RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Technical graft loss, usually thrombotic in nature, accounts for most of the pancreas grafts that are removed early after transplant. Although arterial and venous thrombosis can occur, the vein is predominantly affected, with estimated overall rate of thrombosis of 6% to 33%. In late diagnosis, the graft will need to be removed because thrombectomy will not restore its functionality. However, in early diagnosis, a salvage procedure should be attempted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive analysis of a prospective database of patients who underwent pancreas transplant from April 2008 to June 2020 at a single center. We evaluated post-transplant clinical glucose levels, imaging, treatment, and outcomes. We also performed a systematic review of publications for endovascular treatment of vascular graft thrombosis in pancreas transplant. RESULTS: In 67 pancreas transplants analyzed, 13 (19%) were diagnosed with venous thrombus. In 7 of 13 patients (54%), systemic anticoagulation was prescribed because of a non-occlusive thromboses, resulting in complete resolution for all 7 patients. Six patients (46%) required endovascular thrombectomy because of the presence of complete occlusive thrombosis; 4 of these patients (67%) needed a second procedure because of recurrence of the thrombosis. One of the 6 patients (17%) required a surgical approach, resulting in successful removal of the recurrent clot. Twelve of the 13 grafts (92%) were rescued. Graft survival at 1 year was 84%; graft survival at 3, 5, and 10 years remained at 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas vein thrombosis represents a frequent surgical complication and remains as a challenging problem. In our experience, early diagnoses and an endovascular approach combined with aggressive medical treatment and follow-up can be used for successful treatment and reduce graft loss.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Trasplante de Páncreas , Terapia Recuperativa , Vena Esplénica , Trombectomía , Trombosis de la Vena , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Recuperativa/efectos adversos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Vena Esplénica/cirugía , Vena Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common and potentially fatal condition. Despite existing treatments, recurrence rates and complications remain high. Understanding the pathophysiology of thrombus formation is crucial for developing effective therapies. This narrative review provides an overview of the critical elements of acute and chronic DVT, presents a theoretical framework for understanding thrombus formation, and discusses potential implications for therapeutic interventions. In addition, a hypothesis of thrombus formation is formulated, encompassing all elements described in this work.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar , Trombosis , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Aging is one of the main risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Changes in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies for this condition in recent years require an analysis of its rates in health services. The objective of this study was to analyze a temporal trend of hospitalizations for VTE in Brazilian older adults. This ecological time series study used data from the Hospital Information System (HIS) on VTE hospitalizations from 2010 to 2020, selecting admissions with the main diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) (I.26.0, I.26.9) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (I.80.0, I80.1, I80.2, I80.3, I80.8, I80.9). Hospitalization rates were calculated for each year and the Prais-Winsten. In Brazil, the trend of hospitalizations for VTE decreased, with an annual percentage change of - 40.71 (confidence interval [CI] - 50.46; - 29.04). DVT decreased, with an annual percentage change of - 43.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 51.36; - 33.54). All Brazilian regions showed a downward trend in hospitalizations for VTE and DVT, except for the Northeast region, which remained stable. Conversely, the trend of hospitalizations for PTE showed an upward in Brazil, with an annual percentage change of 4.33 (95% CI 1.26; 7.48). An upward trend was observed in hospitalizations for PTE in the Northeast region, and a stationary trend was observed in the other regions. The results showed a downward trend in hospitalization rates for DVT and an upward trend for PTE. The study indicates regional differences in rates and trends.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Anciano , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Brasil/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report two cases of symptomatic extrinsic compression of the inferior vena cava and left iliac vein caused by vertebral osteophytes. METHODS: We present two case reports of extrinsic venous compression by vertebral osteophytes. Both cases were endovascularly treated, with a successful outcome. A review of the literature of this unusual condition is also presented. RESULTS: The first patient is an 80-year-old woman who presented to the vascular surgery clinic with bilateral lower extremity edema and pain. A computed-tomography angiography (CTA) revealed extrinsic compression of the inferior vena cava from enlarged osteophytes. Venography and intravascular ultrasound were performed, confirming the diagnosis. A self-expanding venous stent was successfully deployed in the inferior vena cava relieving the extrinsic compression. The edema resolved the following day and was discharged without complications. The second patient is a 61-year-old male that presented to the emergency department with a left iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. CTA showed left iliac vein compression by a lumbar osteophyte. Percutaneous thrombectomy was successfully achieved and an expanding stent was deployed covering the entire lesion. One month after the procedure the patient died from COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: Osteophytes must be considered when dealing with extrinsic venous compression, especially in elderly people.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Osteofito , Enfermedades Vasculares , Trombosis de la Vena , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Vena Ilíaca , Vena Cava Inferior , StentsRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Venous stenting for acute and chronic venous disease has been increasingly used as more evidence has accumulated on the efficacy and durability of these interventions for symptomatic patients. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters that could have been present for years will often be implicated in the obstructive pathology and removal can be challenging. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether stenting across an indwelling IVC filter is a safe and effective alternative to removal. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone iliocaval stenting at our institution from 2007 to 2020 were identified and divided into groups stratified by the presence of an IVC filter. The operative notes, venography findings, and the electronic health records were queried to obtain the operative details, patient characteristics, postoperative outcomes, stent patency, and survival outcomes. The primary end point was iliocaval stent patency. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an IVC filter with or without overstenting. We used the χ2 test and survival analysis as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 224 consecutive patients were identified, of whom 71 were found to have undergone iliocaval stenting (age, 48 ± 18 years; 47.9% male; body mass index, 31 ± 9 kg/m2). Of the 71 patients, 15 had had stents placed across an indwelling IVC filter (overstented group) and 56 had not had an IVC filter present (non-overstented group). No differences were found in presentation between the overstented group (acute occlusion, 4 of 15 [26.7%]; chronic occlusion, 8 of 15 [53.3%]; and nonocclusive lesions, 3 of 15 [20%]) and the non-overstented group (acute occlusion, 29 of 56 [52%]; chronic occlusion, 18 of 56 [32%]; nonocclusive lesions, 9 of 56 [16%]; P = .2). Comparisons between the two groups revealed no differences in the baseline characteristics except for age (overstented, 57 ± 15 years; non-overstented, 46 ± 18 years; P = 0.03), preoperative anticoagulation therapy (overstented, 66.6%; non-overstented, 26.9%; P = .01), and bilateral leg symptoms (overstented, 86.7%; non-overstented, 23.2%; P < .001). Primary patency at 30 months was 85.6% in the overstented group and 86.1% in the non-overstented group (P = .78). At follow-up, no adverse events related to filter crushing were reported, and no differences were found in 30-month survival. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center, retrospective study of iliocaval stenting, patients who had undergone overstenting across an indwelling IVC filter had had patency rates similar to those whose stents had been placed with no IVC filter in place. Thus, complex IVC filter removal, when not possible or when the risk of operative complications is too high, can be forgone in favor of stenting across the IVC filter, with no implications on midterm patency or adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Filtros de Vena Cava , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vena Cava Inferior , Stents/efectos adversos , Vena Ilíaca , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) consists of partial or complete occlusion of a sinus or a cerebral vein. CVT represents 0.5-1% of all strokes and is more frequent in young women. This review discusses particular aspects of CVT diagnosis and management: decompressive craniectomy (DC), anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), CVT after coronavirus-disease 19 (COVID-19) and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Venas Cerebrales , Trombosis Intracraneal , Trombosis de la Vena , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Trombosis Intracraneal/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate liver function improvement and volume gain after percutaneous recanalization of chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in non-cirrhotic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, five non-cirrhotic participants between 21 and 67 years old with secondary chronic PVT (4-21 years from diagnose) were submitted to percutaneous portal vein recanalization, followed by varices and shunts embolization. RESULTS: After a mean of 12.6 months, all portal veins remained patent and there was complete resolution of portal hypertension (PH) symptoms in all participants. There was a significant increase in liver volume of 39.8 ± 19.0% (p = 0.042), platelets count of 53120 ± 20188/µl (p = 0.042), and a significant decrease in total bilirubin levels from 1.04 ± 0.23 mg/dL to 0.51 ± 0.09 mg/dL (p = 0.043). We also found a non-significant increase in albumin levels from 3.88 ± 0.39 g/dL to 4.38 ± 0.27 g/dL (p = 0.078) and decrease in spleen diameter from 16.88 ± 4.03 cm to 14.15 ± 2.72 cm (p = 0.068). DISCUSSION: In this retrospective study, even with a small number of participants, we were capable of showing a median of 39.8% increase in liver volume, laboratorial liver function improvement, platelets count and resolution of PH symptoms, including gastroesophageal varices disappearance after portal vein recanalization followed by shunt embolization. CONCLUSION: In this small series of cases, recanalization of chronic PVT in non-cirrhotic participants was feasible, successful and safe despite the prolonged time of occlusion. This is a new and promising approaching to an old and still challenging disease.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía/métodos , Hipertensión Portal , Hígado/fisiología , Vena Porta/fisiología , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Hipertensión Portal/patología , Hígado/crecimiento & desarrollo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 627 HCC patients with PVTT after initial treatment with one of the following at Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University: liver resection (LR, n = 225), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 298) or sorafenib (n = 104) were recruited and randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 314) and internal validation cohort (n = 313). Survival analysis were repeated after stratifying patients by Cheng PVTT type. RESULTS: Resection led to significantly higher OS than the other two treatments among patients with type I or II PVTT. TACE worked significantly better than the other two treatments for patients with type III. All three treatments were associated with similar OS among patients with type IV. These findings were supported by the internal validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the optimal treatment for HCC involving PVTT depends on the type of PVTT. LR may be more appropriate for type I or II PVTT; TACE, for type III Sorafenib may be more appropriate than invasive treatments for patients with type IV PVTT.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Vena Porta , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Iliac venous stenting (IVS) for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disease is increasingly used as evidence of the safety, efficacy and durability of these interventions increases. Female gender has been implicated as a predictor of failure in arterial endovascular interventions. We hypothesize that female gender could be predictive of patency rates of iliac vein stenting. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent IVS for thrombotic or nonthrombotic venous disease at our institution from 2007 until 2019 were identified and divided into groups based on gender. Operative notes, venograms, and the electronic health record were then queried to obtain operative details, co-morbid conditions, postoperative outcomes and stent patency. Study outcome was long term patency rate. The data was analyzed using chi-square, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients (231 limbs) were identified in our retrospective analysis, with a mean age of 48.8 ± 17.3, and BMI of 31.6 ± 8.6. Of those, 119 (59.5%) patients, (131 [56.8%] limbs) were female. Comparisons between the gender groups revealed no difference in age, BMI, or preoperative comorbidities. There was no difference in type of venous disease between male (85% thrombotic, 15% nonthrombotic) and female (84% thrombotic, 16% nonthrombotic), P= 0.830. The male cohort was more likely to present with leg ulceration (17% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.002), and the female cohort was more likely to present with leg edema (98.5% vs. 93.0%, P= 0.03). The male cohort had a higher rate of caval (48% vs. 33.6%, P= 0.027) and infrainguinal stent extension. (11% vs. 6.9%, P= 0.02). Females had a higher rate of left sided stenting (80.9% vs. 66/0%, P= 0.010). There was no difference in the median stent diameter used between the cohorts. Primary patency at 5 years was significantly higher for the male cohort (94.1% vs. 74.4%, P= 0.01) On adjusted multivariable cox regression female gender was a predictor of loss of primary patency within 5 years (HR, 4.04; P= 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center retrospective analysis of IVS, male patients were found to have better primary stent patency compared to female.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Vena Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism have been described as complications in previously diagnosed COVID-19 patients, especially in those admitted in critical ill units, but, to our knowledge, there is no report of venous thromboembolism in an otherwise asymptomatic COVID-19 patient. METHODS: We report the case of a 22-year-old female, healthy patient with pulmonary embolism (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Score 22 points, low risk) and extensive proximal deep vein thrombosis as a unique clinical manifestation of the new coronavirus disease. RESULTS: The patient had no risk factors and no familial history of venous thromboembolism. All thrombophilia markers were negative. The patient was treated as first by an independent vascular team, performing vena cava filter placement and open thrombectomy. Her symptoms worsened, and after 3 weeks, she underwent US-enhanced thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. She was isolated for 10 days and did not develop any other clinical manifestation of COVID-19 disease. During follow-up, she remained asymptomatic and complete patency of the venous system was achieved. Full oral anticoagulation was conducted for 6 months. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 appears to be a multi-symptomatic disease, and venous thromboembolism without any other previous described COVID-19 symptom could be considered one of its diverse clinical presentations and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 tests emerge to be mandatory in patients with otherwise unexpected venous thrombosis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Filtros de Vena Cava , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Resumen: Introducción: la vacunación contra SARS-CoV-2 es una herramienta imprescindible en el combate contra la pandemia de COVID-19. La vacuna desarrollada en colaboración entre la Universidad de Oxford y el laboratorio de productos farmacéuticos AstraZeneca (AZN) ha demostrado buena eficacia, pero ha habido reporte de trombosis venosas. Caso clínico: se presenta el caso de un paciente de 70 años, de sexo masculino, que 7 días después de la administración de la primera dosis de la vacuna AZN desarrolla trombosis venosa profunda de ambos miembros inferiores y tromboembolismo pulmonar. Coincide con trombocitopenia de 15.000/mm3, descenso del fibrinógeno y elevación de los D-dímeros. La situación clínica evoca el planteo de trombocitopenia trombótica inducida por vacuna (VITT). Se realizó tratamiento con inmunoglobulinas intravenosas, metilprednisolona y crioprecipitados. Requirió colocación de un filtro de la vena cava inferior. Una vez mejorado el recuento plaquetario se instaló tratamiento anticoagulante con apixaban. Evolucionó favorablemente. Discusión: se trata del primer reporte nacional de VITT. Las trombosis subsiguientes a la vacuna de AZN pueden verse con las vacunas que comparten la misma plataforma vacunal (adenovirus inactivado). Se han reportado casos fundamentalmente en menores de 60 años y en topografías inhabituales. Este caso tiene la particularidad de que se trata de un paciente mayor de 60 años, que ya había tenido COVID-19 cinco meses antes y que se presenta con una trombosis en sitios habituales. El manejo terapéutico se adecuó a las pautas internacionales. El caso deja un aprendizaje relevante tanto en lo que refiere al diagnóstico precoz como al manejo terapéutico.
Abstract: Introduction: vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are an essential tool against the COVID-19 pandemic. The vaccine developed in collaboration with the University of Oxford and the AstraZeneca (AZN) laboratory has proved to be effective, although venous thrombosis have been reported. Clinical case: the study presents the case of a 70 year old male patient who, 7 days after receiving the first dose of the AZN vaccination develops deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremities and pulmonary embolism. Simultaneously, thrombocytopenia is 15.000/mm3, fibrinogen levels drop D-dimer levels are elevated. The clinical situation leads to the suspicion of vaccine-associated immune thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT). The patient was treated with intravenous immune globulin, methylprednisolone and cryoprecipitates, requiring a filter to be placed in the inferior vena cava. Once platelets count improved, anti-coagulation therapy including apixaban was commenced, evolution being good. Discussion: this is the first national report on VITT. Thrombosis after the AZN vaccination may be seen in other vaccines that use the same vaccine platform (inactive adenovirus). Cases have been reported mainly in patients younger than 60 years old and in unusual topographies. In particular, this case presents a male patient that is older than 60 years old, who had already been infected with COVID-19 five months before and who currently consults with thrombosis in regular sites. Therapeutic handling observed international guidelines. The case contributes relevant data both in terms of early diagnosis and therapeutic handling.
Resumo: Introdução: a vacinação contra a SARS-CoV-2 é uma ferramenta essencial na luta contra a pandemia de COVID-19. A vacina desenvolvida pela colaboração entre a Universidade de Oxford e o laboratório farmacêutico AstraZeneca (AZN) tem demonstrado boa eficácia, mas foram relatados casos de trombose venosa. Caso clínico: apresenta-se o caso de um paciente do sexo masculino, 70 anos, que 7 dias após a administração da primeira dose da vacina AZN desenvolveu trombose venosa profunda de ambos os membros inferiores e tromboembolismo pulmonar. Coincide com trombocitopenia de 15.000 / mm3, diminuição do fibrinogênio e aumento dos D-dímeros. A situação clínica lembra a trombocitopenia trombótica induzida por vacina (VITT). O tratamento foi realizado com imunoglobulinas intravenosas, metilprednisolona e crioprecipitados. Foi necessário colocar um filtro de veia cava inferior. Uma vez que a contagem de plaquetas melhorou, o tratamento anticoagulante com apixaban foi instalado. O paciente favoravelmente. Discussão: este é o primeiro relatório nacional de VITT. As tromboses subseqüentes à vacina AZN podem ser vistas com vacinas que compartilham a mesma plataforma (adenovírus inativado). Os casos foram relatados principalmente em pessoas com menos de 60 anos de idade e em topografias incomuns. Este caso tem a particularidade de se tratar de um paciente com mais de 60 anos, já com COVID-19 há cinco meses e que apresenta trombose em sítios comuns. O manejo terapêutico foi adaptado às diretrizes internacionais. O caso deixa um aprendizado relevante tanto no que diz respeito ao diagnóstico precoce quanto ao manejo terapêutico.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: May-Thurner syndrome has been recognized as a cause of chronic venous insufficiency and a trigger for venous thromboembolism. There is no consensus about the definition, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach. We are aiming to describe its characteristics and a scoping literature review. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with May-Thurner syndrome from March 2010 to May 2018 and scoping literature review were made. RESULTS: Seven patients were identified. All patients were female with a median age of 36 (20-60) years. The median time from the first symptom to diagnosis was 3.41 (0.01-9) years. The primary clinical presentation was post-thrombotic syndrome (4 patients). Six patients had at least one risk factor for deep venous thrombosis. All patients underwent angioplasty with stent; patients with acute deep venous thrombosis, furthermore mechanic thrombectomy with or without catheter-directed thrombolysis were done. There were three complications (one patient, lymphedema, and two venous stent thrombosis). Scoping review results were descriptively summarized. CONCLUSION: May-Thurner syndrome has a varied spectrum of clinical presentation, and clinical awareness is paramount for diagnosis. Its principal complication is the post-thrombotic syndrome, which is associated with high morbidity. There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment approach.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Síndrome de May-Thurner/terapia , Síndrome Postrombótico/terapia , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Angioplastia/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome de May-Thurner/complicaciones , Síndrome de May-Thurner/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Postrombótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Catatonic patients may develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) due to prolonged periods of immobility. These life-threatening conditions demand prompt recognition and management. We describe the case of a patient with catatonia who presented to anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) at the outset of the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. She complained of breathing difficulty and was suspected to have COVID-19 infection. On further evaluation, she was found to have DVT and PE and required oxygen therapy and intensive care management. The diagnostic delay in our patient would have probably not occurred, had it not been for the existing pandemic situation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Catatonia/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Tardío , Terapia Electroconvulsiva , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Anestesia , Catatonia/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/uso terapéutico , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Outflow venous stenting as an adjunct to catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is performed to prevent recurrent thrombosis and to reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. Historical data show that stenting improves outcomes of surgical thrombectomy in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and recent observational data suggest that stenting improves long-term outcomes of CDT. However, the impact of stenting during CDT on acute safety outcomes is unknown. We sought to investigate the contemporary trends, safety outcomes, and resource utilization of adjunctive stent placement in patients undergoing CDT. METHODS: Patients with proximal lower extremity and caval DVT were identified within the National Inpatient Sample from January 2005 to December 2013. From this data set, we stratified our patients into three groups: patients who received CDT alone, patients who received CDT plus angioplasty, and patients who received CDT plus angioplasty with stenting. We used an inverse probability treatment weighting algorithm to create three weighted cohorts. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate the trends of stent placement among patients treated with CDT. The primary outcome was a composite end point of all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleed, or intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 138,049 patients were discharged with a principal diagnosis of proximal and caval DVT; 7097 of these patients received CDT (5.1%). From this group, 2854 (40.2%) were treated with CDT alone, 2311 (32.6%) received adjunctive angioplasty alone, and 1932 (27.2%) received adjunctive angioplasty and stent. Adjunctive stenting had a significantly lower rate of primary composite outcome compared with CDT alone (2.7% vs 3.8%; P = .04). Stent placement was associated with a similar length of stay compared with angioplasty and CDT alone groups (6.8 vs 6.9 vs 7.1 days, respectively; P = .94) and higher in-hospital charges ($115,164.01 ± $76,985.31 vs $98,089.82 ± $72,921.94 vs $80,441.63 ± $74,024.98; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study suggests that one in four patients undergoing CDT is treated with adjunctive stent placement in the United States. This observational study showed that adjunctive stenting does not adversely affect the acute safety outcomes of CDT; however, it was associated with increased hospital charges.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents/tendencias , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/mortalidadRESUMEN
La trombosis de la vena porta (TVP) se define como una oclusión parcial o completa de la luz de la vena porta o sus afluentes por la formación de trombos. La etiología de la formación de TVP en un hígado cirrótico parece ser multifactorial, y presenta una prevalencia de 1,3% a 9,8%. La fisiopatología de la TVP en pacientes con cirrosis aún no se comprende completamente, pero se sabe que existe una disminución de la síntesis tanto de factores procoagulantes como de anticoagulantes, que asociados a factores de riesgo locales o sistémicos, favorecen el predominio de los procoagulantes que causan la trombosis. Establecer el momento de la instauración de la trombosis y el nivel anatómico dentro del sistema venoso espleno-mesentérico, son aspectos fundamentales para estimar el pronóstico y ayudar a la toma de decisiones terapéuticas. A pesar de que hasta la fecha no se ha publicado un consenso sobre su profilaxis o tratamiento en la cirrosis hepática, y existen muchas controversias con respecto al manejo óptimo de la TVP, se han observado beneficios generales de la anticoagulación con heparina de bajo peso molecular en pacientes con cirrosis hepática, en particular en aquellos con TVP aguda. El objetivo de esta revisión es explorar los temas más relevantes al momento de abordar un paciente con cirrosis hepática y TVP.
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is defined as a partial or complete occlusion of the lumen of the portal vein or its tributaries due to the formation of thrombi. The etiology of DVT formation in a cirrhotic liver appears to be multifactorial, with a prevalence of 1.3% to 9.8%. The pathophysiology of PVT in patients with cirrhosis is not yet fully understood, but it is known that there is a decrease in the synthesis of both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, which associated with local or systemic risk factors, favor the predominance of procoagulants that cause thrombosis. Establishing the onset of thrombosis and the anatomical level within the splanchnic mesenteric venous system are fundamental aspects to estimate the prognosis and aid in therapeutic decision-making. Despite the fact that to date no consensus has been published on its prophylaxis or treatment in liver cirrhosis, and the many controversies regarding the optimal management of PVT, general benefits of anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin have been observed in patients with liver cirrhosis, particularly those with acute PVT. The objective of this review is to explore the most relevant issues when approaching a patient with liver cirrhosis and PVT.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Vena Porta , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Trombosis de la Vena/clasificación , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Abstract The incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) exceeds 70% in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), even in cases of distal deep vein thrombosis. We report the case of a patient with a diagnosis of DVT in the lower left limb associated with asymptomatic PE who presented late symptoms due to this same PE. The absence of acute symptoms and the late onset of symptoms could have provoked doubts about the most appropriate treatment, resulting in unnecessary interventions, if pulmonary embolism had not already been diagnosed with tomography. In the present case, we demonstrate that computed tomography angiography conducted at the time of DVT diagnosis accurately diagnosed PE and prevented any misinterpretation of recurrent DVT in a patient already being medicated, which could have been mistakenly interpreted as demonstrating failure of anticoagulant therapy. Such a situation could lead to unnecessary intervention to fit an inferior vena cava filter. We cannot suggest that a classic medical conduct should be reformulated simply on the basis of a case report. However, we would be remiss not to suggest that well-designed studies should be carried out in the future to assess the need for this examination in the acute phase.
Resumo A ocorrência de embolia pulmonar assintomática em pacientes com trombose venosa profunda tem uma incidência que excede 70%, mesmo nos casos de trombose venosa profunda distal. Relatamos o caso de um paciente com diagnóstico de trombose venosa profunda no membro inferior esquerdo associado a embolia pulmonar assintomática, que apresentou sintomas tardios devido a essa mesma embolia. A ausência de sintomas agudos e o surgimento de sintomas tardios pode suscitar dúvidas quanto ao tratamento mais adequado e resultar em intervenções desnecessárias, se o diagnóstico tomográfico de embolia pulmonar não tiver sido feito anteriormente. No presente caso, demonstramos que uma angiotomografia realizada no momento do diagnóstico de trombose venosa profunda detectou a embolia pulmonar e evitou uma interpretação incorreta de um evento trombótico recorrente na vigência de anticoagulação, o que por engano demonstraria uma falha na terapia anticoagulante. Essa situação pode levar a intervenções desnecessárias, como o implante de filtro de veia cava inferior. Entendemos que apenas um relato de caso não deve mudar uma conduta médica já estabelecida; no entanto, fomenta a discussão e estimula estudos que avaliem a necessidade de um exame diagnóstico pulmonar no momento do diagnóstico de trombose venosa profunda.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Recurrencia , Vena Cava Inferior , Tamizaje Masivo , Filtros de Vena Cava , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Extremidad Inferior , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension commonly accompanies advanced liver disease and often gives rise to life-threatening complications, including haemorrhage from oesophageal and gastrointestinal varices. Variceal haemorrhage commonly occurs in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein obstruction. Prevention is therefore important. In adults, numerous randomised clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of non-selective beta-blockers and endoscopic variceal ligation as primary prevention in decreasing the risk of variceal haemorrhage. In children, band ligation, beta-blockers, and sclerotherapy have been proposed as alternatives for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding. However, primary prophylaxis is not the current standard of care in children because it is unknown whether those treatments are of benefit or cause harm when used for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and adolescents with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Science Citation Index Expanded (27 April 2020). We scrutinised the reference lists of retrieved publications, and performed a manual search from the main paediatric gastroenterology and hepatology conferences (NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN) abstract books from 2008 to 2019. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, EMA, and WHO for ongoing clinical trials. There were no language or document type restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised clinical trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status for assessment of benefits and harms. If the search for randomised clinical trials retrieved quasi-randomised and observational studies, then we read them through to extract information on harms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned to summarise data from randomised clinical trials by standard Cochrane methodologies. We planned to assess risk of bias and use GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence per outcome. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and liver-related morbidity, and quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were oesophageal variceal bleeding and adverse events not considered serious. We planned to analyse data with intention-to-treat. We planned to use Review Manager 5 to analyse the data. MAIN RESULTS: We found no randomised clinical trials assessing band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Randomised clinical trials assessing the benefits or harms of band ligation versus sclerotherapy for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis are lacking. Therefore, trials with adequate power and proper design, assessing the benefits and harms of band ligation versus sclerotherapy on patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as mortality, quality of life, failure to control variceal bleeding, and adverse events are needed. Unless such trials are conducted and the results become published, we cannot make any conclusions regarding the benefits or harms of these two interventions.
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Ligadura/métodos , Hepatopatías/complicaciones , Vena Porta , Escleroterapia , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Prevención Primaria/métodosRESUMEN
A 12-year-old girl with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection presented as phlegmasia cerulea dolens with venous gangrene. Emergent mechanical thrombectomy was complicated by a massive pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest, for which extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and therapeutic hypothermia were used. Staged ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis was used for treatment of bilateral pulmonary emboli and the extensive lower extremity deep vein thrombosis while the patient received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. We highlight the need for heightened suspicion for occult severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among children presenting with unusual thrombotic complications.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/virología , Tromboflebitis/virología , Venas/patología , Trombosis de la Vena/virología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/terapia , Niño , Femenino , Gangrena/diagnóstico , Gangrena/virología , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/patología , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Tromboflebitis/diagnóstico , Tromboflebitis/patología , Tromboflebitis/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/patología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is a poorly understood clinical entity, and as such, outcomes are poorly described. This study aimed to identify predictors of bowel ischemia after MVT and to compare outcomes for patients treated medically (group 1) with those for patients treated with bowel resection (group 2). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institution study capturing all patients diagnosed with symptomatic acute MVT on computed tomography imaging from 2008 to 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, imaging, laboratory values, and treatment were included. Predictors of bowel resection were analyzed by univariate and multivariate statistics. Outcomes including mortality, readmissions for abdominal pain, and chronic mesenteric venous congestion were compared using χ2 test. RESULTS: There were 121 patients included in the study; 98 patients were treated medically (group 1), 19 patients were treated with bowel resection (group 2), and 4 patients were treated with endovascular recanalization (group 3). Group 1 and group 2 were compared directly. Patients requiring bowel resection tended to have higher body mass index (P = .051) and a hypercoagulable disorder (P = .003). Patients who required bowel resection were more likely to present with lactic acidosis (P < .001) and leukocytosis (P < .001) with bowel wall thickening on scan (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, a genetic thrombophilia was a strong predictor of bowel ischemia (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-12.37). One-year mortality and readmission rates did not differ between groups. However, readmission rates for abdominal pain were high for both groups (group 1, 44.90%; group 2, 57.89%; P = .317), and a significant proportion of patients exhibited chronic mesenteric venous congestion on repeated scan (group 1, 42.86%; group 2, 47.37%; P = .104). CONCLUSIONS: A genetic hypercoagulable disorder is a predictor of bowel ischemia due to MVT. Regardless of treatment, outcomes after MVT are morbid, with high rates of readmission for abdominal pain. An alternative approach to treat these patients is needed, given the poor outcomes with current strategies.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Venas Mesentéricas/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidad , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidad , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Venas Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Mesentéricas/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Circulación Esplácnica , Trombofilia/genética , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/mortalidad , Trombosis de la Vena/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of stents for treating central venous occlusion is well described. Limited evidence exists related to Palmaz balloon-expandable stent use in inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction. We analyzed patency and complication rates after IVC reconstruction using Palmaz stents. METHODS: From 2002 to 2019, 37 patients (mean age: 51 year) underwent IVC reconstruction with 68 Palmaz stents. Indications were symptomatic chronic venous obstruction in the infrarenal (n = 25) and intrahepatic (n = 12) IVC. Demographic, operative, and imaging data were evaluated. Clinical data, abdominal CT, and/or duplex ultrasound were used to determine patency at follow-up. RESULTS: Restoration of caval patency was achieved in all patients, with complications in 2/37 (5.4%) patients (thrombus formation within the stent; stent embolization eight days after placement). Follow-up data were available for 27 patients. Primary patency was maintained through last follow-up in 19/27 (70%) patients (mean: 1.1 year), with successful stent redilation performed in 6 patients. Mean duration of primary-assisted patency (n = 5) was 1.2 year. Late lumen loss was (n = 13) was 40% during a mean time to follow-up of 2.0 years. Primary patency in patients with occlusion secondary to malignancy was 109 day (range: 1 day-1.0 year), whereas primary patency in patients with occlusion from other etiologies was 1.1 year (range: 2 day-5.9 year). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated primary and primary-assisted patency of 66% and 84%, respectively, at 24 and 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: Palmaz balloon-expandable stents for IVC reconstruction is feasible and effective for symptomatic IVC occlusion. Risk of stent migration was low.