RESUMEN

The history of pullorum disease is closely intertwined with the history of avian health research and that of the poultry industry. The seriousness of the disease galvanized the attention and brought together, for the first time, the pioneers of poultry health research to work cooperatively on different aspects of the disease. Control of the disease made it possible for intensive poultry production to develop as the basis for the modern poultry industry. During the early 1900s, bacillary white diarrhea (BWD) was a devastating disease of young chickens threatening the developing poultry industry. Dr. Leo F. Rettger isolated and described the bacterial pathogen, Salmonella enterica serotype Pullorum, for the first time in 1900. BWD was renamed pullorum disease in 1929. In subsequent years, Rettger and coworkers were able to reproduce the disease and fulfill Koch's postulates. Rettger et al. also showed that Salmonella Pullorum was vertically transmitted, which was the first time that a pathogen was shown to be vertically transmitted. The development of serologic tests was of crucial importance because it led to the development of effective eradication methods to identify carrier birds and to exclude these birds from the breeder flocks. The negative impact of pullorum disease on the poultry industry ultimately was one of the major reasons that the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP) was developed by scientists, the poultry industry, and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Needless to say, the work of the pioneering researchers formed the basis for the control of the disease. The NPIP started in 1935, with 34 states participating in testing 4 million birds representing 58.2% of the birds hatched. The program rapidly expanded to 47 states by 1948 and tested more than 30 million birds. In 1967, all commercial chicken hatcheries participating in the NPIP were 100% free of pullorum and typhoid disease caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Gallinarum. This historical overview of pullorum disease describes in some detail the progress made, especially during the early years, toward controlling this disease using methodologies that were often very basic but nonetheless effective. One has to admire the ingenuity and persistence of the early researchers leading to their achievements considering the research tools that were available at the time.

Artículo histórico­Pulorosis: Evolución de las estrategias de erradicación La historia de la pulorosis está estrechamente relacionada con la historia de la investigación en salud aviar y de la industria avícola. La severidad de la enfermedad despertó la atención y reunió, por primera vez a los pioneros de la investigación en salud avícola para trabajar de manera cooperativa en diferentes aspectos de la enfermedad. El control de la enfermedad hizo posible que la producción avícola intensiva se desarrollara como base de la industria avícola moderna. A principios de la década de los 1900, la diarrea blanca bacilar (con las siglas en inglés BWD) era una enfermedad devastadora de pollos jóvenes que amenazaba la industria avícola en desarrollo. El Dr. Leo F. Rettger aisló y describió el patógeno bacteriano, Salmonella enterica serotipo Pullorum, por primera vez en 1900. La diarrea blanca bacilar pasó a llamarse pulorosis (pullorum disease) en 1929. En los años siguientes, Rettger y sus colaboradores pudieron reproducir la enfermedad y cumplir los postulados de Koch. Rettger y col. también mostraron que Salmonella Pullorum se transmitía verticalmente, y fue la primera vez que se demostró que un patógeno se transmitía verticalmente. El desarrollo de pruebas serológicas fue de crucial importancia porque condujo al desarrollo de métodos de erradicación efectivos para identificar aves portadoras y eliminar a estas aves de las parvadas reproductoras. El impacto negativo de la pulorosis en la industria avícola fue, en última instancia, una de las principales razones por las que los científicos, la industria avícola y el Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA) desarrollaron el Plan Nacional de Mejoramiento Avícola (NPIP). Es importante decir que el trabajo de los investigadores pioneros formó la base para el control de la enfermedad. El Plan Nacional de Mejoramiento Avícola comenzó en año 1935, con 34 estados participando en el análisis de 4 millones de aves que representaban el 58.2% de las aves producidas. El programa se expandió rápidamente a 47 estados en 1948 y evaluó a más de 30 millones de aves. En 1967, todas las plantas incubadoras de pollos comerciales que participaban en el Plan Nacional de Mejoramiento Avícola estaban 100% libres de pulorosis y tifoidea aviar causada por Salmonella enterica serotipo Gallinarum. Esta reseña histórica de la pulorosis describe con cierto detalle el progreso realizado, especialmente durante los primeros años, hacia el control de esta enfermedad utilizando metodologías que a menudo eran muy básicas no obstante efectivas. Es admirable el ingenio y la persistencia de los primeros investigadores que los llevaron a sus logros considerando las herramientas de investigación que estaban disponibles en ese momento.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ampicillin, the first semi-synthetic penicillin active against Enterobacteriaceae, was released onto the market in 1961. The first outbreaks of disease caused by ampicillin-resistant strains of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium were identified in the UK in 1962 and 1964. We aimed to date the emergence of this resistance in historical isolates of S enterica serotype Typhimurium. METHODS: In this retrospective, whole-genome sequencing study, we analysed 288 S enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates collected between 1911 and 1969 from 31 countries on four continents and from various sources including human beings, animals, feed, and food. All isolates were tested for antimicrobial drug susceptibility with the disc diffusion method, and isolates shown to be resistant to ampicillin underwent resistance-transfer experiments. To provide insights into population structure and mechanisms of ampicillin resistance, we did whole-genome sequencing on a subset of 225 isolates, selected to maximise source, spatiotemporal, and genetic diversity. FINDINGS: 11 (4%) of 288 isolates were resistant to ampicillin because of acquisition of various ß lactamase genes, including blaTEM-1, carried by various plasmids, including the virulence plasmid of S enterica serotype Typhimurium. These 11 isolates were from three phylogenomic groups. One isolate producing TEM-1 ß lactamase was isolated in France in 1959 and two isolates producing TEM-1 ß lactamase were isolated in Tunisia in 1960, before ampicillin went on sale. The vectors for ampicillin resistance were different from those reported in the strains responsible for the outbreaks in the UK in the 1960s. INTERPRETATION: The association between antibiotic use and selection of resistance determinants is not as direct as often presumed. Our results suggest that the non-clinical use of narrow-spectrum penicillins (eg, benzylpenicillin) might have favoured the diffusion of plasmids carrying the blaTEM-1 gene in S enterica serotype Typhimurium in the late 1950s. FUNDING: Institut Pasteur, Santé publique France, the French Government's Investissement d'Avenir programme, the Fondation Le Roch-Les Mousquetaires.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)