RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This cohort study aimed to describe the functional outcomes, complications, and mortality of patients over 65 with acute distal femur fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or distal femoral replacement (DFR). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients older than 65, operated consecutively for a distal femur fracture treated with ORIF or DFR. We included 75 patients (9 33A, 5 33B, and 61 33C AO/OTA fractures), 55 treated with ORIF, and 20 with DFR. We used Parker's mobility index (PMI) to assess functional outcomes at 1, 3, and 12 months and study closure. We analyzed complications, reoperations, and mortality at 30 days, one year, and at the end of the study. RESULTS: The PMI was significantly higher in the DFR group at months 1 (p = 0.023) and 3 (p = 0.032). We found no significant differences between cohorts at one year and the end of follow-up. Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent in the ORIF group (38.10% vs. 10%, p = 0.022). Reoperations were similar in both cohorts (p = 0.98). Mortality at one month was 4% and 20% at one year, and at the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study suggest that DFR offers a faster functional recovery with lower complication rates than those treated with ORIF. Additionally, both options have similar reoperation and mortality rates. Appropriately designed studies are needed to define the best treatment strategy for this type of patient.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Humanos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/mortalidad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Fracturas Femorales DistalesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report the functional results of our experience and to describe intraoperative findings and complications due to the techniques used in our service. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2022, 27 Pediatric patients aged from 8 to 16 years underwent surgery to treat proximal humerus fractures. Their demographic characteristics were evaluated, as well as their clinical characteristics on admission, type of reduction (closed/open), presence of interposition in open reductions, type of implant, complications, and functional range of movement according to two shoulder functional scores. RESULTS: Mean age was 11.2 years (8-15), there was a predominance of males, who accounted for 70% of the cases, and sports accidents were the cause of injury in 44% of the cases. Anatomical location was balanced between patients, including 55% of physeal fractures and 45% of metaphyseal ones. Overall, 81.5% of patients required open reduction to achieve axis correction, and that 55.5% of fractures were fixed with Kirschner wires, and 44, 4% with elastic titanium nails. Mean QuickDASH score was 0.58 (0-1.7), and Constant score was 9 (3-24). There were no major complications, but 27% of cases subjected to open reduction presented a hypertrophic scar. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures is successful, both with closed and open reduction; type of implant does not play a key role and should be selected based on the characteristics of each case. Surgical training should prevail at the time of decision-making. When these recommendations are followed, results can be excellent and sequelae are infrequent.
Asunto(s)
Hilos Ortopédicos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Fracturas del Hombro , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Fracturas del Hombro/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
RESUMEN Cronobacter sakazakii es una bacteria Gram negativa que pertenece a un grupo emergente de patógenos oportunistas de la familia de los Enterococos, que causa infecciones nosocomiales. Afecta típicamente a los recién nacidos de bajo peso; puede causar graves infecciones como meningitis, sepsis o enterocolitis necrotizante, potencialmente mortales, aunque la gran mayoría de las infecciones se producen en pacientes ancianos, en los que son mucho más leves. Se reporta el primer caso confirmado de infección de herida quirúrgica en España causada por C. sakazakii en un adulto inmunocompetente(AU)
ABSTRACT Cronobacter sakazakii is a Gram negative bacterium that belongs to an emerging group of opportunistic pathogens of the Enterococci family, which causes nosocomial infections. It typically affects low birth weight newborns. It can cause serious infections such as meningitis, sepsis, or life-threatening necrotizing enterocolitis, although the vast majority of infections occur in elderly patients, where they are much milder. We report the first confirmed case of surgical wound infection in Spain, caused by C. sakazakii in an immunocompetent adult(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Peroné/lesiones , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Introducción: Las fracturas del húmero distal corresponden al 2% de todas las fracturas. Son los pacientes más añosos, los que presentan mayor desafío terapéutico. Suelen presentarse con huesos osteoporóticos, lo que conlleva a producir fracturas con mayor conminución articular y metafisaria; así como también dificultar una fijación estable y rígida de las mismas, que permita una movilidad precoz. Estas características generan controversia a la hora de elegir el tratamiento adecuado. El objetivo de este estudio es revisar la bibliografía de la última década, acerca de cuál es la mejor opción terapéutica para las fracturas de húmero distal en pacientes añosos. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda sistematizada a través de los buscadores electrónicos PubMed y Timbó en agosto 2019. La búsqueda llego a un total de 475 artículos, de los cuales se seleccionaron 24 según criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Discusión: La mayoría de los estudios analizados son estudios de serie de casos retrospectivos. En los trabajos revisados, existen fracturas tanto extra como intra-articulares. Se analizaron los resultados de los distintos tratamientos realizados según parámetros clínicos, scores funcionales y complicaciones. Conclusiones: El tratamiento conservador es una opción válida para aquellos pacientes en los que el terreno no permita una intervención quirúrgica. Para las fracturas tipo extra-articulares y parcialmente articulares, la reducción abierta y fijación interna es el tratamiento de elección. Para las fracturas articulares completas, no hay diferencias significativas en cuanto a scores utilizados entre la reducción abierta y fijación interna con la artroplastia de codo. Faltan estudios prospectivos que comparen ambos tratamientos.
Introduction: Distal humerus fractures account for 2% of all fractures. It is the elderly patients who present the greatest therapeutic challenge. Osteoporotic bones, more common in this population, lead to the production of fractures with greater joint and metaphyseal comminution. As a result, stable and rigid fixation becomes more difficult, hindering early mobility. These characteristics generate controversy when choosing the appropriate treatment. The aim of this study is to review the literature of the last decade regarding the best therapeutic option for distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Methods: A systematized search was performed through the electronic search engines PubMed and Timbó in august 2019. The search reached a total of 475 articles, of which 24 were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discussion: Most of the studies analyzed are retrospective case series studies. In the articles reviewed, there are both extra and intra-articular fractures. The results of the different treatments performed were analyzed according to clinical parameters, functional scores and complications. Conclusions: Conservative treatment is a valid option for those patients where the terrain does not allow surgical intervention. For extra-articular and partial-articular fractures, open reduction and internal fixation is the treatment of choice. For complete articular fractures, there are no significant differences in scores used between open reduction and internal fixation and elbow replacement. There is a lack of prospective studies comparing both treatments.
Introdução: Fraturas do úmero distal correspondem a 2% de todas as fraturas. São os pacientes mais idosos os que apresentam maior desafio terapêutico. Geralmente apresentam-se com ossos osteoporóticos, o que implica produzir fraturas com maior cominuição articular e metafisária; assim como também dificultar uma fixação estável e rígida das mesmas, que permita uma mobilidade precoce. Estas características geram controvérsia na escolha do tratamento adequado. O objetivo deste estudo é rever a bibliografia da última década, sobre qual é a melhor opção terapêutica para fraturas de úmero distal em pacientes idosos. Materiais e métodos: Foi realizada uma pesquisa sistematizada através dos buscadores eletrônicos Pubmed e Timbó em agosto 2019. A pesquisa chegou a um total de 475 artigos, dos quais 24 foram selecionados segundo critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Discussão: A maioria dos estudos analisados são estudos de série de casos retrospectivos. Nos trabalhos revisados, existem fraturas tanto extra como intra-articulares. Foram analisados os resultados dos diferentes tratamentos realizados segundo parâmetros clínicos, scores funcionais e complicações. Conclusões: O tratamento conservador é uma opção válida para os pacientes em que o terreno não permita uma intervenção cirúrgica. Para fraturas tipo extra-articulares e parcialmente articulares, a redução aberta e fixação interna é o tratamento de escolha. Para fracturas articulares completas, não há diferenças significativas em termos de scores utilizados entre a redução aberta e a fixação interna com artroplastia do cotovelo. Faltam estudos prospectivos que comparem os dois tratamentos.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fijadores Externos/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Codo/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Fijación de Fractura/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Fracturas del Húmero/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Técnica de Ilizarov/efectos adversos , Reducción Cerrada/efectos adversos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18-65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). DISCUSSION: Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Reducción Abierta/instrumentación , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Tornillos Pediculares , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: Acute management of fractures of the distal ulna that are associated with fractures of the distal radius remains difficult, particularly in the elderly. Methods: In this study, we investigated whether internal fixation of the distal ulna is associated with a higher rate of complications than resection of the distal ulna in patients older than 70 years. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in this study, 12 of whom had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal ulna, and 12 who had undergone distal ulna resection. Patients were retrospectively assessed for range of motion, grip strength, pain, and radiographic appearance. The functional outcome was evaluated by the Mayo Wrist Score. Complications were classified according to the Classification of Surgical Complications. Results: There were no differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups, except patient age. Clinical evaluation showed no difference at follow-up; however, there were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared with resection. Conclusions: The results from our study show that women older than 70 years with fracture of the distal radius and distal ulna have a higher rate of complications if ORIF of the distal ulna is performed. Patients should be warned, by surgeons, of this in cases where ORIF of the distal ulna is suggested.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Fracturas del Cúbito/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Radiografía/métodos , Fracturas del Radio/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Radio/epidemiología , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cúbito/fisiopatología , Cúbito/cirugía , Fracturas del Cúbito/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Cúbito/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
There is uniform agreement in the literature that radial neck fracture with <30 degrees of angulation and minimal translation in younger children can be managed by casting alone, without the need for closed reduction. For more severe fractures, closed manipulation techniques followed by percutaneous reduction technique (in case closed reduction fails) should be performed before switching to an open reduction technique. Debate still exists regarding the best treatment protocol for severely displaced fractures. Although some surgeons favor open reduction with the argument that repeat manipulations may cause iatrogenic injuries, and stiffness, others believe that open reduction is one of the most contributing factors for poor outcome. On the basis of this paradigm, we present our treatment algorithm based on the data demonstrating that percutaneous reduction of displaced radial neck fractures achieve better results than open reduction.