THI), black globe and humidity index (BGHI), mean radiant temperature (MRT) and thermal heat load (THL), and the measurement of thermal environmental variables (temperature of external (EST) and internal (IST) surface of the cover, dry bulb temperature (Tdb), black globe temperature (Tbg), relative humidity (RH), and wind speedy (WS)). Data analysis was performed using PROC MIXED of SAS® by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey test, at 5% of significance level. There was observed beneficial effect of the usage of shading, with a decrease in air temperature and thermal comfort indexes when compared with the unshaded environment. The materials presented different thermal behavior, with better results for PVC and VFBW, that presented lower internal (IST) and external surface temperature (EST), in addition to lower black globe temperature, thermal heat load, and black globe and humidity index. PVC and VFBW were the best types of covers evaluated, with significant decreased thermal comfort indexes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of waste is a method of increasing methane (CH4) yield and improving biofertilizer quality. This study aimed to evaluate the best AcoD conditions for swine manure (SM) with sweet potato (SP) or cassava (C) in different amounts in semi-continuous biodigesters. Initially, using batch biodigesters, an AcoD test of the SM with SP or C was performed, adopting carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratios of 10/1, 13/1, 17/1, and 22/1. Based on the results, a C/N ratio of 10/1 was chosen, which was the proportion that resulted in the highest reduction of volatile solids (VS) and specific biogas production. From these results, the experiment was carried out in semi-continuous biodigesters, consisting of three treatments (control (SM), SP 10/1, and C 10/1) with five replicates and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 30 days. Total solid (TS) and volatile solid (VS) reductions, biogas and CH4 yields, alkalinity, and volatile acidity were measured. The control treatment differed from the others and resulted in decreased biogas yield (752 LN.kgVSadded -1), CH4 (449 LN.kgVSadded -1), and CH4 content (59.7%). The AcoD treatments (SP and C) did not differ significantly for biogas yield (respectively, 901 and 883 LN.kgVSadded -1) and CH4 (respectively, 590 and 547 LN.kgVSadded -1); however, they differed in CH4 content (65.5% and 61.9% respectively). The treatments showed general reduction averages of 76.1% and 85.9% for TS and VS, respectively, with no statistical difference found between them. The AcoD of the SM with SP or C increased the production and quality of the biogas, increasing the concentration of CH4 therein.

RESUMO: A co-digestão anaeróbia dos resíduos é uma alternativa para aumentar a produção de metano (CH4) e melhorar a qualidade do biofertilizante. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a melhor condição de coDA dos dejetos de suínos (DS), acrescidos de batata doce (BD) ou mandioca (M) em diferentes inclusões, em biodigestores semi-contínuos. Inicialmente, utilizando biodigestores batelada, foi realizado ensaio de coDA dos DS com BD ou M, adotando-se as relações C/N iguais a 10/1, 13/1, 17/1, e 22/1. Com base nos resultados elegeu-se a relação C/N de 10/1, como sendo a proporção que apresentou maiores reduções de sólidos voláteis (SV) e produções específicas de biogás. A partir destes resultados, efetivou-se o experimento em biodigestores semi-contínuos, composto por três tratamentos (controle (DS), BD 10/1 e M 10/1) com cinco repetições cada, e tempo de retenção hidráulica (TRH) de 30 dias. Foram mensuradas as reduções de sólidos totais (ST) e sólidos voláteis (SV), produções de biogás e CH4, alcalinidade e acidez volátil. O tratamento controle diferiu dos demais e apresentou menor desempenho no rendimento de biogás (752 LN.kgSVadic -1), CH4 (449 LN.kgSVadic -1) e concentração de CH4 (59,7%). Os tratamentos em coDA (BD e M) não diferiram entre si para o rendimento de biogás (901 e 883 LN.kgSVadic -1) e CH4 (590 e 547 LN.kgSVadic -1), no entanto diferiram na concentração de CH4 (65,5 e 61,9%, respectivamente). Os tratamentos apresentaram médias gerais de reduções de 76,1 e 85,9% para ST e SV, respectivamente, não sendo encontrada diferença estatística entre eles. A coDA do DS com BD ou M aumentou a produção e a qualidade do biogás, elevando a concentração de CH4 no mesmo.

RESUMO

Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of waste is a method of increasing methane (CH4) yield and improving biofertilizer quality. This study aimed to evaluate the best AcoD conditions for swine manure (SM) with sweet potato (SP) or cassava (C) in different amounts in semi-continuous biodigesters. Initially, using batch biodigesters, an AcoD test of the SM with SP or C was performed, adopting carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratios of 10/1, 13/1, 17/1, and 22/1. Based on the results, a C/N ratio of 10/1 was chosen, which was the proportion that resulted in the highest reduction of volatile solids (VS) and specific biogas production. From these results, the experiment was carried out in semi-continuous biodigesters, consisting of three treatments (control (SM), SP 10/1, and C 10/1) with five replicates and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 30 days. Total solid (TS) and volatile solid (VS) reductions, biogas and CH4 yields, alkalinity, and volatile acidity were measured. The control treatment differed from the others and resulted in decreased biogas yield (752 LN.kgVSadded -1), CH4 (449 LN.kgVSadded -1), and CH4 content (59.7%). The AcoD treatments (SP and C) did not differ significantly for biogas yield (respectively, 901 and 883 LN.kgVSadded -1) and CH4 (respectively, 590 and 547 LN.kgVSadded -1); however, they differed in CH4 content (65.5% and 61.9% respectively). The treatments showed general reduction averages of 76.1% and 85.9% for TS and VS, respectively, with no statistical difference found between them. The AcoD of the SM with SP or C increased the production and quality of the biogas, increasing the concentration of CH4 therein.(AU)

A co-digestão anaeróbia dos resíduos é uma alternativa para aumentar a produção de metano (CH4) e melhorar a qualidade do biofertilizante. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a melhor condição de coDA dos dejetos de suínos (DS), acrescidos de batata doce (BD) ou mandioca (M) em diferentes inclusões, em biodigestores semi-contínuos. Inicialmente, utilizando biodigestores batelada, foi realizado ensaio de coDA dos DS com BD ou M, adotando-se as relações C/N iguais a 10/1, 13/1, 17/1, e 22/1. Com base nos resultados elegeu-se a relação C/N de 10/1, como sendo a proporção que apresentou maiores reduções de sólidos voláteis (SV) e produções específicas de biogás. A partir destes resultados, efetivou-se o experimento em biodigestores semi-contínuos, composto por três tratamentos (controle (DS), BD 10/1 e M 10/1) com cinco repetições cada, e tempo de retenção hidráulica (TRH) de 30 dias. Foram mensuradas as reduções de sólidos totais (ST) e sólidos voláteis (SV), produções de biogás e CH4, alcalinidade e acidez volátil. O tratamento controle diferiu dos demais e apresentou menor desempenho no rendimento de biogás (752 LN.kgSVadic -1), CH4 (449 LN.kgSVadic -1) e concentração de CH4 (59,7%). Os tratamentos em coDA (BD e M) não diferiram entre si para o rendimento de biogás (901 e 883 LN.kgSVadic -1) e CH4 (590 e 547 LN.kgSVadic -1), no entanto diferiram na concentração de CH4 (65,5 e 61,9%, respectivamente). Os tratamentos apresentaram médias gerais de reduções de 76,1 e 85,9% para ST e SV, respectivamente, não sendo encontrada diferença estatística entre eles. A coDA do DS com BD ou M aumentou a produção e a qualidade do biogás, elevando a concentração de CH4 no mesmo.(AU)

Assuntos