Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 579
Filtrar
1.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 41(4): 759-773, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237183

RESUMEN

The gold standard diagnostic imaging tool for ankle OCLs is magnetic resonance imaging, which allows precise evaluation of the articular cartilage and assessment of the surrounding soft tissue structures. Post-operative morphologic MRI assessment via MOCART scores provide semi-quantitative analysis of the repair tissue, but mixed evidence exists regarding its association with post-operative outcomes. Post-operative biochemical MRIs allow assessment of the collagen network of the articular cartilage via T2-mapping and T2∗ mapping, and assessment of the articular glycosaminoglycan content via delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1rho mapping and sodium imaging.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Osteocondritis/cirugía , Osteocondritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 41(4): 853-864, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237188

RESUMEN

High-resolution ultrasound (US) can be used to assess soft tissue abnormalities in the foot and ankle. Compared to MRI, it has lower cost, is widely available, allows portability and dynamic assessment. US is an excellent method to evaluate foot and ankle tendon injuries, ligament tears, plantar fascia, peripheral nerves, and the different causes of metatarsalgia.


Asunto(s)
Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Tendones/diagnóstico por imagen , Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
BMC Res Notes ; 17(1): 238, 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39215333

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare the findings of plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) of foot and ankle in patients submitted to the emergency department with high-energy foot and ankle trauma, to demonstrate if missing fractures on plain radiographs will significantly alter the treatment plan considered for each patient based on the findings of each imaging modality. We retrospectively observed standard radiological foot and ankle x-rays and CT scans in patients who presented to our center from April 2019 to June 2020 with a history of foot and ankle trauma with either loss of consciousness, a history of high-energy trauma, or clinical presentation disproportionate to plain radiographic findings. We investigated the number of fractures of each bone detected on plain radiographs and CT scans and the treatments based on each modality's findings in patients admitted to our center. Sixty-five out of 163 (39.87%) included in our study had at least one missed fracture on plain radiography that was detected on CT. Thirty-one (19%) patients had normal radiography despite actually having fractures. In 38 (23.31%) patients CT changed the treatment plan decided by our surgeons (P < 0.001). The two imaging modalities had a moderate agreement for detecting foot and ankle fractures overall (κ = 0.432). The failure to detect fractures in patients with high-energy trauma can significantly impact treatment effectiveness. Integrating CT scans into the diagnostic process can lead to changes in treatment planning and ultimately improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: IV.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo , Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos del Tobillo/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Radiografía/métodos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pie/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb) ; 127(9): 665-676, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39079994

RESUMEN

Lisfranc injuries are rare but severe injuries of the foot. They range from ligament sprain to complex fracture dislocations. Etiologically, a distinction is made between indirect and direct force and between high-energy and low-energy trauma. Inadequate diagnostics (injuries overlooked or misinterpreted) can lead to painful posttraumatic osteoarthritis, chronic instability and deformity of the foot. A fracture, malalignment and unclear findings in conventional radiological diagnostics necessitate computed tomography imaging including 3D reconstruction. Lisfranc injuries are often associated with accompanying pathologies of the foot that also need to be addressed. Only stable non-displaced fractures can be treated conservatively. Depending on the injury pattern, surgical treatment is performed percutaneously, minimally invasive or open. The prognosis following Lisfranc injury is determined by the severity of damage and the quality of reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Humanos , Traumatismos de los Pies/terapia , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Ligamentos Articulares/lesiones , Ligamentos Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico
5.
Oper Orthop Traumatol ; 36(3-4): 211-222, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39073454

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive stabilization of metatarsal fractures to enable adequate fracture healing in a correct position to restore anatomy and biomechanics of the foot. INDICATIONS: A. Dislocated diaphyseal and subcapital fractures of the second to fifth metatarsal (> 3 mm, > 10° dislocation). B. Fifth metatarsal fracture at the metadiaphyseal junction (Lawrence and Botte type III). CONTRAINDICATIONS: High grade soft tissue damage or infection at the implant insertion site. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: A. Fluoroscopically assisted closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal and subcapital fractures of the second to fifth metatarsal. B. Fluoroscopically assisted wire-guided intramedullary screw fixation of fifth metatarsal fractures at the metadiaphyseal junction. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: A. Mobilization with partial weight bearing (20 kg) for 6 weeks wearing a stiff sole; implant removal under local anesthesia after 6-8 weeks, followed by a free range of movement and weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT). B. Early mobilization with weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT); removal of the orthosis after 6 weeks, implant removal optional. RESULTS: A. Antegrade nailing of subcapital and shaft fractures of metatarsals II-V achieves good clinical results with low complication rates both when using prepared Kirschner wires or elastically stable intramedullary nails (ESIN). B. According to current literature, intramedullary screw osteosynthesis of proximal metatarsal V fractures of zone II and III according to Lawrence and Botte leads to faster bony healing with a lower nonunion rate compared with conservative treatment. It is recommended especially, but not only, for active athletes.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas , Huesos Metatarsianos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Humanos , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Femenino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Tornillos Óseos , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Hilos Ortopédicos
6.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 41(3): 425-435, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789162

RESUMEN

Navicular and cuboid fractures can be complex and difficult to treat. Depending on the mechanism of injury, diagnosis of such fractures is not always possible with conventional radiographs due to the irregularity and overlap of the midfoot bones. Advanced imaging is indicated if a fracture is of high suspicion or to further characterize a displaced fracture. Cuboid and navicular fractures can occur in isolation but are often associated with other midfoot injuries due to their anatomic relationships. Typically, nondisplaced fractures can be treated conservatively, whereas displaced fractures require surgical intervention to prevent future complications.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Huesos Tarsianos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/terapia , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Radiografía , Huesos Tarsianos/lesiones , Huesos Tarsianos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
7.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 41(3): 407-423, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789161

RESUMEN

Lisfranc injuries were thought to primarily occur during high-energy events, leading to a preference for fusion treatment; however, recent data have shifted this perspective by highlighting a greater occurrence of low-energy injuries and reshaping the focus on open reduction internal fixation. This multifaceted process is guided by various factors, including the nature of the injury, specific anatomic considerations, and the involved joints. Our overarching goal remains to achieve anatomic reduction, with flexibility in hardware fixation methods. In cases of comminution, bridge plating may be warranted, potentially followed by arthrodesis in the future.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Masculino , Artrodesis/métodos , Placas Óseas , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/métodos
9.
Emerg Radiol ; 31(3): 341-348, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644451

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the distribution and characteristics of pediatric foot fractures on radiographs with respect to age and skeletal maturation, and to identify predictors of surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included children (≤ 18 years) with foot fractures, who underwent radiographic examinations (2020-2022). Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic and clinical data. Fracture characteristics, including anatomic location, presence of displacement, angulation, articular involvement, and, if skeletally immature, physeal involvement and Salter-Harris fracture pattern were collected. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of surgery. RESULTS: 1,090 (596-boys, 494-girls; mean age, 11.0 ± 4.0 years) patients with 1,325 (59.8% metatarsal, 33.8% phalangeal, and 6.4% tarsal) fractures were included. Fractures of 1st metatarsal were more common among younger children whereas fractures of 2nd-4th and 5th metatarsals were more common among older children (median ages: 5.9 years vs. 10.3 years and 12.4 years, p < 0.001). Intra-articular fractures were more common among maturing and mature than immature bones (25.3% and 20.4% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001). Physeal involvement was uncommon (162/977, 16.6%) and the most common pattern was Salter-Harris type II (133/162, 82.1%). A minority (47/1090, 4.3%) of patients required surgery and independent predictors of surgery included physeal involvement (OR = 5.12, 95% CI: 2.48-10.39, p < 0.001), multiple fractures (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.67-8.53, p = 0.001), fracture displacement (OR = 9.16, 95% CI:4.43-19.07, p < 0.001), and articular involvement (OR = 2.72, 95% CI:1.27-5.72, p = 0.008). Using these predictors, the likelihood for surgery ranged between 8.0% with 1 and 86.7% with 3 predictors. CONCLUSION: Pediatric foot fracture patterns differed based on age and regional skeletal maturation. Physeal involvement, multiple fractures, fracture displacement, and articular involvement were independent predictors of surgery in our study group.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Radiografía , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Adolescente , Preescolar , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Lactante
10.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ; 28(2): 213-217, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484773

RESUMEN

Hyperextension of the first metatarsophalangeal joint can lead to a turf toe injury of the plantar plate complex, resulting in significant morbidity for athletes. This article reviews the anatomy, pathophysiology, classification, and imaging findings of turf toe injuries. In turf toe trauma, many different structures can be injured, with the sesamoid-phalangeal ligaments the most common. Diagnosis, classification, and treatment options rely on clinical evaluation and specific magnetic resonance imaging findings. It is vital for radiologists to understand the anatomy, pathophysiology, and imaging findings of turf toe injuries to ensure an accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Traumatismos de los Pies , Hallux , Articulación Metatarsofalángica , Humanos , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Hallux/diagnóstico por imagen , Hallux/lesiones , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/lesiones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen
11.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(3): 411-413, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346585

RESUMEN

Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint (TMT) results in instability throughout the midfoot that does not often improve with conservative management. If instability is identified, surgical intervention is frequently recommended, either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA). These 2 treatment options have been compared in the literature multiple times, often reporting similar outcomes. Due to this, as well as the need for subsequent hardware removal after ORIF has led many surgeons towards PA at the index surgery. Concern for nonunion is a leading concern with surgeons who advocate instead for ORIF. The purpose of this study is to review patients who underwent PA and observe nonunion rates. Nonunion at the TMT has been previously studied, but only in the chronic setting. We performed a retrospective study of 34 patients who had PA in the management of an acute Lisfranc injury. The average age in our study was 43.9 years old (range 19-72, SD 17.4) with an average follow-up of 9.4 months (range 4-33, SD 6.2). Radiographs were evaluated for signs of nonunion at regular postoperative intervals. Within the patients included in the study, a total of 71 TMT joints were fused. Overall successful fusion rate was 95.8% at an average of 7.9 weeks (range 6-12, SD 1.4) postoperatively. Individual nonunion rates at the first, second, and third TMT were 0%, 1.4% and 2.8% respectively. Our study demonstrates that primary arthrodesis provides a predictable outcome with low nonunion rates in the management of acute Lisfranc injury.


Asunto(s)
Artrodesis , Fracturas no Consolidadas , Humanos , Artrodesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Fracturas no Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Articulaciones Tarsianas/cirugía , Articulaciones Tarsianas/lesiones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Articulaciones del Pie/cirugía , Articulaciones del Pie/lesiones , Articulaciones del Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía
12.
Am Fam Physician ; 109(2): 119-129, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393796

RESUMEN

Foot fractures account for about one-third of lower extremity fractures in adults. They are typically caused by a crush injury or an axial or twisting force on the foot. Patients usually present with bony point tenderness and swelling of the affected area. Weight-bearing varies based on the extent of the fracture and the patient's pain tolerance. When a foot or toe fracture is suspected, anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiography with weight-bearing should be obtained. The Ottawa foot and ankle rules can help determine the need for radiography after an acute ankle inversion injury. Many foot fractures can be managed with a short leg cast or boot or a hard-soled shoe. Weight-bearing and duration of immobilization are based on the stability of the fracture and the patient's pain level. Most toe fractures can be managed nonsurgically with a hard-soled shoe for two to six weeks. Close attention should be paid to the great toe because of its role in weight-bearing, and physicians should follow specific guidelines for orthopedic referral. Meta-tarsal shaft fractures are managed with a boot or hard-soled shoe for three to six weeks. The proximal aspect of the fifth metatarsal has varied rates of healing due to poor blood supply, and management is based on the fracture zone. Lis-franc fractures are often overlooked; radiography with weight-bearing should be obtained, and physicians should look for widening of the tarsometatarsal joint. Other tarsal bone fractures can be managed with a short leg cast or boot for four to six weeks when nonsurgical treatment is indicated. Common foot fracture complications include arthritis, infection, malunion or nonunion, and compartment syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Huesos Metatarsianos , Adulto , Humanos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/terapia , Extremidad Inferior , Dolor
13.
Skeletal Radiol ; 53(2): 345-352, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490103

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and time in the detection of fractures on pediatric foot radiographs marked without and with localization cues. METHOD: One-hundred randomly selected foot radiographic examinations that were performed on children (<18 years old) after injury and with at least 4 weeks of follow-up were included. Blinded to history and diagnosis, 4 readers (one each: medical student, pediatrician, pediatric orthopedic surgeon, and pediatric musculoskeletal radiologist) retrospectively and independently reviewed each examination twice (without and with cue, at least 1 month apart, and after randomization). Each reader recorded the presence or absence of a fracture, fracture location, diagnostic confidence, and the total (interpretation) time spent on each study. Diagnostic accuracy, reader confidence, and interpretation time were compared between examinations without and with cues. RESULTS: Our study included 59 examinations without and 41 with fractures (21 phalangeal, 18 metatarsal, and 2 tarsal fractures). Localization cues improved inter-reader agreement (κ=0.36 to 0.64), overall sensitivity (68 to 72%), specificity (66 to 73%), and diagnostic accuracy (67 to 73%); thus, overcalled and missed rates also improved from 34 to 27% and 32 to 28%, respectively. Reader confidence improved with cue (49 to 61%, p<0.01) with higher incremental improvement with younger children (30% for 1-6 years; 14% for 7-11 years; and 10% for 12-17 years). Interpretation time decreased by 40% per examination (40±22 s without to 24±13 s with cues, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Localization cues improved diagnostic accuracy and reader confidence, reducing interpretation time in the detection of pediatric foot fractures.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Señales (Psicología) , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen
14.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(2): 165-170, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839686

RESUMEN

Multimetatarsal fractures are a particular type possibly associated with worse functional outcomes. Existing studies are scarce, fragmented, and lack control for confounders. This study aimed to explore the functional prognosis of isolated closed extra-articular multimetatarsal fractures and the different outcomes between the plate-screw and K-wire fixation. This retrospective study included 79 patients who underwent surgery for isolated closed extra-articular multimetatarsal fractures from May 2017 to December 2020. We recorded baseline characteristics. The primary outcome measure was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Exploratory correlation analysis of the variables with VAS, AOFAS score, and FAOS was performed. The differences between the plate-screw group (n = 58) and K-wire group (n = 21) were compared. Seventy-nine patients (79 feet) were included with a follow-up of (47.3 ± 12.7) months (range, 26-70). Full weight bearing time was (11.7±5.3) weeks. VAS was (1.4±1.8) points, AOFAS score was (86.4±13.3) points, and FAOS was (79.0±11.1) points. Complications were observed in 17 cases (21.5%). According to exploratory correlation analysis, VAS was weakly associated with fixation method and gender, AOFAS was weakly associated with fixation method, FAOS was weakly associated with trauma mechanism. When the plate-screw group (n = 58) was compared with the K-wire group (n = 21), we found the former was superior to the latter in terms of full weight bearing time, VAS, AOFAS score, and malunion rate (all p < .05). FAOS was nonsignificant (p = .056). Operative treatment of isolated closed extra-articular multimetatarsal fractures showed good mid-term results. Plate-screw fixation was associated with faster rehabilitation as well as a lower malunion rate. The mid-term follow-up results showed patients with plate-screw fixation had better VAS and AOFAS scores.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo , Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas Cerradas , Huesos Metatarsianos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía
15.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 915, 2023 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38012651

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic diagnostic criteria and propose standardised radiographic criteria for Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The various radiographic criteria for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries were extracted. Descriptive statistics were presented for all continuous (as mean ± standard deviation) and categorical variables (as frequencies by percentages). RESULTS: The literature search included 29 studies that totalled 1115 Lisfranc injuries. The risk of bias ranged from "Low" to "Moderate" risk according to the ROBINS-I tool. The overall recommendations according to the GRADE assessment ranged from "Very Low" to "High". 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis was the most common of the 12 various radiographic diagnostic criteria observed, as was employed in 18 studies. This was followed by 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation, as was employed in 11 studies. CONCLUSION: The radiographic diagnostic criteria of Lisfranc injuries were heterogeneous. The proposition for homogenous radiographic diagnostic criteria is that the following features must be observed for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries: 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis of ≥ 2 mm on anteroposterior view or 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation on anteroposterior or oblique views. Further advanced imaging by CT or MRI may be required in patients with normal radiographs but with continued suspicion for Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, systematic review.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Luxaciones Articulares , Huesos Metatarsianos , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Radiografía , Huesos Metatarsianos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen
16.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1672023 10 04.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823878

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injury is rare and often very subtle. Subsequently, 20-50% of injuries are initially missed. Late or missed diagnosis increases the risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. CASE: A 51-year old men visited our surgical outpatient clinic with plantar hematoma and inability to bear weight on the right foot after he tripped three weeks earlier. Initial visitation to the emergency department after trauma led to the diagnosis contusion or ligament injury of the foot/ankle. After additional CT-scan of the foot, the final diagnosis of subtle/stable Lisfranc injury was made. Twelve weeks after trauma, the patient still experienced pain and was dissatisfied with the course of treatment. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis of Lisfranc injury is important to ensure adequate treatment may take place immediately. This achieves the most optimal prognosis. Always think of Lisfranc joint injury in case of plantar hematoma together with an inability to bear weight of the foot.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Luxaciones Articulares , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Ligamentos , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior , Hematoma , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/etiología
18.
Emerg Med J ; 40(8): 569-575, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37173124

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ankle injuries are one of the most common presentations in the ED. Although fractures can be ruled out using the Ottawa Ankle Rules, the specificity is low, which means many patients may still receive unnecessary radiographs. Even once fractures are ruled out, assessment of ankle stability is recommended to rule out ruptures, but the anterior drawer test has only moderate sensitivity and low specificity and should be performed only after swelling has receded. Ultrasound could be a reliable, cheap and radiation free alternative to diagnose fractures and ligamentous injuries. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing ankle injuries. METHODS: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to 15 February 2022 to include studies of patients of 16 years or older presenting to the ED with acute ankle or foot injury, who underwent ultrasound and had diagnostic accuracy as outcome. No restrictions were applied for date and language. Risk of bias and quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach were assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies evaluating 1455 patients with bony injuries were included. In 10 studies, the reported sensitivity for fracture was >90%, but varied among studies between 76% (95% CI 63% to 86%) and 100% (95% CI 29% to 100%). In nine studies, the reported specificity was at least 91%, but varied between 85% (95% CI 74% to 92%) and 100% (95% CI 88% to 100%).Six studies including 337 patients examined the use of ultrasound for ligamentous injuries and found a sensitivity and specificity >94% and 100%. Overall quality of evidence for both bony and ligamentous injuries was low and very low. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound has the potential to be a reliable method for diagnosing foot and ankle injuries, however, higher grade evidence is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020215258.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ultrasonografía , Traumatismos del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen
19.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ; 27(3): 283-292, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37230128

RESUMEN

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are a frequent finding in athletes, particularly of the foot and ankle. A BSI is caused by recurring microtrauma to the cortical or trabecular bone exceeding the repair capacity of normal bone. The most frequent fractures at the ankle are low risk, characterized by a low risk for nonunion. These include the posteromedial tibia, the calcaneus, and the metatarsal diaphysis. High-risk stress fractures have a higher risk for nonunion and need more aggressive treatment. Examples are the medial malleolus, navicular bone, and the base of the second and fifth metatarsal bone.Imaging features depend on the primary involvement of cortical versus trabecular bone. Conventional radiographs may remain normal up to 2 to 3 weeks. For cortical bone, early signs of BSIs are a periosteal reaction or the "gray cortex sign," followed by cortical thickening and fracture line depiction. In trabecular bone, a sclerotic dense line may be seen. Magnetic resonance imaging enables early detection of BSIs and can differentiate between a stress reaction and a fracture. We review typical anamnestic/clinical findings, epidemiology and risk factors, imaging characteristics, and findings at typical locations of BSIs at the foot and ankle that may help guide treatment strategy and patient recovery.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Pies , Fracturas por Estrés , Humanos , Tobillo , Fracturas por Estrés/diagnóstico por imagen , Extremidad Inferior , Articulación del Tobillo , Radiografía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Foot (Edinb) ; 54: 101977, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36841140

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Historically, most Lisfranc injuries have been considered to be unstable and treated with surgical intervention. However, with better access to cross-sectional imaging, stable injury patterns are starting to be recognised. The aims of the current study were to perform a systematic review of outcomes of Lisfranc injuries treated non-operatively. METHODS: A literature review was performed of studies reporting nonoperative management of Lisfranc injuries (PROSPERO registered and following PRISMA guidelines). Following exclusions, 8 papers were identified: 1 prospective and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 220 patients were studied with a mean age of 39.8 years and a mean follow-up of 4.3 years. Outcomes included function, displacement, and rates of surgery. RESULTS: High heterogeneity was observed with variable outcomes. Four papers reported good outcomes, with adjusted functional scores ranging from 82.6 to 100 (out of 100). However, one study reported late displacement in 54 % of patients. Rates of secondary osteoarthritis ranged from 5 % to 38 %. Rates of surgical intervention were as high as 56 %. Several studies compared operative to non-operative treatment, reporting superior outcomes with surgery. Those injuries with no displacement on CT, measured at the medial cuneiform-second metatarsal had the best outcomes. CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries vary widely, including high rates of conversion to surgery. In contrast, some studies have reported excellent functional outcomes. CT seems to be an important diagnostic tool in defining a stable injury. Due to limited data and lack of a clear definition of a stable injury or treatment protocol, prospective research is needed to determine which Lisfranc injuries can be safely treated nonoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Traumatismos de los Pies , Articulaciones del Pie , Adulto , Humanos , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Pies/terapia , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Huesos Metatarsianos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Articulaciones del Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones del Pie/lesiones , Articulaciones del Pie/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA