RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The study aims to describe midterm outcomes following treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with short necks by endosutured aneurysm repair using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor system. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from 9 vascular surgery departments between June 2010 and December 2019, including treated AAAs with neck lengths ≤10 mm. The decision for the use of EndoAnchors was made by the treating surgeon or multidisciplinary aortic committee according to each center's practice. There were 2 Groups further assessed according to neck length, A (≥4 and <7 mm) and B (≥7 and ≤10 mm). The main outcomes analyzed were technical success, freedom from type Ia endoleaks (TIaELs), sac size increase, all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included in the study, 17 fell into Group A and 59 into Group B. Median follow-up for the cohort was 40.5 (interquartile range 12-61) months. A median of 6 (interquartile range 3) EndoAnchors were deployed in each subject. Technical success was 86.8% for the total group, 82.4% and 88.1% (P = 0.534) for Groups A and B respectively. Six out of 10 (60%) of TIaELs at the completion angiographies showed spontaneous resolution. Cumulative freedom from TIaEL at 3 and 5 years for the total group was 89% and 84% respectively; this was 93% and 74% for Group A and 88% at both intervals in Group B (P = 0.545). In total, there were 7 (9.2%) patients presenting with TIaELs over the entire study period. Two (11.8%) in Group A and 5 (8.5%) in Group B (P = 0.679). There were more patients with sac regression in Group B (Group A = 6-35.3% vs. Group B = 34-57.6%, P = 0.230) with no statistical significance. All-cause mortality was 19 (25%) patients, with no difference (4-23.5% vs. 15-25.4%, P = 0.874) between groups; whereas aneurysm-related mortality occurred in 1 patient from Group A and 3 from Group B. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates reasonable outcomes for patients with short-necked AAAs treated by endosutured aneurysm repair in terms of TIaELs up to 5-year follow-up. EndoAnchor use should be judiciously evaluated in short necks and may be a reasonable option when anatomical constraints are encountered, mainly for those with 7-10 mm neck lengths. Shorter neck length aspects, as indicated by the results from Group A, may be an alternative when no other options are available or feasible.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Endofuga , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endofuga/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana EdadAsunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Cardiopatías , Trombosis , Humanos , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías/etiología , Cardiopatías/terapia , Masculino , Remoción de Dispositivos , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Femenino , Niño , Trombectomía/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
Background: The decision to close patent ductus arteriosus should always be individualized and taken together with the child's family once the risks and benefits of both choices have been exposed. Objective: This study aims to report the experience and outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular closure of small to medium-size PDA with a Nit-Occlud® device in a tertiary referral hospital in Colombia. Methods: Longitudinal descriptive study, which included all patients under 18 years of age who underwent percutaneous ductal closure with Nit-Occlud® device between January 1, 2011, and February 1, 2023. Patients with associated complex congenital heart disease requiring surgical management, pregnant patients, and patients with incomplete data regarding studied variables were excluded from the study. Results: Eighty-seven patients were documented, with a mean age, weight, and height at closure of 51 months, 14 kg, and 95.83 cm, respectively. About 70% of the patients (n = 61) were female, 76% were under 6-years-old and only one patient was over 15. The average size of the ductus at the pulmonary end was 2 mm. Four of the total number of patients did not achieve PDA closure during the procedure. Of the remaining 83, complete immediate closure was achieved in 81 patients. A device exchange for a larger device was required during the same procedure in one of the cases. Two patients presented residual shunt of 0.5 mm during follow-up, and one required a new procedure for device closure 10 months later. Only one device presented repeatedly embolization to the aorta, requiring surgical removal. As a technical difficulty, one device presented repeated passage into the aorta, so it was decided to remove it before releasing it to avoid complications, and given the complex anatomy of the ductus, surgical closure was indicated. Among the complications, one patient presented a hematoma of the subcutaneous tissue in the right thigh, which improved with medical management, and no deaths related to the procedure were registered. Conclusions: Using the Nit-Occlud® device to close small to moderate-sized ductus remains a safe and effective strategy with successful closure rates at 1-year follow-up irrespective of age, weight, height, or whether it involves a small or medium-sized duct. Despite our limitations, results concerning adverse effects are comparable to those observed in multicentric studies conducted in other regions.
Antecdentes: La decisión de cerrar el conducto arterioso permeable (CAP) siempre debe ser individualizada y tomada en conjunto con la familia del niño una vez expuestos los riesgos y beneficios de ambas opciones. Objetivo: Este estudio tiene como objetivo informar la experiencia y los resultados en pacientes sometidos a cierre endovascular del CAP de tamaño pequeño a mediano con un dispositivo Nit-Occlud® en un hospital de tercer nivel de referencia en Colombia. Método: Estudio descriptivo longitudinal, que incluyó a todos los pacientes menores de 18 años a quienes se les realizó cierre ductal percutáneo con dispositivo Nit-Occlud® entre el 1 de enero de 2011 y el 1 de febrero de 2023. Se excluyeron: pacientes con cardiopatía congénita compleja asociada que requirieron manejo quirúrgico, pacientes embarazadas y pacientes con datos incompletos sobre las variables estudiadas. Resultados: Se documentaron 87 pacientes, con edad, peso y talla promedio al cierre de 51 meses, 14 kg y 95.83 cm, respectivamente. El 70% de los pacientes (n = 61) eran mujeres, el 76% tenían menos de seis años y solo un paciente tenía más de 15 años. El tamaño medio del conducto en el extremo pulmonar fue de 2 mm. Cuatro del total de pacientes no lograron el cierre del CAP durante el procedimiento. De los 83 restantes, se logró el cierre inmediato completo en 81 pacientes. En uno de los casos fue necesario cambiar el dispositivo por uno más grande durante el mismo procedimiento. Dos pacientes presentaron shunt residual de 0.5 mm durante el seguimiento y uno requirió un nuevo procedimiento para cierre del dispositivo diez meses después. Solo un dispositivo presentó embolización repetida en la aorta, requiriendo extracción quirúrgica. Como dificultad técnica, un dispositivo presentó paso repetido hacia la aorta, por lo que se decidió retirarlo antes de liberarlo para evitar complicaciones y dada la compleja anatomía del ductus se indicó cierre quirúrgico. Entre las complicaciones, un paciente presentó un hematoma del tejido subcutáneo en el muslo derecho, que mejoró con el manejo médico, y no se registraron muertes relacionadas con el procedimiento. Conclusiones: El uso del dispositivo Nit-Occlud® para cerrar conductos de tamaño pequeño a moderado sigue siendo una estrategia segura y eficaz con tasas de cierre exitoso al año de seguimiento, independientemente de la edad, el peso, la altura o si se trata de un conducto de tamaño pequeño o mediano. A pesar de nuestras limitaciones, los resultados sobre los efectos adversos son comparables a los observados en estudios multicéntricos realizados en otras regiones.
Asunto(s)
Conducto Arterioso Permeable , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Femenino , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/cirugía , Colombia , Masculino , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Longitudinales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a minimally invasive endovascular treatment option for patients with cerebral aneurysms. Transradial access (TRA) is a technique that involves accessing the arterial system through the radial artery in the wrist rather than the femoral artery in the groin. Several studies have investigated the use of TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. The databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. To reduce the risk of bias, this systematic review only included studies reporting on using TRA in WEB device deployment for intracranial aneurysm treatment with a minimum of four patients. RESULTS: In this systematic review, 186 patients were included across five studies, with TRA used in 183 cases analyzed. The study population had a higher proportion of females (n = 118%-69%) than males, with a mean age of 62 years old. Among the aneurysms treated, 46 were ruptured, and 119 were located at bifurcation sites, with a mean maximum diameter/width of 6.6 mm and mean height of 5.9 mm. Adjunctive coiling was used in three cases, and adjunctive stenting was used in nine cases. In two cases, conversion to a femoral artery access was necessary. CONCLUSION: The available results suggest TRA with the WEB device is a safe and effective alternative. However, using TRA versus TFA should be individualized based on patient factors and operator experience.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraneal , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Aneurisma Intracraneal/terapia , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/cirugía , StentsRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, often associated with specific risk factors. The primary treatment for CVST is anticoagulation, but some cases progress to Refractory CVST (rCVST), requiring endovascular treatment. A combination of stent retriever and catheter aspiration is emerging as a promising technique to enhance treatment effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of this approach, aiming to improve recanalization success and neurological outcomes while reducing complications in rCVST patients. METHODS: A search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted across Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify studies on the use of stent retrievers and catheter aspiration for rCVST. Pooled analysis with 95 % confidence intervals was used to assess the effects. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used. Complete recanalization. good clinical outcomes (mRS ≤ 2), hemorrhagic, neurological, ischemic, and total complications, poor clinical outcomes (mRS > 2), and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of five retrospective studies involving 55 patients examined outcomes in CVST. The median mean age was 40 years. Complete recanalization rate: 36 % (95 % CI: 9 % to 62 %, I2 = 90 %). Good clinical outcomes: 72 % (95 % CI: 50 % to 94 %, I2 = 76 %). Hemorrhagic complications: 2 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 8 %, I2 = 15 %). Ischemic complications: 0 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 6 %, I2 = 0 %). Neurological complications: 7 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 14 %, I2 = 0 %). Poor clinical outcomes: 26 % (95 % CI: 6 % to 46 %, I2 = 70 %). Total complications: 6 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 15 %, I2 = 10 %). Mortality rate: 5 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 13 %, I2 = 19 %). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis scrutinized the efficacy of combining Stent Retriever and Catheter Aspiration for rCVST. Findings highlighted varied outcomes, including recanalization rates, complications, and mortality. The dichotomy between good and poor outcomes underscores the necessity for personalized therapeutic decisions. While offering a comprehensive overview, the study emphasizes literature heterogeneity, suggesting a need for more rigorous and standardized research to optimize therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales , Stents , Humanos , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/terapia , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Succión/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To propose a contemporary management strategy for venous injury during anterior lumbar spinal exposure that incorporates endovascular treatment. METHODS: Vein injuries suffered by patients treated in a single practice were reviewed. A treatment algorithm based on these experiences was formulated. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2018, 914 patients received anterior access procedures for indicated lumbar interbody fusions. Of these patients, 15 (1.6%) suffered minor vascular injuries treated with manual pressure or suture repair. Four (0.4%) patients undergoing anterior lumbar spine surgery suffered major venous injuries, all of whom received the indicated spinal hardware following endovascular rescue. Primary repair was attempted in three patients before endovascular control and not at all in one. Vascular access was obtained via the bilateral femoral veins in 2 patients, unilateral femoral in one, and bilateral femoral plus right internal jugular vein in one. Stent choice included both uncovered (5, 63%) and covered stents (3, 38%). Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 2 patient's post-treatment. 1 DVT was encountered in the setting of a covered stent and 1 uncovered stent thrombosis was treated with catheter-directed lysis 4 weeks post-operatively. Ultimately, 3 patients were therapeutically anticoagulated. Mean follow-up is 13 months (range 1-36) with duplex ultrasounds available at 6 months or later in 3 of 4 patients. There is no evidence of post-thrombotic syndrome in the 2 patients that developed DVT's or in-stent stenosis in the 3 patients with available follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular techniques are important adjuncts when controlling large-volume hemorrhage associated with venous tears during anterior spinal exposure. Adequate direct compression allowing occlusion balloon inflation are key steps to reduce blood loss. Covered and uncovered stents are both appropriate choices to treat injuries. Patients must be anticoagulated post-operatively and surveilled for the sequelae of venous insufficiency. With expedient hemostasis, the indicated spinal surgery may be safely completed.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Vena Ilíaca/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Postrombótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Iliac venous stenting (IVS) for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disease is increasingly used as evidence of the safety, efficacy and durability of these interventions increases. Female gender has been implicated as a predictor of failure in arterial endovascular interventions. We hypothesize that female gender could be predictive of patency rates of iliac vein stenting. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent IVS for thrombotic or nonthrombotic venous disease at our institution from 2007 until 2019 were identified and divided into groups based on gender. Operative notes, venograms, and the electronic health record were then queried to obtain operative details, co-morbid conditions, postoperative outcomes and stent patency. Study outcome was long term patency rate. The data was analyzed using chi-square, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients (231 limbs) were identified in our retrospective analysis, with a mean age of 48.8 ± 17.3, and BMI of 31.6 ± 8.6. Of those, 119 (59.5%) patients, (131 [56.8%] limbs) were female. Comparisons between the gender groups revealed no difference in age, BMI, or preoperative comorbidities. There was no difference in type of venous disease between male (85% thrombotic, 15% nonthrombotic) and female (84% thrombotic, 16% nonthrombotic), P= 0.830. The male cohort was more likely to present with leg ulceration (17% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.002), and the female cohort was more likely to present with leg edema (98.5% vs. 93.0%, P= 0.03). The male cohort had a higher rate of caval (48% vs. 33.6%, P= 0.027) and infrainguinal stent extension. (11% vs. 6.9%, P= 0.02). Females had a higher rate of left sided stenting (80.9% vs. 66/0%, P= 0.010). There was no difference in the median stent diameter used between the cohorts. Primary patency at 5 years was significantly higher for the male cohort (94.1% vs. 74.4%, P= 0.01) On adjusted multivariable cox regression female gender was a predictor of loss of primary patency within 5 years (HR, 4.04; P= 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center retrospective analysis of IVS, male patients were found to have better primary stent patency compared to female.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Vena Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with large (28 mm to 34 mm) and wide diameter (> 35 mm) necks remains a challenge in patients who are high-risk candidates for open repair. While several case reports describe the use of a thoracic stent graft in conjunction with a traditional modular bifurcated stent graft, most patients do not have the aortic length to accommodate such a configuration. We present our experience utilizing a distal unibody bifurcated aortic stent graft (Endologix, Irvine, CA) in conjunction with a proximal thoracic aortic stent graft (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) to treat wide-necked non-ruptured AAAs in patients who were otherwise poor candidates for open or fenestrated repair. METHODS: A single center retrospective review of patients treated with a combination of a distal unibody bifurcated aortic stent graft and a proximal thoracic aortic stent graft extension from 2013 to 2019 was performed. Demographics, perioperative details and long-term outcomes were collected and summarized. Standard statistical methods were utilized. RESULTS: We identified 7 patients who underwent this procedure during the study interval. Of these, all 7 (100%) were male with an average age of 69.1 ± 5.1 years. Average Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5.0. Average pre-operative maximum aortic and neck diameters were 57.9 mm (± 5.8) and 37.4 mm (± 4.5) respectively. All patients underwent repair with a distal 28 mm diameter unibody bifurcated aortic stent graft and proximal extension with a thoracic aortic stent graft that ranged from 40 to 46 mm in diameter. Technical success was achieved in all 7 patients. There were no perioperative mortalities or aorta-related deaths. Follow up was a mean of 1.98 years with a mean survival of 4.75 years (± 0.86). One patient required an aneurysm-related intervention for a late type III endoleak. CONCLUSION: The combined use of thoracic and abdominal aortic stent grafts is a safe and effective endovascular method to treat high-risk surgical candidates with wide-necked AAAs.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Stents , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons treating patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm must make rapid treatment decisions and sometimes lack immediate access to endovascular devices meeting the anatomic specifications of the patient at hand. We hypothesized that endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rEVAR) outside manufacturer instructions-for-use (IFU) guidelines would have similar in-hospital mortality compared to patients treated on-IFU or with an infrarenal clamp during open repair (ruptured open aortic aneurysm repair [rOAR]). METHODS: Vascular Quality Initiative datasets for endovascular and open aortic repair were queried for patients presenting with ruptured infrarenal AAA between 2013-2018. Graft-specific IFU criteria were correlated with case-specific proximal neck dimension data to classify rEVAR cases as on- or off-IFU. Univariate comparisons between the on- and off-IFU groups were performed for demographic, operative and in-hospital outcome variables. To investigate mortality differences between rEVAR and rOAR approaches, coarsened exact matching was used to match patients receiving off-IFU rEVAR with those receiving complex rEVAR (requiring at least one visceral stent or scallop) or rOAR with infrarenal, suprarenal or supraceliac clamps. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 621 patients were treated with rEVAR, with 65% classified as on-IFU and 35% off-IFU. The off-IFU group was more frequently female (25% vs. 18%, Pâ¯=â¯0.05) and had larger aneurysms (76 vs. 72 mm, P= 0.01) but otherwise was not statistically different from the on-IFU cohort. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients treated off-IFU vs. on-IFU (22% vs. 14%, P= 0.02). Off-IFU rEVAR was associated with longer operative times (135 min vs. 120 min, P= 0.004) and increased intraoperative blood product utilization (2 units vs. 1 unit, P= 0.002). When off-IFU patients were matched to complex rEVAR and rOAR patients, no baseline differences were found between the groups. Overall in-hospital complications associated with off-IFU were reduced compared to more complex strategies (43% vs. 60-81%, P< 0.001) and in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for off-IFU rEVAR patients compared to the supraceliac clamp group (18% vs. 38%, P= 0.006). However, there was no significantly increased mortality associated with complex rEVAR, infrarenal rOAR or suprarenal rOAR compared to off-IFU rEVAR (all P> 0.05). This finding persisted in a multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Off-IFU rEVAR yields inferior in-hospital survival compared to on-IFU rEVAR but remains associated with reduced in-hospital complications when compared with more complex repair strategies. When compared with matched patients undergoing rOAR with an infrarenal or suprarenal clamp, survival was no different from off-IFU rEVAR. Taken together with the growing available evidence suggesting reduced long-term durability of off-IFU EVAR, these data suggest that a patient's comorbidity burden should be key in making the decision to pursue off-IFU rEVAR over a more complex repair when proximal neck violations are anticipated preoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Etiquetado de Productos , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are the most common procedures to treat patients with symptomatic, and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. Poor preoperative functional status (FS) is increasingly being recognized as predictor for postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative functional status on the outcomes of patients who undergo CEA or CAS. METHODS: Data was obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from the years 2011-2018. All patients in the database who underwent CEA or CAS during this time period were identified. Patients were then further divided into 2 subgroups: FS-Independent and FS-dependent. Bivariate and multivariate analyses was performed for pre, intra and post-operative variables with functional status. Outcomes for treatment of symptomatic carotid disease were compared to those with asymptomatic disease among the cohort of functionally dependent patients. RESULTS: A total of 27,163 patients (61.2% Males, 38.8% Females) underwent CEA (n = 26,043) or CAS (n = 1,120) from 2011-2018. Overall, primary outcomes were as follows: mortality 0.77% (n = 210) and stroke 1.87% (n = 507).Risk adjusted multivariate analysis showed that FS-D patients undergoing CEA had higher mortality (AOR 3.06, CI 1.90-4.92, P < 0.001), longer operative times (AOR 1.36, CI 1.17-1.58, P< 0.001) higher incidence of unplanned reoperation (AOR 1.68, CI 1.19-2.37, P = 0.003), postoperative pneumonia (AOR 5.43, CI 1.62 - 18.11, P = 0.006) and ≥3 day LOS (AOR 3.05, CI 2.62-3.56, P < 0.001) as compared to FS-I patients. FS-D patients undergoing CAS had higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia (AOR 20.81, CI 1.66-261.54, P = 0.019) and higher incidence of LOS ≥3 days (AOR 2.18, CI 1.21-3.93, P < .01) as compared to FS-I patients. Survival analysis showed that the best 30-day survival was observed in FS-I patients undergoing CEA, followed by FS-I patients undergoing CAS, followed by FS-D patients undergoing CEA, followed by FS-D patients undergoing CAS. FS-D status increased mortality after CEA by 2.11%. When the outcomes of CAS and CEA were compared to each other for the cohort of FS-D patients, CAS was associated with higher incidence of stroke (AOR 3.46, CI 0.32-1.97, P= 0.046), shorter operative times (AOR 0.25, CI 0.12-0.52, P < 0.001) and higher incidence of pneumonia (AOR 11.29, CI 1.32-96.74, P = 0.027). Symptomatic patients undergoing CEA had higher LOS as compared to symptomatic patients undergoing CAS, and asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA or CAS. CONCLUSIONS: FS-D patients, undergoing CEA have higher mortality as compared to FS-I patients undergoing CAS. FS-D patients undergoing CAS have higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia and longer LOS as compared to FS-I patients. For the cohort of FS-D patients undergoing either CEA or CAS, CAS was associated with higher risk of stroke and reduced operative times. Risk benefit ratio for any carotid intervention should be carefully assessed before offering it to FS-D patients. Preoperative Dependent Functional Status Is Associated with Poor Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting in Both Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Estado Funcional , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite considerable morbid-mortality rates, common femoral endarterectomy is still considered the gold standard for atherosclerotic common femoral artery (CFA) disease. The aim of this study was to demonstrate computed tomography angiography based long-term patency after CFA stent placement and to analyze associated risk factors for restenosis. METHODS: A retrospective and observational study was carried out in consecutive patients treated with endovascular stent placement in CFA lesions. A clinical follow-up and imaging study was performed using MD-CTA to assess different degrees of in stent restenosis (ISR) and primary, assisted, and secondary patency rates. RESULTS: In a 5-year period, 35 extremities were treated in 33 patients with self-expandable nitinol stents. The technical success was 100% without complications related to the procedure. The mean follow-up (FU) was 32.2 months, and 8 limbs were lost. The degree of CFA stenosis was reduced from 79.69 ± 26.47% to 11.23 ± 24.53%. ISR < 20%, 20-70%, and ≥ 70% was evident in 15 (55.6%), 9 (33.3%), and 3 (11.1%) limbs, respectively. Estimated primary, assisted, and secondary patency was 79.5, 96.3, and 96.3%, respectively, after 24 months and 79.5, 96.3, and 96.3%, respectively after 60 months, with a freedom of clinical driven target lesion revascularisation rate of 87.8%. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment with self-expandable nitinol stents in CFA lesions had a high technical success rate and was related to few complications. A mild form of intimal hyperplasia was observed in a considerable number of cases. However, long-term patency was high; therefore, CFA stent placement might be a suitable therapeutic alternative in selected patients.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aleaciones , Constricción Patológica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Association of abdominal aortic aneurysm with congenital pelvic kidney is rare and association with isolated iliac artery aneurysm is not yet described in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of successful repair of an isolated common iliac artery aneurysm associated with a congenital pelvic kidney treated by an endovascular technique. A 75-year-old man was referred for the treatment of an asymptomatic left common iliac artery aneurysm. A computed tomography angiography revealed an isolated left common iliac artery aneurysm and a left pelvic kidney. The maximum diameter of the aneurysm was 32 mm. The congenital pelvic kidney was supplied by three small superior polar arteries that emerged from the proximal non-aneurysmal portion of the common iliac artery and the main artery that arose from the left internal iliac artery. The aneurysm exclusion was accomplished by using an iliac branch device (Gore Excluder Iliac Branch, Flagstaff, AZ). The 1 and 6 months computed tomography angiography after the procedure demonstrated complete exclusion of the aneurysm and preservation of all renal arteries. CONCLUSION: Treating patients with an association of iliac artery aneurysms and pelvic kidneys can be a challenge due the variable arterial anatomy. The use of iliac branch device is a safe and effective alternative in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Enfermedades Renales/congénito , Pelvis Renal/anomalías , Anciano , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Ilíaco/etiología , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This technical note aims to show a challenging endovascular treatment approach of a giant and tortuous ruptured popliteal artery aneurism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 86-year-old male patient was admitted for acute lower right limb ischemia. Angio-MSCT showed highly calcified superficial femoral artery, with a 180° bend in distal portion, followed by a large popliteal aneurism (63 × 61 mm) with a large extent hematoma (142 × 112 × 104 mm). Endovascular approach was chosen due to high morbidity. RESULTS: Anterior puncture of right superficial femoral artery was performed under ultrasound guidance. Despite various intents, the 0.035 hydrophilic coated wire could not be crossed distally through the aneurism. Retrograde access was performed via tibio-peroneal trunk under fluoroscopic guidance with a micropuncture set. A stiff 0.035â³ Glidewire® was successfully advanced into the proximal portion of the aneurism through a 5F vertebral catheter externalized with a snare from the femoral sheath obtaining a "through-and-through wire" technique. Tightening of both ends of the wire helped gain support and straightened curves. Two stent grafts were implanted with no residual leak at 1 month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Anterograde and retrograde approach was useful to perform a through-and-through wire technique in a challenging case of a tortuous ruptured popliteal artery aneurism.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto/terapia , Cateterismo Periférico , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Poplítea , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study sought to define duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria predicting ≥70% stenosis in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stents by correlating in-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV) with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) measurements of percent stenosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 109 patients undergoing SMA stenting between 2003 and 2018 was conducted at a single institution. Thirty-seven surveillance duplex ultrasound studies were found to have a CTA performed within 30 days of study completion. Bare metal (nâ¯=â¯20) and covered stents (nâ¯=â¯17) were included. Velocities were paired to in-stent restenosis (ISR) measured by mean vessel diameter reduction on SMA centerline reconstructions from CTA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was generated and logistic regression models for ≥70% ISR probability were used to define velocity criteria in the stented SMA. RESULTS: At a PSV of 300 cm/sec, the sensitivity is 100% and specificity 80% for a ≥70% in-stent SMA stenosis. At a PSV of 400 cm/sec, the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) is 63% and the specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) is 90%. A PSV of 450 cm/sec was consistent with the highest specificity (100%) and PPV (100%) but lower sensitivity (50%) and NPV (87.9%). One patient with a PSV of 441 cm/sec on surveillance DUS died from complications of acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: A PSV of 400 cm/sec on mesenteric DUS can predict ≥70% ISR with high sensitivity and should be considered as a diagnostic threshold for SMA in-stent restenosis.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Stents , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatología , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Circulación Esplácnica , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The bell-bottom technique is a widely used technique to treat aortoiliac aneurysms with preservation of the hypogastric arteries. The published data are scarce with conflicting results regarding the evolution. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients submitted to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with standard technique (S-EVAR) versus bell-bottom technique. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (<16 mm iliac limbs) and bell-bottom technique (≥16 mm iliac limbs) in a tertiary vascular center between 2010 and 2015. The end points of this study were type IB endoleak, reintervention and 30-day mortality. The follow-up protocol included CT scans within 30 days of implantation and 12 months. Duplex ultrasound was performed yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were treated with bell-bottom technique (n = 84, mean age 72.2 ± 8.9) and S-EVAR (n = 119, mean age 72.7 ± 8.4). The overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%, with no significant difference between groups. There was higher prevalence of coronary heart disease in the bell-bottom technique group compared to the S-EVAR group (41.6% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.01). One patient in the S-EVAR group (0.85%) and four patients in the bell-bottom technique (4.6%) developed type IB endoleak. The mean follow-up period was 35.2 ± 30.4 months. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, freedom from type IB endoleak in 80 months was 85.2% in the bell-bottom technique group and 98.7% in the S-EVAR group (p = 0.05). The freedom from reintervention in 80 months was 74.0% in the bell-bottom technique group and 94.1% in the S-EVAR group (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows lower freedom from type IB endoleak in the bell-bottom group compared to the standard repair group. There is no significant difference in reoperation rate and 30-day mortality.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Endofuga/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aneurysm sac remodeling is a complex multifactorial process with unknown factors influencing sac regression after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). We sought to identify factors associated with this process by analyzing data obtained from patients treated with the GORE EXCLUDER endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) endoprosthesis from December 2010 to October 2016 enrolled in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT). METHODS: All patients enrolled in GREAT with three years CT angiography (CTA) follow-up in each of the three successive years after EVAR were included. The percentage of sac size reduction toward device diameter was calculated and used as a surrogate for sac regression with the formula used being: sac size reduction = ((AAA baseline diameter - AAA diameter at follow-up)/(AAA baseline diameter - device diameter))∗100. The cohort was divided into two groups in accordance with the percentage of aneurysm sac reduction at three years; one with the top quartile of patients and the other with the lowest three quartiles. Demographic and procedural variables were analyzed using univariate and regression modeling to determine factors predictive of sac regression. RESULTS: There were 3265 subjects enrolled with follow-up as of May 2018 of which 526 (16.2%) had three years of CTA surveillance. Overall aneurysm sac size decreased from a mean of 58.0 mm (Std Dev: 10.4, range: 34.2, 100.0) to a mean of 49.3 mm (Std Dev: 14.1, range: 0, 140) for a percentage reduction toward device diameter of a mean 28.2% (Std Dev: 39.0, range: -103.7, 183.9). On multivariate logistic regression model; two factors proved to be statistically significant contributors to a larger percentage reduction in aneurysm sac: a conical neck (odds ratio [OR] = 1.64, P-value = 0.023) and a larger proximal device diameter (OR = 1.09, P-value = 0.023). On the other hand, two factors were negative predictors of sac shrinkage, namely: old age (OR = 0.96, P-value = 0.002) and larger baseline aneurysm sac diameter (OR = 0.98, P-value = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms with conical necks and larger proximal device neck diameters have an increased percentage change in sac size over time after EVAR. Older age and larger initial diameters of aneurysms were negatively associated with percentage change in sac size as well as sac regression. Further study is needed to determine the clinical utility of these observations and applicability across multiple endoprosthesis platforms.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Remodelación Vascular , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Aortografía , Australia , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Brasil , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR) is a complex procedure that generates high radiation doses. Magnification aids in vessel cannulation but increases radiation. The aim of the study was to compare radiation doses to patients and operating room staff from two fluoroscopy techniques, standard magnification vs dual fluoroscopy with live-image digital zooming during F/B-EVAR. METHODS: An observational, prospective, single-center study of F/B-EVAR procedures using Philips Allura XperFD20 equipment (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was performed during a 42-month period. Intravascular ultrasound, three-dimensional fusion, and extreme collimation were used in all procedures. Intraoperative live-image processing was performed with two imaging systems: standard magnification in 123 patients (81%) and dual fluoroscopy with live-image digital zooming in 28 patients (18%). In the latter, the live "processed" zoomed images are displayed on examination displays and live images are displayed on reference displays. The reference air kerma was collected for each case and represents patient dose. Operating staff personal dosimetry was collected using the DoseAware system (Philips Healthcare). Patient and staff radiation doses were compared using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Mean age was 71.6 ± 11.4 years. The median body mass index was 27 kg/m2 (interquartile range [IQR], 24.4-30.6 kg/m2) and was the same for both groups. Procedures performed with dual fluoroscopy with digital zooming demonstrated significantly lower median patient (1382 mGy [IQR, 999-2045 mGy] vs 2458 mGy [IQR, 1706-3767 mGy]; P < .01) and primary operator radiation doses (101 µSv [IQR, 34-235 µSv] vs 266 µSv [IQR, 104-583 µSv]; P < .01) compared with standard magnification. Similar significantly reduced radiation doses were recorded for first assistant, scrub nurse, and anesthesia staff in procedures performed with dual fluoroscopy. According to device design, procedures performed with four-fenestration/branch devices generated higher operator radiation doses (262 µSv [IQR, 116.5-572 µSv] vs 171 µSv [IQR, 44-325 µSv]; P < .01) compared with procedures with three or fewer fenestration/branches. Among the most complex design (four-vessel), operator radiation dose was significantly lower with digital zooming compared with standard magnification (128.5 µSv [IQR, 70.5-296 µSv] vs 309 µSv [IQR, 150-611 µSv]; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Current radiation doses to patients and operating personnel are within acceptable limits; however, dual fluoroscopy with live-image digital zooming results in dramatically lower radiation doses compared with the standard image processing with dose-dependent magnification. Operator radiation doses were reduced in half during procedures performed with more complex device designs when digital zooming was used.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Magnificación Radiográfica , Radiografía Intervencional , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Magnificación Radiográfica/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Outflow venous stenting as an adjunct to catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is performed to prevent recurrent thrombosis and to reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. Historical data show that stenting improves outcomes of surgical thrombectomy in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and recent observational data suggest that stenting improves long-term outcomes of CDT. However, the impact of stenting during CDT on acute safety outcomes is unknown. We sought to investigate the contemporary trends, safety outcomes, and resource utilization of adjunctive stent placement in patients undergoing CDT. METHODS: Patients with proximal lower extremity and caval DVT were identified within the National Inpatient Sample from January 2005 to December 2013. From this data set, we stratified our patients into three groups: patients who received CDT alone, patients who received CDT plus angioplasty, and patients who received CDT plus angioplasty with stenting. We used an inverse probability treatment weighting algorithm to create three weighted cohorts. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate the trends of stent placement among patients treated with CDT. The primary outcome was a composite end point of all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleed, or intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 138,049 patients were discharged with a principal diagnosis of proximal and caval DVT; 7097 of these patients received CDT (5.1%). From this group, 2854 (40.2%) were treated with CDT alone, 2311 (32.6%) received adjunctive angioplasty alone, and 1932 (27.2%) received adjunctive angioplasty and stent. Adjunctive stenting had a significantly lower rate of primary composite outcome compared with CDT alone (2.7% vs 3.8%; P = .04). Stent placement was associated with a similar length of stay compared with angioplasty and CDT alone groups (6.8 vs 6.9 vs 7.1 days, respectively; P = .94) and higher in-hospital charges ($115,164.01 ± $76,985.31 vs $98,089.82 ± $72,921.94 vs $80,441.63 ± $74,024.98; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study suggests that one in four patients undergoing CDT is treated with adjunctive stent placement in the United States. This observational study showed that adjunctive stenting does not adversely affect the acute safety outcomes of CDT; however, it was associated with increased hospital charges.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents/tendencias , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/mortalidadRESUMEN
The carotid-esophageal fistula is a rare and serious complication of the metallic esophageal prosthesis. A high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and treatment, decreasing the morbidity and mortality rate of this severe complication. We report a case of a 4-year-old boy presenting severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a carotid-esophageal fistula, secondary to deployment of an esophageal metallic prosthesis for treatment of a recurrent stenosis. The carotid pseudo-aneurism was successfully treated with stents and coils. Although endovascular treatment is a safe and effective option, arterial stenting in children needs further studies with long-term follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Arterias Carótidas , Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fístula Esofágica/terapia , Estenosis Esofágica/terapia , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Stents , Fístula Vascular/terapia , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Preescolar , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Fístula Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Esofágica/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fístula Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Vascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
Postendarterectomy carotid pseudoaneurysms are infrequent. The endovascular treatment is less invasive, with a minor risk of complications. However, the presence of a highly angulated aortic arch (type III) is a challenge, since the navigation of endovascular devices is not favorable. Through transcervical access, it is possible to deliver the devices directly into the carotid artery. We herein present a case of a postendarterectomy carotid pseudoaneurysm in a patient with type III aortic arch that was successfully treated with transcervical endograft exclusion.