RESUMEN

Introducción: El prolapso de órganos pélvicos (POP) o distopia genital, es el descenso o desplazamiento de los órganos del suelo pélvico a través del canal vaginal o fuera de este. Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados de la histeropexia vaginal en la corrección quirúrgica del prolapso genital apical grado III o IV, usando prótesis de polipropileno; además describir la tasa de éxito, recurrencias y complicaciones. Método: Estudio de cohorte, en 42 mujeres sometidas a histeropexia vaginal (histero-cistopexia ortotópica) mediante prótesis de polipropileno (Splentis®), entre 2016 y 2021. Se realizaron tres evaluaciones postoperatorias (tres, seis y 12 meses). Se hizo muestreo no probabilístico. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva. Resultados: La edad media fue de 56,19 ± 9,27 años. El tiempo quirúrgico de 58,95 ± 13,74 minutos, el sangrado quirúrgico de 119,85 ± 68,73 ml. La tasa de éxito a los 12 meses fue del 90,47%. La recurrencia del prolapso apical fue del 4,76% a los seis meses y del 9,52% a los 12 meses; el de compartimento anterior a los seis meses arrojó un 7,14%, frente al 11,9% a los 12 meses. El 14,28% de las pacientes presentaron complicaciones menores. La incidencia de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo a los 12 meses fue del 16,66%. Conclusiones: la histeropexia vaginal es un procedimiento efectivo y seguro, con bajas tasas de recurrencias o complicaciones. Es importante que se sigan haciendo estudios con mejores diseños estadísticos.

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), or genital dystopia, is the descent or displacement of pelvic floor organs through the vaginal canal or outside of it. Objective: To evaluate the results of vaginal hysteropexy in the surgical correction of grade III or IV apical genital prolapse, using polypropylene prosthesis; also describe the success rate, recurrences and complications. Method: Cohort study in 42 women undergoing vaginal hysteropexy (orthotopic hystero-cystopexy) using a polypropylene prosthesis (Splentis®); between 2016 and 2021. Three postoperative evaluations were carried out (three, six and twelve months). Non-probabilistic sampling was done. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: The mean age was 56.19 ± 9.27 years. Surgical time of 58.95 ± 13.74 minutes, surgical bleeding of 119.85 ± 68.73 ml. The success rate after twelve months was 90.47%. Apical prolapse recurrence was 4.76% at six months and 9.52% at twelve months; that of the previous compartment, after six months it showed 7.14%, compared to 11.9% after twelve months; 14.28% of the patients presented minor complications. The incidence of stress urinary incontinence, at twelve months, was 16.66%. Conclusions: Vaginal hysteropexy is an effective and safe procedure, with low rates of recurrence or complications. It is important that studies continue to be carried out with better statistical designs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: Laparoscopic techniques to treat pelvic organ prolapse are gaining popularity around the globe due to their low recurrence rates and better functional results compared to perineal techniques. However, the optimum surgical procedures are not yet determined. In the current research, we suggest a novel surgical approach, laparoscopic vaginal suspension with suture rectopexy, to treat multiorgan pelvic prolapse. Methods: This prospective cohort trial was conducted from March 2018 to March 2022 and comprised 35 females with multiorgan pelvic organ prolapse with obstructed defecation symptoms. A residual rectal prolapse was still present despite the manual reduction of uterine prolapse. Patients' conditions before and after the operation were monitored regarding the obstructed defecation score, sexual function, need for laxatives, anorectal manometry pressures, anorectal sensations, and recurrence. The mean follow-up duration was one year. Results: Modified Longo score for obstructed defecation significantly decreased at six and twelve months after surgery. Additionally, a significant reduction was reported in the number of patients who needed laxatives at six and twelve months after surgery. Anorectal manometry pre- and post-surgery showed a significant elevation in the mean squeeze pressure and a decline in all rectal sensations. All parameters of the female sexual function scoring system increased postoperatively. No recurrence was reported during follow-up. Conclusion: For multiorgan pelvic prolapse, laparoscopic vaginal suspension combined with suture rectopexy has excellent functional outcomes, minimal morbidity, and low cost. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of the surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in stages III and IV by sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) by comparing anatomical and subjective cure rates and quality-of-life parameters (through the version validated for the Portuguese language of the Prolapse Quality of Life [P-QoL] questionnaire) under two definitions: genital prolapse Ba, Bp, and C < -1 (stage I) and Ba, Bp, and C ≤ 0 (stage II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After we obtained approval from the Ethics Committee (under CAAE 0833/06) and registered the study in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01347021), 51 patients were randomized into two groups: the USLS group (N = 26) and the SSLF group (N = 25), with follow-up 6 and 12 months after the procedures. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the P-QoL score and anatomical measurements of all compartments in both groups after 12 months (p < 0.001). The anatomical cure rates in the USLS and SSLF groups, considering stage 1, were of 34.6% and 40% (anterior) respectively; of 100% both for groups (apical); and of 73.1% and 92% (posterior) respectively. The rates of adverse outcomes were of 42% (N = 11) and 36% (N = 11) for the USLS and SSLF groups respectively (p = 0.654), and those outcomes were excessive bleeding, bladder perforation (intraoperative) or gluteal pain, and urinary infection (postoperative), among others, without differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: High cure rates in all compartments were observed according to the anatomical criterion (stage I), without differences in P-QoL scores and complications either with USLS or SSLF for the surgical treatment of accentuated POP.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia e os resultados do tratamento cirúrgico para prolapso de órgãos pélvicos (POP) nos estágios III e IV, por meio da técnica de fixação do ligamento sacroespinal (FLSE) ou suspensão do ligamento útero-sacro (SLUS), ao comparar os índices de cura anatômicos, subjetivos, e os parâmetros de qualidade de vida (por meio do questionário Prolapse Quality of Life [P-QoL] validado para a língua portuguesa) sob duas definições: prolapso genital Ba, Bp e C < −1 (estágio I) e Ba, Bp e C ≤ 0 (estágio II). MATERIAIS E MéTODOS: Após aprovação do Comitê de Ética (CAAE 0833/06) e registro no ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01347021), 51 pacientes foram randomizadas em dois grupos: grupo SLUS (N = 26) e (2) grupo FLSE (N = 25), com seguimento de 6 e 12 meses. RESULTADOS: Houve melhora significativa nas pontuações no P-QoL e nas medidas anatômicas de todos os compartimentos em ambos os grupos após 12 meses (p < 0,001). As taxas de cura anatômica nos grupos SLUS e FLSE , considerando o estágio 1, foram de 34,6% e 40% (anterior), respectivamente; de 100% em ambos os grupos (apical); e de 73,1% e 92% (posterior), respectivamente. As taxas de resultados adversos foram de 42% (N = 11) e 36% (N = 11), respectivamente, nos grupos SLUS e FLSE (p = 0,654), e elas foram sangramento excessivo, perfuração da bexiga (intraoperatória) ou dor glútea, e infecção urinária (pós-operatória), entre outras, sem diferenças entre os grupos. CONCLUSãO: Altas taxas de cura em todos os compartimentos foram observadas segundo critério anatômico (estágio I), sem diferença quanto às pontuações no P-QoL e às complicações tanto com SLUS quanto com FLSE para o tratamento cirúrgico de POP acentuado.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Acute postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after pelvic reconstructive surgery, occurring in 15-45% of women. There is a paucity of data on the relationship between frailty and POUR after prolapse surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between frailty and POUR in older women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This secondary analysis of a prospective study of postoperative delirium enrolled women 60 years and older undergoing prolapse surgery. The Fried Frailty Index was used to assess frailty before surgery. Acute POUR was defined as failure to pass a retrograde voiding trial at hospital discharge with postvoid residual volume of greater than 100 mL. RESULTS: Analyses included 165 women, with a mean ± SD age of 72.5 ± 6.1 years and a body mass index of 28.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2. There were 49 laparoscopic/robotic apical suspension procedures (29.7%), 60 vaginal obliterative procedures (36.4%), 47 vaginal apical suspension procedures (28.5%), and 9 isolated anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphies (5.5%), of which 9 had a concomitant incontinence procedure. Seventy-eight women (47.3%) experienced acute POUR. Thirty-one (18.8%) met the criteria for "not frail," 115 (88.5%) were "prefrail," and 19 (11.5%) were "frail." Neither frailty status nor score was associated with POUR. In an analysis of individual Fried Frailty Index components, self-reported unintentional weight loss was significantly associated with POUR (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-17.15). This remained significant on multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-16.39). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty was not associated with POUR in older women undergoing prolapse surgery. The observed association between POUR and unintended weight loss before surgery warrants further investigation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The high prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women requires attention and constant review of treatment options. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for apical prolapse has benefits, high efficacy, and low cost. Our objective is to compare anterior and posterior vaginal approach in SSLF in relation to anatomical structures and to correlate them with body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Sacrospinous ligament fixation was performed in fresh female cadavers via anterior and posterior vaginal approaches, using the CAPIO®SLIM device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The distances from the point of fixation to the pudendal artery, pudendal nerve, and inferior gluteal artery were measured. RESULTS: We evaluated 11 cadavers with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.9 years and mean BMI 22.4 ± 4.6 kg/m2. The mean distance from the posterior SSLF to the ischial spine, pudendal artery, pudendal nerve, and inferior gluteal artery were 21.18 ± 2.22 mm, 17.9 ± 7.3 mm, 19.2 ± 6.8 mm, and 18.9 ± 6.9 mm respectively. The same measurements relative to the anterior SSLF were 19.7 ± 2.7 mm, 18.6 ± 6.7 mm, 19.2 ± 6.9 mm, and 18.3 ± 6.7 mm. Statistical analysis showed no difference between the distances in the two approaches. The distances from the fixation point to the pudendal artery and nerve were directly proportional to the BMI. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the measurements obtained in the anterior and posterior vaginal approaches. A direct correlation between BMI and the distances to the pudendal artery and pudendal nerve was found.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a defect of the female pelvic floor. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and obstructive symptoms may occur in these patients. The objective of surgical treatment is to restore the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor; however, it may prompt urinary symptoms not present previously. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine urodynamic changes in patients undergoing surgical correction for POP. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that contained data from urodynamic evaluation before and after vaginal surgery for POP. The main urodynamic data collected were free uroflowmetry (maximum flow [Qmax], voided volume, and post-void residual volume [PVR]), cystometry (bladder capacity, presence of detrusor overactivity [DO], SUI or UUI, and Valsalva leak point pressure), and pressure × flow study (detrusor pressure at maximum flow [PdetQmax], Qmax, and PVR). RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included (1,549 women). Patients had a significantly higher prevalence of DO before surgery (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.06-2.29), and surgeries without sling placement demonstrated a tendency to ameliorate DO. Patients who did not receive a sling were more incontinent after surgery. Bladder-emptying parameters improved after surgery, with higher PdetQmax before surgery (IV = 3.23; 95% CI = 0.45-1.18). Patients who did not receive MUS presented a lower Qmax (IV = -3.19; 95%CI = -4.09 to -2.30) and a higher PVR (IV = 27.89; 95%CI = 15.68-40.1) before surgery. CONCLUSION: Correction surgery for POP yields better urodynamic emptying parameters, with a reduction in the prevalence of DO. In contrast, sling placement enhances obstructive parameters.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of the surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in stages III and IV by sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) by comparing anatomical and subjective cure rates and quality-of-life parameters (through the version validated for the Portuguese language of the Prolapse Quality of Life [P-QoL] questionnaire) under two definitions: genital prolapse Ba, Bp, and C< −1 (stage I) and Ba, Bp, and C ≤ 0 (stage II). Materials and Methods After we obtained approval from the Ethics Committee (under CAAE 0833/06) and registered the study in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 01347021), 51 patients were randomized into two groups: the USLS group (N = 26) and the SSLF group (N = 25), with follow-up 6 and 12 months after the procedures. Results There was a significant improvement in the P-QoL score and anatomical measurements of all compartments in both groups after 12 months (p< 0.001). The anatomical cure rates in the USLS and SSLF groups, considering stage 1, were of 34.6% and 40% (anterior) respectively; of 100% both for groups (apical); and of 73.1% and 92% (posterior) respectively. The rates of adverse outcomes were of 42% (N = 11) and 36% (N = 11) for the USLS and SSLF groups respectively (p= 0.654), and those outcomes were excessive bleeding, bladder perforation (intraoperative) or gluteal pain, and urinary infection (postoperative), among others, without differences between the groups. Conclusion High cure rates in all compartments were observed according to the anatomical criterion (stage I), without differences in P-QoL scores and complications either with USLS or SSLF for the surgical treatment of accentuated POP.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a eficácia e os resultados do tratamento cirúrgico para prolapso de órgãos pélvicos (POP) nos estágios III e IV, por meio da técnica de fixação do ligamento sacroespinal (FLSE) ou suspensão do ligamento útero-sacro (SLUS), ao comparar os índices de cura anatômicos, subjetivos, e os parâmetros de qualidade de vida (por meio do questionário Prolapse Quality of Life [P-QoL] validado para a língua portuguesa) sob duas definições: prolapso genital Ba, Bp e C< −1 (estágio I) e Ba, Bp e C ≤ 0 (estágio II). Materiais e Métodos Após aprovação do Comitê de Ética (CAAE 0833/06) e registro no ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 01347021), 51 pacientes foram randomizadas em dois grupos: grupo SLUS (N = 26) e (2) grupo FLSE (N = 25), com seguimento de 6 e 12 meses. Resultados Houve melhora significativa nas pontuações no P-QoL e nas medidas anatômicas de todos os compartimentos em ambos os grupos após 12 meses (p< 0,001). As taxas de cura anatômica nos grupos SLUS e FLSE , considerando o estágio 1, foram de 34,6% e 40% (anterior), respectivamente; de 100% em ambos os grupos (apical); e de 73,1% e 92% (posterior), respectivamente. As taxas de resultados adversos foram de 42% (N = 11) e 36% (N = 11), respectivamente, nos grupos SLUS e FLSE (p= 0,654), e elas foram sangramento excessivo, perfuração da bexiga (intraoperatória) ou dor glútea, e infecção urinária (pós-operatória), entre outras, sem diferenças entre os grupos. Conclusão Altas taxas de cura em todos os compartimentos foram observadas segundo critério anatômico (estágio I), sem diferença quanto às pontuações no P-QoL e às complicações tanto com SLUS quanto com FLSE para o tratamento cirúrgico de POP acentuado.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción: El prolapso de órganos pélvico (POP) es una patología frecuente que afecta hasta el 60% de las mujeres. La fijación alta al ligamento uterosacro (FAUS) transvaginal es una alternativa para el tratamiento del prolapso apical con buenos resultados, tiempos operatorios y de recuperación acotados, además de bajas tasas de complicaciones. Objetivo: Evaluar la tasa de éxito anatómico y subjetivo en pacientes portadoras de un prolapso apical sometidas a FAUS en el Hospital de Quilpué a 24 meses de seguimiento. Materiales y método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo observacional descriptivo, seleccionando a todas las pacientes sintomáticas con un prolapso apical ≥ 2 de la clasificación de POP-Q, sometidas a una FAUS entre septiembre de 2014 y octubre de 2019. Los datos fueron obtenidos desde la base de datos de la unidad de uroginecología del Hospital de Quilpué, previa aprobación del comité de ética. El éxito objetivo se definió como un punto C a 1 centímetro sobre el himen y el éxito subjetivo con una escala de impresión de mejora global del paciente (PGI-I) mejor o mucho mejor y/o una escala visual analógica (EVA) mayor al 80%, a 24 meses de seguimiento. Resultados: Se incluyeron 46 pacientes. La tasa de éxito objetivo fue del 84% y de éxito subjetivo del 70%. Conclusiones: La FAUS transvaginal con suturas permanentes es una excelente alternativa para el tratamiento del prolapso apical con una tasa de éxito similar al gold standard a 24 meses de seguimiento.

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a frequent pathology that affects up to 60% of women. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament high fixation (USLs: utero-sacral ligaments) is an alternative for the treatment of apical prolapse with good results, limited operative and recovery times, as well as low rates of complications. Objective: To evaluate the anatomical and subjective success rate in patients with an apical prolapse undergoing STALUS at the Quilpué Hospital at 24 months of follow-up. Materials and method: A descriptive observational retrospective study was carried out, selecting all symptomatic patients with an apical prolapse ≥ 2 of the POP Q classification, submitted to a FAUS between September 2014 and October 2019. The data were obtained from the database of the Urogynecology Unit of the Quilpué Hospital, prior approval of the ethics committee. Objective success was defined as a C-point 1 centimeter above the hymen and subjective success with better or much better Patient Global Impression-Improvement (PGI-I) scale and/or a greater than 80% Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), at 24 months of follow-up. Results: 46 patients were included. The objective success rate was 84% and the subjective success rate was 70%. Conclusions: The transvaginal FAUS with permanent sutures is an excellent alternative for the treatment of apical prolapse with a success rate similar to the gold standard at 24 months of follow-up.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Urology has rapidly evolved during the last decades, incorporating new technologies faster than most specialties. The challenge to maintain a competent workforce that is prepared to deliver proper contemporary treatment has become increasingly difficult and newly graduated urologists throughout the world typically lack the skills to practice many urological subspecialties. We performed a survey to evaluate the practice patterns and educational aspirations in functional urology (FU) among Brazilian urologists. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to board-certified Brazilian urologists to collect data on clinical practice and training aspirations in four subareas of FU: female urology, urodynamics, postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI), and neurourology. We evaluated urologists' clinical and surgical workload in each subarea and investigated educational training aspirations to identify areas and training formats of interest. RESULTS: A total of 366 urologists (mean age 47.7 + 10.7 years) completed the survey. Mean time since completion of residency was 17.9 + 11.9 years. Of the respondents, 176 (53%) perform urodynamics, 285 (83.1%) SUI surgeries, 159 (47.6%) PPI surgeries, 194 (58.1%) third line OAB procedures, 168 (48.9%) pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and 88 (26.3%) bladder augmentation. Mid-urethral sling is the most performed SUI surgery and transobturator is the preferred route (64.0%). For those performing POP surgery, 40.5% use mesh in at least 50% of their cases, and the vaginal route is used in most cases (75.4%) for apical prolapse. For PPI, 64.6% use artificial sphincter in most surgeries and only 8.1% perform at least 5 surgeries/year. Being fellowship-trained and working in an academic hospital are associated with a higher chance of being active in FU. Most urologists are interested in receiving training in PPI, female SUI, and POP and a hands-on course is the preferred educational method (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Most urologists in Brazil are involved in the evaluation and treatment of FU patients, but few have a large volume of patient visits and surgical procedures. Completing a fellowship program and working in an academic practice are associated with a higher chance of being a FU practitioner. There is a high interest in training for PPI, female SUI, and POP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Background It has been observed that there is a high incidence of hemorrhoids in female patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Also, in these patients, hemorrhoidal disease improves after the surgical correction of the pelvic organ prolapse. Objective Our hypothesis was that a cause-effect relationship between pelvic organ prolapse, and hemorrhoids might be the key. The objective of this study was to find an element which connects these two conditions. Study Design We conducted a pilot study which consisted of two parts. An initial part, in which we asked several patients with grades III and IV pelvic organ prolapse and hemorrhoids, who have undergone surgery for prolapse, to determine the impact of the surgical restoration of the prolapsed organs on their hemorrhoidal disease. For the second part, on several patients with uncorrected uterine prolapse grades III and IV, we determined the resistive index of the hemorrhoidal branches within the rectal wall before and after manual reduction of the prolapse. Results First, more than 50% of patients who underwent uterine prolapse correction described an improvement of their hemorrhoidal disease of over 50%. Second, the resistive index of the hemorrhoidal branches was significantly lower after manual reduction of the prolapse. We consider that obstructed veins due to pelvic organ prolapse might induce the dilation of the hemorrhoids. The direct measurement of the resistive index of the hemorrhoidal branches allows us to directly assess the increased resistance in the rectal vascular system. Conclusion Venous stasis and impaired vascular flow might be the pathophysiological explanation for the association between pelvic organ prolapse and hemorrhoids. In these patients, the pathogenic treatment should aim at the restoration of a normal blood flow (prolapse surgical cure) instead of focusing on hemorrhoids only.(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: This study assesses resting genital hiatus (GH) measurements under anesthesia as compared with in-office measurements for intraoperative planning purposes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of general anesthesia and apical suspension on GH measurements compared with office measurements. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of women who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy within an academic urogynecology practice. Genital hiatus for each patient was measured at 4 time points: (1) preoperative office examination (baseline) at rest (GH rest ) and with strain (GH strain ); (2) following anesthesia induction, at rest (GH induction ); (3) immediately after sacrocolpopexy, at rest (GH colpopexy ); and (4) 4- to 6-week postoperative visit, strain (GH postop ). Enlarged baseline GH strain was defined as ≥4 cm. Paired statistics and analysis of variance were used for comparisons. RESULTS: Fifty-one women were included, whose mean age was 61.3 ± 8.2 years; the majority had stage ≥3 prolapse (n = 39 [76.4%]). Concomitant procedures included hysterectomy (n = 33 [64.7%]) and posterior colporrhaphy or perineorrhaphy (n = 8 [15.7%]). The majority had an enlarged baseline GH strain (n = 39 [76.4%]), and overall cohort mean was 4.7 ± 1.3 cm. Compared with baseline GH rest , mean GH induction was larger (GH induction : 4.6 ± 1.4 cm vs GH rest : 3.8 ± 1.2 cm, P < 0.01) but not different from baseline GH strain (GH induction : 4.6 ± 1.4 cm vs GH strain : 4.7 ± 1.3 cm, P = 0.81). GH colpopexy was decreased from baseline GH strain with a mean difference of 1.1 ± 1.3 cm ( P < 0.01). This difference was driven by women with enlarged baseline GH strain who experienced a mean decrease of 1.5 ± 1.1 cm ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Genital hiatus after induction of anesthesia does not significantly differ from preoperative straining GH. Apical suspension with sacrocolpopexy alone resulted in immediate reduction in GH measures, with greater decreases observed in women with enlarged preoperative GH.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Many health care providers place concomitant midurethral slings during pelvic organ prolapse repair, yet growing evidence supports staged midurethral sling placement. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare urinary function after transvaginal uterovaginal prolapse repair with and without midurethral sling. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial (hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension vs mesh hysteropexy). Our primary outcome was Urinary Distress Inventory score (UDI-6) through 5 years compared between women with and without a concomitant sling within prolapse repair arms. Sling effect was adjusted for select clinical variables and interaction terms (α = .05). RESULTS: The sling group included 90 women (43 hysteropexy, 47 hysterectomy), and the no-sling group included 93 women (48 hysteropexy, 45 hysterectomy). At baseline, the sling group reported more bothersome stress (66% vs 36%, P < 0.001) and urgency incontinence (69% vs 48%, P = 0.007). For hysteropexy, there were no significant long-term differences in UDI-6 scores or bothersome urine leakage between sling groups. For hysterectomy, women with sling had better UDI-6 scores across time points (adjusted mean difference, -5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.9 to -0.2); bothersome stress and urgency leakage were less common in the sling group (stress adjusted odds ratio, 0.1 [95% CI, 0.0-0.4]; urge adjusted odds ratio, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-1.0]). Treatment for stress incontinence over 5 years was similar in the sling (7.9%) versus no-sling (7.6%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year urinary outcomes of concomitant midurethral sling may vary by type of transvaginal prolapse surgery, with possible benefit of midurethral sling at the time of vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension but not after mesh hysteropexy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to investigate the rate of adherence to pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to identify factors associated with long-term (longer than 1 year) use of vaginal pessaries in Brazilian women with POP and its impact on quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A prospective observational study assessed 247 consecutive women candidates for a pessary to manage symptomatic POP. Patients were fitted with a ring pessary and follow-up visits were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. Pessary complications and reasons for discontinuation were recorded. Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) was applied at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. We used a logistic regression model for the analyses, with p < 0.05 for significance. RESULTS: A total of 236 women were included in the study, of whom 110 (46.6%) maintained the pessary treatment for longer than 12 months. The main reason for pessary discontinuation was the patient opting for surgery (50.8%). Vulvovaginitis was the main long-term complication (44.5%), followed by vaginal ulceration (16.4%) and urinary urgency (10%). No prior hysterectomy (OR = 2.26; 95% CI 1.19-4.31), vaginal estrogen use (OR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.06-3.52), and mean age (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) were variables associated with long-term use of vaginal pessary (p < 0.05 for all). Total P-QoL score significantly changed with pessary use (519.1 at baseline and 260 after 12-month treatment, p < 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that no prior hysterectomy, the local estrogen therapy, and age might be factors associated with use of a ring vaginal pessary for longer than 1 year. Long-term pessary users had a significant improvement in their quality of life.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

POP affected 40% of participants in the WHI trial. Risk factors include parity, vaginal delivery, large babies, advancing age, obesity, hysterectomy and lifting. Data suggest African-American women have a lower prevalence of symptomatic POP than other racial groups. Literature review did not show a study of risk factors and symptoms in a black population. Cross-sectional study of women with POP attending urogynaecology clinic at the UHWI from May to October 2013, using an interviewer administered questionnaire was performed and analysed using SPSS version 19 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). One hundred and eight participants were included: 94.7% postmenopausal (mean 65.08 years) and 94.5% parous (mean 4). Risk factors included obesity (mean BMI 28.82 kg/m2), hysterectomy (28.7%), heavy lifting (51.9%) and chronic cough (13.9%). Symptoms included stress incontinence (40.7%), stranguria (16.7%), faecal incontinence (13.9%), constipation (31.5%), coital urinary and faecal incontinence (6.3%, 12.6%). We concluded risk factors for POP in this population correlates with other studies. Stress urinary incontinence and constipation most frequently reported symptoms in this population.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition with multifactorial aetiology. As seen in systematic reviews (Vergeldt TFM, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. 2015. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. International Urogynecology Journal 26(11):1559-1573). Study shows white women appeared to have more overall symptoms both from prolapse, as well as urinary symptoms, as compared with black women (Ford AT, Eto CU, Smith M, Northington GM. 2019. Racial differences in pelvic organ prolapse symptoms among women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 25:130-133).What do the results of this study add? The result highlights the fact that Black women are exposed to similar risk factors and have similar symptoms to other racial groups for POP.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings can be used to educate women with risk factors about the possibility of developing symptomatic POP. Further research is needed to ascertain the prevalence of POP and to assess knowledge and attitude in this population as we hypothesise that there is generalised assumption in that being black is protective from POP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of surgical treatment of deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) on pelvic floor dysfunction (urinary incontinence [UI], pelvic organ prolapse [POP], fecal incontinence [FI)] or constipation, and sexual function [dyspareunia]). DATA SOURCE: The present systematic review was performed in the PubMed database. For the selection of studies, articles should be published by January 5, 2021, without language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: Six randomized controlled studies that evaluated surgical treatment for DIE and the comparison of different surgical techniques were included. DATA COLLECTION: The studies were selected independently by title and abstract by two authors. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. All included studies were also evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the quality of the evidence was analyzed using the GRADE criteria. Subgroup analysis by different treatments and follow-up periods was also performed. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The risk of bias between studies showed an uncertain risk of bias for most studies, with concealment of allocation being the least reported category. The quality of the evidence was considered low. High heterogeneity was found between the studies. No study has evaluated UI or POP comparatively before and after surgery. CONCLUSION: Dyspareunia and FI have improved after the surgical procedure, but it was not possible to demonstrate which surgical technique was related to these outcomes as there was surgical heterogeneity. This diversity was found across data, with the recommendation of future prospective studies addressing pelvic floor disorders with DIE.

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o impacto do tratamento cirúrgico para endometriose infiltrante profunda (EIP) nas disfunções do assoalho pélvico (incontinência urinária [IU], prolapso de órgãos pélvicos [POP], incontinência fecal [IF] ou constipação e função sexual [dispareunia]). FONTE DE DADOS: A presente revisão sistemática foi realizada na base de dados PubMed. Para a seleção dos estudos, os artigos deveriam ser publicados até 5 de janeiro de 2021, sem restrição de idioma. SELEçãO DOS ESTUDOS: Foram incluídos seis estudos randomizados e controlados que avaliaram o tratamento cirúrgico para EIP e a comparação de diferentes técnicas cirúrgicas. COLETA DE DADOS: Os estudos foram selecionados de forma independente por título e resumo por dois autores. As discordâncias foram avaliadas por um terceiro autor. Todos os estudos incluídos foram avaliados de acordo com a ferramenta Cochrane de risco de viés e a qualidade de evidência foi analisada usando os critérios GRADE. A análise de subgrupo por diferentes tratamentos e períodos de acompanhamento também foi realizada. RESULTADOS: Seis estudos foram incluídos na análise quantitativa. O risco de viés mostrou um risco incerto de viés para a maioria dos estudos, sendo a ocultação da alocação a categoria menos relatada. A qualidade de evidência foi considerada baixa. Alta heterogeneidade foi encontrada entre os estudos. Nenhum estudo avaliou a IU ou o POP comparativamente antes e após a cirurgia. CONCLUSãO: A dispareunia e a IF melhoraram após o procedimento cirúrgico, mas não foi possível demonstrar qual técnica cirúrgica esteve relacionada a estes desfechos, pois houve heterogeneidade cirúrgica. Esta diversidade foi encontrada nos dados, com a recomendação de estudos prospectivos futuros abordando distúrbios do assoalho pélvico com EIP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No consensus regarding the surgical strategy for repairs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has existed since the writings of Hippocrates. Archibald Donald of Manchester, in 1888, quite independently began to treat cases of prolapsus uteri with a combined operation of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and amputation of the cervix. OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical technique of Manchester-Fothergill and to chart its history. SEARCH STRATEGY: A bibliographic search was performed of the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: The terms "Manchester-Fothergill" AND "History" AND "Pelvic Organ Prolapse" were searched from the first publication on this topic (1951) to December 2020. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from studies independently by two authors. All types of relevant abstracts were selected and analyzed due to the scarcity of studies (books and documents, clinical trials, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial, review and systematic review). MAIN RESULTS: Although this is a well-described procedure in historic texts, the practical application is not often employed, and modern surgical texts rarely describe how to perform this surgery. The advantages of the Manchester-Fothergill technique include maintenance of the pelvic anatomy, integrity, a reduction of intraoperative blood loss, and shortened operation times and hospital stays. CONCLUSION: Many young gynecologists are not familiar with this operation; therefore, it is important to provide training and exposure to the Manchester-Fothergill technique in the practice of gynecological surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mesh-related complications resulting from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reconstruction operations may be a devastating experience leading to multiple and complex interventions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe the experience and time frame of management of mesh-related complications in women treated for POP or stress urinary incontinence in a tertiary center. METHODS: 1,530 cases of mesh-related complications were accessed regarding their clinical presentation, number of surgeries, and timeline of surgical treatments to treat multiple clinical complaints until the ultimate operation where all the meshes were removed in a single tertiary center. RESULTS: The studied population revealed to be a highly referred one with only 10.2% of the cases implanted at our center. Clinical presentation varied widely with 48.7% referring pain as the chief complaint, while 31.3% complained of voiding dysfunctions, 2.5% reported genital prolapses, 2.2% complained of vaginal problems, and 1.2% noted intestinal problems as the main clinical complaint. Only 4.8% of the cases presented mesh erosion at examination; 57.8% of the cases required more than 1 operation to address the mesh-related problems. Sixty-eight cases had more than 10 operations up to complete removal. Three clusters of patients could be identified: (i)-those from whom the mesh was promptly removed after clinical problems emerged, (ii) those with slowly evolving problems, and (iii) those with escalating problems despite treatment attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh-related complications after pelvic floor reconstruction are an evolving disease with diverse clinical presentation. The identified time-related problems and the multiple failed attempts to treat their complications warrant attention with continuous monitoring of these patients and aggressive removal of the mesh if the clinical complaint cannot be swiftly managed.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Sacral colpopexy is one of the standard procedures to treat apical pelvic organ prolapse. In most cases, a synthetic mesh is used to facilitate the colposuspension. Spondylodiscitis is a rare but potentially serious complication that must be promptly diagnosed and treated, despite the lack of consensus in the management of this complication. We report one case of spondylodiscitis after a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy treated conservatively. We also present a literature review regarding this rare complication. A conservative approach without mesh removal may be possible in selected patients (stable, with no vaginal lesions, mesh exposure or severe neurologic compromise). Hemocultures and culture of image-guided biopsies should be performed to direct antibiotic therapy. Conservative versus surgical treatment should be regularly weighted depending on clinical and analytical progression. A multidisciplinary team is of paramount importance in the follow-up of these patients.

A colpopexia sacral é um dos procedimentos padrão para tratar o prolapso de órgãos pélvicos apical. Na maioria dos casos, uma tela sintética é usada para facilitar a colposuspensão. A espondilodiscite é uma complicação rara, mas potencialmente grave, que deve ser prontamente diagnosticada e tratada, apesar da falta de consenso no manejo dessa complicação. Relatamos um caso de espondilodiscite após histerectomia supracervical laparoscópica e colpopexia sacral tratada conservadoramente. Também apresentamos uma revisão da literatura sobre essa complicação rara. Uma abordagem conservadora sem remoção da tela pode ser possível em pacientes selecionadas (estáveis, sem lesões vaginais, exposição da tela ou comprometimento neurológico grave). Hemoculturas e cultura de biópsias guiadas por imagem devem ser realizadas para direcionar a antibioticoterapia. O tratamento conservador versus o cirúrgico deve ser avaliado regularmente, dependendo da progressão clínica e analítica. Uma equipe multidisciplinar é de suma importância no acompanhamento desses pacientes.

Asunto(s)