RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea using fractional radiofrequency (FRF). METHODS: Twenty patients with a confirmed diagnosis of erythema capillaris rosacea were selected, and one side of each patient's face was randomly assigned to receive FRF treatments for three to six times, with an interval of 2 weeks between each treatment. VISIA, dermoscopy, and the Clinician's Erythema Evaluation Scale (CEA) were applied to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment before and after the treatment, to record the VAS scores and adverse reactions, and to conduct a patient satisfaction survey. RESULTS: The characteristic counts and scores of red zone and porphyrin as assessed by VISIA test were significantly decreased, and the difference between the treated side and the pretreatment side was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the efficacy of the treatment was statistically insignificant compared with the control side, except for the red zone and porphyrin which were statistically significant before and after the treatment (p > 0.05). By CEA score, the difference between the treated side after treatment and the control side was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the difference between the treated side before and after treatment was statistically significant (p < 0.05); the difference between the control side before and after treatment was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Dermatoscopic observation showed reduction in pore size, reduction of yellowish-white and black horn plugs within the pores, lightening of the red background and thinning and blurring of the capillary structure on the treated side of the skin compared to the control side, and the skin on the treated side showed the above mentioned changes before and after the treatment as well. The mean pain score of the subjects was obtained by VAS score 3.67 ± 0.90. Adverse effects included mild edema, erythema, and microscopic crusting; no long-term adverse effects were seen in all patients. The efficacy of FRF treatment was evaluated 1 month after the final treatment, and 85% of the subjects rated it as satisfactory, very satisfactory, and very satisfactory. CONCLUSION: FRF for the treatment of erythematous capillary dilatation rosacea is effective, safe, and suitable for clinical promotion.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Rosácea , Humanos , Rosácea/terapia , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Rosácea/radioterapia , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Terapia por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Terapia por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Dermoscopía , Eritema/etiología , Eritema/terapia , Telangiectasia/terapia , Telangiectasia/radioterapia , Telangiectasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cara , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Piel/patología , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Piel/irrigación sanguínea , Anomalías Múltiples , Cejas/anomalías , Enfermedad de DarierRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Telangiectasias, characterized by dilated venules, are frequently observed in the lower extremities. Sclerotherapy stands out as the predominant treatment of these vascular lesions. The integration of laser therapy with a mild sclerosing agent, serving as an osmotic sclerosant, presents an enhanced cosmetic treatment approach, aiming to optimize outcomes and minimize potential adverse effects. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy (CLaCS) and compare it with injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of telangiectasia and reticular veins. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, individuals expressing concerns about telangiectasia and reticular veins were recruited for aesthetic treatment. The enrolled patients were prospectively randomized according to the chosen treatment technique. Group A included patients undergoing CLaCS with 70% dextrose, focusing on a single area measuring 20 cm by 20 cm. Group B included patients receiving polidocanol injection sclerotherapy for a single area of the same dimensions. RESULTS: Group A comprised 195 patients and group B comprised 197 patients. The rates of complete lesion elimination after the first, second, and third treatment sessions were 64.6%, 86.2%, and 100% in group A and 50.3%, 74.1%, and 85.3% in group B, respectively. Group A exhibited a significantly higher complete elimination rate compared with group B at the conclusion of the study (P < .001). Furthermore, group A demonstrated a statistically significant lower incidence of postprocedural pigmentation and other complications compared with group B (P < .001). These findings underscore the enhanced efficacy and safety profile associated with the CLaCS technique using 70% dextrose compared with injection sclerotherapy with polidocanol. CONCLUSIONS: CLaCS, combining cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy, demonstrated superior efficacy and safety compared with traditional polidocanol sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasia and reticular veins.
Asunto(s)
Polidocanol , Soluciones Esclerosantes , Escleroterapia , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Telangiectasia/terapia , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Soluciones Esclerosantes/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Adulto , Polidocanol/administración & dosificación , Polidocanol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Glucosa/administración & dosificación , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Factibilidad , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Soluciones Esclerosantes , Escleroterapia , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Telangiectasia/terapia , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Fluoroscopía , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Soluciones Esclerosantes/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Mano/irrigación sanguínea , Persona de Mediana Edad , MasculinoRESUMEN
Growth in the research, innovation, and development of laser and energy-based technologies over the past few decades has led to dramatic increases in treatment options for dermatologic and cosmetic concerns of the periorbital area. We highlight recent treatment options using laser and energy-based devices for the clearance of periocular pigmented lesions, including solar lentigines and nevus of Ota; vascular lesions, including port-wine birthmarks, infantile hemangiomas, superficial telangiectasias, and reticular veins; laser ablation of benign tumors, such as xanthelasma; cosmetic rejuvenation; treatment of infraorbital dark circles and festoons; laser removal of eyebrow and eyeliner tattoos; and device-based treatment of chronic dry eyes.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Humanos , Rejuvenecimiento , Tatuaje , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Lentigo/terapia , Telangiectasia/terapia , Hemangioma/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim: This study was conducted to compare the results of spider vein: sclerotherapy or radiofrequency thermocoagulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The study included 52 patients with spider veins, who were randomized into two treatment groups: sclerotherapy or radiofrequency thermocoagulation. Treatment outcomes were assessed using: a self-assessed questionnaire, CIVIQ 20 questionnaire, computer evaluation of images, registration relapses complications, negative manifestations, and intensity of the pain syndrome. RESULTS: Results: Both methods showed a statistically significant difference in the quality of life indicators before and one month after treatment (p<0.001 for both groups). Radiofrequency thermocoagulation showed a greater impact on the patient's quality of life (p = 0.003). The average length of spider veins in the treatment area decreased the most with radiofrequency thermocoagulation (by 92.1%), slightly less after sclerotherapy (by 73.4%) (p < 0,01). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Both treatments have shown good results for spider veins and were reasonably safe with few negative manifestations. Radiofrequency coagulation better eliminates small veins, less than 0.3 mm.
Asunto(s)
Telangiectasia , Várices , Humanos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Várices/etiología , Várices/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Telangiectasia/etiología , Telangiectasia/terapia , ElectrocoagulaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Facial erythema can be seen in many patients. Despite various clinical trials exploring the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) in treating facial erythema, comprehensive evidence about the specific outcomes remains lacking. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched published studies in the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases based on established inclusion criteria. We calculated odds ratios (OR) to evaluate the effectiveness of IPL in patients with facial erythema. We used Review Manager 5.4.1 software for statistical data analyses with a 95% confidence interval (CI). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: This review includes seven studies with 219 patients, of which five compared the efficacy of IPL with pulsed dye laser (PDL). IPL significantly improved facial erythema compared to no treatment (OR=56.64, 95% CI: 22.70-141.33; P<0.00001). However, there was no significant difference between IPL and PDL treatment (OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.31-3.22; P=1.00). Moreover, there was no significant difference in patients with a >50% reduction in telangiectasias between IPL and PDL treatment (OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.39-2.56; P=1.00). Furthermore, IPL therapy had no apparent adverse effects for most people besides transitory edema and erythema. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicated that IPL could effectively and safely improve facial erythema with similar efficacy to PDL. Based on its comprehensive function, light side effects, and long curative effect, IPL appears to be a good alternative for treating facial erythema. However, further prospective and high-quality studies are required.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Láseres de Colorantes , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Eritema/etiología , Eritema/terapia , Láseres de Colorantes/efectos adversos , Telangiectasia/terapia , Telangiectasia/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of sclerotherapy efficacy for lower limb telangiectasias, which is the standard treatment for such condition, is commonly assisted by scores based on before and after pictures. This method is marked by its subjectivity, which impairs the precision of studies on the subject, making it unfeasible to evaluate and compare different interventions. We hypothesize that a quantitative method for evaluating the effectiveness of sclerotherapy for lower limb telangiectasias may present more reproducible results. Reliable measurement methods and new technologies may become part of the clinical practice in the near future. METHODS: Before and after treatment photographs were analyzed using a quantitative method and compared with a validated qualitative method based on improvement scores. Reliability analysis of the methods was performed, applying the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa coefficient with quadratic weights (Fleiss Cohen), for analysis of inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement in both evaluation methods. Convergent validity was evaluated by applying the Spearman test. To assess the applicability of the quantitative scale, the Mann-Whitney test was used. RESULTS: A better agreement between examiners is shown for the quantitative scale, with a mean kappa of .3986 (.251-.511) for qualitative analysis and a mean kappa of .788 (.655-.918) for quantitative analysis (P < .001 for all examiners). Convergent validity was achieved by correlation coefficients of .572 to .905 (P < .001). The quantitative scale results obtained between the specialists with different degrees of experience did not show statistical difference (seniors: 0.71 [-0.48/1.00] × juniors: 0.73 [-0.34/1.00]; P = .221). CONCLUSIONS: Convergent validity between both analyses has been achieved, but quantitative analysis has been shown to be more reliable and can be applied by professionals of any degree of experience. The validation of quantitative analysis is a major milestone for the development of new technology and automated, reliable, applications.
Asunto(s)
Escleroterapia , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Telangiectasia/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia/terapia , Extremidad InferiorRESUMEN
Skin hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy with polidocanol-containing sclerosants is a common local side effect. Sclerotherapists should be familiar with factors that trigger hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy with polidocanol-containing sclerosants. A systematic literature review of works reporting hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy for telangiectasias, reticular veins, side branches and truncal varices with polidocanol-containing sclerosants was performed. Reported incidence rates, follow-up periods and potentially triggering factors were assessed and analysed. The search yielded 1687 results; of these, 27 reports met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of hyperpigmentation seemed to increase with higher concentrations of polidocanol and was more evident after sclerotherapy for epifascial veins than for intrafascial truncal veins when the polidocanol concentration was more than 0.25%. Regarding sclerotherapy for telangiectasias and reticular veins, the incidence of hyperpigmentation ranged between 2% and 25% for polidocanol 0.25% (liquid and foam), between 12.5% and 67.9% for polidocanol 0.5% (liquid and foam) and between 13% and 73% for polidocanol 1% (liquid and foam). Regarding truncal veins, the incidence ranged from 7% to 45.8% for polidocanol 1% (liquid and foam), from 16% to 17% for polidocanol 2% (foam) and from 7.4% to 32.5% for polidocanol 3% (liquid and foam). Regarding the treatment of side branches, the incidence of hyperpigmentation ranged from 5.6% to 53% for both foam and liquid sclerotherapy. Regarding the duration of hyperpigmentation, there are few data describing reticular veins and telangiectasias. Hyperpigmentation persisting for more than 6 months has been reported to have an incidence of up to 7.5%. Hyperpigmentation persisting for more than 1 year after foam polidocanol 1%-3% treatment for truncal veins has an incidence ranging from 8.1% to 17.5%. Other factors such as higher volumes and compression therapy after treatment seem to have a minor influence. Data regarding hyperpigmentation after polidocanol-related sclerotherapy are poor and should be improved by higher-quality research.
Asunto(s)
Hiperpigmentación , Telangiectasia , Várices , Humanos , Polidocanol/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Várices/tratamiento farmacológico , Várices/etiología , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Telangiectasia/inducido químicamente , Telangiectasia/terapia , Hiperpigmentación/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Facial and neckline telangiectasias have an underestimated yet important impact on quality of life of patients with systemic scleroderma (SSc). This monocentric, prospective, open-label, intra-patient comparative study was conducted in 21 consecutive patients with SSc. Patients underwent 4 sessions of PDL 8 weeks apart. A final quadruple assessment was performed by several raters 2 months after the last session, based on the following criteria: change in telangiectasia number; subjective improvement score (LINKERT scale); impact on the quality of life (QoL; SKINDEX score); visual analog pain scale; adverse effects (AEs), including treatment discontinuation for PDL-induced purpura and patient satisfaction. The mean telangiectasia number decreased by 5 (32%) at the end of the protocol. Eighteen patients (85.7%) reported an improvement or a strong improvement, versus 73.81% for the expert committee. Immediate session pain (mean = 3.4/10) was slightly less than overall pain (mean = 4.6/10). Ten patients (47%) experienced at least one AE (oozing/crusts, edema, epidermal blistering), including PDL-induced purpura in 3 patients (14%). AEs were mostly transient (<1 week) and mild (CTCAE grade 1). All QoL parameters improved after treatment, and 85% of patients were satisfied.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Colorantes , Púrpura , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Láseres de Colorantes/efectos adversos , Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Telangiectasia/etiología , Telangiectasia/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy is commonly performed for elimination of reticular and telangiectatic leg veins. There are several variations in practice, from the preparation to post-therapy directives. OBJECTIVE: To critically examine the misconceptions of sclerotherapy for aesthetic indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review assesses evidence for and against each of the most common myths regarding sclerotherapy for aesthetic indications. RESULTS: Sclerotherapy can be safely used to treat veins in areas other than the lower extremities, with the exception of the face. Laser therapy is not superior to sclerotherapy for the treatment of small telangiectatic veins on the lower extremities. The type of syringe used to produce foam sclerotherapy is an important procedural consideration. After sclerotherapy, graduated compression stocking usage is a vital part of the procedure. Detergent sclerotherapy agents are similar, but not equivalent. Touch-up treatments after sclerotherapy should not be performed for 2 months post-treatment. Foam sclerotherapy does not have a high risk for air emboli. It is not advisable to treat the leg veins in "sections." Finally, one cannot reliably treat the telangiectatic veins without treating the feeding reticular veins for a satisfactory result. CONCLUSION: Many aspects of sclerotherapy have existing evidence to dictate best clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Telangiectasia , Várices , Estética , Humanos , Soluciones Esclerosantes/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Telangiectasia/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Várices/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
TEMPI (telangiectasias, elevated erythropoietin level and erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections, and intrapulmonary shunting) syndrome is a rare and newly defined multisystemic disease, which belongs to "monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significances". Due to its rarity, the etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical features of this disease remain largely unknown. Owing to its hidden and diverse clinical manifestations, missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis are common. In recent years, as more patients (including three fatal cases) were identified, some special clinical manifestations other than the typical pentad of TEMPI syndrome have been reported. Meanwhile, several studies attempting to identify the pathogenesis of TEMPI syndrome were conducted. In this review, we summarize the reported clinical characteristics of TEMPI syndrome and discuss the current and potential treatment options for patients with TEMPI syndrome, including those with relapsed/refractory disease. Furthermore, we provide an overview of current knowledge on the pathophysiology of TEMPI syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada , Paraproteinemias , Policitemia , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/diagnóstico , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Paraproteinemias/patología , Paraproteinemias/terapia , Policitemia/diagnóstico , Policitemia/patología , Policitemia/terapia , Síndrome , Telangiectasia/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia/patología , Telangiectasia/terapiaRESUMEN
Background and objectives: Facial telangiectasias are dilated blood vessels that can represent a cosmetic issue for patients. They may be associated with other conditions, such as rosacea. Laser and light treatments are nowadays becoming a cornerstone in the management of these lesions. Materials and Methods: In total, 68 patients seeking medical treatment for facial telangiectasias were enrolled from 1 March 2019 to 1 March 2020 at the Dermatological Unit of Magna Graecia University (Catanzaro, Italy). A protocol consisting of a 1064 Nd:YAG laser for darker blue telangiectasias and 532 nm Nd:YAG for red lesions followed by intense pulsed light with an optimized spectrum for vascular lesion 3 weeks after the first procedure was proposed. A three-month follow-up visit assessed patient's satisfaction using a visual analog scale (VAS). Two dermatologists measured clinical results using a 4-point scale, comparing pictures before treatment and at follow-up. Results: A total of 68 patients (32 males and 36 females) completed the study, performing all requested treatments. No severe side effects were reported. Patient satisfaction was very high (8.15 ± 1.05 out of a 10-point VAS scale), as well as dermatologists' clinical evaluations (2.19 ± 0.74 out of 3). Conclusions: The combination of vascular lasers and Vascular Intense Pulsed Light acting specifically on small blood vessels may help to improve the aesthetic outcome, reducing side effects. A prospective study with a larger number of participants will be necessary to confirm this study's findings.
Asunto(s)
Telangiectasia , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Rayos Láser , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Telangiectasia/terapiaRESUMEN
Evaluate the improvement in clinical signs and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) treated with intense pulsed light (IPL) using an acne filter. A retrospective chart review of 70 eyes of 35 patients with moderate-to-severe MGD treated with IPL using the acne filter was performed. IPL treatment was administered using the acne filter four times at 2- to 3-week intervals to upper and lower eyelids. We evaluated tear break-up time (TBUT), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, Sjögren's International Clinical Collaborative Alliance (SICCA) staining score, and Oxford staining grade. We performed Schirmer's test I without topical anesthesia, slit-lamp microscopic examination of lid margin and meibomian gland, and patient's symptom score assessment and evaluated the incidence of adverse effects in the ocular and periocular areas at baseline and 30 days after the final treatment. Significant improvements (P < 0.001) were observed in TBUT, SICCA staining score, Oxford staining grade, quality of meibum, consistency of meibum, lid margin telangiectasia, MGD grade, and patient's symptom scores after acne filter IPL treatment. Furthermore, the positivity (100 to 71.43%, P = 0.002) and level (2.43 ± 0.98 to 1.14 ± 0.78, P < 0.001) of MMP-9 significantly decreased after treatment. However, there was no significant improvement in Schirmer's test I (P = 0.224). No systemic or regional adverse effects were observed in any patient. IPL treatment using the acne filter is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for treating moderate-to-severe MGD, especially for lid margin telangiectasia and MMP-9.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Enfermedades de los Párpados , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Telangiectasia , Acné Vulgar/complicaciones , Acné Vulgar/terapia , Enfermedades de los Párpados/terapia , Humanos , Metaloproteinasa 9 de la Matriz , Glándulas Tarsales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Telangiectasia/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are opinions that telangiectasis and reticular veins are asymptomatic and constitute a cosmetic problem only. However, it has been proven that telangiectasis and reticular veins also affect the quality of life and are symptomatic. METHODS: Ninety consecutive female patients who were admitted to our outpatient clinic and did not have insufficiency in deep, superficial and perforating veins were included in this study. All participants were divided into three groups as the compression group (Group 1), medical treatment group (Group 2), and sclerotherapy group (Group 3). The initial complaint severities of all patients were noted. Except for patient compliance assessment, baseline, 1st month (T1), 3rd month (T2) and 6th month (T3) evaluation records were kept in all three groups. RESULTS: The study began with a total of 90 patients, 30 patients in each group. The mean ages of Groups 1, 2 and 3 were 39.73 ± 8.51 years, 39.30 ± 8.67 years, and 40.77 ± 9.45 years, respectively. The rates of decrease in pain, itching, restless leg, and muscle cramps were similar among the patient groups at all times (P > 0.05). The rate of reduction in swelling was similar between the groups at T1 and T2 (P > 0.05), while there was a significant difference between the groups at T3 (P = 0.009). The groups significantly differed in terms of appearance concern at all times (P = 0.002 for T1, P < 0.001 for T2 and T3). CONCLUSION: We showed that symptoms such as swelling and heaviness in leg can be improved with medical treatment, but the patient's cosmetic satisfaction can increase with sclerotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Telangiectasia , Várices , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Escleroterapia , Telangiectasia/terapia , VenasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Telangiectasias (spider veins) and reticular veins on the lower limbs are very common, increase with age, and have been found in 41% of women. The cause is unknown and the patients may be asymptomatic or can report pain, burning or itching. Treatments include sclerotherapy, laser, intense pulsed light, microphlebectomy and thermoablation, but none is established as preferable. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of sclerotherapy, laser therapy, intensive pulsed light, thermocoagulation, and microphlebectomy treatments for telangiectasias and reticular veins. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and CINAHL databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 16 March 2021. We undertook additional searches in LILACS and IBECS databases, reference checking, and contacted specialists in the field, manufacturers and study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared treatment methods such as sclerotherapy, laser therapy, intensive pulsed light, thermocoagulation, and microphlebectomy for telangiectasias and reticular veins in the lower limb. We included studies that compared individual treatment methods against placebo, or that compared different sclerosing agents, foam or laser treatment, or that used a combination of treatment methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently performed study selection, extracted data, assessed risks of bias and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The outcomes of interest were resolution or improvement (or both) of telangiectasias, adverse events (including hyperpigmentation, matting), pain, recurrence, time to resolution, and quality of life. MAIN RESULTS: We included 3632 participants from 35 RCTs. Studies compared a variety of sclerosing agents, laser treatment and compression. No studies investigated intensive pulsed light, thermocoagulation or microphlebectomy. None of the included studies assessed recurrence or time to resolution. Overall the risk of bias of the included studies was moderate. We downgraded the certainty of evidence to moderate or low because of clinical heterogeneity and imprecision due to the wide confidence intervals (CIs) and few participants for each comparison. Any sclerosing agent versus placebo There was moderate-certainty evidence that sclerosing agents showed more resolution or improvement of telangiectasias compared to placebo (standard mean difference (SMD) 3.08, 95% CI 2.68 to 3.48; 4 studies, 613 participants/procedures), and more frequent adverse events: hyperpigmentation (risk ratio (RR) 11.88, 95% CI 4.54 to 31.09; 3 studies, 528 participants/procedures); matting (RR 4.06, 95% CI 1.28 to 12.84; 3 studies, 528 participants/procedures). There may be more pain experienced in the sclerosing-agents group compared to placebo (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.34; 1 study, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence). Polidocanol versus any sclerosing agent There was no clear difference in resolution or improvement (or both) of telangiectasias (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.14; 7 studies, 852 participants/procedures), hyperpigmentation (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.43; 6 studies, 819 participants/procedures), or matting (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.27; 7 studies, 859 participants/procedures), but there were fewer cases of pain (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.08; 5 studies, 480 participants/procedures) in the polidocanol group. All moderate-certainty evidence. Sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS) versus any sclerosing agent There was no clear difference in resolution or improvement (or both) of telangiectasias (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.11; 4 studies, 473 participants/procedures). There was more hyperpigmentation (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.64; 4 studies, 478 participants/procedures), matting (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.85; 2 studies, 323 participants/procedures) and probably more pain (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.25; 4 studies, 409 participants/procedures). All moderate-certainty evidence. Foam versus any sclerosing agent There was no clear difference in resolution or improvement (or both) of telangiectasias (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.34; 2 studies, 187 participants/procedures); hyperpigmentation (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.44 to 10.23; 2 studies, 187 participants/procedures) or pain (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.24; 1 study, 147 participants/procedures). There may be more matting using foam (RR 6.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 35.98; 2 studies, 187 participants/procedures). All low-certainty evidence. Laser versus any sclerosing agent There was no clear difference in resolution or improvement (or both) of telangiectasias (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.07; 5 studies, 593 participants/procedures), or matting (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.19; 2 studies, 162 participants/procedures), and maybe less hyperpigmentation (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.80; 4 studies, 262 participants/procedures) in the laser group. All moderate-certainty evidence. High heterogeneity of the studies reporting on pain prevented pooling, and results were inconsistent (low-certainty evidence). Laser plus sclerotherapy (polidocanol) versus sclerotherapy (polidocanol) Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be more resolution or improvement (or both) of telangiectasias in the combined group (SMD 5.68, 95% CI 5.14 to 6.23; 2 studies, 710 participants), and no clear difference in hyperpigmentation (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.99; 2 studies, 656 participants) or matting (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.28; 2 studies, 656 participants). There may be more pain in the combined group (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.55; 1 study, 596 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Small numbers of studies and participants in each comparison limited our confidence in the evidence. Sclerosing agents were more effective than placebo for resolution or improvement of telangiectasias but also caused more adverse events (moderate-certainty evidence), and may result in more pain (low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a benefit in resolution or improvement for any sclerosant compared to another or to laser. There may be more resolution or improvement of telangiectasias in the combined laser and polidocanol group compared to polidocanol alone (low-certainty evidence). There may be differences between treatments in adverse events and pain. Compared to other sclerosing agents polidocanol probably causes less pain; STS resulted in more hyperpigmentation, matting and probably pain; foam may cause more matting (low-certainty evidence); laser treatment may result in less hyperpigmentation (moderate-certainty evidence). Further well-designed studies are required to provide evidence for other available treatments and important outcomes (such as recurrence, time to resolution and delayed adverse events); and to improve our confidence in the identified comparisons.
Asunto(s)
Telangiectasia , Venas , Femenino , Humanos , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Escleroterapia , Telangiectasia/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Telangiectasias are dilated blood vessels on the skin that develop progressively because of several diseases, including chronic venous disease. The skin blood flow has differences compared to the rest of the circulatory system. These vessels have a permanent vasoconstrictor tone that can respond to vasoconstriction/vasodilation stimulative substances and higher or lower temperatures. The aim of this study was to investigate any possible telangiectasias vasoconstriction or vasodilation in response to temperature changes. METHODS: This study is a clinical trial with 26 outpatients of vascular surgery with telangiectasias in the lower limbs. We used direct skin digital microscopy to obtain telangiectasias images at room temperature and after the thermal stimulus with cold pads. These photographs were processed using AmScopeAmLite (United Scope LLC Euromex Optics Group b.v., Los Angeles, CA, USA) and the capillary diameter and area were measured in Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). The data collected was analyzed in SPSS Statistics (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with a paired t-test for the telangiectasias area and a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for the telangiectasias diameter. RESULTS: In comparison to telangiectasias measures at room temperature, we found a statistically significant decrease in the diameter (median of -0.04 mm; interquartile range: -0.10 mm to -0.01 mm; P<0.001) and area (mean of -26.54 mm2; 95% Confidence interval (-36.31, -16.76) mm2; P<0.001 in response to the cold stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: Telangiectasias respond to cold patch application with a significantly statistical microscale quantifiable vasoconstriction. This intervention has the potential to improve the current state of telangiectasias sclerotherapy due to its mechanism helping to stabilize the applied foam. We speculate that topic cold used as a neoadjuvant treatment could improve the efficiency, stability, and other outcomes of sclerotherapy. Also, complementary use of topical cold stimulus application may be of interest in the therapeutic management of telangiectasias.
Asunto(s)
Telangiectasia , Humanos , Escleroterapia , Piel , Telangiectasia/terapia , Vasodilatación , VenasAsunto(s)
Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vasculares/terapia , Telangiectasia/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vasculares/patología , Telangiectasia/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Telangiectases of the nose are of esthetic concern and treatment is warranted. The study provides the results of 5 years of treatment of telangiectases of the nose region with the long-pulsed Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser. A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients of Fitzpatrick skin type II-V. Exclusion criteria were patients with a previous history of treatment of the nose region, pregnant or lactating patients or patients with unrealistic expectations regarding the treatment risks, limitations and results. Standardized photographs were obtained before each session and at least 2 months after the last treatment session. A long-pulsed Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser was used with a spot size of 2.5mm, fluence of 100 - 175 J/cm2, pulse duration of up to 135ms and repetition rate of 2-4 Hz. The follow-up ranged from 2 months to 5 years. The number of laser sessions varied from 1 to 5 monthly. Assessment was made by comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment photographs by two independent specialists and also by the patients' own assessment. All patients presented improvement of the vascular alterations. Evaluation of independent specialists as well as the evaluation of the patients themselves showed a high degree of satisfaction with the treatment. The treatment presented only few transitory side effects. Treatment of telangiectasia on the nose skin with the long-pulsed Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser demonstrated to be safe and effective even in darker pigmented skin. The major limitation of this study is its retrospective nature.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Telangiectasia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactancia , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Telangiectasia/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Medications used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease cause a wide range of dermatologic side effects, and minimal guidance exists on how to manage them. The intention of this review article is to summarize common dermatologic adverse reactions related to inflammatory bowel disease therapy and to provide evidence-based guidance on management. We conducted a scoping review using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting clinical information on dermatologic side effects of medications used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The most commonly reported dermatological adverse effects from inflammatory bowel disease therapy were cutaneous malignancy and cutaneous infections. Thiopurines, methotrexate, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, and integrin inhibitors can be continued if nonmelanoma skin cancer arises during therapy and the malignancy should be surgically excised. TNF inhibitors and IL-12/23 inhibitors can be continued in the setting of stage I surgically resectable melanoma but should be discontinued in advanced melanoma. For complicated cutaneous bacterial infections, methotrexate and TNF inhibitors should be halted, and IV antibiotics should be administered. Complicated herpes zoster infection warrants discontinuation of TNF inhibitors, whereas IL-12/23 and JAK inhibitors can be continued. Inflammatory bowel disease therapies are associated with several dermatological adverse effects, and management options vary by agent. Certain agents may require discontinuation in the setting of nonmelanoma skin cancer, melanoma, and cutaneous infections. Many other dermatological adverse effects from inflammatory bowel disease therapy require specialized management or referral to dermatology.