Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(7): e13305, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053895

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. In August 2020, the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card test became available as a timely and affordable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, but its performance may vary due to factors including timing and symptomatology. This study evaluates BinaxNOW diagnostic performance in diverse epidemiological contexts. METHODS: Using RT-PCR as reference, we assessed performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in anterior nasal swabs from participants of two studies in Puerto Rico from December 2020 to May 2023. Test performance was assessed by days post symptom onset, collection strategy, vaccination status, symptomatology, repeated testing, and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. RESULTS: BinaxNOW demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 98.8%. Sensitivity peaked within 1-6 days after symptom onset (93.2%) and was higher for symptomatic (86.3%) than asymptomatic (67.3%) participants. Sensitivity declined over the course of infection, dropping from 96.3% in the initial test to 48.4% in testing performed 7-14 days later. BinaxNOW showed 99.5% sensitivity in participants with low Ct values (≤ 25) but lower sensitivity (18.2%) for participants with higher Cts (36-40). CONCLUSIONS: BinaxNOW demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage infections and symptomatic participants. In situations where test sensitivity is crucial for clinical decision-making, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and epidemiological context when interpreting test results and emphasize the need for ongoing research to adapt testing strategies to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígenos Virais/análise , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19/métodos , Idoso , Teste para COVID-19/métodos
2.
Cancer ; 85(5): 1084-90, 1999 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10091792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) breast carcinoma and the use of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for its treatment show substantial geographic and ethnic variations nationwide. To the authors' knowledge, few studies have investigated incidence rates and treatment patterns in Hispanics and American Indians. METHODS: The authors used data from the population-based New Mexico Tumor Registry to describe trends in DCIS incidence rates between 1973-1994 and investigate patient and physician characteristics related to BCS in a multiethnic population between 1985-1994. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate patient and physician factors related to receiving BCS. RESULTS: Incidence rates for DCIS in Hispanics were approximately 50% lower compared with non-Hispanic whites. American Indians had the lowest incidence rate. Beginning in 1985, incidence rates for Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites showed a 21% annual increase. Between 1990-1994, incidence rates in American Indians increased more than twofold. BCS increased 5.8% per year between 1985-1994, with 50% of Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients treated with BCS in 1994. The strongest factor associated with receiving BCS was geographic location of treatment (P < 0.001). The odds of receiving BCS were 5.8 times higher in the northern third of the state compared with the southern third. No significant variation in BCS was found by ethnicity, rural/urban residency, socioeconomic status, or physician characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence rates for DCIS increased substantially in all three ethnic groups. The use of BCS was associated most strongly with the location of treatment, most likely reflecting differences in physician practices and treatment recommendations. Further research is needed to investigate the increasing incidence rates of DCIS and the determinants of BCS for the treatment of DCIS.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Carcinoma in Situ/etnologia , Carcinoma in Situ/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/etnologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma in Situ/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Mastectomia Segmentar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Mexico/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Sistema de Registros , Risco , Programa de SEER
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA