RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are surgical treatments for pathology of the proximal tendon of the long head of the biceps. There is debate over which procedure provides better patient outcomes. PURPOSE: Compare patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction between biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing arthroscopic biceps tenodesis or tenotomy as part of more extensive shoulder surgery with a single surgeon. Concomitant procedures included rotator cuff repair, subacromial decompression, acromioclavicular joint resection, and debridement. Patients 36-81 years old were contacted by phone at > 2-year post-operatively to complete a biceps-specific outcome questionnaire. Subject decision not to participate was the sole exclusion criterion. Satisfaction scores and frequencies of potential biceps-related downsides (biceps cramping/spasms, biceps pain, shoulder pain, weakness, cosmetic deformity) were analyzed for the effects of procedure, sex, and age. RESULTS: Satisfaction score distributions were similar between patients with tenodesis and patients with tenotomy (χ2 = 8.34, P = 0.08), although slightly more patients with tenodesis than patients with tenotomy reported being satisfied or very satisfied (96% versus 91%). Perceived downsides occurred more frequently among patients with tenotomy than in patients with tenodesis: 59% of patients with tenotomy reported ≥ 1 downside, versus 37% of patients with tenodesis (P < 0.01). In patients reporting ≥ 1 downside, distributions of total downsides differed between procedures (χ2 = 10.04, P = 0.04): patients with tenotomy were more likely to report multiple concurrent downsides than were patients with tenodesis (31% versus 16%). Each individual downside tended to be reported as present by a greater proportion of patients with tenotomy than patients with tenodesis. Sex had no effect on satisfaction or downsides, but there was a trend for older patients to report higher satisfaction and fewer downsides. CONCLUSIONS: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are both viable treatments for proximal biceps tendon pathology, yielding high patient satisfaction. There were trends toward greater satisfaction and fewer problems in patients with tenodesis. Still, younger patients with tenodesis did report perceived downsides. Alternatively, older patients tended to be more satisfied with both procedures overall. Regardless of procedure, most patients receiving either tenotomy or tenodesis would undergo their respective surgery again. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III evidence, retrospective comparative cohort study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) tear was introduced as an International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis in 1994, awareness, diagnosis, and surgical treatment of this disorder has increased. Here, we aim to clarify trends in the frequency of SLAP tear diagnosis and arthroscopic SLAP repair surgery in the United States. METHODS: Using private insurance claims from 2003 to 2013 in MarketScan (approximately 55 million Americans), we identified patients with SLAP tear diagnosis or arthroscopic SLAP repair surgery. Population-based rates of SLAP diagnosis and related shoulder procedures were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 329,643 patients in the MarketScan database received a SLAP tear diagnosis. In all, 62.8% underwent some form of shoulder surgery after diagnosis. SLAP diagnosis increased from 28.0 per 100,000 in 2003 to 142.4 per 100,000 in 2013 (p < 0.0001); the rate of shoulder surgery in these patients increased from 20.1 per 100,000 in 2003 to 74.1 per 100,000 in 2013 (p < 0.0001). However, the percentage of patients with SLAP tears who got shoulder surgery decreased (p < 0.0001). In 2003, almost no patient got biceps tenodesis for SLAP tears; by 2013, 18.1% of surgeries for SLAP tear were biceps tenodesis. Isolated arthroscopic SLAP repairs peaked in 2009 at 28.4 per 100,000 and stabilized thereafter. CONCLUSION: We confirmed prior reports that SLAP diagnosis increased from 2003 to 2013, although the percentage of these patients who underwent surgery decreased over this period. Arthroscopic SLAP repair doubled but then plateaued after 2009. Biceps tenodesis now accounts for a substantial portion of surgeries for SLAP tear. This may reflect an improved understanding of superior labrum anatomy and biomechanics.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Labral repair and biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are routine operations for type II superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesion of the shoulder, but evidence of their superiority is lacking. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair versus biceps tenotomy and tenodesis intervention. METHODS: The eight studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CNKI, and Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan 5.3. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Eight studies including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six observational studies were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from low to moderate. The pooled results of UCLA score, SST score, and complications showed that the differences were not statistically significant between the two interventions. The difference of ASES score and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between arthroscopic repair and biceps tenotomy and tenodesis intervention, and arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and tenodesis treatment was more effective. Sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results, and there were too less included articles to verify the publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Both arthroscopic repair and biceps tenotomy and tenodesis interventions had benefits in type II SLAP lesions. Arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and tenodesis treatment provides better clinical outcome in ASES score and satisfaction rate and comparable complications compared with arthroscopic repair treatment. In view of the heterogeneity and confounding factors, whether these conclusions are applicable should be further determined in future studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Regarding surgical strategy for upper limb functional rehabilitation in patients with traumatic tetraplegia, there are few publications and the case series are quite small. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We reviewed all traumatic quadriplegic patients, operated one by one surgeon, professor Marc Revol, for functional surgery of the upper limb in the same department from 1989 to 2018. For each patient, we recorded their gender, their group according to the international classification, their age at the time of the first surgical procedure, the length of time between the accident and the first surgery and between two procedures, the average duration of the whole surgical program, and the surgical technique used for the elbow, the wrist, the long fingers and the thumb. RESULTS: We reviewed 158 cases, representing 428 surgical procedures. Some surgical principles have remained unchanged through the years: the hand opening stage comes before the closing one, and systematically includes intrinsic active palliative procedures using lassos; and restoration of long fingers grasping is consistently associated with restoration of thumb gripping and with flexor tendons tenolysis in the lassos region. Other strategic points have evolved over time: restoration of active elbow extension now systematically uses the biceps over the deltoid transfer; brachio radialis (BR) to extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) transfer has been replaced by tenodesis; in groups 2, 3, 4 and 5, the hand opening stage has been consistently associated with the biceps transfer, thus shortening the surgical program to two procedures instead of three for each upper limb; split distal flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tenodesis has replaced thumb arthrodesis; and, whenever it was possible, BR has been spared from group 3 and beyond. CONCLUSION: In groups 2 to 5, the indications have evolved towards the following strategy. The first surgical step includes restoration of elbow extension using biceps transfer and hand opening reinforcement through four lassos, one split distal FPL tenodesis for the thumb, and EDC and EPL tenodesis to the retinaculum. The second surgical procedure consists of restoration of long fingers and thumb flexion using one unique motor (BR or extensor carpi radialis longus), and closed tenolysis of the flexor tendons in case of adhesions in the lassos area.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in SLAP repairs over time, including patient age, and percentage of SLAP repairs versus other common shoulder arthroscopic procedures. METHODS: The records of 4 sports or shoulder/elbow fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons were used to identify the total number of common shoulder arthroscopic cases performed between 2004 and 2014 using current procedural terminology codes (CPT): 29822, 29823, 29826, 29827, 29806, 29807, 29825, and 29828. The number of SLAP repairs (CPT code 29807) as a combined or isolated procedure were recorded, and the classification of SLAP type was undertaken using operative reports. Patient age was recorded. Linear regression was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 9,765 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder procedures using the defined CPT codes between 2004 and 2014 by our 4 orthopaedic surgeons. Of these, 619 underwent a SLAP repair (6.3%); average age 31.2 ± 11.9. The age of patients undergoing SLAP repair significantly decreased over time (P < .001, R(2) = 0.794). Most SLAP repairs were performed on type II SLAP tears (P = .015, R(2) = 0.503). The percentage of SLAP repairs compared with the total number of shoulder arthroscopic surgeries and total number of patients who underwent SLAP repair significantly decreased over time (P < .001, R(2) = 0.832 and P = .002, R(2) = 0.674, respectively). Conversely, the number and percentage of biceps tenodeses are increasing over time (P = .0024 and P = .0099, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 10 years, the total number of biceps tenodeses has increased, whereas the number and relative percentage of SLAP repairs within our practice have decreased. The average age of patients undergoing SLAP repair is decreasing, and most SLAP repairs are performed for type II SLAP tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current studies investigating surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon tears largely consist of small, retrospective case series. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current patient demographics, surgical trends, and postoperative complication rates associated with operative treatment of distal biceps tendon tears using a large database of privately insured, non-Medicare patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical intervention for distal biceps tendon tears from 2007 to 2011 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Demographic and surgical data as well as postoperative complications were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression analysis and χ(2) tests, with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 1443 patients underwent surgical treatment for distal biceps tendon tears. Men and patients aged 40 to 59 years accounted for 98% and 72% of the cohort, respectively. Regarding surgical technique, reinsertion to the radial tuberosity was preferred (95%) over tenodesis to the brachialis (5%) (P < .01). In total, revision surgery for tendon rerupture occurred in 5.4% of treated patients. The incidence of revision surgery for rerupture in acute and chronic distal biceps tears was 5.1% and 7.0%, respectively (P = .36). Postoperative infection and peripheral nerve injury rates were 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgeons strongly preferred anatomic reinsertion to the radial tuberosity for treatment, regardless of the chronicity of the injury. Postoperative complication rates were similar to those found in prior studies, although the true rate of rerupture may be higher than previously thought.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon has become a popular surgical treatment option for patients with pain or instability attributed to a diseased or unstable biceps tendon. No previous studies have characterized the practice patterns of surgeons performing biceps tenodesis in the United States. PURPOSE: To investigate current trends in both arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis across time, sex, age, and region of the United States as well as associated charges. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Patients who underwent biceps tenodesis (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 23430 and 29828) for the years 2008 through 2011 were identified using the PearlDiver Patient Record Database, including both private-payer and Medicare data. These cohorts were then assessed for associated diagnoses using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes and concomitant procedures using CPT codes. These searches yielded procedural volumes, sex and age distribution, regional volumes, and average per-patient charges. A χ(2) linear-by-linear association analysis, Student t test, and linear regression were used for comparisons, with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 44,932 biceps tenodesis procedures were identified from 2008-2011. The incidence of biceps tenodesis procedures per 100,000 database patients increased 1.7-fold over the study period, from 8178 in 2008 to 14,014 in 2011 (P < .0001). An increase in the overall percentage volume was noted in patients aged 60-69 years (P = .039) and 20-29 years (P = .016). The overall charges for arthroscopic tenodesis increased at a rate significantly greater than that of open tenodesis (P < .0001). Rotator cuff tear or sprain, bicipital tenosynovitis, biceps tendon rupture, superior labral lesion, and osteoarthritis were the most common diagnoses associated with biceps tenodesis procedures. A significant increase in isolated biceps tenodesis was also observed over the study period, from 1967 patients in 2008 to 3565 patients in 2011, representing a 1.8-fold increase. CONCLUSION: The incidence of biceps tenodesis has increased yearly from 2008-2011. Arthroscopic tenodesis has emerged as a more popular technique. Charges associated with the procedure have increased significantly. Significant regional variations in procedural incidences exist.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After failure of nonoperative treatment, repair has long been the primary treatment option for symptomatic superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions of the shoulder. There is growing evidence to support both biceps tenotomy and tenodesis as effective alternative treatments for SLAP lesions. HYPOTHESES: For patients with isolated SLAP lesions, the frequency of SLAP repair has decreased, while treatment with biceps tenodesis and tenotomy has increased. Similar trends are expected in patients with SLAP lesions undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A query of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II database was performed from 2002 to 2011. The database was searched for patients with isolated SLAP lesions undergoing SLAP repair, open biceps tenodesis, arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, or biceps tenotomy. The database was then queried a second time for patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with concomitant SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, or biceps tenotomy. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2011, there were 8963 cases reported for the treatment of an isolated SLAP lesion and 1540 cases reported for the treatment of SLAP lesions with concomitant rotator cuff repair. For patients with isolated SLAP lesions, the proportion of SLAP repairs decreased from 69.3% to 44.8% (P < .0001), while biceps tenodesis increased from 1.9% to 18.8% (P < .0001), and biceps tenotomy increased from 0.4% to 1.7% (P = .018). For patients undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair, SLAP repair decreased from 60.2% to 15.3% (P < .0001), while biceps tenodesis or tenotomy increased from 6.0% to 28.0% (P < .0001). There was a significant difference in the mean age of patients undergoing SLAP repair (37.1 years) versus biceps tenodesis (47.2 years) versus biceps tenotomy (55.7 years) (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Practice trends for orthopaedic board candidates indicate that the proportion of SLAP repairs has decreased over time, with an increase in biceps tenodesis and tenotomy. Increased patient age correlates with the likelihood of treatment with biceps tenodesis or tenotomy versus SLAP repair.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Las características anatómicas especiales del tendón del bíceps se relacionan con su doble origen tendinoso, que confluye para formar un músculo con una inserción tendinosa distal única. En general, las roturas proximales se producen de forma traumática en varones de edad media, cuando realizan un movimiento excéntrico con el codo en flexión. Sin embargo, mientras que las roturas del bíceps proximal son mas frecuentes y requieren un tratamiento habitualmente conservador, las disrupciones del tendón distal son menos comunes y por el contrario requieren un tratamiento quirúrgico. La ecografía tiene muchas ventajas en el examen de la mayoría de los tendones, como el bíceps braquial proximal. Sin embargo, la disposición anatómica del bíceps distal, hace que la visualización del tendón conjunto y de su inserción radial a menudo sea poco fiable. Las lesiones proximales representan más del 90%de las que se producen en el bíceps braquial. Los procesos patológicos que se pueden observar ultrasonográficamente en este tendón son la tendinosis, tenosinovitis, roturas y luxaciones y el tratamiento sigue siendo un desafío. La dificultad radica en determinar si la lesión es aislada o es concomitante con patología del manguito rotador o con inestabilidad. Las roturas sintomáticas del tendón del bíceps pueden someterse a desbridamiento, tenotomía, o tenodesis si las medidas conservadoras no proporcionan alivio. En la porción distal se producen tendinosis, bursitis y roturas parciales o totales. El tratamiento conservador, está típicamente reservado para las lesiones parciales con poco compromiso funcional, y para los pacientes no aptos para la cirugía, aunque el tratamiento de las roturas completasen los atletas es principalmente quirúrgico y la decisión de cuándo tratar los desgarros parciales no está muy clara (AU)

The special anatomical features of the biceps tendon are the result of its dual original tendon, which converge to form a muscle with a single distal tendon attachment. In general, the proximal breaks are produced traumatic middle-aged men, when they perform an eccentric movement with the elbow flexed. However, while the proximal biceps tears are more common and usually require conservative treatment, distal tendon disruptions are less common and instead require surgical treatment. Ultrasound has many advantages in the examination of most of the tendons, and proximal brachial biceps. However, the anatomical arrangement of the distal biceps, makes viewing the radial insertion is often unreliable. Proximal lesions over 90% of which occur in the biceps brachii. Pathological processes that can be observed ultrasonographically in this tendon are tendinosis, tenosynovitis, ruptures and dislocations and treatment remains a challenge. The difficulty is in determining if the injury is isolated or is concomitant with rotator cuff pathology or with instability. Symptomatic ruptures of the biceps tendon may be treated debridement, tenotomy, or tenodesis if conservative measures fail to provide relief. In the distal portion occurring tendinosis, bursitis and partial or total tear. Conservative treatment is typically reserved for partial injuries with little functional compromise, and for patients unfit for surgery but the treatment of complete ruptures in athletes is primarily surgical, although the decision of when to treat partial tears is not so clear (AU)

Asunto(s)