Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 11.406
Filtrar
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 20841, 2024 09 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39242786

RESUMEN

Following on from our pilot studies, this study aimed to test the efficacy of a combination of probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus), magnesium orotate and coenzyme 10 for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) through a double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial. The participants were 120 adults diagnosed with MDD randomised to daily oral administration, over 8 weeks, of either the intervention or placebo, with a 16-week follow-up period. Intent-to-treat analysis found a significantly lower frequency of the presence of a major depressive episode in the intervention group compared with placebo at the end of the 8-week treatment phase, with no difference between the two conditions at 8-week follow-up. Both the categorical and continuous measure of depressive symptoms showed a significant difference between the two conditions at 4 weeks, but not 8 and 16 weeks. The secondary end-point was demonstrated with an overall reduction in self-rated symptoms of anxiety and stress in the active treatment group compared with placebo. These findings suggest that the combination of probiotics, magnesium orotate and coenzyme 10 may be an effective treatment of MDD over an 8-week period.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Probióticos , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lactobacillus acidophilus , Bifidobacterium bifidum , Streptococcus thermophilus
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 85(4)2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39240698

RESUMEN

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder for which pharmacologic standard-of-care treatments have limited efficacy, particularly among individuals with cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction is observed in approximately 25%-50% of those with MDD, wherein response to standard-of-care medications is reduced. Vortioxetine is an approved antidepressant that has shown evidence of procognitive effects in patients. It is not known if it has greater clinical efficacy in MDD patients with cognitive dysfunction, a more difficult to treat population, than other antidepressants.Methods: This study was a reanalysis of 1,812 subjects with MDD across 4 placebo controlled trials. Baseline cognition was measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the primary measure used to demonstrate vortioxetine's procognitive effects in clinical studies. Analyses examined whether baseline cognitive function was associated with differences in treatment outcomes.Results: Baseline DSST did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depressive symptoms (pooled Cohen d = -0.02, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.07). Analyses of additional cognitive measures similarly did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects on depression (all 95% CI contained zero). Finally, analyses of trials with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as active comparators also revealed no prediction of SSRI/SNRI adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depression.Conclusions: These findings, taken together, suggest that cognitive function does not moderate depression outcomes in vortioxetine, with results comparable to other antidepressants.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Vortioxetina , Humanos , Vortioxetina/uso terapéutico , Vortioxetina/farmacología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Disfunción Cognitiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico
3.
PLoS One ; 19(9): e0309562, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226275

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To collect evidence on the possibility that patients with depression experience self-stigmatization based on label information for medications. METHODS: We developed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey instrument that asked respondents to make choices between hypothetical treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). We also included treatment type (antidepressants versus antipsychotics) and approved indications for the medication. The choice questions mimicked the information presented in product inserts and required systematic tradeoffs between treatment efficacy, treatment type, and indication. We calculated how many patients were willing to forgo efficacy to avoid treatments with information associated with self-stigmatization, and how much efficacy they were willing to forgo. We also evaluated the impact of contextualizing the treatment information to reduce self-stigmatization by randomizing respondents who received additional context. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients with MDD were recruited to complete the DCE survey. Respondents had well-defined preferences for treatment outcomes. Over 60% (63.4%) of respondents were found to be significantly affected by treatment indication. These respondents were willing to forgo about 2.5 percentage points in the chance of treatment efficacy to avoid treatments indicated for schizophrenia. We also find that some level of contextualization of the treatment details could help reduce the negative impact of treatment type and indications. CONCLUSIONS: Product-label treatment indication can potentially lead to patient self-stigmatization as shown by patients' avoidance of treatments that are also used to treat schizophrenia. While the effect appears to be relatively small, results suggests that the issue is likely pervasive.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Conducta de Elección , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Prioridad del Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Etiquetado de Medicamentos , Estereotipo , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Estigma Social
4.
Turk Psikiyatri Derg ; 35(3): 186-197, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224991

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) increase suicide risk, especially in young adults, is still a controversial issue. This study aimed to examine the change in impulsivity characteristics and to evaluate the relationship between impulsivity and suicidality in young adults with major depression who were started on SSRIs. METHOD: The study included 50 patients between the ages of 18-24 years with a diagnosis of major depression who were planned to start SSRIs. Participants were evaluated with the Beck Depression Scale, Beck Anxiety Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, Barratt Impulsivity Scale, Daily Impulsivity Scale (DIS), and Go/ No-Go Task (GNG) before and at the end of the first week of treatment. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the patients (n: 35) completed the assessments at baseline and at the end of the first week. At the end of one-week there was a statistically significant decrease in the DIS (t=2.283, p=0.029) and commission errors in GNG (t=3.19, p=0.003). In addition, 7 out of 11 patients who had suicidal ideation at the first evaluation did not continue to have suicidal ideation at the end of the first week and there was a significant decrease in the severity of suicidal ideation at the end of the follow-up (W:132.0, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: One-week SSRI use in young adults resulted in a decrease in impulsivity in self-report scales assessing state impulsivity and in the GNG. It was observed that the severity of suicidal ideation decreased at the end of the one-week treatment period.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Conducta Impulsiva , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Humanos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Conducta Impulsiva/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Ideación Suicida , Adulto
5.
Brain Behav ; 14(9): e70024, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39262174

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study evaluated the efficacy of major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after 2-3 months of acute treatment based on the dual factors of education and age. METHODS: This study classified the included patients into four groups using two classification parameters: age (≤45 years, vs. >45 years) and education years (≤12 vs. >12). We analyzed age, gender, marital status, personal income, depression onset history, medication use, and follow-up across various groups. We evaluated residual somatic symptoms and social functioning in depression patients was conducted using the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-report (QIDS-SR16), the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ15), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). RESULTS: In China, 16 hospitals, 553 depression patients, and 428 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Baseline patient data revealed significant differences among the different age groups in gender, marital status, income, first onset age, physical illness, combination of antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines use (all p < .05). Statistically significant differences were observed in overall comparisons among the four groups, encompassing the QIDS-SR16 score, PHQ15 score, and various SDS parameters (all p < .05). However, no statistically significant differences (all p > .05) were found in residual somatic symptoms and social functioning parameters between different education levels (≤12 years vs. >12 years) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, based on total scores on the scale. Repeated measures mixed model indicates that the QIDS-SR16 assessment indicates statistical differences among various marital statuses, income levels, medical histories, and antipsychotic medication use (p < .05). Furthermore, PHQ-15 and SDS assessments reveal statistical differences between single and married/cohabiting statuses, physical comorbidities, 3 and 6 months follow-ups compared to baseline (p < .05). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that compared to depressive patients >45 years old, those ≤45 years old often exhibit more residual depression, somatic symptoms, and severe social functional impairment; patients' education levels less influence this trend.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Escolaridad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , China/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Edad , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMJ Open ; 14(9): e091214, 2024 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260834

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD), the second leading cause of disability globally, is considered to be associated with a consequent deterioration in the quality of life and can lead to a major economic burden on medical service and suicide-related costs. Previous research has shown that acupuncture may be beneficial for treating MDD. However, there is a lack of rigorous evidence from previous studies comparing acupuncture with antidepressant medications. This study aims to assess the therapeutic potential of acupuncture in the management of depressive disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, randomised, participant-blind, sham-controlled, 2×2 factorial clinical trial, Acupuncture and Escitalopram for Treating Major Depression Clinical Study, aims to compare the efficacy of acupuncture versus escitalopram in treating depression. This study will be conducted at three hospitals in China, enrolling 260 patients with moderate-to-severe major depression, as defined by DSM-5 criteria and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) Scores above 17. Participants will be randomly assigned in equal proportions to one of four groups (acupuncture/escitalopram, sham acupuncture/escitalopram, acupuncture/placebo and sham acupuncture/placebo) and undergo 30 sessions across 10 weeks. The primary outcome is change in HDRS-17 Score and secondary outcomes include BDI, Clinical Global Impression, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Mini-Mental State Examination Scores, alongside potential biological markers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Ethics Committees of the Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2023-7th-HIRB-020), Shanghai Mental Health Centre (2022-86) and Shanghai Pudong New Area Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2023-003). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study's findings are intended for publication in a scholarly journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05901571.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Escitalopram , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Adulto , Escitalopram/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , China , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Terapia Combinada , Calidad de Vida , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Citalopram/uso terapéutico
7.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1456: 49-66, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261423

RESUMEN

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder, associated with substantial burden and large economical costs. Notwithstanding various conventional antidepressant treatment options, a large portion of depressed people (ca. 30%) fails to respond to first-line treatment, resulting in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although non-response to multiple antidepressant interventions is a common outcome, a consensus definition of TRD is not yet available. In practice, TRD is applied when two or more successive treatments with different antidepressants are not working. The last decade's intense research into new medicines for TRD has led to two developments, using typical or serotonergic (psilocybin, ayahuasca) and atypical (glutamatergic) psychedelics (ketamine, esketamine). Both approaches, although via different entrance mechanism, exhibit a fast onset but also long-lasting antidepressant effect far beyond the biological presence of the drug in the body, strongly indicating that downstream mechanisms activated by signaling cascades in the brain are involved. The present chapter describes the clinical development of psilocybin and esketamine for TRD and discusses the problems involved in the use of a proper placebo because of the psychotomimetic (psilocybin) or dissociative (ketamine) effects that interfere with performing "blind" studies. Nevertheless, intranasal esketamine was developed and approved for TRD, whereas psilocybin has shown positive results. Adverse effects and tolerability of both drugs in the dose ranges used are generally acceptable. The emergence of anti-TRD medicines for treatment of a very severe disease is a breakthrough in psychiatry.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Alucinógenos , Ketamina , Psilocibina , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Alucinógenos/uso terapéutico , Alucinógenos/efectos adversos , Alucinógenos/farmacología , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Psilocibina/uso terapéutico , Psilocibina/efectos adversos , Psilocibina/farmacología , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/farmacología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1456: 27-48, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261422

RESUMEN

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mental health disorder associated with cognitive impairment, dysregulated appetite, fatigue, insomnia or hypersomnia, and severe mood changes that significantly impact the ability of the affected individual to perform day-to-day tasks, leading to suicide in the worst-case scenario. As MDD is becoming more prevalent, affecting roughly 300 million individuals worldwide, its treatment has become a major point of interest. Antidepressants acting as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are currently used as the first line of treatment for MDD. Other antidepressants currently used for the treatment of MDD include the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). However, although effective in alleviating symptoms of MDD, most antidepressants require weeks or even months of regular administration prior to eliciting a rational clinical effect. Owing to the strong evidence showing a relationship between neural plasticity, neurogenesis, and MDD, researchers have also looked at the possibility of using treatment modalities that target these processes in an attempt to improve clinical outcome. The overarching aim of this chapter is to highlight the role of neural plasticity and neurogenesis in the pathophysiology of MDD and discuss the most recently studied treatment strategies that target these processes by presenting supporting evidence from both animal and human studies.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Neurogénesis , Plasticidad Neuronal , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Neurogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Plasticidad Neuronal/efectos de los fármacos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/farmacología , Animales , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología
9.
Psychiatr Pol ; 58(3): 449-466, 2024 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217422

RESUMEN

Trazodone is a serotonin antagonist/reuptake inhibitor, approved for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Oral formulations are widely studied and marketed in several countries worldwide while there is little evidence to support use of parenteral formulation. Our narrative review summarizes pharmacological properties and clinical data concerning use of parenteral trazodone in mood disorders. PubMed and Web of Science were used to identify the most relevant literature. The main evidence concerns four studies evaluating efficacy in major depressive disorder and indicates that trazodone was well tolerated and effective. Off-label use in agitation associated with bipolar disorder is also reported in three studies, although prescription of concomitant treatment, as a confounding factor, may have influenced outcome measures. The limited available evidence supports parenteral trazodone use in major depressive disorder and suggests that trazodone is a suitable option in patients at high risk of treatment-emergent mania (TEM).


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Trazodona , Humanos , Trazodona/administración & dosificación , Trazodona/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Humor/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico
12.
J Psychiatr Res ; 178: 298-304, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39180989

RESUMEN

The main hurdles with current therapies for major depressive disorder (MDD) include lack of efficacy, therapeutic latency, and adverse drug reactions. Add-on therapy to conventional antidepressants may result in better therapeutic outcomes to overcome these obstacles. Sarcosine (N-methyl glycine), an endogenous amino acid that acts by modulating the NMDA receptor, is available as a dietary supplement. So, the present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on sarcosine to SSRIs in MDD. In the present randomized, double-blind clinical trial (NCT04975100), 60 eligible participants with MDD were randomly assigned to either the test group (SSRI + sarcosine) or the control group (SSRI + placebo). Clinical and biochemical parameters like MADRS, CGI, serum BDNF, and serum glycine were assessed at baseline and eight weeks. The mean reduction in MADRS score was significant in both the control (-8.7, 95% CI: -11.0 to -6.4, p < 0.001) and the test group (-13.3, 95% CI: -14.9 to -11.7, p < 0.001), but the change in the test group was significantly greater (-4.6, 95% CI: -7.5 to -1.7, p = 0.003). The test group had a significantly higher response rate (p = 0.007) and remission rate (p = 0.038) compared to the control group. There was a significant increase in serum BDNF in both groups; however, the change in the test group was significantly higher than in the control group (p = 0.041). Similarly, the test group had a significantly higher increase in serum glycine than the control group (p < 0.001). Sarcosine may be considered an efficacious and safe add-on therapy to standard SSRIs in the management of MDD. ClinicalTrial.gov IdentifierNCT04975100.


Asunto(s)
Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Quimioterapia Combinada , Sarcosina , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Sarcosina/farmacología , Sarcosina/sangre , Sarcosina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/sangre , Adulto Joven , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/farmacología
13.
J Psychiatr Res ; 178: 359-366, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39197297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid insomnia are often co-prescribed benzodiazepines (BZDs) or Z-drugs as hypnotics with antidepressants to manage persistent insomnia. However, factors associated with their long-term use remain unclear among MDD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 351 MDD patients who started antidepressants with co-prescribed hypnotics (BZDs/Z-drugs) and investigated the prevalence of and factors associated with their long-term use at 12 months. We conducted logistic regression analyses of their long-term use, and compared insomnia severities between the continued and discontinued groups of hypnotics in 32 patients whose insomnia severities had been longitudinally assessed. RESULTS: 66.1% of patients had continued hypnotics for 12 months. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the diazepam-equivalent dose of hypnotics at the start of the combined treatment (>5 mg), the presence of chronic insomnia prior to MDD, and hospitalization correlated with their long-term use (all p < 0.01). We also found the relationship between the insufficient amelioration of insomnia severities and their long-term use. However, confidence in these results is tempered by various factors, including the dependence on hypnotics, the patient's attitude about hypnotic treatment, and the exclusion of subjects treated with other drugs such as sedative antidepressants or antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical indicators may facilitate the selection of treatment strategies for MDD with comorbid insomnia. To avoid the long-term use of hypnotics, their dose at the start of the combined treatment needs to be adequate (≤5 mg) and alternative treatments to BZDs/Z-drugs are required for refractory insomnia.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Comorbilidad , Agonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano
14.
Psychiatry Res ; 340: 116118, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121757

RESUMEN

Vortioxetine is a novel multimodal antidepressant, but its precise efficacy and dose-response relationship for treating different symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) is still unclear. This umbrella review aims to assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and dose-response relationship of vortioxetine across a comprehensive range of clinical features in adults with MDD, including cognition, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and side effects. We meticulously searched eight electronic databases and included systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of vortioxetine. The methodological quality of each included SR was independently assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. To evaluate the credibility of the evidence, we utilized the GRADE framework and the Ioannidis criteria. In total, 35 SRs with 278 MAs met the inclusion criteria and based on these studies we performed 56 MAs of interest. While vortioxetine has been consistently shown to have positive effects on various domains, the evidence regarding cognitive performance and depression symptoms is notably robust compared to placebo, despite of relatively overall low quality of evidence. Finally, a dose-response relationship was observed across all categories within the treatment range of 5-20 mg/d and a dosage of vortioxetine 20 mg/d is recommended for adult MDD patients to achieve full functional recovery.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Vortioxetina , Vortioxetina/farmacología , Vortioxetina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Antidepresivos/farmacología , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Calidad de Vida
15.
Psychiatry Res ; 340: 116125, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39128167

RESUMEN

Intravenous (IV) ketamine and intranasal (IN) esketamine are novel therapies to manage treatment resistant depression within major depressive disorder (MDD-TRD). This is a multi-site observational study aiming to assess the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of these novel therapies in the management of MDD-TRD. 53 patients were referred to receive IV ketamine (n = 26, 69.23 % female, 52.81 ± 14.33 years old) or IN esketamine (n = 27, 51.85 % female, 43.93 ± 13.57 years old). Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) for depression severity and item 10 of the MADRS for suicidal ideation (SI). Tolerability was assessed by systematically tracking side effects and depersonalization using the 6-item Clinician administered dissociative symptom scale (CADSS-6). The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, risk ratio and effect size. Both IV ketamine and IN esketamine significantly reduced depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation by treatment endpoint. Patients receiving IN esketamine, and patients receiving IV ketamine had a similar risk of developing side effects. All side effects reported were mild and transient. These results suggested that both IV ketamine and IN esketamine are effective in the management of depressive symptoms and were well tolerated. Therefore, the results of this study could serve to inform clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intranasal , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Ketamina , Ideación Suicida , Humanos , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/farmacología , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Trials ; 25(1): 560, 2024 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39182140

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant global health burden with available treatments limited by inconsistent efficacy and notable side effects. Classic psychedelics, including lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), have garnered attention for their potential in treating psychiatric disorders. Microdosing, the repeated consumption of sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelics, has emerged as a self-treatment approach for depression within lay communities. Building upon preliminary evidence and the successful completion of an open-label pilot trial of microdosing LSD for depression (LSDDEP1), this protocol outlines a phase 2b randomised controlled trial (LSDDEP2). The main objective of LSDDEP2 is to assess the modification of depressive symptoms, measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), following a regimen of LSD microdoses versus placebo. METHODS: This is a randomised, double-dummy, triple-blind, active placebo-controlled, parallel groups trial of LSD microdosing in patients meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder. Participants will undergo an 8-week LSD microdosing regimen using the titratable MB-22001 formulation taking two doses a week. All doses will be self-administered at home and will be titratable from 4 to 20 µg based on subjective perception and tolerability. In addition to depression symptoms, outcome will include psychiatric and personality inventories, sleep and activity tracking, electroencephalography (EEG), blood biomarkers, semi-structured interviews, and safety (e.g. adverse event, laboratory exam) measures. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first randomised controlled trial to administer controlled microdoses of LSD for treatment of MDD in participants' naturalistic environment. The measures included are designed to assess the drug's safety, mechanism, and treatment efficacy over placebo in this population. The results of this study will be important for assessing the viability of psychedelic microdosing as an additional treatment option and for informing the direction of future clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12624000128594. Prospectively Registered on 13 February 2024.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Alucinógenos , Dietilamida del Ácido Lisérgico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Dietilamida del Ácido Lisérgico/administración & dosificación , Dietilamida del Ácido Lisérgico/efectos adversos , Alucinógenos/administración & dosificación , Alucinógenos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 324, 2024 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107286

RESUMEN

There is insufficient evidence to guide dose and frequency optimization with repeated-dose ketamine for depression. This study assessed the value of symptomatic non-improvement after the first few ketamine infusions as a predictor of overall non-response in depression for early decision-making to discontinue treatment. A total of 135 individuals with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder experiencing a current major depressive episode were administered six repeated doses of intravenous ketamine. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline, 4 h after the first infusion, and 24 h after each infusion. Improvement, partial response, and response were defined as a reduction rate of ≥ 20%, 30%, and 50% in MADRS scores, respectively. This study examined the relationship between improvement (as opposed to non-improvement after each infusion or consecutive non-improvements after the first few infusions) and partial response and response after the sixth infusion. This analysis was summarized using sensitivity, specificity, and other diagnostic test parameters. The sensitivities of improvement at 24 h post-infusion 4 and improvement at 24 h post-infusion 3, vs. three consecutive non-improvements, as predictors for overall partial response and response exceeded 90%. No significant reduction in depressive symptoms was seen in non-improvers following the remaining infusions after the above-identified point. Our study suggests that non-improvement after four infusions, or more conservatively three consecutive non-improvements after three infusions, could serve as a signal of overall non-response to repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for depression and that subsequent treatments would not be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Ketamina , Humanos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infusiones Intravenosas , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico
18.
Actas Esp Psiquiatr ; 52(4): 526-532, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39129680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: By analyzing the current status and influencing factors of medication adherence in adolescent patients with major depressive episode, this study aimed to provide more evidence on clinical medication treatment of such patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 218 adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) admitted to the mental health center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from June 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the study subjects. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ-8) was used to group the patients. All of the patients were collected in accordance with general sociological characteristics and disease characteristics. Conducted χ2 test, t-test, and binary logistic regression analysis. p values less than 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. RESULTS: A total of 218 adolescents with MDD were included in this study. The average score of MAQ-8 was 4.44 ± 2.09, of which 139 (63.76%) with a score less than 6 were included in the medication non-adherence group. Six to eight points with 79 cases (36.24%) were included in the medication compliance group. Family economic status (odds ratio (OR) = 6.211, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.761-13.974), family history (OR = 2.298, 95% CI 1.043-5.062), course of diseases (OR = 2.107, 95% CI 1.002-4.429), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score (OR = 2.303, 95% CI 1.043-5.084), drug side effects (OR = 7.139, 95% CI 3.257-15.647), attitude to treatment (OR = 2.583, 95% CI 1.221-5.466), and satisfaction with doctors (OR = 2.338, 95% CI 1.08-5.064) were the effect of medication adherence. CONCLUSION: Severe depression of adolescent patients with poor medication compliance, as well as influencing factors, including family economic conditions, family history, course of diseases, BDI score, and drug side effects, were clinically investigated to formulate corresponding measures and improve patients' medication adherence.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 327, 2024 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122686

RESUMEN

Ketamine has gained attention for its effective treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and suicidal ideation; Despite numerous studies presenting the rapid efficacy, long-term benefit in real-world populations remains poorly characterized. This is a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a platform aggregating electronic health records (EHRs) data from 108 million patients from 62 health care organizations in the US, and the study population includes 514,988 patients with a diagnosis of recurrent MDD who were prescribed relevant treatment in their EHRs. The prescription of ketamine was associated with significantly decreased risk of suicidal ideation compared to the prescription of other common antidepressants: HR = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.53-0.76) at 1 day - 7 days, 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59-0.77) at 1 day - 30 days, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.77) at 1 day - 90 days, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67-0.81) at 1 day - 180 days, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83) at 1 day - 270 days. This trend was especially robust among adults over 24 years of age, females, males, and White patients with recurrent MDD. This study provides real-world evidence that ketamine has long-term benefits in mitigating suicidal ideation in patients with recurrent MDD. Future work should focus on optimizing dosage regimens for ketamine, understanding the mechanism, and the difference in various demographic subpopulations.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Ketamina , Recurrencia , Ideación Suicida , Humanos , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Adolescente
20.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e56960, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163592

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common worldwide and can be highly disabling. People with MDD face many barriers to treatment and may not experience full symptom relief even when treated. Therefore, new treatment modalities are needed for MDD. Digital therapeutics (DTx) may provide people with MDD an additional treatment option. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe a phase 3 remote, multicenter, randomized, masked, sham-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a smartphone app-based DTx (CT-152) in adult participants diagnosed with MDD, used as an adjunct to antidepressant therapy (ADT). METHODS: Participants aged 22-64 years with a current primary diagnosis of MDD and an inadequate response to ADT were included. Participants were randomized 1:1 to CT-152 or a sham DTx. CT-152 is a smartphone app-based DTx that delivers a cognitive-emotional and behavioral therapeutic intervention. The core components of CT-152 are the Emotional Faces Memory Task exercises, brief lessons to learn and apply key therapeutic skills, and SMS text messaging to reinforce lessons and encourage engagement with the app. The sham DTx is a digital working memory exercise with emotionally neutral stimuli designed to match CT-152 for time and attention. Participants took part in the trial for up to 13 weeks. The trial included a screening period of up to 3 weeks, a treatment period of 6 weeks, and an extension period of 4 weeks to assess the durability of the effect. Sites and participants had the option of an in-person or remote screening visit; the remaining trial visits were remote. Efficacy was evaluated using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. The durability of the effect was evaluated with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale. Adverse events were also assessed. Satisfaction, measured by the Participant and Healthcare Professional Satisfaction Scales, and health status, measured by the EQ-5D-5L, were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: This study was initiated in February 2021 and had a primary completion date in October 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the methodological design for the first evaluation of CT-152 as an adjunct to ADT. This study protocol is methodologically robust and incorporates many aspects of conventional pivotal pharmaceutical phase 3 trial design, such as randomization and safety end points. Novel considerations included the use of a sham comparator, masking considerations for visible app content, and outcome measures relevant to DTx. The rigor of this methodology will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of CT-152. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04770285; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04770285. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/56960.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Aplicaciones Móviles , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA