RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women with breast cancer face many barriers to return to work (RTW) after their cancer. The main objective of the FASTRACS-RCT is to evaluate the impact of the FASTRACS (Facilitate and Sustain Return to Work after Breast Cancer) intervention on the sustainable RTW of breast cancer patients, 12 months after the end of active treatment. METHODS: FASTRACS-RCT is a prospective, national, multicentre, randomized, controlled and open-label study. A total of 420 patients with early breast cancer scheduled for surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to: (i) the intervention arm comprising four steps over 6 months : Handing over the intervention tools; transitional medical consultation with the general practitioner (GP); pre-RTW visit with the company's occupational physician (OP); catch-up visit with a hospital-based RTW expert (if sick leave > 10 months) (ii) the control arm to receive usual care. The design of the FASTRACS intervention was informed by intervention mapping for complex interventions in health promotion planning, and involved patients and representatives of relevant stakeholders. Specific tools were developed to bridge the gap between the hospital, the GP, the OP and the workplace: a toolkit for breast cancer patients comprising a theory-based guide; specific checklists for the GP and the OP, respectively; and a theory-based guide for workplace actors (employer, manager, colleagues). The primary endpoint will associate sustainable RTW (full-time or part-time work at 50% or more of working time, for at least 28 consecutive days) and days off work. It will be assessed at 4, 8 and 12 months after the end of active oncological treatment. Secondary endpoints will include quality of life, anxiety, depression, RTW self-efficacy, physical activity, social support, job accommodations, work productivity, job status, and the usefulness and acceptability of the intervention's tools. DISCUSSION: FASTRACS-RCT will be supplemented by a realist evaluation approach aimed at understanding the influence of context in activating the intervention's mechanisms and effects. If the expected impact of the intervention is confirmed, the intervention will be adapted and scaled-up for other cancers and chronic diseases to better integrate healthcare and work disability prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04846972 ; April 15, 2021.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: During and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donation, donors may experience adverse events. This situation can increase anxiety of candidate donors. Time to return to daily life routine and work, presentation of comorbid diseases in follow-up, and donor opinions are topics of interest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 14-question survey among related stem cell donors between January 2010 and March 2019 by telephone interview. RESULTS: Of 257 related donors, 175 (68.1%) were interviewed; 87 (49.7%) were female and 88 (50.3%) were male. Among donors interviewed, 144 (82.3%) donated from only peripheral blood. After harvesting of stem cells, adverse events included hip pain (38.7%), bone pain (57.2%) during mobilization, and paresthesia (28.9%) during apheresis. After apheresis, 2 serious adverse events were reported in 2 (1.3%) female donors (1 salpingo-oophorectomy and 1 nephrectomy). Splenomegaly was observed in 1 male donor (0.7%). Among donors interviewed, 77 (44%) reported being able to perform daily activities on the same day. The shortest time to daily activity was in the peripheral blood group, and the longest was in the bone marrow group (P = .001). Among working donors, 23 (27.4%) returned to work on the same day; all were peripheral blood donors. Among donors interviewed, 114 (65.1%) wanted to volunteer to donate again. One donor (0.6%) expressed guilt after donation, and 162 (92.6%) recommended other people to be stem cell donors. During the follow-up period, musculoskeletal-joint diseases increased after donation (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to raise awareness in society about stem cell donation and to reduce the concerns among donor candidates. Although most of the adverse events after donation are temporary and mild, a few serious adverse events in donors have been observed. Stem cell donation does not cause loss of daily activity or inability to return to the work force.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery disease is one of the most common causes of disability and work loss among working-age individuals. Since the ability to return to work after cardiovascular events depends on several factors, identifying these factors can be helpful in treatment planning and effective rehabilitation. In this study, we aimed to assess the employment status and related factors one year after angiography in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome and to investigate the impact of occupational factors on angiographic characteristics. METHODS: This retrospective study included 447 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent angiography between February 2020 and March 2021 at a teaching hospital. Data regarding employment status and other related variables, including the Job Content Questionnaire, were collected through medical record reviews and telephone interviews one year after hospital discharge. The participants' occupational factors and return-to-work status were then compared. RESULTS: One year after angiography, the rate of returning to work was 70%. Of these, 86.3% had resumed their previous job. Factors associated with a reduced return to work included major coronary artery involvement, a history of hypertension, lower ejection fraction, and increased hospitalization days. Occupational risk factors such as low income, longer working hours, and high job demand also decreased the likelihood of returning to employment. CONCLUSION: Various clinical and socioeconomic factors can predict the probability of returning to work after angiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Considering these factors could be useful in formulating clinical guidelines to improve employment outcomes for these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the UK, one in four patients are in work at the time of their hip or knee replacement surgery. These patients receive little support about their return to work (RTW). There is a need for an occupational support intervention that encourages safe and sustained RTW which can be integrated into National Health Service practice. We developed a two-arm intervention trial, based on a feasibility study, to assess whether an occupational support intervention (the OPAL (Occupational support for Patients undergoing Arthroplasty of the Lower limb) intervention) is effective in supporting a reduced time to full, sustained RTW compared with usual care in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, individually randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the OPAL intervention to usual care. 742 working adults listed for elective primary hip or knee replacement, who intend to RTW, will be randomised to the OPAL intervention or usual care. The intervention comprises: (1) multimedia information resources; and (2) support from a designated RTW coordinator. The primary outcome is time until 'full' sustained RTW without sick leave for a consecutive 4-week period. Secondary outcomes are: time to any RTW, measures of functional recovery, number of 'sick days' between surgery and 'full' sustained RTW and the use of workplace modifications to facilitate their return. A health economic evaluation and a mixed methods process evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness and the implementation, fidelity and acceptability of the intervention, respectively. Outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up time points, as well as a monthly RTW questionnaire. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Dissemination will focus on supporting the wider adoption and implementation of the intervention (if effective) and will target groups for whom the results will be relevant. This trial was approved by West Midlands-Edgbaston REC 23/WM/0013. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13694911.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately onethird of cancer survivors encounter challenges reintegrating into the workforce, often experiencing involuntary unemployment and/or partial or full work disability following diagnosis and treatment. Returning to paid employment presents evident challenges due to uncertainties regarding work ability, perceived employer discrimination, and a lack of support, thereby risking social exclusion. However, interventions addressing return to paid employment among unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors are scarce. Here, we describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), including a process and economic evaluation, evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES (unemPLoyed cAnCEr survivors Support) intervention aimed at supporting unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors returning to paid employment. METHODS: A two-armed RCT with a 12-month follow-up period will be conducted. Eligible participants: (1) are of working age (18-65 years), (2) are diagnosed with cancer between 6 months and 10 years ago, (3) are unemployed and/or partially or fully work-disabled, (4) have completed cancer treatment, and (5) are seeking paid employment and are motivated to initiate work immediately. Participants will primarily be identified through the Dutch Social Security Agency and the Netherlands Cancer Registry and recruited via healthcare professionals. Participants randomly allocated to the intervention group (n = 82) will receive the PLACES intervention: a tailored supported employment intervention based on the principles of Individual Placement and Support (IPS). This includes support in seeking, returning to, and maintaining paid employment. Participants allocated to the control group (n = 82) will receive care as usual. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaires, at baseline (T0), and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months of follow-up. The primary outcome is paid employment [yes/no]. Secondary outcomes are time until paid employment, change in working hours, work ability, quality of (working) life, and self-efficacy regarding return to work. Additionally, process and economic evaluations will be conducted. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that the PLACES intervention will be effective in obtaining paid employment, enhancing work ability, and improving quality of life. In addition, we expect the intervention to be cost-effective. If proven effective and cost-effective, actions should be taken to implement the intervention in usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06028048.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancarpal arthrodesis (PCA) is a commonly performed procedure in the UK. However, it is not known whether working dogs in the UK and other European countries with carpal injuries that have undergone unilateral PCA are able to return to working ability as determined by the owner. Medical records from a referral hospital in the UK were reviewed retrospectively for cases of working dogs treated using unilateral PCA. Case files and radiographs were retrospectively analysed for cause of injury, diagnosis, and complications. The ability of the dog to work after surgery and owner satisfaction with the outcome were assessed using telephone questionnaire. RESULTS: 50% (5/10, 50%) owners stated their dog could perform normal duties, 4/10 (40%) could perform most duties with some allowances. Outcome was not as good for dogs working on steep, uneven fell terrain. 80% (8/10, 80%) owners rated the level of post-operative lameness as unaffected with a normal gait. 90% (9/10, 90%) owners were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of the procedure, and 90% owners stated the financial investment was worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral PCA carries a good prognosis for working dogs with high owner satisfaction. Caution should be advised for dogs expected to work on steep, uneven fell terrain.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

While robotic and laparoscopic surgeries are both minimally invasive in nature, they are intrinsically different approaches and it is critical to understand outcome differences between the two. Studies evaluating pain outcomes and opioid requirement differences between the robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections are conflicting and often underpowered. In this retrospective, cohort study, we compare postoperative opioid requirements, reported as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), postoperative average and highest pain scores across postoperative days (POD) 0-5, and return to work in patients who underwent robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal resections. The sample size was selected based on power calculations. Daily pain scores and MME were used as outcomes in linear mixed effect models with unstructured covariance between time points. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for imbalances. Patients in the robotic group required significantly less opioids as measured by MME on all postoperative days (p = 0.004), as well as lower average and highest daily pain scores for POD 0-5 (p = 0.02, and p = 0.006, respectively). In a linear mixed-effects model, robotic resections were associated with a decrease in average pain scores by 0.36 over time (p = 0.03) and 35 fewer MME requirements than the laparoscopic group (p = 0.0004). Patients in the robotic arm had earlier return to work (2.1 vs 3.8 days, p = 0.036). The robotic approach to colorectal resections is associated with significantly less postoperative pain, decreased opioid requirements, and earlier return to work when compared to laparoscopy, suggesting that the robotic platform provides important clinical advantages over the laparoscopic approach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression significantly impacts recovery and return to daily activities in cardiac surgery patients. Assessing and managing depressive symptoms before and after surgery are crucial for improving surgical outcomes and timely return to daily activities, including work. The objectives of this study were to examine differences in patients' depression levels in relation to their return to daily activities in the early post-cardiac surgery period, and to assess predictors of delayed return to daily activities. METHODS: This single-centered study assessed return to independence, social participation, hobbies, and work in 100 cardiac surgical patients at 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. Associations between depression levels and return to daily activities scores were evaluated. RESULTS: Higher Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores were significantly associated with delayed return to daily activities in all categories at both 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. Specifically, higher depression score delayed return to independence and social participation at 2 weeks, and delayed return to independence, social participation, and return to work at 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Elevated depression scores are significantly associated with delayed return to daily activities post-cardiac surgery, indicating the importance of evaluating depression in cardiac surgical patients in the postend stage-operative period.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common invasive neoplasm and affects many women of working age. The return to work (RTW) of female survivors (BCSs) is associated with a better quality of life and longer survival. A tailored intervention to promote RTW was launched in 2022. A year later, the women were contacted to find out if RTW had occurred regularly and what their health conditions were compared to the baseline. BCSs reported excessive fatigue, poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and reduced work ability; these parameters had not improved significantly compared to the baseline. Thematic analysis of the interviews confirmed the presence of personal, company, and societal factors that could hinder or favor RTW. The interviews demonstrated that, even in an economically developed country that has provided numerous benefits for BCSs, protection is not always effective. Personalized intervention seems necessary to complete the process of reintegrating BCSs into their future working careers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the situation and influencing factors of patients returning to work after spinal surgery, and to provide reference for clinical intervention measures of patients returning to work after spinal surgery. METHODS: A computer search was conducted in Chinese and English database on the situation and influencing factors of patients returning to work after spinal surgery from the establishment of the database to February 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and StataMP 17.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 10 literatures were included, involving 11,548 subjects. Meta-analysis results showed that 58% of patients returned to work after spinal surgery [95%CI (0.47-0.69)]. Gender [OR = 2.41, 95%CI (1.58-3.37)], age [OR = 1.32, 95%CI (1.03-1.51)], job nature [OR = 5.94, 95%CI (3.54-9.62)], education level [OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.06-0.48)], fear of disease progression [OR = 0.82, 95%CI (0.84-0.95)], and social support [OR = 1.21, 95%CI (1.12-1.37)] were the influencing factors for patients returning to work after spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: The rate of patients returning to work after spinal surgery is low, and is affected by many factors. Medical personnel should pay comprehensive attention to the above high-risk groups and give timely intervention and support.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Returning to work after long-term sick leave can be challenging, particularly in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) where support may be limited. Recognizing the responsibilities and challenges of SME employers, a web-based intervention (hereafter the SME tool) has been developed. The SME tool aims to enhance the employer's intention and ability to support the sick-listed employee. Based on the Self-Determination Theory, it is hypothesized that this intention is enhanced by intervening in the employer's autonomy, competences, and relatedness targeted at, e.g., communication with sick-listed employee, involvement of other stakeholders, and practical support. This is achieved by means of providing templates, communication videos, and information on legislation. This article describes the design of an effect and process evaluation of the SME tool. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted with a parallel-group design with two arms: an intervention group and a control group. Sick-listed employees (≤ 8 weeks) of SMEs (≤ 250 employees) at risk of long-term sick leave and their employers will be recruited and randomly allocated as a dyad (1:1). Employers randomized to the intervention group receive unlimited access to the SME tool, while those in the control group will receive care as usual. The primary outcome is the satisfaction of the employee with the return to work (RTW) support provided by their employer. Secondary outcomes include social support, work performance, and quality of work life at the employee level and self-efficacy in providing RTW support at the employer level. Outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. Process evaluation measures include, e.g., recruitment and use of and perceived usefulness of the SME tool. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with employers, employees, and occupational physicians will explore the interpretation of the RCT results and strategies for the national implementation of the SME tool. DISCUSSION: The SME tool is hypothesized to be valuable in addition to usual care helping employers to effectively support the RTW of their long-term sick-listed employees, by improving the employers' intention and ability to support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06330415. Registered on February 14, 2024.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Many barriers to breastfeeding upon return to the workplace are reported by female radiologists, which have implications on maternal/infant health and physician burnout. The Department of Radiology at our institution piloted an initiative to provide a free portable breast pump to address these barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous voluntary 32-question survey assessing the impact of the portable pump on postpartum work-life integration was sent to all female radiologists and radiologists-in-training in the department from May 2023 to July 2023. RESULTS: A total of 59 surveys were completed (65 % response rate). Overall, respondents reported a positive or very positive impact of the pump on transitioning back to work (median 4.5/5 on a 5-point Likert scale), on their decision to continue breastfeeding when returning to work (median 4/5), and duration of breastfeeding (median 4/5). Use of the pump was reported as favorable, with utilization of the pump while simultaneously engaging in clinical work (median 4.5/5) obviating necessity of dedicated lactation rooms, and positive impact on daily productivity (median score of 4/5). Nearly all (94 %, 16/17) users of the portable pump had their lactational needs addressed while returning to work, compared to 54 % (6/13) of those returning from leave prior to the pump initiative (p = 0.003). Compared to those utilizing traditional lactational resources, those who utilized the portable pump were significantly less likely to miss educational opportunities (0 % vs 44 %, p = 0.03), or academic engagements due to lactational practices at work (0 % v 44 %, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: A department-sponsored portable breast pump initiative proved to be an effective resource to support physician breastfeeding and work-life integration.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Metacarpal fractures produce significant hand disability, and non-operative management of these fractures can produce satisfactory functional outcomes with few complications. However, most studies assessing non-operative outcomes of metacarpal fractures revolves around metacarpals I and V, which possess different anatomy. Therefore, further investigation into outcomes after non-operative treatment of metacarpals II-IV is required to inform management decisions and allow modification of the rehabilitation protocols to specific fracture patterns. All records for 76 non-operative patients presenting with fractures of metacarpals II-IV to our tertiary centre in the year 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were treated with thermoplastic splinting or fibreglass casting with a rehabilitative exercise programme. Range of motion (ROM) of the Metacarpophalangeal (MCPJ), Proximal Interphalangeal (PIPJ), and Distal Interphalangeal joints (DIPJ), return to work time, and complications were assessed at 12 weeks post-treatment. Mean return to work time was 5.4 weeks, and patients did not report any serious adverse events; the main complication reported was tenderness on palpation (20%). The MCPJ exhibited the poorest ROM (9° flexion reduction relative to the healthy hand). Metacarpal II fractures were associated with significantly worse MCPJ flexion than metacarpal III (p = 0.022) and metacarpal IV (p = 0.049) fractures. Fractures of the metacarpal base were associated with superior MCPJ flexion (p = 0.004) but longer return to work time (p = 0.042) than head fractures. Spiral fractures were associated with shorter return to work time (p = 0.043) and superior ROM results (p = 0.041). In conclusion, outcomes of the non-operative treatment of metacarpal II-IV fractures are highly dependent on the location and pattern of the fracture, and this should be considered during clinical decision making.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Intensive care unit (ICU) stay for a serious illness has a long-term impact on patients' physical and psychological well-being, affecting their ability to return to their everyday life. We aimed to investigate whether there are differences in health status between those who return to work and those who do not, and how demographic characteristics and illness severity impact patients' ability to return to work 12 months after intensive care for COVID-19. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study. The participants were patients who had been in intensive care for COVID-19 and had worked before contracting COVID-19. Data on return to previous occupational status, demographic data, comorbidities, intensive care characteristics, and health status were collected at a 12-month follow-up visit. SETTING: General ICU at the Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants were included in the study. Twelve months after discharge from the ICU, 77 % (n = 56) had returned to work. The participants who were unable to return to work reported more severe health symptoms. The (odds ratio [OR] for not returning to work was high for critical illness OR, 12.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.07-70.29, p = 0.006) and length of ICU stay (OR, 1.06; 95 % CI, 1.01-1.11, p = 0.01) CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of the participants were able to return to work within 1 year after discharge from the ICU. The primary factors contributing to the failure to work were duration of the acute disease and presence of severe and persistent long-term symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients' health status must be comprehensively assessed and their ability to return to work should be addressed in the rehabilitation process. Therefore, any complications faced by the patients must be identified and treated early to increase the possibility of their successful return to work.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Work preservation is crucial for the reintegration of ex-prisoners and the prevention of recidivism. We describe the application of an interdisciplinary diagnostic protocol (occupational health visit, psychiatric interview, psychological counselling and testing) in the case of a dairy industry worker (female, 45-year-old), released on half-freedom after approximately a year of detention in prison for attempted murder. This crime can seriously hamper job resumption. The evaluation revealed a slightly depressed mood (consistent with recent life events), in the absence of major psychiatric disorders or other disturbances that could compromise working abilities or represent a danger for the coworkers. The patient was, therefore, judged able to resume her job. At six months follow-up, she had fully served her sentence and had returned to her previous job, with good relations with her colleagues. However, she encountered hostility from her employer, which induced her to find a new job as a secretary. Her mental health status was improved. The interdisciplinary approach described here may allow ex-prisoners to return to work by helping the company physician to formulate the judgement of job fitness, offering at the same time suggestions for a rational occupational reintegration.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Importance: Return to work after breast cancer (BC) treatment depends on several factors, including treatment-related adverse effects. While cancer-related cognitive impairment is frequently reported by patients with BC, to date, no longitudinal studies have assessed its association with return to work. Objective: To examine whether cognition, assessed using objective and subjective scores, was associated with return to work 2 years after BC diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a case series of the French Cancer Toxicities (CANTO) cohort, a study of patients with stage I to III BC investigated cognition from April 2014 to December 2018 (2 years' follow-up). Participants included women aged 58 years or younger at BC diagnosis who were employed or looking for a job. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was return to work assessed 2 years after BC diagnosis. Objective cognitive functioning (tests), cognitive symptoms, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were prospectively assessed at diagnosis (baseline), 1 year after treatment completion, and 2 years after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explain return to work status at year 2 according to each cognitive measure separately, adjusted for age, occupational class, stage at diagnosis, and chemotherapy. Results: The final sample included 178 women with BC (median age: 48.7 [range, 28-58] years), including 37 (20.8%) who did not return to work at year 2. Patients who returned to work had a higher (ie, professional) occupational class and were less likely to have had a mastectomy (24.1% vs 54.1%; P < .001). Return to work at year 2 was associated with lower overall cognitive impairment (1-point unit of increased odds ratio [1-pt OR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79; P = .01), higher working memory (1-pt OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.23-3.59; P = .008), higher processing speed (1-pt OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.20-3.36; P = .01) and higher attention performance (1-pt OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.64; P = .04), higher perceived cognitive abilities (1-pt OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21; P = .007), and lower depression (1-pt OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P = .001) at year 2 assessment. Return to work at year 2 was associated with several measures assessed at baseline and year 1: higher processing speed (1-pt OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.37-4.31; P = .003 and 1.95; 95% CI, 1.14-3.50; P = .02), higher executive performance (1-pt OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.28-5.75; P = .01, and 2.88; 95% CI, 1.36-6.28; P = .006), and lower physical fatigue (10-pt OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .009 and 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series study of patients with BC, return to work 2 years after diagnosis was associated with higher cognitive speed performance before and after BC treatment. Cognitive difficulties should be assessed before return to work to propose suitable management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated sustainability and multimorbidity alongside barriers to employment including health and policy to demonstrate intersectional impact on return-to-work success within a UK welfare-to-work programme. DESIGN: Cohort study design: The study calculated the proportion of time spent employed after experiencing a job start and the proportion retaining work over 6 months. Employment/unemployment periods were calculated, sequence-index plots were produced and visualisations were explored by benefit type and age. SETTING: This study used confidential access to deidentified data from unemployed Work Programme clients operated by Ingeus on behalf of the UK Government in Scotland between 1 April 2013 and 31 July 2014. PARTICIPANTS: 13 318 unemployed clients aged 18-64 years were randomly allocated to a Work Programme provider and monitored over 2 years. RESULTS: This study has two distinct groupings. 'Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)' corresponding to those with work-limiting disability in receipt of related state financial support, and 'Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA)' corresponding to unemployment claimants. Despite fewer and later job starts for ESA clients, those that gained employment spend relatively more subsequent time in employment when compared with individuals without work-limiting conditions (ESA clients under 50, 0.73; ESA clients over 50, 0.79; JSA clients under 50, 0.67 and JSA clients over 50, 0.68). Proportion in permanent jobs was higher among ESA than JSA clients (JSA under 50, 92%; JSA over 50, 92%; ESA under 50, 95% and ESA over 50, 97%). CONCLUSION: The research demonstrated that returning to paid employment after a reliance on welfare benefits is challenging for people aged over 50 and those with disability. The study found that although fewer older ESA claimants entered employment, they typically remained in employment more than JSA clients who did not leave the Work Programme early. This indicates the importance of identifying risk factors for job loss in ageing workers and the development of interventions for extension of working lives.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Common mental health problems, such as stress, anxiety and depression, are highly prevalent among workers and often lead to long-term absenteeism and work disability. Effective elements found in previous researched interventions were to explicitly focus on return to work (RTW) and not solely on symptom reduction, to take into account the employees' cognition towards RTW and to include the workplace environment. Based on these elements, a stepped-care approach was developed. The aim of this paper is to present the study design of a randomized controlled trial (RESTART), evaluating the effectiveness of the stepped-care approach on lasting RTW and the implementation process. METHODS: RESTART is a randomized controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design and a follow-up of one year. Employees eligible for this study are those who reported sick within 2 to 8 weeks with psychological distress based on a distress screener. Participants will be randomized to a group receiving a tailored e-Health app or usual care, as well as randomized to a group receiving a Participatory Approach (PA; conversational method) in the workplace or usual care. The PA will however only be provided in case of persistent sickness absence at 8 weeks. Measurements take place at baseline, after the e-Health intervention period (3 months), and after the PA intervention period (6 months) and 12 months. Primary outcome is lasting RTW, defined as full RTW in previous or equal work for at least four consecutive weeks. Secondary outcomes are (the severity of) stress-related symptoms, total number of sickness absence days, self-efficacy for RTW and self-reported health. A process evaluation including a realist evaluation will also be conducted. DISCUSSION: Early intervention that focuses on RTW, the cognition towards RTW despite symptoms and involves the workplace environment, plays a crucial role in managing sickness absence among employees with psychological distress. If effective, the stepped-care approach is relevant for employees, employers and society as a whole. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 90663076. Registered on 5 October 2023.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To identify the current status of return-to-work readiness and analyze its influencing factors among middle-aged and young postoperative lung cancer patients. From July 2022 to February 2023, a total of 144 middle-aged and young postoperative lung cancer patients who had been treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of West China Hospital, Sichuan University and had not returned to work were selected as the research subjects. A general information questionnaire, the Readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) were used for the survey. Univariate analysis and ordinal logistic regression analysis were used to assess the current status of work readiness and its influencing factors. The distribution of work readiness from high to low was as follows: behavioral preparation-self-assessment stage, intention stage, preintention stage, and behavioral preparation-action stage. Univariate analysis showed that age, place of residence, occupation, nature of work, average family income, scope of surgery, postoperative complications, surgical site, and primary coping strategies were statistically significant (P < .05). The ordinal logistic regression analysis revealed that patients engaged in mentally oriented work (odds ratio [OR] = 13.78, P < .001), with a monthly family income of ≥ 10,000¥ (OR = 6.28, P = .017), proactive coping strategies (OR = 4.84, P = .019), and higher self-efficacy (OR = 1.17, P < .001) had higher work readiness. Patients engaged in other industries (OR = 0.25, P = .028), agricultural, forestry, and fishing labor (OR = 0.08, P < .001), unemployed (OR = 0.12, P = .038), and with a monthly family income of < 1000¥ (OR = 0.07, P = .026) had lower work readiness. In overall, this study suggests that the work readiness of postoperative lung cancer patients needs improvement. Occupation, nature of work, average family income, primary coping strategies, and general self-efficacy are associated with return-to-work readiness among middle-aged and young postoperative lung cancer patients.

Asunto(s)