Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Eur Biophys J ; 52(4-5): 233-266, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36792822

RESUMEN

Proper interpretation of analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) data for purified proteins requires ancillary information and calculations to account for factors such as buoyancy, buffer viscosity, hydration, and temperature. The utility program SEDNTERP has been widely used by the AUC community for this purpose since its introduction in the mid-1990s. Recent extensions to this program (1) allow it to incorporate data from diffusion as well as AUC experiments; and (2) allow it to calculate the refractive index of buffer solutions (based on the solute composition of the buffer), as well as the specific refractive increment (dn/dc) of proteins based on their composition. These two extensions should be quite useful to the light scattering community as well as helpful for AUC users. The latest version also adds new terms to the partial specific volume calculations which should improve the accuracy, particularly for smaller proteins and peptides, and can calculate the viscosity of buffers containing heavy isotopes of water. It also uses newer, more accurate equations for the density of water and for the hydrodynamic properties of rods and disks. This article will summarize and review all the equations used in the current program version and the scientific background behind them. It will tabulate the values used to calculate the partial specific volume and dn/dc, as well as the polynomial coefficients used in calculating the buffer density and viscosity (most of which have not been previously published), as well as the new ones used in calculating the buffer refractive index.


Asunto(s)
Química Analítica , Dispersión de Radiación , Ultracentrifugación , Ultracentrifugación/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Química Analítica/normas , Proteínas/química
3.
Bioanalysis ; 14(3): 169-185, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34894755

RESUMEN

Analyzing unstable small molecule drugs and metabolites in blood continues to be challenging for bioanalysis. Although scientific countermeasures such as immediate cooling, immediate freezing, addition of enzyme inhibitors, pH adjustment, dried blood spot or derivatization have been developed, selecting the best practices has become an issue in the pharmaceutical industry as the number of drugs with such problems is increasing, even for generic drugs. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive literature review and a questionnaire survey to determine a suitable practice for evaluating instability and implementing countermeasures. Three areas of focus, matrix selection, effect of hemolysis and selection of esterase inhibitors, are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Bioensayo/métodos , Química Analítica/normas , Humanos , Japón , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Plant Commun ; 1(3): 100047, 2020 05 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33367242

RESUMEN

One of the hottest topics in plant hormone biology is the crosstalk mechanisms, whereby multiple classes of phytohormones interplay with each other through signaling networks. To better understand the roles of hormonal crosstalks in their complex regulatory networks, it is of high significance to investigate the spatial and temporal distributions of multiple -phytohormones simultaneously from one plant tissue sample. In this study, we develop a high-sensitivity and high-throughput method for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of 44 phytohormone compounds, covering currently known 10 major classes of phytohormones (strigolactones, brassinosteroids, gibberellins, auxin, abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, cytokinins, ethylene, and polypeptide hormones [e.g., phytosulfokine]) from only 100 mg of plant sample. These compounds were grouped and purified separately with a tailored solid-phase extraction procedure based on their physicochemical properties and then analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The recoveries of our method ranged from 49.6% to 99.9% and the matrix effects from 61.8% to 102.5%, indicating that the overall sample pretreatment design resulted in good purification. The limits of quantitation (LOQs) of our method ranged from 0.06 to 1.29 pg/100 mg fresh weight and its precision was less than 13.4%, indicating high sensitivity and good reproducibility of the method. Tests of our method in different plant matrices demonstrated its wide applicability. Collectively, these advantages will make our method helpful in clarifying the crosstalk networks of phytohormones.


Asunto(s)
Química Analítica/normas , Cromatografía Liquida/normas , Eficiencia , Guías como Asunto , Reguladores del Crecimiento de las Plantas/análisis , Extracción en Fase Sólida/normas , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
7.
São Paulo; Cengage Learning; 9. ed; 2014. 950 p.
Monografía en Portugués | LILACS, Coleciona SUS | ID: biblio-941631
10.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 405(24): 7615-42, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780223

RESUMEN

Fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and iodine have been studied in biological samples and other related matrices owing to the need to understand the biochemical effects in living organisms. In this review, the works published in last 20 years are covered, and the main topics related to sample preparation methods and analytical techniques commonly used for fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and iodine determination in biological samples, food, drugs, and plants used as food or with medical applications are discussed. The commonest sample preparation methods, as extraction and decomposition using combustion and pyrohydrolysis, are reviewed, as well as spectrometric and electroanalytical techniques, spectrophotometry, total reflection X-ray fluorescence, neutron activation analysis, and separation systems using chromatography and electrophoresis. On this aspect, the main analytical challenges and drawbacks are highlighted. A discussion related to the availability of certified reference materials for evaluation of accuracy is also included, as well as a discussion of the official methods used as references for the determination of halogens in the samples covered in this review.


Asunto(s)
Bioensayo/normas , Química Analítica/normas , Halógenos/análisis , Animales , Bioensayo/tendencias , Halógenos/química , Humanos
12.
Drug Test Anal ; 4 Suppl 1: 17-24, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22851356

RESUMEN

The challenges facing analytical laboratories today are not unlike those faced in the past, although both the degree of complexity and the rate of change have increased. Challenges such as development and maintenance of expertise, maintenance and up-dating of equipment, and the introduction of new test methods have always been familiar themes for analytical laboratories, but international guidelines for laboratories involved in the import and export testing of food require management of such changes in a context which includes quality assurance, accreditation, and method validation considerations. Decisions as to when a change in a method requires re-validation of the method or on the design of a validation scheme for a complex multi-residue method require a well-considered strategy, based on a current knowledge of international guidance documents and regulatory requirements, as well the laboratory's quality system requirements. Validation demonstrates that a method is 'fit for purpose', so the requirement for validation should be assessed in terms of the intended use of a method and, in the case of change or modification of a method, whether that change or modification may affect a previously validated performance characteristic. In general, method validation involves method scope, calibration-related parameters, method precision, and recovery. Any method change which may affect method scope or any performance parameters will require re-validation. Some typical situations involving change in methods are discussed and a decision process proposed for selection of appropriate validation measures.


Asunto(s)
Química Analítica/normas , Análisis de los Alimentos/métodos , Análisis de los Alimentos/normas , Laboratorios/normas , Estudios de Validación como Asunto , Química Analítica/economía , Análisis de los Alimentos/economía , Laboratorios/economía
13.
Drug Test Anal ; 4 Suppl 1: 25-7, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22851357

RESUMEN

Laboratories involved in the analyses of veterinary drug residues are under increasing pressure to demonstrate that they produce meaningful and reliable data. Quality assurance and quality control systems are implemented in laboratories to provide evidence of this and these are subject to external assessment to ensure that they are effective. Audits to ISO/IEC 17025:2005, an internationally accepted standard, and subsequent accreditation provide laboratories and their customers with a degree of assurance that the laboratories are operating in control and the data they report can be relied on. However, national or regional authorities may place additional requirements on laboratories to ensure quality data are reported. For example, in the European Union, all official control laboratories involved in veterinary drug residue analyses must also meet the requirements of European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC which sets performance criteria for analytical methods used in this area and these are subject to additional audits by national or regional authorities. All audits place considerable time and resource demands on laboratories and this paper discusses the burden audits place on laboratories and describes a UK initiative to combine these audits to the benefit of both the regulatory authority and the laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Química Analítica/normas , Análisis de los Alimentos/normas , Laboratorios/normas , Drogas Veterinarias/análisis , Acreditación , Química Analítica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Unión Europea , Análisis de los Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Laboratorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Calidad
14.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 215(2): 233-7, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21940207

RESUMEN

In 1955 the Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK Commission) was founded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). The Commission is responsible for analysing health risks by chemical exposure at the workplace and for advising public authorities accordingly. Within the Commission, the working group "Analyses of Hazardous Substances in Biological Materials" (AiBM) deals with the development of procedures to analyse chemical substances in biological materials. Most of these detailed, ready-to-use protocols for human biomonitoring, do not only enable the monitoring of occupational exposure, but also the determination of the background exposure in the general population. The AiBM working group applies a multi-stage process to develop and evaluate human biomonitoring methods. As a matter of special importance, every method is tested by at least one examiner to ensure reproducibility of the analytical procedure and of the reliability data. Submitted methods and examination reports are discussed within the working group. The positively proved methods, if satisfactory, are adopted for publication. Otherwise, they are given back to the author with the demand for revision. In case of fundamental drawbacks, methods are rejected. The adopted methods are published in German and in English at regular intervals. Since 1985 the working group has published 129 analytical methods (plus 11 methods for markers of susceptibility) in 12 issues of the English edition. The detection limits of eighty methods allow the analyses of background exposure for one or more parameters. About forty methods were specially designed for the application in population studies. Particularly relevant method examples are the determination of the metabolites of organophosphate pesticides, pyrethroides and phthalates in urine as well as the determination of perfluorinated compounds and polychlorinated biphenyls in serum.


Asunto(s)
Química Analítica/normas , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Sustancias Peligrosas/sangre , Sustancias Peligrosas/orina , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , Gobierno Federal , Alemania , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Práctica de Salud Pública , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo
15.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci ; 877(23): 2214-23, 2009 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19144574

RESUMEN

The transfer of a method from a laboratory to a production site is an important step in the development cycle of new pharmaceutical products. Method transfers are increasingly implemented due to the economical pressure coming from the rationalization of production sites, analytical subcontracting and fusion of pharmaceutical groups. However, no official guidance regarding study design, data analysis, or decision procedures is present neither in FDA documents nor in ICH documents for method transfers. The experiments performed in such a transfer and the methodology used to accept or reject it should be fitted for purpose. In order to provide to analysts a global view of the problematic of analytical method transfer, this paper reviews the documentation available in the scientific literature about the design of transfer studies and the required sample size. Special focus is also made on the statistical methodologies available for decision making with particular emphasis on risk management. Examples of transfer of pharmaceutical, bio-pharmaceutical and biological methods published in the literature are reviewed in order to illustrate the various possibilities among the strategies for methods transfer.


Asunto(s)
Química Analítica , Guías como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Transferencia de Tecnología , Química Analítica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Química Analítica/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Tecnología Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Estados Unidos
19.
Anal Chem ; 73(19): 517A, 2001 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11605858
20.
Nat Toxins ; 7(6): 347-52, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11122528

RESUMEN

This article reviews current requirements for the analysis for mycotoxins in foods and identifies legislative as well as other factors that are driving development and validation of new methods. New regulatory limits for mycotoxins and analytical quality assurance requirements for laboratories to only use validated methods are seen as major factors driving developments. Three major classes of methods are identified which serve different purposes and can be categorized as screening, official and research. In each case the present status and future needs are assessed. In addition to an overview of trends in analytical methods, some other areas of analytical quality assurance such as participation in proficiency testing and reference materials are identified.


Asunto(s)
Industria de Alimentos/normas , Microbiología de Alimentos/normas , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/normas , Micotoxinas/análisis , Química Analítica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Química Analítica/normas , Unión Europea , Industria de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Microbiología de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Calidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA