RESUMEN

The use of skin barrier-enhancing topical medication is a favorable approach for the treatment of occupational hand dermatitis (OHD). Cocos nucifera or coconut oil is one of the best sources of lipid enriched with laurate acid, and glycerin is a well-known humectant that improves skin hydration. This study is aimed is to evaluate the effectiveness of C. nucifera and glycerin for secondary prevention of OHD among batik (Indonesian traditional fabric) workers. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, the effect of glycerine-C. nucifera cream versus glycerin-only was considered with multiple afterwork applications of moisturizer over a 2-week period on batik workers with OHD. Assessment of trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), skin capacitance, and a clinical assessment using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) were carried out at day 0 and 14. The results show thirty-two batik dyeing and/or rinsing workers were enrolled in the study with mild to moderate OHD. Clinical improvement was demonstrated by 20% decrease in HECSI and TEWL, and 20% increase in skin capacitance. Both moisturizers were equally effective for the secondary prevention of OHD. As a conclusion, glycerine-C. nucifera and glycerin-only cream are equally effective for secondary prevention for OHD among batik worker to reduce the prevalence of hand dermatitis.

Asunto(s)

Cocos , Estudios Cruzados , Emolientes , Glicerol , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Cocos/química , Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Emolientes/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Dermatosis de la Mano/tratamiento farmacológico , Crema para la Piel/administración & dosificación , Crema para la Piel/uso terapéutico , Prevención Secundaria/métodos

RESUMEN

Guidelines help to facilitate treatment decisions based on available evidence, and also to provide recommendations in areas of uncertainty. In this paper, we compare the recommendations for stroke workup and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack of the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association (ASA) with the European Stroke Organization (ESO) guidelines. The primary aim of this paper is to offer clinicians guidance by identifying areas where there is consensus and where consensus is lacking, in the absence or presence of high-level evidence. We compared AHA/ASA with the ESO guideline recommendations for 7 different topics related to diagnostic stroke workup and secondary prevention. We categorized the recommendations based on class and level of evidence to determine whether there were relevant differences in the ratings of evidence that the guidelines used for its recommendations. Finally, we summarized major topics of agreement and disagreement, while also prominent knowledge gaps were identified. In total, we found 63 ESO and 82 AHA/ASA recommendations, of which 38 were on the same subject. Most recommendations are largely similar, but not all are based on high-level evidence. For many recommendations, AHA/ASA and ESO assigned different levels of evidence. For the 10 recommendations with Level A evidence (high quality) in AHA/ASA, ESO only labeled 4 of these as high quality. There are many remaining issues with either no or insufficient evidence, and some topics that are not covered by both guidelines. Most ESO and AHA/ASA Guideline recommendations for stroke workup and secondary prevention were similar. However not all were based on high-level evidence and the appointed level of evidence often differed. Clinicians should not blindly follow all guideline recommendations; the accompanying level of evidence informs which recommendations are based on robust evidence. Topics with lower levels of evidence, or those with recommendations that disagree or are missing, may be an incentive for further clinical research.

Asunto(s)

Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/normas , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Europa (Continente) , Estados Unidos , American Heart Association , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico

RESUMEN

Background: Evidence-based International clinical practice guidelines, universally recommend secondary prevention medications for those with previous cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is limited data on the community use of these medications in the Middle East (ME). Objectives: This study assesses the use and predictors of evidence based secondary prevention medications in individuals with a history of CVD [coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke]. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, we enrolled 11,228 individuals aged between 35-70 years from 52 urban and 35 rural communities from four ME countries, United Arab Emirates (n = 1499), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (n = 2046), Occupied Palestinian Territory (n = 1668) and Islamic Republic of Iran (n = 6013). With standardized questionnaires, we report estimates of medication use in those with CVD at national level and the independent predictors of their utilization through a multivariable analysis model. Results: Of the total ME cohort, 614 (5.5%) had CVD, of which 115 (1.0%) had stroke, 523 (4.7%) had CHD and 24 (0.2%) had both. The mean age of those with CVD was 56.6 ± 8.8 years and 269 (43.8%) were female. Overall, only 23.5% of those with CVD reported using three or more proven secondary prevention medications, and a substantial proportion (stroke 27.8%, CHD 25.8%) did not take any of these medications. In a fully adjusted analysis, increasing age, female gender, higher education, higher wealth in individual household, residence in a higher income country as well as being obese, hypertensive or diabetic were independent predictors of medication use. Conclusion: The use of secondary prevention medication is low in ME and has not reached the modest recommended WHO target of 50% use of 3 or more medications. Independent factors of higher use were, better socioeconomic status (household wealth, country wealth and education) and better contact and accessibility to health care (increasing age, female gender, obesity, diabetes and hypertension).

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have represented an important change in the management of hypercholesterolemia, although, until now, they have barely been used. Without PCSK9i, many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) or those at very high risk do not reach their therapeutic LDLc objectives. OBJECTIVE: The analysis aimed to examine the clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects receiving PCSK9i treatment in the Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society. METHODS: All consecutive subjects aged ≥ 18 years from different Lipid Units included in the Dyslipidemia Registry of the SEA were analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of unrelated patients aged ≥ 18 at the time of inclusion with hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL after the exclusion of secondary causes) who were studied for at least two years after inclusion. Participants' baseline and final visit clinical and biochemical characteristics were analyzed based on whether they were on primary or secondary prevention and whether they were taking PCSK9i at the end of follow-up. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-nine patients were analyzed, 7014 patients in primary prevention and 1281 in secondary prevention at baseline. 4127 subjects completed the required follow-up for the final analysis. The median follow-up duration was 7 years (IQR 3.0-10.0). Five hundred patients (12.1%) were taking PCSK9i at the end of the follow-up. The percentage of PCSK9i use reached 35.6% (n = 201) and 8.7% (n = 318) in subjects with and without CVD, respectively. Subjects on PCSK9i and oral lipid-lowering agents with and without CVD achieved LDLc reductions of 80.3% and 75.1%, respectively, concerning concentrations without lipid-lowering drugs. Factors associated with PCSK9i use included increasing age, LDLc without lipid-lowering drugs and the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score. However, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and LDLc after oral lipid-lowering drugs were not independent factors associated with PCSK9i prescription. In subjects with CVD, the use of PCSK9i was higher in men than in women (an odds ratio of 1.613, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of CVD patients received PCSK9i at the end of follow-up. The use of PCSK9i was more focused on baseline LDLc concentrations rather than on CVD risk. Women received less PCSK9i in secondary prevention compared to men.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , LDL-Colesterol , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Inhibidores de PCSK9/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipercolesterolemia/sangre , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Proproteína Convertasa 9/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

Background: Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women, many of whom have surgery for persistent pain. Recurrence of symptoms following an operation is common. Although hormonal treatment can reduce this risk, there is uncertainty about the best option. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogen therapy compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain and quality of life. Design: A multicentre, open, randomised trial with parallel economic evaluation. The final design was informed by a pilot study, qualitative exploration of women's lived experience of endometriosis and a pretrial economic model. Setting: Thirty-four United Kingdom hospitals. Participants: Women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis. Interventions: Long-acting progestogen reversible contraceptive (either 150 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) or combined oral contraceptive pill (30 µg ethinylestradiol, 150 µg levonorgestrel). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire at 36 months post randomisation. The economic evaluation estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained. Results: Four hundred and five women were randomised to receive either long-acting reversible contraceptive (N = 205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (N = 200). Pain scores improved in both groups (24 and 23 points on average) compared with preoperative values but there was no difference between the two (adjusted mean difference: -0.8, 95% confidence interval -5.7 to 4.2; p = 0.76). The long-acting reversible contraceptive group underwent fewer surgical procedures or second-line treatments compared with the combined oral contraceptive group (73 vs. 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00). The mean adjusted quality-adjusted life-year difference between two arms was 0.043 (95% confidence interval -0.069 to 0.152) in favour of the combined oral contraceptive pill, although this cost an additional £533 (95% confidence interval 52 to 983) per woman. Limitations: Limitations include the absence of a no-treatment group and the fact that many women changed treatments over the 3 years of follow-up. Use of telephone follow-up to collect primary outcome data in those who failed to return questionnaires resulted in missing data for secondary outcomes. The COVID pandemic may have affected rates of further surgical treatment. Conclusions: At 36 months, women allocated to either intervention had comparable levels of pain, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement from presurgical levels. Although the combined oral contraceptive was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the difference between the two was marginal and lower rates of repeat surgery might make long-acting reversible contraceptives preferable to some women. Future work: Future research needs to focus on evaluating newer hormonal preparations, a more holistic approach to symptom suppression and identification of biomarkers to diagnose endometriosis and its recurrence. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN97865475. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97865475. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 11/114/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 55. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. The NIHR recognises that people have diverse gender identities, and in this report, the word 'woman' is used to describe patients or individuals whose sex assigned at birth was female, whether they identify as female, male or non-binary.

---

Endometriosis is a condition where cells similar to ones that line the womb are found elsewhere in the body. Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women, many of whom have surgery for persistent pain. Unfortunately, symptoms often return and some women will need repeat operations. Hormonal contraceptives can prevent the return of endometriosis-related pain: either long-acting reversible contraceptives (injections or a coil, fitted inside the womb) or the combined oral contraceptive pill (often called 'the pill'). We do not know which is the best option. The aim of this trial was to find out which of these two hormone treatments was more effective in terms of symptom relief, avoidance of further surgery and costs. Four hundred and five women with endometriosis, who were not intending to get pregnant, participated in a clinical trial. Half of the participants took long-acting reversible contraceptives, and the other half took the pill for 3 years following endometriosis surgery. The choice of treatment was made at random by a computer to ensure a fair comparison, although those allocated to the long-acting contraceptive could choose between injections or the coil. Participants completed questionnaires about their symptoms and life quality at intervals up to 3 years. Both treatments were equally good at reducing pain but more women using the pill had repeat operations. The pill was a little more costly overall but associated with a slightly higher quality of life. Both treatments are equally effective in reducing pain up to 3 years after surgery for endometriosis. The differences in costs are small and the choice of treatment should be based on personal preference.

Asunto(s)

Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Endometriosis , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Adulto , Reino Unido , Levonorgestrel/uso terapéutico , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Prevención Secundaria , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Progestinas/economía , Progestinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/prevención & control

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) is the standard treatment for intrauterine adhesion (IUA). Previous studies have shown that postoperative oral estrogen or an intrauterine physical barrier could reduce the recurrence of IUA by promoting the proliferation of the endometrium or inhibiting the reformation of adhesions. Our team designed an intrauterine stent that can release estrogen within the uterine cavity slowly. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the estrogen-releasing intrauterine system in preventing the recurrence of moderate to severe IUA. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective randomized controlled 2-arm parallel trial that included patients who were diagnosed with moderate to severe IUA and who received TCRA. A total of 250 patients were randomly assigned, at a 1:1 ratio, to receive the intrauterine estrogen-releasing system or a Foley catheter balloon combined with oral estrogen therapy after surgery. The primary outcome was the rate of adhesion reduction in the two groups. The secondary outcomes included endometrial thickness at the ovulation period, menstrual improvement rates, and other reported adverse events during follow-up. RESULTS: The average daily drug release amount for all the tested stents was 0.21 mg/day. At 60 days postoperatively, the rate of adhesion reduction was significantly greater in the experimental group than in the control group (93.33% vs. 58.56%, p < 0.001). The endometrium of the experimental group was thicker than that of the control group (p < 0.001). Consistently, the rate of improvement in menstruation was greater in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.010). No grade 3-4 adverse events were found in the two groups during the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In the cohort of patients with moderate to severe IUA, the intrauterine estrogen-releasing system was more effective at reducing adhesion than traditional oral estrogen combined with an intrauterine Foley catheter after TCRA. This novel intrauterine system provides a new option for the management of IUA after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number is NCT04972032. Date of registration: August 15, 2021.

Asunto(s)

Estrógenos , Humanos , Femenino , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Uterinas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Recurrencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control

Asunto(s)

Foramen Oval Permeable , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Recurrencia , Prevención Secundaria , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Foramen Oval Permeable/cirugía , Foramen Oval Permeable/terapia , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos

RESUMEN

Secondary prevention of skin cancer consists in early detection of malignant lesions through patients' mole self-examination and medical examination. The objective of this study was to assess the self-reported  frequency of mole examination in a large, representative sample of the adult general population of 17 countries from all continents. Of a total of 17,001 participants, 4.8% had their moles checked by a dermatologist more than once a year, 11.3% once a year, 8.4% every 2-3 years, 12.4% once in a while, 10.3% once in lifetime, and 52.6% of participants had never performed a mole examination. Egypt was the country with the highest prevalence of people who performed a moles check more than once a year (15.9%), followed by Brazil and the USA. A higher frequency of mole checks was associated with sex (man vs woman), higher education, higher income, fair phototype, history of skin cancer, medical insurance, and sun-protective behaviours. Despite recommendations by health providers, it appears that the frequency of mole checks in the general population is still low. It is necessary for dermatologists to keep informing at-risk populations about the importance of moles check, with particular care regarding categories that less frequently adhere to secondary prevention measures.

Asunto(s)

Dermatólogos , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoexamen , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Nevo/epidemiología , Nevo/diagnóstico , Prevención Secundaria , Salud Global , Adolescente , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes exhibit a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality compared to healthy individuals. Following a transient ischemic attack (TIA) the risk of stroke and death increase further. Physical activity engagement after a TIA is an effective way of secondary prevention. However, there's a lack of research on how individuals with diabetes modify physical activity levels and how these adjustments impact survival post-TIA. This study aimed to determine the extent to which individuals with diabetes alter their physical activity levels following a TIA and to assess the impact of these changes on mortality. METHODS: This was a nationwide longitudinal study, employing data from national registers in Sweden spanning from 01/01/2003 to 31/12/2019. Data were collected 2 years retro- and prospectively of TIA occurrence, in individuals with diabetes. Individuals were grouped based on decreasing, remaining, or increasing physical activity levels after the TIA. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluate the adjusted relationship between change in physical activity and all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 4.219 individuals (mean age 72.9 years, 59.4% males). Among them, 35.8% decreased, 37.5% kept steady, and 26.8% increased their physical activity after the TIA. A subsequent stroke occurred in 6.7%, 6.4%, and 6.1% of individuals, while death occurred in 6.3%, 7.3%, and 3.7% of individuals, respectively. In adjusted analyses, participants who increased their physical activity had a 45% lower risk for all-cause mortality and a 68% lower risk for cardiovascular mortality, compared to those who decreased their physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Positive change in physical activity following a ΤΙΑ was associated with a reduced risk of mortality. Increased engagement in physical activity should be promoted after TIA, thereby actively supporting individuals with diabetes in achieving improved health outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Diabetes Mellitus , Ejercicio Físico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Sistema de Registros , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Suecia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores Protectores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Causas de Muerte , Recurrencia

RESUMEN

This article examines the care gaps in lipid-lowering therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), primarily focusing on discrepancies between recommended practices and actual clinical implementation. It provides an overview of the different challenges in lipid management following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Studies reveal gaps in lipid testing and treatment adequacy post-PCI and ACS, as well as knowledge and practice gaps among primary care practitioners, particularly in adhering to the latest lipid guidelines. Initiatives such as the Guidelines Oriented Approach to Lipid-Lowering (GOAL) Canada program and the North American ACS Reflective III Pilot demonstrate improvements in the uptake of nonstatin therapies and achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets through targeted educational and feedback interventions. Nonetheless, systemic challenges in the drug approval and reimbursement process persist and affect the accessibility of newer lipid-lowering agents. The most notable contribution of the reviewed studies is the demonstration of improved lipid management outcomes in high-risk ASCVD populations through targeted educational interventions, highlighting their potential value to change clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

Hipolipemiantes , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Canadá/epidemiología , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional , Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos

Asunto(s)

Lista de Verificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control

RESUMEN

AIMS: The Nagasaki Acute Myocardial Infarction Secondary Prevention Clinical Pathway (NASP), a guideline-based regional clinical pathway, was developed to manage low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Nagasaki prefecture in Japan. This study aimed to summarize the perceived best practices and barriers for the dissemination and operation of the NASP. METHODS: This exploratory sequential mixed methods study was developed around the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Focus group interviews were conducted with 24 physicians with experience treating AMI in alignment with the NASP at foundation hospitals. The identified themes and insights were integrated into the development of the questionnaire. The web-based, self-administered questionnaire with a cross-sectional study design was given to 62 physicians in the Nagasaki prefecture. Mixed-method data integration of the results from both study phases was conducted through meta-inferences made from the qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS: The best practices included the development of multi-disciplinary operation teams at medical facilities in preparation for the implementation of the NASP, the simplification of the document preparation process, and the establishment of an additional medical fees policy for the utilization of the NASP instead of patient referral documents. Practices tailored to the type of medical institute such as instructing patients on the NASP regimen during index hospitalization for acute-care hospitals, and the development of NASP instructions and manuals for primary care hospitals/outpatient clinics were also recommended. In addition, barriers to the implementation of the NASP such as missed eligible AMI patients for the NASP and the inconsistent implementation to eligible AMI patients were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the perceived best practices and barriers for the NASP. This knowledge should be considered when expanding the NASP to other institutions across Japan.

Asunto(s)

Vías Clínicas , Grupos Focales , Infarto del Miocardio , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Japón , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Statins are widely prescribed for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prevention; however, a significant proportion of users discontinue the medication for various reasons. This review aimed to determine the prevalence of statin therapy discontinuation, its associated factors, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the first year of discontinuation. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from their inception to December 2022. Manual searches were also conducted on the bibliographies of relevant articles. Studies were included for qualitative data synthesis and assessed for methodological quality. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies, predominantly cohort studies (n = 38), involving 4 277 061 participants were included. The prevalence of statin discontinuation within the first year of statin initiation ranged from 0.8% to 70.5%, which was higher for primary prevention indications. Factors frequently associated with an increased likelihood of statin discontinuation included male sex, nonWhite ethnicity, smoking status, and being uninsured. Conversely, discontinuation was less likely in patients with CVD who received secondary prevention statin therapy and in patients with polypharmacy. Furthermore, age showed diverse and inconsistent relationships with statin discontinuation among various age categories. Five studies that reported the cardiovascular risk of statin discontinuation within the first year of initiation showed significantly increased risk of discontinuation, including all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.36-3.65). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a high prevalence of statin discontinuation and an increased likelihood of adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the first year of discontinuation, despite wide variability across published studies. This review highlights the importance of addressing the modifiable risk factors associated with statin discontinuation, such as smoking and lack of insurance coverage.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria/métodos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Relapse among individuals with serious mental illnesses in resource-limited contexts, including South Africa, is a significant concern. To date, the risks for relapse among this population is well documented, but little is known about prevention strategies to reduce its occurrence in these resource-limited settings. Therefore, this qualitative study explores the risk factors and strategies for relapse prevention from the patients' and caregivers' perspectives. METHODS: We conducted audio-recorded face-to-face in-depth interviews to capture the lived experience of relapse of inpatient study participants with serious mental illness (N = 24) at a public specialized psychiatry hospital in South Africa and their caregivers (N = 6). We conducted an inductive thematic analysis with two pre-specified themes (risk factors for relapse and strategies for prevention), with the codes devised from the data. RESULTS: Six sub-themes were identified from the analysis within the two pre-specified themes(Risk factors and strategies for relapse prevention): personal-related, family-related, and health system-related risk factors and strategies for preventing relapse, respectively. To highlight some essential findings, the importance of motivation for drug adherence, family involvement, and availability of anti-psychotic drugs in public health care were noted. More importantly, this study identified important cultural complexities where traditional healers play a significant role in some cultural understanding and treatment of mental illness, affecting medication adherence. CONCLUSION: This study calls for people-centered mental health care delivery in a public health system that listens to the voice of concern, including cultural challenges, and implements meaningful support that matters most to the patient and their family/caregivers.

Asunto(s)

Cuidadores , Trastornos Mentales , Investigación Cualitativa , Prevención Secundaria , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicología , Sudáfrica , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Recurrencia

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are few retrospective and prospective studies on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in chronic Chagas heart disease (CCHD). OBJECTIVES: To describe the long-term evolution of patients with CCHD and ICD and to identify and analyze predictors of mortality and appropriate device therapy in this population. METHODS: This was a historical prospective study with 117 patients with ICD and CCHD. Devices were implanted from January 2003 to December 2021. Predictors of appropriate therapies and long-term mortality were identified and analyzed. The level of statistical significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS: Patients (n = 117) had a median follow-up of 61 months (25 to 121 months); they were predominantly male (74%), with a median age of 55 years (48 to 64 years). There were 43.6% appropriate shocks, 26.5% antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and 51% appropriate therapies. During follow-up, 46 patients (39.7%) died. Mortality was 6.2% person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6 to 8.3), with 2 sudden deaths during follow-up. Secondary prevention (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.3; p = 0.029) and ejection fraction less than 30% (HR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.1; p < 0.05) were predictors of appropriate therapies. Intermediate Rassi score showed a strong association with the occurrence of ATP alone (p = 0.015). Functional class IV (p = 0.007), left ventricular ejection fraction < 30 (p = 0.010), and age above 75 years (p = 0.042) were predictors of total mortality. CONCLUSION: ICDs in CCHD showed a high incidence of appropriate activation, especially in patients with secondary prevention, low left ventricular ejection fraction, and intermediate Rassi score. Patients with congestive heart failure, elevated functional class, and age over 75 years showed elevated mortality. Survival function of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and chronic Chagas heart disease. A - According to New York Heart Association functional class; B - According to left ventricular ejection fraction; C - According to Rassi score. D - According to age. CCHD: chronic Chagas heart disease; HR: hazard ratio; ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Asunto(s)

Cardiomiopatía Chagásica , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/terapia , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/fisiopatología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crónica , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Prevención Primaria , Resultado del Tratamiento

Asunto(s)

Quelantes , Terapia por Quelación , Ácido Edético , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Quelantes/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Quelación/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Ácido Edético/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Cadmio , Plomo , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

Importance: In 2013, the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) reported that edetate disodium (EDTA)-based chelation significantly reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) events by 18% in 1708 patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI). Objective: To replicate the finding of TACT in individuals with diabetes and previous MI. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 2 × 2 factorial, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial at 88 sites in the US and Canada, involving participants who were 50 years or older, had diabetes, and had experienced an MI at least 6 weeks before recruitment compared the effect of EDTA-based chelation vs placebo infusions on CVD events and compared the effect of high doses of oral multivitamins and minerals with oral placebo. This article reports on the chelation vs placebo infusion comparisons. Interventions: Eligible participants were randomly assigned to 40 weekly infusions of an EDTA-based chelation solution or matching placebo and to twice daily oral, high-dose multivitamin and mineral supplements or matching placebo for 60 months. This article addresses the chelation study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Median follow-up was 48 months. Primary comparisons were made from patients who received at least 1 assigned infusion. Results: Of the 959 participants (median age, 67 years [IQR, 60-72 years]; 27% females; 78% White, 10% Black, and 20% Hispanic), 483 received at least 1 chelation infusion and 476 at least 1 placebo infusion. A primary end point event occurred in 172 participants (35.6%) in the chelation group and in 170 (35.7%) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.16; P = .53). The 5-year primary event cumulative incidence rates were 45.8% for the chelation group and 46.5% for the placebo group. CV death, MI, or stroke events occurred in 89 participants (18.4%) in the chelation group and in 94 (19.7%) in the placebo group (adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.66-1.19). Death from any cause occurred in 84 participants (17.4%) in the chelation group and in 84 (17.6%) in the placebo group (adjusted HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.30). Chelation reduced median blood lead levels from 9.03 µg/L at baseline to 3.46 µg/L at infusion 40 (P < .001). Corresponding levels in the placebo group were 9.3 µg/L and 8.7 µg/L, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite effectively reducing blood lead levels, EDTA chelation was not effective in reducing cardiovascular events in stable patients with coronary artery disease who have diabetes and a history of MI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02733185.

Asunto(s)

Angina Inestable , Quelantes , Terapia por Quelación , Ácido Edético , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Angina Inestable/epidemiología , Angina Inestable/prevención & control , Terapia por Quelación/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Ácido Edético/administración & dosificación , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Infusiones Intravenosas , Quelantes/administración & dosificación , Plomo , Cadmio , Prevención Secundaria/métodos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few individuals (<2%) who experience a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) participate in secondary prevention lifestyle programs. Novel approaches that leverage digital health technology may provide a viable alternative to traditional interventions that support secondary prevention in people living with stroke or TIA. To be successful, these strategies should focus on user needs and preferences and be acceptable to clinicians and people living with stroke or TIA. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to co-design, with people with lived experience of stroke or TIA (referred to as consumers) and clinicians, a multicomponent digital technology support program for secondary prevention of stroke. METHODS: A consumer user needs survey (108 items) was distributed through the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry and the Stroke Association of Victoria. An invitation to a user needs survey (135 items) for clinicians was circulated via web-based professional forums and national organizations (eg, the Stroke Telehealth Community of Practice Microsoft Teams Channel) and the authors' research networks using Twitter (subsequently rebranded X, X Corp) and LinkedIn (LinkedIn Corp). Following the surveys, 2 rounds of user experience workshops (design and usability testing workshops) were completed with representatives from each end user group (consumers and clinicians). Feedback gathered after each round informed the final design of the digital health program. RESULTS: Overall, 112 consumers (male individuals: n=63, 56.3%) and 54 clinicians (female individuals: n=43, 80%) responded to the survey; all items were completed by 75.8% (n=85) of consumers and 78% (n=42) of clinicians. Most clinicians (46/49, 94%) indicated the importance of monitoring health and lifestyle measures more frequently than current practice, particularly physical activity, weight, and sleep. Most consumers (87/96, 90%) and clinicians (41/49, 84%) agreed that providing alerts about potential deterioration in an individual's condition were important functions for a digital program. Intention to use a digital program for stroke prevention and discussing the data collected during face-to-face consultations was high (consumers: 79/99, 80%; clinicians 36/42, 86%). In addition, 7 consumers (male individuals: n=5, 71%) and 9 clinicians (female individuals: n=6, 67%) took part in the user experience workshops. Participants endorsed using a digital health program to help consumers manage stroke or TIA and discussed preferred functions and health measures in a digital solution for secondary prevention of stroke. They also noted the need for a mobile app that is easy to use. Clinician feedback highlighted the need for a customizable clinician portal that captures individual consumer goals. CONCLUSIONS: Following an iterative co-design process, supported by evidence from user needs surveys and user experience workshops, a consumer-facing app that integrates wearable activity trackers and a clinician web portal were designed and developed to support secondary prevention of stroke. Feasibility testing is currently in progress to assess acceptability and use.

Asunto(s)

Salud Digital , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Prevención Secundaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Australia , Tecnología Biomédica/métodos , Tecnología Digital , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina

Asunto(s)

Anticoagulantes , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Prevención Secundaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Recurrencia , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente

RESUMEN

Primary cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy has a high risk of vertical transmission, with severe fetal sequelae mainly associated with first-trimester infections. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 IU/kg cytomegalovirus-specific hyperimmune globulin (HIG), used in first-trimester maternal primary infections for congenital infection prevention. The primary outcome was vertical transmission, defined as neonatal viruria or positive amniocentesis if pregnancy was discontinued. HIG, initially administered monthly and since 2019 biweekly, was discontinued in negative amniocentesis cases. Women declining amniocentesis and positive amniocentesis cases with normal sonography were offered monthly HIG until delivery as a treatment strategy. The total transmission rate was 29.9% (32/107; 10 pregnancy terminations with positive amniocentesis, 18 completed pregnancies with positive amniocentesis and 4 declining amniocentesis). Maternal viremia was the only factor associated with fetal transmission (OR 4.62, 95% CI 1.55-13.74). The transmission rate was not significantly different whether HIG was started during the first or second trimester (28.2% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.58), or between monthly and biweekly subgroups (25.7% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.193). Pre-treatment maternal viremia could inform decisions as a predictor of congenital infection.

Asunto(s)

Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Adulto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Recién Nacido , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Estudios de Cohortes , Amniocentesis , Viremia , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas