RESUMEN

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), developed by Dr. Luiz Pimenta in 2006, allows access to the spinal column through the psoas major muscle. The technique has many advantages, such as reduced bone and muscular tissue damage, indirect decompression, larger implants, and lordosis correction capabilities. However, this technique also has drawbacks, with the most notorious being the risk of spinal pathologies due to indirect injury of the lumbar plexus, but with low rates of persistent injuries. Therefore, several groups have proposed classifications to help identify patients at a greater risk of presenting with neurological deficits. The present work proposes a classification system that relies on simple observation of easily identifiable key structures to guide lateral L4-L5 LLIF decision-making. Patients aged > 18 years who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2022 and 2023 were included until 50 high-quality images were acquired. And excluded as follow Anatomical changes in the vertebral body or major psoas muscles prevent the identification of key structures or poor-quality MRIs. Each anatomy was classified as type I, type II, or type III according to the consensus among the three observers. Fifty anatomical sites were included in this study. 70% of the L4-L5 anatomy were type I, 18% were type II, and 12% were type III. None of the type 3 L4-L5 anatomies were approached using a lateral technique. The proposed classification is an easy and simple method for evaluating the feasibility of a lateral approach to-L4-L5.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reasons for a second surgery after Percutaneous Endoscopic Surgery (PES) for lumbar spinal stenosis and to provide references for the choice of indications and appropriate surgical approach. METHOD: A total of 426 patients received PES for lumbar spinal stenosis. The postoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of the subjects were analyzed. The reasons for intraoperative difficulties, poor outcomes after surgery, and a second surgery were analyzed. RESULT: The surgical approach was changed in four out of 426 patients (0.94 %) during surgery, and 6 patients (1.4 %) received a second surgery; 3 out of 4 patients were intraoperatively shifted to PIED using the Delta endoscope, and 1 shifted to ordinary PIED. The reasons for the intraoperative change of surgical approach included severe hyperplasia and obscure anatomic structure in 3 patients and a dural sac tear with neural outflow in 1 patient. The reasons for a second surgery in 19 patients were as follows: nerve entrapment by bone fragments in 1 patient; nerve injury in 3 patients; lumbar instability in 3 patients; untreated or residual Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation (LIDH) in 4 patients; recurrent LIDH in 1 patient; and inadequate decompression in 7 patients. CONCLUSION: Severe hyperplasia, obscure anatomic structure, lumbar instability, and nerve injury are the common reasons for a second surgery after PES for lumbar spinal stenosis. Appropriate indications and surgical approaches can be chosen based on the patient's situations and technical conditions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The L5-S1 interlaminar access described in 2006 by Ruetten et al. represented a paradigm shift and a new perspective on endoscopic spinal approaches. Since then, the spinal community has shown that both the traditional ipsilateral and novel contralateral interlaminar approaches to the L5-S1 foramen are good alternatives to transforaminal access. This study aimed to provide a technical description and brief case series analysis of a new endoscopic foraminal and extraforaminal approach for pathologies at the lumbar L5-S1 level using a new ipsilateral interlaminar approach. METHODS: Thirty patients with degenerative stenotic conditions at the L5-S1 disc level underwent the modified interlaminar approach. The surgical time, blood loss, occurrence of complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. The data were compiled in Excel and analyzed using R software version 4.2. All continuous variables are presented as the mean, median, minimum, and maximal ranges. For categorical variables, data are described as counts and percentages. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study. The cohort showed significant improvements in all quality-of-life scores (ODI, visual analog scale of back pain, and visual analog scale of leg pain). Five cases of postoperative numbness and three cases of postoperative dysesthesia have been reported. No case of durotomy or leg weakness has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: The fundamental change proposed by this procedure, the new ipsilateral approach, presents potential advantages to surgeons by overcoming anatomical challenges at the L5-S1 level and by providing surgeon-friendly visualization and access. This approach allows for extensive foraminal and extraforaminal decompression, including the removal of hernias and osteophytosis, without causing neural retraction of the L5-S1 roots while maintaining the stability of the operated level.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The prone transpsoas technique (PTP) is a modification of the traditional lateral lumbar interbody fusion approach, which was first published in the literature in 2020. The technique provides several advantages, such as lordosis correction and redistribution, single-position surgery framework, and ease of performing posterior techniques when needed. However, the prone position also leads to the movement of some retroperitoneal, vascular, and neurological structures, which could impact the complication profile. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of major complications in the practice of early adopters of the PTP approach. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 8 questions was sent to 50 participants and events involving early adopters of the prone transpsoas technique. Of the 50 surgeons, 32 completed the questionnaire, which totaled 1963 cases of PTP surgeries. RESULTS: Nine of the 32 surgeons experienced a major complication (28%), with persistent neurological deficit being the most frequent (7/9). Of the total number of cases, the occurrence of permanent neurological deficits was approximately 0,6%, and the rate of vascular and visceral injuries were both 0,05% (1/1963 for each case). CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis of the questionnaire responses, it can be concluded that PTP is a safe technique with a very low rate of serious complications. However, future studies with a more heterogeneous group of surgeons and a more rigorous linkage between answers and patient data are needed to support the findings of this study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical-surgical results of the tubular vs. mini-open approach in lumbar discoidectomy. The tubular approach promises to reduce the number of rest days and an earlier return to daily activities and work. METHOD: A case-control study of patients operated on for disc herniation using tubular surgery (case) and mini-open (control) was carried out. The variables investigated were as follow: radicular and lumbar pain, sex, age, failure in conservative treatment, single-level lumbar hernia, surgical time, bleeding, length of hospital stay, persistence of symptoms, complications, occupational activity, and reintegration into everyday activities. RESULTS: Through 100 surgeries performed, two groups were created, tubular and mini-open, with 50 patients each, with L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc herniation, respectively. The most affected level was L4-L5 (69%). Of the total cases, a significant improvement was found (p < 0.05) at 15 postoperative days in the VAS and ODI scale in the tubular group with respect to mini-open. Complications such as surgical wound infection, durotomy, and persistent pain occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The tubular approach is a safe and effective option for herniated discs of the lumbar segment, and reduces surgical times, bleeding, and the time of reinsertion to daily activities of the patient.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar los resultados clínico-quirúrgicos del abordaje tipo tubular en comparación con el mini-open en la discoidectomía lumbar. El abordaje tubular promete reducir el número de días de reposo y una reincorporación más temprana a las actividades diarias y laborales. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio de casos y controles de pacientes operados por hernia discal mediante cirugía tubular (casos) o mini-open (controles). Las variables investigadas fueron: dolor radicular y lumbar, sexo, edad, falla en el tratamiento conservador, hernia lumbar de un solo nivel, tiempo quirúrgico, sangrado, tiempo de estancia hospitalaria, persistencia de síntomas, complicaciones, tipo de actividad ocupacional y reinserción a las actividades cotidianas. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 100 cirugías y se crearon dos grupos, tubular y mini-open, con 50 pacientes cada uno, con hernia discal de L4-L5 o L5-S1, respectivamente. El nivel más afectado fue L4-L5 (69%). Del total de los casos, se encontró mejoría significativa (p < 0.05) a los 15 días posquirúrgicos en la escala EVA y ODI en el grupo tubular con respecto al mini-open. Ocurrieron complicaciones como infección de herida quirúrgica, durotomía y dolor persistente. CONCLUSIONES: El abordaje tubular es una opción segura y efectiva para hernias discales del segmento lumbar, y reduce los tiempos quirúrgicos, el sangrado y el tiempo de reinserción a las actividades cotidianas del paciente.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: surgical site infections (SSI) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and one of the most representative causes of nosocomial infections. The use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spine surgery is a potential prophylactic measure against SSI; however, evidence regarding its efficacy is contradictory. Our study was designed to research if intrawound vancomycin significantly prevents SSI in lumbar spine surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial; 233 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery, were randomly assigned to a group in which intrawound vancomycin was instilled in the incision before closure (109), or to a control group (114). The main outcome is the presence of SSI; we determined its prevalence and searched for difference between groups for association between SSI and independent variables. RESULTS: global SSI prevalence was 1.8%, in the experimental group was 0.9%, in the control group was 2.6%. There was no significant difference between these values, p = 0.622. The relative risk of SSI in the experimental group was 0.35 (95% CI 0.037-3.30), that of the control group was 2.87 (95% CI 0.30-27.16). The number needed to treat is 58.3. We did not find a significant association between the independent variables studied and the appearance of SSI. CONCLUSIONS: we did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of SSI between groups nor a significant association between SSI and independent variables.

INTRODUCCIÓN: las infecciones postoperatorias del sitio quirúrgico son una importante causa de morbimortalidad y una de las formas más comunes de infecciones nosocomiales. La aplicación de vancomicina al terminar una intervención de columna lumbar es una potencial práctica profiláctica de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ). La evidencia que sostiene su uso es controversial. Nuestro estudio investiga si la aplicación de vancomicina disminuye en forma significativa la prevalencia de ISQ. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: ensayo clínico aleatorizado, controlado, cegado; 223 pacientes intervenidos de la columna lumbar fueron aleatoriamente asignados a un grupo experimental de 109 pacientes en quienes se colocó vancomicina y a un grupo control de 114 pacientes que no recibió vancomicina. El principal desenlace del estudio es la aparición de ISQ; se estudió la prevalencia de ISQ en ambos grupos y se buscó si existe diferencia significativa. Se analizó la existencia de factores predictores de ISQ. RESULTADOS: la prevalencia global de infección fue 1.8%; en el grupo experimenta 0.09% y en el grupo control 2.6%. No hubo diferencia significativa entre estas cifras, p = 0.622. El riesgo relativo de ISQ en el grupo experimental fue 0.35 (IC95% 0.037-3.30), el del grupo control fue 2.87 (IC95% 0.30-27.16). El número necesario para tratar es 58.3. No encontramos asociación significativa entre las variables independientes estudiadas y la aparición de ISQ. CONCLUSIONES: no encontramos evidencia suficiente de que la aplicación de vancomicina disminuya significativamente la prevalencia de ISQ ni asociación significativa de ISQ con las variables independientes estudiadas.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Degenerative lumbar spine disease is the leading cause of disability and work absenteeism worldwide. Lumbar microdiscectomy became the standard treatment for herniated discs and stenotic disease. With the evolution of different techniques, endoscopic spinal surgery emerged to minimize the surgical footprint while providing at least non-inferior results. Currently, two different types of endoscopic spine procedures are dominating the surgical scenario: "Full-Endoscopic" (FE) and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic" (UBE) Spine Surgery. The aim of this study is to describe and analyze their indications, their technical characteristicswithitsadvantagesanddisadvantagesofbothtechniquesandtheirfuture trends. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the most relevant articles published up to August 2023 through a Pub Med search. The search terms " FE Spine Surgery" and " UBE Spine Surgery" were used. The articles selected, were independently reviewed by 3 authors and 55 full text articles were reviewed. RESULTS: The FE and UBE Spine Surgery techniques were described. The FE technique is performed with a monoportal access under constant saline irrigation. The FE comprises the transforaminal and the interlaminar approaches, and the indication depends from the pathology to treat, and still remains controversial. UBE can approach also the spine from a posterior, postero lateral,and para spinal route. It uses two different ports addressed to a target with continuous irrigation. The process of establishing these two portals is called triangulation. CONCLUSIONS: FE and UBE spine surgery have demonstrated outcomes comparable to open surgery, minimizing complications and surgical footprint.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the effects of microscopic microdiscectomy and microendoscopic discectomy on pain, disability, fear of falling, kinesiophobia, anxiety, quality of life in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent microscopic microdiscectomy (n = 40) and microendoscopic discectomy (n = 50) for LDH were included in this study. The patients' pain, disability, fear of falling, kinesiophobia, anxiety, and quality of life were evaluated before the surgery, in the early postoperative period and three months after. RESULTS: In patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy, the results of pain, disability, fear of falling, kinesiophobia and anxiety were statistically decreased compared with the microscopic microdiscectomy in the early postoperative period and three months later (p < 0.05). Also, a statistically higher increase was observed in the general health perception of patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy three months after the operation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Microendoscopic microdiscectomy, remains the most effective and widely applied method with advantages on pain, quality of life, and improved physical functions.

OBJETIVO: Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los efectos de la microdiscectomía microscópica y la discectomía microendoscópica sobre el dolor, la discapacidad, el miedo a caer, la kinesiofobia, la ansiedad y la calidad de vida en pacientes con hernia de disco lumbar (LDH). MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron en este estudio un total de 90 pacientes sometidos a microdiscectomía microscópica (n = 40) y discectomía microendoscópica (n = 50) por LDH. Se evaluó el dolor, la discapacidad, el miedo a caer, la kinesiofobia, la ansiedad y la calidad de vida de los pacientes antes de la cirugía, en el postoperatorio temprano y tres meses después. RESULTADOS: En los pacientes sometidos a discectomía microendoscópica, los resultados de dolor, discapacidad, miedo a caer, kinesiofobia y ansiedad disminuyeron estadísticamente en comparación con la microdiscectomía microscópica en el postoperatorio temprano y tres meses después (p < 0.05). Además, se observó un aumento estadísticamente mayor en la percepción de salud general de los pacientes sometidos a discectomía microendoscópica tres meses después de la operación (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIÓN: La microdiscectomía microendoscópica sigue siendo el método más eficaz y ampliamente aplicado con ventajas sobre el dolor, la calidad de vida y la mejora de las funciones físicas.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a global epidemic affecting developing countries. The relationship between obesity and perioperative outcomes during elective lumbar spine surgery remains controversial, especially in those without morbid disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively revised the medical records of patients with lumbar spine degeneration subjected to elective surgery. The data retrieved included demographic and clinical characteristics, body mass index (BMI), obesity status (BMI ≥ 30), surgical interventions, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), and post-operative complications. Perioperative outcomes were compared between Grade I-II obese and non-obese individuals. RESULTS: We enrolled 53 patients, 18 with Grade I-II obesity. Their median age was 51, with no differences in gender, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and surgical procedures received between groups. No clinically relevant differences were found between grade I-II obese and non-obese participants in EBL (300 mL vs. 250 mL, p = 0.069), operative time (3.2 h vs. 3.0 h, p = 0.037), and LOS (6 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.3). Furthermore, BMI was not associated with the incidence of significant bleeding and long stay but showed a modest correlation with operative time. CONCLUSION: Grade I-II obesity does not increase surgical complexity nor perioperative complications during open lumbar spine surgery.

OBJETIVO: La obesidad es una epidemia mundial que afecta a países subdesarrollados. Su relación con los resultados de la cirugía de columna lumbar electiva sigue siendo controvertida, especialmente en obesos sin enfermedad mórbida. MÉTODOS: Se revisaron los expedientes de pacientes con degeneración de la columna lumbar sometidos a cirugía. Los datos recuperados incluyeron características demográficas y clínicas, índice de masa corporal (IMC), estado de obesidad (IMC > 30), intervenciones quirúrgicas, sangrado estimado, tiempo operatorio, tiempo de estancia y complicaciones. Los resultados se compararon entre individuos obesos grado I-II y controles. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 53 pacientes, 18 con obesidad de grado I-II. La edad media fue de 51 años, sin diferencias en el sexo, las comorbilidades, los parámetros de laboratorio y los procedimientos quirúrgicos recibidos entre grupos. No se encontraron diferencias relevantes entre los participantes obesos y los no obesos en sangrado (300 vs. 250 mL, p = 0.069), tiempo operatorio (3.2 vs. 3.0 horas, p = 0.037) y estancia (6 vs. 5 días, p = 0.3). El IMC no se asoció con hemorragia y larga estancia, pero mostró una correlación modesta con el tiempo operatorio. CONCLUSIONES: La obesidad grado I-II no predispone a complicaciones durante la cirugía de columna lumbar.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, anatomical imaging study of healthy volunteer subjects in accurate surgical positions. OBJECTIVE: To establish if there is a change in the position of the abdominal contents in the lateral decubitus (LD) versus prone position. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the LD position has been validated anatomically and for procedural safety, specifically in relation to visceral risks. Recently, LLIF with the patient in the prone position has been suggested as an alternative to LLIF in the LD position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral region in the right LD position with the hips flexed and the prone position with the legs extended. Anatomical measurements were performed on axial magnetic resonance images at the L4-5 disc space. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects were included. The distance from the skin to the lateral disc surface was 134.9 mm in prone compared with 118.7 mm in LD ( P <0.0001). The distance between the posterior aspect of the disc and the colon was 20.3 mm in the prone compared with 41.1 mm in LD ( P <0.0001). The colon migrated more posteriorly in relation to the anterior margin of the psoas in the prone compared with LD (21.7  vs . 5.5 mm, respectively; P <0.0001). 100% of subjects had posterior migration of the colon in the prone compared with the LD position, as measured by the distance from the quadratum lumborum to the colon (44.4  vs . 20.5 mm, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSION: There were profound changes in the position of visceral structures between the prone and LD patient positions in relation to the LLIF approach corridor. Compared with LD LLIF, the prone position results in a longer surgical corridor with a substantially smaller working window free of the colon, as evidenced by the significant and uniform posterior migration of the colon. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for increased visceral risks when performing LLIF in the prone position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective anatomical cohort study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lumbosacral plexus schwannomas (LSPSs) are benign, slow-growing tumors that arise from the myelin sheath of the lumbar or sacral plexus nerves. Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic LSPSs. Conventional retroperitoneal or transabdominal approaches provide wide exposure of the lesion but are often associated with complications in the abdominal wall, lumbar or sacral plexus, ureter, and intraperitoneal organs. Advances in technology and minimally invasive (MIS) techniques have provided alternative approaches with reliable efficacy compared with traditional open surgery. We describe 3 MIS approaches using tubular retractor systems according to the lesion level. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study to evaluate the use of MIS tubular approaches for surgical resection of LSPSs. We included 23 lumbar and upper sacral plexus schwannomas. Clinical presentation, spinal level, surgical duration, degree of resection, days of hospitalization, pathological anatomy of the tumor, approach-related surgical difficulties, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The posterior oblique approach was used in 43.5% of the cases, the transpsoas approach in 39.1%, and the transiliac in 17.4%. The mean operative time was 3.3 hours, and the mean hospitalization was 2.5 days. All tumors were WHO grade 1 schwannoma. Postoperative MRI confirms gross total resection in 91.3% of the patients. No patient requires instrumentation. The pros and cons of each approach were summarized. CONCLUSION: The MIS approaches adapted to the lumbar level may improve surgeons' comfort allowing a safe resection of retroperitoneal LSPS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thirty years have passed since Kambin's first clinical series of lumbar disc herniations (LDH) treated by arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Despite several advances in this interim, sequestrated LDHs over the dorsal aspect of the dura, and high-grade up- or downward disc migration have been a relative limitation of the transforaminal endoscopic technique. The interlaminar window was the next step to deal with such highly migrated LDHs. Favorable outcomes were obtained in 70-90% of the patients in the long-term, but recurrence rates remained high (approximately 12%), and the approach could be limited by the size of the interlaminar window. Few relevant studies have addressed the role of translaminar full endoscopic technique for migrated LDHs. To describe an innovative modification of the translaminar full endoscopic approach with Tom Shidi needles. METHODS: This technical modification is presented in a detailed fashion for treating these challenging LDHs and illustrated through a clinical case. RESULTS: The patient underwent successful translaminar full endoscopic technique with complete pain resolution postoperatively. The postprocedural course was uneventful. A follow-up imaging showed no evidence of residual LDHs fragments. CONCLUSIONS: Translaminar full endoscopic technique with Tom Shidi needles is a promising modification of the previously presented interlaminar and translaminar endoscopic routes in the treatment of migrated LDHs to fasten surgical procedures and increase the safety of spinal canal manipulation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures with TLICS 4 classification are at the limit of surgical fixation with regards to conservative treatment; however, results in our environment are not known, which is why this study has innovative characteristics. Objective: To determine the quality of life in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation in a third level hospital. Material and methods: A cohort prospective study was carried out in patients with TLICS 4 classification thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation in beneficiaries from the Mexican Institute for Social Security. The SF-12 instrument, which assessed quality of life, was administered; age, sex, days of hospitalization, time of spinal cord injury were searched in the patients' medical history. It was used descriptive and inferential statistics using Student's t or Mann-Whitney U. Results: 20 patients participated and 9 had traditional fixation (45%). All patients had type E spinal cord injuries according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Mean age of non-fixation was 42.2 ± 12.9 and of fixation 44.9 ± 10.2; in non-fixation 6 (67%) were male. The quality of life score was 29.1 ± 0.9 in the conservative treatment and 28.7 ± 1.3 in the surgical treatment, p < 0.462. Conclusions: No differences in quality of life were observed in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation.

Introducción: los pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares con clasificación TLICS 4 se encuentran en el límite de la fijación quirúrgica con respecto al tratamiento conservador; sin embargo, resultados en nuestro medio no son conocidos, por lo que este estudio tiene características innovadoras. Objetivo: determinar la calidad de vida en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares clasificación TLICS 4, mediante fijación tradicional con respecto a no fijación en un hospital de tercer nivel. Material y métodos: estudio de cohorte prospectiva en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares clasificación TLICS 4 mediante fijación tradicional con respecto a no fijación en población derechohabiente del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). Se aplicó el instrumento SF-12, que evaluó la calidad de vida; se buscó en los expedientes de los pacientes edad, sexo, días de hospitalización, tiempo de lesión medular. Se usó estadística descriptiva e inferencial mediante t de Student o U de Mann Whitney. Resultados: participaron 20 pacientes y 9 (45%) tuvieron fijación tradicional. Todos los pacientes pertenecían a la clase E según las Normas Internacionales para la Clasificación Neurológica de lesiones de la médula espinal. Edad media de no fijación con 42.2 ± 12.9 y de fijación 44.9 ± 10.2; en no fijación, 6 (67%) eran varones. La puntuación de calidad de vida fue en el tratamiento conservador con 29.1 ± 0.9 y quirúrgico 28.7 ± 1.3, p < 0.462. Conclusiones: no se observaron diferencias en la calidad de vida en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares clasificación TLICS 4 mediante fijación tradicional y no fijación.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures with TLICS 4 classification are at the limit of surgical fixation with regards to conservative treatment; however, results in our environment are not known, which is why this study has innovative characteristics. Objective: To determine the quality of life in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation in a third level hospital. Material and methods: A cohort prospective study was carried out in patients with TLICS 4 classification thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation in beneficiaries from the Mexican Institute for Social Security. The SF-12 instrument, which assessed quality of life, was administered; age, sex, days of hospitalization, time of spinal cord injury were searched in the patients' medical history. It was used descriptive and inferential statistics using Student's t or Mann-Whitney U. Results: 20 patients participated and 9 had traditional fixation (45%). All patients had type E spinal cord injuries according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Mean age of non-fixation was 42.2 ± 12.9 and of fixation 44.9 ± 10.2; in non-fixation 6 (67%) were male. The quality of life score was 29.1 ± 0.9 in the conservative treatment and 28.7 ± 1.3 in the surgical treatment, p < 0.462. Conclusions: No differences in quality of life were observed in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation.

Introducción: los pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares con clasificación TLICS 4 se encuentran en el límite de la fijación quirúrgica con respecto al tratamiento conservador; sin embargo, resultados en nuestro medio no son conocidos, por lo que este estudio tiene características innovadoras. Objetivo: determinar la calidad de vida en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares clasificación TLICS 4, mediante fijación tradicional con respecto a no fijación en un hospital de tercer nivel. Material y métodos: estudio de cohorte prospectiva en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares clasificación TLICS 4 mediante fijación tradicional con respecto a no fijación en población derechohabiente del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). Se aplicó el instrumento SF-12, que evaluó la calidad de vida; se buscó en los expedientes de los pacientes edad, sexo, días de hospitalización, tiempo de lesión medular. Se usó estadística descriptiva e inferencial mediante t de Student o U de Mann Whitney. Resultados: participaron 20 pacientes y 9 (45%) tuvieron fijación tradicional. Todos los pacientes pertenecían a la clase E según las Normas Internacionales para la Clasificación Neurológica de lesiones de la médula espinal. Edad media de no fijación con 42.2 ± 12.9 y de fijación 44.9 ± 10.2; en no fijación, 6 (67%) eran varones. La puntuación de calidad de vida fue en el tratamiento conservador con 29.1 ± 0.9 y quirúrgico 28.7 ± 1.3, p < 0.462. Conclusiones: no se observaron diferencias en la calidad de vida en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares clasificación TLICS 4 mediante fijación tradicional y no fijación.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this randomized and prospective research, we aimed to relieve surgical and muscle-related pain early after lumbar disc operations with caudal preemptive analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation were included in this study. The caudal epidural injection was performed for all patients 20 min before surgery. The patients were divided into three groups. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or tramadol use were recorded. Pre-operative and post-operative pain was interpreted through a visual analog scale. RESULTS: There was a difference between the groups in all post-operative measurements (p < 0.05), between Group 1 and Group 3, and between Group 2 and Group 3. A statistical significance has been achieved between the groups at the 1st h, 2nd h, 4th h, and 24th h (p < 0.05). The difference between the pain intensities of the patients at the 24th h and the 1st week was statistically significant in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Evaluation of the effects of medical treatments reduced the severity of back pain and foot pain. CONCLUSION: The preemptive bupivacaine or in combination with methylprednisolone caudal injection is an effective and safe method to reduce post-operative pain and ameliorate functional capacity for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

OBJETIVO: En esta investigación prospectiva aleatorizada, nuestro objetivo fue aliviar el dolor quirúrgico y muscular temprano después de las operaciones de disco lumbar con analgesia preventiva caudal. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: en este estudio se incluyeron un total de 120 pacientes con hernia de disco lumbar de un solo nivel. La inyección epidural caudal se realizó para todos los pacientes 20 minutos antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron divididos en tres grupos. Se registró el uso de AINE o tramadol. El dolor preoperatorio y postoperatorio se interpretó a través de una escala analógica visual. RESULTADOS: Hubo diferencia entre los grupos en todas las medidas postoperatorias (p < 0.05), entre el grupo 1 y el grupo 3, y entre el grupo 2 y el grupo 3. Se ha logrado una significación estadística entre los grupos a la 1a hora, 2a hora, 4 y 24 horas (p < 0.05). La diferencia entre las intensidades de dolor de los pacientes a la hora 24 y la primera semana fue estadísticamente significativa en los Grupos 1 y 2 (p < 0.05). La evaluación de los efectos de los tratamientos médicos redujo la gravedad del dolor de espalda y de pie. CONCLUSIÓN: La bupivacaína preventiva, o en combinación con la inyección caudal de metilprednisolona, es un método eficaz y seguro para reducir el dolor posoperatorio y mejorar la capacidad funcional para el tratamiento de la hernia de disco lumbar.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To create three-dimensional anatomical models of the thoracic and lumbar portions of the canine spine that reproduce the vertebral surgical approaches of dorsal laminectomy and hemilaminectomy, and to perform the respective radiographic evaluations of each approach. METHODS: In a digital archive of the canine spine, digitally replicate the dorsal laminectomy and hemilaminectomy in the thoracic and lumbar portions and, then, make tridimensional prints of the vertebral models and obtain radiographs in three dorsoventral, ventrodorsal and laterolateral projections. RESULTS: The anatomical models of the surgical spinal canal accesses of the thoracic and lumbar portions showed great fidelity to the natural bones. The created accesses have the proper shape, location and size, and their radiographic images showed similar radiodensities. CONCLUSIONS: The replicas of the dorsal laminectomy and hemilaminectomy developed in the anatomical models in the thoracic and lumbar portions are able to represent the technical recommendations of the specialized literature, as well as their respective radiographic images, which have certain radiological properties that allow to make a deep radiological study. Therefore, the models are useful for neurosurgical training.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of discontinuity in care by changing surgeons, health systems, or increased time to revision surgery on revision spine fusion surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Patients undergoing revision spine fusion experience worse outcomes than those undergoing primary lumbar surgery. Those requiring complex revisions are often transferred to tertiary or quaternary referral centers under the assumption that those institutions may be more accustomed at performing those procedures. However, there remains a paucity of literature assessing the impact of discontinuity of care in revision spinal fusions. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision 1-3 level lumbar spine fusion 2011-2021 were grouped based on (1) revision performed by the index surgeon versus a different surgeon, (2) revision performed within the same versus different hospital system as the index procedure, and (3) length of time from index procedure. Multivariate regression for outcomes controlled for confounding differences. RESULTS: A total of 776 revision surgeries were included. An increased time interval between the index procedure and the revision surgery was predictive of a lower risk for subsequent revision procedure (odds ratio: 0.57, P =0.022). Revision surgeries performed by the same surgeon predicted a reduced length of hospital stay (ß: -0.14, P =0.001). Neither time to revision nor undergoing by the same surgeon or same practice predicted 90-day readmission rates. Patients are less likely to report meaningful improvement in Mental Component Score-12 or Physical Component Score-12 if revision surgery was performed at a different hospital system. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have revision lumbar fusions have similar clinical outcomes regardless of whether their surgeon performed the index procedure. However, continuity of care with the same surgeon may reduce hospital length of stay and associated health care costs. The length of time between primary and revision surgery does not significantly impact patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various full-endoscopic techniques have been developed to reach the lateral recess of the lumbar spine. However, specialized surgical tools, including expensive spinal endoscopic systems, and a steeper learning curve to mastering the technique are required. METHOD: We present a novel target-addressed unilateral biportal endoscopic technique to reach directly the lumbar lateral recess, particularly useful at L4-L5 and L5-S1. The technique follows an inclined-ipsilateral trajectory to preserve the lateral extension of ligamentum flavum and the facet joint as much as possible. CONCLUSION: This technique was associated with all the advantages of minimally invasive decompressive procedures and outstanding outcomes.

Asunto(s)