RESUMEN
Antibiotics are often prescribed inappropriately, either when they are not needed or with an unnecessarily broad spectrum of activity. This is a serious problem that can lead to the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study was conducted to assess the antibiotic prescribing pattern in pediatric patients hospitalized at a quaternary hospital in Nampula, Mozambique, using the WHO indicators and Framework as a reference. A retrospective study was conducted using secondary data obtained from medical records. The study population consisted of children aged 0-10 years who were hospitalized in a quaternary-level hospital ward in Nampula, Mozambique. The pattern of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed using indicators and the WHO classification of antibiotics into AWaRe categories. Descriptive statistics were applied. A total of 464 antibiotics were prescribed during the study. The age groups of 1-3 years and 28 days-12 months were prescribed more antibiotics. The most common antibiotics were ceftriaxone and crystallized penicillin, which were frequently prescribed for patients suffering from bronchopneumonia, gastroenteritis, and malaria. 74.8% of the antibiotics prescribed belonged to the Access group, while 23.7% belonged to the Watch group. There were no prescriptions of antibiotics from the Reserve group. The average number of antibiotics per prescription was 1.51 (SD ± 0.725). The percentage of antibiotic prescribing was 97.5%, with 96.20% by injection. All antibiotics prescribed were on the essential medicines list and prescribed by generic name. These results are concerning and highlight the urgency of strengthening antimicrobial optimization measures, as well as implementing the AWaRe framework in antibiotic prescribing as an essential strategy to combat AMR.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Mozambique , Lactante , Preescolar , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Antidepressants are the third most prescribed drug class, and most prescriptions are not performed by specialists. This study aimed to evaluate primary health care (PHC) physicians' self-perceived confidence in prescribing antidepressants. This is a cross-sectional study with PHC physicians in the municipality of Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil. Psychiatrists or psychiatry residents were excluded. The self-assessment of confidence and the collection of participants' characteristics was carried out by an online questionnaire. Categorical variables were presented in absolute and relative frequencies. Continuous variables were described as means or medians according to their normality distribution. Of 447 physicians, the sample consisted of 55 participants. Their mean age was 37.2 ± 12.8 years. Most physicians (75%) claimed confidence in prescribing antidepressants. Self-perceived confidence remained predominant in scenarios with older adults (69.2%) and patients with general comorbidities (65.4%). A minority showed confidence to prescribe antidepressants to children/adolescents (19.2%) and pregnant women (26.9%). For 80.4% of participants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most trusted pharmacological class. Referral to the Psychosocial Care Center was the most reported strategy in cases of insecure prescription (32%). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address such an issue. Thus, it can contribute to more assertive health education actions for PHC physicians.
Os antidepressivos são a terceira classe medicamentosa mais prescrita, sendo que a maioria das prescrições não é realizada por especialistas. O objetivo do estudo é avaliar a autopercepção de confiança na prescrição de antidepressivos por médicos da atenção primária à saúde (APS). Foi realizado estudo de corte transversal de médicos atuantes na APS da cidade de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. Foram excluídos psiquiatras ou residentes de psiquiatria. A autoavaliação da confiança, assim como a coleta de características dos participantes foi realizada por meio de questionário online. Variáveis categóricas foram descritas em termos de frequência absoluta e relativa. Variáveis contínuas foram descritas como média ou mediana, conforme distribuição de normalidade. No contexto total de 447 médicos, a amostra foi composta por 55 participantes. A média de idade foi de 37,2 (±12,8) anos. A maioria dos médicos (75%) reconheceu-se confiante na prescrição de antidepressivos. A autopercepção de confiança manteve-se predominante em cenários de pacientes idosos (69,2%) e portadores de comorbidades gerais (65,4%). A minoria mostrou confiança para prescrever antidepressivos a crianças/adolescentes (19,2%) e gestantes (26,9%). Para 80,4% dos participantes, os inibidores seletivos da recaptação de serotonina foram a classe farmacológica de maior confiança. O encaminhamento para o Centro de Atenção Psicossocial foi a estratégia mais referida em casos de insegurança na prescrição (32%). Até onde se sabe, esse é o primeiro estudo a abordar tal questão. Por essa razão, ele pode contribuir para a construção de ações de educação em saúde mais assertivas voltadas a médicos da APS.
Los antidepresivos son la tercera clase de medicamentos más prescritos, y la mayoría de las prescripciones no son realizadas por especialistas. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar la autopercepción de confianza en la prescripción de antidepresivos por parte de los médicos de atención primaria de salud (APS). Corte transversal de médicos que trabajan en la APS de la ciudad de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. Se excluyeron a los psiquiatras o residentes de psiquiatría. La autoevaluación de la confianza, así como la recolección de las características de los participantes, fue realizada a través de un cuestionario online. Las variables categóricas se describieron en términos de frecuencia absoluta y relativa. Las variables continuas se describieron como media o mediana, según la distribución de normalidad. En el contexto total de 447 médicos, la muestra estaba formada por 55 participantes. La edad promedio fue de 37,2 (±12,8) años. La mayoría de los médicos (75%) se reconocieron confiados en la prescripción de antidepresivos. La autopercepción de confianza se mantuvo predominante en los escenarios de pacientes ancianos (69,2%) y portadores de comorbilidades generales (65,4%). La minoría mostró confianza para prescribir antidepresivos a niños/adolescentes (19,2%) y mujeres embarazadas (26,9%). Para el 80,4% de los participantes, los inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina eran la clase farmacológica de mayor confianza. El encaminamiento para el Centro de Atención Psicosocial fue la estrategia más mencionada en los casos de inseguridad en la prescripción (32%). Hasta donde se sabe, este es el primer estudio que aborda este tema. Por esa razón, puede contribuir para la construcción de acciones de educación en salud más asertivas dirigidas a los médicos de la APS.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Brasil , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Although commonly used in clinical practice, scientific literature about clozapine prescription patterns in Colombia is scarce. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in an outpatient clinic in Bogotá, Colombia. Between 2016 and 2018, clozapine was prescribed to 2603 patients, mainly for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Bipolar and Depressive Disorders, at a median dose of 100mg/day. After controlling for other variables, older age was the only variable that explained the use of doses lower than 100mg/day. Clozapine was not only used for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia, and further studies are needed to explain these differences.
Aunque se utiliza comúnmente en la práctica clínica, la literatura científica sobre los patrones de prescripción de clozapina en Colombia es escasa. Se realizó un estudio observacional transversal en el servicio ambulatorio de una clínica de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia. Entre 2016 y 2018, se recetó clozapina a 2603 pacientes, principalmente para esquizofrenia y trastornos relacionados, trastorno afectivo bipolar y trastornos depresivos, a una dosis media de 100 mg/día. Después de controlar otras variables, la edad avanzada fue la única variable que explicó el uso de dosis inferiores a 100 mg/día. La clozapina no se utilizó sólo para la esquizofrenia resistente al tratamiento, y se necesitan estudios adicionales para explicar estas diferencias.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Humanos , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Colombia , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Ambulatoria , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prescription is the node of medication management and use that most frequently presents medication errors, according to various studies. This study aims to analyze prescriptions before and after the incorporation of a multidisciplinary round in the pediatric intensive care area and its implication in the occurrence of adverse drug events. METHODS: This is an uncontrolled before and after study. RESULTS: 100 patients were studied before and 100 after, range 1-17 years, mean age: 6.4 SD: 8.7. 55.5% (n = 111) were men. A prescription error was detected before the intervention of 12% (n = 12) and after 0% of the intervention, 0%, p = 0.001. A total of 45 adverse events were detected, that is, 45 adverse events per 100 admissions and 38, that is, 38 events per 100 admissions, before and after the intervention respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The intervention was useful to reduce prescription error in this sample of patients.
Introducción: La prescripción es el nodo del manejo y uso de medicamentos que con mayor frecuencia presenta errores de medicación, según diversos estudios. Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar las prescripciones antes y después de la incorporación de una ronda multidisciplinar en el área de cuidados intensivos pediátricos y su implicación en la ocurrencia de eventos adversos por medicamentos. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio antes y después, no controlado. Resultados: Se estudiaron 100 pacientes antes y 100 después, rango 1-17 años, edad media: 6.4 DE: 8.7. El 55.5% (n = 111) eran varones. Se detectó un error de prescripción antes de la intervención del 12% (n = 12) y después de intervención, del 0%, p = 0.001. Se detectó un total de 45 eventos adversos por 100 ingresos y 38 eventos por 100 ingresos, antes y después de la intervención respectivamente (p > 0.05). Conclusión: La intervención fue útil para disminuir el error de prescripción en esta muestra de pacientes.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Errores de Medicación , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Femenino , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prescribing by pharmacists is an increasingly common practice worldwide. In Brazil regulation of this practice began in 2013, and the practice remains unexplored as a research topic. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore and gain insights into pharmacist prescribing practices in Brazil and assessing pharmacist's perceptions of their training and preparedness to prescribe medications. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 via convenience sampling. Data were collected using an online questionnaire covering sociodemographic issues, academic training, prescribing practices, and perceptions regarding the provision of pharmacist prescribing in ambulatory care. Exploratory descriptive analysis and Poisson regression were performed to estimate the associations between pharmacist characteristics and their practices in prescribing medicines. RESULTS: Among the 305 valid responses, 58.7% of the outpatient pharmacists stated that they had not prescribed any medication in the previous three years. Over-the-counter medication prescriptions were most common (42.0%). Only 4.6% of respondents had prescribed prescription-only medicines provided through collaborative agreement, with 2.6% reporting that they had adjusted doses, and 2.3% played a role in prescription renewal. Pharmacists living in Northeast regions tended to be more active prescribers (PR = 1.42; 95%CI 1.03-2.18), whereas those in primary healthcare (PR = 0.61; 95%CI 0.39-0.96) and self-declared Black pharmacists (PR = 0.30; 95%CI 0.10-0.97) prescribed less. Respondents strongly believed in the pharmacist's role as a prescriber, although they remained ambivalent regarding their responsibility for patient outcomes. Progress barriers include infrastructure gaps and strained relationships with physicians. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that pharmacists in Brazil predominantly prescribe over-the-counter medications, and variations in setting, region, and race can influence prescribing by pharmacist in ambulatory care.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Farmacéuticos , Pautas de la Práctica Farmacéutica , Rol Profesional , Humanos , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Brasil , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios Transversales , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elderly people have multiple comorbidities that often require treatment with multiple medications. Having strategies to lessen the risks associated with pharmacological interactions and potentially inadequate prescribing (PIP) is of major importance. The STOPP- START criteria are useful in identifying PIP along with other tools, such as LASA (look alike/sound alike) drugs and high-risk medications (HRM). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clinically and sociodemographically characterize the population with PIP according to the STOPP-START criteria in hospitalized elderly patients over 6 months in a third-level hospital in Colombia, South America. We also aimed to calculate the prevalence of PIP, LASA drugs and HRM and to identify other problems related with medication. Finally, we proposed an algorithm for the identification of PIP in this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study in hospitalized patients older than 60 years during the first semester of 2021 to identify PIP according to STOPP- START criteria. An analysis of clinical and sociodemographic variables was conducted, as well as the construction of an algorithm to identify PIP in the elderly in a semiautomated way. Data were collected and analyzed using the software SPSS 2021, using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency. RESULTS: The prevalence of PIP in the study population was 25%. Furthermore, 60% of patients had one problem related to medication, and 27% used at least one LASA drug or HRM. CONCLUSION: This study allows one to characterize, for the first time, the Colombian population prone to PIP, as well as the construction of an algorithm that identifies PIP in a semiautomated way.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Prescripción Inadecuada , Humanos , Anciano , Colombia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Prevalencia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
El uso de antidepresivos está ampliamente extendido a nivel mundial y junto con las benzodiacepinas son los psicofármacos más prescritos. Son utilizados en un amplio rango de condiciones clínicas, observándose un aumento en su prescripción y consumo a nivel internacional, regional y nacional. En ese sentido, el enfoque que considera el espacio geográfico como dimensión activa en dicha problemática es de incipiente desarrollo. En el presente estudio y a partir de un diseño mixto se analizaron las dimensiones sociotécnicas que generaron geografías de prescripción y consumo de antidepresivos en servicios de salud pública de Montevideo, en usuarios mayores de 14 años, entre marzo 2018 y marzo 2019. Se identificaron espacios de la ciudad con diferentes niveles de consumo y la emergencia del antidepresivo como objeto cultural aglutinante de múltiples situaciones sociosanitarias, siendo nexo entre grupos sociales diversos y distintivo en el reconocimiento de áreas de la ciudad, en tanto problemáticas socioeconómicas y padecimientos psíquicos.
The use of antidepressants is widely spread worldwide; they are the most prescribed psychotropic drugs, together with benzodiazepines. They are used in a wide range of clinical conditions, with an increase in their prescription and use at an international, regional and national level. In that sense, the consideration of geographic space as an active dimension in this problem is an incipient development. In the present study and based on a mixed design, an analysis is presented of the sociotechnical dimensions that generated geographies of prescription and use of antidepressants in public health services of Montevideo, in users over 14 years of age, between March 2018 and March 2019. Authors identify city areas with different levels of antidepressants use and describe its emergence as a cultural object that brings together multiple socio-health situations, becoming a link between diverse social groups and distinctive in the recognition of city areas, with specific socioeconomic problems and psychological sufferings.
Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas Públicos de Salud , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Uruguay/epidemiología , Características de la Residencia , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
Los medicamentos en su formulación de depósito son utilizados como una intervención para la adherencia cuando se dificulta el cumplimiento vía oral. Es frecuente la baja adherencia a los tratamientos por vía oral en las personas con enfermedades crónicas. Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional, descriptivo de corte transversal, de una muestra aleatorizada de los pacientes que reciben antipsicóticos de depósito, asistidos en la Policlínica del Hospital Vilardebó en el año 2014. El objetivo fue describir las características de la población que tiene prescripto antipsicótico de depósito en la consulta ambulatoria y conocer los hábitos prescriptivos de estos para favorecer su uso racional. La patología psiquiátrica más prevalente fue la esquizofrenia con 56,4 %, donde se usó con más frecuencia la pipotiazina, siendo este más oneroso que el tratamiento con haloperidol y con un perfil de seguridad y efectividad similar. No se encontraron diferencias entre el uso de anticolinérgicos para los efectos extrapiramidales. Más de dos tercios de los pacientes (69,7 %) estuvieron con polifarmacia antipsicótica y un cuarto de los pacientes (24,7 %) con más de 2 antipsicóticos, a pesar de que en las pautas internacionales no recomiendan tratamientos que justifiquen el uso de más de dos antipsicóticos, dado que no existe evidencia que avale esta práctica, además del riesgo aumentado de reacciones adversas. Un bajo porcentaje (20 %) recibió la medicación de depósito todos los meses del año, resultando de vital importancia evaluar en estudios posteriores las causas intervinientes.
Depot formulation drugs are used as an adherence intervention when oral adherence is difficult to achieve. Low adherence to oral drugs is commonly observed in people with chronic diseases. An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out on a randomized sample of patients receiving depot antipsychotics, treated at Hospital Vilardebó Outpatient Clinic in 2014. The aim was to describe this population's characteristics and prescription habits at the clinic in order to promote rational use. The most prevalent disorder was Schizophrenia (56.4%); pipothiazine was the most frequently used drug. It is more expensive than haloperidol with similar safety and efficacy profiles. There was no difference in the use of anticholinergic drugs to prevent extrapyramidal side effects. More than two thirds of the patients (69.7%) received antipsychotic polypharmacy and a fourth of the patients (24.7%) received more than two antipsychotics in spite of the fact that international treatment guides do not recommend the use of more than two because of lack of benefit evidence and increased risk of adverse reactions. Only 20 % of the patients received the depot every month of the year, being of vital importance to evaluate in subsequent studies the intervening causes.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Uruguay , Muestreo Aleatorio Simple , Estudios Transversales , Costos de los Medicamentos , Distribución por Sexo , Polifarmacia , Atención Ambulatoria , OctogenariosRESUMEN
Introducción: se describe a nivel mundial un aumento en la prescripción de macrólidos en niños y adolescentes, generando el riesgo de emergencia de cepas resistentes. Objetivo: caracterizar el uso de macrólidos en niños de 1 mes a 14 años hospitalizados en cuidados moderados e intensivos del Hospital Pediátrico del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell (HP-CHPR). Metodología: estudio descriptivo transversal de niños hospitalizados tratados con macrólidos en el HP-CHPR en 2018. Variables: tipo de macrólido, duración del tratamiento, estudios y hallazgos microbiológicos y diagnóstico al egreso. Resultados: recibieron macrólidos 334 niños, mediana de edad 13 meses, 58,4% varones. 71,0% en Unidad de Terapia Intensiva (UTI). Predominó la prescripción de claritromicina (72,8%), durante los dos últimos cuatrimestres del año (77,5%) y por patología respiratoria (94%): bronquiolitis (23,3%), infección aguda no especificada de las vías respiratorias inferiores (21,9%) y crisis asmática (19,1%). Mediana de tratamiento con azitromicina y claritromicina 5 y 8 días respectivamente. Se realizaron estudios microbiológicos en 96,1% sin determinarse microorganismo en 58,3%. Conclusiones: se destaca el uso de macrólidos principalmente en la UTI y por patología respiratoria. La prescripción por fuera de las recomendaciones nacionales vigentes y la baja confirmación microbiológica que apoye el uso fueron los mayores problemas detectados, por lo que parece fundamental establecer estrategias tendientes a promover un uso racional de estos antibióticos.
Introduction: literature has described a global increase in the prescription of macrolides to children and adolescents , which has increased the risk of emergence of resistant strains. Objective: to characterize the use of macrolides in children from 1 month to 14 years of age hospitalized at the moderate and intensive care units of the Pereira Rossell Pediatric Hospital Center (HP-CHPR). Methodology: descriptive cross-sectional study of hospitalized children treated with macrolides at the HP-CHPR in 2018. Variables: macrolide type, treatment duration, microbiological studies and findings, and diagnosis at discharge. Results: 334 children received macrolides, median age 13 months, 58.4% males. 71.0% hospitalized atnan Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Clarithromycin was mainly prescribed in 72.8% of the cases, during the last two quarters of the year (77.5%), due to respiratory disease (94%): bronchiolitis (23.3%), lower respiratory tract unspecified acute infection (21.9%) and asthma crisis (19.1%). Median treatment included Azithromycin and Clarithromycin for 5 and 8 days respectively. Microbiological studies were carried out in 96.1% of the cases and 58.3% did not show the presence of microorganisms. Conclusions: the use of macrolides stands out, mainly at ICUs and due to respiratory pathologies. The main problems identified were prescriptions made outside the framework of the present national recommendations and the low microbiological confirmation for their use, which suggests it is essential to set strategies to promote a more rational use of these antibiotics.
Introdução: a literatura descreve um aumento a nível global na prescrição de macrolídeos para crianças e adolescentes, o que tem aumentado o risco de surgimento de cepas resistentes. Objetivo: caracterizar o uso de macrolídeos em crianças de 1 mês a 14 anos de idade internadas nas unidades de terapia moderada e intensiva do Centro Hospitalar Pediátrico Pereira Rossell (HP-CHPR). Metodologia: estudo transversal descritivo de crianças hospitalizadas tratadas com macrolídeos no HP-CHPR em 2018. Variáveis: tipo de macrolídeo, duração do tratamento, estudos e achados microbiológicos e diagnóstico no momento da alta. Resultados: 334 crianças receberam macrolídeos, idade mediana de 13 meses, 58,4% do sexo masculino. 71,0% internados em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI). A Claritromicina foi prescrita principalmente em 72,8% dos casos, nos últimos dois trimestres do ano (77,5%), devido a doença respiratória (94%): bronquiolite (23,3%), infecção aguda não especificada do trato respiratório inferior (21,9%) e crise de asma (19,1%). O tratamento médio incluiu Azitromicina e Claritromicina por 5 e 8 dias, respectivamente. Estudos microbiológicos foram realizados em 96,1% dos casos e 58,3% não evidenciaram a presença de microrganismos. Conclusões: destaca-se o uso de macrolídeos, principalmente em UTIs, e devido a patologias respiratórias. Os principais problemas identificados foram as prescrições feitas fora das atuais recomendações nacionais e a baixa confirmação microbiológica para sua utilização, o que sugere que é essencial definir estratégias para promover uma utilização mais racional destes antibióticos.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Uruguay/epidemiología , Niño Hospitalizado , Estudios Transversales , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Azitromicina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Abstract To identify and characterize the most frequent Drug Interaction (DI) in a Jundiaí Hospital. Exploratory, descriptive, and analytical cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. The source of the study is 100 prescriptions made by the medical service of a hospital in Jundiaí, dispensed from August to October 2018, by the pharmacy of the mentioned hospital for palliative care, mental health, and emergency care. Data plotting in Excel. Of the 100 prescriptions analyzed 60 had at least one type of interaction, 164 DI were found, 14.6% severe, 67.7% moderate, 17.1% minor and 0.6% unspecified. The mechanism of interaction that most appeared in the study was pharmacodynamics, 54.3%, pharmacokinetics were present in 34.1% of DI and 11.6% were not specified. The group most affected by DI was male 33% of prescriptions, female 27%, and 40% showed no interactions. The age group with the most interactions was from 50 to 59 years old. Of the prescriptions that had MI, those with 4 or more interactions were the ones that prevailed. The class of drugs that presented the most interactions was psychotropic drugs. A relevant frequency of interactions was identified by the present study, being the class of psychotropic drugs the most evident and interactions of medium severity the most found, which may be responsible for lowering the clinical condition of patients and the need of possible additional interventions. The data presented may contribute as epidemiological indicators, guiding corrective actions, aiming at the welfare of patients
Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Hospitales/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/clasificación , Pacientes/clasificación , Farmacia/clasificación , Estudios Transversales/métodos , PolifarmaciaRESUMEN
Introdução: A crença de que o uso de Inibidores de Bomba de Prótons (IBPs) apresenta baixo risco de toxicidade, resultou em um aumento significativo na sua prescrição em nível mundial, esse fator juntamente com a baixa divulgação de orientações, têm contribuído para o aumento das indicações desnecessárias de inibidores de bomba de prótons em nível hospitalar, principalmente para profilaxia. Objetivo: Analisar a utilização dos inibidores de bomba de prótons em pacientes internados nas enfermarias de clínica médica de um Hospital Universitário, visando avaliar suas indicações, tempo de uso, efeitos adversos e impacto financeiro gerado pelo uso inadequado. Métodos: Foram analisados prontuários de pacientes que estiveram internados nas enfermarias de clínica médica do Hospital Municipal Universitário de Taubaté (HMUT) durante os meses de maio a julho de 2020. As indicações adequadas do uso de inibidores de bomba de prótons foram baseadas em diretrizes internacionais do American Journal of Gastroenterology e do American Society of Health-System Pharmacy. Resultados: Identificamos que 297 pacientes (79,6%) usaram inibidores de bomba de prótons em algum momento da internação. O uso desse medicamento foi adequadamente prescrito em 49,8% dos casos. Foi encontrado maior prevalência de pneumonia e diarreia nos pacientes que fizeram uso de inibidores de bomba de prótons a longo prazo. O custo anual associado as prescrições indevidas foram de R$24.736,40. Conclusão: Observamos alta prevalência de indicações incorretas dos inibidores de bomba de prótons em ambiente hospitalar, ocasionando gasto desnecessário e possíveis complicações. Faz-se necessário, portanto, elaboração de novos protocolos e maior rigidez nas indicações desses medicamentos no Hospital Municipal Universitário de Taubaté.
Introduction: The belief that the use of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) presents a low risk of toxicity, resulted in a significant increase in its prescription worldwide, this factor combined with the low disclosure of guidelines, have contributed to the increase in unnecessary indications of at the hospital level, especially for prophylaxis. Objective: To analyze the use of proton pump inhibitors in patients hospitalized in the medical clinic wards of a University Hospital, in order to evaluate their indications, time of use, adverse effects and financial impact generated by inadequate use. Methods: Medical records of patients who were admitted at the Municipal University Hospital of Taubaté during the months of May to July 2020 were analyzed. The appropriate indications for the use of proton pump inhibitors were based on the international guidelines of the American Journal of Gastroenterology and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacy. Results: We identified that 297 patients (79.6%) used proton pump inhibitors at some point in hospitalization. The use of this drug was adequately prescribed in 49.8% of the cases. A higher prevalence of pneumonia and diarrhea was found in patients who used proton pump inhibitors in the long term. The annual cost associated with undue prescriptions was R$24,736.40. Conclusion: We observed a high prevalence of incorrect indications of proton pump inhibitors s in the hospital environment, causing unnecessary expenses and possible complications. It is necessary, therefore, the elaboration of new protocols and greater rigidity in the indications of these drugs at the Municipal University Hospital of Taubaté.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Prescripción Inadecuada/efectos adversos , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Hospitalización , Pacientes InternosRESUMEN
Introducción. Los Criterios de Beers son los más utilizados para evaluar el uso de medicación potencialmente inapropiada en grandes poblaciones, pero no contemplan algunos medicamentos de uso frecuente fuera de los EE.UU. Objetivo. Realizar una adaptación al contexto de Argentina de los Criterios de Beers publicados en 2019. Métodos. Fue elaborada una lista preliminar de medicación potencialmente inapropiada adaptada a la comercialización local, que luego fue consensuada por un panel de expertos (método Delphi). Resultados. De los 112 medicamentos originales listados en la tabla dos de los Criterios de Beers (en forma individual o como grupo), fueron excluidos 36 por no estar disponibles el país y fueron sumados 23 que no se comercializan en los EE.UU. pero sí en Argentina. Luego de dos rondas y de consensuar la suma a esta lista de dos grupos farmacológicos(antimigrañosos y vasodilatadores periféricos), fue acordado el agregado de picosulfato, bisacodilo, senósidos y cáscara sagrada como medicación potencialmente inapropiada en el grupo de agentes contra el estreñimiento, la fluoxetina entre los inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina y el Ginkgo biloba como droga contra la demencia. También hubo consenso en advertir el riesgo de hipotensión ortostática asociado a la tamsulosina, en aconsejar la consideración de la carga anticolinérgica total del esquema terapéutico administrado y en recomendar al paracetamol como primera línea de tratamiento del dolor, asociado o no a opioides. Conclusiones. Contar con una versión de los Criterios de Beers 2019 adaptada al contexto de Argentina contribuirá al desarrollo y monitoreo de intervenciones para prevenir y reducir el consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada. (AU)
Introduction.The Beers Criteria is the most widely used criteria to assess the use of potentially inappropriate medication in large populations, but they do not include some medications that are frequently used outside the United States. Objective.To make an adaptation of the Beers Criteria published in 2019 to the context of Argentina. Methods. A preliminary list of potentially inappropriate medication adapted to local market and practice was designed, which was then agreed upon by a panel of experts (Delphi method). Results. Of the 112 original drugs in the table 2 of the Beers Criteria (individually or as a group), 36 were excluded because they were not available in Argentina and 23 locally marketed drugs but not in the US were included. After two rounds and agreeing to add two additional pharmacological groups to this list (antimigraine and peripheral vasodilators), it was decided to add picosulfate, bisacodyl, sennosides and cascara sagrada as potentially inappropriate medication in the group of anti-constipation agents, fluoxetine among. the selective serotonin reup take inhibitors and Ginkgo biloba as an anti-dementia drug. There was also consensus in warning about the risk of orthostatic hypotension associated with tamsulosin,in advising consideration of the total anticholinergic load of the therapeutic regimen administered, and in recommending paracetamol as the first line of pain treatment, associated or not with opioids. Conclusions. Having a version of the Beers Criteria 2019 adapted to the Argentine context will contribute to the development and monitoring of interventions to prevent and reduce the consumption of potentially inappropriate medication. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/prevención & control , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/normas , Sistemas de Medicación/normas , Argentina , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnica Delphi , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated polyneuropathy that compromises the peripheral and cranial nerves. It is characterized by rapid-onset paresthesia accompanied by progressive weakness in the lower extremities followed by symmetric ascending paralysis. METHODOLOGY: assessment of sensitivity to detect GBS between March 2017 and May 2019 in a public referral hospital, using the capture-recapture method based on the Chapman estimator and comparing three GBS data sources: the hospital-based sentinel surveillance system (VSBH), Human Immunoglobulin Dispensing Records System (RDIH), and Hospital Information System (SIH). RESULTS: A total of 259 possible cases were identified (captured). Of these, 58 were confirmed and most resided in the Federal District. The VSBH showed the greatest sensitivity in case identification. The temporal distribution of cases showed periods with no cases identified, and more were registered during the rainy season from October to May, when high temperatures also occur. CONCLUSIONS: Increased circulation of arboviruses and gastrointestinal infections during the rainy season may explain the greater concentration of GBS cases. It is important to note that one-third of the cases identified in the different data sources do not converge, demonstrating that no single surveillance system is 100% effective. The severity and possible increase in cases related to GBS demonstrates the need for an improved surveillance system capable of monitoring and following-up cases involving neurological syndromes, regardless of the event preceding infection.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Vigilancia de Guardia , Brasil/epidemiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Oral health practitioners are responsible for a significant share of opioid prescriptions that seem to be influenced by many aspects, including sociodemographic factors. However, there is no consensus on the factors associated with opioid prescription in Dentistry. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether patients' sociodemographic factors are associated with the prescription pattern of opioids in Dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review will include observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort). Electronic searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, LILACS, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Grey literature will also be consulted. Two independent reviewers will screen all retrieved articles for eligibility, extract data, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The results will be presented as a narrative synthesis and, where possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020211226.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Factores Socioeconómicos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe longitudinal health care utilization of Medicaid-insured children with a history of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) compared with similar children without NAS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Data were extracted from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract files for all available states and DC from 2003-2013. Subjects were followed up to 11 years. In total, 17 229 children with NAS were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 779.5. Children without NAS, matched on demographic and health variables, served as the comparison group. Outcomes were number of claims for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department encounters, numbers of prescription claims, and costs associated with these services. Linked claims were identified for each subject using a unique, within-state ID. RESULTS: Children with NAS had increased claims for inpatient admissions (marginal effect [ME] 0.49; SE 0.01) and emergency department visits (ME 0.30; SE 0.04) through year 1; increased prescriptions (ME 1.45; SE 0.08, age 0) (ME 0.69; SE 0.11, age 1 year) through year 2; and increased outpatient encounters (ME 20.13; SE 0.54, age 0) (ME 3.95; SE 0.62, age 1 year) (ME 2.90; SE 1.11, age 2 years) through year 3 after adjusting for potential confounders (P < .01 for all). Beyond the third year, health care utilization was similar between those with and without NAS. CONCLUSIONS: Children with a diagnosis of NAS have greater health care utilization through the third year of life. These differences resolve by the fourth year. Our results suggest resolution of disparities may be due to shifts in developmental health management in school-age children and inability to track relevant diagnoses in a health care database.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid/economía , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/economía , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pediatric subspecialists' practices and attitudes regarding sexual and reproductive healthcare for adolescent and young adult women for whom they prescribe teratogens. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed pediatric subspecialists at 1 tertiary care pediatric hospital. Items assessed attitudes and practices related to sexual and reproductive healthcare for adolescent and young adult women prescribed teratogens, and barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive healthcare provision. We used descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and logistic regression to analyze results. RESULTS: There were 200 subspecialists from 17 subspecialties who completed the survey; 77% reported prescribing teratogens to adolescent and young adult women and 18% reported caring for a patient who became pregnant while taking a teratogen. Overall, 99% indicated that it is important to address sexual and reproductive healthcare. Respondents endorsed confidence in sexual and reproductive healthcare skills, including contraceptive counseling (71%), although 29% never or rarely discuss sexual and reproductive healthcare, and one-third never speak privately to this population. Of providers who discuss sexual and reproductive healthcare, 26% never assess reproductive intentions and 36% do so less often than annually. Nearly one-half never or rarely ask about sexual activity, and 68% never or rarely assess contraceptive knowledge. Barriers to sexual and reproductive healthcare provision included available time (80%) and the presence of family or partners at clinic visits (61%). Facilitators included a quick referral process to sexual and reproductive healthcare providers (92%) and access to lists of local sexual and reproductive healthcare providers (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric subspecialists from a single institution report suboptimal sexual and reproductive healthcare provision for adolescent and young adult women prescribed teratogens. Identified barriers and facilitators may guide intervention development to improve sexual and reproductive healthcare for this population.
Asunto(s)
Actitud , Anticoncepción/métodos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Planificación Familiar/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Conducta Sexual/efectos de los fármacos , Teratógenos/farmacología , Adolescente , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe antibiotic prescribing patterns in ambulatory children with community-acquired pneumonia and to assess the relationship between antibiotic selection and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of ambulatory Medicaid-enrolled children 0-18 years of age diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia from 2010 to 2016. The exposure was antibiotic class: narrow-spectrum (aminopenicillins), broad-spectrum (amoxicillin/clavulanate and cephalosporins), macrolide monotherapy, macrolides with narrow-spectrum antibiotics, or macrolides with broad-spectrum antibiotics. The associations between antibiotic selection and the outcomes of subsequent hospitalization and development of severe pneumonia (chest drainage procedure, intensive care admission, mechanical ventilation) were assessed, controlling for measures of illness severity. RESULTS: Among 252 177 outpatient pneumonia visits, macrolide monotherapy was used in 43.2%, narrow-spectrum antibiotics in 26.1%, and broad-spectrum antibiotics in 24.7%. A total of 1488 children (0.59%) were subsequently hospitalized and 117 (0.05%) developed severe pneumonia. Compared with children receiving narrow-spectrum antibiotics, the odds of subsequent hospitalization were higher in children receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.52) and lower in children receiving macrolide monotherapy (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.73) and macrolides with narrow-spectrum antibiotics (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.97). Children receiving macrolide monotherapy had lower odds of developing severe pneumonia than children receiving narrow-spectrum antibiotics (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93). However, the absolute risk difference was <0.5% for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Macrolides are the most commonly prescribed antibiotic for ambulatory children with community-acquired pneumonia. Subsequent hospitalization and severe pneumonia are rare. Future efforts should focus on reducing broad-spectrum and macrolide antibiotic prescribing.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate omeprazole prescriptions for older adults based on the Beers Criteria, with an analysis of indications and duration of use longer than eight weeks. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, data were collected from the electronic medical records of older adults with an omeprazole prescription seen at two health care units in Curitiba, Brazil, between June and August 2019. Data were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis, Student t and χ2 tests. RESULTS: Medical records of 386 patients were analyzed, and 69.95% were female. The mean age was 71 (SD, 8.15) years. Most patients had incomplete primary education (50.52%) and income level ranging from one to two Brazilian minimum monthly wages (39.90%). No indication for omeprazole prescription was found in 23.83% of medical records. Use longer than eight weeks was predominant for all indications in 96.60% of medical records. Duration of use more extended than the Beers Criteria recommendation was independent of sex (p = 0.327), education (p = 0.805), and income level (p = 0.629). A relationship between polypharmacy and long-term drug use was demonstrated (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest the need for periodic review of omeprazole prescriptions considering deprescribing when they appropriate.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar as prescrições de omeprazol para idosos de acordo com os Critérios de Beers, por meio das indicações e do tempo de uso do medicamento por período superior a oito semanas. METODOLOGIA: Estudo transversal, retrospectivo, no qual foram coletados dados dos prontuários eletrônicos de idosos com prescrição de omeprazol atendidos entre junho e agosto de 2019 em duas unidades de saúde em Curitiba. Os dados foram submetidos à análise estatística descritiva e aos testes t de Student e do χ2 . RESULTADOS: Foram analisados prontuários de 386 usuários, sendo 69,95% do sexo feminino. A média de idade foi de 71 anos (DP, 8,15). A maioria dos usuários tem ensino fundamental incompleto (50,52%) e faixa de renda de um a dois salários mínimos (39,90%). Não foi encontrada a indicação para a prescrição de omeprazol em 23,83% dos prontuários. O uso por período superior a oito semanas foi predominante, para todas as indicações, em 96,60% dos prontuários. Demonstrou-se que o tempo de uso superior ao recomendado nos Critérios de Beers independe do sexo (p = 0,327), da escolaridade (p = 0,805) e da faixa de renda (p = 0,629). Evidenciou-se a relação entre polifarmácia e uso do medicamento por períodos prolongados (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados deste estudo apontam para a necessidade de revisão periódica das prescrições de omeprazol, considerando-se a desprescrição quando apropriado.