RESUMEN
Antibiotics are often prescribed inappropriately, either when they are not needed or with an unnecessarily broad spectrum of activity. This is a serious problem that can lead to the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study was conducted to assess the antibiotic prescribing pattern in pediatric patients hospitalized at a quaternary hospital in Nampula, Mozambique, using the WHO indicators and Framework as a reference. A retrospective study was conducted using secondary data obtained from medical records. The study population consisted of children aged 0-10 years who were hospitalized in a quaternary-level hospital ward in Nampula, Mozambique. The pattern of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed using indicators and the WHO classification of antibiotics into AWaRe categories. Descriptive statistics were applied. A total of 464 antibiotics were prescribed during the study. The age groups of 1-3 years and 28 days-12 months were prescribed more antibiotics. The most common antibiotics were ceftriaxone and crystallized penicillin, which were frequently prescribed for patients suffering from bronchopneumonia, gastroenteritis, and malaria. 74.8% of the antibiotics prescribed belonged to the Access group, while 23.7% belonged to the Watch group. There were no prescriptions of antibiotics from the Reserve group. The average number of antibiotics per prescription was 1.51 (SD ± 0.725). The percentage of antibiotic prescribing was 97.5%, with 96.20% by injection. All antibiotics prescribed were on the essential medicines list and prescribed by generic name. These results are concerning and highlight the urgency of strengthening antimicrobial optimization measures, as well as implementing the AWaRe framework in antibiotic prescribing as an essential strategy to combat AMR.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Mozambique , Lactante , Preescolar , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed to treat anxiety and insomnia, but long-term use has been associated with the development of dependence, tolerance, and cognitive decline, especially among older adults. This study aimed to investigate the pattern of consumption and factors associated with inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines in primary health care. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analytical study, using dispensing records of diazepam, clonazepam, and nitrazepam from public pharmacies in a Brazilian municipality between 2018 and 2022. Metrics for benzodiazepine consumption were DDD (Defined Daily Dose) and DDD/1000PD (per 1000 population per day). Long-term/prolonged benzodiazepine use was defined as consuming at least 90 DDD and at least 2 dispensations per year. To ascertain associations between long-term use and predictor variables, a multivariate logistic regression model was utilized. FINDINGS: A total of 40402 participants were included, with an average age of 55 years (SD = 0.30), 38.5% were older aged. Diazepam and nitrazepam exceeded the daily dose recommended. There was a reduction in diazepam consumption during the study period, as calculated by DDD/1.000PD, while the consumption of other benzodiazepines remained stable. However, a significant increase in diazepam consumption is noted when considering the last decade. Prolonged use was observed in 29.1% of participants, with a significant prevalence among the older people (34.8% of them were long-term users) and advancing age was identified as a risk factor for long-term use. Higher PDDs were also associated with long-term use and aging. Participants who used different benzodiazepines during the period had a higher risk of prolonged use. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insights into the prevalence of problematic utilization of benzodiazepines in primary health care. Authorities and health care providers must take steps to encourage gradual cessation of prolonged benzodiazepine prescriptions and the embrace of suitable strategies for addressing anxiety and insomnia within primary health care settings.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Prescripción Inadecuada , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Brasil , Adulto , Diazepam/uso terapéutico , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Nitrazepam/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Clonazepam/uso terapéutico , Clonazepam/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been documented that NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs) reduce the effectiveness of some antihypertensive drugs. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the prescription of NSAID and the variables associated in outpatients with hypertension and explore some characteristics of the physicians. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study, included patients with hypertension from the Family Medicine Unit No. 24 in Mante, Tamaulipas. From the patients, sociodemographic data, clinical history and pharmacological treatments were obtained. From the physicians, sociodemographic and academic information were collected. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 63 ± 11 years and 31.7% were prescribed NSAIDs. When compare exposed versus non-exposed to NSAIDs, being in uncontrolled high blood pressure, uncontrolled hypertension, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The variables associated to the prescription of NSAIDs were: uncontrolled hypertension, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The 56.7% of the physicians were women, 83.3% with experience >10 years and 33.3% with current certification by the Council in Family Medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriate prescription of NSAIDs revealed the need to implement actions to mitigate the potential risk for the hypertension patients to present a complication.
ANTECEDENTES: Los antiinflamatorios y los antirreumáticos no esteroideos (AINE) disminuyen la eficacia de algunos antihipertensivos. OBJETIVO: Analizar el patrón de prescripción de AINE y las variables asociadas en pacientes ambulatorios con diagnóstico de hipertensión arterial, así como explorar algunas características de los médicos prescriptores. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal de pacientes con hipertensión de la Unidad de Medicina Familiar 24 en Ciudad Mante, Tamaulipas. De los pacientes se registraron datos sociodemográficos, antecedentes patológicos y tratamientos farmacológicos; y de los médicos, información sociodemográfica y académica. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 63 ± 11 años, 31.7 % recibía AINE y al contrastarlos con quienes no los recibían, se identificó mayor proporción de obesidad, presión arterial más elevada, más casos en descontrol de la hipertensión arterial, multimorbilidad y polimedicación. Las variables asociadas a la prescripción de AINE fueron estar en descontrol de la hipertensión arterial, multimorbilidad y polimedicación; 56.7 % de los médicos prescriptores fue del sexo femenino, 83.3 % con antigüedad superior a 10 años y 33.3 % con certificación vigente. CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción inapropiada de AINE reveló la necesidad de implementar acciones para mitigar el riesgo potencial de los pacientes hipertensos de presentar una complicación.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Antirreumáticos , Hipertensión , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Polifarmacia , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Introduction: Medications are a fundamental part of the treatment of multiple pathologies. However, despite their benefits, some are considered potentially inappropriate medications for older people given their safety profile. Epidemiological data differences related to potentially inappropriate medications make it difficult to determine their effects on elderly people. Objective: To estimate the prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate medications using the 2019 Beers Criteria® in a cohort of adults older than 65 years. Materials and methods: We performed an observational, multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study of a four-year follow-up of potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older adults. Results: We followed 820 participants from five cities for four years (2012-2016) and evaluated them in three different moments (m1 = 2012, m2 = 2014, and m3 = 2016). The average age was 69.07 years, and 50.9% were women. The potentially inappropriate medication prevalence in the participants was 40.24%. The potentially inappropriate medications' mean among the studied subjects in the first moment was 1.65 (SD = 0.963), in the second was 1.73 (SD = 1.032), and in the third was 1.62 (SD = 0.915). There were no statistical differences between measurements (Friedman test, value = 0.204). The most frequent potentially inappropriate medications categories were gastrointestinal (39.4%), analgesics (18.8%), delirium-related drugs (15.4%), benzodiazepines (15.2%), and cardiovascular (14.2%). Conclusions: About half of the population of the community-dwelling older adults had prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications in a sustained manner and without significant variability over time. Mainly potentially inappropriate medications were gastrointestinal and cardiovascular drugs, analgesics, delirium-related drugs, and benzodiazepines.
Introducción. Los fármacos son parte fundamental del tratamiento de múltiples enfermedades. Sin embargo, a pesar de sus beneficios, algunos se consideran medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en adultos mayores, dado su perfil de seguridad. Las diferencias en los datos epidemiológicos relacionados con los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados dificultan el establecimiento de sus efectos en adultos mayores. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia longitudinal y los tipos de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados, utilizando los criterios Beers® del 2019 en una cohorte de adultos mayores de 65 años. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo y longitudinal, de cuatro años de seguimiento de los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en adultos mayores de la comunidad. Resultados. Se evaluaron 820 participantes de cinco ciudades durante cuatro años (2012 a 2016) en tres momentos (m1: 2012, m2: 2014 y m3; 2016). La edad promedio fue de 69,07 años y el 50,9 % eran mujeres. La prevalencia de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados en los participantes fue del 40,24 %. El promedio de estos medicamentos entre los sujetos estudiados en el primer momento fue de 1,65 (DE = 0,963), en el segundo fue de 1,73 (DE = 1,032) y en el tercero fue de 1,62 (DE = 0,915). No hubo diferencias estadísticas entre las mediciones (prueba de Friedman, p = 0,204). Las categorías de los medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados más frecuentes fueron: gastrointestinales (39,4 %), analgésicos (18,8 %), relacionados con delirium (15,4 %), benzodiacepinas (15,2 %) y cardiovasculares (14,2 %). Conclusiones. En cerca de la mitad de la población de adultos mayores de la comunidad, se prescribieron medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados de manera sostenida y sin variabilidad importante en el tiempo. Los más recetados fueron aquellos para tratar malestares gastrointestinales y cardiovasculares, analgésicos, para el delirium y benzodiacepinas.
Asunto(s)
Vida Independiente , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and the risk of death among community-dwelling older Brazilian adults. METHODS: Participants from the Health, Well-Being, and Aging Cohort Study (SABE) in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2000 and 2016 were included. The dependent variable was all-cause mortality, measured as the time elapsed until death. The exposure of interest was the use of PIM according to the Beers Criteria 2019 version. All covariates, except for sex and education, were considered time-varying. RESULTS: PIM use was not associated with mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.88-1.12). There was a significant interaction between PIM use and age (HR = 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSION: The association between PIM use and the risk of death was moderated by age. Future studies should consider the impact of necessary medication omissions when assessing the mortality risk associated with PIM use.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Brasil , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Vida Independiente , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripción Inadecuada , Mortalidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
O uso indiscriminado de psicotrópicos tem importância econômica, social e requer atenção dos profissionais de saúde. Nessa perspectiva, a pesquisa tem como objetivo avaliar a prescrição e o perfil de utilização de psicotrópicos na Farmácia Básica do município de Catolé do Rocha/PB. O presente estudo é transversal, quantitativo do tipo descritivo. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de questionários aplicados no período de abril a maio de 2021. Foram entrevistados 200 usuários, selecionados com base em critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Os resultados apontaram a prevalência do sexo feminino (63,0%), casados (53,5%), residentes da zona urbana (70,5%), baixa escolaridade (56,5%) e aposentados (44,5%). Em suma, as prescrições eram obtidas em UBS (81,0%) por queixas de ansiedade (24,0%) e insônia (23,5%). Observou-se maior frequência de prescrição para clonazepam (18,6%) e alprazolam (15,9%), ambos considerados MPI. Estes foram prescritos principalmente por clínicos gerais (71,8%). Assim, evidencia-se a importância do farmacêutico na APS, tanto na sensibilização dos prescritores com relação à escolha e prescrição adequada destes medicamentos quanto na orientação dos pacientes com vistas à promoção do uso racional de psicotrópicos.
The use of psychotropic drugs has economic and social importance and requires attention from health professionals. he objective of this research was to evaluate the prescription and the profile of use of psychotropic drugs in the Basic Pharmacy in the municipality of Catolé do Rocha/PB. This is a cross-sectional, quantitative, descriptive study. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires applied from April to May 2021. Two hundred users were interviewed, selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results showed a prevalence of females (63.0%), married (53.5%), residing in the urban area (70.5%), with low education (56.5%), and retired (44.5%). The prescriptions were obtained at the Basic Health Unit (81.0%) for complaints of anxiety (24.0%) and insomnia (23.5%). We observed a higher frequency of prescriptions for clonazepam (18.6%) and alprazolam (15.9%), both considered potential inappropriate drugs. These were mainly prescribed by general practitioners (71.8%). Thus, the importance of pharmacists in Primary Health Care is evident both to increase the awareness among prescribers regarding the choice and proper prescription of medications and to guide patients with a view to promoting the rational use of psychotropic drugs.
Asunto(s)
Perfil de Salud , Prescripción InadecuadaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Older adults with advanced chronic diseases and palliative care needs are more exposed to polypharmacy and use of potentially inappropriate medication, which generates a high risk of adverse events and impaired quality of life. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with palliative care needs receiving home care services after hospital discharge. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of pharmacy dispensing and electronic health records, of older adults in a home care system and with palliative care needs according to the screening with the NECPAL tool or the PROFUND and/or PALIAR indexes. Dispensed medications during 180 days after admission to home care were analyzed. Medications were classified as potentially inappropriate according to the LESS-CHRON criteria. RESULTS: We included 176 patients, mean age 87.4 years, 67% were women; 73% were pluripathologic patients and 22% had one chronic progressive disease. Mortality at 6 months was 73%. Median frequency of dispensed medications per patient was 9.1 (IQR = 4-9.7). The frequency of potentially inappropriate medication dispensation among patients was 87%, mainly antihypertensives, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: This study observed that dispensation of potentially inappropriate medication among older adults with palliative care needs and home care services is very high. This emphasizes the need for effective patient-centered interventions to prevent inadequate prescription and stimulate de-prescription.
Introducción: Los adultos mayores con enfermedades crónicas avanzadas y necesidad de cuidados paliativos están más expuestos a la polifarmacia y a consumir medicación potencialmente inapropiada, la cual genera un alto riesgo de eventos adversos y alteración de la calidad de vida. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la frecuencia de consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada de adultos mayores con necesidad de cuidados paliativos que ingresaron a cuidados domiciliarios luego de una hospitalización. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal observacional de registros de dispensación e historias clínicas electrónicas, de adultos mayores en un sistema de cuidados domiciliarios y con necesidades de cuidados paliativos según el rastreo con la herramienta NECPAL, los índices PROFUND y/o PALIAR. Se analizó el consumo de fármacos durante los 180 días posteriores al ingreso a cuidados domiciliarios. Se clasificaron los fármacos como potencialmente inapropiados según criterios de LESS-CHRON. Resultados: Se incluyeron 176 pacientes, edad promedio 87.4 años, 67% mujeres; 78% eran pluripatológicos y 22% presentaban una enfermedad única crónica progresiva. La mortalidad a los 6 meses fue 73%. La mediana de consumo de fármacos por paciente fue 9.1 (RIC = 4-9.7). El 87% consumía medicación potencialmente inapropiada, principalmente antihipertensivos, benzodiacepinas y antipsicóticos. Conclusión: Este estudio observó que los adultos mayores, con necesidad de cuidados paliativos en cuidados domiciliarios, tienen un alto consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada. Esto refuerza la necesidad de implementar intervenciones efectivas centradas en el paciente, para prevenir la prescripción inadecuada y estimular la de-prescripción.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Prescripción Inadecuada , Cuidados Paliativos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Polifarmacia , Enfermedad Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
This study is a systematic literature review of the association between lists of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) in clinical practice and health outcomes of older adults followed up in primary health care. For this purpose, the PRISMA protocol was used to systematize the search for articles in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central, LIVIVO and LILACS databases, in addition to the gray literature. Studies with randomized clinical trials were selected, using explicit criteria (lists) for the identification and management of PIM in prescriptions of older patients in primary care. Of the 2,400 articles found, six were used for data extraction. The interventions resulted in significant reductions in the number of PIM and adverse drug events and, consequently, in potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) in polymedicated older adults. However, there were no significant effects of the interventions on negative clinical outcomes, such as emergency room visits, hospitalizations and death, or on improving the health status of the older adults. The use of PIM lists promotes adequate medication prescriptions for older adults in primary health care, but further studies are needed to determine the impact of reducing PIM on primary clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , PolifarmaciaRESUMEN
Objetivo: Analisar o uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPIs) e o uso de medicamentos usados em terapia de suporte que requerem cautela em idosos com câncer (MTSRCICs), determinando os fatores associados. Visou-se também determinar a concordância entre os critérios explícitos empregados na identificação de MPI. Metodologia: Estudo transversal com indivíduos com mieloma múltiplo (MM), idade ≥ 60 anos em tratamento ambulatorial. Os MPI foram identificados de acordo com os critérios AGS Beers 2019, PRISCUS 2.0 e o Consenso Brasileiro de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados (CBMPI). Os MTSRCIC foram definidos de acordo com a National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Os fatores associados ao uso de MPI e MTSRCIC foram identificados por regressão logística múltipla. O grau de concordância entre os três critérios explícitos empregados no estudo foi mensurado pelo coeficiente kappa Cohen. Resultados: As frequências de MPI foram 52,29% (AGS Beers 2019), 62,74% (CBMPI), 65,36% (PRISCUS 2.0) e 52,29% (MTSRCICs). As concordâncias entre AGS Beers 2019 com PRISCUS 2,0 e com CBMPI foram altas, enquanto a concordância entre CBMPI e PRISCUS 2.0 foi excelente. No modelo final de regressão logística polifarmácia foi associada positivamente ao uso de MPI por idosos para os três critérios explícitos utilizados, além de associado à utilização de MTSRCICs. Conclusões: A frequência do uso de MPI e de MTSRCIC foi elevada. A concordância em relação ao uso de MPI entre os critérios AGS Beers 2019, CBMPI e PRISCUS 2.0 foi alta ou excelente. A polifarmácia apresentou associação independente e positiva com uso de MPIs e de MTSRCICs por pacientes idosos com MM. (AU)
Objectives: To analyze the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and medications used in supportive therapy that require caution in older adults with cancer, in addition to determining associated factors the agreement between criteria sets used to identify PIMs. Methods: This cross-sectional study included individuals with multiple myeloma aged ≥ 60 years who were undergoing outpatient treatment. PIMs were identified according to American Geriatric Society Beers 2019, PRISCUS 2.0, and Brazilian Consensus on Potentially Inappropriate Medicines criteria. Medications of concern were defined according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Factors associated with the use of PIMs and medications of concern were identified using multiple logistic regression. The degree of agreement between the 3 criteria sets was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: The frequency of PIM use was 52.29% according to American Geriatric Society Beers criteria, 62.74% according to Brazilian Consensus criteria, and 65.36% according to PRISCUS criteria, while 52.29% of the patients were using medications of concern. Agreement between American Geriatric Society Beers, PRISCUS, and Brazilian Consensus criteria was high, while it was excellent between Brazilian Consensus and PRISCUS criteria. In the final logistic regression model, polypharmacy was associated with PIM use according to each criteria set, as well as the use of medications of concern. Conclusions: The frequency of PIMs and medications of concern was high. Agreement about PIM use between the American Geriatric Society Beers, Brazilian Consensus, and PRISCUS criteria was high or excellent. There was an independent association between polypharmacy and the use of PIMs and medications of concern by older patients with multiple myeloma. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prescripción Inadecuada , Mieloma MúltipleRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elderly people have multiple comorbidities that often require treatment with multiple medications. Having strategies to lessen the risks associated with pharmacological interactions and potentially inadequate prescribing (PIP) is of major importance. The STOPP- START criteria are useful in identifying PIP along with other tools, such as LASA (look alike/sound alike) drugs and high-risk medications (HRM). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clinically and sociodemographically characterize the population with PIP according to the STOPP-START criteria in hospitalized elderly patients over 6 months in a third-level hospital in Colombia, South America. We also aimed to calculate the prevalence of PIP, LASA drugs and HRM and to identify other problems related with medication. Finally, we proposed an algorithm for the identification of PIP in this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study in hospitalized patients older than 60 years during the first semester of 2021 to identify PIP according to STOPP- START criteria. An analysis of clinical and sociodemographic variables was conducted, as well as the construction of an algorithm to identify PIP in the elderly in a semiautomated way. Data were collected and analyzed using the software SPSS 2021, using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency. RESULTS: The prevalence of PIP in the study population was 25%. Furthermore, 60% of patients had one problem related to medication, and 27% used at least one LASA drug or HRM. CONCLUSION: This study allows one to characterize, for the first time, the Colombian population prone to PIP, as well as the construction of an algorithm that identifies PIP in a semiautomated way.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Prescripción Inadecuada , Humanos , Anciano , Colombia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Prevalencia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGOUND: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has been evaluated in several countries, and several strategies have been devised for deprescribing drugs in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile application in reducing PIP for older adults in primary care facilities in Brazil. METHODS: This randomised, triple-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted in 22 public primary care facilities in Brazil. During the intervention phase, the general practitioners (GPs) were randomly allocated to the intervention (MPI Brasil app provides information about PIP, therapeutic alternatives and deprescribing) or control (MedSUS app provides general information about medications) group. All GPs were trained on the Clinical Decision-Making Process and how to access an Evidence-Based Health website. The GPs received an Android tablet with an installed mobile application depending on their allocated group, which they used when caring for older patients over at least 3 months. At the end of this period, a sample of older patients aged ≥ 60 years who had been awaiting medical consultation by the participating GPs were interviewed and their prescriptions analysed. The primary outcome was the frequency of PIP in and between the groups. RESULTS: Among 53 GPs who were administered the baseline survey, 14 were included in the clinical trial. At baseline, 146 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 37.7% (55/146), in the intervention group was 40.6% (28/69), and in the control group was 35.1% (27/77). After the intervention, 284 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 31.7% (90/284), in the intervention group was 32.2% (46/143), and in the control group was 31.2% (44/141) (RR: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76-1.76). In the within-group analysis, the PIP reduced from before to after the intervention in both groups-more significantly in the intervention than in the control group (p < 0.001). In the stratified analysis of PIP frequency by GPs, there was a relative risk reduction in 86% (6/7) of GPs in the intervention group compared to 71% (5/7) in the control group. CONCLUSION: We found that the MPI Brasil app effectively reduced PIP, suggesting that it may be useful to incorporate this tool into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02918643). First registration on 22/09/2016.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Aplicaciones Móviles , Humanos , Anciano , Brasil/epidemiología , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (nâ¯=â¯1050), conducting title/abstract screening (nâ¯=â¯4741), and full reading (nâ¯=â¯41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75â¯years or older (nâ¯=â¯130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.
Asunto(s)
Deprescripciones , Cuidados Paliativos , Anciano , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Polifarmacia , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by two independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Out of the 5,791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1,050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4,741), and full reading (n = 41), only one study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to two groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only one of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.
Asunto(s)
Deprescripciones , Humanos , Anciano , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Polifarmacia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to identify the prevalence and associations of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with hypertension treated in primary care. METHODS: a cross-sectional study carried out with older adults with hypertension treated at a Family Health Strategy unit. Data collection included analysis of medical records, interviews and multidimensional assessment of older adults. Socio-demographic information and clinical variables were collected. Statistical analysis was performed by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: polypharmacy prevalence was 38.09%, and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), 28.57%. There was a significant association between polypharmacy and PIM use, altered sleep and ethnicity. PIM use was associated with polypharmacy, worse family functioning, and absence of a caregiver. Cognitive decline reduces the prevalence of these medications. CONCLUSIONS: polypharmacy and PIM use among older adults with hypertension represent a problem in this population, especially among the most vulnerable.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Prescripción Inadecuada , Polifarmacia , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Riesgo , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medication use is prevalent among older adults in primary care, leading to increased morbidity, adverse drug reactions, hospitalizations, and mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool for identifying PIMs in older adults within the primary care setting. The tool is composed of a list of criteria and was created based on consensus among experts from three Spanish-speaking countries, including two from Latin America. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to identify existing tools, and prescription patterns were evaluated in a cohort of 36,111 older adults. An electronic Delphi method, consisting of two rounds, was used to reach a formal expert consensus. The panel included 18 experts from Spain, Colombia, and Argentina. The content validity index, validity of each content item, and Kappa Fleiss statistical measure were used to establish reliability. RESULTS: Round one did not yield a consensus, but a definitive consensus was reached in round two. The resulting tool consisted of a list of 5 general recommendations per disease, along with 33 criteria related to potential problems, recommendations, and alternative therapeutic options. The overall content validity of the tool was 0.87, with a Kappa value of 0.69 (95% CI 0.64-0.73; Substantial). CONCLUSIONS: The developed criteria provide a novel list that allows for a comprehensive approach to pharmacotherapy in older adults, intending to reduce inappropriate medication use, ineffective treatments, prophylactic therapies, and treatments with an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio for the given condition. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of these criteria on health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Deprescripciones , Prescripción Inadecuada , Humanos , Anciano , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , España/epidemiología , Consenso , Argentina/epidemiología , Colombia/epidemiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , PolifarmaciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To map out the studies that have investigated the associations of polypharmacy and/or potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use with physical activity and sedentary time in older adults. METHODS: We conducted a literature search from inception to December 2022 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. INCLUSION CRITERIA: observational studies including older adults (≥60 years); English, Portuguese, and Spanish languages; any definition of polypharmacy; implicit and explicit criteria of PIM use; physical activity and/or sedentary time data. RESULTS: Fourteen cross-sectional studies were included; 11 defined polypharmacy as ≥5 medications (prevalence ranging from 9.5 % to 57 %). No study reported information on PIM use. Most studies included participants aged <80 years. Twelve studies included self-reported measures of physical activity, while two studies used accelerometer-measured physical activity. Ten studies included analyses adjusted for confounders, and nine considered polypharmacy as an outcome. All of them demonstrated an inverse association between physical activity and polypharmacy, irrespective of the definition of polypharmacy and the assessment method employed (self-reported or accelerometry). One study reported an inverse association between polypharmacy (as the exposure) and physical activity (as the outcome). None of the studies investigated the association between sedentary time and polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests an inverse association between physical activity and polypharmacy in older adults. However, the relationship between PIM use, physical activity, and sedentary time remains unknown. Longitudinal studies utilizing objectively-measured physical activity and sedentary time are needed to better clarify the relationship between these movement behaviors and polypharmacy and/or PIM use in older adults.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Polifarmacia , Humanos , Anciano , Conducta Sedentaria , Estudios Transversales , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente InapropiadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in critical care units remains limited, especially in terms of the factors associated with their use. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and factors associated with PIMs use in intensive care units. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study was conducted in a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 314 patients aged ≥ 60 years who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. The dates were extracted from a "Patient Safety Project" database. A Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess which factors were associated with PIMs. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: According to Beers' criteria, 12.8% of the identified drugs were considered inappropriate for the elderly population. The incidence rate of PIMs use was 45.8%. The most frequently used PIMs were metoclopramide, insulin, antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and benzodiazepines. Factors associated with PIMs use were the number of medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17), length of hospital stay (OR = 1.07), and excessive potential drug interactions (OR = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the older adults in ICUs received PIM. Patients taking PIMs had a longer length of stay in the ICU, higher numbers of medications, and higher numbers of potential drug interactions. In ICUs, the use of explicit methods combined with clinical judgment can contribute to the safety and quality of medication prescriptions.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
O artigo tem o objetivo de analisar a produção científica disponível na literatura sobre os eventos adversos em serviços de urgência e emergência. Assim, realizou-se uma revisão integrativa por meio de levantamento bibliográfico em agosto de 2022, com busca nas seguintes bases de dados eletrônicas: Índice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud (Ibecs), Base de Dados em Enfermagem (BDENF) via Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde (BVS), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) via PubMed e Web of Science via Portal de Periódicos da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). A busca resultou na amostra final de dez artigos, que foram descritos com base em quatro eixos temáticos, conforme tipo de serviço e desenvolvimento do estudo. Os assuntos mais abordados nas produções foram: terapia medicamentosa, incidentes relacionados à organização do serviço, falhas nas prescrições, prescrições verbais, incidentes com previsão e provisão de materiais e abastecimento. A análise das produções expõe o maior número de artigos da Espanha, do Brasil e dos Estados Unidos, com ênfase nos assuntos relacionados a eventos adversos em ambientes de urgência e emergência intra-hospitalares, demonstrando que as pesquisas sobre segurança do paciente em serviços de urgência e emergência são incipientes, assim como são escassos os estudos no Brasil voltados para as unidades de pronto atendimento.
The article aims to analyze the scientific production available in the literature on adverse events in urgency and emergency services. Thus, an integrative review was carried out with a bibliographic survey, in August 2022, with a search in the electronical databases: Spanish Bibliographic Index in Health Sciences (IBECS), Database in Nursing (BDENF) via Virtual Health Library (BVS), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed and Web of Science via Portal de Periódicos da Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES). The search resulted in a final sample of ten articles, which were described based on four thematic axes, in accordance with the type of study development and service. The subjects most discussed in the productions were: drug therapy, incidents related to the organization of the service, failures in prescriptions, verbal prescriptions, incidents with prediction, and provision of materials and supplies. The analysis of the productions exposes the larger number of articles from Spain, Brazil, and the United States, with emphasis on subjects related to adverse events in in-hospital urgent and emergency environments, demonstrating that research on patient safety in urgency and emergency services are incipient, as well the few studies in Brazil directed to emergency care units.
Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la producción científica disponible en la literatura sobre eventos adversos en los servicios de urgencias y emergencia. Para ello, se realizó una revisión integradora mediante levantamiento bibliográfico, llevado a cabo en agosto de 2022, con búsqueda en las bases de datos en línea: Índice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud (Ibecs), Base de Datos en Enfermería (BDENF) vía Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS), Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud (Lilacs), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) vía PubMed y Web of Science vía Portal de Periódicos de la Coordinación de Perfeccionamiento de Personal de Nivel Superior (Capes). La búsqueda resultó en una muestra final de diez artículos, descritos a partir de cuatro ejes temáticos, de acuerdo con el tipo de servicio y desarrollo del estudio. Los temas más tratados en las producciones fueron farmacoterapia, incidentes relacionados con la organización del servicio, fallos en la prescripción, prescripción verbal, e incidentes con predicción y provisión de materiales e insumos. El análisis de las producciones expone la mayor cantidad de artículos en España, Brasil y Estados Unidos, con mayor énfasis en temas relacionados con eventos adversos en ambientes de urgencias y emergencia intrahospitalaria, demostrando que la investigación sobre seguridad del paciente en servicios de urgencias y emergencia es incipiente, así como existen pocos estudios en Brasil dirigidos a unidades de atención de emergencia.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), especially those with potential effects on the central nervous system, can increase the risk of cognitive impairment. We investigated the association of the use of PIM and PIM that may impair cognition (PIM-Cog) with cognitive performance among older adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study with 2,626 participants, PIM and PIM-Cog were defined by the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria. We calculated global cognition and memory, verbal fluency, and Trail Making Test B version (TMT-B) z-scores. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables were used to investigate the association between PIM and cognition. RESULTS: 27% and 7% of the sample (mean age = 65.1 ± 4.1 years old, 54% women, and 61% White) used at least one PIM and PIM-cog, respectively. PIM was associated with poor performance in the TMT-B (ß = -0.17, 95% Cl = -0.29; -0.05, p = 0.007). PIM-Cog was also associated with poor TMT-B performance (ß = -0.08, 95% Cl = -0.15; -0.01, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The use of PIM and PIM-Cog was associated with poor executive function among older adults. The review of PIM use and the deprescription of these drugs may be an effective way to improve cognitive function.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Prescripción Inadecuada , Cognición , Disfunción Cognitiva/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate prescription (PIP) constitutes a risk for the development of adverse effects of a drug that outweigh its benefits, which can be considered inappropriate medication use. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of PIP in geriatric patients hospitalized at the internal medicine department of a referral hospital in Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive design, with simple allocation of medical records from patients older than 65 years hospitalized between January 2016 and August 2017. The STOPP/START criteria were applied to identify the number of PIPs, the number of prescribed medications, number and type of comorbidities, as well as days of hospital stay. RESULTS: A prevalence of PIP of 73.3% was identified, with main comorbidities being hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 1,885 prescribed medications were quantified; mean hospital stay was 6.3 days. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of PIP was identified in hospitalized geriatric patients, hence the importance of applying the STOPP/START criteria and of the role of the pharmacist for validating the prescription prior to drug administration.
ANTECEDENTES: Una prescripción potencialmente inapropiada (PPI) constituye un riesgo de presentar efectos adversos por un fármaco que superan los beneficios de este, pudiendo considerarse como uso inadecuado de medicamentos. OBJETIVO: Describir la prevalencia de prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas en pacientes geriátricos hospitalizados en el servicio de medicina interna de un hospital de referencia en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Diseño descriptivo transversal, con asignación simple de expedientes clínicos de pacientes hospitalizados mayores de 65 años, entre enero de 2016 y agosto de 2017. Se aplicaron los criterios STOPP y START para identificar el número de PPI, cantidad de medicamentos prescritos, presencia, cantidad y tipo de comorbilidades, así como días de estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: Se encontró una prevalencia de 73.3 % de PPI y las principales comorbilidades fueron hipertensión arterial y diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Se cuantificaron 1885 medicamentos prescritos; la estancia hospitalaria media fue de 6.3 días. CONCLUSIONES: Se identificó alta prevalencia de PPI en los pacientes geriátricos hospitalizados, de ahí la importancia de aplicar los criterios STOPP y START y del papel del farmacéutico en la validación de la prescripción antes de la administración de medicamentos.