RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bone radiation-induced sarcomas (B-RIS) are secondary neoplasms with reportedly worse overall survival than de novo bone sarcoma. Treatment strategy for these neoplasms remains uncertain. Our systematic review sought to assess overall survival based on histology and surgical intervention. METHODS: A systemic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (438415). Studies describing oncologic outcomes of patients with B-RIS in the appendicular and axial skeleton were included. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was used for quality assessment. Survival analysis by histologic subtype and surgery type was performed in a subset of 234 patients from 11 articles with individualized data. A total of 20 articles with a total of 566 patients were included. The most frequent location was the pelvis (27.7%), and the main histological types were osteosarcoma (69.4%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (14.1%), and fibrosarcoma (9.2%). Limb-salvage and amputation were performed in 68.5% and 31.5% of cases, respectively. RESULTS: Local recurrence was 13%, without difference between limb-salvage surgery and amputation (p = 0.51). The metastasis rate was 42.3%. Five-year OS was 43.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.3%-53.5%) for osteosarcoma, 31.5% (95% CI, 11.3%-54.2%) for UPS, and 28.1% (95% CI, 10.6%-48.8%) for fibrosarcoma. Five-year OS was 49.2% (95% CI, 35.3%-61.6%) for limb-salvage and 46.9% (95% CI, 29.1%-62.9%) for amputation. There was no difference in 5-year OS between histologic subtypes (p = 0.18) or treatment type (p = 0.86). CONCLUSION: B-RIS demonstrated poor OS at 5 years after initial management regardless of histology. Limb-salvage surgery was not associated with lower 5-year OS compared with amputation. Future studies should compare both groups while controlling for confounders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Sarcoma , Humanos , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/patología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/cirugía , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Femenino , Osteosarcoma/patología , Osteosarcoma/mortalidad , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Osteosarcoma/radioterapia , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , AdolescenteRESUMEN
CASE: Rotationplasty is a surgical procedure used for restoring functionality after skeletal tumor resection. Multiple complications have been described, including the potential occurrence of fractures. Literature on fracture management after rotationplasty is limited. In this article, we present 2 cases of late ipsilateral fractures in rotated limbs successfully treated with intramedullary nailing. CONCLUSION: Effective management of fractures after rotationplasty requires thorough understanding of the rotated limb anatomy and careful planning. The clinical considerations presented in this article aim to provide guidance for surgeons to achieve successful outcomes in the management of fractures after rotationplasty.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Femorales , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Neoplasias Femorales/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
Introducción. Los cirujanos ortopédicos y plásticos trabajaban por separado cuando se enfrentaban a casos reconstructivos desafiantes que involucraban la reconstrucción del tejido blando y esquelético. Cirugía Ortoplástica es el nombre dado a la asociación de Cirugía plástica y ortopédica. Objetivos. Describir el Enfoque Ortoplástico en traumatismos masivos de miembros y su importancia en el abordaje multidisciplinario de pacientes. Material y método. El presente es un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo, en el cual se describe un caso con una lesión masiva de miembro inferior, en el Parque de la Salud, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina, entre febrero y mayo del 2022. Reporte de caso: Se presenta un caso de una paciente femenina de 24 años de edad con lesión masiva por desguantamiento de extremidad inferior derecha producto de accidente en vía pública al ser arrastrada debajo de una unidad de transporte público. Discusión. El salvamento de la extremidad y la amputación temprana con soporte protésico son las dos modalidades empleadas para las formas extremas de traumatismo de la extremidad inferior, con poca claridad en cuanto a lo que el paciente debe esperar en términos de resultados de calidad de vida. Conclusión. La decisión de amputar o salvar una extremidad es compleja. Los cirujanos ortopédicos y plásticos involucrados en esta atención deben tener una comprensión clara del papel del otro y la importancia de cada uno para una buena resolución. Esto es lo que llamamos el Enfoque Ortoplástico de la cirugía reconstructiva de las extremidades.
Introduction. Orthopedic and plastic surgeons worked separately when faced with challenging reconstructive cases involving skeletal and soft tissue reconstruction. "Orthoplastic Surgery" is a name given to the Association of Orthopedic and Plastic Surgery. Objectives. Describe the Orthoplastic Approach in massive limb trauma and its importance in the multidisciplinary patient approach. Material and Method. This is a retrospective descriptive study, in which a case with a massive lower limb injury is described, in the Parque de la Salud, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina, between February 2022 and May 2022. Case Report. A case of a 24-year-old female patient with massive injury due to dismantling of the right lower extremity as a result of an accident on public roads when she was dragged under a public transport unit is presented. Discussion. Limb salvage and prosthetic supported early amputation are the two modalities employed for extreme forms of lower extremity trauma with little clarity as to what the patient should expect in terms of quality of life outcomes. Conclusion. The decision to amputate or save a limb is complex. The orthopedic and plastic surgeons involved in this care must have a clear understanding of each other's role and the importance of each for a good resolution. This is what we call the "Orthoplastic Approach" to reconstructive surgery of the extremities
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Calidad de Vida , Cirugía Plástica , Recuperación del Miembro , Lesiones por Desenguantamiento/cirugía , Amputación Traumática/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of limb hemodynamics using the ankle-brachial index (ABI) may be difficult due to skin lesions, extensive necrosis, and obesity, such as commonly present in patients with diabetes with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We hypothesized that the pedal acceleration time (PAT) correlates with ABI and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) scores in patients with diabetes to serve as a new modality to accurately stage CLTI. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional study included patients with and without diabetes > 18 years with CLTI. Limbs were categorized in three grades of ischemia based on the ABI (ABI < 0.8, < 0.6, and < 0.4) and in two classes based on WIfI stages of amputation risk. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine PAT sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to predict lower-limb ischemia. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients (67 nondiabetic and 74 diabetic) and 198 lower limbs (94 nondiabetic and 104 diabetic) met the inclusion criteria. In patients without diabetes, the accuracy of PAT for detecting an ABI < 0.8 was 85%; for detecting an ABI < 0.6 was 85%; and for detecting an ABI < 0.4 was 87%. In patients with diabetes, the accuracy of PAT in detecting an ABI < 0.8 was 91%; for detecting an ABI < 0.6 was 79%; and for detecting an ABI < 0.4 was 88%. In patients without diabetes, the accuracy for detecting WIfI stages of moderate and high amputation risk was 77% and for patients with diabetes was also 77%. CONCLUSIONS: PAT shows high correlation with the ABI as well as with the WIfI stages of amputation risk and the grades of ischemia, with high accuracy.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recuperación del Miembro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Isquemia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is currently no universal and uniform pattern of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the lower limbs; however, it is influenced by various cardiovascular factors of the individual. The objective of this study was to identify the arteriographic patterns of PAD in the lower limbs according to cardiovascular factors in a Peruvian cohort of patients. METHODS: This is an analytical, observational, and retrospective study. The arteriographic patterns of PAD in the aortoiliac segment were analyzed with the TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC-II) score and the Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) for the femoropopliteal (FP), infraopopliteal (IP), and pedial (P) segments in a Peruvian cohort from January 2018 to May 2021. RESULTS: 595 patients (833 extremities) were analyzed with a mean age of 67.54 ± 16.39 years, and the main cardiovascular factor was diabetes (65.04%). The patients older than 65 years with GLASS FP 4 (p = 0.042), IP 0 (p = 0.004), and P2 (p = 0.047) presented significant findings: in men and women with GLASS IP 4 (p = 0.031) and P 2 (p = 0.045); diabetes with TASC-II A (p = 0.031), GLASS FP 4 (p = 0.038), IP 4 (p = 0.009), and P2 (p = 0.003); dyslipidemia with TASC-II D (p = 0.027), GLASS FP 4 (p = 0.038), IP 0 (p = 0.009), and P0 (p = 0.003); smoking with TASC-II D (p = 0.001), GLASS FP 4 (p = 0.049) and IP 0 (p = 0.008); chronic coronary disease with GLASS IP 4 (p = 0.049) and P2 (p = 0.037); chronic kidney disease with GLASS FP 4 (p=0.047), IP 4 (p = 0.004), and P2 (p = 0.016); and previous amputation history with GLASS IP 4 (p = 0.015) and P2 (p = 0.039). The most frequent arteriographic pattern of PAD in the lower limbs of our cohort was TASC-II A, GLASS FP 0 and 4, IP 0, and P2 (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Our work will allow the limb salvage teams to understand the behavior of PAD affectation in the population of our environment, allowing a timely control of cardiovascular risk factors, adequate revascularization planning, and a significant reduction in the risk of loss of limb.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Arteria Poplítea , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Perú/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recuperación del Miembro , Isquemia/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in healthcare systems that impact the management of chronic diseases such as diabetic foot (DF). We hypothesized that lack of access to healthcare would increase the severity of disease and lead to worse outcomes. METHODS: The medical records of patients with DF were reviewed to determine demographic data and outcomes including wound healing, major amputation (MA), and death. Groups were divided into the pre-COVID-19 era (15 March 2019-15 March 2020) and the COVID-19 era (16 March 2020-16 March 2021); multivariable logistic analysis was performed to identify risk factors for MA. RESULTS: 261 patients with DF were included, 163 in the pre-COVID-19 era and 98 during the COVID-19 era. Patients in the COVID-19 presented with increased cardiovascular disease (19 vs 7%, p = 0.01), increased mean HbA1C (9.1 ± 2.1 vs 8.2 ± 2.1, p = 0.008) and higher WIFI-IV stage (78 vs 53%, p ≤ 0.0001). Patients with DF in the COVID-19 era were more likely to require MA (41 vs 21%, p ≤ 0.0001). Revascularization (OR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.038-0.38) was a protective factor to reduce MA. CONCLUSIONS: MA among DF patients increased two-fold during the COVID-19 era. Revascularization avoids MA in diabetic patients even during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that revascularization should be performed when possible.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/efectos adversos , Pandemias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Isquemia , Amputación Quirúrgica , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Latin American military vascular trauma is virtually unknown. The aim of this study was to describe severe war vascular trauma during the last 20 years of the Colombian armed conflict, and to identify predictors of limb amputation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a follow-up cohort from 1999 to 2019 of patients with associated severe vascular injuries (ISS >15) in the Colombian armed conflict treated at the Hospital Militar Central. RESULTS: Out of 5948 patients, 243 had military vascular trauma with 430 vascular injuries. The most frequent trauma mechanisms were gunshot wounds (n = 153; 63%). The most common injured vessels were femoral. 24 (10%) patients required amputations. Mortality was 4.1%. Amputation was associated with arteriovenous lesions (RR 4.82, p = 0.025), compartment syndrome (RR 4.2, p = 0.007), arteriovenous femoropopliteal injuries (RR 3.5, p = 0.0026), multiple arterial injuries (RR 3.35, p = 0.0218), associated fractures (RR 3.1, p = 0.0032). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant arteriovenous injuries in popliteal and femoropopliteal lesions, multiple arterial lesions, bone fractures, and compartment syndrome are associated with amputation in severe vascular injury.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismo Múltiple , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colombia/epidemiología , Recuperación del Miembro , Conflictos Armados , Amputación Quirúrgica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: parosteal osteosarcoma is an extramedullary malignant bone tumor in which cells produce osteoid, represents less than 5% of all osteosarcomas, it occurs predominantly in women between the second and fourth decade of life. It is often located in the distal region of the femur and proximal tibia. Clinically it presents with increased volume and thigh or knee pain. Due to its low incidence and clinical features, a clinical case of femoral parosteal osteosarcoma is presented, with description of the surgical technique performed. CASE REPORT: a 14-year-old female presented with a 6-month history of increased volume and right thigh pain. Radiological studies revealed a bone lesion with malignant characteristics, for which she was sent to third-level hospital where oncology study protocol was set up; consisting in two percutaneous biopsies of the lesion with Jamshidi needle, which were histopathology reported as negative for malignant cells. The pulmonary high-resolution computed tomography showed metastasis and a Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy showed increased osteoblastic activity in the right femoral shaft. Given the results, is confirmed the need of en-bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation with adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: the intercalary prosthesis is a suitable therapeutic option in limb-salvage surgery for patients with femoral parosteal osteosarcoma.
INTRODUCCIÓN: el osteosarcoma parostal es un tumor óseo maligno extramedular en el cual las células tumorales producen osteoide. Representa menos de 5% de los osteosarcomas. Se presenta predominantemente en la mujer, entre la segunda y cuarta década de la vida. Su localización más frecuente es la región distal del fémur y proximal de la tibia. Clínicamente, se manifiesta con aumento de volumen y dolor en muslo o rodilla. Debido a su baja incidencia y características clínicas, se presenta un caso clínico de osteosarcoma parostal femoral con descripción de la técnica quirúrgica realizada. CASO CLÍNICO: femenino de 14 años edad con cuadro clínico caracterizado por aumento de volumen y dolor en muslo derecho de seis meses de evolución. Se realizaron radiografías de fémur derecho, encontrando lesión ósea con características compatibles de malignidad, por lo que es enviada a unidad de tercer nivel para iniciar protocolo oncológico; se realizan dos biopsias percutáneas con aguja de Jamshidi, ambas con reporte histológico negativo para células malignas. En tomografía pulmonar de alta resolución se observó presencia de metástasis y la gammagrafía ósea con Tc99 reportó actividad osteoblástica en fémur derecho. Se decide tratamiento con resección en bloque y colocación de prótesis intercalar más quimioterapia adyuvante. CONCLUSIÓN: la prótesis intercalar resulta una opción terapéutica adecuada en la cirugía de salvamento de extremidad para pacientes con diagnóstico de osteosarcoma parostal femoral.
Asunto(s)
Miembros Artificiales , Neoplasias Óseas , Osteosarcoma Yuxtacortical , Osteosarcoma , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Fémur/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Osteosarcoma Yuxtacortical/cirugía , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , DolorRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to present patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) who underwent hybrid procedures at our institution, the results of these interventions for a 5-year period and determine patency, mortality, failure, and amputation rates compared to the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, single center, retrospective, and cross-sectional study which analyzed data gathered from the vascular quality initiative from patients who had hybrid revascularization procedures from January 2010 to December 2015. RESULTS: 87 patients were identified: 51 (58%) male, 36 (41%) female, 9 (10%) had critical limb ischemia (CLI), and 78 (90%) claudication. We analyzed results of hybrid interventions in their variations. Technical success rate was 100%, patency at 2 years 88.5% (primary 65%, primary-assisted 18.3%, and secondary 4.5%) and 11.49% failure rate (lost patency < 1 year, conversion to open or/and amputation). Predictors of failure were: Female, previous chronic heart failure, longer length of stay, and previously transferred from another hospital. Amputation rate was 12.6% (10.3% major and 2.2% minor amputation), the only significant predictor was age (p = 0.035, odds ratio = 0.89) (0.806-99). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid procedures are effective to treat patients with either CLI or claudication. Our study had outcomes comparable to the literature, with similar patency, amputation, and complication rates. We conclude it is a safe and effective option for PVD with multi-level disease.
OBJETIVO: Presentar pacientes con EAP que requirieron procedimientos híbridos en nuestra institución, resultados en 1 periodo de 5 años y determinar permeabilidad, mortalidad, falla y rangos de amputación comparado con la literatura. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional un céntrico, retrospectivo y transversal que analizó datos obtenidos del VQI de pacientes post-revascularización híbrida de Enero 2010 a Diciembre 2015. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 87 pacientes: 51 masculinos (58%) y 34 femeninos (41%). 9 (10%) presentaron isquemia crítica, 78 (90%) claudicación. Se analizaron resultados de dichas intervenciones en sus variaciones, con éxito técnico 100%, permeabilidad a 2 años 88.5% (primaria 65%, primaria asistida 18.3%, secundaria 4.5%) y 11.49% de falla (pérdida de permeabilidad < 1 año, conversión a cirugía abierta y/o amputación). Predictores de falla: femenino, IC, larga EIH, traslado de hospital previo). El rango de amputación fue 12.6% (10.3% mayor, 2-2% amputación menor) y el único predictor significativo fue edad (p = 0.035, OR = 0.89) (0.806-99). CONCLUSIONES: Los procedimientos híbridos son efectivos para tratar pacientes con isquemia crítica o claudicación. Nuestro estudio tuvo resultados similares a la literatura,permeabilidad, riesgo de amputación y complicaciones comparables con lo descrito. Concluimos que es una opción segura y efectiva para tratar pacientes con EAP multinivel.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Amputación Quirúrgica , Estudios Transversales , Claudicación Intermitente/etiología , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
Abstract Objective To evaluate the survival time, the failure rate and its causes, and the functional results of cemented endoprostheses, with a polyethylene body, used after resection of primary bone tumors of the distal femur. Methods A retrospective study including 93 primary and 77 review procedures performed between 1987 and 2014. Survival was obtained by the Kaplan Meyer analysis, and the risk factors for implant failure were assessed through the Cox proportional risk model. The causes of endoprosthesis failure were classified according to Henderson et al. into five types: soft-tissue failure, aseptic loosening, structural fracture, infection, and tumor recurrence. The functional evaluation was performed using the functional classification system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) of bone sarcomas of the lower extremity, Brazilian version (MSTS-BR). Results Osteosarcoma was the most common diagnosis; 64.5% of the patients were younger than 20 years of age; the mean follow-up was of 124.3 months. The failure rate of the primary implant was of 54.8%, and the mean survival was of 123 months. The estimated survival of the primary implant was of 63.6%, 43.5%, 24.1%, and 14.5% in 5, 10, 15, and 20 years respectively. The most common cause of failure was type 2 (37.3%). Age ≤ 26 years and right side were risk factors for failure. The mean MSTS-BR score was of 20.7 (range: 14 to 27). Conclusion The results obtained for the failure rate and survival of the implant are in accordance with those of the literature, so the procedure herein studied is adequate and yields satisfactory functional results, even in the long term.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o tempo de sobrevida, a taxa de falha e suas causas, e os resultados funcionais de endopróteses cimentadas, com corpo em polietileno, empregadas após ressecção de tumores ósseos primários do fêmur distal. Métodos Estudo retrospectivo, que incluiu 93 procedimentos primários e 77 de revisão, realizados entre 1987 e 2014. A sobrevida foi obtida pela análise de Kaplan Meyer, e os fatores de risco para falha do implante foram avaliados por meio do modelo de riscos proporcionais de Cox. As causas de falha da endoprótese foram classificadas segundo Henderson et al. em cinco tipos: falha de partes moles, soltura asséptica, fratura estrutural, infecção e recorrência do tumor. A avaliação funcional foi realizada por meio do sistema de classificação funcional da Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) para sarcomas ósseos da extremidade inferior, versão brasileira (MSTS-BR). Resultados Osteossarcoma foi o diagnóstico mais comum; 64,5% dos pacientes tinham menos de 20 anos; e o seguimento médio foi de 124,3 meses. A taxa de falha do implante primário foi de 54,8%, e a sobrevida média foi 123 meses. A estimativa de sobrevida do implante primário foi de 63,6%, 43,5%, 24,1%, 14,5% em 5, 10, 15 e 20 anos, respectivamente. A causa de falha mais comum foi a do tipo 2 (37,3%). Idade ≤ 26 anos e lado direito foram fatores de risco para falha. A pontuação média no MSTS-BR foi de 20,7 (variação: 14 a 27). Conclusão Os resultados obtidos para a taxa de falha e o tempo de sobrevida do implante estão de acordo com os da literatura, de forma que o procedimento estudado é adequado e apresenta resultados funcionais satisfatórios, inclusive em longo prazo.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Prótesis e Implantes , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recuperación del Miembro , Fémur/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate that simplified ERICVA (Valladolid Critical Limb Ischaemia Risk Scale) is useful in predicting amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLI) after one year of revascularization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. We analyzed the medical records of 93 patients over the age of 35 with the diagnosis of CLI who were treated in the Department of Internal Medicine, Orthopedics or in the Cardiovascular Surgery Unit of the Víctor Lazarte Echegaray Hospital and the High Complexity Virgen de La Puerta Hospital during the period 2015-2018. The simplified ERICVA score was determined in patients before surgical and endovascular revascularization. We included 31 patients who scored 2 or more points in the exposed group and 62 patients who scored less than 2 points in the group not exposed to amputation risk. The collected data was analyzed with the statistical program SPSS where the Relative Risk and significance was obtained with Pearson's Chi-square. The multivariate analysis was also carried out in order to obtain the adjusted relative risk. RESULTS: It was identified that the simplified ERICVA score greater than or equal to 2 points was more frequent in those who underwent amputation (90.3%) compared to patients who did not undergo amputation (4.8%), increasing the risk of amputation in those patients with CLI who underwent revascularization (RR: 18.67, P<0.001). It was also possible to identify that within the group of patients that showed a high risk of amputation according to the ERICVA scale, they had a higher risk of major amputation (RR: 9.32, P<0.001) as opposed to the risk of minor amputation (RR: 1, 89, P=0.193). Among the items of the simplified ERICVA scale, the preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and hematocrit were significantly higher in the group of amputated patients (P<0.001). In addition, it was possible to identify that the score greater than or equal to 2 was independently associated with the risk of amputation in patients revascularized with CLI (RR: 13.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In our patient population, the simplified ERICVA scale is useful in predicting major and minor amputation in critical limb ischemia after revascularization. The present data showed that the patients who had a simplified ERICVA score greater than or equal to 2 had a higher risk of major amputation compared to the risk of minor amputation. However, it is important to highlight that the impact on the prediction of minor amputation is greater because in some circumstances major amputation can appear as a complication of CLI.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Peripheral arterial disease is atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity arteries and afflicts hundreds of millions of individuals worldwide. Its most severe manifestation is chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Petersen et al. (Science 300(5622):1140-2, 2003)), which is associated with severe pain at rest in the limbs, which progresses to necrosis, limb amputation, and/or death of the patient. Consequently, the care of these patients is considered a financial burden for both patients and health systems. Multidisciplinary endeavors are required to address this refractory disease and to find definitive solutions that lead to improved living conditions. Revascularization is the cornerstone of therapy for preventing limb amputation, and both open vascular surgery and endovascular therapy play a key role in the treatment of patients with CLI. Around one-third of these patients are not candidates for conventional surgical treatment, however, leading to higher amputation rates (approaching 20-25% at one year) with high morbidity and lower quality of life. Advances in regenerative medicine have enabled the development of cell-based therapies that promote the formation of new blood vessels. Particularly, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as an attractive therapeutic agent in various diseases, including CLI, due to their role in tissue regeneration and immunomodulation. This review discusses the characteristics of MSCs, as well as their regenerative properties and their action mechanisms on CLI.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación del Miembro , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Humanos , Isquemia/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Great efforts have been made to choose between bypass surgery and angioplasty as the first choice for revascularisation in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Endovascular therapy predominates despite limited evidence for its advantages. The purpose of this observational cohort study was to investigate outcomes after open and endovascular infrapopliteal revascularisation in extensive infrainguinal arterial disease. METHODS: The medical records of 1 427 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularisation exclusively for CLTI in the period January 2014 to February 2019 were reviewed. After detailed analysis, only infrapopliteal revascularisations classified as GLASS stage II or III were considered, resulting in 326 procedures. In total, 127 patients underwent endovascular therapy and 199 patients underwent bypass graft surgery (BGS). The primary endpoints included amputation free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the analyses of multiple factors related to long term AFS. RESULTS: Regarding the primary endpoint, AFS was 75.2% and 65.2% at one and three years, respectively. OS at one and three years was 91.2% and 83.1%, respectively. In the univariable analysis, the hazard of the combined endpoint of major amputation or death was higher after bypass surgery than after endovascular therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 - 2.89; p = .013). After either revascularisation method, TASC II femoropopliteal D was associated with a higher risk of amputation or death (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.10 - 2.58; p = .015). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed no association between the variables analysed for AFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with CLTI submitted to infrapopliteal revascularisation and classified as GLASS II and III had satisfactory AFS and OS rates after an individualised team conference decision. Furthermore, the revascularisation modality (endovascular or open) did not influence the AFS results.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Injerto Vascular , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Humanos , Isquemia , Recuperación del Miembro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Single segment great saphenous vein (GSV) is the preferred conduit in infrainguinal bypass. Alternative autologous conduits (AAC) and nonautologous biologic conduits (NABC) are thought to be a better alternative to traditional prosthetic conduits (PC) in the absence of GSV. In this study we analyzed the outcomes of these alternative conduits in lower extremity bypasses (LEB) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative LEB database from 2003 to 2020 was queried for this study, to identify LEB in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Primary outcomes were graft patency, major adverse limb events (MALE), and MALE-free survival at 1 year. Standard statistical methods were used as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 22,671 LEB procedures (12,810 GSV, 6002 PC, 1907 AAC, and 1952 NABC). Compared with the GSV group, the other conduit patients were significantly older, had more comorbidities, had an increased rate of prior lower extremity interventions, had a higher rate of infrageniculate bypass targets, and were less ambulatory at baseline. The PC, AAC, and NABC groups had significantly higher rates of postoperative morbidity compared with the GSV group. The PC group had a higher 30-day mortality compared with the GSV, AAC, and NABC groups (3% PC vs 2% GSV, 2% AAC, 2% NABC; P = .049). Both PC and NABC had higher 1-year mortality compared with GSV and AAC (13% PC and 13% NABC vs 10% GSV, 10% AAC; P = .02). In an adjusted Cox regression model (stratified by infrageniculate target and adjusted for age, comorbidities, and prior vascular interventions) PC was not significantly different from GSV, but AAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.67; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.61-2.25; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of loss of primary patency. A similar association with MALE was observed: both AAC (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.15-1.58; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.53-2.11; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of MALE compared with GSV; PC was not significantly different from GSV. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of GSV, alternative conduits (autologous or nonautologous biologic) do not confer a benefit with regard to graft patency or MALE compared with PCs. Increased operating time or costs associated with the use of these conduits is not justified based on this study.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Humanos , Isquemia , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The calcium score is a measure of vessel wall calcification and has clinical applications when studied in different vascular beds. The presence of vascular calcification in the arteries of the lower limbs is very common in patients with peripheral arterial disease; however, its relationship with the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lower limb revascularization is still poorly studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate association between the calcium score of lower limbs and the postoperative outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing revascularization procedures. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed 88 lower limb revascularization procedures in 72 patients with critical limb ischemia who had enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation. The calcium score was calculated, from the angiographic phase of preoperative computed tomography, in the segments of the aorta, iliac, femoropopliteal, and infrapopliteal. It was also calculated the calcium score of the operated limb, and the total calcium score using a standardized method. The outcomes evaluated were the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction, amputation, patency, technical success, and death from any cause. Patients were followed up through a 12 month period. RESULTS: Among the 88 procedures performed, 31 (43.1%) lesions were classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document II D. There were 66 (75%) endovascular procedures, 16 (18.2%) open surgery, and 6 (6.8%) hybrid interventions. No statistically significant relationship was found between the calcium score of the segments (aorta, iliac, femoropopliteal, infrapopliteal, the operated limb, and total calcium score) and the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction, amputation, patency, and technical success in any of the periods analyzed. The calcium score of the operated limb was higher in patients who died within 30 days and 6 months (6571 vs 2590.6; p=0.026) and (5227.8 vs 2335.3; p=0.036). CONCLUSION: A standardized calcium score calculation method with the angiographic phase of the computed tomography is feasible and reproducible. Higher values of the calcifications of the operated limb are related to a greater chance of death in the postoperative period. The calcium score of the operated limb can be considered as a marker of clinical severity and prognosis in this group of patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Infarto del Miocardio , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Calcificación Vascular , Calcio , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have demonstrated an increased risk of developing cardiovascular and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the effect of chronic HIV infection in patients with preexisting PAD and requiring vascular intervention is unclear. In the present study, we assessed the differences in clinical presentation and perioperative outcomes for patients with PAD who had undergone revascularization or amputation with and without HIV infection. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, Clinical Modification, codes were used to identify patients with a prior diagnosis of PAD who had undergone lower extremity revascularization or amputation in the National Inpatient Sample (2003-2017). From this group, the patients were divided for analysis into those with and without HIV infection. Of the patients with HIV infection (PWHs), we identified additional subsets of patients: those with any prior or current diagnosis of an HIV-related illness, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, designated as symptomatic HIV, and those without such a diagnosis, designated as asymptomatic HIV infection. Propensity score matching was performed to create matched cohorts. Population-based comparative analyses were performed of the clinical characteristics of the HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of the perioperative in-hospital outcomes were performed on the matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 224,912 patients aged 18 to 85 years were identified who had been admitted with an established diagnosis of PAD and had undergone a lower extremity procedure. Of these patients, 1264 (0.56%) also had a diagnosis of HIV infection. Symptomatic PWHs were more likely to present with critical limb ischemia than were the HIV-uninfected patients or asymptomatic PWHs (66.2% vs 46.3% and 43.6%; P < .01). However, both asymptomatic and symptomatic PWHs were more likely to have required minor (7.5% and 6.7% vs 2.6%; P < .01) and major (12.9% and 27.4% vs 7.0%; P < .01) amputations than were matched HIV-uninfected controls. Although adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated symptomatic HIV infection to be a significant, independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-4.40; P = .003), the perioperative mortality for the asymptomatic PWH was comparable to that of matched HIV-uninfected controls. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic PWHs, including patients living with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, who had required a PAD-related procedure had presented with more advanced vascular disease and were most at risk of early perioperative mortality. However, the presentation and mortality between asymptomatic PWHs with well-controlled disease and HIV-uninfected patients were comparable. All PWHs with PAD were more likely to undergo lower extremity amputations than were HIV-uninfected matched controls. Asymptomatic, well-controlled HIV infection should not be a contraindication to elective PAD-related procedures because the mortality was similar to that of HIV-uninfected controls. However, the limb salvage rates might be lower for all PWHs with PAD, regardless of HIV disease severity. Taken together, these findings can improve perioperative risk stratification and surgical management of PAD in this high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Extremidad Inferior , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Isquemia , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Several wound classification systems are used to assess diabetic foot wounds. The recommendations for their use depend on the authors and foot associations. In this study, we compared Saint Elian score system, WIfI classification and Texas in 101 patients with foot wounds, and we followed them for a median of 149 days, finding differences both in the assigned risk and in the association with major amputation and wound healing. Saint Elian and WIfI scores match when Saint Elian is low or high risk but not when it is moderate. WIfI stages correlate with major amputation and wound healing. Saint Elian III correlates with major amputation. Prevalence of major amputations was 41% for WIfI 4 and 83% for Saint Elian III. WIfI 1 and 2 and Saint Elian I had a rate of wound healing of 80% to 85%. Stages 1 and 2 of WIfI score behave similar with regard to wound healing, 82% and 80% (P = .71), and major amputation, 0% and 10% (P = .68). Stages I and II of Saint Elian have the same rates of major amputation, 0% and 8% (P = .66), but not of wound healing, 85% and 51% (P < .05). The optimal cut point for detecting major amputation in Saint Elian is 18, with a sensitivity of 90.9 and specificity of 84.9, but there is no recommended cut point for wound healing. These classifications are validated for their use in diabetic foot wounds and to assess amputation risk, helping physicians make decisions and talk to the patients about prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Amputación Quirúrgica , Diabetes Mellitus/cirugía , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Recuperación del Miembro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
Resumo Pacientes portadores de doença arterial obstrutiva periférica com isquemia crítica do membro associada a infecção de prótese vascular apresentam elevadas taxas morbimortalidade e alto risco de perda do membro. Apresentamos o caso de um paciente masculino de 76 anos com isquemia crítica do membro inferior esquerdo associada a infecção de prótese vascular femoropoplítea. Utilizamos abordagem híbrida para o tratamento com acesso cirúrgico das regiões inguinais e poplíteas, sendo a prótese vascular utilizada como acesso endovascular para recanalização direta da artéria femoral superficial devido a obstrução longa e extensa calcificação, que impediram as tentativas iniciais de tratamento endovascular. Após a recanalização endovascular, a prótese infectada foi retirada. O avanço das técnicas e materiais endovasculares em associação com a cirurgia aberta permitem novas soluções para pacientes quando os procedimentos habituais falham.
Abstract Patients with severe arterial obstructive disease and critical limb ischemia associated with vascular graft infection have elevated morbidity and mortality rates and are at high risk of limb loss. We present the case of a 76-year-old male patient with left lower limb critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal vascular graft infection. We used a hybrid treatment approach with an open surgical approach to the inguinal and popliteal regions and used the vascular prosthesis as endovascular access for direct recanalization of the superficial femoral artery, because the long occlusion and extensive calcification had frustrated initial attempts at endovascular treatment. After endovascular recanalization, the infected graft was removed. Used in conjunction with open surgery, advances in endovascular techniques and materials offer new solutions for patients when usual procedures fail.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/cirugíaRESUMEN
RESUMO Contexto A doença arterial obstrutiva periférica apresenta alta prevalência, sendo associada a elevado risco de eventos cardiovasculares. A intervenção cirúrgica ou endovascular faz-se necessária na isquemia crítica do membro. Objetivos Avaliar a distribuição de realização de revascularizações abertas e endovasculares nas diferentes regiões do Brasil, analisando os custos para o sistema de saúde e a mortalidade relacionada a esses procedimentos. Métodos Foi realizado um estudo epidemiológico observacional transversal descritivo para avaliar as cirurgias abertas e endovasculares realizadas no sistema público de saúde do Brasil entre 2010 e 2020. Os dados foram coletados através do Departamento de Informática do SUS (Datasus). Resultados No período analisado, foram registradas 83.218 internações para realização de cirurgias abertas e endovasculares, com um custo total de R$ 333.989.523,17. Houve predominância das internações para os procedimentos percutâneos (56.132) em relação aos cirúrgicos convencionais (27.086). As Regiões Sudeste e Sul concentraram a maior parte do total de procedimentos realizados no país (83%), enquanto a Região Norte foi a que apresentou a menor taxa de internação. Observou-se uma tendência decrescente para os procedimentos abertos, e uma tendência crescente para os endovasculares. A média de permanência hospitalar foi menor nos procedimentos endovasculares (5,3 dias) em relação aos abertos (10,2 dias). Além disso, notou-se uma maior taxa de mortalidade hospitalar relacionada à revascularização aberta em relação à endovascular (5,24% versus 1,56%). Conclusões As técnicas endovasculares consistiram em uma abordagem dominante no tratamento cirúrgico da isquemia crítica, apresentando menor taxa de mortalidade hospitalar e menor tempo de internação quando comparada às cirurgias abertas.
ABSTRACT Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has high prevalence and is associated with high risk of cardiovascular events. Surgical or endovascular intervention is necessary in chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Objectives To evaluate the distribution of open and endovascular revascularizations in different regions of Brazil, analyzing the health system costs and mortality related to these procedures. Methods A descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, epidemiological study was carried out to evaluate open and endovascular surgeries performed on the SUS public healthcare system in Brazil, from 2010 to 2020. Data were collected from the SUS Department of Informatics (Datasus). Results Over the period analyzed, 83,218 admissions for open and endovascular surgeries were registered, with a total cost of R$ 333,989,523.17. There were more hospital admissions for percutaneous procedures (56,132) than for conventional surgery (27,086). Most of the procedures (83%) were performed in the country's Southeast and South regions, while the North region had the lowest number of procedures. Over the period evaluated, there was a decreasing trend for open procedures and an increasing trend for endovascular procedures. The average hospital stay was shorter for endovascular procedures (5.3 days) than for open surgery (10.2 days). The analysis of mortality related to these procedures revealed a higher rate of in-hospital mortality associated with open revascularization than with endovascular (5.24% vs. 1.56%). Conclusions Endovascular techniques constituted the primary approach for revascularization treatment in critical limb-threatening ischemia, with a lower in-hospital mortality rate and shorter hospital stay when compared to open surgeries.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudio Comparativo , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios Transversales , Costos de Hospital , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
Open traumatic lesion of the popliteal artery is relatively rare. Ischemia time longer than 6 h and severity of limb ischemia have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of limb loss. Severe local infection is critical in the presence of major soft tissue trauma or open fractures. We report the case of a young female who suffered a traumatic transection of the popliteal artery associated with an open fracture of the distal tibia and fibula managed by direct vessel reconstruction with an end-to-end repair and skeletal stabilization initially with half-pin external fixation, then replaced by an Ilizarov circular frame. The patient had a very satisfactory outcome, but the fracture healed malunited, later corrected by open reduction and internal fixation with lag-screwing and a neutralization plate.