RESUMO
Introduction: Sick building syndrome (SBS) refers to non-specific complaints, including upper-respiratory irritative symptoms, headaches, fatigue, and rash, which are usually associated with a particular building by their temporal pattern of occurrence and clustering among inhabitants or colleagues. The aim of the study was to determine the association between the clinical manifestations of sick building syndrome with outdoor pollutants and airborne pollen. Methods: It was a descriptive and prospective observational study conducted from November 2021 to April 2022. It included subjects over 18 years old who completed an online survey on sick building syndrome (general symptoms, nasal, ocular, oropharyngeal, and skin symptoms) presented at home, housing information and personal history. The APS-330 from Pollen Sense ® was used to obtain data on pollen in the air and the local pollution monitoring system (SIMA) to obtain information regarding pollutants. For statistical analysis, SPSS version 16 was used. Results: A total of 402 surveys were included; 91% of the subjects reported having at least 1 symptom. Females presented more general symptoms (fatigue and headache) than males. Subjects with a personal history of atopy showed a higher prevalence of practically all symptoms. Airborne pollen exposure was positively associated with mucosal symptoms in eyes and nose. Outdoor fungi spore exposure was positively associated with oculo-nasal and cutaneous symptoms in the scalp. Conclusion: This study found significant associations with female gender and a history of atopy, which suggests a higher risk for these subjects. Despite the limitations of the study, we can conclude that there is an association between the clinical manifestations of sick building syndrome with indoor and outdoor pollution.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In prostate cancer, androgens are key in the growth of both normal prostate and cancer cells. Abiraterone acetate inhibits CYP17, an important target in prostate cancer given its central role in the production of adrenal and tumor-derived androgens. Although abiraterone is generally well tolerated, common adverse effects such as hypertension, hypokalemia, and hepatotoxicity have been reported. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of an 83-year-old Mexican man with high-volume EC IV prostate cancer resistant to castration, orchiectomy, and bone, liver, and lung metastases. First-line treatment with the CHAARTED scheme was indicated, by patient decision refuse chemotherapy treatment. On the fourth day of starting treatment, he developed pruritic erythematous macular skin lesions and urticaria on the posterior chest that resolved spontaneously. A generalized erythematous and pruritic maculopapular rash appeared 12 days after starting abiraterone, for which she was referred to allergies. MANAGEMENT AND RESULTS: An oral provocation test was performed for two days, presenting localized macular lesions eight hours after the administration of abiraterone. An oral desensitization protocol was carried out for ten days in which no hypersensitivity reactions were observed, thus achieving the successful administration of abiraterone.
Assuntos
Androstenos , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Androstenos/uso terapêutico , Androstenos/efeitos adversos , Androstenos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Background: Asthma and allergic diseases have increased in recent decades and are more common in industrialized countries. Industrial areas with a considerably high number of inhabitants and vehicles can favor the presence of serious air pollution and therefore the appearance and exacerbation of respiratory allergy symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between exposure to environmental pollutants with exacerbation of respiratory allergy. Methods: A total of 240 subjects above 6 years old who lived in the metropolitan area of Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, with diagnosis of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma, were included. The subject's address was registered in the database and the rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT) and the asthma control test (ACT) were applied. Environmental data were obtained from the Environmental Monitoring System (SIMA) of Nuevo León. Geolocation of industries and avenues in proximity of subject's addresses and SIMA stations were obtained through geographic information systems using ArcGis software. Results: The relation between pollutants and subjects' RCAT, ACT, and spirometry results in the 14 stations was established. PM10 and forced vital capacity (FVC) had an r = 0.074 with p = 0.005, PM10 and absolute FEV1/FVC ratio presented an r = -0.102 with a p = 0.000; The distance found to be associated with a worsening of respiratory symptoms was living 165 m from a main road or 241 m from an industrial establishment. Conclusions: Exposure to pollutants present in the environment are factors associated with increased symptoms in subjects with respiratory allergies.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy of doxofylline as an ICS-sparing agent in the treatment of Mexican children with asthma. METHODS: 10-week, open-label, crossover, pilot study, we examined the steroid-sparing effect of doxofylline in Mexican children with asthma. Patients aged 6-16 years treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for at least 8 wk before enrollment were divided randomly into two groups at the baseline visit. Group A (n = 31) received doxofylline (18 mg/kg/day) plus standard-dose budesonide (D + SDB) for the first 4-week period followed by doxofylline plus reduced-dose budesonide (D + RDB) for the second 4-week period. Group B (n = 30) received D + RDB followed by D + SDB. Clinical outcomes assessed included lung function (forced expiratory volume; in 1 s, FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma control, number of exacerbations and use of rescue medication (salbutamol). RESULTS: It was shown that combined use of doxofylline and ICS may allow children with asthma to reduce their daily dose of ICS while maintaining lung function and improving asthma control (p = 0.008). There were few asthma exacerbations and only one patient required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. Rescue medication use decreased significantly in patients receiving D + SDB during the first 4-week period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that doxofylline may be a steroid-sparing treatment in asthma, but longer-term, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations.
Assuntos
Asma , Budesonida , Estudos Cross-Over , Quimioterapia Combinada , Teofilina , Teofilina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Criança , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , México , Teofilina/uso terapêutico , Teofilina/administração & dosagem , Projetos Piloto , Budesonida/administração & dosagem , Budesonida/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
This allergy is a hypersensitivity reaction that is triggered by contact with latex. Symptoms vary depending on factors such as route, frequency, and exposure dose, as well as individual susceptibility. The clinical manifestations can be localized at the site of contact with latex or generalized. Exposure can occur directly as a result of contact with the skin and mucous membranes, that is by touching or being touched by objects with latex, or by inhaling (breathing) particles from objects with latex. Contact can also be indirect; for example, by ingesting food that has been handled by a worker wearing latex gloves or by having contact with a person who has been blowing up balloons. The diagnosis of latex allergy is made based on the patient's medical history and on what has been reported in the interrogation, and it is complemented with in vivo studies (such as skin tests and provocation tests) or in vitro studies (determination of specific IgE). The fundamental pillar in the treatment of latex allergy is the education of the patient to achieve the avoidance of products made with this material or the contact and intake of food that has had contact with latex. In view of the foregoing, latex allergy has a great medical and social relevance due to all the safety measures that the patient must take.
La alergia es una reacción de hipersensibilidad desencadenada tras el contacto con el látex. Los síntomas varían dependiendo de factores como la ruta, frecuencia y dosis de exposición, además de la susceptibilidad individual. Las manifestaciones clínicas pueden darse de forma localizada, en el sitio de contacto con el látex, o generalizadas. La exposición puede ocurrir de forma directa como resultado del contacto con la piel y mucosas, por tocar o ser tocado por objetos con látex, o al inhalar partículas provenientes de objetos con látex. El contacto también puede ser indirecto, al ingerir alimentos que fueron manipulados por un trabajador con guantes de látex, al tener contacto con una persona que ha estado inflando globos, por ejemplo. El diagnóstico de alergia al látex se realiza basado en la historia clínica del paciente, lo reportado en el interrogatorio y se complementa con estudios in vivo (como las pruebas cutáneas y las pruebas de provocación) o estudios in vitro (determinación de IgE específica). El pilar fundamental en el tratamiento de la alergia al látex es la educación del paciente para lograr la evitación de productos elaborados con este producto o el contacto e ingesta de alimentos que tuvieron contacto con el látex. Por lo anterior, la alergia al látex tiene una gran relevancia médica y social por todas las medidas de seguridad que debe llevar el paciente.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade ao Látex , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/etiologia , Testes CutâneosRESUMO
Despite the efforts made to mitigate the consequences of this disease, natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) continues to be a global health problem and is still considered one of the main worries in the working environment in many countries throughout the world. Due to thousands of products containing latex, it is not surprising that the current statistics suggest that prevalence remains high among healthcare workers and susceptible patients. In developed countries, reduction in the prevalence of IgE-mediated allergy to latex proteins from gloves may lead to lax attention by health care personnel. On the other hand, this situation is different in developing countries where there is a lack of epidemiological data associated with a deficit in education and awareness of this issue. The aim of this review is to provide an update of the current knowledge and practical recommendations regarding NRLA by allergologists from different parts of the world with experience in this field.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin is a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate used for the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Hypersensitivity reactions to brentuximab vedotin may include cutaneous, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal and neurological signs and symptoms. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 23-year-old Mexican female with stage IV progressive classical nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma who received multiple previous chemotherapy regimens. Brentuximab vedotin at 1.8 mg/kg (180 mg total dose), for 21-day cycles was indicated. Within 5 min of infusion of the 5th cycle of brentuximab, she developed severe anaphylaxis (hives, angioedema, diaphoresis, tachycardia, dyspnea, hypoxemia and loss of consciousness), which was successfully controlled with epinephrine, steroids and antihistamines.Management and outcome: Intradermal skin test at a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml was positive. Due to the severity of the symptoms and the lack of access to alternative treatments, we performed a desensitization protocol. A total of 180 mg of brentuximab was given in three bag solutions in 12 steps, with an initial concentration dose of 1/100 of the total dose in a course of 5.56 h with no hypersensitivity reactions. DISCUSSION: Severe anaphylaxis has been reported in 1.2% of patients receiving brentuximab vedotin. Patients who are treated by rapid drug desensitization with their first option therapy present a favorable survival rate with better cost-effectiveness in comparison to second-line treatment.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia/terapia , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotin/efeitos adversos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Doença de Hodgkin/complicações , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Brentuximab Vedotin/uso terapêutico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Testes Intradérmicos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
To evaluate the effect of ursolic acid on metabolic syndrome, insulin sensitivity, and inflammation, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was carried out in 24 patients (30-60 years) with a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome without treatment. They were randomly assigned to two groups of 12 patients, each to receive orally 150 mg of ursolic acid or homologated placebo once a day for 12 weeks. Before and after the intervention, the components of metabolic syndrome, insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), and inflammation profile (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) were evaluated. After ursolic acid administration, the remission of metabolic syndrome occurred in 50% of patients (P = .005) with significant differences in body weight (75.7 ± 11.5 vs. 71 ± 11 kg, P = .002), body mass index (BMI) (29.9 + 3.6 vs. 24.9 ± 1.2 kg/m2, P = .049), waist circumference (93 ± 8.9 vs. 83 + 8.6 cm, P = .008), fasting glucose (6.0 ± 0.5 vs. 4.7 ± 0.4 mmol/L, P = .002), and insulin sensitivity (3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2, P = .003). Ursolic acid administration leads to transient remission of metabolic syndrome, reducing body weight, BMI, waist circumference and fasting glucose, as well as increasing insulin sensitivity.