RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The indications for temporary abdominal closure in nontrauma surgery are heterogeneous and with limited data on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to report the outcomes of primary closure compared with temporary abdominal closure after nontrauma emergency laparotomy within a standardized clinical setting adapted from international guidelines. METHODS: Included were all nontrauma patients undergoing emergency laparotomy between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev in Denmark. All patients received treatment on the basis of standardized bundle of care trajectory for major emergency abdominal surgery. Mortality, risks of re-laparotomy, and postoperative complications were assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Of the 576 included patients, temporary abdominal closure was performed in 57 (10%) patients in the initial surgery. Indications for temporary abdominal closure included damage control strategy as the result of considerable hemodynamic instability in 21 (37%) patients, need for reassessment of bowel viability in 21 (37%) patients, and loss of domain in 15 (25%) patients. Fascial closure was achieved after a median period of 2 days. Sixty-seven patients (12%) underwent re-laparotomy, with temporary abdominal closure performed in 10 (15%) of the cases. Patients with temporary abdominal closure had a significantly greater risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.89, P = .003). There were no significant differences in the risks of fascial dehiscence, re-laparotomy, or 30- or 90-days mortality. CONCLUSION: Temporary abdominal closure was performed in 10% of patients undergoing nontrauma emergency laparotomy, with the primary indications being damage control strategy and need for reassessment of bowel viability. Patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure had a significantly greater risk of postoperative complications.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Laparotomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Laparotomía/métodos , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Dinamarca , Urgencias Médicas , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Abdomen/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The technique of open abdomen refers to a surgical procedure that intentionally involves leaving an opening in the abdominal wall. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, mortality, and morbidity of patients undergoing open abdomen in a public hospital in Brazil and investigate associated risk factors associated with the outcome. METHODS: Data from electronic medical records were collected from 2017 to 2022. The variables were used for descriptive analyses, association analysis, and survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: The sample included 104 patients, with 84 presenting with acute abdomen and 20 with trauma, having highly variable ages and comorbidities. Peritonitis and the need for early reoperation were the most common indication for the procedure, each accounting for 34%, and negative pressure wound therapy was the most commonly used technique. Fistula was the most frequent complication, with the majority forming in the early days after the surgery. The number of interventions and open abdomen time obtained statistical significance in comparison with the outcome. The overall mortality rate was 62,5%. CONCLUSION: Despite open abdomen being a technique that can have benefits in controlling intraabdominal contamination and preventing abdominal compartment syndrome, its implementation is associated with complications. The mortality and complication rates were high in this sample. The decision to use the technique should be individualized and based on several factors, including the indications and the patient's clinical status.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Universitarios , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brasil/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Abdomen Agudo/cirugía , Laparotomía , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Significance: The laparotomy is a common surgical procedure with a wide range of indications. Ideally, once the goals of surgery were achieved, the incision edges could then be approximated and the abdomen primarily closed. However, in some circumstances, it may be impossible to achieve primary closure, and instead the abdomen is intentionally left open. This review discusses the indications and objectives for the open abdomen (OA), summarizes the most common techniques for temporary abdominal closure, and illustrates treatment algorithms grounded in the current recommendations from specialty experts. Recent Advances: Still a relatively young technique, multiple strategies, and technologies have emerged to manage the OA. So too have the recommendations evolved, based on updated classifications that take wound characteristics into account. Recent studies have also brought greater clarity on recommendations for managing infection and malnutrition to support improved clinical outcomes. Critical Issues: The status of the OA can change rapidly depending on the patient's condition, the wound quality, and many other factors. Thus, there is a significant need for comprehensive treatment strategies that can be adapted to these developing circumstances. Future Directions: Treatment recommendations should be continuously updated as new technologies are introduced and old techniques fall out of use.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Humanos , Laparotomía/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Algoritmos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Abdomen/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: severe abdominal sepsis, accompained by diffuse peritonitis, poses a significant challenge for most surgeons. It often requires repetitive surgical interventions, leading to complications and resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates. The open abdomen technique, facilitated by applying a negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), reduces the duration of the initial surgical procedure, minimizes the accumulation of secretions and inflammatory mediators in the abdominal cavity and lowers the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and its associated complications. Another approach is primary closure of the abdominal aponeurosis, which involves suturing the layers of the abdominal wall. METHODS: the objective of this study is to conduct a survival analysis comparing the treatment of severe abdominal sepsis using open abdomen technique versus primary closure after laparotomy in a public hospital in the South of Brazil. We utilized data extracted from electronic medical records to perform both descriptive and survival analysis, employing the Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test. RESULTS: the study sample encompassed 75 laparotomies conducted over a span of 5 years, with 40 cases employing NPWT and 35 cases utilizing primary closure. The overall mortality rate observed was 55%. Notably, survival rates did not exhibit statistical significance when comparing the two methods, even after stratifying the data into separate analysis groups for each technique. CONCLUSION: recent publications on this subject have reported some favorable outcomes associated with the open abdomen technique underscoring the pressing need for a standardized approach to managing patients with severe, complicated abdominal sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Laparotomía , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Sepsis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Sepsis/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Peritonitis/cirugía , Peritonitis/mortalidad , Peritonitis/etiología , Terapia de Presión Negativa para HeridasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Open abdomen therapy (OAT) is commonly used to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of OAT after rAAA from 2006 to 2021. Investigating data on resuscitation fluid, weight gain, and cumulative fluid balance could provide a more systematic approach to determining the timing of safe abdominal closure. METHODS: This was a single centre observational cohort study. The study included all patients treated for rAAA followed by OAT from October 2006 to December 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-two of the 244 patients who underwent surgery for rAAA received OAT. The mean age was 72 ± 7.85 years, and most were male (n = 61, 85%). The most frequent comorbidities were cardiac disease (n = 31, 43%) and hypertension (n = 31, 43%). Fifty-two patients (72%) received prophylactic OAT, and 20 received OAT for ACS (28%). There was a 25% mortality rate in the prophylactic OAT group compared with the 50% mortality in those who received OAT for ACS (p = .042). The 58 (81%) patients who survived until closure had a median of 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 9, 16.5) days of OAT and 5 (IQR 4, 7) dressing changes. There was one case of colocutaneous fistula and two cases of graft infection. All 58 patients underwent successful abdominal closure, with 55 (95%) undergoing delayed primary closure. In hospital survival was 85%. Treatment trends over time showed the increased use of prophylactic OAT (p ≤ .001) and fewer ACS cases (p = .03) assessed by Fisher's exact test. In multivariable regression analysis fluid overload and weight reduction predicted 26% of variability in time to closure. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic OAT after rAAA can be performed safely, with a high rate of delayed primary closure even after long term treatment.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Hipertensión Intraabdominal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/efectos adversos , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/etiología , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/prevención & control , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tracción/efectos adversos , Tracción/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/instrumentación , Fasciotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We examined outcomes in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia (AMI) with the hypothesis that Open Abdomen (OA) is associated with decreased mortality. METHODS: We performed a cohort study reviewing NSQIP emergency laparotomy patients, 2016-2020, with a postoperative diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia. OA was defined using flags for patients without fascial closure. Logistic regression was used with outcomes of 30-day mortality and several secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 5514 cases, 4624 (83.9%) underwent resection and 387 (7.0%) underwent revascularization. The OA rate was 32.6%. 10.8% of patients who were closed required reoperation. After adjustment for demographics, transfer status, comorbidities, preoperative variables including creatinine, white blood cell count, and anemia, as well as operative time, OA was associated with OR 1.58 for mortality (95% CI [1.38, 1.81], p < 0.001). Among revascularizations, there was no such association (p = 0.528). OA was associated with ventilator support >48 h (OR 4.04, 95% CI [3.55, 4.62], and p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: OA in AMI was associated with increased mortality and prolonged ventilation. This is not so in revascularization patients, and 1 in 10 patients who underwent primary closure required reoperation. OA should be considered in specific cases of AMI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort, Level III.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Mesentérica , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidad , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We sought to better characterize outcomes in pediatric patients requiring open abdomen for instability with ongoing resuscitation, second look surgery, or left in discontinuity or congenital or acquired loss of domain that may lead to prolonged open abdomen (POA) or difficulties in successful abdominal wall closure. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients aged less or equal to 18 years who presented to our institution from 2015 to 2022. We defined POA as requiring three or more surgeries prior to abdominal wall closure. Descriptive statistics were performed using median and interquartile range. RESULTS: Median age was 15 years (interquartile range 0-6 years), 46% female, and 69% White. Survival rate was 93% for the entire cohort. The most common indication for open abdomen was second look/discontinuity 22/41 (54%). The most common temporary abdominal wall closure was wound vac (43%). Fifty eight percent patients achieved primary tissue closure, the remaining required mesh. Of the 42 patients, 25 required POA. They had increasing rate of secondary infections at 56% compared to 44% (P = 0.17). The groups were further divided into indications for open abdomen including ongoing resuscitation, second look/discontinuity, and loss of domain with similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series of long-term outcomes in pediatric patients with an open abdomen, we found that a majority of children were able to be primarily closed without mesh despite the number of surgeries required. Further studies require a protocolized approach to improve the long-term outcomes of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Adolescente , Recién Nacido , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/estadística & datos numéricos , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Leakage of intestinal fluid is a challenging event when it appears in an open abdomen (OA) and surgical deviation does not seem possible. Intestinal contents in the abdominal cavity maintain inflammation and drainage is there for essential. We have developed a method, ChimneyVAC, to treat both deep and superficial enteroatmospheric fistulas (EAF) AIMS: To describe this innovative surgical technique and our 10-year experience. MATERIAL & METHODS: This single-center observational cohort study included all 16 consecutive patients treated with ChimneyVAC. Seven women and 9 men; median age: 47; (interquartile range [IQR]:39-63) years, 15 with a small bowel fistula and 1 with a large bowel fistula. All except of the colonic fistula were classified as a high output fistula; 14 were deep and 2 superficial. In this technique, a negative-pressure source is applied directly above the fistula opening, in addition to negative pressure wound therapy for the OA. This controls the leakage of intestinal fluid by direct drainage into a vacuum system, thereby avoiding contamination of the abdomen. A controlled enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) then forms as the traction from the ChimneyVAC brings the fistula opening to skin level. RESULTS: In 14 patients, an ECF formed after a median of 42 (IQR:28-55) days and 12 (IQR:7-16) dressing changes. The median length of hospitalization was 103 (IQR:58-143) days. Two patients died of multiorgan failure and 14 initially survived. DISCUSSION: This study showed that 14 out of 16 patients survived the initial treatment for enteric leakage with the ChimneyVAC method. The outcome of ChimneyVAC treatment is a controlled ECF, which was then corrected after a median of six months. However, hospitalization is lengthy, the patients undergo several dressing changes and many needs additional parenteral nutrition until intestinal continuity is reestablished. CONCLUSION: ChimneyVAC is a feasible method for treatment of EAF in an OA, with favorable survival.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Intestinal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Humanos , Femenino , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open Abdomen (OA) cases represent a significant surgical and resource challenge. AbClo is a novel non-invasive abdominal fascial closure device that engages lateral components of the abdominal wall muscles to support gradual approximation of the fascia and reduce the fascial gap. The study objective was to assess the economic implications of AbClo compared to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone on OA management. METHODS: We conducted a cost-minimization analysis using a decision tree comparing the use of the AbClo device to NPWT alone among patients with midline laparotomy for trauma or acute abdominal surgery who were ineligible for primary fascial closure. The time horizon was limited to the length of the inpatient hospital stay, and costs were considered from the perspective of the US Medicare payer. Clinical effectiveness data for AbClo was obtained from a randomized clinical trial. Cost data was obtained from the published literature. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. The primary outcome was incremental cost. RESULTS: The mean cumulative costs per patient were $76 582 for those treated with NPWT alone and $70,582 for those in the group treated with the AbClo device. Compared to NPWT alone, AbClo was associated with lower incremental costs of -$6012 (95% CI -$19 449 to +$1996). The probability that AbClo was cost-savings compared to NPWT alone was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AbClo is an economically attractive strategy for management of OA in in patients with midline laparotomy for trauma or acute abdominal surgery who were ineligible for primary fascial closure.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Humanos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/economía , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/instrumentación , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/economía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/instrumentación , Fasciotomía/economía , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estados Unidos , Laparotomía/economía , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/economíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to establish an animal model of open abdomen (OA) through temporary abdominal closure via different techniques. METHODS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: group A (OA with polypropylene mesh alone); group B (OA with polypropylene mesh combined with a patch); and group C (OA with polypropylene mesh and a sutured patch). Vital signs, pathophysiological changes, and survival rates were closely monitored in the rats for 7 days after surgery. Abdominal X-rays and histopathological examinations were performed to assess abdominal organ changes and wound healing. RESULTS: The results showed no significant difference in mortality rates among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, rats in group B exhibited superior overall condition, cleaner wounds, and a higher rate of wound healing compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Abdominal X-rays indicated that varying degrees of distal intestinal obstruction in all groups. Histopathological examinations revealed fibrous hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration, neovascularization, and collagen deposition in all groups. Group B demonstrated enhanced granulation tissue generation, neovascularization, and collagen deposition compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Polypropylene mesh combined with patches is the most suitable method for establishing an animal model of OA. This model successfully replicated the pathological and physiological changes in postoperative patients with OA, specifically the progress of abdominal skin wound healing. It provides a practical and reliable animal model for OA research.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Cicatrización de Heridas , Animales , Masculino , Ratas , Polipropilenos , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Abdomen/cirugía , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Open abdomen therapy is an effective method for the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections, abdominal hypertension and other critical abdominal diseases. Bases on systematic reviews of indications, classification and staging of wounds, principles and approaches of open abdomen therapy, abdominal closure measures, and management of enteroatmospheric fistula, the Chinese expert consensus on open abdomen therapy provides 12 recommendations with evidence and specific explanations. This consensus is the first systematic work in China to elaborate on open abdomen therapy, helping clinicians to standardize this technique and improve the treatment outcomes of critical abdominal diseases. In this review, we make interpretations on key points of this consensus one by one.
Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Humanos , China , ConsensoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prediction modelling increasingly becomes an important risk assessment tool in perioperative systems approaches, e.g. in complex patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis. In this population, combining predictors from multiple medical domains (i.e. demographical, physiological and surgical variables) outperforms the prediction capabilities of single-domain prediction models. However, the benefit of these prediction models for clinical decision-making remains to be investigated. We therefore examined the clinical utility of mortality prediction models in patients suffering from peritonitis with a decision curve analysis. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a large dataset, a traditional logistic regression approach, three machine learning methods and a stacked ensemble were employed to examine the predictive capability of demographic, physiological and surgical variables in predicting mortality under open abdomen treatment for peritonitis. Calibration was examined with calibration belts and predictive performance was assessed with the area both under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) and with the Brier Score. Clinical utility of the prediction models was examined by means of a decision curve analysis (DCA) within a treatment threshold range of interest of 0-30%, where threshold probabilities are traditionally defined as the minimum probability of disease at which further intervention would be warranted. RESULTS: Machine learning methods supported available evidence of a higher prediction performance of a multi- versus single-domain prediction models. Interestingly, their prediction performance was similar to a logistic regression model. The DCA demonstrated that the overall net benefit is largest for a multi-domain prediction model and that this benefit is larger compared to the default "treat all" strategy only for treatment threshold probabilities above about 10%. Importantly, the net benefit for low threshold probabilities is dominated by physiological predictors: surgical and demographics predictors provide only secondary decision-analytic benefit. CONCLUSIONS: DCA provides a valuable tool to compare single-domain and multi-domain prediction models and demonstrates overall higher decision-analytic value of the latter. Importantly, DCA provides a means to clinically differentiate the risks associated with each of these domains in more depth than with traditional performance metrics and highlighted the importance of physiological predictors for conservative intervention strategies for low treatment thresholds. Further, machine learning methods did not add significant benefit either in prediction performance or decision-analytic utility compared to logistic regression in these data.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Peritonitis , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Aprendizaje Automático , Peritonitis/cirugíaRESUMEN
Open abdomen therapy is an effective treatment to deal with severe abdominal infections, abdominal hypertension and other critical abdominal diseases. However, this therapy is difficult to implement and has many uncertainties in the timing, manners, and follow-up treatment, which leads to the fact that open abdomen therapy is not very accessible and standardized in medical systems of China. This consensus aims to provide guiding principles for indications and implementation of open abdomen, classification methods of open abdomen wounds, technologies for abdominal closure, and management of enteroatmospheric fistula, so as to improve the accessibility and success rate of open abdomen in China.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Intestinal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Humanos , Abdomen/cirugía , Consenso , Fístula Intestinal/terapiaRESUMEN
Open abdomen therapy is an effective treatment to deal with severe abdominal infections, abdominal hypertension and other critical abdominal diseases. However, this therapy is difficult to implement and has many uncertainties in the timing, manners, and follow-up treatment, which leads to the fact that open abdomen therapy is not very accessible and standardized in medical systems of China. This consensus aims to provide guiding principles for indications and implementation of open abdomen, classification methods of open abdomen wounds, technologies for abdominal closure, and management of enteroatmospheric fistula, so as to improve the accessibility and success rate of open abdomen in China.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Abdomen/cirugía , Consenso , Fístula Intestinal/terapia , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Técnicas de Abdomen AbiertoRESUMEN
Introducción. Una de las principales intervenciones que realiza el profesional de enfermería es el cuidado de las heridas, su finalidad es evitar posibles complicaciones y estimular la cicatrización del tejido lesionado. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar las intervenciones de enfermería realizadas en pacientes con abdomen abierto y fístulas enterocutáneas mediante la revisión de literatura. Metodología. Se realizó una revisión narrativa en un lapso de 10 meses. Las bases de datos utilizadas fueron: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, MEDLINE, SciELO y Ovid. Se realizó revisión de 50 artículos que cumplían con el objetivo de la revisión. Resultados. Se encontraron cuidados de enfermería relacionados con los cuidados básicos y específicos en pacientes con abdomen abierto y en fístulas enterocutáneas. Discusión. Diversos autores coinciden en que el uso de la Bolsa de Bogotá, es una de las intervenciones de enfermería más utilizadas para las heridas de abdomen abierto, la medición intraabdominal, que permite la identificación precoz del Síndrome Compartimental Abdominal, y el mantenimiento del objetivo nutricional en pacientes con fístulas enterocutáneas, permiten una recuperación exitosa. Conclusiones. Se pudo determinar que existen diversos cuidados de enfermería que deben considerarse en el manejo del abdomen abierto y de las fístulas enterocutáneas, todos estos cuidados permiten que el personal de enfermería tenga un soporte científico útil en el momento de brindar un cuidado a los pacientes con estas condiciones de salud. Esto, con el fin de evitar o disminuir los riesgos de deshidratación, desequilibrio hidroelectrolítico, desnutrición, sepsis e incluso la muerte.
Introduction. One of the main interventions carried out by nursing professionals is the care of wounds. Its purpose is to avoid possible complications and stimulate the scarring of the wounded tissue. The objective of this investigation was to determine the nursing interventions carried out in patients with open abdomens and enterocutaneous fistulas via a literature review. Methodology. A narrative review was carried out over 10 months. The databases used were: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, MEDLINE, SciELO, and Ovid. Fifty articles that met the objective of the review were used. Results. Nursing care related to basic and specific care in patients with open abdomens and enterocutaneous fistulas was found. Discussion. Different authors agree on the use of the Bogotá Bag, is one of the most used nursing interventions for open abdominal wounds, intraabdominal measurement, which allows for early identification of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, and maintenance of nutritional objectives in patients with enterocutaneous fistulas allow for successful recovery. Conclusions. We could determine that there are different types of nursing care that must be considered in the handling of open abdomen and enterocutaneous fistulas. All these types of care allow for nursing staff to have a useful scientific support when providing care to patients with these health conditions. This is in order to avoid or reduce the risks of dehydration, hydroelectrolytic imbalance, malnutrition, sepsis, and even death.
Introdução. Uma das principais intervenções realizadas pelo profissional de enfermagem é o cuidado de feridas, sua finalidade é evitar possíveis complicações e estimular a cicatrização do tecido lesado. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi determinar as intervenções de enfermagem realizadas em pacientes com abdome aberto e fístulas enterocutâneas por meio de uma revisão de literatura. Metodologia. Foi realizada uma revisão narrativa durante um período de 10 meses. As bases de dados utilizadas foram: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, MEDLINE, SciELO e Ovid. Foi realizada uma revisão de 50 artigos que atenderam ao objetivo da revisão. Resultados. Foram encontrados cuidados de enfermagem relacionados aos cuidados básicos e específicos em pacientes com abdome aberto e fístulas enterocutâneas. Discussão. Vários autores concordam que o uso da Bolsa de Bogotá, é uma das intervenções de enfermagem mais utilizadas para feridas abertas abdominais; a medida intra-abdominal, que permite a identificação precoce da Síndrome do Compartimento Abdominal; e a manutenção do objetivo nutricional nos pacientes com fístulas enterocutâneas, permitem uma recuperação bem sucedida. Conclusões. Foi possível determinar que existem diversos cuidados de enfermagem que devem ser considerados no manejo de abdome aberto e fístulas enterocutâneas, todos esses cuidados permitem que a equipe de enfermagem tenha um apoio científico útil no momento de prestar cuidados aos pacientes com estas condições de saúde. Isso, a fim de evitar ou reduzir os riscos de desidratação, desequilíbrio hidroeletrolítico, desnutrição, sepse e até mesmo a morte.
Asunto(s)
Atención de Enfermería , Fístula Intestinal , Revisión , Fístula Cutánea , Técnicas de Abdomen AbiertoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the open abdomen technique (laparostomy) used in complications of major gynecological oncology surgery. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively the surgical database of all patients who had undergone major open surgery by the same gynecologic oncologist over a 5-year period. All patients who had had open abdomen procedure were identified; demographic data and indications of primary surgery, temporary abdominal closure procedure details, fascia closure and morbidity, mortality rates were evaluated. Intraabdominal infection and intraoperative massive hemorrhage were the major indications for all open abdomen cases. Mannheim Peritonitis Index was used perioperatively to determine open abdomen decision in intraabdominal infections. Vacuum Assisted Abdominal Closure system and Bogota Bag were used for temporary abdominal closure techniques. RESULTS: Out of the total 560 patients who had undergone major oncological surgery, 19 patients (3.3%) had open abdomen procedure due to surgical complications. Eleven patients had intraabdominal infection, six patients had hemodynamic instability due to peri and postoperative hemorrhage, two patients had gross fecal contamination during posterior pelvic exenteration surgery. The fascia was closed totally in 15 (78%), partially in 3 (15%) and could not be closed in 1 patient who had died secondary to multiorgan failure. Total morbidity and mortality rates were 26% (5/19) (two intrabdominal abscess, one pulmonary embolism, one skin necrosis, one enteroatmospheric fistula) and 5.2% (1/19) respectively. CONCLUSION: Open abdomen is a life-saving procedure when applied with correct indications and timing. Gynecological oncologic surgeries are candidates to serious complications and gynecologic oncologists dealing with such surgery should be as experienced as general surgeons in this regard.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Abdomen/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
This is a review of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) strategies are necessary in cases where definitive surgery is not possible. Indications for TAC include damage control due to unstable physiology, the need for a second look, or lacking technical possibility for fascial closure. The superior method of TAC is vacuum-assisted closure (VAC), with or without a traction mesh. All TAC strategies, including VAC, are associated with an increased number of surgical procedures, increased risk of complications, and prolonged length of stay. TAC should be limited to selected patients and performed by senior surgeons.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Abdomen/cirugía , Humanos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , TracciónRESUMEN
Numerous patient-related clinical parameters and treatment-specific variables have been identified as causing or contributing to the severity of peritonitis. We postulated that a combination of clinical and surgical markers and scoring systems would outperform each of these predictors in isolation. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed a multivariable model to examine whether survival outcome can reliably be predicted in peritonitis patients treated with open abdomen. This single-center retrospective analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression modeling in combination with repeated random sub-sampling validation to examine the predictive capabilities of domain-specific predictors (i.e., demography, physiology, surgery). We analyzed data of 1,351 consecutive adult patients (55.7% male) who underwent open abdominal surgery in the study period (January 1998 to December 2018). Core variables included demographics, clinical scores, surgical indices and indicators of organ dysfunction, peritonitis index, incision type, fascia closure, wound healing, and fascial dehiscence. Postoperative complications were also added when available. A multidomain peritonitis prediction model (MPPM) was constructed to bridge the mortality predictions from individual domains (demographic, physiological and surgical). The MPPM is based on data of n = 597 patients, features high predictive capabilities (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.87 (0.85 to 0.90, 95% CI)) and is well calibrated. The surgical predictor "skin closure" was found to be the most important predictor of survival in our cohort, closely followed by the two physiological predictors SAPS-II and MPI. Marginal effects plots highlight the effect of individual outcomes on the prediction of survival outcome in patients undergoing staged laparotomies for treatment of peritonitis. Although most single indices exhibited moderate performance, we observed that the predictive performance was markedly increased when an integrative prediction model was applied. Our proposed MPPM integrative prediction model may outperform the predictive power of current models.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto , Peritonitis , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía , Masculino , Peritonitis/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Introducción. El abdomen abierto es un recurso útil para el tratamiento de pacientes con patología abdominal compleja, con potencial de complicaciones. El objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar la guía de World Society of Emer-gency Surgery (WSES) 2018, en un hospital de nivel III de atención de la ciudad de Popayán, Colombia, y comparar los resultados obtenidos con los previos a su implementación. Métodos. Estudio cuasi-experimental en dos mediciones de pacientes con abdomen abierto y estancia en cuidado crítico, durante los meses de abril a octubre de los años 2018 y 2019, antes y después de la adaptación con el personal asistencial de la guía de práctica clínica WSES 2018. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva, prueba de Chi cuadrado y se empleó el software SPSS V.25. Resultados. Se incluyeron 99 pacientes críticos, con una edad media de 53,2 años, con indicación de abdomen abierto por etiología traumática en el 28,3 %, infecciosa no traumática en el 32,3 % y no traumática ni infecciosa en el 37,4 %. La mortalidad global fue de 25,3 %, de los cuales, un 68 % se debieron a causas ajenas a la patología abdominal. Las complicaciones postoperatorias se presentaron en 10 pacientes con infección de sitio operatorio y 9 pacientes con fístula enterocutánea. El uso del doble Viaflex se implementó en un 63,6 %, logrando un cierre de la pared abdominal en el 79,8 % de los casos (p=0,038). Conclusión. El abdomen abierto requiere de un abordaje multidisciplinar. El uso de doble Viaflex es una herramienta simple y efectiva. La implementación de la guía disminuyó el porcentaje de mortalidad, los días de abdomen abierto y la estancia en cuidados intensivos.
Introduction. The open abdomen is a useful resource for the treatment of patients with complex abdominal pathology, with the potential for complications. The aim of this study was to adapt the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WJES) 2018 guidelines, in a tertiary level hospital and compare the results obtained with those prior to its implementation. Methods. Experimental study in two measurements of patients with open abdomen and stay in critical care, during the months of April to October in 2018 and 2019, before and after the adaptation with the healthcare personnel of the WSES 2018 clinical practice guide. Descriptive statistics, Chi square test and SPSS V.25 software were used. Results. Ninety-nine critically ill patients were included, with a mean age of 53.2 years, with an indication of open abdomen due to traumatic etiology in 28.3%, infectious non-traumatic in 32.3%, and non-traumatic or infectious in 37.4 %. Overall mortality was 25.3%, of which 68% were due to causes other than abdominal pathology. Post-operative complications occurred in 10 patients with surgical site infection and 9 patients with enterocutaneous fistula. The use of the double Viaflex was implemented in 63.6%, achieving a closure of the abdominal wall in 79.8% (p=0.038) of the cases.Conclusion. The open abdomen requires a multidisciplinary approach. The use of double Viaflex is a simple and effective tool. The implementation of the guide decreased the percentage of mortality, the days of open abdomen and the stay in intensive care unit.