RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to introduce our modified hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HARPLDN) technique and define the learning curve. METHODS: One hundred thirty-eight kidney donors who underwent modified HARPLDN by the same surgeon between May 2015 and March 2022 were included. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curve analysis was performed with the total operation time as the study outcome. RESULTS: In total, the mean operative time was 138.2 ± 32.1 min. The median warm ischemic time (WIT) and estimated blood loss were 90 s and 50 ml, respectively. The learning curve for the total operative time was best modeled as a second-order polynomial with the following equation: CUSUMOT (min) = (-0.09 case number2) + (12.88 case number) - 67.77 (R2 = 0.7875; p<0.05). The CUSUM learning curve included the following three unique phases: phase 1 (the initial 41 cases), representing the initial learning curve; phase 2 (the middle 43 cases), representing expert competence; and phase 3 (the final 54 cases), representing mastery. The overall 6-month graft survival rate was 99.3%, with 94.9% immediate onset of graft function without delayed graft function and 0.7% ureteral complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified method is safe and effective for living donor nephrectomy and has the advantages of a shorter operating time and optimized WIT. The surgeon can become familiar with the modified HARPLDN after 41 cases and effectively perform the next 97 cases.
Asunto(s)
Curva de Aprendizaje , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida/métodos , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Riñón/educación , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/educaciónRESUMEN
We recently reported in a rat model of kidney transplantation that the addition of sodium thiosulfate (STS) to organ preservation solution improved renal graft quality and prolonged recipient survival. The present study investigates whether STS pre-treatment would produce a similar effect. In vitro, rat kidney epithelial cells were treated with 150 µM STS before and/or during exposure to hypoxia followed by reoxygenation. In vivo, donor rats were treated with PBS or 2.4 mg/kg STS 30 min before donor kidneys were procured and stored in UW or UW+150 µM STS solution at 4 °C for 24 h. Renal grafts were then transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomised recipient rats which were then sacrificed on post-operative day 3. STS pre-treatment significantly reduced cell death compared to untreated and other treated cells in vitro (p < 0.05), which corresponded with our in vivo result (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in other parameters of tissue injury. Our results suggest that STS pre-treatment may improve renal graft function after transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón , Daño por Reperfusión , Tiosulfatos , Animales , Tiosulfatos/farmacología , Tiosulfatos/uso terapéutico , Daño por Reperfusión/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Ratas , Masculino , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Soluciones Preservantes de Órganos/farmacología , Preservación de Órganos/métodosRESUMEN
Transplantation remains the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease but is critically limited by the number of available organs. Xenografts from genetically modified pigs have become a promising solution to the loss of life while waiting for transplantation. However, the current clinical model for xenotransplantation will require off-site procurement, leading to a period of ischemia during transportation. As of today, there is limited understanding regarding the preservation of these organs, including the duration of viability, and the associated molecular changes. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the effects of static cold storage (SCS) on α1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GGTA1 KO) kidney. After SCS, viability was further assessed using acellular sub-normothermic ex vivo perfusion and simulated transplantation with human blood. Compared to baseline, tubular and glomerular interstitium was preserved after 2 days of SCS in both WT and GGTA1 KO kidneys. Bulk RNA-sequencing demonstrated that only eight genes were differentially expressed after SCS in GGTA1 KO kidneys. During sub-normothermic perfusion, kidney function, reflected by oxygen consumption, urine output, and lactate production was adequate in GGTA1 KO grafts. During a simulated transplant with human blood, macroscopic and histological assessment revealed minimal kidney injury. However, GGTA1 KO kidneys exhibited higher arterial resistance, increased lactate production, and reduced oxygen consumption during the simulated transplant. In summary, our study suggests that SCS is feasible for the preservation of porcine GGTA1 KO kidneys. However, alternative preservation methods should be evaluated for extended preservation of porcine grafts.
Asunto(s)
Galactosiltransferasas , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón , Preservación de Órganos , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Galactosiltransferasas/genética , Galactosiltransferasas/deficiencia , Porcinos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Humanos , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Perfusión/métodos , Xenoinjertos , Criopreservación/métodos , Técnicas de Inactivación de Genes/métodos , RatonesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Situs inversus totalis is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by a mirror-image orientation of abdominal, and in some cases, thoracic organs. Here, we report our situs inversus totalis transplantation experience and further review liver transplantations in adult recipients and donors with situs inversus totalis. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe three cases with situs inversus totalis. The first case was liver transplantation in a recipient (a 61-year-old Iranian man) with situs inversus totalis, the second was a liver transplantation from a donor (a 52-year-old Iranian woman) with situs inversus totalis, and finally, for the first time, a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in a recipient (a 26-year-old Iranian man) with situs inversus totalis. In patient one, hepatectomy could be performed according to the standard method and on the basis of preoperative studies. Hepatic vein and arterial anastomosis were performed as in every other patient without situs inversus totalis. To prevent biliary complications, a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed. In patient two, implantation time, suprahepatic vein, portal vein, arterial, and biliary reconstruction could be done as in any other case without situs inversus totalis. Plication of the right-sided diaphragm and fixation of the falciform ligament was done for our patient. In patient three, systemic drainage was preferred to portal flow for establishing the outflow drainage of the pancreas compared with otherwise normal patients. CONCLUSION: Although situs inversus totalis is a rare condition, our reported techniques are suitable, considering advantages such as easier accessibility, more acceptable placement of the implanted organs regarding vascular variations, and the appropriate location of the allograft in the proximity of other organs.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Trasplante de Páncreas , Situs Inversus , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Situs Inversus/complicaciones , Situs Inversus/cirugía , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinically relevant anti-CD40 antibody iscalimab for baseline immunosuppression in a preclinical pig-to-rhesus renal xenograft model. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: CD40/CD40L co-stimulation blockade-based immunosuppression has been more successful than calcineurin-based protocols in prolonging xenograft survival in preclinical models. METHODS: GGTA1 knockout/CD55 transgenic pig kidneys were transplanted into rhesus monkeys (n = 6) receiving an iscalimab-based immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: Two grafts were lost early (22 and 26 days) because of ectatic donor ureters with otherwise normal histology. The other recipients survived 171, 315, 422, and 439 days with good renal function throughout the posttransplant course. None of the recipients experienced serious infectious morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: It may be reasonable to evaluate an iscalimab-based immunosuppressive regimen in clinical renal xenotransplantation.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Xenoinjertos , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón , Macaca mulatta , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Porcinos , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Xenoinjertos/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Humanos , Galactosiltransferasas/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of multigene-modified donor pigs for xenotransplantation is increasing with the advent of gene-editing technologies. However, it remains unclear which gene combination is suitable for specific organ transplantation. METHODS: In this study, we utilized CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology, piggyBac transposon system, and somatic cell cloning to construct GTKO/hCD55/hTBM/hCD39 four-gene-edited cloned (GEC) pigs and performed kidney transplantation from pig to rhesus monkey to evaluate the effectiveness of these GEC pigs. RESULTS: First, 107 cell colonies were obtained through drug selection, of which seven were 4-GE colonies. Two colonies were selected for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), resulting in seven fetuses, of which four were GGTA1 biallelic knockout. Out of these four, two fetuses had higher expression of hCD55, hTBM, and hCD39. Therefore, these two fetuses were selected for two consecutive rounds of cloning, resulting in 97 live piglets. After phenotype identification, the GGTA1 gene of these pigs was inactivated, and hCD55, hTBM, and hCD39 were expressed in cells and multiple tissues. Furthermore, the numbers of monkey IgM and IgG binding to the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of the 4-GEC pigs were markedly reduced. Moreover, 4-GEC porcine PBMCs had greater survival rates than those from wild-type pigs through complement-mediated cytolysis assays. In pig-to-monkey kidney xenotransplantation, the kidney xenograft successfully survived for 11 days. All physiological and biochemical indicators were normal, and no hyperacute rejection or coagulation abnormalities were found after transplantation. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the GTKO/hCD55/hTBM/hCD39 four-gene modification effectively alleviates immune rejection, and the pig kidney can functionally support the recipient monkey's life.
Asunto(s)
Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Galactosiltransferasas , Edición Génica , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Porcinos , Edición Génica/métodos , Galactosiltransferasas/genética , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Macaca mulatta , Técnicas de Transferencia Nuclear , Xenoinjertos , Humanos , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Apirasa , Antígenos CDRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aims of this narrative review were (i) to describe the current indications of SLKT, (ii) to report evolution of SLKT activity, (iii) to report the outcomes of SLKT, (iv) to explain the immune-protective effect of liver transplant on kidney transplant, (v) to explain the interest of delay kidney transplantation, using hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), (vi) to report kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) indications and (vii) to describe the value of the increase in the use of extended criteria donors (ECD) and particular controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) transplant, thanks to the development of new organ preservation strategies. METHOD: Electronic databases were screened using the keywords "Simultaneous", "Combined", "kidney transplantation" and "liver transplantation". The methodological and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies meant that meta-analysis was inappropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1,917 publications were identified in the literature search. Two reviewers screened all study abstracts independently and 1,107 of these were excluded. Thus, a total of 79 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 21 were excluded. In total, 58 studies were included in this systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation has made a significant contribution for patients with dual-organ disease. The optimization of indication and selection of SLKT patients will reduce futile transplantation. Moreover, increasing the use of transplants from extended criteria donors, in particular cDCD, should be encouraged, thanks to the development of new modalities of organ preservation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Hígado , Preservación de Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Predicción , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
On 24 January 2023, Eurotransplant has introduced the virtual crossmatch for kidney and pancreas allocation as a better alternative for the physical Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches at the donor centre, which were associated with a longer cold ischaemia time and false positive reactions. For the time being, the physical CDC crossmatch at the recipient centre will remain in place as the final histocompatibility check. While Eurotransplant is certainly not the first organ allocation organisation to introduce virtual crossmatching, several novel aspects have been introduced, such as calculation of the virtual panel reactive antibody (vPRA) on 11 loci at the second-field level in addition to the serological broad and split level, electronic HLA typing data transmission using Histoimmunogenetics Markup Language (HML) file format, and the actual virtual crossmatch based on ambiguous, second-field HLA typing of the donor on all 11 loci. This short communication will focus on these novel aspects of the virtual crossmatch in Eurotransplant.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Trasplante de Riñón , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/genética , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Isoanticuerpos/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have systematically explored the factors influencing the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. To investigate the relationship between the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and postoperative complications of the donor as well as the recipient, and then build a model for predicting the difficulty of surgery. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy by the same surgeon from September 2022 to March 2024 were included as the modeling group. 20 patients operated on by another surgeon served as the external validation group. The subjective score (1-3 points) of surgical difficulty was used as the quantitative index of surgical difficulty. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were used to explore the correlation between preoperative data and surgical difficulty scores of kidney donors, and finally built a prediction model through multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: With the increase in the difficulty of operation, both donors and recipients' complications were increased. Linear regression analysis showed that only the number of renal arteries, visceral fat thickness and MAP score were independent risk factors for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. The prediction equation is as follows: Difficulty score = 0.584*Number of renal arteries + 0.731*MAP score + 0.110*visceral fat thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Donors with higher surgical difficulty are more likely to have serious complications after surgery as well as the recipient. We also established a reliable prediction model for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida/métodos , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The authors describe a kidney transplant procedure using a living donor with a large cyst and double arteries. Due to the lack of regular transplant activity from a deceased donors, we decided to use the, so called, expanded criteria living donors, which means older age (more than 65 years), hypertension, some structural anomalies of the kidneys (cysts, multiple renal arteries), ABO incompatible kidney transplant, etc. The surgical procedure was the unroofing of a large cyst and wadding with perirenal fat. The 10 years survival rate is quite successful and we can recommend it.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Arteria Renal , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Arteria Renal/anomalías , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/cirugía , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Significant progress has been made in kidney xenotransplantation in the past few years, and this field is accelerating towards clinical translation. Therefore, surveillance of the xenograft with appropriate tools is of great importance. Ultrasonography has been widely used in kidney allotransplantation and served as an economical and non-invasive method to monitor the allograft. However, questions remain whether the ultrasonographic criteria established for human kidney allograft could also be applied in xenotransplantation. METHODS: In the current study, we established a porcine-rhesus life sustaining kidney xenotransplantation model. The xenograft underwent intensive surveillance using gray-scale, colorful Doppler ultrasound as well as 2D shear wave elastography. The kidney growth, blood perfusion, and cortical stiffness were measured twice a day. These parameters were compared with the clinical data including urine output, chemistry, and pathological findings. RESULTS: The observation continued for 16 days after transplantation. Decline of urine output and elevated serum creatinine were observed on POD9 and biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection was seen on the same day. The xenograft underwent substantial growth, with the long axis length increased by 32% and the volume increased by threefold at the end of observation. The resistive index of the xenograft arteries elevated in response to rejection, together with impaired cortical perfusion, while the peak systolic velocity (PSV) was not compromised. The cortical stiffness also increased along with rejection. CONCLUSION: In summary, the ultrasound findings of kidney xenograft shared similarities with those in allograft but possessed some unique features. A modified criteria needs to be established for further application of ultrasound in kidney xenotransplantation.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Xenoinjertos , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón , Macaca mulatta , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Porcinos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
This study evaluated the current practices of selecting cold storage preservation solutions in Brazil and their impact on delayed graft function (DGF) incidence and 1-year outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 3,134 brain-dead deceased donor kidney transplants performed between 2014 and 2015 in 18 Brazilian centers. The most commonly used preservation solution was Euro-collins (EC, 55.4%), followed by Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK, 30%) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1, 14.6%). The incidence of DGF was 54.4%, with 11.7% of patients requiring dialysis for more than 14 days, indicating prolonged DGF. Upon adjusting for confounding variables, HTK demonstrated a significantly lower risk of DGF than EC (OR 0.7350.82500.926), as did IGL-1 (OR 0.6050.7120.837). Similar protective effects were observed for prolonged DGF when comparing HTK (OR 0.4780.5990.749) and IGL-1 (OR 0.4780.6810.749) against EC. No significant association was found between preservation solutions and 1-year death-censored graft survival. In conclusion, EC was the most frequently used cold storage perfusion solution, demonstrating a higher incidence and duration of DGF compared with HTK and IGL-1, but with no impact on 1-year graft survival.
Asunto(s)
Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Soluciones Preservantes de Órganos , Preservación de Órganos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/epidemiología , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The left kidney is often preferred for living donor kidney transplantation because of its anatomical advantages. However, the right kidney may be procured due to donor conditions. Few studies have assessed the safety and graft outcome of right retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes between right and left RDN with respect to donor outcome and the graft function of recipients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 230 consecutive living donor kidney transplants performed at our institution between May 2019 and March 2023. We reviewed the outcomes of kidney transplant in the right and left kidneys after RDN. RESULTS: A total of 230 living donor kidney transplants were performed, with 32 donors receiving right RDN (right RDN group) and 198 donors receiving left RDN (left RDN group). The renal veins and ureters were significantly shorter in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (both p < .001). Donor operation and warm ischemia time were significantly longer in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (p = .012 and p < .001, respectively). None of the groups exhibited any cases of delayed graft function owing to donor-related reasons. Perioperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of recipients and death-censored graft survival were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In RDN, the outcomes of right donor nephrectomy were comparable to those of left donor nephrectomy in terms of donor safety and recipient renal function.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Laparoscopía , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Supervivencia de Injerto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for kidney failure. Donation, transport and transplant of kidney grafts leads to significant ischaemia reperfusion injury. Static cold storage (SCS), whereby the kidney is stored on ice after removal from the donor until the time of implantation, represents the simplest preservation method. However, technology is now available to perfuse or "pump" the kidney during the transport phase ("continuous") or at the recipient centre ("end-ischaemic"). This can be done at a variety of temperatures and using different perfusates. The effectiveness of these treatments manifests as improved kidney function post-transplant. OBJECTIVES: To compare machine perfusion (MP) technologies (hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) and (sub) normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)) with each other and with standard SCS. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies until 15 June 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing machine perfusion techniques with each other or versus SCS for deceased donor kidney transplantation were eligible for inclusion. All donor types were included (donor after circulatory death (DCD) and brainstem death (DBD), standard and extended/expanded criteria donors). Both paired and unpaired studies were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The results of the literature search were screened, and a standard data extraction form was used to collect data. Both of these steps were performed by two independent authors. Dichotomous outcome results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Survival analyses (time-to-event) were performed with the generic inverse variance meta-analysis of hazard ratios (HR). Continuous scales of measurement were expressed as a mean difference (MD). Random effects models were used for data analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary outcomes included graft survival, incidence of primary non-function (PNF), DGF duration, economic implications, graft function, patient survival and incidence of acute rejection. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (4007 participants) were included. The risk of bias was generally low across all studies and bias domains. The majority of the evidence compared non-oxygenated HMP with standard SCS (19 studies). The use of non-oxygenated HMP reduces the rate of DGF compared to SCS (16 studies, 3078 participants: RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88; P < 0.0001; I2 = 31%; high certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis revealed that continuous (from donor hospital to implanting centre) HMP reduces DGF (high certainty evidence). In contrast, this benefit over SCS was not seen when non-oxygenated HMP was not performed continuously (low certainty evidence). Non-oxygenated HMP reduces DGF in both DCD and DBD settings in studies performed in the 'modern era' and when cold ischaemia times (CIT) were short. The number of perfusions required to prevent one episode of DGF was 7.69 and 12.5 in DCD and DBD grafts, respectively. Continuous non-oxygenated HMP versus SCS also improves one-year graft survival (3 studies, 1056 participants: HR 0.46, 0.29 to 0.75; P = 0.002; I2 = 0%; high certainty evidence). Assessing graft survival at maximal follow-up confirmed a benefit of continuous non-oxygenated HMP over SCS (4 studies, 1124 participants (follow-up 1 to 10 years): HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.77; P = 0.0005; I2 = 0%; high certainty evidence). This effect was not seen in studies where HMP was not continuous. The effect of non-oxygenated HMP on our other outcomes (PNF, incidence of acute rejection, patient survival, hospital stay, long-term graft function, duration of DGF) remains uncertain. Studies performing economic analyses suggest that HMP is either cost-saving (USA and European settings) or cost-effective (Brazil). One study investigated continuous oxygenated HMP versus non-oxygenated HMP (low risk of bias in all domains); the simple addition of oxygen during continuous HMP leads to additional benefits over non-oxygenated HMP in DCD donors (> 50 years), including further improvements in graft survival, improved one-year kidney function, and reduced acute rejection. One large, high-quality study investigated end-ischaemic oxygenated HMP versus SCS and found end-ischaemic oxygenated HMP (median machine perfusion time 4.6 hours) demonstrated no benefit compared to SCS. The impact of longer periods of end-ischaemic HMP is unknown. One study investigated NMP versus SCS (low risk of bias in all domains). One hour of end ischaemic NMP did not improve DGF compared with SCS alone. An indirect comparison revealed that continuous non-oxygenated HMP (the most studied intervention) was associated with improved graft survival compared with end-ischaemic NMP (indirect HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.92; P = 0.03). No studies investigated normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) or included any donors undergoing NRP. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Continuous non-oxygenated HMP is superior to SCS in deceased donor kidney transplantation, reducing DGF, improving graft survival and proving cost-effective. This is true for both DBD and DCD kidneys, both short and long CITs, and remains true in the modern era (studies performed after 2008). In DCD donors (> 50 years), the simple addition of oxygen to continuous HMP further improves graft survival, kidney function and acute rejection rate compared to non-oxygenated HMP. Timing of HMP is important, and benefits have not been demonstrated with short periods (median 4.6 hours) of end-ischaemic HMP. End-ischaemic NMP (one hour) does not confer meaningful benefits over SCS alone and is inferior to continuous HMP in an indirect comparison of graft survival. Further studies assessing NMP for viability assessment and therapeutic delivery are warranted and in progress.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Preservación de Órganos , Perfusión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Frío , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/prevención & control , Riñón , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Perfusión/instrumentación , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Temperatura , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is associated with less tissue manipulation and earlier recovery with minimal incision. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) and open mini-incision donor nephrectomy (ODN). METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, 141 cases involving RDN were analysed. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 191 patients who underwent ODN from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, operation factors, perioperative outcomes, and complications were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The RDN group presented with less blood loss than the ODN group (p = 0.023). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RDN group than in the ODN group (p < 0.005). The overall rate of complications was low and there was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: The robotic approach has benefits over the traditional open approach, including shorter length of hospital stay and reduced intraoperative blood loss.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Tiempo de Internación , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The research aimed to assess the effectiveness of inside-out anterior quadratus lumborum (QL3) block and local wound infiltration in managing postoperative pain and total morphine dosage following kidney transplantation. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study; 46 end-stage renal disease patients undergoing kidney transplantation were randomly allocated into 2 groups: a QL group (nâ =â 23) receiving 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine using the ultrasound-assisted inside-out technique before wound closure, while the local wound infiltration (LA) group (nâ =â 23) receiving the same dose around the surgical wound and drain at the time of skin closure. The primary outcome measure was the numerical pain rating scale, with secondary outcomes including amount of morphine consumption at various postoperative time points (2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th hours). RESULTS: Patients in the QL group had significantly lower numerical rating scale scores at the 2nd and 4th hours, both at rest and during movement (Pâ <â .05). Although pain scores at rest and during movement at later time points were lower in the QL group compared to the LA group, these differences were not statistically significant. Cumulative morphine consumption at postoperative 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th hours was significantly lower in the QL group (Pâ <â .05). No patients experienced complications from the QL3 block. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-assisted inside-out QL3 block significantly reduced postoperative pain levels at the 2nd and 4th hours, both at rest and during movement, and led to a reduction in cumulative morphine consumption from the 4th hour postoperatively, and persisting throughout the 24-hour period.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Anestésicos Locales , Trasplante de Riñón , Morfina , Bloqueo Nervioso , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Masculino , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Dimensión del Dolor , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosAsunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Masculino , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Femenino , Pronóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Supervivencia de Injerto , HieloRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Donor nephrectomy (DN) is a unique surgical procedure in urological practice, as it involves exposing a healthy individual to the potential risks of surgery. This type of surgery exhibits heterogeneity in terms of approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), each with its unique set of advantages and disadvantages. Consequently, there is currently a lack of universally agreed upon clear guidelines. In these settings, this study aims to evaluate transplantation surgeons' knowledge through a real-life survey and compare it with data from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The study is divided into two parts, with the first part focusing on the outcomes of the real-life survey designed to assess surgeons' knowledge about different DN approaches and their real-world practices during the surgery. The second part involves a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, specifically examining the outcomes of different surgical approaches to DN. The systematic review followed the PRISMA Guidelines and involved a search of PubMed and Web of Science for RCTs comparing the outcomes of different DN approaches. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. The random effect model was mainly used to assess the mean difference of the included studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022 and surveyed 50 surgeons, of which 35 participants (70%) completed the survey. Regarding various approaches to DN, 97.14% of surgeons reported having experience with live DN, and 45.72% performed over 15 cases per year. The most performed approach was pure laparoscopic DN (68.57%). Pure laparoscopic DN was the preferred approach for 77.42% of respondents. The review process resulted in 335 articles, of which 35 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. In summary, most studies found that laparoscopic approaches, including standard, hand-assisted, LESS-DN, and mini-LDN, resulted in less postoperative pain, better cosmetic, and quicker recovery times compared to open approaches. The main limitation of the current study is the heterogeneity of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides valuable insights into the practices of renal transplantation surgeons, offering a comprehensive comparison to level 1 studies (RCTs) in the field. It underscores the continued significance of ODN in contemporary practice, particularly in light of recommendations from the EAU guidelines on renal transplantation. This reaffirms the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches, including factors such as cost, postoperative pain, and cosmetic outcomes. While robotic-assisted DN holds promise, their adoption remains variable, potentially due to limited robust evidence.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Nefrectomía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Donadores Vivos , Urólogos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Laparoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of concrete evidence regarding the best approach for donor nephrectomy among transplant centers. We compared donor outcomes during the period of the transition from the hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy method to the purely laparoscopic donor nephrectomy method and have provided suggestions to minimize the initial difficulties and to improve donor outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Details (operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, creatinine at hospital discharge, and creatinine at the 1-month follow-up) were compared between the 32 hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy cases and 16 purely laparoscopic donor nephrectomy cases. All parti-cipants were living donors and were first-degree or second-degree relatives of the recipients. RESULTS: We did not establish superiority of the hand-assisted procedure with regard to all factors except operative time, which we attributed to the challenging learning curve of the laparoscopic method. The laparoscopic method was also associated with a less lengthy hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both the hand-assisted technique and the laparoscopic technique are safe and effective methods for kidney procurement for transplant. Centers seeking to transition from the first to the second technique can do so smoothly by careful selection of donors and implementation of stepwise changes in both the operative techniques and the postoperative patient treatment.