RESUMEN
Many psychological factors may have a significant bearing on an individual's oral health and success of dental treatments. Overall, these factors may result in the avoidance of dental visits, emergency-based dental appointments, noncompliant dental behavior, the utilization of multiple oral health care providers, and poor oral health. These factors may affect the quality of life of individuals and may lead to patient dissatisfaction, poor prognosis, and failure of dental treatment. Multiple psychological factors may affect the dentist and the patient. Those factors may alter the prognosis for successful dental treatment. Physician empathy is fundamental in developing long-term physician-patient trust.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica , Relaciones Dentista-Paciente , Humanos , Pronóstico , Atención Odontológica/psicología , Salud Bucal , Calidad de Vida , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Empatía , ConfianzaRESUMEN
Introduction: childbirth experiences are women´s personal feelings and interpretations of birth processes, which could be difficult to describe and explain. The outbreak of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) instilled tension and worries in all Nigerian citizens and could also affect the birth experiences and satisfaction of women. Thus, this study explored the experiences of childbirth and satisfaction with birth among women in selected Nigerian healthcare facilities during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: the study adopted a concurrent triangulation mixed method design, which utilized an in-depth interview and questionnaire to obtain different but complementary data. Sample sizes of 304 and 15 women were recruited for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Analysis was done using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis. Results: the majority of the participants perceived childbirth to be labor and delivery (3.66 ± 3.16); participants were mostly satisfied with reception received from staff (2.35 ± 2.29) and respecting their privacy (2.04 ± 1.52). Five (5) themes and 18 subthemes emerged from qualitative data. The themes were: understanding of childbirth, satisfaction with care, hospital experiences, unique experiences during birth, and social support. Conclusion: women had more positive and less negative but unique childbirth experiences. The majority expressed satisfaction within the care given by qualified and competent health workers, despite the challenges posed by COVID-19 pandemic. The provision of physical and emotional support by intimate partners, midwives´ and family members during delivery had a significant influence on maternal satisfaction with the entire birth experience.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Parto Obstétrico , Parto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Apoyo Social , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Nigeria , Embarazo , Adulto , Parto/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Instituciones de Salud , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Entrevistas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort. METHODS: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: All patients in the study successfully completed the gastroscopy. The satisfaction of patients in Group C-E was significantly higher than that in Group P (Pâ <â .05), but there was no statistical significance in the patient satisfaction among the other groups. Compared with Group P, the incidence of injection pain in Groups C and C-E significantly decreased (Pâ <â .05). There were no significant differences in the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR, and SpO2 among the 4 groups (Pâ >â .05). The awakening time of Group C was significantly longer than that of Groups P and P-E (Pâ <â .05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the awakening time of other groups. CONCLUSION: Ciprofol demonstrated efficacy in inducing sedation or anesthesia during painless gastroscopy that was similar to propofol, while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. Moreover, the combination of propofol and etomidate, as well as the combination of ciprofol and etomidate, were both shown to be equally safe and effective for this clinical application. These findings suggest that ciprofol can be considered as a safe and effective alternative for painless gastroscopy, and the ciprofol-etomidate mixture may be a better choice.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Intravenosos , Etomidato , Gastroscopía , Propofol , Humanos , Propofol/efectos adversos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Etomidato/efectos adversos , Etomidato/administración & dosificación , Gastroscopía/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patient perception of quality of care is an essential component in evaluating healthcare delivery. This article reports data from primary health care (PHC) centers before Greece's most recent PHC reform. The study was undertaken to offer some baseline information about patient experience, support the decision-making processes taking place, and provide valuable input for future policy-making comparisons in Greece. METHODS: The research was conducted across the 16 PHC centers of Epirus, a region of north-western Greece, from June to September 2017, with 532 patients rating the importance of different aspects of three main healthcare domains (clinical behavior, support and services, and organization of care) of PHC provision. The Greek version of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP) questionnaire was implemented for research purposes. Univariate comparisons were performed for patients with and without chronic disease, using Pearson's χ2 test for categorical data. RESULTS: Study findings support that the organization of care domain is of highest importance and priority, with clinical behavior and support and services following closely. Among recruited patients, on average, only 2.1% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied (rated 4 or 5 on the Likert scale) with the organization of care aspects under consideration, compared to 18.4% of patients without a chronic disease. Furthermore, only 4% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied with the aspects examined in the clinical behavior domain, compared to 27% of patients without a chronic disease. Finally, 18% of sampled patients with a chronic disease reported being satisfied with the quality of support and services provided, compared to 38% of patients without a chronic disease. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to back up available past information to afterwards estimate reform imprinting on expectations and perceptions. The items and aspects of EUROPEP, in line with the new tasks of the personal doctor within the PHC system that patients perceive as most essential, can be used to prioritize quality improvement activities to strengthen PHC delivery in Greece. Communication skills, practices, and behavioral change skills seem to need more attention for an efficient PHC model.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Grecia , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Masculino , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , PercepciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and aberrometric outcomes obtained with a new diffractive pentafocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a diffractive trifocal IOL. METHODS: Patients bilaterally implanted with the pentafocal Intensity SeeLens IOL (Hanita Lenses) (n = 30) and the trifocal FineVision POD F IOL (PhysIOL) (n = 30) during cataract surgery were studied after 1 month for refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, Hartmann-Shack aberration, and double-pass aberration. The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire was used to evaluate visual comfort. RESULTS: Distance and near visual acuities were similar with the two IOLs, but distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity was better with the Intensity IOLs (0.03 ± 0.04 vs 0.11 ± 0.04 logMAR in the FineVision eyes, P < .01). The difference between objective and subjective refraction was more myopic for the Intensity IOL (-1.15 vs -0.29 diopters [D]). The defocus curve was flatter with the Intensity IOL. Contrast sensitivity was similar in both IOLs. Hartmann-Shack aberration and double-pass aberration were similar, but the modulation transfer function cut-off value was worse with the Intensity IOL: 11.6 ± 2.7 vs 15.3 ± 4.9 (P < .01). QoV scores were better with the Intensity IOL, in particular for glare, halos, and starburst. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative series, the pentafocal Intensity IOL provided better intermediate vision and better defocus curve than the FineVision IOL, with comparable distance and near vision. The optical disturbances as reported by the patients were higher with the FineVision IOL. Additional studies will better define the aberration profile obtained with the pentafocal IOL. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e604-e613.].
Asunto(s)
Sensibilidad de Contraste , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Lentes Intraoculares Multifocales , Facoemulsificación , Diseño de Prótesis , Seudofaquia , Refracción Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Sensibilidad de Contraste/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Seudofaquia/fisiopatología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios Prospectivos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Aberrometría , Lentes Intraoculares , Aberración de Frente de Onda Corneal/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
GOAL: The U.S. hospital sector is experiencing record levels of integration, with more than half of U.S. physicians and nearly three quarters of all hospitals affiliated with one of slightly more than 630 health systems. However, there is growing evidence to suggest that health system integration is associated with more expensive and lower quality care. The goal of this research is to explore the associations between forms of health system integration and hospital patient experience scores. METHODS: A cross-section of data for the year 2019 was assembled and analyzed from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient experience survey. Data from the Compendium of US Health Systems, published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey were used to obtain independent variables and hospital-level covariates. A series of multivariable regressions was used to explore the associations between forms of health system integration and hospital patient experience scores across three domains: overall impression of the hospital; experiences with staff; and the hospital environment. Forms of both horizontal integration (i.e., number of hospitals owned by hospital-based health systems) and vertical integration (i.e., physician-hospital integration, nursing home ownership, accountable care organization [ACO] participation, group purchasing, contract management, offering insurance products, and investor ownership) were explored. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Although horizontal integration was not associated with any meaningful differences in patient experience scores, health systems with physician-hospital integration were associated with overall impression scores that were 2 percentage points higher than systems without physician integration. Similarly, contract management and membership in a group purchasing organization were associated with overall impression and environment scores that were 2 to 3 percentage points higher than hospitals that did not engage in those forms of integration. By contrast, investor ownership was associated with a 5% lower score for overall patient experience compared with other forms of ownership. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The findings of this study suggest that hospitals in more vertically integrated systems may have higher patient experience scores than independent hospitals and those that belong exclusively to horizontally integrated systems. Thus, there are elements of vertical integration that could benefit patients and be worth pursuing. Conversely, higher degrees of horizontal integration in the form of multihospital ownership may not be of any benefit to patients and should be pursued with caution.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Masculino , Femenino , HospitalesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The integration of Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) alongside traditional clinical outcomes is crucial for improving quality of care. Although PREMs are frequently measured in inpatient treatment settings, they are rarely employed in digitally supported care processes or longitudinal assessment of care pathways. METHODS: To gain an overview of PREMs used to cover patients' experiences with digitally supported care processes in heart failure (HF), a scoping review was conducted in Medline. RESULTS: Out of 538 publications, 29 were identified that focus on PREMs in digitally supported care processes across 9 unspecific and 14 disease-specific groups, with 5 manuscripts focusing on HF. PREMs were mostly assessed using self-developed, study-specific questionnaires lacking standardization and validity. In total, 9 PREM dimensions and 25 sub-dimensions were identified. This included care delivery, privacy, physician-patient relationship, involvement, administration, information, knowledge, technology, and experiences in general. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the relevance of different dimensions assessed depends largely on the type of care rather than the underlying chronic disease.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Central neuropathic pain resulting from spinal cord injury is notoriously debilitating and difficult to treat with few currently available treatments. A novel molecule with intrathecal administration: Ziconotide has been approved for treatment of refractory neuropathic pain in general. It acts as a presynaptic calcium channel blocker. A pilot study has shown its potential in SCI neuropathic pain patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the long-term (6 months) efficacy of chronic intrathecal ziconotide for the treatment of neuropathic SCI pain. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative, Placebo controlled, Double blind clinical trial, with a crossover of random alternated periods of 6 months (placebo or ITZ) for a total of 15 months including a total of 44 patients. STUDY POPULATION: ⢠Patients with SCI of various etiologies exhibiting neuropathic pain refractory to non-invasive treatments. ⢠> 18 years. INTERVENTION: Intrathecal administration of ziconotide via an implanted pump. STUDY OUTCOMES: Primary study outcome Difference in pain intensity for all patients between effective treatment and placebo periods. Secondary study outcomes 1. Continuous evaluation of pain intensity. 2. Percentage of patients with at least 30% of pain reduction. 3. Satisfaction level of the patient pain relief. 4. Declarations of serious adverse events. 5. Duration and intensity of spontaneous and provoked pain. 6. Quality of life. 7. Patient global impression of change. 8. Quantification of daily dosages of analgesic drug intake. 9. Long term memory and neurocognitive effects. 10. Assessment of the patient's physical and emotional distress. NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE BURDEN AND RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PARTICIPATION, BENEFIT, AND GROUP RELATEDNESS: Participation in this study is in accordance with current treatment protocols for SCI neuropathic pain in France therefore it proposes a treatment that would currently be considered regular practice even though no RCT evidence is yet available. The study gives patients the advantage of directly testing versus placebo a treatment that otherwise entails significant constraints. A Data Safety Monitoring board (DSMB) will be created for continuous safety analysis. Furthermore, patients will be followed in specialized pain centers offering the possibility of continuing their treatment after the study period.
Asunto(s)
Estudios Cruzados , Inyecciones Espinales , Neuralgia , Dimensión del Dolor , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , omega-Conotoxinas , Humanos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/etiología , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , omega-Conotoxinas/administración & dosificación , omega-Conotoxinas/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medication Treatment Satisfaction (M-TS) from the patients' perspective is important for comprehensively evaluating the effect of medicines. The extent to which current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for M-TS are valid, reliable, responsive, and interpretable remains unclear. To assess the measurement properties of existing PROMs for M-TS and to highlight research gaps. METHODS: Using PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane library (Ovid), IPA (Ovid), PsycINFO, Patient-Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Questionnaires biomedical databases, and four Chinese databases, we performed a systematic search for studies addressing the development and validation of PROMs for M-TS. Based on the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline, pairs of reviewers independently assessed the measurement properties of the PROMs and rated the quality of evidence on the measurement properties of each PROM. (The Open Science Framework registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8S5ZM ). RESULTS: This review identified 69 PROMs for M-TS in 114 studies (four generic, 32 disease-specific, and 33 drug-specific) of which 60 were intended for adults. All provided limited or no information regarding interpretability. Most demonstrated appropriate construct validity including convergent validity (39/69) and discriminative or known-groups validity (40/69) (high to moderate quality of evidence). Only a few provided evidence of sufficient content validity (8/69), structural validity (13/69), and internal consistency (11/69). Of 38 PROMs reporting test-retest reliability, results in 24 provided evidence of satisfactory test-retest reliability (18 with high to moderate, 6 with low to very low quality of evidence). Few PROMs reported responsiveness (16/69). Two generic PROMs (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication initial Version 1.4, TSQM-1.4; Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire, SATMED-Q) and one drug-specific PROM (Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, ITSQ) demonstrated both satisfactory validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Most existing PROMs for M-TS require further exploration of measurement properties. Reporting guidelines are needed to enhance the reporting quality of the development and validation of PROMs for M-TS.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The emergence of horizontal neck wrinkles is increasingly becoming a focal point for both cosmetic professionals and clients. Various treatment approaches must be considered to address this issue effectively, owing to its diverse underlying causes. The study explores the potential of utilizing the Endolift laser in conjunction with nanofat injection as a viable treatment option. METHODS: Twenty patients with horizontal neck wrinkles involved in the study. Ten patients underwent treatment with a combination of Endolift laser and nanofat injection and 10 patients treated with nanofat injection alone. The participants were monitored for 6 months post-treatment. Biometric measurements were utilized to assess outcomes, including changes in volume, depth, and area of the wrinkles, skin elasticity, as well as the diameter and density of the epidermis and dermis in the treated area. Skin improvement was evaluated by two independent dermatologists, who compared before and after photos in a blinded manner. Patient satisfaction levels were also documented. RESULTS: The Visioface analysis showed a notable decrease in neck wrinkle depth and area in both groups. However, the group receiving the combination treatment of Endolift laser and nanofat exhibited a significantly greater improvement compared to the group treated with nanofat alone. Skin ultrasonography results demonstrated an increase in thickness and density of the dermis and epidermis in both groups. Particularly, the group treated with Endolift laser-nanofat displayed significant enhancements in dermis and epidermis density and thickness when contrasted with the nanofat-only group. Analysis with Cutometer revealed a marked enhancement in skin elasticity in the Endolift-nanofat treated group in comparison to the nanofat-only treated group. Furthermore, in the Endolift-nanofat treated group, a substantial majority (90%) of patients exhibited improvement. Patient evaluations highlighted significant distinctions between the two groups, with 95% of patients in the Endolift-nanofat treated group demonstrating enhancement. CONCLUSION: Both methods notably enhance horizontal neck wrinkles; nevertheless, the combination of endolift laser and nanofat seems to be more efficient for treating horizontal neck wrinkles.
Asunto(s)
Cuello , Envejecimiento de la Piel , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Adulto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Terapia por Láser/instrumentación , Masculino , Tejido Adiposo/diagnóstico por imagen , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris poses a significant dermatological challenge, necessitating alternative treatments due to limitations and side effects associated with current therapies. This pilot clinical trial investigated the feasibility and efficacy of precision cryotherapy for acne vulgaris. METHODS: A total of 20 volunteers underwent targeted precision cryotherapy using a carbon dioxide-based device. Treatment outcomes were assessed using various parameters, including Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score, acne lesion count, erythema index (EI), global evaluation score, and participant satisfaction. Safety monitoring included adverse event reporting and physical examination. RESULTS: Precision cryotherapy demonstrated a significant reduction (90.25%) in the acne lesion count by week 4, with clinical improvement indicated by IGA score reduction (p < 0.001). The EI showed notable improvements at weeks 1, 2, and 4. The global evaluation score demonstrated a 75%-100% clinical improvement at Visit 4. Participants reported high satisfaction (6.75 ± 0.79) with the procedure. No adverse event or discomfort was reported. CONCLUSION: Precision cryotherapy effectively improved acne lesions, which was safe and satisfactory for participants. These findings suggest its potential as an alternative therapeutic modality, especially for populations with limited treatment options. Further research is needed to validate the results and explore underlying mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Crioterapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/terapia , Crioterapia/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Estudios de FactibilidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypertension management apps (HMAs) can be effective in controlling blood pressure, but their actual impact is often suboptimal. Establishing a user satisfaction evaluation indicator system for HMAs can assist app developers in enhancing app design and functionality, while also helping users identify apps that best meet their needs. This approach aims to improve the overall effectiveness of app usage. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically collect data on HMAs and their user reviews in the United States and China. It analyzes app usage patterns and functional characteristics, identifies factors influencing user satisfaction from existing research, and develops a satisfaction evaluation indicator system to provide more accurate recommendations for improving user satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive statistical analysis to assess the development status of HMAs in both countries and applied the task-technology fit model to evaluate whether the app functionalities align with business needs. We separately summarized the factors influencing user satisfaction in both countries from previous research, utilized the analytic hierarchy process to develop an evaluation indicator system for HMA user satisfaction, and calculated satisfaction levels. Based on these findings, we propose improvements to enhance app functionality and user satisfaction. RESULTS: In terms of current development status, there were fewer HMAs and user reviews in China compared with the United States. Regarding app functional availability, fewer than 5% (4/91) of the apps achieved a demand fulfillment rate exceeding 80% (8/10). Overall, user satisfaction in both countries was low. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, user satisfaction was lowest for advertising distribution, data synchronization, and reliability. By contrast, Chinese apps need improvements in cost efficiency and compatibility.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Aplicaciones Móviles , Humanos , Hipertensión/terapia , China , Estados Unidos , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke may lead to various disabilities, and a structured follow-up visit is strongly recommended within a few months after an event. To facilitate this visit, the digital previsit tool "Strokehealth" was developed for patients to fill out in advance. The concept Strokehälsa (or Strokehealth) was initially developed in-house as a Windows application, later incorporated in 1177.se. OBJECTIVE: The study's primary objective was to use a patient satisfaction survey to evaluate the digital previsit tool Strokehealth when used before a follow-up visit, with a focus on feasibility and relevance from the perspective of people with stroke. Our secondary objective was to explore the extent to which the previsit tool identified stroke-related health problems. METHODS: Between November 2020 and June 2021, a web-based survey was sent to patients who were scheduled for a follow-up visit after discharge from a stroke unit and had recently filled in the previsit tool. The survey covered demographic characteristics, internet habits, and satisfaction rated using 5 response options. Descriptive statistics were used to present data from both the previsit tool and the survey. We also compared the characteristics of those who completed the previsit tool and those who did not, using nonparametric statistics. Free-text responses were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: All patients filling out the previsit tool (80/171; age: median 67, range 32-91 years) were community-dwelling. Most had experienced a mild stroke and reported a median of 2 stroke-related health problems (range 0-8), and they were significantly younger than nonresponders (P<.001). The survey evaluating the previsit tool was completed by 73% (58/80; 39 men). The majority (48/58, 83%) reported using the internet daily. Most respondents (56/58, 97%) were either satisfied (n=15) or very satisfied (n=41) with how well the previsit tool captured their health problems. The highest level of dissatisfaction was related to the response options in Strokehealth (n=5). Based on the free-text answers to the survey, we developed 4 themes. First, Strokehealth was perceived to provide a structure that ensured that issues would be emphasized and considered. Second, user-friendliness and accessibility were viewed as acceptable, although respondents suggested improvements. Third, participants raised awareness about being approached digitally for communication and highlighted the importance of how to be approached. Fourth, their experiences with Strokehealth were influenced by their perceptions of the explanatory texts, the response options, and the possibility of elaborating on their answers in free text. CONCLUSIONS: People with stroke considered the freely available previsit tool Strokehealth feasible for preparing in advance for a follow-up visit. Despite high satisfaction with how well the tool captured their health problems, participants indicated that additional free-text responses and revised information could enhance usability. Improvements need to be considered in parallel with qualitative data to ensure that the tool meets patient needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Researchweb 275135; https://www.researchweb.org/is/vgr/project/275135.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the awareness, experiences, and beliefs of individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) regarding their healthcare management, along with assessing their overall satisfaction levels. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Italy, Sweden, and Russia, rigorously developed based on OA international guidelines in collaboration with healthcare professionals and individuals with OA. Participants over 40 years of age with self-reported hip and/or knee OA were eligible. The analytical framework included descriptive analysis (assessment of awareness levels for 'recommended', 'optional', and 'not recommended' treatments), analysis of suggested treatments and taken treatments, exploration of beliefs, barriers and satisfaction analysis (0-100 scale). RESULTS: A total of 401 participants (mean age: 59.7, 78.3% female, 28% Italian, 49% Swedish, 23% Russian) contributed to the study. In Sweden, 57%-72% accurately identified recommended treatments, while in Russia, the range was 34%-91%, and in Italy, it was 35%-73%. The predominant suggested and taken treatments were oral anti-inflammatory drugs in Italy (87/81%) and Russia (97/97%) and specific exercise in Sweden (84/79%). Notably, only Sweden reached a consensus on the effectiveness of exercise for everyone, while Russia and Italy insisted on radiographic findings as a prerequisite for exercise. Mean satisfaction levels were 59.7 (Italy), 47.4 (Sweden), and 35.2 (Russia). CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered variations in awareness, treatment preferences, and beliefs among the three countries, underscoring the necessity for tailored education on OA management that accounts for regional differences across Europe.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suecia , Anciano , Italia , Federación de Rusia , Osteoartritis/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Adulto , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/terapiaRESUMEN
Gynecomastia is a benign glandular proliferation that can affect adolescents causing significant psychological discomfort. Generally, it is idiopathic but underlying endocrinological conditions must be excluded. Different surgical techniques are available, the surgical correction with subareolar incision achieves the goal of satisfactory aesthetic result for patients. We studied all patients treated for gynecomastia in two centers of pediatric surgery. After collection of a detailed family history, we evaluated the presence of early onset of puberty, congenital abnormalities of the external genitalia, use of drugs, eating habits and the presence of genetic disorders. Laboratory tests and ultrasound were made to exclude endocrinological disorders. The surgical treatment was performed by a subareolar incision with gland and adipose tissue excision. A Body - Q chest module to evaluate patient satisfaction has been proposed to everyone before and after surgery. 47 adolescents with median age of 15 years were surgically treated. Three presented endocrinological disorders. Grade of gynecomastia for surgery was: III in 40 patients and IIb in 7 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients. The Body - Q chest module was completed by 42 patients and showed good results for all points analyzed, except for social feelings. Gynecomastia in adolescents can be surgically treated with subareolar incision, reporting good aesthetic results and low incidence of complications. Specific tests are useful to assess patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Ginecomastia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Ginecomastia/cirugía , Masculino , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mamoplastia/métodos , NiñoRESUMEN
Importance: Emergency department (ED) boarding times have increased rapidly, but their health equity outcomes are unknown. Objective: To investigate whether prolonged ED boarding is associated with increased perceived racial discrimination and dissatisfaction and whether associations vary between patients from marginalized racial and ethnic groups vs non-Hispanic White patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cross-sectional study of hospitalized adults who boarded in the ED during internal medicine admissions at a large, urban hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, from June 2023 to January 2024. Equal proportions of non-Hispanic White patients and patients from marginalized racial and ethnic groups (American Indian or Alaska Native, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black and/or African American, and multiracial) were selected randomly. Exposure: The duration of ED boarding was categorized as less than 4 hours (reference), 4 to less than 24 hours, and 24 or more hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were odds of reporting (1) discrimination via the Discrimination in Medical Settings scale, and (2) dissatisfaction via the adapted Picker Patient Experience-15 questionnaire. Marginalized race and ethnicity was tested as an effect modifier. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient age, sex, language, and insurance payer. Results: Of 598 patients approached, 527 were enrolled, and 525 completed the surveys (response rate, 87.8%). The mean age (SD) was 60.6 (18.7) years, 300 patients (57.1%) were female, 246 patients (47.3%) identified as non-Hispanic White, and 274 (52.7%) were from a marginalized racial or ethnic group. In total, 135 (25.7%) boarded less than 4 hours (reference), 202 (38.5%) boarded 4 to less than 24 hours, and 188 (35.8%) boarded 24 hours or longer. Compared with less than 4 hours, boarding 24 hours or longer was associated with increased perceived discrimination (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.99; P = .01). An increased association was observed in the subgroup of patients from racial and ethnic marginalized groups (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.20-4.65; P = .01); effect modification was not significant (P for interaction, .10). For all patients, boarding 24 hours or longer was associated with increased dissatisfaction with care (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.03-3.06; P = .04); effect modification was not significant (P for interaction, .80). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, hospitalized patients who boarded in the ED 24 hours or longer reported more discrimination and dissatisfaction with care, which may disproportionately affect patients from marginalized racial and ethnic groups. As ED boarding times increase nationally, it is critical to recognize their potential to exacerbate health inequities and to respond with equity-focused solutions.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Satisfacción del Paciente , Racismo , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Racismo/psicología , Racismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Boston , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Older adults with cognitive impairment often experience low mobility and functional decline in hospital, transfer to facility-based transitional care programs, and have poorer outcomes compared to those without cognitive impairment. This protocol paper describes a study which aims to determine the feasibility of, satisfaction with, and efficacy of a nurse-led mobility intervention (OASIS Walking Intervention) for older adults with cognitive impairment in facility-based transitional care programs in Ontario, Canada. A quasi-experimental one-group time series feasibility study will be conducted. A sample size of 26 participants will be recruited from two transitional care programs in Ontario, Canada. Participants will receive the OASIS Walking Intervention for up to 45 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. The intervention consists of: 1) a patient-centered communication care plan; 2) sit to stand activity; and 3) a walking program. Feasibility will be determined by: a) recruitment rate; b) retention rate; and c) adherence. Efficacy of the intervention will be determined by the change over time in older adults' lower extremity muscle strength, mobility, and functional status and by their discharge destination (home vs. nursing home). Satisfaction will be measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Efficacy outcomes will be measured before the start of the intervention, after 3 weeks of the intervention, and immediately after 6-week intervention. Descriptive statistics will be used for measures of feasibility, satisfaction, and discharge destination. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) will be used to analyze efficacy. Ethics approval has been received for this study. Findings from the study will be used to refine the intervention for use in a definitive pilot trial. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, international conferences, through group presentations at the study sites, and through the study site networks. Trial registration: The trial has been registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06150339).
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Estudios de Factibilidad , Cuidado de Transición , Caminata , Humanos , Anciano , Disfunción Cognitiva/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Ontario , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various fixation devices are available for bunion osteotomy. In this study, we evaluated the radiographic outcomes, postoperative complications, and recurrence rate in a series of hallux valgus deformities treated with various osteotomy procedures using a pin for the fixation of the osteotomy. METHODS: Two-hundred forty-seven patients with hallux valgus deformity managed with a Simple, Effective, Rapid and Inexpensive (SERI) osteotomy, distal chevron osteotomy, or proximal crescentic osteotomy and K-wire fixation were included. The mean follow-up of the patients was 53.9 ± 8.9 months. Radiographic evaluations included the assessment of the Hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and union. Clinical evaluations included the assessment of the range of motion, pain in the first metatarsophalangeal joint, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: In the last visit, the mean improvement of HVA was 23.9 ± 9.1º (P < 0.001). The mean IMA improvement was 6.1 ± 6º (P < 0.001). The mean metatarsophalangeal flexion and extension were 33 ± 10.7º and 34.6 ± 9.2º, respectively. Postoperative complications included pin tract infection in eight (3.2%) patients, deep infection in five (2%) patients, and early pin complication in four (1.6%) patients. Recurrence was observed in five (2%) patients. Twenty-three (9.3%) patients had slight pain in the last follow-up. The mean surgical time was smaller in the SERI osteotomy (P < 0.001). The mean hospitalization period was longer in the proximal osteotomy group (P = 0.039). The mean metatarsophalangeal flexion and extension were significantly smaller in the distal chevron osteotomy (P = 0.046 and P = 0.037, respectively). 90% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: K-wire fixation is a safe and effective device for the fixation of bunion osteotomy, and this effectiveness is even higher with SERI and proximal crescentic osteotomy.
Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Hallux Valgus , Osteotomía , Humanos , Osteotomía/métodos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Hallux Valgus/cirugía , Hallux Valgus/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Radiografía , Adulto Joven , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Hilos Ortopédicos , Rango del Movimiento ArticularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV infection has evolved substantially. The development of long-acting drugs, such as cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) might improve treatment satisfaction among people living with HIV (PLWH). The real-world effectiveness of long-acting ART and its effect on patient satisfaction needs to be assessed. This study investigated antiviral effectiveness and treatment satisfaction in PLWH who switched from conventional to long-acting ART (CAB + RPV). METHODS: This prospective cohort study included PLWH aged 18 years and older who switched to CAB + RPV and received the injections every 8 weeks between June 2022 and May 2023, after a 4-week oral lead-in phase. The eligibility criteria included viral suppression, absence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, and no prior RPV resistance mutations. Clinical data, including renal, lipid, and glucose biomarker levels, were monitored from the baseline to 44 weeks after switching. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. A linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate changes in clinical data from baseline. RESULTS: Thirty-eight male participants were enrolled. Some participants had detectable levels of viral replication; however, all participants maintained viral suppression (HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL) at 44 weeks and no cases of virological failure were detected. The creatinine level decreased by - 0.04 mg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.07 to - 0.01), lipid and glucose profiles remained stable, and treatment satisfaction increased by 6.6 points (95% CI: 2.4 to 10.8) after switching to CAB + RPV. CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting ART provides effective viral suppression and enhances treatment satisfaction in PLWH switching from conventional ART. Long-acting ART can improve patient well-being; however, patient selection and monitoring to prevent HBV-related complications are important.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Rilpivirina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Piridonas , DicetopiperazinasRESUMEN
Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy offers advantages, including minimal invasiveness, precise, and safe procedures. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concepts in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 62 patients who underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 30 were managed with ERAS principles, while 32 were managed using traditional perioperative management protocols. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative oral intake time, time to return of bowel function, time to ambulation, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, fluid replacement volume, length of hospital stay, total hospital expenses, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded and compared between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up included assessment of postoperative functional scores, reoperation rates, SF-36 quality of life scores, and survival rates. The average follow-up time was 35.6 months (range: 12-56 months). There were no statistically significant differences in general characteristics, including age, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and preoperative medical history between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had an earlier postoperative oral intake time, faster return of bowel function, rapid ambulation, and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.05). The intervention group also had lower postoperative VAS scores, lower fluid replacement volume, lower total hospital expenses, and a lower rate of complications (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in two-year functional scores, reoperation rates, quality of life scores, and survival rates (P > 0.05). Implementing ERAS principles in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy substantially expedited postoperative recovery, lowered pain scores, and diminished complications. However, there were no notable differences in long-term outcomes between the two groups.