RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) to albumin ratio (RAR) and prognosis in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study aims to investigate this association. METHODS: Clinical information of ARF patients was collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) version 2.0 database. The primary outcome was, in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, 60-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. Cox regression models and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between RAR and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4547 patients with acute respiratory failure were enrolled, with 2277 in the low ratio group (RAR < 4.83) and 2270 in the high ratio group (RAR > = 4.83). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant difference in survival probability between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, the Cox regression analysis showed that the high RAR ratio had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for in-hospital mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40; P = 0.003), as well as for 28-day mortality and 60-day mortality. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis further supported the finding that high RAR was an independent risk factor for ARF. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that RAR is an independent risk factor for poor clinical prognosis in patients with ARF admitted to the ICU. Higher RAR levels were associated with increased in-hospital, 28-day and 60-day mortality rates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is one of the interventions that have been in practice for ARDS for decades. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcomes of ECMO in pediatric trauma patients who suffered from ARDS. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database for years 2017 to 2019 and 2021 through 2022 was accessed for the study. All children younger than 18 years old who were admitted to the hospital after trauma and suffered from ARDS were included in the study. Other variables included in the study were patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, comorbidities, and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: ECMO is the exposure, and the outcomes are in-hospital mortality and hospital complications (acute kidney injury [AKI], pneumonia and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]). RESULTS: Of 453 patients who qualified for the study, propensity score matching found 50 pairs of patients. There were no significant differences identified between the groups, ECMO+ vs. ECMO- on patients' age in years (16 yr; interquartile range [IQR], 13.25-17 yr vs. 16 yr [14.25-17 yr]), race (White; 62.0% vs. 66.0%), sex (male; 78% vs. 76%), ISS (23 [IQR, 9.25-34] vs. 22 [9.25-32]), and GCS (15 [IQR, 3-15] vs. 13.5 [3-15]), mechanism of injury; and comorbidities. There was no difference between the groups, ECMO+ vs. ECMO-, in-hospital mortality (10.0% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.302), hospital complications (AKI 12.0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.131), pneumonia (10.0% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.182 > ), and DVT (16% vs. 6%; p = 0.228). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No difference in mortality was observed in injured children who suffered from the ARDS and were placed on ECMO when compared with patients who were not placed on ECMO. Patients with trauma and ARDS who require ECMO have comparable outcomes to those who do not receive ECMO. A larger sample size study is needed to find the exact benefit of ECMO in this patients' cohort.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explore the latest evidence on long-term outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU because of acute respiratory failure (ARF). RECENT FINDINGS: As the survival rate of critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure improves, long-term mortality and disability still influence the quality of life of survivors and their caregivers. Patients admitted to the ICU because of ARF are at risk of developing the postintensive care syndrome, which presents with physical, cognitive and mental symptoms, all of which may impair their quality of life. Caregivers seem to be affected as well, which may lead to intergenerational trauma. The need for more care, including prone positioning, invasive support (e.g. mechanical ventilation, ECMO) and deep sedation are probably adjunctive risk factors for poor long-term outcomes. SUMMARY: There is not much data on the long-term outcomes of patients who have survived ARF. More follow-up studies should be conducted, especially in centers providing higher levels of costly care (e.g. ECMO). Randomized controlled trials on interventions for ARF should include patient-centered long-term outcomes in addition to mortality rates. The high mortality rates associated with ARF mandate collaboration among multiple centers to achieve an adequate sample size for studying the long-term outcomes of survivors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This retrospective cohort study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes and assess risk factors for mortality across the epidemic waves in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a major tertiary-care center in Pakistan. A total of 5368 patients with COVID-19, hospitalized between March 2020 and April 2022 were included. The median age was 58 years (IQR: 44-69), 41% were females, and the overall mortality was 12%. Comparative analysis of COVID-19 waves showed that the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years was highest during the post-wave 4 period (61.4%) and Wave 4 (Delta) (50%) (p < 0.001). Male predominance decreased from 65.2% in Wave 2 to 44.2% in Wave 5 (Omicron) (p < 0.001). Mortality rate was lowest at 9.4% in wave 5 and highest at 21.6% in the post-wave 4 period (p = 0.041). In multivariable analysis for risk factors of mortality, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was most strongly associated with mortality (aOR 22.98, 95% CI 15.28-34.55, p < 0.001), followed by need for mechanical ventilation (aOR 6.81, 95% CI 5.13-9.05, p < 0.001). Other significant risk factors included acute kidney injury (aOR 3.05, 95% CI 2.38-3.91, p < 0.001), stroke (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 1.26-4.60, p = 0.008), pulmonary embolism (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.28-3.35, p = 0.003), and age ≥ 60 years (aOR 2.45, 95% CI 1.95-3.09, p < 0.001). Enoxaparin use was associated with lower mortality odds (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.60, p < 0.001. Patients hospitalized during Wave 4 (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.39-3.56, p < 0.001) and the post-wave 4 period (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.37-5.80, p = 0.005) had higher mortality odds compared to other waves. The study identifies higher mortality risk in patients admitted in Delta wave and post-wave, aged ≥ 60 years, and with respiratory and renal complications, and lower risk with anticoagulation during COVID-19 waves.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the association between glucocorticoid administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with ARDS using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. Data were collected from the MIMIC-III database, which consists of critically ill participants between 2001 and 2012 in the USA. A total of 1831 adult critically ill patients with ARDS were enrolled from the MIMIC-III database. The 60-day and in-hospital mortality, were the primary endpoints. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), 28-day ventilator-free days, ICU mortality, and 28-day mortality. A total of 1831 patients were included in the data analysis. After propensity score (PS) matching, 464 patients diagnosed with ARDS were matched between the glucocorticoid treatment and control groups. Glucocorticoids were associated with increased in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.32; 95% CI 1.01-1.71; P = .039], longer ICU stay [HR 2.25; 95% CI 0.84-3.65; P = .002], and shorter ventilation-free days at 28 days in all ARDS patients [HR -2.70; 95% CI -4.28--1.13; P = .001]. The 60-day mortality was higher in the glucocorticoid group (44.83% vs 35.34%; P = .154; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.93-1.66). Excluding the impact of the glucocorticoid initiation time, from day 15 to day 60, mortality was significantly higher in the glucocorticoid group compared to the non-glucocorticoid group (27.16% vs 12.70%; P < .001; HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.32-2.32). Glucocorticoid administration was associated with worse 60-day and in-hospital survival, longer ICU stay, and shorter ventilator-free days on day 28 in patients with ARDS. Our findings suggest careful consideration of glucocorticoids for ARDS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventilation management may differ between COVID-19 ARDS (COVID-ARDS) patients and patients with pre-COVID ARDS (CLASSIC-ARDS); it is uncertain whether associations of ventilation management with outcomes for CLASSIC-ARDS also exist in COVID-ARDS. METHODS: Individual patient data analysis of COVID-ARDS and CLASSIC-ARDS patients in six observational studies of ventilation, four in the COVID-19 pandemic and two pre-pandemic. Descriptive statistics were used to compare epidemiology and ventilation characteristics. The primary endpoint were key ventilation parameters; other outcomes included mortality and ventilator-free days and alive (VFD-60) at day 60. RESULTS: This analysis included 6702 COVID-ARDS patients and 1415 CLASSIC-ARDS patients. COVID-ARDS patients received lower median VT (6.6 [6.0 to 7.4] vs 7.3 [6.4 to 8.5] ml/kg PBW; p < 0.001) and higher median PEEP (12.0 [10.0 to 14.0] vs 8.0 [6.0 to 10.0] cm H2O; p < 0.001), at lower median ΔP (13.0 [10.0 to 15.0] vs 16.0 [IQR 12.0 to 20.0] cm H2O; p < 0.001) and higher median Crs (33.5 [26.6 to 42.1] vs 28.1 [21.6 to 38.4] mL/cm H2O; p < 0.001). Following multivariable adjustment, higher ΔP had an independent association with higher 60-day mortality and less VFD-60 in both groups. Higher PEEP had an association with less VFD-60, but only in COVID-ARDS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show important differences in key ventilation parameters and associations thereof with outcomes between COVID-ARDS and CLASSIC-ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT05650957), December 14, 2022.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the role of platelet count (PLT) in the prognosis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: The data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database (version 2.2). Patients diagnosed with ARDS according to criteria from Berlin Definition and had the platelet count (PLT) measured within the first day after intensive care unit admission were analyzed. Based on PLT, ARDS patients were divided into four groups: PLT ≤ 100 × 109/L, PLT 101-200 × 109/L, PLT 201-300 × 109/L, and PLT > 300 × 109/L. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Survival probabilities were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. Furthermore, the association between PLT and mortality in ARDS patients was assessed using a univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Overall, the final analysis included 3,207 eligible participants with ARDS. According to the Kaplan-Meier curves for 28-day mortality of PLT, PLT ≤ 100 × 109/L was associated with a higher incidence of mortality (P = 0.001), the same trends were observed in the 60-day (P = 0.001) and 90-day mortality (P = 0.001). In the multivariate model adjusted for the potential factors, the adjusted hazard ratio at PLT 101-200 × 109/L group, PLT 201-300 × 109/L, and PLT > 300 × 109/L was 0.681 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.576-0.805, P < 0.001], 0.733 (95% CI: 0.604-0.889, P = 0.002), and 0.787 (95% CI: 0.624-0.994, P = 0.044) compared to the reference group (PLT ≤ 100 × 109/L), respectively. Similar relationships between the PLT ≤ 100 × 109/L group and 28-day mortality were obtained in most subgroups. CONCLUSION: PLT appeared to be an independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with ARDS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive summary of the published data on cause of death in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DATA SOURCES: PubMed (January 2015 to April 2024), bibliographies of relevant articles, and ARDS Network and Prevention & Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) network websites. STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies and clinical trials that reported on cause of death in greater than or equal to 30 patients with ARDS, not obtained from death certificates. Animal studies, case reports, review articles, study protocols, and studies in pediatrics were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Causes of death among ARDS patients who died were extracted and tabulated along with other pertinent study characteristics. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 15 observational studies (nine non-COVID ARDS, five COVID-related ARDS; one both) and five clinical trials (all non-COVID ARDS). Mutually exclusive prespecified categories were used for recording the cause of death in only eight studies although studies differed in the categories included and their definitions. When multiple organ failure was a predetermined category, it was the most common cause of death recorded (~50% of deaths), followed by respiratory causes with proportions varying from 16% to 42% depending on nomenclature (e.g., refractory hypoxemia, pulmonary causes) and definitions. However, the largest observational study in non-COVID ARDS (964 deaths), did not include multiple organ failure as a predetermined category, and found that pulmonary failure (42%) and cardiac failure (37%) were the most common causes of death. In COVID-related ARDS observational studies, pulmonary reasons were the most reported cause of death (up to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have reported cause of death in patients with ARDS. In those that do, cause of death categories and definitions used are heterogeneous. Further research is needed to see whether a more rigorous and unified approach to assigning and reporting cause of death in ARDS would help identify more relevant endpoints for the assessment of targeted treatments in clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a devastating critical care syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive values of dynamic clinical indices by developing machine-learning (ML) models for early and accurate clinical assessment of the disease prognosis of ARDS. We conducted a retrospective observational study by applying dynamic clinical data collected in the ARDSNet FACTT Trial (n = 1000) to ML-based algorithms for predicting mortality. In order to compare the significance of clinical features dynamically, we further applied the random forest (RF) model to nine selected clinical parameters acquired at baseline and day 3 independently. An RF model trained using clinical data collected at day 3 showed improved performance and prognostication efficacy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78-0.89) compared to baseline with an AUC value of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65-0.78). Mean airway pressure (MAP), bicarbonate, age, platelet count, albumin, heart rate, and glucose were the most significant clinical indicators associated with mortality at day 3. Thus, clinical features collected early (day 3) improved performance of integrative ML models with better prognostication for mortality. Among these, MAP represented the most important feature for ARDS patients' early risk stratification.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Age as an eligibility criterion for V-V ECMO is widely debated and varies among healthcare institutions. We examined how age relates to mortality in patients undergoing V-V ECMO for ARDS. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-regression of clinical studies published between 2015 and June 2024. Studies involving at least 6 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO, with specific data on ICU and/or hospital mortality and patient age were included. The search strategy was executed in PubMed, limited to English-language. COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 populations were analyzed separately. Meta-regressions of mortality outcomes on age were performed using gender, BMI, SAPS II, APACHE II, Charlson comorbidity index or SOFA as covariates. RESULTS: In non-COVID ARDS, the meta-regression of 173 studies with 56,257 participants showed a significant positive association between mean age and ICU/hospital mortality. In COVID-19 ARDS, a significant relationship between mean age and ICU mortality, but not hospital mortality, was found in 103 studies with 21,255 participants. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings, highlighting a linear relationship between age and mortality in both groups. For each additional year of mean age, ICU mortality increased by 1.2% in non-COVID ARDS and 1.9% in COVID ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between age and ICU mortality is linear and shows no inflection point. Consequently, no age cut-off can be recommended for determining patient eligibility for V-V ECMO.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present the findings from a cohort of patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome who underwent standard therapy, including prone positioning, with or without adjunctive inhalation of nitric oxide. Our investigation sought to determine whether inhaled nitric oxide administration yielded clinical enhancement in this population. Remarkably, nitric oxide administration elevated the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, which is indicative of improved oxygenation. Despite this improvement, discernible mortality benefits did not emerge in association with the inhaled nitric oxide treatment. To evaluate the responsiveness of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients to inhaled nitric oxide as part of their standard therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included critically ill adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated between March 2020 and May 2021. Eligible patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 were subsequently categorized into two groups based on inhaled nitric oxide use throughout their stay in the intensive care unit. The primary endpoints were overall mortality and improvement in oxygenation parameters 6 hours after inhaled nitric oxide use. RESULTS: A total of 481 patients admitted to the intensive care unit due to COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome were screened, 105 of which were included. Among the 105 patients, inhaled nitric oxide therapy was used in 33 patients, will 72 did not undergo inhaled nitric oxide therapy. No significant difference in mortality was observed between the groups (67% for the treatment and 82% for the no-treatment groups respectively, p=0.173). Among the patients who used inhaled nitric oxide, 17 (51%) were considered responsive to therapy. There was no significant difference in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (p=0.324) or total hospitalization time (p=0.344). CONCLUSION: Inhaled nitric oxide rescue therapy improved oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome but did not affect mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are respiratory diseases with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of ARDS often yield contradictory results. We hereby conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a search for randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that utilized corticosteroids for patients with ARDS in Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane or NOS scales. Statistical effect size was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies, comprising 11 observational studies and 9 RCTs, were eligible for analysis. In RCTs, corticosteroids were associated with a reduction of mortality in ARDS patients (relative risk [RR] = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.71-0.91, p = 0.001). Further subgroup analysis indicated that specific variables, such as low-dose (RR = 0.81; 95%CI: 0.67-0.98; p = 0.034), methylprednisolone (RR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.49-0.98; p = 0.035), and dexamethasone (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69-0.98; p = 0.029) were associated with mortality among patients receiving corticosteroids. However, in observational studies, corticosteroids increased the risk of death (RR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.29; p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the use of high-dose corticosteroids was associated with higher patient mortality (RR = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.04-1.38; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of corticosteroids on the mortality of ARDS differed by the type and dosage of corticosteroids used, as well as the etiologies. Current data do not support routine use of corticosteroids in ARDS since protective effects were observed in RCTs but increased mortality was found in observational studies. More well designed and large clinical trials are needed to specify the favorable subgroups for corticosteroid therapy.

Corticosteroid use may reduce the risk of death in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to randomized controlled trials.Observational studies indicate that corticosteroid use may increase the risk of death in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients but not in COVID-19 ARDS patients.Both regular and low-dose corticosteroids show benefits in reducing mortality in RCTs, but observational studies associate these doses with increased mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) is the most severe form of acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Most studies related to ARDS have excluded patients with hematologic diseases, let alone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Numerous patients experiencing severe hypoxic respiratory failure do not meet the Berlin definition due to the limitations of diagnosis and treatment. A new definition of ARDS, remove some diagnosis restrictions, was proposed in 2023. Based on the 2023 new definition of ARDS, we investigated the clinical features of ARDS in allo-HSCT recipients and reported risk factors for in-hospital mortality in allo-HSCT recipients defined by the Berlin definition and the new definition of ARDS respectively. METHODS: From Jan 2016 to Dec 2020, 135 allo-HSCT recipients identified with the new definition and 87 identified with the Berlin definition at three teaching hospitals were retrospectively included in this study. Variables (demographic information, characteristics of hematologic disease and ARDS episode, laboratory tests and SOFA score) with P < 0.05 in univariate logistic regression analysis were included in multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were reported. RESULTS: Under the new definition, SOFA score (OR = 1.351, 95% CI: 1.146-1.593, P < 0.01) were found as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in ARDS after allo-HSCT, while SpO2/FiO2 (OR = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.972-0.996, P < 0.01) was a protective factor. The infusion of peripheral-derived stem cells was found to be a protective factor against in-hospital mortality in post-transplantation ARDS compared with the infusion of bone marrow-derived stem cells (OR = 0.726, 95% CI: 0.164-3.221, P = 0.04). Under the Berlin definition, PaO2/FiO2 (OR = 0.977, 95% CI: 0.961-0.993, P = 0.01, lactate (OR = 7.337, 95% CI: 1.313-40.989, P < 0.01) and AST (OR = 1.165, 95% CI: 1.072-1.265, P < 0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: These prognostic risk factors we found in allo-HSCT recipients may contribute to closer monitoring and ARDS prevention strategies. These findings require confirmation in prospective, large sample size studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute respiratory failure often require mechanical ventilation to reduce the work of breathing and improve gas exchange; however, this may exacerbate lung injury. Protective ventilation strategies, characterized by low tidal volumes (≤ 8mL/kg of predicted body weight) and limited plateau pressure below 30cmH2O, have shown improved outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, in the transition to spontaneous ventilation, it can be challenging to maintain tidal volume within protective levels, and it is unclear whether low tidal volumes during spontaneous ventilation impact patient outcomes. We developed a study protocol to estimate the prevalence of low tidal volume ventilation in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure and its association with ventilator-free days and survival. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, multinational, cohort study with a 28-day follow-up that will include patients with acute respiratory failure, defined as a partial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio < 300mmHg, in transition to spontaneous ventilation in intensive care units in Latin America. RESULTS: We plan to include 422 patients in ten countries. The primary outcomes are the prevalence of low tidal volume in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation and ventilator-free days on day 28. The secondary outcomes are intensive care unit and hospital mortality, incidence of asynchrony and return to controlled ventilation and sedation. CONCLUSION: In this study, we will assess the prevalence of low tidal volume during spontaneous ventilation and its association with clinical outcomes, which can inform clinical practice and future clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) in an emerging technique used in the intensive care unit (ICU). The derivative LUS aeration score has been shown to have associations with mortality in invasively ventilated patients. This study assessed the predictive value of baseline and early changes in LUS aeration scores in critically ill invasively ventilated patients with and without ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) on 30- and 90-day mortality. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational cohort study, which included patients admitted to the ICU with an expected duration of ventilation for at least 24 h. We restricted participation to patients who underwent a 12-region LUS exam at baseline and had the primary endpoint (30-day mortality) available. Logistic regression was used to analyze the primary and secondary endpoints. The analysis was performed for the complete patient cohort and for predefined subgroups (ARDS and no ARDS). RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were included, of whom 245 had a second LUS exam. The baseline LUS aeration score was not associated with mortality (1.02 (95% CI: 0.99 - 1.06), p = 0.143). This finding was not different in patients with and in patients without ARDS. Early deterioration of the LUS score was associated with mortality (2.09 (95% CI: 1.01 - 4.3), p = 0.046) in patients without ARDS, but not in patients with ARDS or in the complete patient cohort. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of critically ill invasively ventilated patients, the baseline LUS aeration score was not associated with 30- and 90-day mortality. An early change in the LUS aeration score was associated with mortality, but only in patients without ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT04482621.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To explore the factors affecting the prognosis of severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Methods: It was a multicenter prospective observational study. A total of 95 children with severe ARDS who were treated with ECMO salvage therapy from January 2018 to December 2022 in 9 pediatric ECMO centers in China were enrolled in the study. The general data, disease severity, organ function, comprehensive treatment and prognosis were recorded, and they were divided into survival group and death group according to the outcome at discharge. T test, chi-square test, multivariate Logistic regression and mixed linear model were used to analyze the relationship among baseline before ECMO treatment, some important indicators (pediatric critical scores, platelet count, albumin, fibrinogen, etc) during ECMO treatment and prognosis. Results: Among the 95 children with severe ARDS who received ECMO, 55 (58%) were males and 40 (42%) were females, aged 36.9 (0.5, 72.0) months. Twelve children (13%) were immunodeficient. Sixty-eight (72%) children were treated with venous artery (VA) mode and 27 (28%) with venous vein (VV) mode. The discharge survival rates of overall, VA, and VV mode children were 51% (48/95), 47% (32/68), and 59% (16/27), respectively. The number of immunodeficient children in the death group was higher, and there were lower pediatric critical scores, platelet count, albumin, fibrinogen and arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), higher ventilator driving pressure (ΔP), oxygenaion index (OI), and longer ARDS duration before ECMO (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in other indicators, including age, gender, weight, and ECMO mode among different prognostic groups (all P>0.05). High ΔP, high OI, low P/F, and low albumin were high-risk factors affecting prognosis(all P<0.05). After further grouping, it was found that ΔP≥25 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa), P/F≤67 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and OI≥35 were the thresholds for predicting poor prognosis (P<0.05). From 24 h after ECMO, there were significant differences in ΔP, P/F and OI between the dead group and the survival group (all P<0.05), and the differences gradually increased with the ECMO process. The platelet level was significant from 7 days after ECMO (P<0.05) and gradually expanded. Blood lactate levels showed a significant difference between the 2 groups on before and after ECMO (P<0.05) and gradually increased from 24 h after ECMO. Conclusions: The risk factors affecting the prognosis of severe ARDS in ECMO include high ΔP, high OI, low P/F and low albumin purification therapy before ECMO. The gradual decrease of ΔP, OI and increase of P/F from 24 h of ECMO predicted a good prognosis, while the gradual increase of lactate after ECMO application showed a poor prognosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategy in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains debated. Most studies originate from the initial waves of the pandemic. Here we aimed to assess the impact of high PEEP/low FiO2 ventilation on outcomes during the second wave in the Netherlands. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients during the second wave. Patients were categorized based on whether they received high PEEP or low PEEP ventilation according to the ARDS Network tables. The primary outcome was ICU mortality, and secondary outcomes included hospital and 90-day mortality, duration of ventilation and length of stay, and the occurrence of kidney injury. Propensity matching was performed to correct for factors with a known relationship to ICU mortality. RESULTS: This analysis included 790 COVID-ARDS patients. At ICU discharge, 32 (22.5%) out of 142 high PEEP patients and 254 (39.2%) out of 848 low PEEP patients had died (HR 0.66 [0.46-0.96]; P = 0.03). High PEEP was linked to improved secondary outcomes. Matched analysis did not change findings. CONCLUSIONS: High PEEP ventilation was associated with improved ICU survival in patients with COVID-ARDS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report two-year survival after scheduled extubation in patients with pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in a respiratory ICU of a teaching hospital. Pneumonia or ARDS patients who successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled. Data were collected before extubation. Patients were followed up to two years by phone every 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were enrolled in final analysis. One-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month survival was 77.4%, 63.8%, 61.3%, 57.8%, and 47.8%, respectively. Cox regression shows that Charlson comorbidity index (hazard ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.32), APACHE II score before extubation (1.11, 1.05-1.17), cough peak flow before extubation (0.993, 0.986-0.999), and extubation failure (3.96, 2.51-6.24) were associated with two-year mortality. To predict death within two years, the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic was 0.79 tested by Charlson comorbidity index, 0.75 tested by APACHE II score, and 0.75 tested by cough peak flow. Two-year survival was 31% and 77% in patients with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 1 and < 1, 28% and 62% in patients with APACHE II score ≥ 12 and < 12, and 64% and 17% in patients with cough peak flow > 58 and ≤ 58 L/min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity, disease severity, weak cough and extubation failure were associated with increased two-year mortality in pneumonia or ARDS patients who experienced scheduled extubation. It provides objective information to caregivers to improve decision-making process during hospitalization and post discharge.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Pathogenic diversity may have contributed to the high mortality of pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (p-ARDS). Metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) serves as a valuable diagnostic tool for early pathogen identification. However, its clinical utility in p-ARDS remains understudied. There are still limited researches on the etiology, clinical characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality in p-ARDS patients. Methods: A single center retrospective cohort study of 75 p-ARDS patients was conducted. Patients were categorized into survival and deceased groups based on their 28-day outcomes. A comprehensive clinical evaluation was conducted, including baseline characteristics, laboratory indicators, outcomes and pathogen identification by mNGS and traditional microbiological testing. We then evaluated the diagnostic value of mNGS and identified clinical characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality in p-ARDS. Result: The overall ICU mortality was 26.67%, and the 28-day mortality was 57.33%, with 32 cases (42.67%) in the survival group, and 43 cases (57.33%) in the deceased group. Patients in the deceased group were older than those in the survival group (68(59,73) years vs. 59(44,67) years, P=0.04). The average lengths of ICU and hospital stay were 9(5,13) days and 14(7,21) days, respectively. The survival group had longer lengths of ICU and hospital stay (ICU: 11(7,17) days and hospital: 17(9,27) days) compared to the deceased group (ICU: 8(4,11) days and hospital: 12(6,19) days) (P<0.05). Survival patients exhibited lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score on the 3rd and 7th days, higher lymphocyte counts, higher CD3+ and CD8+ T cell counts compared to deceased patients (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, APACHE II scores on 3rd and 7th days, CD8+ T cell count and length of ICU as independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in p-ARDS patients. mNGS demonstrated a significantly higher overall pathogen detection rate (70/75, 93.33%) compared to the traditional method (50/75, 66.67%, P=0.022). The average turnaround time (TAT) for mNGS was significantly shorter at 1(1,1) day compared to 4(3,5) days for the traditional method (P<0.001). Conclusion: Metagenome next-generation sequencing can be used as a valuable tool for identifying pathogens in p-ARDS, reducing diagnostic time and improving accuracy. Early application of mNGS alongside traditional methods is recommended for p-ARDS. Furthermore, older age, higher APACHE II scores, lower lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte subset counts were associated with increased mortality in p-ARDS patients, highlighting the importance of timely assessment of immune status and disease severity, especially in elderly.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)