Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo , Farmacoepidemiología , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Food and Drug Administration , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Results: A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year. Conclusion: The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EV-related AEs in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Farmacovigilancia , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Anciano de 80 o más Años , United States Food and Drug Administration , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
HepB-CpG is a licensed adjuvanted two-dose hepatitis B vaccine for adults, with limited data on exposure during pregnancy. We assessed the risk of pregnancy outcomes among individuals who received HepB-CpG or the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine ≤28 d prior to conception or during pregnancy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The pregnancy cohort included KPSC members aged ≥18 y who received ≥1 dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB-CpG or HepB-alum) at KPSC outpatient family or internal medicine departments from August 2018 to November 2020. We followed these individuals through electronic health records from the vaccination date until the end of pregnancy, KPSC health plan disenrollment, or death, whichever came first. Among 81 and 125 eligible individuals who received HepB-CpG and HepB-alum, respectively, live births occurred in 84% and 74%, spontaneous abortion occurred in 7% and 17% (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-1.00), and preterm birth occurred in 15% and 14% of liveborn infants (aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.47-1.99). No major birth defects were identified through 6 months of age. The study found no evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes for recipients of HepB-CpG in comparison to HepB-alum.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B , Resultado del Embarazo , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Adulto , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Adolescente , California/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to summarize medical device reports (MDRs) between 2012 and 2022 relating to ureteral stents within the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database maintained by The Food and Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS: MAUDE was analyzed for all MDRs relating to each FDA-approved ureteral stent. Event descriptions were reviewed and characterized into specific event types. Outcome measures include specific ureteral stent and reported events as detailed by the MDRs. Data is presented as number of specific event/total events. Pooled Relative risk was used to compare data. RESULTS: 2652 reports were retrieved in 10 years and a progressive rise in reported events was recorded. 831/2652 (31%) were reported as injury while 1810/2652 (68%) as malfunction of the ureteral stent and 4 events of death. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were stent break (627/2652: 23%); material problems (384/2652: 14%); calcification (222/2652: 8%); difficulty to insert, advance or remove the device (155/2652: 6%). Bard stents were associated with most material problems (19%), Resonance stents were associated with most difficulty to insert, advance or remove the device (9%) and calcification (15%) while filiform double pigtail stent set were associated with most breakage reports (56%) when compared to the other stents (PRR > 1, p < 0,05). CONCLUSIONS: According to MAUDE database the most frequent complications related to ureteral stents are breakage, material problems, calcification and difficulty to insert/advance/remove the device. As well Resonance ureteral stents seem to be associated with a higher risk of device problems.
Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Stents , United States Food and Drug Administration , Uréter , Stents/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Uréter/cirugía , Incidencia , Falla de Prótesis , Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de Productos ComercializadosRESUMEN
The E-Health Big Data Evidence Innovation Network (FeederNet) in Korea, based on the observational medical outcomes partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM), had 72.3% participation from tertiary hospitals handling severe diseases as of October 2022. While this contributes to the activation of multi-institutional research, concerns about the comprehensiveness of device data persist due to the adoption of national health insurance corporation (NHIC) claim codes as device identifiers in the medical device field. This study critically evaluated the effectiveness and compatibility of NHIC claim codes and unique device identifier (UDI) within FeederNet to identify the optimal identifier for efficient Post-market surveillance (PMS). Specifically, this study addressed three main questions: (1) the number of UDIs classified as NHIC-covered items, (2) the number of UDIs included in each NHIC claim code, and (3) the number of NHIC claim codes each UDI covers. Among the 1,979,655 UDIs registered domestically, only 36.02% (712,983) were classified as covered by National Health Insurance. NHIC-covered medical devices were limited to categories (A) medical devices, (B) medical supplies, and (C) dental materials, excluding most software and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). Multiple UDIs could be registered under a single NHIC claim code, and a single UDI could be registered under multiple NHIC claim codes. Only 32.62% (13,756/42,171) of NHIC claim codes had registered UDIs, with an average of 53 UDIs per claim code. Of the UDIs listed as NHIC covered, 92.39% (659,046/713,341) had one claim code, while 7.25% (51,652) had multiple claim codes. Additionally, 2643 UDIs were listed as NHIC covered but had no registered claim codes. Due to this complex relationship, NHIC claim code-based PMS may pool safe and unsafe models or disperse problematic models across multiple claim codes, leading to a lower problem rate or insignificant differences between claim codes, thus reducing signal detection sensitivity compared to UDI-based PMS. In conclusion, NHIC claim code-based PMS has limitations in granularity and signal detection sensitivity, necessitating the adoption of UDI-based PMS to address these issues. The UDI system can enhance the accuracy of medical device identification and tracking, playing a crucial role in generating real-world evidence (RWE) by integrating data from various sources. Future research should explore specific strategies for integrating and utilizing UDI with NHIC claim codes, contributing to the implementation of a more reliable and comprehensive PMS in Korea's healthcare system.
Asunto(s)
Programas Nacionales de Salud , República de Corea , Humanos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Equipos y SuministrosRESUMEN
To assess the safety of varicella vaccine (VarV) by conducting post-marketing surveillance on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in Jiangsu Province, China. METHODS: We utilized the AEFI Information System of mainland China to monitor and categorize adverse reactions associated with VarV. RESULTS: The incidence rate of AEFI was significantly higher after the first dose (48.79/100,000 doses) compared to the second dose (45.18/100,000 doses) (χ2 = 4.63, P = 0.031). Regional variations in AEFI incidence were observed within Jiangsu Province. Common reactions comprised 90.96% of AEFIs, while rare reactions and coincidental events accounted for 6.59% and 0.51%, respectively. Notably, there were no adverse events linked to vaccine quality, program errors, psychogenic reactions, or fatalities. Over 96% of AEFIs occurred within three days of VarV administration, with redness at the injection site (2.6 cm to 5 cm in diameter) being the most frequently observed symptom. CONCLUSION: VarV demonstrates a commendable safety profile. Although there was a slight increase in AEFI incidence between 2022 and 2023, common vaccine reactions were predominantly observed, and the rates of rare reactions remained very low.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , China/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Niño , Preescolar , Incidencia , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/epidemiología , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Well-designed observational postmarketing studies using real-world data (RWD) are critical in supporting an evidence base and bolstering public confidence in vaccine safety. This systematic review presents current research methodologies in vaccine safety research in postapproval settings, technological advancements contributing to research resources and capabilities, and their major strengths and limitations. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant articles published from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. Eligible studies were summarized overall by study design and other study characteristics (eg, country, vaccine studied, types of data source, and study population). An in-depth review of select studies representative of conventional or new designs, analytical approaches, or data collection methods was conducted to summarize current methods in vaccine safety research. FINDINGS: Out of 977 articles screened for inclusion, 135 were reviewed. The review shows that recent advancements in scientific methods, digital technology, and analytic approaches have significantly contributed to postapproval vaccine safety studies using RWD. "Near real-time surveillance" using large datasets (via collaborative or distributed databases) has been used to facilitate rapid signal detection that complements passive surveillance. There was increasing appreciation for self-controlled case-only designs (self-controlled case series and self-controlled risk interval) to assess acute-onset safety outcomes, artificial intelligence, and natural language processing to improve outcome accuracy and study timeliness and emerging artificial intelligence-based analysis to capture adverse events from social media platforms. IMPLICATIONS: Continued development in the area of vaccine safety research methodologies using RWD is warranted. The future of successful vaccine safety research, especially evaluation of rare safety events, is likely to comprise digital technologies including linking RWD networks, machine learning, and advanced analytic methods to generate rapid and robust real-world safety information.
Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Vacunas , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Vacunas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bivalent human papillomavirus HPV16/18-AS04 vaccine (Cervarix, GSK) offers direct protection against HPV16/18. Results from randomised controlled trials showed cross protective effects and suggested that declines in some closely related HPV types could be expected in a population with high vaccination coverage. AIM: To evaluate the evidence for cross-protection afforded by HPV16/18-AS04 from post-implementation surveillance in England, and how this complements clinical trial data and post-implementation observations in other countries. METHODS: Evidence of cross-protection in young women offered vaccination with HPV16/18-AS04 was gathered from HPV surveillance in England. Data from clinical trials and other post-implementation studies were reviewed. RESULTS: Surveillance using anonymised residual specimens in England found declines of 52.3%, 67.4% and 33.3% against grouped HPV-31/33/45 in 16-18, 19-21, and 22-24 year olds, respectively. Additionally, type-specific analysis found that the prevalence of HPV31 declined to below 1% across all age groups. Cross-protection has been monitored and maintained for over 10 years since the introduction of the vaccination programme. Cross-protection against HPV6/11 was not found in English surveillance outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surveillance of type-specific infections in vaccine-eligible populations in England has generated clear evidence of cross-protective effects from HPV16/18-AS04 vaccination against high-risk HPV 31/33/45 infections, consistent with other post-implementation observations and confirming and in some ways exceeding expectations from clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Protección Cruzada , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Protección Cruzada/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Vacunación , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Vigilancia de Productos ComercializadosRESUMEN
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) awards the breakthrough therapy designation to expedite development and review of therapeutics intended to treat serious conditions when preliminary clinical evidence demonstrates potential substantial improvement over existing therapies on clinically significant end points. Under the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, the FDA is required to publish and routinely update a list of surrogate markers to provide industry sponsors with indication-specific information about end points that were or may be considered for approval. Therapeutics that are granted breakthrough therapy designation can receive accelerated or traditional approval; however, little is known about those approved through the latter pathway, where postmarketing confirmatory studies are typically not required, regardless of the end point used. Objective: To evaluate the primary end points used in premarket pivotal trials supporting FDA breakthrough therapy-designated approvals and to determine whether postmarketing studies confirming efficacy were required for approvals based on pivotal trials using surrogate markers as primary end points. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Drugs@FDA database for all original breakthrough therapy-designated approvals from inception to December 31, 2023, in the US. The first designation was approved on November 1, 2013. Data analysis was performed in January 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the breakthrough therapy-designated indication approval pathways, the primary end points of pivotal efficacy trials, and their postmarketing requirements or commitments. Results: From 2013 to 2023, the FDA approved 157 original indications with breakthrough therapy designation. Of these, 52 (33%) were granted accelerated approval and 105 (67%) were granted traditional approval. All accelerated approvals were based on pivotal trials using surrogate markers as primary end points and had FDA-required postmarketing studies to confirm efficacy. Of these 52 indications, 51 (98%) were approved based on surrogate end points listed in the FDA table of surrogate end points for the same indication. Among traditional approvals, 61 (58%) were based on pivotal trials using surrogate markers as primary end points, of which 4 (7%) had FDA-required postmarketing studies to confirm efficacy and 39 (64%) were approved based on surrogate end points listed in the FDA table for the same indication. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of original FDA breakthrough therapy-designated approvals from 2013 to 2023, trials supporting these approvals often used surrogate markers as primary end points (even when not approved via accelerated approval) and lacked FDA-required postmarketing studies to verify clinical benefit. These findings suggest that requiring postmarketing studies for breakthrough therapy-designated indications approved based on surrogate markers, regardless of approval pathway, may increase patient and clinician certainty of the expected clinical benefit.
Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , United States Food and Drug Administration , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Determinación de Punto Final , BiomarcadoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to identify the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with UC in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This open-label, observational, prospective, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted at 22 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with moderate to severe active UC who received tofacitinib were included and followed up for up to 52 weeks. Tofacitinib was administered at a dosage of 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks, followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily at the investigator's discretion based on clinical evaluation according to the approved Korean label. Safety including adverse events (AEs) and effectiveness including clinical remission, clinical response, and endoscopic mucosal healing were evaluated. Safety analysis set was defined as all patients registered for this study who received at least one dose of tofacitinib according to the approved Korean label and followed up for safety data. Effectiveness analysis set included patients in the safety analysis set who were evaluated for overall effectiveness assessment and excluded patients who had received tofacitinib less than 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were enrolled, of whom 106 patients were included in the safety population. The median duration of treatment was 370 days and the treatment duration ranged from 16 to 684 days for the safety population. AEs occurred in 42 patients (39.6%). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 patients (6.6%) and of them, there were 2 cases of serious infections. These serious infections were reported as Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) in this study and no other AESI were reported. There were no cases of death during the study period. Clinical remission rates were 40.0%, 46.7%, 57.6%, and 55.1% at 8, 16, 24, and 52 weeks, and clinical response rates were 77.8%, 87.9%, 56.6%, and 81.4% at each visit, respectively. Endoscopic mucosal healing rates were 58.7% at 16 weeks and 46.2% at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib was effective in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC and the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib. This study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC in routine clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04071405, registered on 28 August 2019.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Piperidinas , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
Manufacturers of medical devices are legally required to carry out post-market surveillance and respond to any on-market complaints they receive about their device. When it comes to addressing use issues experienced on market, manufacturers often focus on revising the instructions for use (IFU) and labeling. One of the challenges with this approach is the potential need to re-validate via a human factors validation study, without knowing whether the changes made will be effective in addressing the identified issues. With populations becoming increasingly technically literate, there is now great potential to rethink the way we can support self-injection through digital and web-based tools. This paper introduces the potential of digital instructions to improve the user experience of self-injection and address known use issues, as well as the challenges of incorporating them in medical device design.
Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Etiquetado de Productos/normas , Equipos y Suministros/normas , Diseño de Equipo , InternetRESUMEN
In order to achieve precise risk control of medical devices, it is necessary to establish a scientific evaluation system throughout the entire life cycle of medical devices that focuses on risk identification and risk control. This study summarizes the medical device adverse event monitoring system of the US on regulatory agencies and regulatory law, adverse events reporting forms and time limits, adverse event database, adverse event report analysis and evaluation, as well as adverse event feedback and control. Furthermore, some examples are provided to illustrate the application of the MAUDE database in risk analysis, physical and mechanical performance research, and clinical evaluation of medical device registration and application materials.
Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros , Equipos y Suministros/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Seguridad de Equipos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Aprobación de Recursos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The presence of poor-quality medicines is becoming a public health threat in many parts of the world, particularly in developing countries. Antibiotics are among the most common anti-infective medicines that are highly prone to this problem. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of selected antibacterials that are marketed in Setit Humera and West Gondar Zones, North West Ethiopia, which are located on the Ethiopian side of the Ethiopia-Sudan-Eritrea border. METHODS: Seventy-one samples of the four antibacterial medicines (Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin, Amoxycillin, and Amoxycillin clavullanate combination) were collected from six sites in Setit Humera and West Gondar Zones, North West Ethiopia. A mystery shopping system was used for sample collection. Visual inspections and confirmation of the registration status were carried out using the joint WHO/FIP/USP checklist and the Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority's (EFDA's) Electronic Regulatory Information System (eRIS), respectively. Then Pharmacopeial methods (USP, BP) were employed to assess the physicochemical quality parameters. RESULTS: During the period of our data collection, the application status for registration in the eRIS system was checked. From 71 samples, 25.35% (18/71) were not registered, and 15.49% (11/71) were registered, but the license period had expired. Some samples (12.06% (17/71)) did not meet the visual inspection criteria. The physicochemical evaluation showed that all the samples studied met the quality specifications for the identification and hardness tests. However, concerning assay, dissolution, uniformity of dosage units, disintegration, and friability test parameters, 27.49% (23/71), 16.9% (12/71), and 14.08% (10/71), 2.82% (2/71) and 8.57% (3/35) of samples were found to be substandard, respectively. Overall, 56.33% (40/71) of the samples tested were of poor quality, failing to meet any one or more of the assessed parameters in this study. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that poor-quality antibacterial medicines are circulating in the study sites. Therefore, even if the area was affected by conflict at the time of the study, the regulatory bodies should focus on enforcing the necessary measures by collaborating with the regional and national regulatory medicine agencies to ensure that the antibacterial medicines available meet the required mandatory minimum standards.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Etiopía , Antibacterianos/análisis , Eritrea , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Control de CalidadRESUMEN
Importance: The Sentinel System is a key component of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) postmarketing safety surveillance commitment and uses clinical health care data to conduct analyses to inform drug labeling and safety communications, FDA advisory committee meetings, and other regulatory decisions. However, observational data are frequently deemed insufficient for reliable evaluation of safety concerns owing to limitations in underlying data or methodology. Advances in large language models (LLMs) provide new opportunities to address some of these limitations. However, careful consideration is necessary for how and where LLMs can be effectively deployed for these purposes. Observations: LLMs may provide new avenues to support signal-identification activities to identify novel adverse event signals from narrative text of electronic health records. These algorithms may be used to support epidemiologic investigations examining the causal relationship between exposure to a medical product and an adverse event through development of probabilistic phenotyping of health outcomes of interest and extraction of information related to important confounding factors. LLMs may perform like traditional natural language processing tools by annotating text with controlled vocabularies with additional tailored training activities. LLMs offer opportunities for enhancing information extraction from adverse event reports, medical literature, and other biomedical knowledge sources. There are several challenges that must be considered when leveraging LLMs for postmarket surveillance. Prompt engineering is needed to ensure that LLM-extracted associations are accurate and specific. LLMs require extensive infrastructure to use, which many health care systems lack, and this can impact diversity, equity, and inclusion, and result in obscuring significant adverse event patterns in some populations. LLMs are known to generate nonfactual statements, which could lead to false positive signals and downstream evaluation activities by the FDA and other entities, incurring substantial cost. Conclusions and Relevance: LLMs represent a novel paradigm that may facilitate generation of information to support medical product postmarket surveillance activities that have not been possible. However, additional work is required to ensure LLMs can be used in a fair and equitable manner, minimize false positive findings, and support the necessary rigor of signal detection needed for regulatory activities.
Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Registros Electrónicos de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To document and characterize COVID-19 cases involving pregnancy in the context of exposure to pharmaceutical products. METHODS: This retrospective case series analysis leveraged the Pfizer safety database containing worldwide adverse event data related to use of Pfizer products between October 1, 2019 and November 3, 2022. Selected Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (Version 25.0) Preferred Terms and subsequent clinical review were used to identify COVID-19 cases involving female patients who received Pfizer products during pregnancy and infants with intrauterine exposure to Pfizer products. FINDINGS: As of November 3, 2022, 504 pregnancy cases (426 maternal; 78 infants) were identified. Most maternal cases reported COVID-19 during the third trimester, and (when known) 52% of cases involved presentation or progression of severe COVID-19 with associated complications requiring hospitalization, and often intensive management (eg, mechanical ventilation, oxygen support) and emergent delivery. Twenty-three maternal cases were fatal; patients developed severe COVID-19 disease involving multisystem deterioration (eg, cardiopulmonary injury/decompensation, coagulopathies, septic/hemorrhagic shock) and frequently required risk-benefit decisions regarding maintaining/prolonging pregnancies to improve fetal viability while attempting to improve or stabilize maternal conditions or electing to either terminate pregnancies or induce emergent deliveries. Approximately 40% of maternal cases reported medical history involving at least one underlying condition (eg, diabetes, respiratory disorders, renal/hepatic disease, cardiac disease, obesity, autoimmune conditions) considered potentially associated with susceptibility to infection/adverse outcome of infection, or twin/triplet pregnancy, which may further complicate COVID-19 disease. Most cases with known fetal outcomes reported normal newborns including preterm/low birth weight infants, which occurred in many cases involving emergent preterm delivery due to deteriorating maternal conditions. The remaining smaller proportion of cases involved abnormal newborn/perinatal/postperinatal complications (eg, premature births, respiratory distress, alveolar damage, meconium aspiration with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy), intrauterine/neonatal death (due to multiple concurrent complications such as neonatal sepsis, hypoxemia/acute respiratory distress, potential cardiac damage, mucormycosis) and congenital anomaly (eg, intrauterine growth restriction in association with contracting COVID-19). Among infants tested within our dataset, 28 cases involved reference to infants who tested positive for COVID-19 infection at birth or shortly thereafter, with vertical transmission suspected only in 2 infants. IMPLICATION: This large retrospective case series provides additional perspectives regarding potential impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes, and its characterization of this case volume may contribute to the current information landscape related to COVID-19 in pregnancy. Further studies may be warranted to confirm the generalizability of our findings to the general pregnant patient population infected with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Recién Nacido , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: The US leads the world in bringing new medical products to market, but the ability to generate evidence to inform clinical practice in postmarket settings needs improvement. Although a diverse group of stakeholders is working to improve postmarket evidence generation, the role of private payers has been underappreciated. Observations: Payers are crucial allies in improving evidence generation because better data would better inform coverage decisions, their policies and practices influence the conduct of care and research, and their claims data are a source of real-world evidence used in medical product evaluation. In addition, payers have a stake in improving evidence generation because the kinds of evidence needed to inform health care and coverage decisions are often not available when a product enters the market and may not be generated without their involvement. Here, we describe several key steps payers could take to improve evidence generation, including participating in efforts to reduce administrative and financial barriers to the conduct of clinical trials, directly incentivizing evidence generation on high-priority questions by funding potential cost-saving trials, increasing engagement with the medical products industry on evidentiary needs for coverage decisions, and improving usability of claims data by reducing data lags and routinely recording unique device identifiers. Broad payer engagement with US Food and Drug Administration recommendations regarding evidence generation will ensure that the opportunities to participate in clinical research are extended to all communities and that evidence needed to inform care is generated in trials and surveillance systems that reflect the clinical reality across the US. Conclusions and Relevance: Increasing payer involvement in evidence generation can benefit all participants in the medical innovation ecosystem. The importance of payers in these efforts will continue to grow in response to imperatives to increase integration of care and research, engage a diverse set of communities in clinical research, and move toward alternative payment models.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Seguro de Salud , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/economía , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Sector Privado , Seguro de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: PINNACLE FLX (Protection Against Embolism for Nonvalvular AF Patients: Investigational Device Evaluation of the WATCHMAN FLX LAA Closure Technology) demonstrated improved outcomes and low incidence of adverse events with the WATCHMAN FLX device in a controlled setting. The National Cardiovascular Disease Registry's Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry was utilized to assess the safety and effectiveness of WATCHMAN FLX in contemporary clinical practice in the United States. METHODS: The WATCHMAN FLX Device Surveillance Post Approval Analysis Plan used data from the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry to identify patients undergoing WATCHMAN FLX implantation between August 2020 and September 2022. The key safety end point was defined as all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device or procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention between device implantation and hospital discharge. Major adverse events were reported at hospital discharge, 45 days, and 1 year. RESULTS: Among 97 185 patients in the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry undergoing WATCHMAN FLX, successful implantation occurred in 97.5% (n=94 784) of patients. The key safety end point occurred in 0.45% of patients. At 45 days post-procedure, all-cause death occurred in 0.81% patients, ischemic stroke in 0.23%, major bleeding in 3.1%, pericardial effusion requiring intervention in 0.50%, device-related thrombus in 0.44%, and device embolism in 0.04% patients. No peri-device leak was observed in 83.1% of patients at 45 days. At 1 year, the rate of all-cause death was 8.2%, the rate of any stroke was 1.5% (ischemic stroke, 1.2%), and major bleeding occurred in 6.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a large contemporary cohort of patients with the WATCHMAN FLX device, the rates of implant success and clinical outcomes through 1 year were comparable with the PINNACLE FLX study, demonstrating that favorable outcomes achieved in the pivotal approval study can be replicated in routine clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Dispositivos de Protección Embólica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Diseño de Prótesis , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Upadacitinib is indicated for diseases affecting persons of childbearing potential including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, atopic dermatitis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis; however, teratogenicity was observed in animal studies. Given the potential for human fetal risk, pregnancy avoidance measures were required during clinical trials. This analysis describes pregnancy outcomes in patients exposed to upadacitinib during pregnancy. METHODS: Clinical trial and postmarketing cases of in utero exposure to upadacitinib were identified in AbbVie's safety database through 25 April, 2023. Analysis of clinical trial cases and postmarketing reports are presented separately; prospective and retrospectively reported pregnancy outcomes are integrated for each. Descriptive rates are presented to summarize outcomes. RESULTS: There were 128 maternal upadacitinib-exposed pregnancies with known outcomes identified; 80 and 48 pregnancies were reported in clinical trials and the postmarketing setting, respectively. In clinical trials (mean in utero exposure of 5 weeks, 3 days), live births (54%), spontaneous abortions (24%), elective terminations (21%), and ectopic pregnancy (1%) were reported. There was one report of a congenital malformation: a 35-week infant with an atrial septal defect. In postmarketing cases, live births (46%), spontaneous abortions (38%), elective terminations (15%), and ectopic pregnancy (2%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: As the data are limited for in utero exposure to upadacitinib, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the effect of upadacitinib on pregnancy outcomes. Rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes with upadacitinib exposure were comparable to rates observed in the general population or patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases. To date, no apparent evidence of teratogenicity exists in the analyses of human pregnancies exposed to upadacitinib during the first trimester.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos , Resultado del Embarazo , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The use of cannabis-based medicine (CBM) as a therapeutic has surged in Australia over the past 5 years. Historically, the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961) prohibited cannabis use in Europe, the USA, the UK and Australia, leading to legislative resistance and limited preclinical data on CBM. Existing safety monitoring systems for CBM are poorly structured and do not integrate well into the workflows of busy health professionals. As a result, postmarketing surveillance is inconsistent. This review aims to evaluate international systems for monitoring CBM side effects and adverse events. DESIGN: To undertake a scoping review with a systematic approach, we used the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework to develop keyword elements, and two search queries to maximise search sensitivity and specificity. DATA SOURCES: Search queries were entered into Embase and Scopus for peer-reviewed literature, and additional searches for grey literature were conducted on 23 June 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included 54 full-text articles in the review: 39 from peer-reviewed searches, 8 from grey literature and 7 from citations of relevant texts. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Our search yielded two main forms of monitoring systems: databases and registries. Out of the 24 monitoring systems identified, there were 10 databases and 14 registries, with databases often created by regulatory authorities. Systems differed in methods of causality assessment, level of detail collected, terminology and affiliations. RESULTS: Within the monitoring systems with enough published data for analysis, all except one remain active at the time of this review. VigiBase is the largest centralised monitoring system, receiving international case reports, however data heterogeneity persists. CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasises the need for a centralised, consistent and accessible system for the postmarketing surveillance of side effects and adverse events associated with medicinal cannabis use.