RESUMEN
China's healthcare system faces significant challenges, notably the underutilization of primary healthcare resources and the inefficient distribution of healthcare services. In response, this article explores the effectiveness of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NRCMS) in improving healthcare accessibility and primary care utilization. Employing a multi-period difference-in-differences model and using data from the China Family Panel Studies spanning 2012-20, it aims to empirically examine how health insurance policy incentivizing primary care influences rural residents' health-seeking behaviour and enhances the efficiency of resource utilization. Results indicate that NRCMS significantly improves the probability of rural residents seeking healthcare services at primary healthcare centres (PHCs), especially for outpatient services. This effect can be attributed to the substantially higher outpatient reimbursement rates at PHCs compared to higher-level medical institutions. Conversely, the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance fails to increase urban residents' engagement with primary care, reinforcing the role of price sensitivity in healthcare choices among insured lower-income rural population. Furthermore, the study reveals a stronger preference for PHCs among younger, less-educated insured residents and highlights a synergistic effect between the availability of primary healthcare resources and insurance coverage on primary care utilization. These findings offer crucial implications for refining health insurance policies to improve healthcare service accessibility and efficiency.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Población Rural , Humanos , China , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Adulto , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medicaid, unlike any other insurance mechanism, imposes a consent requirement on female patients desiring sterilization that must be completed at least 30 days, but no more than 180 days, before sterilization. Desired sterilization cannot be completed in the Medicaid population without this consent. Large-scale national evidence is lacking on the effect of this requirement. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the influence of insurance status on the achievement of postpartum sterilization after a self-reported unwanted birth in a nationally representative sample. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth. The National Survey of Family Growth uses a stratified, multistage clustered sample to make nationally representative estimates for men and women aged 15 to 44 years in the household population of the United States. The analysis was limited to a cohort of birthing people who reported their last birth as unwanted and who were insured by either Medicaid or private insurance. The survey was analyzed with the application of inverse probability of treatment weights to balance those with Medicaid and those with private insurance in addition to the survey weight. The association between completion of postpartum sterilization and insurance type was evaluated using weighted logistic regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: In an adjusted and inverse probability of treatment weight balanced analysis of a weighted national sample representing 4,164,304 people (416 respondents), Medicaid-insured birthing people with history of unwanted births were found to have 56% lower odds of obtaining postpartum sterilization (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.87; P=.019) than those with private insurance. CONCLUSION: This study adds to mounting evidence that insurance type plays a significant role in the achievement of desired postpartum sterilization, with individuals with Medicaid less likely to undergo the procedure. The findings call for policy reforms around sterilization policy in the United States, emphasizing the need for uniform consent procedures that do not discriminate based on insurance status.
Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Medicaid , Esterilización Reproductiva , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Esterilización Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo no Deseado , Embarazo , Periodo Posparto , Estudios de Cohortes , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Jordanian healthcare system has evolved over the past decades expanding its services, technological, and educational resources. A comprehensive view of this system is lacking. The objective of this report is to describe the structure of the Jordanian healthcare system, the challenges facing it, and the current and recommended health policies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reviewed the current status of the Jordanian healthcare system. The following parameters were analyzed: health indicators, infrastructure, human resources, insurance system, pharmaceutical expense, health education system, and medical tourism. Data were collected from various relevant official institutions and related published literature. RESULTS: Jordan has a young population with a median age of 23.8 years. Life expectancy is 78.8 years for females and 77.0 years for males. The Jordanian healthcare system is divided into three major categories: (1) Governmental Insurance (i.e., the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Royal Medical Services (RMS) and semi-governmental insurance); (2) Private Insurance; and (3) Refugee Insurance, including the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (NHUR). The Governmental Insurance covers 64.30% of the total population. Health expenditure is 6.37% of the gross domestic product (GDP). Pharmaceutical expenses make up 26.6% of the total national healthcare budget. Human resource assessment shows a high ratio of medical staff per 10.000 inhabitants, especially concerning physicians (31.7), dentists (7.9), and pharmacists (15.1). However, the ratio of nursing staff per 10.000 inhabitants is considered low (37.5). The Hospital bed/1000 population ratio is also relatively low (1.4). Healthcare accreditation is implemented through the Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation which was achieved by 7 hospitals and by the National Health Care Accreditation Certificate (HCAC) achieved by 17 hospitals and 42 primary healthcare centers. Postgraduate medical education covers almost all medical and surgical fields. Medical tourism is currently well-established. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the Jordanian healthcare system shows high ratios of physicians, dentists, and pharmacists but a low ratio of nursing staff per 10.000 inhabitants. The hospital bed/1000 population ratio is also relatively low. Pharmaceutical expenses are significantly high and medical tourism is well-developed.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Jordania , Humanos , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Masculino , Femenino , Política de Salud , Turismo Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Conflictos Armados , Adulto , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Efficiency, equity and financial risk protection are key health systems objectives. Equitable distribution of health care is among the priority strategic initiative of the government of Ethiopia. However, data on the distribution of interventions benefits or on disease burden disaggregated by subpopulations to guide health care priority setting is not available in Ethiopia. METHODS: Aligned with policy documents, we identified the following groups to be the worse off in the Ethiopian context: under-five children, women of reproductive age, the poor, and rural residents. We used the Delphi technique by a panel of 28 experts to assign a score for 253 diseases/conditions over a period of two days, in phases. The expert panel represented different institutes and professional mix. Experts assigned a score 1 to 4; where 4 indicates disease/condition predominantly affecting the poor and rural residents and 1 indicates a condition more prevalent among the wealthy and urban residents. Subsequently, the average equity score was computed for each disease/condition. RESULTS: The average scores ranged from 1.11 (for vitiligo) to 3.79 (for obstetric fistula). We standardized the scores to be bounded between 1 and 2; 1 the lowest equity score and 2 the highest equity score. The scores for each disease/condition were then assigned to their corresponding interventions. We used these equity scores to adjust the CEA values for each of the interventions. To adjust the CEA values for equity, we multiplied the health benefits (the denominator of the cost-effectiveness value) of each intervention by the corresponding equity scores, resulting in equity adjusted CEA values. The equity adjusted CEA was then used to rank the interventions using a league table. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi method can be useful in generating equity scores for prioritizing health interventions where disaggregated data on the distribution of diseases or access to interventions by subpopulation groups are not available.
Asunto(s)
Técnica Delphi , Seguro de Salud , Humanos , Etiopía , Femenino , Seguro de Salud/economía , Población Rural , Equidad en Salud , Pobreza , Beneficios del Seguro , MasculinoRESUMEN
Background: Achieving universal health insurance coverage has become a fundamental policy for improving the accessibility and equity of healthcare services. China's Urban-Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URRBMI) is a crucial component of the social security system, aimed at promoting social equity and enhancing public welfare. However, the effectiveness of this policy in improving rural residents' social fairness perceptions (SFP) remains to be tested. Objective: To examine the impact of the urban-rural resident basic medical insurance (URRBMI) on rural residents' social fairness perception (SFP) in China. Methods and samples: The study utilizes city-level and national micro-survey (CGSS) datasets, applying a time-varying difference-in-difference (DID) approach to analyze the equity effects of URRBMI. Excluding urban samples, the final dataset consists of 20,800 rural respondents from 2010, 2011, 2013, and 2015, covering 89 cities. Results: Key findings reveal that URRBMI has a significant negative effect on SFP. The impact varies depending on the integration model and intensifies over time. Additionally, the negative effect shows heterogeneity based on income, age, health, and region. Conclusion: This study highlights the complexities and impacts of integrating China's urban and rural healthcare systems. It provides a detailed understanding of the role of URRBMI in rural China, emphasizing the need for targeted approaches to improve rural residents' perceptions of social fairness. The research offers specific policy recommendations, such as establishing differentiated contribution standards, implementing welfare policies favoring rural residents, and adopting varied reimbursement rates for different diseases.
Asunto(s)
Población Rural , Población Urbana , Humanos , China , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Justicia Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de SaludRESUMEN
In the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces, enrollees must periodically demonstrate their eligibility to receive income-linked health insurance premium subsidies. Marketplaces can verify eligibility using existing records, but only with consumers' consent, which must be renewed at specified times. In a randomized experiment in September 2020, we tested the effect of email nudges reminding consumers to provide consent for verification of their continued eligibility for premium subsidies in California's ACA Marketplace. More than 20,000 households that had applied for subsidies but whose consent for eligibility verification would soon expire were sent one, two, or three emails reminding them to renew consent. Sending three emails increased consent updates by 1.9 percentage points (3.2 percent) and increased receipt of subsidies by 2.0 percentage points (4.0 percent). However, nearly 40 percent of households receiving three emails did not update their consent by the end of the open enrollment period, thus preventing their continued receipt of subsidies. To improve the affordability of Marketplace coverage, new policies and structural changes may be needed to reduce administrative barriers that can inhibit access to subsidies.
Asunto(s)
Correo Electrónico , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Intercambios de Seguro Médico , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , California , Estados Unidos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the key functions and ultimate goals of health systems is to provide financial protection for individuals when using health services. This study sought to evaluate the level of financial protection and its inequality among individuals covered by the Social Security Organization (SSO) health insurance between September and December 2023 in Iran. METHODS: We collected data on 1691 households in five provinces using multistage sampling to examine the prevalence of catastrophic healthcare expenditure (CHE) at four different thresholds (10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%) of the household's capacity to pay (CTP). Additionally, we explored the prevalence of impoverishment due to health costs and assessed socioeconomic-related inequality in OOP payments for healthcare using the concentration index and concentration curve. To measure equity in out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for healthcare, we utilized the Kakwani progressivity index (KPI). Furthermore, we employed multiple logistic regression to identify the main factors contributing to households experiencing CHE. FINDINGS: The study revealed that households in our sample allocated approximately 11% of their budgets to healthcare services. The prevalence of CHE at the thresholds of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% was found to be 47.1%, 30.1%, 20.1%, and 15.7%, respectively. Additionally, we observed that about 7.9% of the households experienced impoverishment due to health costs. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the age of the head of the household, place of residence, socioeconomic status, utilization of dental services, utilization of medicine, and province of residence were the main factors influencing CHE. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that while wealthy households spend more money on healthcare, poorer households spend a larger proportion of their total income to healthcare costs. The KPI showed that households with lower total expenditures had higher OOP payments relative to their CTP. CONCLUSION: The study findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve financial protection in healthcare and mitigate inequalities among individuals covered by SSO. It is recommended that these interventions prioritize the expansion of coverage for dental services and medication expenses, particularly for lower socioeconomic status household.
Asunto(s)
Composición Familiar , Financiación Personal , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Irán , Estudios Transversales , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Enfermedad Catastrófica/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Identifying and exploiting stewardship and financing challenges in Iran's health insurance system as an ecosystem is essential to achieving predetermined goals. This study aimed to determine the challenges and strategies in the Iranian health insurance ecosystem to provide relevant evidence to healthcare managers and policymakers to improve its functions and perform necessary reforms. METHOD: This qualitative study was conducted at the national level in Iran. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the directed content analysis method. The study participants included managers and experts in health insurance and faculty of universities of medical sciences, who were selected by purposive sampling. RESULTS: The challenges and strategies expressed by participants were categorized into two functions: stewardship and financing. Four main themes, ten subthemes, 22 challenges, and 24 strategies were identified in the stewardship function, along with three main themes, 12 subthemes, 17 challenges, and 16 strategies in the financing function. The major challenge in the Iranian health insurance ecosystem was the complexity and conflict of interests between multiple actors with different roles, which led to fragmentation, diverse structures, and a gap between other functions and objectives, hindering the effective functioning of the ecosystem. CONCLUSION: In order to deal with the challenges of the health insurance ecosystem, it is suggested to create a coherent insurance system through a single utility system, and by paying more attention to health-oriented services, the health insurance ecosystem becomes a health-oriented system instead of being treatment-oriented. In addition, in order to strengthen the governance of the country's health insurance ecosystem, the number of actors with multiple roles should be reduced and the roles of the actors should be clarified and separated in order to prevent conflicts of interest and structural corruption in this ecosystem.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Irán , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
Cancer is the top leading cause of death among Latino people. Lack of health insurance is a significant contributor to inadequate cancer detection and treatment. Despite healthcare policy expansions such as the Affordable Care Act, Latino people persistently maintain the highest uninsured rate among any ethnic and racial group in the US, especially among Latino individuals who are immigrants or part of a mixed immigration status household. Recognizing that immigration status is a critical factor in the ability of Latino community members to seek health insurance and access healthcare services, a few US states and the District of Columbia have implemented policies that have expanded coverage to children and adults regardless of immigration status. Expansion of Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status may significantly benefit Latino communities, however the facilitators and barriers to enrolling in these programs need to be evaluated to ensure reach and achieve health equity across the cancer control continuum for all Latinos.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Neoplasias , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/etnología , Medicaid , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Equidad en Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic triggered global health crises, affecting population health directly through infections and fatalities, and indirectly by increasing the burden of chronic diseases due to disrupted healthcare access and altered lifestyle behaviors. Amidst these challenges, concerns regarding reproductive health and fertility rates have emerged, necessitating an understanding of their implications for policymaking and healthcare planning. Furthermore, Kazakhstan's healthcare landscape underwent significant changes with the reintroduction of compulsory social health insurance system in January 2020, coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and compulsory social health insurance system on fertility rates in Kazakhstan by examining live birth data from 2019 to 2024. Methods: Using Interrupted Time Series analysis, we evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown announcement and compulsory social health insurance system implementation on monthly birth rates, adjusted for the number of women of reproductive age from January 2019 to December 2023. Results: In the final model, the coefficients were as follows: the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown was estimated at 469 (SE = 2600, p = 0.8576); the centering variable was estimated at 318 (SE = 222, p = 0.1573), suggesting no significant trend in monthly birth rates over time; the insurance effect was estimated at 7,050 (SE = 2,530, p < 0.01); and the effect of the number of women of reproductive age was estimated at -0.204 (SE = 0.0831, p = 0.01). Discussion: The implementation of the compulsory social health insurance system, rather than the announcement of the COVID-19 lockdown, has had a significant positive impact on live birth rates in Kazakhstan. However, despite governmental efforts, live birth rates are declining, potentially due to unaddressed health needs of fertile women and economic challenges. Urgent policy-level actions are needed to address gaps in healthcare services and promote reproductive health.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Natalidad , COVID-19 , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Nacimiento Vivo , Humanos , Kazajstán/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Tasa de Natalidad/tendencias , Femenino , Adulto , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) are lifelong conditions that can occur in a person with prenatal alcohol exposure. Although studies using intensive, in-person assessments of children in selected communities have found higher estimates of children with FASDs than studies of healthcare claims data, claims-based studies provide more current information about individuals with recognized FASDs from diverse populations. We estimated the proportion of children with administratively reported FASDs in two large healthcare claims databases. METHODS: We analyzed Merative™ MarketScan® commercial and Medicaid claims databases, that include nationwide data from employer-sponsored health plans and from Medicaid programs in 8-10 states, respectively. For each database, we estimated the proportion of children aged 0-17 years with administratively reported FASDs, identified by one inpatient or two outpatient codes for prenatal alcohol exposure or fetal alcohol syndrome during the entire seven-year period from 2015 to 2021 and during each year. RESULTS: During 2015-2021, 1.2 per 10,000 commercially-insured and 6.1 per 10,000 Medicaid-insured children had an administratively reported FASD; estimates varied by sex, geography, and other available demographics. Among commercially-insured children, 0.5 per 10,000 in 2015 and 0.6 per 10,000 children in 2021 had an administratively reported FASD; among Medicaid-insured, 1.2 per 10,000 in 2015 and 2.1 per 10,000 children in 2021 had an administratively reported FASD. CONCLUSIONS: Although an underestimate of the true population of children with FASDs, patterns in administratively reported FASDs by demographics were consistent with previous studies. Healthcare claims studies can provide timely, ongoing information about children with recognized FASDs to complement in-persons studies.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Espectro Alcohólico Fetal , Medicaid , Humanos , Trastornos del Espectro Alcohólico Fetal/epidemiología , Trastornos del Espectro Alcohólico Fetal/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Adolescente , Masculino , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Bases de Datos Factuales , Seguro de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Cognitive impairment and decreased executing functioning represent common symptoms of both ADHD and pregnancy. This study aimed to characterize temporal trends and racial/ethnic disparities in ADHD diagnosis during the perinatal period. METHODS: In this serial cross-sectional study, we used administrative claims to create a cohort of commercially insured women with a documented live birth between 2008 and 2020 and identified those with an ADHD diagnosis in the year before or after delivery. We applied logistic regression to assess the probability of ADHD diagnosis adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and comorbid conditions. We used this model to calculate the predicted probability of ADHD diagnosis by racial/ethnic group for each year. RESULTS: We identified 736,325 deliveries from 2008 to 2020. Overall, 16,801 (2.28 %) of deliveries had an ADHD diagnosis in the year before or after delivery. ADHD rates increased 290 % from 101 (95%CI: 92-111) per 10,000 deliveries in 2008 to 394 (95%CI: 371-419) per 10,000 deliveries in 2020. White women experienced the highest rates followed by Black, Hispanic, and Asian, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ADHD diagnosis rates during the perinatal period may reflect improved detection but racial disparities persist. Additional research is needed to develop equitable outreach strategies to better support women experiencing ADHD during the perinatal period.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/etnología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etnología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Opioid use disorder (OUD) significantly impacts individual and public health and exacerbated further by concurrent infectious diseases. A syndemic approach is needed to address the intertwined OUD, HIV, and HCV epidemics, including the expanded use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). METHODS: To identify MOUD scale-up opportunities, we conducted a retrospective cohort study, representing commercially insured persons, and created the OUD care continuum, including HIV and HCV influences in adults (18-64 years) newly diagnosed with OUD in 2019 using Merative MarketSan data. RESULTS: Among 124,467,633 individuals, the prevalence of OUD was 0.4 % (95 % CI: 0.36 %-0.46 %; N = 497,871), with 327,277 (65.7 %, 95 % CI: 65.60 %-65.87 %) newly diagnosed in 2019. Among these newly diagnosed individuals (54 % men, mean age 44±0.01), 53,568 (27.0 %, 95 % CI: 26.4 %-27.5 %) were prescribed MOUD, with retention rates at 1, 3, and 6 months being 89.0 % (95 % CI: 88.2 %-89.8 %), 66.0 % (95 % CI: 64.8 %-67.2 %), and 50.3 % (95 % CI: 48.3 %-51.6 %), respectively. Buprenorphine was the most prescribed MOUD (79.6 %, 95 % CI: 78.6 %-80.7 %), followed by XR-NTX (14.9 %, 95 % CI:14.0 %-15.8 %) and methadone (5.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.9 %-6.1 %). Six-month retention was highest for methadone (73.4 %, 95 % CI: 73.0 %-73.8 %), however, followed by buprenorphine (55.7 %, 95 % CI: 55.3 %-57.1 %) and substantially lower for XR-NTX (12.6 %, 95 % CI: 10.6 %-14.6 %). Screening for HIV and HCV was low among OUD enrollees (11.1 %, 14.4 %), slightly higher for MOUD initiators (18.0 %, 21.6 %). Being prescribed MOUD was correlated with HCV infection (AOR: 2.54; 95 % CI: 2.41-2.68), HCV/HIV coinfection (AOR: 1.89; 95 % CI: 1.41-2.53), and hospitalization for OUD-related services (AOR: 1.14; 95 % CI: 1.11-1.17), yet hospitalization for OUD-related services was positively correlated with XR-NTX (AOR: 2.72; 95 % CI: 2.56-2.85) prescription and negatively with methadone (AOR: 0.19; 95 % CI: 0.16-0.23) prescription. Having HIV was negatively correlated with being prescribed methadone (AOR: 0.33; 95 % CI: 0.13-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial gaps in the OUD cascade persist, underscoring better implementation opportunities for MOUD prescription in hospital-based settings and expanding access to methadone beyond highly regulated sites given its low coverage yet high treatment retention.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis C , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Comorbilidad , Seguro de Salud , Estudios de Cohortes , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Peru has a fragmented health insurance system in which most insureds can only access the providers in their insurer's network. The two largest sub-systems covered about 53% and 30% of the population at the start of the pandemic; however, some individuals have dual insurance and can thereby access both sets of providers. We use data on 24.7 million individuals who belonged to one or both sub-systems to investigate the effect of dual insurance on COVID-19 mortality. We estimate recursive bivariate probit models using the difference in the distance to the nearest hospital in the two insurance sub-systems as Instrumental Variable. The effect of dual insurance was to reduce COVID-19 mortality risk by 0.23% compared with the sample mean risk of 0.54%. This implies that the 133,128 COVID-19 deaths in the sample would have been reduced by 56,418 (95%CI: 34,894, 78,069) if all individuals in the sample had dual insurance.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Seguro de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , Perú/epidemiología , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Pandemias/economía , Anciano , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various features in health insurance schemes may lead to variation in healthcare. Unwarranted variations raise concerns about suboptimal quality of care, differing treatments for similar needs, or unnecessary financial burdens on patients and health systems. This realist review aims to explore insurance features that may contribute to healthcare variation in Asian countries; and to understand influencing mechanisms and contexts. METHODS: We undertook a realist review. First, we developed an initial theory. Second, we conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature in Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science to produce a middle range theory for Asian countries. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Finally, we tested the theory in Thailand by interviewing nine experts, and further refined the theory. RESULTS: Our systematic search identified 14 empirical studies. We produced a middle range theory in a context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMOc) which presented seven insurance features: benefit package, cost-sharing policies, beneficiaries, contracted providers, provider payment methods, budget size, and administration and management, that influenced variation through 20 interlinked demand- and supply-side mechanisms. The refined theory for Thailand added eight mechanisms and discarded six mechanisms irrelevant to the local context. CONCLUSION: Our middle range and refined theories provide information about health insurance features associated with healthcare variation. We encourage policy-makers and researchers to test the CMOc in their specific contexts. Appropriately validated, it can help design interventions in health insurance schemes to prevent or mitigate the detrimental effects of unwarranted healthcare variation.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Tailandia , Humanos , Atención a la Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In this study, the impact of medical insurance and old-age security on the use of medical services by the older population with disabilities is analyzed. A reference for decision makers is provided to improve medical and old-age security policies and enhance the use of medical services by the older population. METHODS: Data were drawn from 3,737 older people with disabilities aged 65 years or above from the 2018 China Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. A two-part model based on social ecological theory was used for both analysis and group prediction. RESULTS: In terms of the use of outpatient medical services, old-age pension significantly increased the probability of outpatient visits for this population group (P < 0.05). Urban employee/resident medical insurance, the new rural cooperative medical insurance, and retirement pension significantly affected medical expenses. In terms of the use of inpatient medical services, the new rural cooperative medical insurance and retirement pension significantly influenced the choice of inpatient medical services; retirement pension increased inpatient medical expenditure (p < 0.01). The expected average probability of hospitalization, unconditional expected cost, and conditional expected cost for the older population with disabilities were 49.5%, RMB 6629.31, and RMB 3281.51, respectively. Both conditional and unconditional expected costs were significantly higher for older people with disabilities with the following attributes: male, married, no less than three chronic conditions, and unassisted daily care; costs were lower for older people with disabilities who are female, not married, had less than three chronic conditions, and had a spouse, child, or other caregiver. CONCLUSION: Medical insurance and old-age security can significantly promote the utilization of medical services by the older population with disabilities. It is therefore recommended to focus on strengthening the support and health management of these people who are unattended to improve the effective use of health services and better meet their needs.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Seguro de Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , China , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Longitudinales , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistencia a los Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Air pollution affects residents' health to varying extents according to differences in socioeconomic status. However, there has been a lack of research on whether air pollution contributes to unfair health costs. METHODS: In this research, data from the China Labour Force Dynamics Survey are matched with data on PM2.5 average concentration and precipitation, and the influence of air pollution on the health expenditures of residents is analysed with econometric methods involving a two-part model, instrument variables and moderating effects. RESULTS: The findings reveal that air pollution significantly impacts Chinese residents' health costs and leads to low-income people face health inequality. Specifcally, the empirical evidence shows that air pollution has no significant influence on the probability of residents' health costs (ß = 0.021, p = 0.770) but that it increases the amount of residents' total outpatient costs (ß = 0.379, p < 0.006), reimbursed outpatient cost (ß = 0.453, p < 0.044) and out-of-pocket outpatient cost (ß = 0.362, p < 0.048). The heterogeneity analysis of income indicates that low-income people face inequality due to health cost inflation caused by air pollution, their total and out-of-pocket outpatient cost significantly increase with PM2.5 (ß = 0.417, p = 0.013; ß = 0.491, p = 0.020). Further analysis reveals that social basic medical insurance does not have a remarkable positive moderating effect on the influence of air pollution on individual health inflation (ß = 0.021, p = 0.292), but supplementary medical insurance for employees could reduce the effect of air pollution on low-income residents' reimbursed and out-of-pocket outpatient cost (ß=-1.331, p = 0.096; ß=-2.211, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The study concludes that air pollution increases the amount of Chinese residents' outpatient cost and has no significant effect on the incidence of outpatient cost. However, air pollution has more significant impact on the low-income residents than the high-income residents, which indicates that air pollution leads to the inequity of medical cost. Additionally, the supplementary medical insurance reduces the inequity of medical cost caused by air pollution for the low-income employees.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire , Gastos en Salud , Seguro de Salud , Humanos , China , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The costs associated with healthcare are of critical importance to both decision-makers and users, given the limited resources allocated to the health sector. However, the available scientific evidence on healthcare costs in low- and middle-income countries, such as Peru, is scarce. In the Peruvian context, the health system is fragmented, and the private health insurance and its financing models have received less research attention. We aimed to analyse user cost-sharing and associated factors within the private healthcare system. METHODS: Our study was cross-sectional, using open data from the Electronic Transaction Model of Standardized Billing Data-TEDEF-SUSALUD, between 2021-2022. Our unit of analysis is the user's medical bills. We considered the total amount of cost-sharing, proportion of total payments as cost-sharing, and cost-sharing as a proportion of minimum salaries. We use a multiple regression model to perform the analyses. RESULTS: Our study included 5,286,556 health services provided to users of the private health insurance in Peru. We found a significant difference was observed in the cost-sharing for hospitalization-related services, with an average of 419.64 soles per day (95% CI: 413.44 to 425.85). Also, we identified that for hospitalization-related services per day is, on average, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.41) minimum salaries more expensive than outpatient care, although cost-sharing per day of hospitalization represent on average only 14% of the total amount submitted. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a detailed overview of cost-sharing in the private healthcare system in Peru and the factors associated with them. Policymakers can use the study's finding that higher cost-sharing for inpatient hospitalization compared to outpatient care in private insurance can create inequities in access to healthcare to design policies aimed at reducing these costs and promoting a more equitable and accessible healthcare system in Peru.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Atención a la Salud , Seguro de Salud , Perú , Humanos , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/economía , Estudios Transversales , Seguro de Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Sector Privado/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Many US children and adolescents with mental and behavioral health (MBH) conditions do not access MBH services. One contributing factor is limited insurance coverage, which is influenced by state MBH insurance parity legislation. Objective: To investigate the association of patient-level factors and the comprehensiveness of state MBH insurance legislation with perceived poor access to MBH care and perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage for US children and adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using responses by caregivers of children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years with MBH conditions in the National Survey of Children's Health and State Mental Health Insurance Laws Dataset from 2016 to 2019. Data analyses were conducted from May 2022 to January 2024. Exposure: MBH insurance legislation comprehensiveness defined by State Mental Health Insurance Laws Dataset (SMHILD) scores (range, 0-7). Main Outcomes and Measures: Perceived poor access to MBH care and perceived inadequacy of MBH insurance were assessed. Multivariable regression models adjusted for individual-level characteristics. Results: There were 29â¯876 caregivers of children and adolescents with MBH conditions during the study period representing 14â¯292â¯300 youths nationally (7â¯816â¯727 aged 12-17 years [54.7%]; 8â¯455â¯171 male [59.2%]; 292â¯543 Asian [2.0%], 2â¯076â¯442 Black [14.5%], and 9â¯942â¯088 White [69.6%%]; 3â¯202â¯525 Hispanic [22.4%]). A total of 3193 caregivers representing 1â¯770â¯492 children and adolescents (12.4%) perceived poor access to MBH care, and 3517 caregivers representing 1â¯643â¯260 of 13â¯175â¯295 children and adolescents (12.5%) perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage. In multivariable models, there were higher odds of perceived poor access to MBH care among caregivers of Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.75) and Asian (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.01-2.84) compared with White children and adolescents. As exposures to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) increased, the odds of perceived poor access to MBH care increased (aORs ranged from 1.68; 95%, CI 1.32-2.13 for 1 ACE to 4.28; 95% CI, 3.17-5.77 for ≥4 ACEs compared with no ACEs). Compared with living in states with the least comprehensive MBH insurance legislation (SMHILD score, 0-2), living in states with the most comprehensive legislation (SMHILD score, 5-7) was associated with lower odds of perceived poor access to MBH care (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99), while living in states with moderately comprehensive legislation (score, 4) was associated with higher odds of perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.49). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, living in states with the most comprehensive MBH insurance legislation was associated with lower odds of perceived poor access to MBH care among caregivers for children and adolescents with MBH conditions. This finding suggests that advocacy for comprehensive mental health parity legislation may promote improved child and adolescent access to MBH services.