RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis presents a challenging prognosis, with limited effective treatment options available. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a treatment strategy for this patient group. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer who underwent CRS + HIPEC treatment at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023. The study focused on assessing clinical features, the incidence of sever adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median OS was 24.2 months, suggesting an improvement over traditional therapies. While SAEs were noted, including two cases of severe complications necessitating additional surgical interventions, no perioperative fatalities were recorded. The overall survival time for patients with CC0/1 was not significantly different from that of patients with CC2/3, and no prognostic predictors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CRS and HIPEC appears to be a viable and promising treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer, offering an improved survival rate with manageable safety concerns. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and to explore the long-term benefits of this approach.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Terapia Combinada , Pronóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery is critical for optimal tumor clearance in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Despite best efforts, some patients may experience R2 (>1 cm) resection, while others may not undergo surgery at all. We aimed to compare outcomes between advanced EOC patients undergoing R2 resection and those who had no surgery. METHODS: Retrospective data from 51 patients with R2 resection were compared to 122 patients with no surgery between January 2015 and December 2019 at a UK tertiary referral centre. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the study endpoints. Principal Component Analysis and Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency scores were utilized for data discrimination and prediction of R>2 cm from computed tomography pre-operative reports, respectively. RESULTS: No statistical significance was observed, except for age (73 vs 67 years in the no- surgery vs R2 group, P: .001). Principal Components explained 34% of data variances. Reasons for no surgery included age, co-morbidities, patient preference, refractory disease, patient deterioration or disease progression, and absence of measurable intra- abdominal disease). The median PFS and OS were 12 and 14 months for no-surgery, vs 14 and 26 months for R2 (P: .138 and P: .001, respectively). Serous histology and performance status independently predicted PFS in both no-surgery and R2 cohorts. In the no-surgery cohort, serous histology independently predicted OS, while in the R2 cohorts, both serous histology and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic features for OS. The bi-grams "abdominopelvic ascites" and "solid omental" were amongst those best discriminating between R>2 cm and R1-2 cm. CONCLUSIONS: R2 resection and no-surgery cohorts displayed unfavourable prognosis with a notable degree of uniformity. When cytoreduction results in suboptimal results, the survival benefit may still be higher compared to those who underwent no surgery.
The study examined outcomes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent either R2 (suboptimal) surgical resection or received no surgery at all at a UK tertiary referral center. Sophisticated machine learning methodolgies were used to analyze data patterns and predict the extent of resection (>2 cm) from pre-operative CT reports. Reasons for not undergoing surgery included older age, presence of other medical conditions, patient preference, progressive disease, patient decline, or lack of detectable intra-abdominal disease. Factors like serous histology and performance status iinfluenced the risk of recurrence in both groups, while serous histology and adjuvant chemotherapy predicted the risk of death in the R2 group. Word sequences like "omental disease" and "reduced bulk" helped differentiate between R>2 cm and less extensive resections (R1-2 cm). In summary, both R2 resection and no-surgery groups had poor outcomes, but patients who underwent R2 resection generally had better survival compared to those who received no surgery, even when complete tumor removal was not achieved.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , AdultoRESUMEN
Immunotherapy-based systemic treatment (ST) is the standard of care for most patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has historically shown benefit for select patients with mRCC, but its role and timing are not well understood in the era of immunotherapy. The primary objective of this study is to assess outcomes in patients who received ST only, CN followed by ST (CN-ST), and ST followed by CN (ST-CN). The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis) database was queried to identify patients with de novo mRCC who received immunotherapy-based ST between January 2014 and June 2023. These patients were classified into three categories as described above. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of the timing of ST and CN on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), after adjusting for the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, age, and comorbidities. Best overall response and complications of ST and CN for these cohorts were collected. A total of 588 patients were included in this study: 331 patients received ST only, 215 patients received CN-ST, and 42 patients received ST-CN. Patient and disease characteristics including age, gender, performance status, IMDC risk category, comorbidity, histology, type of ST, and metastatic sites are reported. OS analysis favored patients who received ST-CN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.68) and CN-ST (HR 0.68, CI 0.47-0.97) over patients who received ST only. PFS analysis showed a similar trend for ST-CN (HR 0.45, CI 0.26-0.77) and CN-ST (HR 0.9, CI 0.68-1.17). This study examined baseline features and outcomes associated with the use and timing of CN and ST using real-world data via a large Canadian real-world cohort. Patients selected to receive CN after ST demonstrated improved outcomes. There were no appreciable differences in perioperative complications across groups. Limitations include the small number of patients in the ST-CN group and residual confounding and selection biases that may influence the outcomes in patients undergoing CN.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Canadá , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a treatment option for advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal surgery is required for better survival; however, while peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) has been identified as a prognostic factor, its comprehensive assessment during IDS remains unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate PWC efficacy during IDS, alongside other factors including residual disease and the modeled cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of 25 patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS between January 2017 to June 2023. RESULTS: Twelve (48.0%) patients were PWC-positive, and the remainder were PWC-negative. PWC was performed at laparotomy during IDS, after which five (41.7%) PWC-positive and four (30.8%) PWC-negative patients received bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, for maintenance treatment. Four (33.3%) PWC-positive and 10 (76.9%) PWC-negative patients received poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. In patients who received bevacizumab and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, overall survival and progression-free survival did not significantly differ between those who were PWC-positive and PWC-negative (p = 0.27 and 0.20, respectively). Progression-free survival significantly differed between those with favorable and unfavorable CA-125 KELIM (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis indicated that optimal surgery and favorable CA-125 KELIM were associated with better progression-free survival (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively), with only optimal surgery associated with better overall survival (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A positive PWC at IDS was not associated with survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Our findings indicate that although PWC status at IDS should be one of the factors determining survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recent improvements in maintenance therapy may make the combination of CA-125 KELIM and PWC status a more useful prognostic factor in selecting treatment after IDS. Further studies are needed to validate these results, highlighting the potential importance of maintenance treatment after IDS and the need for further research to validate the clinical significance of a positive PWC.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antígeno Ca-125/metabolismo , Lavado Peritoneal/métodos , CitologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Treatment of PMP consists of appendectomy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC. Right-sided hemicolectomy is necessary only when PMP is high grade, given the lymphatic invasion risk. To date, no single preoperative factor was identified as predictive of PMP grade. MATERIALS & METHODS: Preoperative factors of a prospective cohort study on PMP were retrospectively analyzed, in order to identify situations linked with high or low grade appendiceal PMP. The main outcome was PMP grade on definitive histology after CRS. RESULTS: n = 105. In univariate analysis, the grade of the appendiceal tumor, systematically reviewed in an expert center, showed an OR of 25.00 (95 % CI: 3.30-189.27; p = 0.001) and an NPV of 93.75 [85.36, 100]. Peritoneal biopsy demonstrated an OR of 19.80 (95 % CI: 2.30-170.71; p = 0.002) and a PPV of 90 [71.41, 100]. In multivariate analysis, these two factors remained significantly associated with PMP grade. CONCLUSION: Whenever appendiceal tumor is low grade on preoperative histology, the colon has to be spared unless completeness of CRS is compromised, which is a high-grade feature in fact. In case of high grade appendiceal tumor and/or peritoneal biopsy, right-sided hemicolectomy is warranted. If no histology is available preoperatively, adapt to intraoperative lesions as no preoperative factors seem to be predictive.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice , Colectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Seudomixoma Peritoneal , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Neoplasias del Apéndice/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/patología , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/cirugía , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Adulto , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
The prevention of intraperitoneal spread is of utmost importance in the management of advanced ovarian cancer (OC), thus demanding the exploration of innovative treatment techniques. The propensity of OC to spread to the peritoneum has highlighted the potential of local therapy as a promising approach. Among the proposed treatments thus far are several local intraperitoneal therapies, with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) being one of them. The application of HIPEC may potentially enhance the survival rates of patients with OC, as indicated by a recent publication of high-quality prospective data. The incorporation of HIPEC in conjunction with primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) does not have a significant impact on either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). However, the incorporation of HIPEC alongside interval CRS, followed by systemic chemotherapy (CTH), markedly enhances both OS and DFS. The most recent data also substantiates the effectiveness of HIPEC in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), resulting in an improvement of survival outcomes. Additional research will contribute to the improvement of the HIPEC regimen and technique, as well as the precise identification of patients who will gain the most advantage from this treatment approach. It is recommended to discuss and update (inter)national clinical guidelines for managing patients with advanced OC and peritoneal involvement.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Terapia Combinada , PronósticoRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Ovarian cancer, including tubal and peritoneal cancer, is the third most common gynecological cancer and the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancies in developed countries. This study explores the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in determining the optimal duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer. It also investigates the correlation between NLR dynamics and the KELIM score, a chemosensitivity marker, to enhance individualized therapeutic strategies. Materials and Methods: A total of 79 patients underwent NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or palliative care. The data collected included demographic information, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and laboratory parameters. The baseline NLR (NLR-T0) and post-therapeutic NLR (NLR-T1) were calculated, and their variation (NLR∆) was analyzed. The KELIM score was determined using CA-125 values. Results: Patients with a high baseline NLR (≥2.5) had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with a low NLR (<2.5). A negative NLR∆ was associated with poorer PFS and OS. The KELIM score indicated a more effective treatment response, with higher scores correlating with better outcomes. The majority of patients achieved R0 resection, and those with favorable KELIM scores showed improved survival rates. Conclusions: The NLR is a valuable prognostic marker for assessing treatment response and guiding NACT duration in advanced ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Ca-125 , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neutrófilos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Anciano , Adulto , Linfocitos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodosRESUMEN
Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma typically signifies an exceptionally poor prognosis, with patients rarely surviving beyond one year. An 83-year-old male presented to our hospital with complaints of headache and left-sided limb weakness. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the head and lungs disclosed a mass within the right temporal lobe, accompanied by peritumoral edema in the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) delineated a mass in the right temporal lobe, measuring 3 × 3 × 3 cm. He underwent cytoreductive surgery successively in the neurosurgery and urology departments. Despite experiencing postoperative tumour recurrence, the patient has lived close to four years to date. This case report illustrates that cytoreductive surgery combined with systemic pharmacotherapy can still confer significant survival benefits for elderly patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Lóbulo Temporal/patología , Lóbulo Temporal/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate the existing evidence regarding the comparison between en-bloc resection surgery and debulking surgery for spinal tumors, including both primary and metastatic tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, Web of Science, Scopus, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), and Wan Fang Database was carried out and included all studies that directly compared en-bloc resection surgery with debulking surgery for spinal tumors in patients through March 2024. The primary outcomes included recurrence rate, postoperative metastasis rate, mortality rate, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), complication, and so on. The statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: We systematically reviewed 868 articles and included 27 studies involving 1135 patients who underwent either en-bloc resection surgery (37.89%) or debulking surgery (62.11%). Our meta-analysis demonstrated significant advantages of en-bloc resection over debulking surgery. Specifically, the en-bloc resection group had a lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.13-0.28, P < 0.00001), lower postoperative metastasis rate (P = 0.002), and lower mortality rate (P < 0.00001). Additionally, en-bloc resection could improve OS and RFS (HR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.32-0.62, P < 0.00001 and HR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.17-0.80, P = 0.01, respectively). However, en-bloc resection required longer operative times and was associated with a higher overall complication rate compared to debulking surgery (P = 0.0005 and P < 0.00001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The current evidence indicates that en-bloc surgical resection can effectively control tumor recurrence and mortality, as well as improve RFS and OS for patients with spinal tumors. However, it is crucial not to overlook the potential risks of perioperative complications. Ultimately, these findings should undergo additional validation through multi-center, double-blind, and large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pronóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Muscle radiodensity loss after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with poor outcomes in ovarian cancer. Assessing muscle radiodensity is a real-world clinical challenge owing to the requirement for computed tomography (CT) with consistent protocols and labor-intensive processes. This study aimed to use interpretable machine learning (ML) to predict muscle radiodensity loss. METHODS: This study included 723 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy between 2010 and 2019 at two tertiary centers (579 in cohort 1 and 144 in cohort 2). Muscle radiodensity was assessed from pre- and post-treatment CT acquired with consistent protocols, and a decrease in radiodensity ≥ 5% was defined as loss. Six ML models were trained, and their performances were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and F1-score. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to interpret the ML models. RESULTS: The CatBoost model achieved the highest AUC of 0.871 (95% confidence interval, 0.870-0.874) and F1-score of 0.688 (95% confidence interval, 0.685-0.691) among the models in the training set and outperformed in the external validation set, with an AUC of 0.839 and F1-score of 0.673. Albumin change, ascites, and residual disease were the most important features associated with a higher likelihood of muscle radiodensity loss. The SHAP force plot provided an individualized interpretation of model predictions. CONCLUSION: An interpretable ML model can assist clinicians in identifying ovarian cancer patients at risk of muscle radiodensity loss after treatment and understanding the contributors of muscle radiodensity loss.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Automático , Neoplasias Ováricas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodosAsunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma is primary debulking surgery (PDS) aiming to complete cytoreduction. The need to achieve complete cytoreduction has shifted the surgical paradigm to more complex procedures, whose impact on morbidity is controversial. The objective of this retrospective analysis is to explore the impact of extensive PDS on morbidity and oncologic outcomes in a real-world scenario. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was performed on 137 patients with advanced high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) who received PDS in 2015-2020. Patients treated in 2015-2017 (Group 1) were compared to patients treated in 2018-2020 (Group 2). The two periods were chosen according to the higher complexity of surgical procedures introduced in 2018. RESULTS: The increase in complete cytoreduction observed in Group2 (RD 0: 33 % vs 61 %, p = 0,008) was related to a higher surgical complexity (Aletti Score: 4 vs 6, p = 0,003) and did not reflect an increase in peri-operative complications (CCI: 20,9 vs 20,9, p = 0,11). After a median FUP of 44 months, PFS and OS at 24 months were 33,60 % vs 47,33 % (p = 0,288) and 72,10 % vs 80,37 % (p = 0,022) in Group 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An extensive surgical effort leads to a significant increase in complete cytoreduction with acceptable morbidity. Arm-in-arm with novel maintenance therapies, it contributes to increasing the outcomes of patients with advanced HGOC.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although the management of gynecological cancers recurrences may be challenging, due to the heterogeneity of recurrent disease, the aim of this work is to present a descriptive analysis of gynecological malignancies recurrences in our institution treated by robotic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review and analysis of data of patients who underwent robotic surgery for recurrent gynecological malignancies at Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, Rome, from January 2013 to January 2024. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients underwent successful robotic cytoreductive surgery. The median age was 63 years; the median BMI was 33 kg/m2 and most of the patients (59 %) were obese. In 12 cases (22 %) the relapse presented was the second or third relapse. The most frequent patterns of recurrence were represented by lymph nodes (41 %), followed by peritoneal (26 %), pelvic (22 %) and parenchymal (11 %). In all patients complete cytoreduction was achieved. In 29 patients (54 %) the surgical field was previous treated. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were, respectively, 270 min and 100 ml. There were 2 intraoperative complications, managed endoscopically; 10 early postoperative complications, and 3 late postoperative complications. The 2-year progression-free-survival and overall survival were, respectively, 39.8 % and 72.3 %. CONCLUSION: Robotic approach in the treatment of recurrent gynecological cancers should be considered in selected patients with oligometastatic disease, in high-volume centers with expert surgeons, particularly in obese patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Adulto , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática , Obesidad/complicaciones , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This report describes the oncologic outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had bowel surgery performed by gynecologic oncologists (GOs) and compares the outcomes with those for bowel surgery performed by general surgeons (GSs) during maximal cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Patients from six academic institutions who had FIGO stage III or IV ovarian cancer and underwent any bowel surgeries during maximal cytoreductive surgery were eligible for the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether bowel surgery was performed by a GO or a GS. In both groups, the GOs were mainly involved in extra bowel debulking procedures. Perioperative and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The 761 patients in this study included 113 patients who underwent bowel surgery by a GO and 648 who had bowel surgery by a GS. No discernible differences were observed in age, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, FIGO stage, histologic type, timing of cytoreductive surgery (primary or interval debulking surgery), or complications between the two groups. The GO group exhibited a shorter operation time than the GS group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no survival differences between the two groups. In the Cox analysis, non-serous cell types and gross residual diseases were associated with adverse effects on overall survival. However, performance of bowel surgery by a GO did not have an impact on survival. CONCLUSION: Performance of bowel surgery by a GO during maximal cytoreductive surgery is both feasible and safe. These results should be reflected in the training system for GOs regarding bowel surgery, and further research is needed to confirm that GOs can play a more leading role in performing extra-uterine procedures.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Oncólogos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Anciano , Cirujanos , Pronóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirugía , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Adulto , GinecologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal primary debulking surgery outcome of serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC) is greatly affected by primary ovarian neoplasm or metastatic lesion close to the rectum. PURPOSE: To study the risk factors affecting postoperative residual primary ovarian neoplasm or metastatic lesion close to the rectum of SOC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical and MRI data of 164 patients with SOC eligible from institution A (training and test groups) and 36 patients with SOC eligible from institution B (external validation group) were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data included age, serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125), human epididymis protein 4, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data included ovarian mass distribution, maximum diameter of ovarian mass, ovarian mass features, degree of rectal invasion of the primary ovarian neoplasm or metastatic lesion, and amount of ascites. A model was established using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: By univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, CA-125 (P = 0.024, odds ratio [OR] = 3.798, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-13.32), NLR (P = 0.037, OR = 3.543, 95% CI = 1.13-12.72), and degree of rectal invasion of the primary ovarian neoplasm or metastatic lesion (P < 0.001, OR = 37.723, 95% CI = 7.46-266.88) were screened as independent predictors. The area under the curve values of the model in the training, test, and external validation groups were 0.860, 0.764, and 0.778, respectively. CONCLUSION: The clinical-radiological model based on T1-weighted dual-echo MRI can be used non-invasively to predict postoperative residual ovarian neoplasm or metastasis close to SOC in the rectum.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasia Residual , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Adulto , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/diagnóstico por imagen , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirugía , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Ovario/diagnóstico por imagen , Ovario/patología , Ovario/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex procedure that involves extensive peritoneal and visceral resections followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program aims to achieve faster recovery by maintaining pre-operative organ function and reducing the stress response following surgery. A recent publication introduced dedicated ERAS guidelines for CRS and HIPEC with the aim of extending the benefits to patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. METHODS: A survey was conducted among 21 Italian centers specializing in peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) treatment to assess adherence to ERAS guidelines. The survey covered pre/intraoperative and postoperative ERAS items and explored attitudes towards ERAS implementation. RESULTS: All centers completed the survey, demonstrating expertise in PSM treatment. However, less than 30 % of centers adopted ERAS protocols despite being aware of dedicated guidelines. Preoperative optimization was common, with variations in bowel preparation methods and fasting periods. Intraoperative normothermia control was consistent, but fluid management practices varied. Postoperative practices, including routine abdominal drain placement and NGT management, varied greatly among centers. The majority of respondents expressed an intention to implement ERAS, citing concerns about feasibility and organizational challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that Italian centers specialized in PSM treatment have limited adoption of ERAS protocols for CRS ± HIPEC, despite being aware of guidelines. The variability in practice highlights the need for standardized approaches and further evaluation of ERAS applicability in this complex surgical setting to optimize patient care.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Italia , Adhesión a Directriz , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To develop a pre-operative tool to estimate the risk of peri-operative packed red blood cell transfusion in primary debulking surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional database to identify patients who underwent primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer at a single center between January 1, 2001 and May 31, 2019. Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Five-fold cross-validation was applied to the multivariate model. Significant variables were assigned a 'BLOODS' (BLood transfusion Over an Ovarian cancer Debulking Surgery) score of +1 if present. A total BLOODS score was calculated for each patient, and the odds of receiving a transfusion was determined for each score. RESULTS: Overall, 1566 patients met eligibility criteria; 800 (51%) underwent a peri-operative blood transfusion. Odds ratios (OR) were statistically significant for American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 3 and 4 (OR 1.34, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09 to 1.63), pre-operative levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.98 to 2.99), platelets (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.74), obesity (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.96), presence of carcinomatosis (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.11), bulky upper abdominal disease (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.32 to 3.54), pre-operative serum albumin level (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.40), and pre-operative hemoglobin level (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.61). The corrected AUC was 0.748 (95% CI 0.693 to 0.804). BLOODS scores of 0 and 5 corresponded to 11% and 73% odds, respectively, of receiving a peri-operative blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a universal pre-operative scoring system, the BLOODS score, to help identify patients with ovarian cancer who would benefit from surgical planning and blood-saving techniques. The BLOODS score was directly proportional to the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of upper abdominal disease, carcinomatosis, CA125 level, and platelets level. We believe this model can help physicians with surgical planning and can benefit patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Anciano , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , AdultoRESUMEN
Introduction and objective: The approach to patients with advanced or metastatic high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has evolved over time with the advent of new therapies and multimodal strategies. The objective of this consensus of experts is to generate national recommendations for the profiling and management of advanced or metastatic high-grade OEC, defined as stages III and IV of the "The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification at the time of diagnosis to base on the literature review that included international evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Material and methods: Eleven panelists (oncologists and gynecological oncologists) answered 8 questions about the profiling and management of advanced or metastatic ovarian epithelial carcinoma. The panelists were chosen for their academic profile and influence in national health institutions. Guidelines from the "ESMO Standardized Operating Procedures Consensus Conference" were used to develop the consensus. It was agreed that the level of agreement to accept a recommendation should be ≥ 80%. The document was peer reviewed. Results: Eight general recommendations are made, which are presented into five domains. Some of these recommendations are subdivided into specific recommendations. Initial treatment Recommendation 1.1 Complete primary cytoreduction (PCS) surgery is suggested as the initial therapy of choice for patients with high-grade or metastatic EOC, which should ideally be carried out in centers with experience, followed by adjuvant therapy. 1.2 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreduction surgery (ICS) is suggested in those who are unlikely to achieve a complete cytoreduction in PCS either due to unresectable metastatic disease or who present unresectability criteria (imaging, laparoscopic and/or by laparotomy) and that have been defined by a gynecological oncologist and patients with poor functional status and comorbidities according to the criteria of the multidisciplinary team (clinical oncology, gynecological oncology, radiology, etc.). Recommendation 2. In patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), in stage III locally advanced or metastatic, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a complete or partial response (cytoreduction with tumor residue < 2.5 mm), the use of Hyperthermic IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) could be considered as an alternative to standard platinum-based adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy during interval cytoreductive surgery, after discussion in a multidisciplinary tumor board, at a center experienced in treating this type of patients. Use of genetic testing. Recommendation 3. It is suggested at the time of diagnosis to offer molecular genetic testing to all patients with high-grade advanced or metastatic EOC regardless of family history. Recommendation 4. It is suggested to offer genetic counseling, by qualified personnel, to all patients with high-grade advanced or metastatic EOC who are ordered genetic testing. Recommendation 5. It is suggested that all patients with advanced or metastatic high-grade EOC undergo a germ panel that includes the Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes 1/2 genes (BRCA 1/2) and the other susceptibility genes according to with institutional protocols and the availability of genetic testing panels; If it is negative, then somatic testing should be performed that includes the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, regardless of family history. Adjuvant Therapy Recommendation 6. 6.1. It is suggested that all patients with advanced stage III/IV EOC, with PSC of (0-2), got adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy as standard treatment within six weeks after Prc. It is suggested paclitaxel/carboplatin. Recommendation 6.2. It is suggested to use standard chemotherapy base on platinum plus Bevacizumab as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with high-risk disease (EOC stage IV or stage III with suboptimal tumor cytoreduction), following by bevacizumab as maintenance. The use of bevacizumab as maintenance therapy is not recommended if bevacizumab was not included in the first line of treatment. We suggested the dose used in GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. Recommendation 6.3 It is suggested combined intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy only for selected patients, with optimal cytoreduction (residual lesions < 1 cm), especially those without residual disease (R0) and who are evaluated in a multidisciplinary meeting. It is not considered standard treatment. Recommendation 6.4. 6.4.1 It is suggested to use Poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such as olaparib or niraparib as maintenance after receiving first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage III/IV BRCA1/2 positive EOC who received platinumbased chemotherapy and obtained complete response/partial response (CR/PR), 6.4.2 It is suggested to use olaparib alone or in combination with bevacizumab or niraparib in patients with stage III/IV BRCA1/2 positive EOC who received platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and achieved CR/PR. 6.4.3 It is suggested to use niraparibin patients with stage III/IV BRCA1/2 negative or unknown EOC who received platinum-based chemotherapy and achieved CR/PR. 6.4.4 It is suggested to use bevacizumab or olaparib plus bevacizumab in patients with EOC stage III/IV BRCA1/2 negative or unknown (HRD positive) who received platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and obtained CR/PR. Treatment of disease relapse Recommendation 7. Secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy is suggested for selected patients with high-grade advanced EOC in first relapse, platinum-sensitive (platinum-free interval ≥ 6 months), positive "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie AGO" score or "I-model" positive (< 4.7) with a potential resection to R0 in centers with access to optimal surgical and postoperative support. Note: Platinum-free interval and AGO score have only been developed as positive predictors of complete resection and not to exclude patients from surgery. Recommendation 8. 8.1 For patients with relapse advanced high-grade EOC platinum-sensitive, the following is suggested: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy: carboplatin/liposomal doxorubicin or carboplatin/paclitaxel or carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel or carboplatin/docetaxel or carboplatin/gemcitabine) for six cycles. If combination therapy is not tolerated, give carboplatin or cisplatin alone. Combination chemotherapy (carboplatin/gemcitabine or carboplatin/paclitaxel or carboplatin/doxorubicin liposomal) plus bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab as maintenance (until progression or toxicity). Recommendation 8.2 For patients with relapsed advanced high-grade EOC platinum-resistant, it is suggested: Sequential treatment with chemotherapy, preferably with a non-platinum single agent (weekly paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or docetaxel or oral etoposide or gemcitabine or trabectidine or, topotecan). Weekly paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan could be administrate with or without bevacizumab. Other agents are considered potentially active (capecitabine, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide) could be recommended for later lines. Hormone receptor-positive patients who do not tolerate or have no response to cytotoxic regimens may receive hormone therapy with tamoxifen or other agents, including aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole and letrozole) or leuprolide acetate, or megestrol acetate. Patients with a performance score ≥ 3 should be considered only for best supportive care. Recommendation 8.3 Maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors: It is suggested in patients with relapse advanced high-grade EOC stage III/IV BRCA1/2 (positive, negative or unknown) who have received two or more lines of platinum-based chemotherapy and have achieved CR/PR, use olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib. Niraparib could be useful in BRCA 1/2 +/-/unknown patients, as rucaparib, however, the latter does not yet have approval from the regulatory office in Colombia. Conclusions: It is expected that the recommendations issued in this consensus will contribute to improving clinical care, oncological impact, and quality of life of these women.
Introducción y objetivo: el abordaje de pacientes con cáncer epitelial de ovario (CEO) de alto grado avanzado o metastásico ha ido evolucionando a través del tiempo con el advenimiento de nuevas terapias y estrategias multimodales. El objetivo de este consenso de expertos es generar recomendaciones nacionales para el perfilamiento y manejo del CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico, definido como estadios III y IV de la clasificación de la Federación Internacional de Ginecología y Obstetricia (FIGO) al momento del diagnóstico, a partir de la revisión de la literatura que incluyó guías de práctica clínica (GPC) internacionales basadas en la evidencia. Materiales y métodos: once panelistas (oncólogos y ginecólogos oncólogos) respondieron ocho preguntas sobre el perfilamiento y manejo del carcinoma epitelial de ovario avanzado o metastásico. Los panelistas fueron escogidos por su perfil académico e influencia en instituciones de salud nacionales. Para el desarrollo del consenso se utilizaron los lineamientos de la "Conferencia de consenso de procedimientos operativos estandarizados de ESMO". Se definió que el nivel de acuerdo para aceptar una recomendación debía ser ≥ 80%. El documento fue revisado por pares. Resultados: Se hacen 8 recomendaciones generales, presentadas en cinco dominios; algunas de ellas se subdividen en recomendaciones específicas. Tratamiento inicial Recomendación 1 1.1. Como terapia inicial de elección para pacientes con CEO de alto grado o metastásico se sugiere la cirugía de citorreducción primaria (Cpr) completa que, idealmente, debe realizarse en centros con experiencia, seguida de terapia adyuvante. 1.2. Se sugiere quimioterapia neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía de citorreducción de intervalo (Cint) en quienes sea improbable alcanzar una citorreducción completa en la Cpr, bien sea por enfermedad metastásica no resecable o que presenten criterios de irresecabilidad (imagenológicos, laparoscópicos o por laparotomía) que hayan sido definidos por un ginecólogo oncólogo. También en pacientes con un pobre estado funcional y comorbilidades de acuerdo con el criterio del equipo multidisciplinario (oncología clínica, ginecología oncológica, radiología, etc.). Recomendación 2. En pacientes con CEO de alto grado, en estadio III localmente avanzado o metastásico, que recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante y alcanzaron respuesta completa o parcial (citorreducción con residuo tumoral < 2,5 mm), se podría evaluar el uso de la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (Hyperthermic IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy - HIPEC) como alternativa a la quimioterapia IV adyuvante estándar basada en platinos durante la Cint, previa discusión en junta multidisciplinaria, en un centro de experiencia en este tipo de pacientes. Uso de pruebas genéticas Recomendación 3. Al momento del diagnóstico, se sugiere ofrecer testeo molecular genético a toda paciente con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico, independientemente de la historia familiar. Recomendación 4. Se sugiere ofrecer asesoramiento genético, por parte de personal calificado, a toda paciente con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico a quien se le ordene un testeo genético. Recomendación 5. Se sugiere que a toda paciente con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico se le realice panel germinal que incluya los genes de susceptibilidad al cáncer de mama 1/2 (BRCA 1/2) y los otros genes de susceptibilidad de acuerdo con los protocolos institucionales y la disponibilidad de paneles de testeo genético; si es negativo entonces se debería realizar testeo somático que incluya el estatus de deficiencia de la recombinación homóloga (homologous recombination deficiency - HRD), independientemente de la historia familiar. Terapia adyuvante Recomendación 6 6.1. Se sugiere que a toda paciente con CEO estadios III/IV avanzado o metastásico, con estatus de desempeño (performance score care - PSC) de 0-2 se le administre como tratamiento estándar quimioterapia intravenosa (IV) adyuvante dentro de las seis semanas posteriores a la Cpr. Se sugiere administrar paclitaxel/carboplatino. 6.2. Se sugiere utilizar quimioterapia estándar basada en platino más bevacizumab como adyuvancia en pacientes con enfermedad de alto riesgo (CEO estadios IV o III con citorreducción tumoral subóptima), continuando con bevacizumab como mantenimiento. No se recomienda el uso de bevacizumab como terapia de mantenimiento si no se incluyó en la primera línea de tratamiento. Se sugiere seguir los esquemas de los estudios Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG-0218) e International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON7). 6.3. Se sugiere la quimioterapia combinada IV/intraperitoneal (IP) solo para pacientes seleccionadas, con una citorreducción óptima (lesiones residuales < 1 cm), en especial aquellas sin enfermedad residual (R0) y que sean evaluadas en junta multidisciplinaria. La quimioterapia combinada IV/IP no se considera como tratamiento estándar. 6.4. 6.4.1. Se sugiere utilizar inhibidores de poli(ADP-ribosa) polimerasa (PARP) tales como olaparib o niraparib como mantenimiento después de recibir una primera línea de quimioterapia en pacientes con CEO estadios III/IV BRCA1/2 positivo que recibieron quimioterapia basada en platino y obtuvieron respuesta completa/respuesta parcial (RC/RP). 6.4.2. Se sugiere utilizar olaparib solo o en combinación con bevacizumab o niraparib en pacientes con CEO estadios III/IV BRCA1/2 positivo que recibieron quimioterapia basada en platino más bevacizumab y obtuvieron RC/RP. 6.4.3. Se sugiere utilizar niraparib en pacientes con CEO estadio III/IV BRCA1/2 negativo o desconocido que recibieron quimioterapia basada en platino y obtuvieron RC/RP. 6.4.4. Se sugiere utilizar bevacizumab u olaparib más bevacizumab en pacientes con CEO estadios III/IV BRCA1/2 negativo o desconocido (HRD positivo) que recibieron quimioterapia basada en platino más bevacizumab y obtuvieron RC/RP. Tratamiento de la recaída de la enfermedad Recomendación 7. Se sugiere la realización de la cirugía de citorreducción secundaria (Csec), seguida de quimioterapia, a pacientes seleccionadas con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico en primera recaída, platino-sensibles (intervalo libre de platinos ≥ 6 meses), puntuación Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) positiva o Integrate model (I-Model) positivo (< 4,7), y con una potencial resección a R0, en centros con acceso a soporte quirúrgico y posoperatorio óptimo. Nota: el intervalo libre de tratamiento con platinos y la puntuación AGO solo se han desarrollado como predictores positivos de resección completa y no para excluir a las pacientes de la cirugía. Recomendación 8 8.1. Para pacientes con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico en recaída platino-sensibles se sugiere: Quimioterapia combinada basada en platino: carboplatino/doxorrubicina liposomal o carboplatino/paclitaxel o carboplatino/ nab-paclitaxel o carboplatino/docetaxel o carboplatino/gemcitabina, por seis ciclos. Si no se tolera la terapia combinada, dar carboplatino o cisplatino solo. Quimioterapia combinada: carboplatino/gemcitabina o carboplatino/paclitaxel o carboplatino/doxorubicina liposomal, más bevacizumab, seguida de bevacizumab como mantenimiento (hasta progresión o toxicidad). 8.2. Para pacientes con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico en recaída, platino-resistentes, se sugiere: Tratamiento secuencial con quimioterapia, preferiblemente con un agente único que no sea un platino (paclitaxel semanal o doxorrubicina liposomal pegilada o docetaxel o etopósido oral o gemcitabina o trabectidina o topotecan). El paclitaxel semanal o la doxorrubicina liposomal pegilada o el topotecan pueden ser administrados con o sin bevacizumab. Existen otros agentes que se consideran potencialmente act ivos (capecitabina, ciclofosfamida, ifosfamida, irinotecán, oxaliplatino, pemetrexed, vinorelbina, ciclofosfamida), que se podrían recomendar para líneas posteriores. Las pacientes con receptores hormonales positivos que no toleran o no tienen respuesta a los regímenes citotóxicos pueden recibir terapia hormonal con tamoxifeno u otros agentes, incluidos los inhibidores de la aromatasa (anastrozol y letrozol) o acetato de leuprolide o acetato de megestrol. Pacientes con PSC ≥ 3 deberían ser consideradas solo para el mejor cuidado de soporte. 8.3. Terapia de mantenimiento con inhibidores PARP. Para pacientes con CEO de alto grado avanzado o metastásico en recaída estadios III/IV BRCA1/2 (positivo, negativo o desconocido), que hayan recibido dos o más líneas de quimioterapia basada en platino y hayan alcanzado RC/RP, se sugiere utilizar olaparib, niraparib o rucaparib. El niraparib podría ser útil en pacientes BRCA 1/2 +/-/desconocido, al igual que el rucaparib, sin embargo, este último no tiene aún aprobación del ente regulador en Colombia. Conclusiones: se espera que las recomendaciones emitidas en este consenso contribuyan a mejorar la atención clínica, el impacto oncológico y la calidad de vida de estas mujeres.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/diagnóstico , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/terapia , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/diagnóstico , Consenso , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with rapid disease progression. Hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) done immediately after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has become an important treatment for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients. However, different treatment options for HIPEC exist with potential influence on survival rates and prognosis in patients, exist. These treatment options include open or closed abdomen technique, perfusion solution, number of catheters, temperature, duration, and drug regimens. This paper aims to provide more evidence on standardization of HIPEC treatment options and technologies by systematically reviewing different drug regimens and technical approaches. The study included 2 randomized controlled trials, 3 phase I/II clinical trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 34 retrospective cohort studies, involving 1511 patients. The most common HIPEC option is to dissolve 50-75 mg/m2 of Cisplatin and 30-40 mg/m2 of Mitomycin C in 3-4 L saline solution at 42-43â. After gastrointestinal anastomosis, 2-3 catheters are used in the HIPEC system with a perfusion flow rate of 500 ml/min. The duration is 60-90 minutes. Anastomotic leakage was low in studies where HIPEC was performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis. The utilization of open HIPEC and a two-drug regimen resulted in improved overall survival rates. The future development of HIPEC aims to enhance tumor-specific therapy by optimizing various aspects, such as identifying the safest and most effective chemotherapy regimens, refining patient selection criteria, and improving perioperative care.