Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 995
Filtrar
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 7954, 2024 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261482

RESUMEN

In the phase 3 Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE) trial (NCT04470427), post-dose two Ancestral Spike-specific binding (bAb) and neutralizing (nAb) antibodies were shown to be correlates of risk (CoR) and of protection against Ancestral-lineage COVID-19 in SARS-CoV-2 naive participants. In the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron era, Omicron subvariants with varying degrees of immune escape now dominate, seropositivity rates are high, and booster doses are administered, raising questions on whether and how these developments affect the bAb and nAb correlates. To address these questions, we assess post-boost BA.1 Spike-specific bAbs and nAbs as CoRs and as correlates of booster efficacy in COVE. For naive individuals, bAbs and nAbs inversely correlate with Omicron COVID-19: hazard ratios (HR) per 10-fold marker increase (95% confidence interval) are 0.16 (0.03, 0.79) and 0.31 (0.10, 0.96), respectively. In non-naive individuals the analogous results are similar: 0.15 (0.04, 0.63) and 0.28 (0.07, 1.08). For naive individuals, three vs two-dose booster efficacy correlates with predicted nAb titer at exposure, with estimates -8% (-126%, 48%), 50% (25%, 67%), and 74% (49%, 87%), at 56, 251, and 891 Arbitrary Units/ml. These results support the continued use of antibody as a surrogate endpoint.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Eficacia de las Vacunas
2.
PLoS One ; 19(9): e0307936, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226256

RESUMEN

mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines have played a critical role in reducing severe outcomes of COVID-19. Humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination have been extensively studied in blood; however, limited information is available on the presence and duration of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in saliva and other mucosal fluids. Saliva offers a non-invasive sampling method that may also provide a better understanding of mucosal immunity at sites where the virus enters the body. Our objective was to evaluate the salivary immune response after vaccination with the COVID-19 Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. Two hundred three staff members of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were enrolled prior to receiving their first dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Participants were asked to self-collect 6 saliva specimens at days 0 (prior to first dose), 14, 28 (prior to second dose), 42, and 56 using a SalivaBio saliva collection device. Saliva specimens were tested for anti-spike protein SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA and IgG enzyme immunoassays. Overall, SARS-CoV-2-specific salivary IgA titers peaked 2 weeks after each vaccine dose, followed by a sharp decrease during the following weeks. In contrast to IgA titers, IgG antibody titers increased substantially 2 weeks after the first vaccine dose, peaked 2 weeks after the second dose and persisted at an elevated level until at least 8 weeks after the first vaccine dose. Additionally, no significant differences in IgA/IgG titers were observed based on age, sex, or race/ethnicity. All participants mounted salivary IgA and IgG immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 after receiving the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. Because of the limited follow-up time for this study, more data are needed to assess the antibody levels beyond 2 months after the first dose. Our results confirm the potential utility of saliva in assessing immune responses elicited by immunization and possibly by infection.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunoglobulina A , Inmunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2 , Saliva , Vacunación , Humanos , Saliva/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoglobulina A/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina A/análisis , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Adulto Joven , Inmunidad Mucosa/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología
3.
Vaccine ; 42(24): 126250, 2024 Oct 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226789

RESUMEN

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are particularly at risk of developing severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), but are also difficult to protect by vaccination due to their immunocompromised state. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in LTRs who had a prior natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. At a median of 184 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, LTRs were vaccinated twice with the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine, with a 28-day interval. Blood samples were obtained pre-vaccination, 28 days after the first dose, and 28 days and 6 months after the second dose. Spike (S-) and nucleocapsid (N-) specific antibodies were measured, as well as neutralization of the ancestral and Omicron BA.5 variant. S-specific T cell responses were evaluated using IFN-γ ELISpot,IGRA, and activation markers by flow cytometry. Phenotyping of T cells was performed by using high-resolution spectral flow cytometry. Most LTRs with prior infection had detectable S-specific antibodies and T cells at baseline. After the first vaccination, S-specific antibody levels increased significantly; an additional increase was observed after the second vaccination. N-specific antibodies decreased during the study period, indicative of the fact that no further breakthrough infections occurred. An increase in IFN-γ producing T cells was observed after the first vaccination, but no additional boost could be detected after the second vaccination. Antibody levels and virus-specific T cell responses remained significantly higher compared to pre-vaccination levels at 6 months post-vaccination, indicating an additive and durable effect of vaccination after infection in LTRs. Neutralizing antibodies were detected against the ancestral strain and retained cross-reactivity with Omicron BA.5, albeit at lower levels. Moreover, the quantity and phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cells were similar in LTRs compared to controls with hybrid immunity. In conclusion, mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are immunogenic in LTRs with prior immunity, and antibody and T cell responses are durable up to 6 months post-vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Pulmón , SARS-CoV-2 , Linfocitos T , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Adulto , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Anciano , Vacunación , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal
4.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 862-878, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39234779

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is an integral pillar of the public health approach to COVID-19. With the emergence of variants of concern that increase transmissibility and escape from vaccine- or infection-induced protection, vaccines have been developed to more closely match the newly circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains to improve protection. The safety and immunogenicity of multiple authorized messenger RNA (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccines targeting the omicron sublineage (BA.1, BA.4/BA.5, and XBB.1.5) have been demonstrated in several clinical trials among adults and children. AREAS COVERED: This review will comprehensively detail the available evidence (published through July 2024) from ongoing clinical trials on omicron variant-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines administered as additional doses in previously vaccinated target demographics. EXPERT OPINION: Across three clinical trials, omicron variant-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines induced immune responses to vaccine-matched omicron strains as well as ancestral SARS-CoV-2, with a safety and reactogenicity profile comparable to the original mRNA-1273 vaccine. Combined with pivotal data demonstrating the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of the original mRNA-1273 vaccine, these findings support the use of variant-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines and provide confidence that expeditious development of updated vaccines using this established mRNA platform can maintain protection against COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Adulto , Niño
5.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1447555, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39257577

RESUMEN

Introduction: Research has confirmed the safety and comparable seroconversion rates following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with solid cancers. However, the impact of cancer treatment on vaccine-induced T cell responses remains poorly understood. Methods: In this study, we expand on previous findings within the VOICE trial by evaluating the functional and phenotypic composition of mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses in patients with solid tumors undergoing immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or both, compared to individuals without cancer. We conducted an ELISpot analysis on 386 participants to assess spike-specific T cell responses 28 days after full vaccination. Further in-depth characterization of using flow cytometry was performed on a subset of 63 participants to analyze the functional phenotype and differentiation state of spike-specific T cell responses. Results: ELISpot analysis showed robust induction of spike-specific T cell responses across all treatment groups, with response rates ranging from 75% to 80%. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a distinctive cytokine production pattern across cohorts, with CD4 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2, and CD8 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and CCL4. Variations were observed in the proportion of monofunctional CD4 T cells producing TNF, particularly higher in individuals without cancer and patients treated with chemotherapy alone, while those treated with immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy predominantly produced IFNγ. Despite these differences, polyfunctional spike-specific memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were comparable across cohorts. Notably, immunotherapy-treated patients exhibited an expansion of spike-specific CD4 T cells with a terminally differentiated effector memory phenotype. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that systemic treatment in patients with solid tumors does not compromise the quality of polyfunctional mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses. This underscores the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancers undergoing systemic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , COVID-19 , Células T de Memoria , Neoplasias , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anciano , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Células T de Memoria/inmunología , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunación , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Memoria Inmunológica
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 768, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data on the dynamics and persistence of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after primary vaccination with two-dose inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) are limited. This study evaluated the sequential effects of prior infection, heterologous boosting with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and the occurrence of Omicron vaccine-breakthrough infection (VBI) thereafter. METHODS: We evaluated anti-spike IgG (Abbott) and neutralising (cPASS/GenScript) antibody (nAb) titers up to one year after mRNA-1273 boost in two-dose-CoronaVac-primed Indonesian healthcare workers (August 2021-August 2022). We used linear mixed modeling to estimate the rate of change in antibody levels, and logistic regression to examine associations between antibody levels and VBI. RESULTS: Of 138 participants, 52 (37.7%) had a prior infection and 78 (56.5%) received an mRNA-1273 booster. After two-dose CoronaVac, antibody titers had significantly declined within 180 days, irrespective of prior infection. After mRNA-1273 booster, anti-spike IgG (1.47% decline/day) and Omicron B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs declined between day 28-90, and IgG titers plateaued between day 90-360. During the BA.1/BA.2 wave (February-March 2022), 34.6% (27/78) of individuals experienced a VBI (median 181 days after mRNA-1273), although none developed severe illness. VBI was associated with low pre-VBI anti-spike IgG and B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs, which were restored post-VBI. CONCLUSIONS: mRNA-1273 booster after two-dose CoronaVac did not prevent BA.1/BA.2 VBI. Periodic vaccine boosters may be warranted against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Infección Irruptiva , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Infección Irruptiva/epidemiología , Infección Irruptiva/inmunología , Infección Irruptiva/prevención & control , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Personal de Salud , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Indonesia/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Vacunación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación
7.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 6603, 2024 Aug 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097574

RESUMEN

Vaccine responsiveness is often reduced in older adults. Yet, our lack of understanding of low vaccine responsiveness hampers the development of effective vaccination strategies to reduce the impact of infectious diseases in the ageing population. Young-adult (25-49 y), middle-aged (50-64 y) and older-adult ( ≥ 65 y) participants of the VITAL clinical trials (n = 315, age-range: 28-98 y), were vaccinated with an annual (2019-2020) quadrivalent influenza (QIV) booster vaccine, followed by a primary 13-valent pneumococcal-conjugate (PCV13) vaccine (summer/autumn 2020) and a primary series of two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccines (spring 2021). This unique setup allowed investigation of humoral responsiveness towards multiple vaccines within the same individuals over the adult age-range. Booster QIV vaccination induced comparable H3N2 hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers in all age groups, whereas primary PCV13 and mRNA-1273 vaccination induced lower antibody concentrations in older as compared to younger adults (primary endpoint). The persistence of humoral responses, towards the 6 months timepoint, was shorter in older adults for all vaccines (secondary endpoint). Interestingly, highly variable vaccine responder profiles overarching multiple vaccines were observed. Yet, approximately 10% of participants, mainly comprising of older male adults, were classified as low responders to multiple vaccines. This study aids the identification of risk groups for low vaccine responsiveness and hence supports targeted vaccination strategies. Trial number: NL69701.041.19, EudraCT: 2019-000836-24.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Inmunidad Humoral , Inmunización Secundaria , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunas Neumococicas , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Inmunidad Humoral/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Factores de Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunación , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación
8.
EBioMedicine ; 107: 105275, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39137572

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Understanding how SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections impacts the breadth of immune responses against existing and pre-emergent SARS-CoV-2 strains is needed to develop an evidence-based long-term immunisation strategy. METHODS: We performed a randomised, controlled trial to assess the immunogenicity of homologous (BNT162b2) versus heterologous (mRNA-1273) booster vaccination in 100 BNT162b2-vaccinated infection-naïve individuals enrolled from October 2021. Post hoc analysis was performed to assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on humoral and cellular immune responses against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and/or Omicron subvariants. FINDINGS: 93 participants completed the study at day 360. 71% (66/93) of participants reported first SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection by the end of the study with similar proportions of infections between homologous and heterologous booster groups (72.3% [34/47] vs 69.6% [32/46]; p = 0.82). Mean wildtype SARS-CoV-2 anti-S-RBD antibody level was significantly higher in heterologous booster group compared with homologous group at day 180 (14,588 IU/mL; 95% CI, 10,186-20,893 vs 7447 IU/mL; 4646-11,912; p = 0.025). Participants who experienced breakthrough infections during the Omicron BA.1/2 wave had significantly higher anti-S-RBD antibody levels against wildtype SARS-CoV-2 and antibody neutralisation against BA.1 and pre-emergent BA.5 compared with infection-naïve participants. Regardless of hybrid immunity status, wildtype SARS-CoV-2 anti-S-RBD antibody level declined significantly after six months post-booster or post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. INTERPRETATION: Booster vaccination with mRNA-1273 was associated with significantly higher antibody levels compared with BNT162b2. Antibody responses are narrower and decline faster among uninfected, vaccinated individuals. Boosters may be more effective if administered shortly before infection outbreaks and at least six months after last infection or booster. FUNDING: Singapore NMRC, USFDA, MRC.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Inmunidad Humoral , Vacunación/métodos , Anciano , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Infección Irruptiva
9.
J Virol ; 98(9): e0057424, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39194250

RESUMEN

Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impacts immunity and protection. Here, we boosted K18-hACE2 mice with either monovalent mRNA-1273 (Wuhan-1 spike) or bivalent mRNA-1273.214 (Wuhan-1 + BA.1 spike) vaccine in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg after a two-dose priming series with mRNA-1273. Boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg elicited equivalent levels of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody responses against Wuhan-1 and BA.1. While contralateral boosting with mRNA vaccines resulted in the expansion of spike-specific B and T cells beyond the ipsilateral draining lymph node (DLN) to the contralateral DLN, administration of a third mRNA vaccine dose at either site resulted in similar levels of antigen-specific germinal center B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, T follicular helper cells, and CD8+ T cells in the DLNs and the spleen. Furthermore, ipsilateral and contralateral boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.214 vaccines conferred similar homologous or heterologous immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 virus challenge with equivalent reductions in viral RNA and infectious virus in the nasal turbinates and lungs. Collectively, our data show limited differences in B and T cell immune responses after ipsilateral and contralateral site boosting by mRNA vaccines that do not substantively impact protection against an Omicron strain.IMPORTANCESequential boosting with mRNA vaccines has been an effective strategy to overcome waning immunity and neutralization escape by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it remains unclear how the site of boosting relative to the primary vaccination series shapes optimal immune responses or breadth of protection against variants. In K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, we observed that intramuscular boosting with historical monovalent or variant-matched bivalent vaccines in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb elicited comparable levels of serum spike-specific antibody and antigen-specific B and T cell responses. Moreover, boosting on either side conferred equivalent protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge strain. Our data in mice suggest that the site of intramuscular boosting with an mRNA vaccine does not substantially impact immunity or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Vacunas de ARNm , Animales , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Ratones , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacunas de ARNm/inmunología , Femenino , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Humanos , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/inmunología , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/genética , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/metabolismo
10.
Vaccine ; 42(23): 126221, 2024 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39180977

RESUMEN

Poor post-vaccination production of antibody against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a concern among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Furthermore, the timing and kinetics of antibody titers after the second vaccine dose are unknown. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study that included 614 SOT recipients: 460 kidney, 53 heart, 50 liver, 20 lung, and 31 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK). The participants received two doses of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273), as indicated. Serum samples were collected before the first and second vaccinations and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, which were then assessed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The overall seropositivity rate was 43% at 1 month after administration of the second vaccine dose; it gradually increased to 68% at 3 months after second dose administration and to 70% at 6 months. In addition, recipient of kidney, lung or SPK transplants had lower antibody titers at the 3- and 6-month time points than did the other recipients. SOT recipients acquired SARS-CoV-2 S-IgG antibodies slowly, and the peak titer differed significantly from that of the general population.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Vacunación
11.
Vaccine ; 42(23): 126237, 2024 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39182315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to slow transmission of SARS-CoV-2, but initial uptake of COVID-19 vaccination was slow. We analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial of the mRNA-1273 vaccine (NCT04811664) to describe the patterns of uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among young adults. METHODS: The CoVPN 3006 trial randomized adults ages 18-29 from 44 sites in the United States to receive 1) immediate mRNA-1273 vaccination from the study site, or 2) standard of care, including the option to seek vaccination at any time in the future. Randomization occurred between March and November 2021, and an observational arm of adults who declined vaccination was enrolled beginning June 2021. Among participants in the standard of care (SoC) or Vaccine Declined arms, we estimated demographic, behavioral, and health history correlates of vaccination, and the four-month cumulative incidence of COVID-19 vaccination using inverse probability weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators. RESULTS: Among 728 SoC and 470 Vaccine Declined participants, 79% and 16% received COVID-19 vaccination, respectively. SoC and Vaccine Declined participants were more likely to seek and receive vaccination if they reported COVID-19 preventive behaviors, including wearing masks, physically distancing, and avoiding large gatherings. We identified strong predictors of vaccination in the Vaccine Declined arm, including attending class in person (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21, 1.03), having a COVID-19 relevant medical condition (aRR: 1.95, 95% CI: 0.89, 4.26), and avoiding large gatherings (aRR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.25), though low vaccination rates in this arm led to imprecise estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who initially decline vaccination can be convinced to vaccinate, particularly if they are already practicing other forms of COVID-19 prevention. Continued outreach and education from the scientific community can combat low vaccine confidence.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología
12.
J Gene Med ; 26(9): e3733, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39183706

RESUMEN

The rapid development and authorization of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) in 2020 marked a significant milestone in human mRNA product application, overcoming previous obstacles such as mRNA instability and immunogenicity. This paper reviews the strategic modifications incorporated into these vaccines to enhance mRNA stability and translation efficiency, such as the inclusion of nucleoside modifications and optimized mRNA design elements including the 5' cap and poly(A) tail. We highlight emerging concerns regarding the wide systemic biodistribution of these mRNA vaccines leading to prolonged inflammatory responses and other safety concerns. The regulatory framework guiding the biodistribution studies is pivotal in assessing the safety profiles of new mRNA formulations in use today. The stability of mRNA vaccines, their pervasive distribution, and the longevity of the encapsulated mRNA along with unlimited production of the damaging and potentially lethal spike (S) protein call for strategies to mitigate potential adverse effects. Here, we explore the potential of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and ribonuclease targeting chimeras (RIBOTACs) as promising solutions to target, inactivate, and degrade residual and persistent vaccine mRNA, thereby potentially preventing uncontrolled S protein production and reducing toxicity. The targeted nature of siRNA and RIBOTACs allows for precise intervention, offering a path to prevent and mitigate adverse events of mRNA-based therapies. This review calls for further research into siRNA and RIBOTAC applications as antidotes and detoxication products for mRNA vaccine technology.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , ARN Interferente Pequeño , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Humanos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas de ARNm , Estabilidad del ARN , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Mensajero/inmunología , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/genética
13.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 7469, 2024 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39209823

RESUMEN

Primary vaccination with mRNA-1273 (100-µg) was safe and efficacious at preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the previously reported, blinded Part A of the phase 3 Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE; NCT04470427) trial in adults (≥18 years) across 99 U.S. sites. The open-label (Parts B and C) primary objectives were evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness of primary vaccination plus a 50-µg booster dose; immunogenicity was a secondary objective. Of 29,035 open-label participants, 19,609 received boosters (mRNA-1273 [n = 9647]; placebo-mRNA-1273 [n = 9952]; placebo [n = 10] groups). Booster safety was consistent with that reported for primary vaccination. Incidences of COVID-19 and severe COVID-19 were higher during the Omicron BA.1 than Delta variant waves and boosting versus non-boosting was associated with a significant, 47.0% (95% CI : 39.0-53.9%) reduction of Omicron BA.1 incidence (24.6 [23.4 - 25.8] vs 46.4 [40.6 - 52.7]/1000 person-months). In an exploratory Cox regression model adjusted for time-varying covariates, a longer median interval between primary vaccination and boosting (mRNA-1273 [13 months] vs placebo-mRNA-1273 [8 months]) was associated with significantly lower, COVID-19 risk (24.0% [16.0% - 32.0%]) during Omicron BA.1 predominance. Boosting elicited greater immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 than primary vaccination, irrespective of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary vaccination and boosting with mRNA-1273 demonstrated acceptable safety, effectiveness and immunogenicity against COVID-19, including emergent variants.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Vacunación , Adolescente
14.
Dermatol Online J ; 30(3)2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090041

RESUMEN

A unique dermatopathology incident arose after administration of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 (Moderna) vaccine. Specifically, a transient purpuric interface dermatitis occurred 5 days post-second vaccine with the presentation of erythematous papules with erythema multiforme-type findings. A patient developed purpuric interface dermatitis with micro-vesiculation post-vaccination which ultimately resolved without sequelae.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Eritema Multiforme , Humanos , Eritema Multiforme/inducido químicamente , Eritema Multiforme/patología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/efectos adversos , Femenino , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/patología , Masculino , COVID-19/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Púrpura/etiología , Púrpura/patología
15.
Exerc Immunol Rev ; 30: 63-70, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094182

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study analyses the immune response of elite athletes after COVID-19 vaccination with double-dose mRNA and a single-dose vector vaccine. Methods: Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titers, neutralizing activity, CD4 and CD8 T-cells were examined in blood samples from 72 athletes before and after vaccination against COVID-19 (56 mRNA (BNT162b2 / mRNA-1273), 16 vector (Ad26.COV.2) vaccines). Side effects and training time loss was also recorded. Results: Induction of IgG antibodies (mRNA : 5702 BAU/ml ; 4343 BAU/ml (hereafter: median), vector: 61 BAU/ml ; 52 BAU/ml, p<0.01), their neutralizing activity (99.7% ; 10.6%, p<0.01), and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4 T-cells (0.13% ; 0.05% ; p<0.01) after mRNA double-dose vaccines was significantly more pronounced than after a single-dose vector vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD8 T-cell levels after a vector vaccine (0.15%) were significantly higher than after mRNA vaccines (0.02%; p<0.01). When athletes who had initially received the vector vaccine were boostered with an mRNA vaccine, IgG antibodies (to 3456 BAU/ml; p<0.01), neutralizing activity (to 100%; p<0.01), CD4 (to 0.13%; p<0.01) and CD8 T-cells (to 0.43%; p<0.01) significantly increased. When compared with dual-dose mRNA regimen, IgG antibody response was lower (p<0.01), the neutralizing activity (p<0.01) and CD8 T-cell (p<0.01) response higher and no significant difference in CD4 T-cell response (p=0.54) between the two regimens. Cumulative training loss (3 days) did not significantly differ between vaccination regimens (p=0.46). Conclusion: mRNA and vector vaccines against SARSCoV-2 appear to induce different patterns of immune response in athletes. Lower immune induction after a single-shot vector vaccine was clearly optimized by a heterologous booster. Vaccine reactions were mild and short-lived.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Atletas , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Masculino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Femenino , Adulto , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología
16.
Int J Infect Dis ; 146: 107161, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992789

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and immunogenicity of a fourth vaccination (second booster) in individuals aged ≥75 years. METHODS: Participants were randomized to BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, 30 µg) or messenger RNA (mRNA)-1273 (Spikevax, 100 µg). The primary end point was the rate of two-fold antibody titer increase 14 days after vaccination, targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of wild-type SARS-CoV-2. The secondary end points included changes in neutralizing activity against wild-type and 25 variants. Safety was assessed by monitoring solicited adverse events (AEs) for 7 days. RESULTS: A total of 269 participants (mean age 81 years, mRNA-1273 n = 135/BNT162b2 n = 134) were included. Two-fold anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig) G titer increase was achieved by 101 of 129 (78%) and 116 of 133 (87%) subjects in the BNT162b2 and the mRNA-1273 group, respectively (P = 0.054). A second booster of mRNA-1273 provided higher anti-RBD IgG geometric mean titer: 21.326 IU/mL (95% confidence interval: 18.235-24.940) vs BNT162b2: 15.181 IU/mL (95% confidence interval: 13.172-17.497). A higher neutralizing activity was noted for the mRNA-1273 group. The most frequent AE was pain at the injection site (51% in mRNA-1273 and 48% in BNT162b2). Participants in the mRNA-1273 group had less vaccine-related AEs (30% vs 39%). CONCLUSIONS: A second booster of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 provided substantial IgG increase. Full-dose mRNA-1273 provided higher IgG levels and neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2, with similar safety profile for subjects of advanced age.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología
17.
Vaccine ; 42(21): 126132, 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034219

RESUMEN

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are recommended to receive at least three spike-antigen exposures to generate basic immunity and to mediate herd protection of vulnerable patients. So far, less attention has been put on the cellular immune response induced by homologous (three BTN162b2mRNA doses) or heterologous (mRNA-1273 as third dose building on two BTN162bmRNA doses) and the immunological impact of breakthrough infections (BTIs). Therefore, in 356 vaccinated HCWs with or without BTIs the Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-IgG concentrations and avidities and B- and T-cell-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2-Spike-S1- and Nucleocapsid-antigens were assessed with Interferon-gamma-ELISpot and by flow-cytometry. HCWs who had hybrid immunity due to BTIs exhibited strong T-cell-reactivity against the Spike-S1-antigen. A lasso regression model revealed a significant reduction in T-cell immune responses among smokers (p < 0.0001), with less significant impact observed for age, sex, heterologous vaccination, body-mass-index, Anti-Nucleocapsid T-cell reactivity, days since last COVID-19-immunization, and Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-IgG. Although subgroup analysis revealed higher Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-IgG after heterologous vaccination, similar cellular reactivity and percentages of Spike-reactive T- and B-cells were found between homologous and heterologous vaccination. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-IgG concentrations and avidity significantly correlated with activated T-cells. CD4 + and CD8 + responses correlated with each other. A strong long-term cellular immune response should be considered as baseline for recommendations of booster doses in HCWs with prioritization of smokers. HCWs presented significant T-cellular reactivity towards Spike-S1-antigen with particularly strong responses in hybrid immunized HCWs who had BTIs. HCWs without BTI presented similar percentages of Spike-specific B- and T-cells between homologous or heterologous vaccination indicating similar immunogenicity for both mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2mRNA and mRNA-1273.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Inmunidad Celular , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Humanos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Inmunidad Celular/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología
18.
Vaccine ; 42(25): 126117, 2024 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019657

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To overcome supply issues of COVID-19 vaccines, this partially single blind, multi-centric, vaccine trial aimed to evaluate humoral immunogenicity using lower vaccine doses, intradermal vaccination, and heterologous vaccine schedules. Also, the immunity after a booster vaccination was assessed. METHODOLOGY: 566 COVID-19-naïve healthy adults were randomized to 1 of 8 treatment arms consisting of combinations of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1-S. Anti-Receptor-Binding Domain immunoglobulin G (RBD IgG) titers, neutralizing antibody titres, and avidity of the anti-RBD IgGs was assessed up to 1 year after study start. RESULTS: Prolonging the interval between vaccinations from 28 to 84 days and the use of a heterologous BNT162b2 + mRNA-1273 vaccination schedule led to a non-inferior immune response, compared to the reference schedule. A low dose of mRNA-1273 was sufficient to induce non-inferior immunity. Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for intradermal vaccination. For all adapted vaccination schedules, anti-RBD IgG titres measured after a first booster vaccination were non-inferior to their reference schedule. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that reference vaccine schedules can be adapted without jeopardizing the development of an adequate immune response. Immunity after a booster vaccination did not depend on the dose or brand of the booster vaccine, which is relevant for future booster campaigns. The trial is registered in the European Union Clinical Trials Register (number 2021-001993-52) and on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06189040).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunidad Humoral , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Adulto Joven , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/inmunología , Método Simple Ciego , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Voluntarios Sanos , Vacunación/métodos
19.
Vaccine ; 42(25): 126113, 2024 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030080

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To compare the real-world effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA-1273 versus a third dose of BNT162b2 against breakthrough COVID-19 hospitalizations among adults aged ≥ 65 years who completed a primary series of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine (regardless of which primary series was received). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational comparative vaccine effectiveness (VE) study was conducted using administrative claims data from the US HealthVerity database (September 22, 2021, to August 31, 2022). A third dose of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 was assessed for preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations and medically attended COVID-19 among adults aged ≥ 65 years. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance baseline characteristics between vaccine groups. Incidence rates from patient-level data and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using weighted Cox proportional hazards models were calculated to estimate relative VE for each outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 94,587 and 92,377 individuals received a third dose of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2, respectively. Among the weighted population, the median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 66-74), 53 % were female, and 46 % were commercially insured. COVID-19 hospitalization rates per 1000 person-years (PYs) were 5.61 (95 % CI, 5.13-6.09) for mRNA-1273 and 7.06 (95 % CI, 6.54-7.57) for BNT162b2 (HR, 0.82; 0.69-0.98). Medically attended COVID-19 rates per 1000 PYs (95 % CI) were 95.05 (95 % CI, 93.03-97.06) for mRNA-1273 and 106.55 (95 % CI, 104.53-108.57) for BNT162b2 (HR, 0.93; 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this observational comparative VE database study provide evidence that among older adults, a third dose of mRNA-1273 was more effective in preventing breakthrough COVID-19 hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19 infection compared with a third dose of BNT162b2.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2 , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Estados Unidos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Eficacia de las Vacunas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años
20.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 6085, 2024 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39085208

RESUMEN

The first dose of COVID-19 vaccines led to an overall reduction in cardiovascular events, and in rare cases, cardiovascular complications. There is less information about the effect of second and booster doses on cardiovascular diseases. Using longitudinal health records from 45.7 million adults in England between December 2020 and January 2022, our study compared the incidence of thrombotic and cardiovascular complications up to 26 weeks after first, second and booster doses of brands and combinations of COVID-19 vaccines used during the UK vaccination program with the incidence before or without the corresponding vaccination. The incidence of common arterial thrombotic events (mainly acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke) was generally lower after each vaccine dose, brand and combination. Similarly, the incidence of common venous thrombotic events, (mainly pulmonary embolism and lower limb deep venous thrombosis) was lower after vaccination. There was a higher incidence of previously reported rare harms after vaccination: vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia after first ChAdOx1 vaccination, and myocarditis and pericarditis after first, second and transiently after booster mRNA vaccination (BNT-162b2 and mRNA-1273). These findings support the wide uptake of future COVID-19 vaccination programs.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Vacunación , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/efectos adversos , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administración & dosificación , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Inmunización Secundaria/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Miocarditis/epidemiología , Miocarditis/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Trombosis/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Anciano de 80 o más Años
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA