RESUMEN
Rasch analysis was employed to investigate the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and its shorter versions (EUROHIS-QOL-8 and WHOQOL-5) within the context of patients undergoing warfarin in Thailand. A group of 260 patients were recruited from three public hospitals and tasked with completing the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Rasch analysis showed that the WHOQOL-BREF, structured into four-domain subtests, achieved a commendable fit to the Rasch model (χ2[16] = 12.26, p = 0.73), met the criterion of unidimensionality (7.31% significant t-tests; lower bound confidence interval, 4.66), and demonstrated satisfactory reliability (PSI = 0.87). The adoption of a subtest approach facilitated an acceptable fit to the Rasch model for each domain of the WHOQOL-BREF, except for the social domain. However, the presence of local dependency of the three-item social domain was detected, so the reliability was not reported. The WHOQOL-5 proved to be unidimensional, fitting the Rasch model acceptably, and had satisfactory reliability. Conversely, the EUROHIS-QOL-8 presented local dependency; thus, reliability was not reported. Consequently, the WHOQOL-BREF in its four-domain subtests is recommended for pre- and post-HRQoL measurements, whereas the WHOQOL-5 can effectively measure HRQoL levels in between-group analyses.
Asunto(s)
Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Tailandia , Psicometría/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adulto , Pueblos del Sudeste AsiáticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the application value and safety of Warfarin, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A total of 180 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to their anticoagulant treatment regimen, patients were divided into three groups: Warfarin (57 cases), Rivaroxaban (61 cases), and Dabigatran (62 cases). General demographic information was collected, and coagulation function indicators-including fibrinogen (FIB), thrombin time (PT), activated partial thrombin time (APTT), and D-dimer (D-D)-as well as liver function indexes-including total bilirubin (TbiL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine transferase (ALT)-were compared before and after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics such as gender, age, body mass index, or disease course among the three groups. The total effective rate in the Warfarin group (84.21%) was significantly lower than in the Rivaroxaban (98.36%) and Dabigatran (96.77%) groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found in the effects of the three drugs on coagulation function, liver function, or the incidence of bleeding (p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: Warfarin, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran can effectively prevent thrombosis in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran showing superior effectiveness. All three drugs demonstrated similar low rates of bleeding events and had no significant impact on coagulation and liver function.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Coagulación Sanguínea , Dabigatrán , Rivaroxabán , Warfarina , Humanos , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antitrombinas/efectos adversos , Antitrombinas/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Heavy menstrual bleeding affects up to two thirds of women on oral anticoagulation. The rates of heavy menstrual bleeding, its impact on quality of life and associated risk factors in women attending anticoagulation clinics in South Africa are largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed over an eight-month period in women on Warfarin (n = 30) and Rivaroxaban (n = 27) for a median [interquartile range] duration of 15.5 [78.0] months attending an anticoagulation clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. Heavy menstrual bleeding was assessed over one menstrual cycle using the validated pictorial blood loss assessment charts (PBAC) and the menstrual bleeding questionnaire (MBQ). RESULTS: In this population of predominantly African ethnicity, with a median age of 39 [8] years, 39 (68.4%) women experienced heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a PBAC score of >100. Median cycle length on anticoagulation and MBQ scores were significantly higher among women with a PBAC score of >100 (p > 0.05). Univariate analysis identified Rivaroxaban as a risk factor for heavy menstrual bleeding (OR 5.03, 95% CI 1.40-18.12). Heavy menstrual bleeding required treatment in 29 (74.4%) women which included management of iron deficiency, anti-fibrinolytics, modification of anticoagulation and hormonal contraception. CONCLUSION: Heavy menstrual bleeding was associated with a considerable negative impact on quality of life. This was most significant for women on Rivaroxaban as compared to Warfarin. It is essential to monitor and appropriately treat heavy menstrual bleeding in at risk women on anticoagulant treatment.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Menorragia , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Menorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Sudáfrica , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the quality of life of patients receiving warfarin therapy at Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, and its relationship with demographic factors. Patients and Methods: The procedures started with the submission of a study permit, followed by validation of the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) questionnaire. In addition, the validated questionnaire was completed by the participants, and significant variables were analyzed using the chi-square method for multivariate analysis. Results: The results showed that the questionnaire was valid and could be used for further analyses. Among the 88 selected participants, 52 and 36 had scoring categories <56.266 and 56.266 ≤ x ≤ 143.734, respectively, with no patients having a scoring category > 143.734. In addition, participants with low education and aged ≥ 52 years were 4.916 and 3.161 times more at risk of having quality of life score of 56.266 ≤ x ≤ 143.734, respectively. Based on the results, the average quality of life score of patients was 59.66. Participants with low educational levels and those aged ≥ 52 years were at a higher risk of having quality of life score of 56.266 ≤ x ≤ 143.734. Conclusion: In summary, a lower quality of life score was linked to increased comfort and satisfaction among patients receiving warfarin treatment. Additionally, these patients experienced fewer feelings of limitations and inconveniences related to their treatment plans.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Indonesia/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Escolaridad , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Edad , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Warfarin patients who need dental extraction face the problem of bleeding and no sufficient hemostasis results in dry socket and postoperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the topical application of tranexamic acid-soaked absorbable Gelfoam (TXA-Gel) and saline-soaked absorbable Gelfoam (saline-Gel) in relieving postoperative pain following bilateral simple extraction of permanent mandibular molars in warfarin patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, triple-blinded, split-mouth, active-controlled clinical trial. It was performed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, between November 2021 and October 2023. 60 bilateral permanent mandibular molars, which were indicated for simple extraction in 30 warfarin patients randomly assigned into two groups according to the topical hemostatic agents after extraction used: Group 1: control group, saline-Gel (n = 30). Group 2: TXA-Gel (n = 30). A simple randomization method was performed by flipping a coin. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale (VAS). The intensity of pain was evaluated at the baseline (t0), and on the 1st (t1), 2nd (t2), 3rd (t3), 4th (t4), 5th (t5), 6th (t6), and 7th (t7) days following extraction. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Mann-Whitney U test were performed. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The mean vas scores was 4.17 ± 1.76 at t1 and decreased to 0.73 ± 0.78 at t7 in the TXA-Gel group. However, in the Gelfoam group, the mean vas scores was 4.83 ± 2.18 at t1 and decreased to 1.80 ± 1.00 at t7. The results of the Mann-Whitney U test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at t1 (p = 0.236) and t2 (p = 0.155). However, there was a statistically significance difference at the rest time points (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TXA-Gel played a prominent role in alleviating post-extraction pain in warfarin patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trail was retrospectively registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN71901901).
Asunto(s)
Administración Tópica , Esponja de Gelatina Absorbible , Dolor Postoperatorio , Extracción Dental , Ácido Tranexámico , Warfarina , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Esponja de Gelatina Absorbible/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Dimensión del Dolor , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Hemostáticos/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Diente Molar/cirugíaRESUMEN
Renal function significantly influences the appropriate warfarin dosage. However, studies investigating the impact of genetic factors on warfarin dosage, considering renal function, are limited. This study aimed to assess the role of genetic polymorphisms in VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP4F2, GGCX, and APOE in warfarin dosage adjustment considering renal function. A total of 108 outpatients receiving warfarin treatment with controlled prothrombin time-targeted international normalized ratio (1.5-3.0) were included. Patient data, warfarin dosage, and laboratory results were collected from electronic medical records. Each SNP [VKORC1 rs9923231, CYP2C9 rs1057910, CYP4F2 rs2108622, CYP2C19* 2 (rs4244285) and* 3 (rs4986893), GGCX rs699664 and rs12714145, and APOE rs7421] was analyzed. Multiple regression analysis revealed estimated glomerular filtration rate as the most significant factor influencing warfarin dose (p <0.001) (ß = -0.445). VKORC1 rs9923231 AA, CYP4F2 rs2108622 CT/TT, GGCX rs12714145 CT/TT, and CYP2C9 rs1057910 AC carriers were associated with warfarin dose (p <0.001, 0.015, 0.020, 0.038 and ß = -0.317, 0.191, -0.188, -0.162, respectively); however, other genes showed no significant association. In conclusion, after adjusting for renal function, genetic factors of VKORC1 rs9923231, CYP4F2 rs2108622, GGCX rs12714145, and CYP2C9 rs1057910 were found to contribute to warfarin dosage, having impact in that order. In contrast, the contribution of other genes to warfarin dosage was absent or negligible.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pueblo Asiatico/genética , Japón , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Vitamina K Epóxido Reductasas/genética , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Familia 4 del Citocromo P450/genética , Genotipo , Adulto , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with thromboembolic problems, prosthetic valves, or coagulation issues are commonly prescribed anticoagulants and antiplatelets. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication might constitute a challenge for dentists and dental hygienists since possible prolonged bleeding might interfere with dental procedures. The aim of the present study was to examine the bleeding durations associated with various anticoagulants and antiplatelets during professional dental hygiene sessions, utilizing a modified Ivy test adapted for the oral context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing professional oral hygiene were recruited. Debridement during oral hygiene was performed using ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation, and bleeding sites were assessed and treated with gentle pressure using sterile gauzes. The time for bleeding cessation was recorded. Patients were categorized into six groups based on their drug intake, Control: no anticoagulants or antiplatelets DTI: direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) AntiXa: directa factor Xa inhibitors (endoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban) VKA: vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, acenocoumarol) SAPT: single anti-platelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel) DAPT: dual anti-platelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel). Bleeding time was measured in seconds and mean values were assessed among the different groups. Differences between groups were investigated with Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc correction for multiple comparisons or two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post-hoc; RESULTS: Control patients presented the lowest bleeding time 50 s, followed by AntiXa (98), SAPT (105), DTI (120), DAPT (190) and VKA (203). A statistically significant difference was present among control and DTI (p = 0.004), VKA (p < 0.001), DAPT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present outcomes, an increased risk of prolonged bleeding emerged in patients taking VKA and DAPT. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: bleeding did not interfere with the oral hygiene session The optimal period for dental treatment of these patients should be 2-3 h before the next dose, without the need to temporarily suspend the medication.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Sangría , Hemorragia Bucal/prevención & control , Hemorragia Bucal/etiología , Anciano , Adulto , Higiene Bucal , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease have higher risks of bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality. However, optimal anticoagulant choice in these high-risk patients remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using deidentified electronic health records from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, adults with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) initiating warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban between 2011 and 2021 were included. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting, adjusted risks of major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death were compared among agents. A total of 6794 patients were included (mean age, 78.5 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, 24.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2; 51% women). Apixaban versus warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 1.5 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.70]), and similar risks for stroke/systemic embolism (incidence rate, 1.9 versus 2.4 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59-1.09]) and death (incidence rate, 4.6 versus 4.5 per 100 person-years; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 4.9 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.10-2.48]), with no difference in risks for stroke/systemic embolism and death. Apixaban versus rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (sub-HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.78]). CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings are consistent with potential safety advantages of apixaban over warfarin and rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. Further randomized trials comparing individual oral anticoagulants are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Embolia , Hemorragia , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Rivaroxabán , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Warfarina , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Embolia/prevención & control , Embolia/epidemiología , Embolia/etiología , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Incidencia , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is still controversial. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) versus dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy in management of patients with isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 79 patients diagnosed on elective coronary angiography to have either isolated CAE or non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. Patients were assigned in 1:1 pattern to receive either VKA (warfarin) or DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel). Patients were followed-up for nine-months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative events rate including acute coronary event, target vessel intervention, or cardiac death. Analysis of cumulative events at different time intervals, its individual components, and bleeding were considered secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Cumulative events rate was 33%, with mortality rate of 2.5%. Both treatment groups showed comparable cumulative events during the nine-months follow-up duration. Nevertheless, Kaplan-Meier analysis beyond the first 3-months of follow-up showed significantly higher event-free survival among the VKA-group. Recurrent events (≥2) were significantly higher among the DAPT-group. Both groups showed no major bleeding events. Multivariable cox-regression analysis showed that presence of significant coronary tortuosity, use of DAPT in reference to VKA, and lower percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) among those receiving VKA were significant independent predictors of clinical adverse events beyond the first 3-months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cumulative adverse events were comparable among both treatment groups for isolated non-obstructive CAE. However, adverse events were significantly more frequent in the DAPT-group beyond the first three months.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Vitamina K , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Coronaria , Dilatación Patológica , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS) are rare congenital abnormalities causing abnormal blood flow between the portal vein and systemic circulation. This study reports on the peri-operative anticoagulation management of CPSS patients post closure, focusing on the incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of CPSS patients who underwent surgery or endovascular intervention between 2005 and 2021. The protocol included unfractionated heparin (UFH) during and immediately after surgery, followed by either warfarin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) postoperatively. Outcomes assessed included postoperative thrombotic and bleeding complications. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included. Postoperatively, 89% received treatment-dose UFH, transitioning to warfarin or LMWH at discharge. Thrombotic complications occurred in 16% of patients, predominantly in the superior mesenteric vein. Surgical interventions and continuous infusion of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were used for clot resolution. Bleeding complications were observed in 64% of patients, primarily managed with transfusions and temporary UFH interruption. No deaths related to thrombotic, or bleeding events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the delicate balance required in anticoagulation management for CPSS patients, revealing an occurrence of both thrombotic and bleeding complications postoperatively. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective study.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular , Trombosis , Warfarina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Lactante , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & control , Trombosis/epidemiología , Niño , Vena Porta/anomalías , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Heparina/efectos adversos , Recién Nacido , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Malformaciones Vasculares/complicaciones , Malformaciones Vasculares/cirugía , Sistema Porta/anomalías , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Although the adverse effects of long-term use of vitamin K oral anticoagulant (OAC), warfarin, on the coronary vasculature are well-established, it remains unknown whether nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants play a role in the attenuation of plaque progression and coronary calcification. This study aimed to compare the changes in atherosclerotic plaques and calcification of the coronary arteries in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with edoxaban and warfarin. A total of 150 OAC-naïve patients with AF and atherosclerotic lesions on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the edoxaban or warfarin treatment groups. All enrolled patients received rosuvastatin 10 mg and 119 patients completed the entire study protocol. A total of 12 months after the assigned OAC treatment, follow-up CCTA was performed and changes in plaque and calcium volumes of the coronary arteries were analyzed. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were well-balanced. The percentage of time in therapeutic range in the warfarin group was 61.1%. Compared with the baseline CCTA, there was a significant reduction in plaque volume after 12 months of OAC and rosuvastatin administration in both groups, and the extent of regression did not differ significantly between the groups. The increase in calcium volume was greater in the warfarin group than in the edoxaban group; however, the difference was not significant. In OAC-naïve patients with AF and atherosclerotic coronary lesions who were treated with moderate-intensity statin, edoxaban use did not have a positive effect on atherosclerotic plaques and coronary calcification compared with warfarin use over a 12-month follow-up period.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Placa Aterosclerótica , Piridinas , Tiazoles , Calcificación Vascular , Warfarina , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Placa Aterosclerótica/complicaciones , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke prevention guidance for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) uses evidence generated from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, applicability to patient groups excluded from trials remains unknown. Real-world patient data provide an opportunity to evaluate outcomes in a trial analogous population of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) users and in patients otherwise excluded from RCTs; however, there remains uncertainty on the validity of methods and suitability of the data. Successful reference trial emulation can support the generation of evidence around treatment effects in groups excluded or underrepresented in trials. We used linked United Kingdom primary care data to investigate whether we could emulate the pivotal ARISTOTLE trial (apixaban versus warfarin) and extend the analysis to investigate the impact of warfarin time in therapeutic range (TTR) on results. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patients with AF in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD Aurum) prescribed apixaban or warfarin from 1 January 2013 to 31 July 2019 were selected. ARISTOTLE eligibility criteria were applied to this population and matched to the RCT apixaban arm on baseline characteristics creating a trial-analogous apixaban cohort; this was propensity-score matched to warfarin users in the CPRD Aurum. ARISTOTLE outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression stratified by prior warfarin exposure status during 2.5 years of patient follow-up and results benchmarked against the trial results before treatment effectiveness was further evaluated based on (warfarin) TTR. The dataset comprised 8,734 apixaban users and propensity-score matched 8,734 warfarin users. Results [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] confirmed apixaban noninferiority for stroke or systemic embolism (SE) [CPRD 0.98 (0.82,1.19) versus trial 0.79 (0.66,0.95)] and death from any cause [CPRD 1.03 (0.93,1.14) versus trial 0.89 (0.80,0.998)] but did not indicate apixaban superiority. Absolute event rates for stroke/SE were similar for apixaban in CPRD Aurum and ARISTOTLE (1.27%/year), whereas a lower event rate was observed for warfarin (CPRD Aurum 1.29%/year, ARISTOTLE 1.60%/year). Analysis by TTR suggested similar effectiveness of apixaban compared with poorly controlled warfarin (TTR < 0.75) for stroke/SE [0.91 (0.73, 1.14)], all-cause death [0.94 (0.84, 1.06)], and superiority for major bleeding [0.74 (0.63, 0.86)]. However, when compared with well-controlled warfarin (TTR ≥ 0.75), apixaban was associated with an increased hazard for all-cause death [1.20 (1.04, 1.37)], and there was no significant benefit for major bleeding [1.08 (0.90, 1.30)]. The main limitation of the study's methodology are the risk of residual confounding, channelling bias and attrition bias in the warfarin arm, and selection bias and misclassification in the analysis by TTR. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of noninterventional data generated results demonstrating noninferiority of apixaban versus warfarin consistent with prespecified benchmarking criteria. Unlike in ARISTOTLE, superiority of apixaban versus warfarin was not seen, possible due to the lower proportion of Asian patients and higher proportion of patients with well-controlled warfarin compared to ARISTOTLE. This methodological template can be used to investigate treatment effects of oral anticoagulants in patient groups excluded from or underrepresented in trials and provides a framework that can be adapted to investigate treatment effects for other conditions.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Warfarina , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
A 21-year-old gentleman presented with low responsiveness and an unwitnessed tonic-clonic seizure. A 3-day history of fevers, headaches, and poor sleep was reported. He was initially treated for meningoencephalitis. Subsequently, he developed an erythematous rash over the face and chest. He had three generalised tonic-clonic seizures and his Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) deteriorated to 8 out of 15 requiring intubation and ventilation, and antiepileptics. Lumbar puncture (LP) results were unremarkable; however, the computed tomography (CT) head concluded bilateral haemorrhages and commented on the possibility of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Computed tomography venogram (CTV) confirmed CVST in the superior sagittal sinus, cortical vein and left transverse sinus. Repeat CT head revealed no new changes. Clinically, he exhibited residual left-sided weakness following stroke secondary to CVST. The patient was discharged with lifelong warfarin due to unprovoked CVST. He re-presented ten months later with persistent headaches. Clinical review noted bilateral papilloedema and he required LP to relieve raised intracranial pressure (ICP). In a 5-year follow-up, he continues to have raised ICP and associated headaches requiring further LPs. He continues to take warfarin, levetiracetam and topiramate, for headaches. This is an atypical case of CVST presenting initially with meningoencephalitis-like symptoms, demonstrating diverse clinical presentation. Ergo, this encourages an early multidisciplinary approach in presentations of headaches and seizures as clinical suspicion for CVST is high. Ultimately, this will appropriately identify patients for neuroimaging with computed tomography/magnetic resonance venogram. Furthermore, 5-year follow-up is presented in this case highlighting the importance of long-term follow-up in view of variable long-term complications that remain difficult to predict.
Asunto(s)
Meningoencefalitis , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Masculino , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/etiología , Meningoencefalitis/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Intracraneal/etiología , Hipertensión Intracraneal/terapia , Hipertensión Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Cefalea/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Convulsiones/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been the drug of choice for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation since 2014. In previous studies, the stroke risk while taking warfarin was 2 per 100 patient-years and 1.5% per year while taking DOACs. We hypothesized that even if ischemic stroke occurred during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs, the prognosis was likely to be better than that with warfarin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 2002 to 2019, sourced from a nationwide claims database, were used to identify atrial fibrillation patients using International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients who experienced an ischemic stroke during anticoagulation were categorized by the drugs used (warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). The primary outcome was mortality within 3 months and 1 year after the ischemic stroke. Among the 9578 patients with ischemic stroke during anticoagulation, 3343 received warfarin, and 6235 received DOACs (965 dabigatran, 2320 apixaban, 1702 rivaroxaban, 1248 edoxaban). The DOACs group demonstrated lower risks of 3-month (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.550, [95% CI, 0.473-0.639]; P<0.0001) and 1-year mortality (adjusted HR, 0.596 [95% CI, 0.536-0.663]; P<0.0001) than the warfarin group. Apixaban and edoxaban within the DOAC group exhibited particularly reduced 1-year mortality risk compared with other DOACs (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that DOACs have a better prognosis than warfarin after ischemic stroke. The apixaban and edoxaban groups had a lower risk of death after ischemic stroke than the other DOAC groups.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Administración Oral , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Taiwán/epidemiología , Piridinas , TiazolesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, increasing the risk of embolism and stroke. There is a lack of information on the use of anticoagulants in this context. The choice between Warfarin and Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also is not well-established. This randomized study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of Warfarin and Rivaroxaban in preventing thrombotic events in POAF patients after isolated CABG. METHODS: A total of 66 patients were randomized parallelly with 1:1 allocation to receive either Rivaroxaban (n = 34) or Warfarin (n = 32). Major bleeding events within 30 days after discharge were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included minor bleeding events and thrombotic episodes. Clinical characteristics, medication regimens, and left atrial diameter were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests. RESULTS: No thrombotic episodes were observed in either treatment arm. No major bleeding events occurred in either group. Four minor bleeding events were reported, with no significant difference between the treatment groups (P = 0.6). Patients with atrial fibrillation had significantly larger left atrial diameters compared to those with normal sinus rhythm (40.5 vs. 37.8 mm, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that Warfarin and Rivaroxaban are both safe and effective for preventing thrombotic episodes in POAF patients after isolated CABG. No significant differences in major bleeding events were observed between the two anticoagulants. These findings may support the preference for DOACs like Rivaroxaban due to their convenience and easier maintenance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number IRCT20200304046696N1, Date 18/03/2020 https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/ .
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Hemorragia , Rivaroxabán , Warfarina , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Factibilidad , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH-Ca), followed by either warfarin or rivaroxaban, as treatment options for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: In this pilot study, cirrhotic (with liver function score of Child-Pugh A) patients diagnosed with PVT who were not on anticoagulant therapy received 2 weeks of subcutaneous injections of LMWH-Ca. They were then randomized to either warfarin (a full course of oral warfarin for 6 months) or rivaroxaban (a full course of oral rivaroxaban for 2 months), with 30 cases in each group. After a treatment period of up to 6 months, a comparative analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of both groups. Volumetric changes in PVT were monitored dynamically using enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment at week 2 and month 6. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients between the two groups. Rivaroxaban treatment reduced PVT median volume from 1.83 cm3 at week 2 to 0.0 cm3 at month 6 and prevented the worsening of PVT after 6 months of treatment with LMWH-Ca (Pâ <â 0.001). On the other hand, warfarin treatment increased PVT median volume from 1.95 cm3 at week 2 to 3.78 cm3 at month 6 (Pâ =â 0.002). None of the 30 patients in the rivaroxaban group had clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, while 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the warfarin group had gastrointestinal bleeding (Pâ =â 0.317). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban followed by LMWH-Ca is an effective anticoagulant treatment strategy for PVT in cirrhosis.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular , Cirrosis Hepática , Vena Porta , Rivaroxabán , Trombosis de la Vena , Warfarina , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
There are limited data on the optimal choice of anticoagulation in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX database to compare the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin in this patient population. Compared to warfarin, factor Xa inhibitors had a similar risk of deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.50-2.46]) or pulmonary embolism (HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 0.59-2.00]). There were no differences in the risk of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Factor Xa inhibitor-treated patients had lower all-cause mortality (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.36-0.86]) compared with warfarin. These data suggest that factor Xa inhibitors had similar safety and efficacy compared with warfarin for MM patients on IMiDs.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Mieloma Múltiple , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/uso terapéutico , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologíaRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among multiple myeloma patients. Chang and colleagues' findings indicate that factor Xa inhibitors are as effective as warfarin in preventing VTE without raising the risk of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding complications. Commentary on: Chang et al. The comparative efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin for primary thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy. Br J Haematol 2024;205:473-477.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Mieloma Múltiple , Tromboembolia Venosa , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A variety of thromboprophylaxis regimens have been administered in patients following the Fontan procedure. However, consensus guidelines regarding the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy have not yet been developed. METHOD: A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness among available thromboprophylaxis regimens and major bleeding events associated with these regimens. RESULTS: A total of 28 comparative studies with 4430 Fontan patients were included. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TE) was significantly lower in individuals who underwent thromboprophylaxis compared to those who did not. Compared to a no-treatment strategy, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) showed the largest treatment effect for preventing TE (OR = 0.08, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.21), followed by warfarin (OR = 0.16, 95 % CI 0.10 to 0.27), and aspirin (OR = 0.23, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.38). Indeed, NOACs were significantly more effective than aspirin in preventing TE (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.84). Aspirin was associated with the lowest occurrence of major bleeding events, followed by NOACs, no medication, and warfarin. NOACs were shown to possess a highly favorable overall profile. CONCLUSION: Prescribing thromboprophylaxis drugs, either antiplatelets or anticoagulants, may be more effective in preventing TE after the Fontan operation than not doing so. Among the included regimens, NOACs demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than aspirin; however, they did not show statistically significant superiority over warfarin. Aspirin exhibited lower rates of major bleeding compared to both NOACs and warfarin. Overall, NOACs tended to offer the most advantageous balance of efficacy and safety. However, the findings should be interpreted considering the certainty and limitations of the evidence, including potential residual confounding in observational studies.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Procedimiento de Fontan , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Procedimiento de Fontan/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Metaanálisis en Red , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/etiología , Warfarina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poor anticoagulation management of warfarin may lead to patient admission, prolonged hospital stays, and even death due to anticoagulation-related adverse events. Traditional non-web-based outpatient clinics struggle to provide ideal anticoagulation management services for patients, and there is a need to explore a safer, more effective, and more convenient mode of warfarin management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare differences in the quality of anticoagulation management and clinical adverse events between a web-based management model (via a smartphone app) and the conventional non-web-based outpatient management model. METHODS: This study is a prospective cohort research that includes multiple national centers. Patients meeting the nadir criteria were split into a web-based management group using the Alfalfa app or a non-web-based management group with traditional outpatient management, and they were then monitored for a 6-month follow-up period to collect coagulation test results and clinical events. The effectiveness and safety of the 2 management models were assessed by the following indicators: time in therapeutic range (TTR), bleeding events, thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality events, cumulative event rates, and the distribution of the international normalized ratio (INR). RESULTS: This national multicenter cohort study enrolled 522 patients between June 2019 and May 2021, with 519 (99%) patients reaching the follow-up end point, including 260 (50%) in the non-web-based management group and 259 (50%) in the web-based management group. There were no observable differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 patient groups. The web-based management group had a significantly higher TTR than the non-web-based management group (82.4% vs 71.6%, P<.001), and a higher proportion of patients received effective anticoagulation management (81.2% vs 63.5%, P<.001). The incidence of minor bleeding events in the non-web-based management group was significantly higher than that in the web-based management group (12.1% vs 6.6%, P=.048). Between the 2 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of severe bleeding and thromboembolic and all-cause death events. In addition, compared with the non-web-based management group, the web-based management group had a lower proportion of INR in the extreme subtreatment range (17.6% vs 21.3%) and severe supertreatment range (0% vs 0.8%) and a higher proportion in the treatment range (50.4% vs 43.1%), with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional non-web-based outpatient management, web-based management via the Alfalfa app may be more beneficial because it can enhance patient anticoagulation management quality, lower the frequency of small bleeding events, and improve INR distribution.