RESUMEN
Antibiotics are often prescribed inappropriately, either when they are not needed or with an unnecessarily broad spectrum of activity. This is a serious problem that can lead to the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study was conducted to assess the antibiotic prescribing pattern in pediatric patients hospitalized at a quaternary hospital in Nampula, Mozambique, using the WHO indicators and Framework as a reference. A retrospective study was conducted using secondary data obtained from medical records. The study population consisted of children aged 0-10 years who were hospitalized in a quaternary-level hospital ward in Nampula, Mozambique. The pattern of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed using indicators and the WHO classification of antibiotics into AWaRe categories. Descriptive statistics were applied. A total of 464 antibiotics were prescribed during the study. The age groups of 1-3 years and 28 days-12 months were prescribed more antibiotics. The most common antibiotics were ceftriaxone and crystallized penicillin, which were frequently prescribed for patients suffering from bronchopneumonia, gastroenteritis, and malaria. 74.8% of the antibiotics prescribed belonged to the Access group, while 23.7% belonged to the Watch group. There were no prescriptions of antibiotics from the Reserve group. The average number of antibiotics per prescription was 1.51 (SD ± 0.725). The percentage of antibiotic prescribing was 97.5%, with 96.20% by injection. All antibiotics prescribed were on the essential medicines list and prescribed by generic name. These results are concerning and highlight the urgency of strengthening antimicrobial optimization measures, as well as implementing the AWaRe framework in antibiotic prescribing as an essential strategy to combat AMR.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Mozambique , Lactante , Preescolar , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed to treat anxiety and insomnia, but long-term use has been associated with the development of dependence, tolerance, and cognitive decline, especially among older adults. This study aimed to investigate the pattern of consumption and factors associated with inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines in primary health care. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analytical study, using dispensing records of diazepam, clonazepam, and nitrazepam from public pharmacies in a Brazilian municipality between 2018 and 2022. Metrics for benzodiazepine consumption were DDD (Defined Daily Dose) and DDD/1000PD (per 1000 population per day). Long-term/prolonged benzodiazepine use was defined as consuming at least 90 DDD and at least 2 dispensations per year. To ascertain associations between long-term use and predictor variables, a multivariate logistic regression model was utilized. FINDINGS: A total of 40402 participants were included, with an average age of 55 years (SD = 0.30), 38.5% were older aged. Diazepam and nitrazepam exceeded the daily dose recommended. There was a reduction in diazepam consumption during the study period, as calculated by DDD/1.000PD, while the consumption of other benzodiazepines remained stable. However, a significant increase in diazepam consumption is noted when considering the last decade. Prolonged use was observed in 29.1% of participants, with a significant prevalence among the older people (34.8% of them were long-term users) and advancing age was identified as a risk factor for long-term use. Higher PDDs were also associated with long-term use and aging. Participants who used different benzodiazepines during the period had a higher risk of prolonged use. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insights into the prevalence of problematic utilization of benzodiazepines in primary health care. Authorities and health care providers must take steps to encourage gradual cessation of prolonged benzodiazepine prescriptions and the embrace of suitable strategies for addressing anxiety and insomnia within primary health care settings.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Prescripción Inadecuada , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Brasil , Adulto , Diazepam/uso terapéutico , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Nitrazepam/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Clonazepam/uso terapéutico , Clonazepam/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been documented that NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs) reduce the effectiveness of some antihypertensive drugs. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the prescription of NSAID and the variables associated in outpatients with hypertension and explore some characteristics of the physicians. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study, included patients with hypertension from the Family Medicine Unit No. 24 in Mante, Tamaulipas. From the patients, sociodemographic data, clinical history and pharmacological treatments were obtained. From the physicians, sociodemographic and academic information were collected. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 63 ± 11 years and 31.7% were prescribed NSAIDs. When compare exposed versus non-exposed to NSAIDs, being in uncontrolled high blood pressure, uncontrolled hypertension, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The variables associated to the prescription of NSAIDs were: uncontrolled hypertension, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The 56.7% of the physicians were women, 83.3% with experience >10 years and 33.3% with current certification by the Council in Family Medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriate prescription of NSAIDs revealed the need to implement actions to mitigate the potential risk for the hypertension patients to present a complication.
ANTECEDENTES: Los antiinflamatorios y los antirreumáticos no esteroideos (AINE) disminuyen la eficacia de algunos antihipertensivos. OBJETIVO: Analizar el patrón de prescripción de AINE y las variables asociadas en pacientes ambulatorios con diagnóstico de hipertensión arterial, así como explorar algunas características de los médicos prescriptores. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal de pacientes con hipertensión de la Unidad de Medicina Familiar 24 en Ciudad Mante, Tamaulipas. De los pacientes se registraron datos sociodemográficos, antecedentes patológicos y tratamientos farmacológicos; y de los médicos, información sociodemográfica y académica. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 63 ± 11 años, 31.7 % recibía AINE y al contrastarlos con quienes no los recibían, se identificó mayor proporción de obesidad, presión arterial más elevada, más casos en descontrol de la hipertensión arterial, multimorbilidad y polimedicación. Las variables asociadas a la prescripción de AINE fueron estar en descontrol de la hipertensión arterial, multimorbilidad y polimedicación; 56.7 % de los médicos prescriptores fue del sexo femenino, 83.3 % con antigüedad superior a 10 años y 33.3 % con certificación vigente. CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción inapropiada de AINE reveló la necesidad de implementar acciones para mitigar el riesgo potencial de los pacientes hipertensos de presentar una complicación.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Antirreumáticos , Hipertensión , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Polifarmacia , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Introduction: Medications are a fundamental part of the treatment of multiple pathologies. However, despite their benefits, some are considered potentially inappropriate medications for older people given their safety profile. Epidemiological data differences related to potentially inappropriate medications make it difficult to determine their effects on elderly people. Objective: To estimate the prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate medications using the 2019 Beers Criteria® in a cohort of adults older than 65 years. Materials and methods: We performed an observational, multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study of a four-year follow-up of potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older adults. Results: We followed 820 participants from five cities for four years (2012-2016) and evaluated them in three different moments (m1 = 2012, m2 = 2014, and m3 = 2016). The average age was 69.07 years, and 50.9% were women. The potentially inappropriate medication prevalence in the participants was 40.24%. The potentially inappropriate medications' mean among the studied subjects in the first moment was 1.65 (SD = 0.963), in the second was 1.73 (SD = 1.032), and in the third was 1.62 (SD = 0.915). There were no statistical differences between measurements (Friedman test, value = 0.204). The most frequent potentially inappropriate medications categories were gastrointestinal (39.4%), analgesics (18.8%), delirium-related drugs (15.4%), benzodiazepines (15.2%), and cardiovascular (14.2%). Conclusions: About half of the population of the community-dwelling older adults had prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications in a sustained manner and without significant variability over time. Mainly potentially inappropriate medications were gastrointestinal and cardiovascular drugs, analgesics, delirium-related drugs, and benzodiazepines.
Introducción. Los fármacos son parte fundamental del tratamiento de múltiples enfermedades. Sin embargo, a pesar de sus beneficios, algunos se consideran medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en adultos mayores, dado su perfil de seguridad. Las diferencias en los datos epidemiológicos relacionados con los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados dificultan el establecimiento de sus efectos en adultos mayores. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia longitudinal y los tipos de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados, utilizando los criterios Beers® del 2019 en una cohorte de adultos mayores de 65 años. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo y longitudinal, de cuatro años de seguimiento de los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en adultos mayores de la comunidad. Resultados. Se evaluaron 820 participantes de cinco ciudades durante cuatro años (2012 a 2016) en tres momentos (m1: 2012, m2: 2014 y m3; 2016). La edad promedio fue de 69,07 años y el 50,9 % eran mujeres. La prevalencia de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en los participantes fue del 40,24 %. El promedio de estos medicamentos entre los sujetos estudiados en el primer momento fue de 1,65 (DE = 0,963), en el segundo fue de 1,73 (DE = 1,032) y en el tercero fue de 1,62 (DE = 0,915). No hubo diferencias estadísticas entre las mediciones (prueba de Friedman, p = 0,204). Las categorías de los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados más frecuentes fueron: gastrointestinales (39,4 %), analgésicos (18,8 %), relacionados con delirium (15,4 %), benzodiacepinas (15,2 %) y cardiovasculares (14,2 %). Conclusiones. En cerca de la mitad de la población de adultos mayores de la comunidad, se prescribieron medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados de manera sostenida y sin variabilidad importante en el tiempo. Los más recetados fueron aquellos para tratar malestares gastrointestinales y cardiovasculares, analgésicos, para el delirium y benzodiacepinas.
Asunto(s)
Vida Independiente , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Older adults with advanced chronic diseases and palliative care needs are more exposed to polypharmacy and use of potentially inappropriate medication, which generates a high risk of adverse events and impaired quality of life. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with palliative care needs receiving home care services after hospital discharge. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of pharmacy dispensing and electronic health records, of older adults in a home care system and with palliative care needs according to the screening with the NECPAL tool or the PROFUND and/or PALIAR indexes. Dispensed medications during 180 days after admission to home care were analyzed. Medications were classified as potentially inappropriate according to the LESS-CHRON criteria. RESULTS: We included 176 patients, mean age 87.4 years, 67% were women; 73% were pluripathologic patients and 22% had one chronic progressive disease. Mortality at 6 months was 73%. Median frequency of dispensed medications per patient was 9.1 (IQR = 4-9.7). The frequency of potentially inappropriate medication dispensation among patients was 87%, mainly antihypertensives, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: This study observed that dispensation of potentially inappropriate medication among older adults with palliative care needs and home care services is very high. This emphasizes the need for effective patient-centered interventions to prevent inadequate prescription and stimulate de-prescription.
Introducción: Los adultos mayores con enfermedades crónicas avanzadas y necesidad de cuidados paliativos están más expuestos a la polifarmacia y a consumir medicación potencialmente inapropiada, la cual genera un alto riesgo de eventos adversos y alteración de la calidad de vida. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la frecuencia de consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada de adultos mayores con necesidad de cuidados paliativos que ingresaron a cuidados domiciliarios luego de una hospitalización. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal observacional de registros de dispensación e historias clínicas electrónicas, de adultos mayores en un sistema de cuidados domiciliarios y con necesidades de cuidados paliativos según el rastreo con la herramienta NECPAL, los índices PROFUND y/o PALIAR. Se analizó el consumo de fármacos durante los 180 días posteriores al ingreso a cuidados domiciliarios. Se clasificaron los fármacos como potencialmente inapropiados según criterios de LESS-CHRON. Resultados: Se incluyeron 176 pacientes, edad promedio 87.4 años, 67% mujeres; 78% eran pluripatológicos y 22% presentaban una enfermedad única crónica progresiva. La mortalidad a los 6 meses fue 73%. La mediana de consumo de fármacos por paciente fue 9.1 (RIC = 4-9.7). El 87% consumía medicación potencialmente inapropiada, principalmente antihipertensivos, benzodiacepinas y antipsicóticos. Conclusión: Este estudio observó que los adultos mayores, con necesidad de cuidados paliativos en cuidados domiciliarios, tienen un alto consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada. Esto refuerza la necesidad de implementar intervenciones efectivas centradas en el paciente, para prevenir la prescripción inadecuada y estimular la de-prescripción.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Prescripción Inadecuada , Cuidados Paliativos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Polifarmacia , Enfermedad Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
This study is a systematic literature review of the association between lists of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) in clinical practice and health outcomes of older adults followed up in primary health care. For this purpose, the PRISMA protocol was used to systematize the search for articles in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central, LIVIVO and LILACS databases, in addition to the gray literature. Studies with randomized clinical trials were selected, using explicit criteria (lists) for the identification and management of PIM in prescriptions of older patients in primary care. Of the 2,400 articles found, six were used for data extraction. The interventions resulted in significant reductions in the number of PIM and adverse drug events and, consequently, in potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) in polymedicated older adults. However, there were no significant effects of the interventions on negative clinical outcomes, such as emergency room visits, hospitalizations and death, or on improving the health status of the older adults. The use of PIM lists promotes adequate medication prescriptions for older adults in primary health care, but further studies are needed to determine the impact of reducing PIM on primary clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , PolifarmaciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elderly people have multiple comorbidities that often require treatment with multiple medications. Having strategies to lessen the risks associated with pharmacological interactions and potentially inadequate prescribing (PIP) is of major importance. The STOPP- START criteria are useful in identifying PIP along with other tools, such as LASA (look alike/sound alike) drugs and high-risk medications (HRM). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clinically and sociodemographically characterize the population with PIP according to the STOPP-START criteria in hospitalized elderly patients over 6 months in a third-level hospital in Colombia, South America. We also aimed to calculate the prevalence of PIP, LASA drugs and HRM and to identify other problems related with medication. Finally, we proposed an algorithm for the identification of PIP in this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study in hospitalized patients older than 60 years during the first semester of 2021 to identify PIP according to STOPP- START criteria. An analysis of clinical and sociodemographic variables was conducted, as well as the construction of an algorithm to identify PIP in the elderly in a semiautomated way. Data were collected and analyzed using the software SPSS 2021, using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency. RESULTS: The prevalence of PIP in the study population was 25%. Furthermore, 60% of patients had one problem related to medication, and 27% used at least one LASA drug or HRM. CONCLUSION: This study allows one to characterize, for the first time, the Colombian population prone to PIP, as well as the construction of an algorithm that identifies PIP in a semiautomated way.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Prescripción Inadecuada , Humanos , Anciano , Colombia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Prevalencia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Objectives: To estimate the anticholinergic burden in geriatric patients using two scales and to assess the degree of agreement between them. Methods: Data from an observational study conducted in a primary health care service were used. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Belgian Scale Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale and the Brazilian Scale of Medicines with Anticholinergic Activity. The cumulative anticholinergic burden score was classified using a categorical approach: Brazilian scale (0: none; 1 2: low; ≥ 3: high) and Belgian scale (0: none; 0.5 1.5: low; ≥ 2: high). The degree of agreement between the two instruments was obtained through Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: A total of 374 older people were included, most of them female and aged between 60 and 69 years. At least one potentially inappropriate drug with anticholinergic activity was used by 60.70% of patients according to the Brazilian scale and 32.89% by the Belgian scale. On average, 20.85% were under high anticholinergic exposure. Overall, on both scales, the most commonly recurrent medications were those indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Agreement between the scales was moderate (Kappa = 0.43). Conclusions: A high percentage of older adults was exposed to drugs with an anticholinergic burden, posing risks to health and quality of life. Consensus is needed on how anticholinergic burden is calculated by these scores, as well as standardization of the list of included drugs.
Objetivos: Estimar a carga anticolinérgica em idosos com base em duas escalas e avaliar o grau de concordância entre estas. Metodologia: Foram utilizados dados de um estudo observacional realizado em um serviço de atenção primária. A carga anticolinérgica foi avaliada pela escala belga Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale e da Escala Brasileira de Medicamentos com Atividade Anticolinérgica. A pontuação da carga anticolinérgica cumulativa foi classificada utilizando uma abordagem categórica: escala brasileira (0: nenhuma, 1 2: baixa, ≥ 3: alta) e escala belga (0: nenhuma, 0,5 1,5: baixa, ≥ 2: alta). O grau de concordância entre as duas ferramentas foi obtido por meio do coeficiente Capa de Cohen. Resultados: Foram incluídos 374 idosos, a maioria do sexo feminino e com idade entre 60 a 69 anos. O uso de pelo menos um medicamento potencialmente inapropriado com atividade anticolinérgica foi verificado em 60,70% dos idosos com a aplicação da escala brasileira e em 32,89% com a escala belga. Em média, 20.85% estavam sob alta exposição anticolinérgica. De modo geral, os medicamentos mais recorrentes, para ambas as escalas, foram os indicados para o tratamento de transtornos psiquiátricos. A concordância entre as escalas foi moderada (Capa = 0,43). Conclusão: Um percentual elevado de idosos estava exposto a medicamentos com carga anticolinérgica, representando riscos para a saúde e a qualidade de vida. É necessário um consenso sobre como calcular a carga anticolinérgica nos diferentes escores, bem como a padronização da lista de medicamentos incluídos.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Centros de Salud , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/administración & dosificación , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines (CG) are used to reduce variability in practice when the scientific evidence is sparse or when multiple therapies are available. The development and implementation of evidence-based CG is intended to organize and provide the best available evidence to support clinical decision making in order to improve quality of care. Upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) are the leading cause of misuse of antibiotics and a CG may reduce the unnecessary antibiotic prescription. METHODS: The aim of this quasi-experimental, before-after study was to analyze the short- and long-term effects of the implementation of a CG to decrease the rate of antibiotic prescription in URTI cases in the emergency department of a third level private hospital in Quito, Ecuador. The study included 444 patients with a main diagnosis of URTI. They were distributed in three groups: a baseline cohort 2011 (n = 114), a first post-implementation cohort 2011 (n = 114), and a later post-implementation cohort 2018 (n = 216). The implementation strategy consisted of five key steps: acceptance of the need for implementation of the CG, dissemination of the CG, an educational campaign, constant feedback, and sustainability of the strategy through continuous training. RESULTS: The results of this study show a 42.90% of antibiotic prescription rate before the CG implementation. After the implementation of the CG, the prescription rate of antibiotics was significantly reduced by 24.5% (42.9% vs 18.4%, p<0.0001) and the appropriate antibiotic prescription rate was significantly increased by 44.2% (22.4% vs 66.6%, p<0.0001) in the first post-implementation cohort 2011. There was not a significant difference in antibiotic prescription rate and appropriate antibiotic prescription rate between two post-implementation cohorts: 18.4% vs 25.9% (p = 0.125) and 66.6% vs 50% (p = 0.191), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of CGs decreases the rate of antibiotic prescription in URTI cases. The results are remarkable after early implementation, but the effect persists over time. The emphasis must shift from guideline development to strategy implementation.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Ecuador , Femenino , Hospitales Privados , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Older adults are the leading users of medications, where this can be associated with a high number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and consequent harm to health. No Brazilian study evaluating potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) was found. This study determined and analyzed the prevalence of PIP and PIM prescribed for older people with AD.A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Specialty Drugs Pharmacy in the city of Sorocaba, São Paulo State, Brazil. The MEDEX system provided the register in older people with AD and data were collected during interviews with patients and/or caregivers between June and September 2017. The PIMs were identified according to the 2019 Beers Criteria. The association between PIMs and independent variables was analyzed by Poisson regression.This study included 234 older patients with AD. The prevalence of PIP prescribed was 66.7% (nâ=â156). Of the 1073 medications prescribed, 30.5% (nâ=â327) were inappropriate with most affecting the central nervous system or cardiovascular, particularly quetiapine (12.8%) and acetylsalicylic acid (11.6%), respectively. Around 45.2% of the PIMs should be avoided in older people, especially sertraline (14.2%) and clonazepam (7.4%). After adjusted analysis, the PIMs were associated with the diagnosis of depression (P = 0.010) and the number of comorbidities (Pâ=â0.005).There was a high number of PIMs among older people, a substantial number of which should have been avoided in this population. Health care professionals can apply these findings to improve safety in the use of medications for treating patients with AD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Fármacos del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Fármacos del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Clonazepam/efectos adversos , Clonazepam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Polifarmacia , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/efectos adversos , Sertralina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the frequency, profile, and additional variables associated with the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) to older adults in primary care, and evaluate physicians' knowledge about these medications. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from patient records for the period of January 2014 to December 2017 in a city located in the state of Minas Gerais. The frequency of PIM use was evaluated based on the 2019 Beers-Fick criteria. Physician knowledge was evaluated using a validated questionnaire as a primary data source. RESULTS: In a sample of 423 older adults, 75.89% (n = 321) used at least one PIM, the most common of which were medications used to treat central nervous system disorders (48.00%; n = 203). Most participants were female (62.41%; n = 264) and 70 years or older (69.50%; n = 294). When presented with clinical cases illustrating common situations in the management of older patients, 53.33% of physicians (n = 8) answered four or five questions correctly out of a possible seven; 13.33% (n = 2) answered six questions correctly; and 33.33% (n = 5) obtained three correct answers or fewer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed a high frequency of PIM use among older adults treated in Primary Health Care settings, with medications used in the treatment of central nervous system disorders. Our results highlight the importance of continuing education for health professionals and improved assessments of the medication available in the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde; SUS) for use in older adults, especially those taking multiple medications.
OBJETIVOS: Analisar a frequência, o perfil e os fatores associados à prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) aos idosos na Atenção Primária à Saúde, além de avaliar o conhecimento dos médicos sobre esses medicamentos. METODOLOGIA: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, cujas informações foram coletadas de prontuários dos pacientes, referentes ao período de janeiro de 2014 a dezembro de 2017, em um município localizado no estado de Minas Gerais. Para análise da frequência de uso de MPI, utilizou-se o critério Beers-Fick de 2019. Para avaliação do conhecimento médico, utilizou-se uma fonte primária de informação, um questionário validado. RESULTADOS: Dos 423 idosos, 75,89% (n=321) utilizavam pelo menos um MPI e a classe mais utilizada foi do sistema nervoso central (48,00%; n=203). Houve maior prevalência no sexo feminino (62,41%; n=264) e em idosos com idade ≥70 anos (69,50%; n=294). Em relação aos casos clínicos apresentados para avaliar o conhecimento dos médicos referentes às situações comuns no cuidado à saúde do idoso, 53,33% (n=8) acertaram quatro ou cinco questões das sete existentes, enquanto 13,33% (n=2) responderam corretamente a seis perguntas e 33,33% (n=5) obtiveram três ou menos acertos. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados evidenciaram alta taxa de prescrição de MPI entre os idosos da Atenção Primária à Saúde, destacando-se os medicamentos que são destinados ao tratamento de doenças do sistema nervoso central. Ressalta-se a importância da educação continuada desses profissionais de saúde e a melhor avaliação de medicamentos incorporados ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e destinados à população geriátrica, sobretudo o idoso polimedicado.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Asistencia a los Ancianos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to analyze factors associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications by elderly people with hypertension. METHOD: a cross-sectional study, conducted in the first semester of 2016, with elderly people undergoing treatment for hypertension, living in the city of Maringá. Interviews, medical records analysis, and measurement of clinical and anthropometric parameters of the participants were carried out. Inferential analysis was used. RESULTS: a total of 260 elderly people who used potentially inappropriate medications participated in the study. The high use of these medications was associated with clinical and anthropometric conditions, such as obesity (p=0.022), smoking (p=0.004), polypharmacy (p=0.034) and the health services provided, such as organizationally accessible treatment (p=0.027) and consultation time (p=0.007), predisposing to low adherence to routine consultations (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: it was shown that the factors associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications were associated with anthropometric, clinical, and organizational variables, intrinsic to the family health strategy.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
When Covid-19 emerged in December last year, there was no vaccine nor was there specific effective treatment for this fast-spreading and life-threatening viral respiratory infection. Clinical trials were planned and are in progress to investigate whether drugs used for influenza, HIV and other viruses, and also anthelmintics (ivermectin, nitazoxanide, niclosamide), and antimalarials (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) showing antiviral activity in in vitro assays, are effective and safe for Covid-19. So far there is no convincing evidence that these antiviral and antiparasitic drugs are of any benefit for Covid-19. Notwithsanding the absence of evidence of clinical efficacy, these drugs are widely used outside of clinical trials (off label) for prophylaxis and treatment of this viral infection. The rationale behind the prescription of macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin) for Covid-19 is obscure as well. The widespread prescription and use of drugs of unproven efficacy and safety for Covid-19 is at odds with the rational use of medicines, a cornerstone principle of pharmacotherapy advanced by WHO in 1985. This irrational use of drugs is cause for concern because some of them are associated with serious heart disorders and deaths.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The rational use of antibiotics (ATB) implies that patients receive those adequate for their clinical needs, in correct doses according to their individual conditions, during an adequate period of time, and at the lowest cost for them and their community. The highest rate of ATB abuse occurs during the perinatal period, despite the fact that there is evidence of multiple short- and long-term negative effects. Furthermore, this abuse is associated with increased costs of medical care. OBJECTIVE: To update and report the evidence on the use, abuse, and adverse effects of ATB in perinatal medicine, and possible measures to prevent them, and thus improve health care outcomes and costs. METHODS: A review and analysis was performed from the literature related to the use of ATB in perinatal medicine up to February 2020. RESULTS: ATB abuse in perinatal medicine ranges from 50% to 70%, with even higher rates in some neonatal centres. Adverse effects include death, increased microbial resistance, along with microbiome abnormalities and dysbiosis that lead to serious life-long complications such as infections, allergies, autoimmune disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, arthritis, asthma, obesity, and perhaps cancer. Preventing and reducing the abuse of ATB would lead to better health and to significant savings in the health sector. In only 4neonatal intensive care units, with 1000 admissions per year, savings are estimated at US$230,000 per year. CONCLUSION: The need to optimise the use of ATB in perinatal medicine has never been more urgent.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin remains one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in NICUs despite recommendations to limit its use for known resistant infections. Baseline data revealing substantially higher vancomycin use in our NICU compared to peer institutions informed our quality improvement initiative. Our aim was to reduce the vancomycin prescribing rate in neonates hospitalized in our NICU by 50% within 1 year and sustain for 1 year. METHODS: In the 60-bed level IV NICU of an academic referral center, we used a quality improvement framework to develop key drivers and interventions including (1) physician education with benchmarking antibiotic prescribing rates; (2) pharmacy-initiated 48-hour antibiotic time-outs on rounds; (3) development of clinical pathways to standardize empirical antibiotic choices for early-onset sepsis, late-onset sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis; coupled with (4) daily prospective audit with feedback from the antimicrobial stewardship program. RESULTS: We used statistical process u-charts to show vancomycin use declined from 112 to 38 days of therapy per 1000 patient-days. After education, pharmacy-initiated 48-hour time-outs, and development of clinical pathways, vancomycin use declined by 29%, and by an additional 52% after implementation of prospective audit with feedback. Vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury also declined from 1.4 to 0.1 events per 1000 patient-days. CONCLUSIONS: Through a sequential implementation approach of education, standardization of care with clinical pathways, pharmacist-initiated 48-hour time-outs, and prospective audit with feedback, vancomycin days of therapy declined by 66% over a 1-year period and has been sustained for 1 year.
Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/organización & administración , Brasil , Vías Clínicas , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Introduction: There is evidence of the indiscriminate use of antibiotics for different pathologies. Objective: To determine the prescription patterns and indications for the use of fluoroquinolones in a group of outpatients in Colombia. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive pharmaco-epidemiological study on prescription-indication using a population database where patients with outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions were included from May to October, 2018. We obtained the information on sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables, as well as on the diagnosis according to the International Classification of Diseases, version 10, and we established if the use was approved by the regulatory agencies or if it was off-label. Results: A total of 23,373 patients were identified who were using fluoroquinolones; their mean age was 47.9 ± 18.1 years and women predominated (n=15,767, 67.5%). Ciprofloxacin was the medication most commonly prescribed (n=19,328, 82.7%), followed by norfloxacin (n=3076, 13.2%), levofloxacin (n=573, 2.5%), and moxifloxacin (n=394; 1.7%). The main indications were urinary tract infection in unspecified site (n=10,777, 46.1%), diarrhea and gastroenteritis of presumed infectious origin (n=3077, 13.2%), and acute cystitis (n=956; 4.2%). The prescriptions followed approved indications in 76% (n=17,759) of cases while the rest were used off-label or without indication for nasopharyngitis or soft-tissue infections, for example. Being male (OR=1.26, 95%CI:1.18-1.34) and under 35 years of age (OR=1.92, 95%CI:1.48-1.50) were associated with a greater probability of using fluoroquinolones in unapproved indications. Conclusions: Fluoroquinolones, particularly ciprofloxacin, are being prescribed especially to women with urinary tract infections, but up to a quarter of the patients received them for unapproved indications by regulatory agencies.
Introducción. Existen evidencias sobre el uso indiscriminado de antibióticos en el tratamiento de diversas enfermedades. Objetivo. Determinar los patrones de prescripción y de indicaciones de uso de las fluoroquinolonas en un grupo de pacientes ambulatorios en Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo farmacoepidemiológico del tipo de prescripción e indicaciones de uso a partir de una base de datos poblacionales que incluía pacientes con prescripciones ambulatorias de fluoroquinolonas entre mayo y octubre de 2018. Se recabó la información sobre las variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y clínicas (diagnóstico según la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades, versión 10) y se estableció la proporción del uso de fluoroquinolonas en indicaciones aprobadas y no aprobadas por las agencias reguladoras. Resultados. Se identificaron 23.373 pacientes que habían recibido fluoroquinolonas; su edad media era de 47,9 ± 18,1 años y 15.767 eran mujeres (67,5 %). La ciprofloxacina fue el medicamento más prescrito (n=19.328; 82,7 %), seguida de la norfloxacina (n=3.076; 13,2 %), la levofloxacina (n=573; 2,5 %) y la moxifloxacina (n=394; 1,7 %). Las principales indicaciones fueron la infección de las vías urinarias en sitio no especificado (n=10.777; 46,1 %), la diarrea y la gastroenteritis de presunto origen infeccioso (n=3.077, 13,2 %) y la cistitis aguda (n=956; 4,2 %). El 76 % (n=17.759) de las prescripciones correspondía a indicaciones aprobadas y el resto a usos no aprobados, como la rinofaringits o las infecciones de tejidos blandos. El ser hombre (odds ratio, OR=1,26; IC95%: 1,18-1,34) y tener menos de 35 años (OR=1,92; IC95%:1,48-1,50) se asociaron con una mayor probabilidad de uso de fluoroquinolonas en indicaciones no aprobadas. Conclusión. Las fluoroquinolonas, en particular la ciprofloxacina, se están prescribiendo especialmente a mujeres con infecciones de las vías urinarias, pero hasta la cuarta parte de los pacientes las recibieron para usos no aprobados por las agencias reguladoras.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Colombia , Cistitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Población Urbana , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Background Potentially inappropriate medications for older adults are those that offer more risks than benefits for this population. Such medications found in older adults' prescriptions across the world are associated with higher rates of comorbidities and hospitalizations, along with high expenditure on healthcare resources. Objectives To estimate the frequency of older adults using potentially inappropriate medications according to four different criteria, to identify factors associated with the use of such medicines and differences between the tools. Setting A primary healthcare unit linked to a university hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Method This was a cross-sectional study conducted via data collection from the electronic medical records of 390 older adults. The information collected comprised sex, age, chronic diseases diagnosed and medications used. The dependent variable of the study was the use of at least one potentially inappropriate medication, according to the following criteria: Beers, Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP), Brazilian consensus and Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS). Main outcome measurement Prevalence of inappropriate medication, differences between the tools and associated factors. Results: The use of at least one potentially inappropriate medication was found in 55.1% of the sample according to the Beers criterion, 51.3% according to the Brazilian consensus, 42.6% according to STOPP and 23.6% according to ARS. It was also seen that 14.9% of the studied population was exposed to a very strong anticholinergic risk. Depending on which tools were used, the agreement observed between the criteria was considered high, moderate, or low. Regarding the four criteria, the use of potentially inappropriate medication is associated with polypharmacy, the diagnosis of three or more chronic diseases and the presence of neuropsychiatric and musculoskeletal diseases. Conclusion Among the older adult population studied, the prevalence of potentially anappropriate medication is high, according to the four different classification criteria used. As a more specific tool, the agreement between Anticholinergic Risk Scale and other criteria was lower, but it can be an important complement to other lists.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples , Polifarmacia , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze clinical and demographic variables possibly associated with the prescriptions of non-recommended but routinely used therapies for infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study included hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis caused by the respiratory syncytial virus. Those with other associated infections and/or morbidities were excluded. The data were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Among 120 cases, 90% used inhaled beta-agonists, 72.5% corticosteroids, 40% antibiotics, and 66.7% inhaled hypertonic saline solution. The use of bronchodilators did not present an independent association with another variable. More frequent use of corticosteroids was associated with low oximetry, longer hospitalization time, and age>3 months. Antibiotic therapy was associated with the presence of fever, longer hospitalization, and age>3 months. Inhaled hypertonic saline solution was associated with longer hospitalization time. CONCLUSIONS: Non-recommended prescriptions were frequent. Corticosteroid and antibiotic therapy were associated with signs of severity, as expected, but interestingly, they were more frequently used in infants above 3m, which suggested less safety in the diagnosis of viral bronchiolitis in these patients. The use of bronchodilators was even more worrying since they were indiscriminately used, without association with another variable related to the severity or characteristics of the host. The use of the inhaled hypertonic solution, although not associated with severity, seems to have implied a longer hospitalization time. The identification of these conditions of greater vulnerability to the prescription of inappropriate therapies contributes to the implantation of protocols for the bronchiolitis treatment, for continuing education and for analysis of the effectiveness of the strategies employed.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Solución Salina Hipertónica/administración & dosificación , Estadísticas no ParamétricasRESUMEN
Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory and systemic disease that primarily affects the skin, nails, and joints. Some medications have been linked to worsening clinical manifestations of cutaneous psoriasis. Objective To identify pharmacological treatments and drugs related to worsening dermatological lesions in patients with psoriasis. Setting Patients diagnosed with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis between November 1, 2018, and October 30, 2019. Methods This was a cross-sectional study from a population database that identified the prescriptions of patients with psoriasis during 2019. All medications prescribed for the treatment of psoriasis and other comorbidities were investigated. Main outcome measure Potentially inappropriate medications. Results We identified 2088 patients with psoriasis, with a mean age of 53.6 ± 15.5 years, and 52.9% were men. A total of 92.6% received pharmacological treatment, and of these, topical corticosteroids were the most commonly used group (76.6%). A total of 55.3% of patients with cutaneous psoriasis received at least one drug associated with worsening dermatological lesions. The most frequent were naproxen (25.5%), diclofenac (14.7%), and dexamethasone (10.8%). Residing in Barranquilla (odds ratio 1.27, 95%confidence interval 1.009-1.607), having any chronic comorbidities (odds ratio 1.94, 95%confidence interval 1.566-2.402), and having a history of coronary heart disease (odds ratio 6.25, 95%confidence interval 1.895-20.645) increased the probability of receiving these prescriptions. Conclusions The pharmacological treatment of psoriasis was in accordance with the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines, but the high proportion of potentially inappropriate prescriptions makes it necessary to promote educational and pharmacovigilance strategies that improve the formulation habits of the physicians involved in the treatment of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate use and increase of health care spending reinforce the need to extend our knowledge about the quality of medication use. OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate the profile of medication use in a representative sample of adult users of primary care services in the Unified Health System (SUS) of Minas Gerais. METHOD: Cross-sectional study, with 1,159 interviewees in 104 municipalities and 253 health care services. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, health conditions and use of medicines were collected, and these variables were stratified by age group. Univariate and multivariate analyses, using logistic regression, were conducted to identify predictors of self-medication. We set a significance level of 5% for all tests. RESULTS: The prevalence of medication use was 81.8%, with an average of 2.67 medicines per user, which increased with age. The most used drugs were losartan, hydrochlorothiazide and simvastatin, which differed between age groups. Significant self-medication was observed not only in young adults but also in the elderly. The predictors of self-medication were: being a young adult, having a higher level of education, not having chronic diseases, having worse self-perception of health and not adhering to prescription drugs. Young and elderly adults showed characteristics that made them more vulnerable in relation to the rational use of medicines. CONCLUSION: This study can contribute to improving primary care, where it identified problems related to the extent of medication use, especially among young adults and the elderly in Minas Gerais.