RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Triptans revolutionized the acute treatment of migraine; however, varied responses to triptans, as a result of poor efficacy and tolerability, are reported. A standardized definition of triptan non-response was recently proposed by the European Headache Federation (EHF). There is currently limited data available on the prevalence of triptan non-response. METHODS: We used clinic letters over a two-year duration to evaluate the triptan response and triptan efficacy or tolerability failure, or both, in a London-based tertiary headache service. RESULTS: In total, 419 adult migraine patients (females: 83.8%, age: 46 ± 18 years, chronic migraine: 88.5%) were included in a service evaluation. In line with the EHF definitions, "triptan non-response" was seen in 63.8% of patients (264/414), whereas 37.7% of patients (156/414) had failed at least two triptans (EHF "triptan resistant") and 4.6% of patients (19/414) had failed at least three triptans, including a subcutaneous formulation (EHF "triptan refractory"). Notably, 21.3% of patients (88/414) had failed at least three triptans inclusive and exclusive of subcutaneous triptan use. Advancing age (p < 0.001) and the presence of medication overuse (p = 0.006) increased the probability of triptan response, whereas an increased number of failed preventives (p < 0.001) and the use of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (p = 0.022) increased the probability of triptan non-response. The largest proportion of patients responded to eletriptan (49.5%), followed by nasal zolmitriptan (44.4%) and rizatriptan (35.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight an alarming prevalence of triptan non-response among adult migraineurs receiving treatment in a London-based tertiary headache service. It is imperative for clinicians to explore methods to optimize acute medication efficacy, whether this comprises changing to a triptan with a superior response rate, advocating for early intervention or considering alternative acute medication classes, such as gepants or ditans.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a new avenue for treating migraine. The efficacy and safety of intravenous Lu AG09222, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the PACAP ligand, for migraine prevention are unclear. METHODS: In a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adult participants (18 to 65 years of age) with migraine for whom two to four previous preventive treatments had failed to provide a benefit. The trial included a 4-week treatment period and an 8-week follow-up period. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to receive a single-dose baseline infusion of 750 mg of Lu AG09222, 100 mg of Lu AG09222, or placebo. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in the number of migraine days per month, during weeks 1 through 4, in the Lu AG09222 750-mg group as compared with the placebo group. RESULTS: Of 237 participants enrolled, 97 received 750 mg of Lu AG09222, 46 received 100 mg of Lu AG09222, and 94 received placebo. The mean number of baseline migraine days per month was 16.7 in the overall population, and the mean change from baseline over weeks 1 through 4 was -6.2 days in the Lu AG09222 750-mg group, as compared with -4.2 days in the placebo group (difference, -2.0 days; 95% confidence interval, -3.8 to -0.3; P = 0.02). Adverse events with a higher incidence in the Lu AG09222 750-mg group than in the placebo group during the 12-week observation period included coronavirus disease 2019 (7% vs. 3%), nasopharyngitis (7% vs. 4%), and fatigue (5% vs. 1%). CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 trial, a single intravenous infusion of 750 mg of Lu AG09222 showed superiority over placebo in reducing migraine frequency over the subsequent 4 weeks. (Funded by H. Lundbeck; HOPE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05133323.).

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: About a quarter of migraine cases among women have menstrual migraine (MM), which is usually more severe, longer lasting, and less responsive to treatment than typical migraine. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of several medication in the acute and preventive treatment of MM; this meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS: We conducted systematic searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. The primary outcomes of acute treatment trials were pain relief at 2 and 24 h after treatment compared with placebo or another treatment. The three endpoints we checked for studying MM prevention were: no recurrence of headaches each month, a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days from baseline, and a decrease in the mean number of headache days per month. RESULTS: Out of 342 studies, 26 RCTs met the criteria. Triptans, combined with or without other analgesics, were superior to placebo in providing pain relief in the acute treatment and prevention of MM. Among the treatments, sumatriptan and lasmiditan demonstrated superior pain relief at 2 h (OR: 4.62) and 24 h (OR: 4.81). Frovatriptan exhibited effectiveness in preventing headache recurrence, whereas galcanezumab and erenumab displayed significant preventive benefits in reducing headache days per month. CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan and lasmiditan are effective first-line treatments for acute MM. For prevention, frovatriptan may be the more effective of triptans. Compared with triptans, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, here including erenumab and galcanezumab, are more effective in reducing headache days, and therefore, in preventing MM.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies have emerged as promising therapeutic options for the treatment of chronic migraine. However, treatment response varies considerably among individuals, suggesting a potential role for genetic factors. This study aimed to identify genetic variants affecting the efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy in chronic migraine among the Han Chinese population in Taiwan to enhance treatment precision and to understand the genetic architecture of migraine. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative trait locus (QTL) association study in patients with chronic migraines from a tertiary medical center in Taiwan using the Taiwan Precision Medicine Array Chip. The patients received fremanezumab or galcanezumab for at least 12 weeks. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on the improvement rate in monthly migraine days. Genetic variants were identified, and their associations with treatment efficacy were examined through quantitative trait loci analysis, linkage disequilibrium studies, and functional annotations using the Gene Ontology database. RESULTS: Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relative variants were significantly associated with anti-CGRP therapy response (p < 1 × 10- 7): rs116870564, rs75244870, rs56216870, rs12938101, rs74655790, and rs149540851. These variants are located in or near genes, including LRRC4C, ATAD2B, and OXR1, which are involved in neuronal development, DNA-dependent ATPase activity, and oxidation-reduction processes, respectively. The rs116870564 variant in LRRC4C showed the strongest association (ß = -0.551, p = 6.65 × 10- 9). The functional impact of these variants is attributed to their regulatory effects on gene expression, which are influenced by intron splicing regulation, transcription factors, and changes in chromatin structure. CONCLUSION: The identification of key genetic markers associated with response to anti-CGRP therapy emphasizes the importance of genetic variability in treatment efficacy. This could lead to more personalized chronic migraine management strategies and tailored therapeutic approaches based on individual genetic profiles. Further research in larger, diverse populations is warranted to validate these findings and refine our understanding of the role of CGRP in chronic migraine pathophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is the second most common type of primary headache disorder in Europe, accounting for 2.8% of visits to emergency departments. Some studies have shown that emergency departments may approach the disorder in ways that may be insufficient or inadequate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted of patients with migraine who were discharged from the adult emergency department of the Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio in 2020. Variables related to their healthcare were analysed. RESULTS: 73.9% were women, with a mean age of 38 years. They were not asked about the frequency of their migraines. The mean length of time patients spent in the emergency department before receiving initial medical care was 45 minutes (standard deviation: 41). Computed tomography scans were requested for 27.4% of the patients, and these were not pathological. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly used treatment for the symptoms. Opioids were also used. Preventive treatments were prescribed in 6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Management of migraines by emergency departments is limited, and as such continuous and updated training is important. The use of triptans and occipital nerve blocks should be encouraged, and the use of opioids, among other drugs, should cease.

TITLE: Manejo de la migraña en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado en el Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío.Introducción. La migraña es el segundo tipo de cefalea primaria más frecuente en Europa y supone el 2,8% de las visitas a los servicios de urgencias. Algunos estudios muestran que su abordaje en urgencias puede ser insuficiente o inadecuado. Materiales y métodos. Se realiza un estudio observacional retrospectivo en pacientes con migraña a los que se les dio de alta en 2020 del servicio de urgencias de adultos del Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío. Se analizan las variables relacionadas con su atención sanitaria. Resultados. El 73,9% fueron mujeres, con una edad media de 38 años. En ningún caso se preguntó por la frecuencia de las crisis. El tiempo medio de estancia hasta la primera asistencia médica fue de 45 minutos (desviación estándar: 41). Se solicitaron tomografías computarizadas para el 27,4% de los pacientes, que no fueron patológicas. El tratamiento sintomático más usado fueron los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos. También se usaron opioides. Se prescribieron preventivos en el 6% de los casos. Conclusiones. El manejo de las migrañas en los servicios de urgencias es subóptimo, por lo que es importante una formación continuada y actualizada. Debe potenciarse el uso de los triptanes y el bloqueo del nervio occipital, y abandonarse el uso de los opioides, entre otros.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a highly prevalent and complex neurovascular disease. However, the currently available therapeutic drugs often fall to adequately meet clinical needs due to limited effectiveness and numerous undesirable side effects. This study aims to identify putative novel targets for migraine treatment through proteome-wide Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS: We utilized MR to estimate the causal effects of plasma proteins on migraine and its two subtypes, migraine with aura (MA) and without aura (MO). This analysis integrated plasma protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) data with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) findings for these migraine phenotypes. Moreover, we conducted a phenome-wide MR assessment, enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction networks construction, and mediation MR analysis to further validate the pharmaceutical potential of the identified protein targets. RESULTS: We identified 35 protein targets for migraine and its subtypes (p < 8.04 × 10-6), with prioritized targets showing minimal side effects. Phenome-wide MR identified novel protein targets-FCAR, UBE2L6, LATS1, PDCD1LG2, and MMP3-that have no major disease side effects and interacted with current acute migraine medication targets. Additionally, MMP3, PDCD1LG2, and HBQ1 interacted with current preventive migraine medication targets. The causal effects of plasma protein on migraine were partly mediated by plasma metabolites (proportion of mediation from 3.8% to 21.0%). CONCLUSIONS: A set of potential protein targets for migraine and its subtypes were identified. These proteins showed rare side effects and were responsible for biological mechanisms involved in migraine pathogenesis, indicating priority for the development of migraine treatments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most real-world data on CGRP mAbs have been published from high-income countries such as the USA, Western countries, Japan, Korea, and Singapore. However, data from low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia is lacking. This is the first real-world study from Thailand to describe the efficacy of CGRP mAbs therapy in migraine patients and to analyze the response trends between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, real-world retrospective chart review study with an observation period of 6 months after CGRP mAbs initiation. We aim to compare treatment responses to CGRP mAbs between EM and CM patients. RESULTS: A total of 47 Thai patients were enrolled (median [IQR] age 37.2 [28.6-50.4] years; 85.1%F, 44.7% EM; 70.2% galcanezumab). There was no difference in baseline characteristics and migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) between EM and CM. The overall ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 70% monthly migraine day reduction rates at 6 months were 89.0%, 71.6%, and 58.5% with higher responders in EM. There was a significant decrease in monthly headache days (MHDs) over time (adjusted ß = -0.42, p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in MIDAS score over time after the initiation of CGRP mAbs (adjusted ß = -1.12, p = 0.003). However, there were no differences between the two diagnoses. There was no significant decrease in the number of abortive medication pills used over time after the initiation of CGRP mAbs. CM had a significantly steeper trend compared to those with EM. CONCLUSION: The first real-world study in Thailand demonstrated that CGRP mAbs therapy had efficacy for migraine treatment, as evidenced by a reduction in MHDs, decreased disability, and reduced use of abortive medications. Additionally, the response pattern to CGRP mAbs therapy was similar between EM and CM in terms of MHDs reduction and MIDAS score improvement.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The term 'precision medicine' encompasses strategies to optimize diagnosis and outcome prediction and to tailor treatment for individual patients, in consideration of their unique characteristics. The greater availability of multifaceted datasets and strategies to model such data have made precision medicine increasingly possible in recent years. Precision medicine is especially needed in the migraine field since the response to migraine treatments is not universal amongst all individuals with migraine. OBJECTIVE: To provide a narrative review describing contributions to achieving precision medicine for migraine treatment. METHODS: A search of PubMed for English language articles of human participants published from 2005 to January 2024 was conducted to identify articles that reported research contributing to precision medicine for migraine treatment. The published literature was categorized and summarized according to the type of data that were included: clinical phenotypes, genomics, proteomics, physiologic measures, and brain imaging. RESULTS: Published studies have investigated characteristics associated with acute and preventive treatment responses, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triptans, onabotulinumtoxinA, and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, in patients with episodic or chronic migraine. There is evidence that clinical, genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, physiologic, and brain imaging features might associate with migraine treatment outcomes, although inconsistencies for such findings clearly exist. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature suggests that there are clinical and biological features which associate with, and might be useful for predicting, migraine treatment responses. To achieve precision medicine for migraine treatment, further research is needed that validates and expands on existing findings and tests the accuracy and value of migraine treatment prediction models in clinical settings.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tension-type headache (TTH) and migraine are prevalent neurological conditions in children and adolescents that significantly impact activity of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL). Although physical therapy targeting cervical myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) on TTH and migraine has been extensively studied in adults, the efficacy in pediatric patients remains unexplored. The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of physical therapy integrated with pharmacotherapy on TTH and migraine in children and adolescents. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study recruiting consecutive patients aged 6 to 18 years with TTH and migraine with cervical MTrPs. They were classified into 4 types of headaches: frequent episodic TTH (FRTTH), chronic TTH (CTTH), episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). The once-weekly 40-minutes physical therapy session integrated with pharmacotherapy (integrated physical therapy) was continued until the treatment goals (headache days per week less than 2 days, headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) score to below of 50, and the ability to attend school daily) was achieved. Multifaceted assessments including headache frequency (headache days per week), headache intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pain catastrophizing score (PCS), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) score, HIT-6 scores, and EuroQol 5 dimensions 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L) scores, were conducted to evaluate the treatment effects. RESULTS: 161 patients were enrolled in this study. 106 patients (65.8%) were diagnosed with TTH: 70 (66.8%) with FETHH, 36 (34.0%) with CTTH, and 55 patients (34.2%) were diagnosed with migraine: 43 patients (78.2%) with EM, 12 patients (21.8%) with CM. We observed significant improvements in headache frequency, headache intensity, PCS, HADS score, HIT-6 scores, and EQ-5D-5 L scores before and after the treatment in all 4 types of headaches. The average number of sessions required to achieve the treatment goals was 4 times (weeks) for patients with FETTH and EM, 5.5 for those with CTTH, and 7.5 for those with chronic migraine. CONCLUSION: The integrated physical therapy on pediatric TTH and migraine patients with the cervical MTrPs was significantly effective in reducing headache symptoms and improving ADL and QOL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine. The PRODROME trial previously demonstrated that ubrogepant treatment during prodrome prevents the onset of moderate or severe headache. In this analysis of the PRODROME trial, the benefits of ubrogepant treatment during the prodrome on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are evaluated. METHODS: PRODROME was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial that enrolled adults who experienced 2-8 migraine attacks per month with moderate-severe headache pain. Eligible participants treated 2 qualifying prodrome events, defined as a migraine attack with prodromal symptoms when the participant was confident a headache would follow within 1-6 hours. Participants were randomized to treatment sequence A (placebo then ubrogepant 100 mg) or sequence B (ubrogepant 100 mg then placebo). This analysis evaluated the ability to function normally over 24 hours (secondary end point) and at specific time points after dose (additional end point). Other PRO end points included activity limitation over 24 hours and satisfaction with study medication at 8 and 24 hours. RESULTS: Of 518 randomized participants, 477 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. After treatment of qualifying prodrome events, a significantly greater ability to function normally over 24 hours was observed for participants after treatment with ubrogepant 100 mg compared with placebo (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.40-1.96; p < 0.0001). As early as 2 hours after dose, a greater proportion of ubrogepant-treated participants reported "no disability, able to function normally" compared with placebo (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.32-2.35; nominal p = 0.0001). Ubrogepant administered during the prodrome was also associated with a greater reduction in activity limitations over 24 hours after dose (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.61-2.67; nominal p < 0.0001). At 8 and 24 hours after dose, rates of being "satisfied" or "extremely satisfied" were greater for ubrogepant than for placebo (8 hours: OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.78-3.15; nominal p < 0.0001; 24 hours: OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.78-3.02; nominal p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Ubrogepant 100 mg administered during the prodrome was associated with significantly greater ability to function normally, greater reduction in activity limitations over 24 hours, and greater satisfaction with study medication, compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04492020. Submitted: July 27, 2020; first patient enrolled: August 21, 2020. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04492020. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that taking ubrogepant 100 mg during a migraine prodrome allows more patients to function normally over the next 24 hours.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder impacting millions worldwide. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) has emerged as a key player in migraine pathophysiology, leading to the development of targeted therapies. This study reviews novel CGRP-targeted treatments, including monoclonal antibodies small molecule inhibitors/nutraceuticals and introduces Asarinin as a potential modulator of the pathway. Asarinin, a natural compound found in various plants, is examined for its pharmacological potential in migraine management. Pharmacokinetic assessments, toxicological modelling, molecular property analysis, and network pharmacology were conducted. Molecular docking and dynamics studies with CGRP reveal potential interactions, providing a foundation for understanding Asarinin's therapeutic effects. Asarinin's favourable pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and bioactivity, supporting its candidacy as a therapeutic agent. In-depth molecular docking studies with the CGRP receptor (PDB: 6ZHO) demonstrate strong binding affinity (- 10.3kcal/mol), while molecular dynamics simulations unveil the dynamic behavior of the Asarinin-CGRP complex, (- 10.53 kcal/mol) for Atogepant-CGRP complex. Network analysis highlights key proteins in migraine pathology, indicating Asarinin's potential efficacy. The groundwork for future investigations, suggests Asarinin as a promising candidate for migraine management by targeting OPRM1 pathway. The integration of diverse assessments provides a comprehensive understanding of Asarinin's potential and paves the way for further preclinical and clinical research.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orally administered second-generation gepants are effective for the treatment of migraine. The intranasal administration of the third-generation gepant zavegepant might have additional benefits including a rapid onset of action, but it is not clear yet to which extent this has clinical relevance. METHODS: We examined the effect of zavegepant on the relaxations induced by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in human isolated middle meningeal arteries. Furthermore, we connected the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of gepants by combining data from clinical and basic research. RESULTS: We showed that 10 nM zavegepant potently antagonized the functional response to CGRP. We also showed that all gepants are effective at inhibiting functional responses to CGRP at their therapeutic plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low predicted potency of zavegepant to inhibit CGRP-induced relaxation at therapeutic systemic plasma concentrations may point to the relevance of local delivery to the trigeminovascular system through intranasal administration. This approach may have additional benefits for various groups of patients, including overweight patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) was first linked to beneficial effects in migraine 25 years ago and was approved by the FDA for preventive treatment of chronic migraine in 2010. The treatment has since had a major impact on the well-being of people with chronic migraine. The clinical development programme for BTX-A and research since its approval have provided insights into the neuromodulatory sensory effect of BTX-A, how it can control chronic migraine despite its peripheral action, and the underlying biology of migraine as a disease. In this Review, we consider the impact that BTX-A has had on the management of chronic migraine and on the research field. We discuss the insights provided by clinical research, encompassing the clinical trials and subsequent real-world evidence, and the mechanistic insights provided by preclinical and translational research. We also provide an overview of future directions of research in the field BTX-A in migraine and the clinical translation of this research.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications. METHODS: An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group. RESULTS: A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained. CONCLUSION: Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence indicates a metabolic etiology for migraines, with ketosis potentially rectifying metabolic and clinical features. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate CER-0001, a ketogenic agent, for migraine prevention without dietary changes. METHODS: This was a 2-part, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study conducted in Australia. Adults with at least a 1-year history of migraine and ≥ 1 prior preventive treatment failure were randomised to either oral CER-0001 (up to 30 g twice a day) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was Month 3 change in Migraine Headache Days from baseline. RESULTS: Part 1 results are presented. 81 participants were randomised and dosed (n = 40 CER-0001, n = 41 placebo), and 61 participants had evaluable efficacy data. No statistically significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint (LSMean difference 0.92 days; p = 0.586). During Month 2, a mean improvement of -2.8 days was observed for CER-0001 (p = 0.056). Withdrawal rates were 45.0% and 53.7% (CER-0001; placebo). The proportion of participants reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was similar between arms (90.0% CER-0001, 82.9% placebo), mostly gastrointestinal (85.0% CER-0001, 70.7% placebo). CONCLUSION: Results suggest positive directional promise over 2-3 months for CER-0001. A new formulation will be used for larger, fully powered phase 2/3 studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04437199).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and direct costs incurred over 12 months following initiation of galcanezumab (GMB) or standard-of-care (SOC) preventive migraine treatments have been evaluated. However, a gap in knowledge exists in understanding longer-term HCRU and direct costs. OBJECTIVE: To compare all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs in patients with migraine initiating GMB or SOC preventive migraine treatments over a 24-month follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective study used Optum deidentified Market Clarity Data. The study included adults diagnosed with migraine, with at least 1 claim for GMB or SOC preventive migraine therapy (September 2018 to March 2020), with continuous enrollment for 12 months before and 24 months after (follow-up) the index date (date of first GMB or SOC claim). Propensity score (PS) matching (1:1) was used to balance cohorts. All-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs for GMB vs SOC cohorts were reported as mean (SD) per patient per year (PPPY) over a 24-month follow-up and compared using a Z-test. Costs were inflated to 2022 US$. RESULTS: After PS matching, 2,307 patient pairs (mean age: 44.4 years; female sex: 87.3%) were identified. Compared with the SOC cohort, the GMB cohort had lower mean (SD) PPPY all-cause office visits (17.9 [17.7] vs 19.1 [18.7]; P = 0.023) and migraine-related office visits (2.6 [3.3] vs 3.0 [4.7]; P = 0.002) at follow-up. No significant differences were observed between cohorts in other all-cause and migraine-related events assessed including outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. The mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort compared with the SOC cohort for all-cause office visits ($4,321 [7,518] vs $5,033 [7,211]; P < 0.001) at follow-up. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY all-cause total costs ($24,704 [30,705] vs $21,902 [28,213]; P = 0.001) and pharmacy costs ($9,507 [12,659] vs $5,623 [12,605]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. Mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort for migraine-related office visits ($806 [1,690] vs $1,353 [2,805]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY migraine-related total costs ($8,248 [11,486] vs $5,047 [9,749]; P < 0.001) and migraine-related pharmacy costs ($5,394 [3,986] vs $1,761 [4,133]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. There were no significant differences between cohorts in all-cause and migraine-related costs for outpatient visits, ED visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. CONCLUSIONS: Although total costs were greater for GMB vs SOC following initiation, changes in a few categories of all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs were lower for GMB over a 24-month follow-up. Additional analysis evaluating indirect health care costs may offer insights into further cost savings incurred with preventive migraine treatment.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)