Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 852
Filtrar
1.
Semin Vasc Surg ; 37(2): 101-110, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151990

RESUMEN

Appropriate use criteria (AUC) aim to impact the provision of high-value care. This scoping review identified AUC regarding the procedural and operative treatment of cardiovascular disease and described the evolution of AUC in this space over time, including changes in the focus, strategy, and language of AUC. The summative presentation of these AUC identifies elements of AUC that may lead to successes in, and barriers to, implementation across disease processes, specialties, and societies. AUC topics include coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, valvular disease, venous disease, renal artery stenosis, and mesenteric ischemia, among others.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas
2.
Semin Vasc Surg ; 37(2): 188-209, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151998

RESUMEN

Intermittent claudication (IC) is a phenotype of peripheral artery disease that is characterized by pain in the lower extremity muscles during activity that is relieved by rest. Medical management, risk factor control, smoking cessation, and exercise therapy have historically been the mainstays of treatment for IC, but advances in endovascular technology have led to increasing use of peripheral vascular interventions in this patient population. There are meaningful differences in published society guidelines and appropriate use criteria relevant to the management of IC, especially regarding indications for peripheral vascular interventions. The current review aims to highlight similarities and differences between major society recommendations for the management of IC, and to discuss practice trends, disparities, and evidence gaps in the use of peripheral vascular interventions for IC in the context of existing guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Claudicación Intermitente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Europa (Continente) , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
3.
Semin Vasc Surg ; 37(2): 150-155, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151994

RESUMEN

Chronic superficial venous disease, including superficial venous insufficiency, superficial venous thrombosis, and aneurysms, are prevalent conditions that affect millions of individuals worldwide. With chronic venous insufficiency specifically, the advent of office-based minimally invasive procedures in recent decades has significantly expanded access to outpatient treatment. However, as venous insufficiency is rarely life- or limb-threatening, the clinical diagnosis, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment indications should be considered carefully when recommending elective intervention. Appropriateness of care guidelines intend to aid providers and patients in the decision-making process, based on the available evidence in the scientific literature, to select the best care for the patient when treating their superficial venous disease.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Insuficiencia Venosa , Humanos , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Aneurisma/terapia , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/cirugía
4.
Semin Vasc Surg ; 37(2): 111-117, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151991

RESUMEN

Vascular surgeons have the ability to manage and intervene on numerous vascular diseases of both the arterial and venous systems. With the growing number of interventions available as endovascular technology evolves, it is important to determine when a procedure is safely indicated for a vascular surgery patient. Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) offer synthesized clinical information and practice standards that can aid clinicians in making these management decisions. Professional societies, such as the Society for Vascular Surgery, bring experts in the field together to collaborate and create AUC for various vascular diseases and interventions. It is essential to publish these criteria in peer-reviewed journals, as well as make them available on public websites so the information is available to vascular surgeons and interventionalists from other specialties who also treat patients with vascular disease. Cardiology, interventional radiology, and interventional nephrology are some other specialties that perform procedures for vascular disease, and vascular interventions by nonsurgeon specialists continue to increase. The Society for Vascular Surgery has published AUC on intermittent claudication, carotid disease, and abdominal aneurysm management. These are intended to guide practice, but also have highlighted areas for improvement that would allow for more universal implementation of AUC in vascular patient care across medical specialties. Increased intersocietal participation and perhaps inclusion of government and other payer participation will allow professional society-sponsored AUC to evolve, resulting in coordinated, appropriate care for vascular surgery patients.


Asunto(s)
Sociedades Médicas , Enfermedades Vasculares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Consenso , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Cirujanos/normas , Comités Consultivos/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Semin Vasc Surg ; 37(2): 249-257, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39152003

RESUMEN

Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses a significant treatment challenge for vascular surgeons, interventionalists, podiatrists, and associated medical specialists. The evidence for what constitutes appropriate care is rapidly evolving and new treatment options are in constant development. This review examines the current guidelines for CLTI care, as well as reported outcomes for multiple care strategies in this patient population, including revascularization and medical optimization. We performed a literature review of the PubMed database, reviewing articles that reported outcomes for CLTI care between 2000 and 2023, and described these outcomes as they relate to the current state of CLTI treatment. Significant data are still forthcoming regarding CLTI care, but widespread adoption of appropriate CLTI care is essential for the treatment of this vulnerable population.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Isquemia/terapia , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Crónica
6.
Semin Vasc Surg ; 37(2): 218-223, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39152000

RESUMEN

There is variation in the management of small aneurysms in the United States today, with some surgeons moving forward with elective repair and others practice ongoing surveillance. Literature exists to suggest that small aneurysms are repaired at a higher rate than should be considered acceptable, and this represents a deviation from current standards of care. To best understand the optimal care of this patient population, this article aims to evaluate the current management of small aneurysms, review contemporary guidelines and the literature behind them, and assess the appropriateness of surgical management of small aneurysms.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Selección de Paciente , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
14.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 68(2): 152-160, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697257

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgery registries report on procedures and outcomes to promote patient safety and drive quality improvement. International registries have contributed significantly to the VASCUNET collaborative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outcome projects. This scoping review aimed to outline the national registries in vascular surgery that currently participate in the VASCUNET collaborative AAA projects. METHODS: A scoping review of all published VASCUNET AAA studies and validation reports between 1997 and 2024 was undertaken. A survey was conducted among representatives of the international vascular registries contributing to VASCUNET collaborative AAA projects. RESULTS: Currently, vascular registries from 10 countries (Australia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK) contribute to the current VASCUNET collaborative AAA project, of which eight have national coverage. In the past, three countries (Germany, Malta, and Italy) have participated in previous VASCUNET AAA projects, and a further three countries (Serbia, Greece, and Portugal) have planned participation in future projects. External validity is high for all current registries, with most reporting rates of > 90%. The majority have internal validation processes to assess data accuracy. VASCUNET mediated validation has also been performed by the consortium for five countries to date (Hungary, Sweden, Denmark, Malta, and Switzerland), for which a high degree of external and internal validity was identified. Most registries have established mechanisms for data linkage with national administrative datasets or insurance claims datasets and contribute to quality improvement through regular reporting to participating centres. CONCLUSION: National vascular registries from nations participating in the VASCUNET collaborative AAA projects are largely comprehensive, with high case ascertainment rates and good quality data with internal quality assurance. This provides a template for new registries wishing to join the VASCUNET collaboration and a benchmark for future research.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Sistema de Registros , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Cooperación Internacional , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
15.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 107: 186-194, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582205

RESUMEN

The clinical judgment of a physician is one of the most important aspects of medical quality, yet it is rarely captured with quality measures in use today. We propose a novel approach using individualized physician benchmarking that measures the appropriateness of care that a physician delivers by looking at their practice pattern in a specific clinical situation. A prime application of our novel approach to appropriateness measures is the surgical management of peripheral artery disease and claudication. We discuss 4 potential consensus metrics for the treatment of claudication that explore appropriateness of care of claudication management and are meaningful, actionable, and quantifiable. Given the multitude of medical specialties involved in the care of patients with peripheral artery disease and the consequences of both preemptive and delayed care, it is in all of our interests to promote data transparency with confidential communications to outlier physicians while advocating for evidence-based management.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Claudicación Intermitente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Humanos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Benchmarking/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Consenso , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 189-200, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric extremity vascular injuries constitute a rare yet serious entity that can lead to serious complications especially if left untreated or become late diagnosed. In our scoping review, we sought to evaluate different characteristics and outcomes of pediatric and combined adult trauma centers (ATCs) in the management of pediatric extremity vascular injury. METHODS: We sought to analyze various characteristics and parameters that differentiate a dedicated pediatric and a combined pediatric ATC in terms of effectiveness and quality of care in the acute setting and to describe special features and characteristics of an acute vascular disease that constitute pediatric population unique from the aspect of diagnosis and management. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews guidelines to conduct the study. RESULTS: The search identified 8,815 records in title using MeSH terms from PubMed/MEDLINE database among which 12 studies reporting a total of 2,124 pediatric patients with vascular extremity injuries were included for analysis. Incidence of pediatric extremity vascular injury was 0.5%. Upper extremity injuries were the most frequent presenting in 63% of cases followed by lower extremity injuries in 37% of cases. Blunt injuries were marginally more common than penetrating injuries (58% vs. 42%). In-hospital mortality and morbidity ranged from 13.2% to 0.9% and 13% to 30%, respectively. Limb-salvage rates were high, ranging from 92% to 99%. Furthermore, there are no clearly defined clinical guidelines involving the mode of imaging and diagnosis, the surgical specialties involved and the competency of nursing or medical staff overall. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated children trauma centers theoretically represent the optimal path for acute pediatric trauma admission, especially in complex trauma necessitating vascular reconstruction. However, in the current setting of rapidly increasing health costs and economic crisis worldwide, regional or resource-related factors make this option rather unavailable. In any case, it is imperative the clinicians have a high index of suspicion when confronting with these types of injuries because early diagnosis is highly related with reduced morbidity and superior outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Niño , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Preescolar , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidades/lesiones , Factores de Tiempo
19.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 67(5): 738-745, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185375

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quality of patient information material regarding elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair on the internet using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (MEQIP) tool. METHODS: A qualitative assessment of internet based patient information was performed. The 12 most used search terms relating to AAA repair were identified using Google Trends, with the first 10 pages of websites retrieved for each term searched. Duplicates were removed, and information for patients undergoing elective AAA were selected. Further exclusion criteria were marketing material, academic journals, videos, and non-English language sites. The remaining websites were then MEQIP scored independently by two reviewers, producing a final score by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 1 297 websites were identified, with 235 (18.1%) eligible for analysis. The median MEQIP score was 18 (interquartile range [IQR] 14, 21) out of a possible 36. The highest score was 33. The 99th percentile MEQIP scoring websites scored > 27, with four of these six sites representing online copies of hospital patient information leaflets, however hospital sites overall had lower median MEQIP scores than most other institution types. MEQIP subdomain median scores were: content, 8 (IQR 6, 11); identification, 3 (IQR 1, 3); and structure, 7 (IQR 6, 9). Of the analysed websites, 77.9% originated from the USA (median score 17) and 12.8% originated in the UK (median score 22). Search engine ranking was related to website institution type but had no correlation with MEQIP. CONCLUSION: When assessed by the MEQIP tool, most websites regarding elective AAA repair are of questionable quality. This is in keeping with studies in other surgical and medical fields. Search engine ranking is not a reliable measure of quality of patient information material regarding elective AAA repair. Health practitioners should be aware of this issue as well as the whereabouts of high quality material to which patients can be directed.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Información de Salud al Consumidor , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Internet , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA