Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Femina ; 52(1): 49-56, 20240130. ilus
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-1532477

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Averiguar qual o papel desempenhado pelas dimensões ósseas da pelve em relação à gênese do prolapso de órgãos pélvicos por meio de publicações dos últimos quinze anos. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de estudos ob- servacionais para avaliação de risco e prognóstico por meio de um levantamento bibliográfico virtual de artigos científicos publicados em revistas digitais entre os anos 2007 e 2022, nas bases de dados PubMed, BVS e ScienceDirect. Resultados: Uma área pélvica anterior mais ampla e um maior diâmetro interespinhoso foram caracterizados como possíveis causas para prolapso de órgãos pélvicos. A maior parte dos estudos contou com mensurações ósseas diversificadas, nas quais as demais dimensões não apresentaram significância estatística. Conclusão: Os estu- dos avaliados nesta revisão sugerem uma nova medida do assoalho pélvico rela- cionada a mulheres com prolapso, com apresentação de uma maior área anterior, em grande parte influenciada pelo diâmetro interespinhoso, o qual leva a um au- mento da carga sobre o assoalho pélvico. Porém, ainda assim, urge a necessidade de mais estudos para corroborar nossos achados.


Objective: To investigate the role played by the bone dimensions of the pelvis in relation to the genesis of pelvic organ prolapses through publications from the last fifteen years. Methods: This is a systematic review of obser- vational studies for risk assessment and prognosis through a virtual bibliographic survey of scientific articles published in digital journals between 2007 and 2022, in PubMed, BVS and ScienceDirect databases. Results: A wider anterior pelvic area and a larger interspinous diameter were characterized as possible causes for pelvic organ prolapses. Most of the studies have diversified bone measurements, in which the other dimensions weren't statistically significant. Conclusion: The studies evaluated in this review suggest a new measure- ment of the pelvic floor related to women with prolapse, with a larger anterior area, largely influenced by the interspinous diameter, which leads to an increased load on the pelvic floor. However, even so, there is an urgent need for further studies to corroborate our findings.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Huesos Pélvicos/anatomía & histología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/diagnóstico , Incontinencia Urinaria , Salud de la Mujer , Diafragma Pélvico/anatomía & histología , Incontinencia Fecal , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(9): 2007-2032, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37256322

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The literature is scarce regarding the effects of comorbidities, clinical parameters, and lifestyle as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study was performed to systematically review the literature related to body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia, chronic constipation, smoking, chronic cough, occupation, and striae and varicose veins as determinants for POP. METHODS: Search terms in accordance with Medical Subject Headings were used in PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library. Clinical comparative studies between women with and without POP and containing demographic and/or clinical raw data related to lifestyle and/or comorbidities were included. The ROBINS-I (risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions) instrument was used. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used for homogeneous and heterogeneous studies, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. BMI < 25 kg/m2 was found to be a protective factor for POP [OR 0.71 (0.51, 0.99); p = 0.04], and BMI > 30 kg/m2 was a risk factor for POP [OR 1.44 (1.37, 1.52); p < 0.00001]. Waist circumference (≥ 88 cm) was reported as a risk factor for POP [OR 1.80 (1.37, 2.38); p < 0.00001], along with HT [OR 1.18 (1.09, 1.27); p = 0.04], constipation [OR 1.77 (1.23, 2.54); p < 0.00001], occupation [OR 1.86 (1.21, 2.86); p < 0.00001], persistent cough [OR 1.52 (1.18, 1.94); p < 0.0001]), and varicose veins [OR 2.01 (1.50, 2.70); p = 0.12]. CONCLUSIONS: BMI < 25 kg/m2 is protective while BMI > 30 kg/m2 is a risk factor for POP. Large waist circumference, dyslipidemia, HT, constipation, occupation, persistent cough, and varicose veins are also determinants for POP.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Várices , Femenino , Humanos , Tos , Factores de Riesgo , Estilo de Vida , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/etiología
3.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 28(7): 452-460, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536679

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration uses the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database to evaluate the safety of urogynecologic meshes; however, reports on individual meshes have not been characterized. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare complications among available urogynecologic meshes reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of medical device reports (MDRs) of urogynecologic mesh from January 2004 to March 2019, using the Reed Tech Navigator (LexisNexis), which codes MDRs. The percentage of reports containing specific complaints (not an adverse event rate) were compared with χ 2 tests with Dunn-Sidak correction. Correlations with time on market, mesh weight, stiffness, and porosity were determined. RESULTS: The 34,485 reports examined included 6 transvaginal meshes, 4 sacrocolpopexy meshes, and 10 midurethral slings. Most reported events were pain, erosion, and infection. For transvaginal prolapse, less than 10% of Uphold Lite (Boston Scientific) reports contained pain or erosion versus greater than 90% of Prolift/Prolift+M (Ethicon, P < 0.001). For sacrocolpopexy mesh, greater than 90% of Gynemesh (Ethicon; Prolift in vaginal form) reports included erosion and pain versus less than 60% for Artisyn (Ethicon), Restorelle (Colpoplast), and Upsylon (Boston Scientific, P < 0.0001). For slings, Gynecare TVT Obturator had the highest proportion of erosion and pain complaints. Heavier sling meshes had more reports. When Ascend (Caldera Medical), an outlier with only 5 reports, was excluded, transvaginal mesh stiffness correlated strongly with number of reports. For transvaginal meshes, number of reports correlated with time on market (ρ = 0.8, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Individual meshes have different properties with different complication profiles, which should inform mesh development and use. Gynemesh MDRs included pain and erosion more frequently than others. Comprehensive registries are needed.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Cabestrillo Suburetral , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Cabestrillo Suburetral/efectos adversos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(6): 2220-2224, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35257635

RESUMEN

POP affected 40% of participants in the WHI trial. Risk factors include parity, vaginal delivery, large babies, advancing age, obesity, hysterectomy and lifting. Data suggest African-American women have a lower prevalence of symptomatic POP than other racial groups. Literature review did not show a study of risk factors and symptoms in a black population. Cross-sectional study of women with POP attending urogynaecology clinic at the UHWI from May to October 2013, using an interviewer administered questionnaire was performed and analysed using SPSS version 19 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). One hundred and eight participants were included: 94.7% postmenopausal (mean 65.08 years) and 94.5% parous (mean 4). Risk factors included obesity (mean BMI 28.82 kg/m2), hysterectomy (28.7%), heavy lifting (51.9%) and chronic cough (13.9%). Symptoms included stress incontinence (40.7%), stranguria (16.7%), faecal incontinence (13.9%), constipation (31.5%), coital urinary and faecal incontinence (6.3%, 12.6%). We concluded risk factors for POP in this population correlates with other studies. Stress urinary incontinence and constipation most frequently reported symptoms in this population.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition with multifactorial aetiology. As seen in systematic reviews (Vergeldt TFM, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. 2015. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. International Urogynecology Journal 26(11):1559-1573). Study shows white women appeared to have more overall symptoms both from prolapse, as well as urinary symptoms, as compared with black women (Ford AT, Eto CU, Smith M, Northington GM. 2019. Racial differences in pelvic organ prolapse symptoms among women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 25:130-133).What do the results of this study add? The result highlights the fact that Black women are exposed to similar risk factors and have similar symptoms to other racial groups for POP.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings can be used to educate women with risk factors about the possibility of developing symptomatic POP. Further research is needed to ascertain the prevalence of POP and to assess knowledge and attitude in this population as we hypothesise that there is generalised assumption in that being black is protective from POP.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estreñimiento , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales , Obesidad , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/etiología
5.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(1): 15-29, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351465

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Age is named as a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), despite not being the primary outcome for many observational studies. Postmenopausal status is another associated factor but has many confounders. We aimed to systematically review the role of age and/or postmenopausal status in POP development. METHODS: Systematic review addressing age and hormones, more specifically by postmenopausal status, from inception to March 2020 in four databases (PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library). Quality of evidence was classified by the ROBINS-I classification for non-randomized studies. Experimental studies, animal studies, studies linking age with recurrent POP and case series were excluded. Effect estimates were collected from adjusted odds ratio plus 95% confidence intervals. Significance level was 5%. A discussion exploring mechanistic factors was also included. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (11 cross sectional, 6 cohort and 2 case control) were included for quantitative analysis. Only two studies presented a low overall risk of bias for age; most of the domains were of moderate risk. Every additional year was responsible for a 10% increase in the risk to develop POP (OR = 1.102 [1.021-1.190]; i2 = 80%, random analysis, p = 0.012). This trend was confirmed when age was dichotomized into a cutoff of 35 (p = 0.035) and 50 (p < 0.001) years. Although an increase in the risk for POP was noted in postmenopausal women, this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 2.080 [0.927-4.668], i2 = 0%, p = 0.076). CONCLUSION: Age is a risk factor for POP; postmenopausal status was not statistically associated with POP, prompting the need for further studies addressing this factor.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Posmenopausia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/complicaciones , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(4): 955-960, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32852573

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to evaluate levator ani muscle avulsion (LAMA) and ballooning as risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP). We hypothesize that these ultrasound findings are associated with a higher risk of POP recurrence. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic SCP between January 2015 and December 2018. Baseline translabial 3D ultrasound of the pelvic floor was performed. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) were applied. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients were included. On ultrasound, 32% of patients had levator ani muscle avulsion, and 36.5% had ballooning. Mean follow-up time was 16 months. There was a 13.4% anatomic recurrence; five of them (3.7%) also had symptomatic recurrence. After multivariate analysis we found that LAMA and ballooning were not significant: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.098-10.1; p = 0.99) and OR 1.1 (95% CI 0.99-1.2; p = 0.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LAMA and ballooning on pelvic floor US are not significant risk factors for anatomic POP recurrence after laparoscopic SCP. Laparoscopic SCP has a 13.4% and 3.4% anatomic and symptomatic recurrence rate, respectively, and the majority of patients reported significant improvement in quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Menopause ; 27(4): 450-458, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32168199

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-reported main pelvic floor disorders (PFD) (urinary incontinence [UI], pelvic organ prolapse [POP], and fecal incontinence [FI]) and its associated factors in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and a control group. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study wherein two groups were interviewed from August, 2017 to November, 2018-women with POI (n = 150) and a control group matched for age and body weight (n = 150). Sociodemographic variables and two questionnaires validated in Brazilian Portuguese language for PFD (Kings Health Questionnaire [KHQ] and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 [PFDI-20]) were used. Laycock's power, endurance, repetitions, fast contractions, every contraction timed (PERFECT) scale for pelvic floor muscle assessment was used in both groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported UI was 27.33% and 37.33% for POI and control groups (P > 0.05), respectively. There was no perceived difference regarding the prevalence of POP (9.33% POI group vs 8% control group; P = 0.682) and FI (8% POI vs 4% control group; P = 0.145). The P (power) (P = 0.46), E (endurance) (P = 0.91), R (repetitions) (P = 0.88), and F (fast contractions) (P = 0.19) values were statistically similar in both the groups. Multivariate analysis (n = 141) showed that higher weight (odds ratio [OR] 1.047 [1.018-1.076]; P < 0.001) and gravidity rates (OR 1.627 [1.169-2.266]; P < 0.01) were risk factors for UI and higher weight (OR 1.046 [1.010-1.084]; P = 0.01), and presence of comorbidities (OR 8.75 [1.07-71.44]; P < 0.01) were risk factors for POP in the POI group; there was no variable that was associated with FI. CONCLUSIONS: Women with POI did not have significant differences when compared with the control group regarding the prevalence of PFD and pelvic floor muscle assessment. Having higher weight and gravidity rates were associated with self-reported UI, while the presence of comorbidities and higher weight were risk factors for POP in the POI group. : Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A555.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/complicaciones , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prevalencia , Autoinforme , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
8.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 46(1): 5-14, Jan.-Feb. 2020. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056367

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT The exact prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse is difficult to establish. The anatomical changes do not always consist with the severity or the symptoms associated with prolapse. There are many risk factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse and this review aims to identify the epidemiology and pathophysiology while looking at the known risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse. PubMed search involved a number of terms including: epidemiology, risk factors, reoccurrence indicators, management and evaluation. Several risk factors have been associated with pelvic organ prolapse, all contribute to weakening of the pelvic floor connective tissue/collagen, allowing the pelvic organs to prolapse through the vaginal walls. Among the risk factors are genetic background, childbirth and mode of delivery, previous hysterectomy, menopausal state and the ratio between Estrogen receptors. The "Integral theory" of Petros and the "Levels of Support" model of Delancey enable us to locate the defect, diagnose and treat pelvic organ prolapse. The currently available demographic data is not reliable enough to properly estimate the true extent of pelvic organ prolapse in the population. However, standardization of the diagnosis and treatment may significantly improve our ability to estimate the true incidence and prevalence of this condition in the coming years.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/fisiopatología , Paridad , Menopausia/fisiología , Factores de Riesgo , Colágeno/fisiología , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/terapia , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/fisiopatología
9.
Int Braz J Urol ; 46(1): 5-14, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851453

RESUMEN

The exact prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse is difficult to establish. The anatomical changes do not always consist with the severity or the symptoms associated with prolapse. There are many risk factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse and this review aims to identify the epidemiology and pathophysiology while looking at the known risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse. PubMed search involved a number of terms including: epidemiology, risk factors, reoccurrence indicators, management and evaluation. Several risk factors have been associated with pelvic organ prolapse, all contribute to weakening of the pelvic floor connective tissue/collagen, allowing the pelvic organs to prolapse through the vaginal walls. Among the risk factors are genetic background, childbirth and mode of delivery, previous hysterectomy, menopausal state and the ratio between Estrogen receptors. The "Integral theory" of Petros and the "Levels of Support" model of Delancey enable us to locate the defect, diagnose and treat pelvic organ prolapse. The currently available demographic data is not reliable enough to properly estimate the true extent of pelvic organ prolapse in the population. However, standardization of the diagnosis and treatment may significantly improve our ability to estimate the true incidence and prevalence of this condition in the coming years.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/fisiopatología , Colágeno/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia/fisiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Paridad , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/terapia , Factores de Riesgo
10.
BMC Womens Health ; 19(1): 94, 2019 07 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reproductive history and urogynecological disorders have been associated with limitations in physical function. However, little is known about the relationship between symptoms of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, and physical performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine whether symptoms of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are independently associated factors with indicators of lower physical performance in middle-aged women from Northeast Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 381 women between 40 to 65 years old living in Parnamirim, Northeast Brazil. Physical performance was assessed by gait speed, chair stand and standing balance tests. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse were self-reported. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to model the effect of self-reported urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse on each physical performance measure, adjusted for covariates (age, family income, education, body mass index, parity). RESULTS: In the analysis adjusted for confounders, women reporting urinary incontinence spent, on average, half a second longer to perform the chair stand test (ß = 0.505 95% CI: 0.034: 0.976). Those reporting pelvic organ prolapse shortened the balance time with eyes open by 2.5 s on average (ß = - 2.556; CI: - 4.769: - 0.343). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence are associated to worse physical performance in middle-aged women. These seemingly small changes in physical performance levels are of clinical importance, since these conditions may influence women's physical ability, with implications for other tasks important to daily functioning and should be addressed by health policies targeting women's health and functionality.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/fisiopatología , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Incontinencia Urinaria/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paridad , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Embarazo , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
12.
In. Castillo Pino, Edgardo A. Tratado de perineología: disfunciones del piso pélvico. Montevideo, Academia Nacional de Medicina, 2019. p.201-210.
Monografía en Español | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1348308
13.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 298(2): 345-352, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948172

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Disorders related to pelvic floor include urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction and pelvic pain. Because pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD) can be diagnosed clinically, imaging techniques serve as auxiliary tools for establishing an accurate diagnosis. The objective is to evaluate the PFD in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and the association between clinical examination and three-dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a in tertiary maternity. All primiparous women with vaginal deliveries that occurred between January 2013 and December 2015 were invited. Women who attended the invitation underwent detailed anamnesis, questionnaire application, physical examination and endovaginal and endoanal 3DUS. Crude and adjusted predictor factors for PFD were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty women were evaluated. Sexual dysfunction was the most prevalent PFD (64.6%). When associated with clinical features and PFD, oxytocin use increased by approximately four times the odds of UI (crude OR 4.182, 95% CI 1.149-15.219). During the multivariate analysis, the odds of UI were increased in forceps use by approximately 11 times (adjusted OR 11.552, 95% CI 11.155-115.577). When the clinical and obstetrical predictors for PFD were associated with 3DUS, forceps increased the odds of lesion of the pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter diagnosed by 3DUS by sixfold (crude OR 6.000, 95% CI 1.172-30.725), and in multivariate analysis forceps again increased the odds of injury by approximately 7 times (adjusted OR 7.778, 95% CI 1.380-43.846). CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction was the most frequent PFD. The use of forceps in primiparous women was associated with a greater chance of UI and pelvic floor muscle damage diagnosed by 3DUS.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Canal Anal/lesiones , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Paridad , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
14.
Int Urogynecol J ; 29(6): 893-898, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29532123

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We verified the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs2236479 of the collagen 18 (COL18A1) and rs2862296 of the lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL-4) genes and the association with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Brazilian women and determined risk factors for POP development. METHODS: We assessed 532 postmenopausal women divided into POP (stages III and IV) and control (stages 0 and I) groups by examination and peripheral blood sample collection. DNA sequences of interest were analyzed by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We used logistic regression models for the analyses, with p < 0.005 for significance. RESULTS: The frequency of homozygous polymorphic alleles (AA) in COL18A1 and (GG) in LOXL-4 were similar in both groups (17.5% and 15.4% for COL18A1 and 18.9% and 20.6% for LOXL-4, respectively). There were no associations between those polymorphisms or other genotypes and POP. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.10, confidence interval (CI) 95% = 1.07; 1.14), number of vaginal births (OR = 1.66, CI 95% = 1.36; 2.03), and family history (OR = 2.55 CI 95% = 1.43; 4.55) as independent risk factors for POP. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests lack of association between DNA polymorphisms rs2236479 of COL18A1 and rs2862296 of LOXL-4 with advanced POP in this population.


Asunto(s)
Aminoácido Oxidorreductasas/genética , Colágeno Tipo XVIII/genética , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Posmenopausia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/genética , Proteína-Lisina 6-Oxidasa , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
Int Urogynecol J ; 28(8): 1165-1170, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28035442

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition among Brazilians, population-based epidemiological studies of POP are scarce. We studied POP in a population of women undergoing routine examination to determine its prevalence, distribution and relationship to risk factors. METHODS: This quantitative descriptive study surveyed 432 women, based on prolapse prevalence, who sought routine care and were assessed for prolapse staging using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Demographics, health history, socioeconomic data, symptoms and risk factors for prolapse were self-reported by the participants. RESULTS: A total of 226 (52.3%) of the examined women had POP. The prevalences of POP in relation to stage were as follows: stage 1 (27.8%), stage 2 (23.1%), and stage 3 (1.4%). Regarding risk factors, a history of vaginal delivery (odds ratio, OR, 6.678, 95% confidence interval, CI, 4.16-10.73), delivery of a newborn heavier than 4 kg (OR 2.056, 95% CI 1.19-3.56) and menopausal status (OR 2.793, 95% CI 1.66-4.70) were all associated with a higher risk of prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a majority of the population sample exhibited some degree of prolapse, suggesting that POP deserves substantial clinical attention. The risk factors identified suggest that eventual prolapse may be unavoidable in some women. Public policies should be implemented with respect to modifiable risk factors and antenatal care.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Genet Mol Res ; 14(2): 2994-3001, 2015 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25966063

RESUMEN

This study investigated the incidences of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse as well as pelvic floor muscle strength after cesarean section and vaginal delivery. From June 2010 to July 2011, 149 puerpera in Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, were divided into the cesarean section group (N = 66) and the vaginal delivery group (N = 83). Postpartum urinary incontinence analysis, pelvic examination, and pelvic muscle contraction analysis using the PHENIX neuromuscular therapy instrument were performed to compare urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and pelvic floor muscle condition between the 2 groups. The incidences of urinary incontinence in the cesarean and vaginal delivery groups were 9.09% (6/66) and 16.87% (14/83), respectively (P > 0.05); the incidences of pelvic organ prolapse were 53.03% (35/66) and 86.75% (72/83), respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pelvic muscle pressure or electrophysiological examination results between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Hence, cesarean section has a protective effect on early postpartum pelvic organ prolapse, but the delivery modes do not differ significantly with respect to the incidence of postpartum urinary incontinence or pelvic muscle floor muscle strength.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Adulto , Beijing/epidemiología , Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
17.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol ; 78(5): 338-343, oct. 2013. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-698657

RESUMEN

Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados subjetivos, anatómicos y funcionales a largo plazo de las pacientes sometidas a sacrocolpopexia laparoscópica para manejo de prolapso apical. Métodos: Estudio observacional con pacientes a quienes se les hizo sacrocolpopexia laparoscópica entre febrero de 2006 y diciembre de 2012, en tres centros. El nivel de soporte del piso pélvico se midió mediante la escala de cuantificación del prolapso de órganos pélvicos (POP-Q). Los resultados funcionales se evaluaron mediante un cuestionario de síntomas intestinales, urinarios, sexuales y de molestias físicas. También se estimó la satisfacción global de las pacientes con una escala de uno a diez. Resultados: Se realizó sacrocolpopexia laparoscópica a 68 pacientes, pero el seguimiento fue posible sólo en 24. Ninguna paciente tuvo prolapso apical postoperatorio. El punto C medio del POP-Q fue -6,8 cm. Se observó mejoría importante con respecto a los síntomas subjetivos de prolapso con reducciones significativas en las puntuaciones del cuestionario en el seguimiento postoperatorio. La satisfacción fue en promedio de 9,1. La incontinencia urinaria preoperatoria se resolvió en el 35 por ciento de las que la reportaron, sin necesidad de cirugía de continencia concomitante. No hubo complicaciones a corto plazo. A largo plazo hubo una hernia incisional en el sitio del trocar y una obstrucción intestinal por la malla. Conclusión: La sacrocolpopexia laparoscópica es un tratamiento quirúrgico seguro y eficaz para el prolapso apical post-histerectomía. Proporciona un excelente soporte apical y buen nivel de satisfacción, con una mejoría general de los síntomas de prolapso.


Objective: To evaluate the long-term subjective, anatomical and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse. Methods: An observational study of women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between February 2006 and December 2012 was undertaken, at three centers. Pelvic organ support was assessed objectively using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification scale (POP-Q). Functional outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire of bowel, urinary, sexual and physical discomfort symptoms postoperatively. Also was assessed the overall satisfaction of surgery with a scale of one to ten. Results: During the period of the study, sacrocolpopexy was done in 68 patients, but follow-up was possible only in 24. At a mean follow up of 34 months, all 24 women had stage 0 vault support with point C of the POP-Q score averaging -6.8 cm. Subjective improvements in prolapse symptoms were observed with significant reductions in the questionnaire scores. The satisfaction measured with visual scale averaged 9.1. Fifteen women reported stress urinary incontinence before sacrocolpopexy, and it was resolved in 35 percent without concomitant continence surgery. New onset incontinence was reported in two women. There were no intraoperative and perioperative complications. The long term complications were an incisional hernia on the trocar port site and bowel obstruction caused by the mesh that needed intestinal resection. Conclusions: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe and effective surgical treatment for post-hysterectomy apical prolapse. It provides excellent apical support and good level of satisfaction, with overall improvement in prolapse symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios de Seguimiento , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Región Sacrococcígea , Satisfacción del Paciente
18.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 75(2): 85-92, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23295833

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare biomechanical properties of vaginal tissues between women with and without pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and investigate factors that may influence these properties. METHODS: Forty patients submitted to POP surgery and 15 non-POP cadavers were evaluated. The tissue was excised from anterior and posterior middle third vagina. The biomechanical properties considered were stiffness (E) and maximum stress (S), and they were evaluated by means of uniaxial tension tests. RESULTS: POP patients were associated with higher values of E (13.1 ± 0.8 vs. 9.5 ± 0.7 MPa; p < 0.001) and S (5.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.9 MPa; p < 0.001) in the anterior vaginal wall compared to the posterior wall. In contrast, non-POP women presented lower values of E (6.9 ± 1.1 vs. 10.5 ± 1.0 MPa; p = 0.01) and S (2.6 ± 0.4 vs. 3.5 ± 0.4 MPa; p = 0.043) in the anterior wall. The occurrence of POP was the only independent predictor of higher values of E and S in anterior vaginal samples (p = 0.003 and p = 0.008, respectively). Women with severe anterior vaginal prolapse presented higher levels of E and S in the anterior sample compared to those with lower POP stages (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01; respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with POP present significant changes of biomechanical properties in the vagina.


Asunto(s)
Elasticidad/fisiología , Estrés Mecánico , Prolapso Uterino/fisiopatología , Vagina/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paridad , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Prolapso Uterino/etiología , Adulto Joven
19.
Medwave ; 12(3)mar.-abr. 2012. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-714155

RESUMEN

Las disfunciones del piso pélvico comprenden la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo, el prolapso de órganos pélvicos y la incontinencia anal. Una de cada diez mujeres tendrá que ser sometida a una intervención quirúrgica por disfunciones del piso pélvico durante su vida. Además, entre el 30 por ciento y el 50 por ciento tendrá una recidiva de estas intervenciones. La maternidad es un factor que contribuye de manera importante en la presentación de estas disfunciones pelvianas. Aún no existe evidencia probada de que el parto vaginal sea un factor completamente decisivo para la presencia de disfunciones del piso pélvico. Existe intensa investigación acerca del embarazo y el parto y sus efectos sobre el piso pélvico, y acerca de si algunas de las acciones obstétricas pueden ser modificadas con el fin de protegerlo de los potenciales daños.


The pelvic floor dysfunctions include urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapsed and anal incontinence. One in ten women will be subjected to surgery for pelvic floor dysfunction during their lifetime. In addition, between 30 percent and 50 percent will have a recurrence of these interventions. Motherhood is a factor that contributes significantly to the submission of pelvic dysfunctions. There is still no proven evidence that vaginal delivery is an absolutely crucial factor for the presence of pelvic floor dysfunction. There is extensive research on pregnancy and child birth and their effects on the pelvic floor and if some of the obstetric action scan be modified in order to protect it from potential damage.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Fisura Anal/etiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Diafragma Pélvico , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Femina ; 40(2)mar.-abr. 2012. ilus
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-652209

RESUMEN

O prolapso genital é condição comum. Ocorre por fraqueza ou defeitos nos órgãos pélvicos de suspensão, que são constituídos de ligamentos, e/ou aqueles de sustentação, constituídos por fáscias e músculos. Sua avaliação constitui uma etapa importante do exame ginecológico, devendo, sempre que possível, ser classificado o grau de prolapso por meio de métodos padronizados. Atualmente, a quantificação é realizada por meio do POP-Q, preconizada pela Sociedade Internacional de Continência (ICS). Embora não seja uma afecção fatal, pode determinar sequelas importantes para a saúde da mulher, comprometendo sua qualidade de vida. Seu diagnóstico precoce previne o estágio final da doença. O tratamento pode ser conservador ou cirúrgico, dependendo do grau do prolapso, idade e estado clínico da paciente.


The pelvic prolapse is a common condition. It's occurs because of weakness or defects in the suspension pelvic organs - consisting of ligaments, and/or those of support, which consist of fascias and muscles. It's assessment is an important phase of the gynecological exam and, whenever possible, the degree of prolapse should be identified by means of standard methods. Currently the measurement is performed using POP-Q, as recommended by the International Continence Society (ICS). Although the disease is not considered fatal, it can determine serious sequela for women's health, affecting their quality of life. It's early diagnosis prevents the final stage of the disease. Treatment can be conservative or surgical depending on the degree of prolapse, and the patient age and medical condition.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/clasificación , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/diagnóstico , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso Uterino , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Obstétrico y Ginecológico , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Paridad , Pesarios , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA