Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares , Prejuicio , Sesgo , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/legislación & jurisprudencia , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares/legislación & jurisprudencia , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares/métodos , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares/normas , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Prejuicio/prevención & control , Prejuicio/tendencias , Organización de la Financiación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Organización de la Financiación/organización & administración , Organización de la Financiación/normas , Organización de la Financiación/tendenciasRESUMEN
In science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, disabled people remain a significantly underrepresented part of the workforce. Recent data suggests that about 20% of undergraduates in the United States have disabilities, but representation in STEM fields is consistently lower than in the general population. Of those earning STEM degrees, only about 10% of undergraduates, 6% of graduate students, and 2% of doctoral students identify as disabled. This suggests that STEM fields have difficulty recruiting and retaining disabled students, which ultimately hurts the field, because disabled scientists bring unique problem-solving perspectives and input. This essay briefly explores the ways in which ableism-prejudice against disabled people based on the assumption that they are "less than" their nondisabled peers-in research contributes to the exclusion of disabled scientists and suggests ways in which the scientific community can improve accessibility and promote the inclusion of disabled scientists in academic science.
Asunto(s)
Prejuicio/ética , Prejuicio/tendencias , Ciencia/educación , Ingeniería/educación , Ingeniería/tendencias , Humanos , Matemática/educación , Matemática/tendencias , Ciencia/tendencias , Estudiantes , Tecnología/educación , Tecnología/tendencias , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Neurocirugia/educación , Neurocirugia/psicología , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Sexismo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neurocirugia/tendencias , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/educación , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/psicología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Prejuicio/psicología , Prejuicio/tendencias , Sexismo/tendenciasRESUMEN
The 'discovery' stage of genome-wide association studies required amassing large, homogeneous cohorts. In order to attain clinically useful insights, we must now consider the presentation of disease within our clinics and, by extension, within our medical records. Large-scale use of electronic health record (EHR) data can help to understand phenotypes in a scalable manner, incorporating lifelong and whole-phenome context. However, extending analyses to incorporate EHR and biobank-based analyses will require careful consideration of phenotype definition. Judgements and clinical decisions that occur 'outside' the system inevitably contain some degree of bias and become encoded in EHR data. Any algorithmic approach to phenotypic characterization that assumes non-biased variables will generate compounded biased conclusions. Here, we discuss and illustrate potential biases inherent within EHR analyses, how these may be compounded across time and suggest frameworks for large-scale phenotypic analysis to minimize and uncover encoded bias.
Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional/métodos , Enfermedad/genética , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Prejuicio/tendencias , Humanos , FenotipoAsunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Prejuicio/psicología , Atención Prenatal/psicología , Atención Prenatal/normas , Servicios de Salud para Mujeres/normas , Salud de la Mujer/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Prejuicio/tendencias , Atención Prenatal/tendencias , Salud de la Mujer/tendencias , Servicios de Salud para Mujeres/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implicit and explicit bias among providers can influence the quality of healthcare. Efforts to address sexual orientation bias in new physicians are hampered by a lack of knowledge of school factors that influence bias among students. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether medical school curriculum, role modeling, diversity climate, and contact with sexual minorities predict bias among graduating students against gay and lesbian people. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 4732 first-year medical students was recruited from a stratified random sample of 49 US medical schools in the fall of 2010 (81% response; 55% of eligible), of which 94.5% (4473) identified as heterosexual. Seventy-eight percent of baseline respondents (3492) completed a follow-up survey in their final semester (spring 2014). MAIN MEASURES: Medical school predictors included formal curriculum, role modeling, diversity climate, and contact with sexual minorities. Outcomes were year 4 implicit and explicit bias against gay men and lesbian women, adjusted for bias at year 1. KEY RESULTS: In multivariate models, lower explicit bias against gay men and lesbian women was associated with more favorable contact with LGBT faculty, residents, students, and patients, and perceived skill and preparedness for providing care to LGBT patients. Greater explicit bias against lesbian women was associated with discrimination reported by sexual minority students (b = 1.43 [0.16, 2.71]; p = 0.03). Lower implicit sexual orientation bias was associated with more frequent contact with LGBT faculty, residents, students, and patients (b = -0.04 [-0.07, -0.01); p = 0.008). Greater implicit bias was associated with more faculty role modeling of discriminatory behavior (b = 0.34 [0.11, 0.57); p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools may reduce bias against sexual minority patients by reducing negative role modeling, improving the diversity climate, and improving student preparedness to care for this population.
Asunto(s)
Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Prejuicio/psicología , Prejuicio/tendencias , Facultades de Medicina/tendencias , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Distribución Aleatoria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To date, most research on perceived discrimination and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has examined racial discrimination although other forms of discrimination may also impact physical and mental health. The current study investigated the relationship between three forms of discrimination (weight, race, and gender) and 3-year incidence of CVD in a large national sample of U.S. adults. METHODS: 26,992 adults (55.5% women) who participated in the 2001-2002 and 2004-2005 National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) were included in this study. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for three forms of perceived discrimination (simultaneously included in equations after adjusting for relevant potential confounds) for predicting CVD incidence at Wave 2. RESULTS: Perceived weight and racial discrimination were associated with significantly greater likelihood of reporting myocardial infarction (OR=2.56 [95% CI=1.31-4.98], OR=1.84 [95% CI=1.19-2.84], respectively) and minor heart conditions (OR=1.48 [95% CI=1.11-1.98], OR=1.41 [95% CI=1.18-1.70], respectively). Perceived racial discrimination was also significantly associated with greater likelihood of reporting arteriosclerosis (OR=1.61 [95% CI=1.11-2.34]). Odds ratios for diagnoses of arteriosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and other minor heart disease were largest for individuals reporting multiple forms of discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Adults who experience weight and racial discrimination, and especially multiple forms of discrimination, may be at heightened risk for CVD. Perceived discrimination may be important to consider during assessment of life stressors by health providers. Future research should address the mechanisms that link discrimination and CVD to assist public health and policy efforts to reduce discrimination.
Asunto(s)
Peso Corporal , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Identidad de Género , Prejuicio/tendencias , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Unión Europea/organización & administración , Cooperación Internacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigadores , Incertidumbre , Emigración e Inmigración/legislación & jurisprudencia , Emigración e Inmigración/tendencias , Unión Europea/economía , Organización de la Financiación/economía , Organización de la Financiación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Biología Molecular , Fusión Nuclear , Política , Prejuicio/prevención & control , Prejuicio/tendencias , Investigadores/economía , Investigadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigadores/organización & administración , Investigadores/psicología , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Telescopios , Desempleo , Reino Unido , Universidades/economía , Universidades/organización & administración , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Trastornos de Combate/rehabilitación , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Perros , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/rehabilitación , Veteranos , Síntomas Afectivos/epidemiología , Síntomas Afectivos/etiología , Síntomas Afectivos/prevención & control , Animales , Humanos , Prejuicio/tendencias , Rehabilitación/ética , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , GuerraRESUMEN
A trust has become the first NHS organisation to be named the best employer for gay, lesbian and bisexual people by the charity Stonewall.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales/normas , Prejuicio/tendencias , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Humanos , Medicina Estatal/normas , Reino Unido , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Bioética/tendencias , Tecnología Biomédica/ética , Tecnología Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Humanos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Humanos/tendencias , Árabes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tecnología Biomédica/tendencias , Predicción , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política , Prejuicio/ética , Prejuicio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prejuicio/tendencias , Naciones Unidas/ética , Naciones Unidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Naciones Unidas/tendencias , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Discusiones Bioéticas , Bioética , Personas con Discapacidad , Prejuicio , Justicia Social , Estereotipo , Bioética/historia , Bioética/tendencias , Ceguera , Conducta Cooperativa , Amigos , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Prejuicio/ética , Prejuicio/historia , Prejuicio/tendencias , Justicia Social/ética , Justicia Social/historia , Justicia Social/tendencias , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many studies have assessed perspectives of medical students toward institutional diversity, but few of them have attempted to map changes in diversity climate over time. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate changes in diversity climate at a Jesuit medical institution over a 12-year period. METHODS: In 1999, 334 medical students completed an anonymous self-administered online survey, and 12 years later, 406 students completed a comparable survey in 2011. Chi-square tests assessed the differences in percent responses to questions of the two surveys, related to three identities: gender, race, and sexual orientation. RESULTS: The 1999 versus 2011 samples were 46% versus 49% female, 61% versus 61% Caucasian, and 41% vs. 39% aged 25 years or older. Findings suggested improvements in medical students' perceptions surrounding equality 'in general' across the three identities (p<0.001); 'in the practice of medicine' based on gender (p<0.001), race/ethnicity (p=0.60), and sexual orientation (p=0.43); as well as in the medical school curriculum, including course text content, professor's delivery and student-faculty interaction (p<0.001) across the three identities. There was a statistically significant decrease in experienced or witnessed events related to gender bias (p<0.001) from 1999 to 2011; however, reported events of bias based on race/ethnicity (p=0.69) and sexual orientation (p=0.58) only showed small decreases. CONCLUSIONS: It may be postulated that the improvement in students' self-perceptions of equality and diversity over the past 12 years may have been influenced by a generational acceptance of cultural diversity and, the inclusion of diversity training courses within the medical curriculum. Diversity training related to race and sexual orientation should be expanded, including a follow-up survey to assess the effectiveness of any intervention.
Asunto(s)
Catolicismo , Prejuicio/tendencias , Facultades de Medicina/tendencias , Universidades/tendencias , Adulto , Diversidad Cultural , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Raciales , Factores Sexuales , SexualidadRESUMEN
The stigmatization of some groups of people, whether for some characteristic they possess or some behavior they engage in, will initially strike most of us as wrong. For many years, academic work in public health, which focused mainly on the stigmatization of HIV-positive individuals, reinforced this natural reaction to stigmatization, by pointing out the negative health effects of stigmatization. But more recently, the apparent success of anti-smoking campaigns which employ stigmatization of smokers has raised questions about whether stigmatization may sometimes be justified, because of its positive effects on public health. Discussion of the issue so far has focused on consequences, and on some Kantian considerations regarding the status of the stigmatized. In this article, I argue that further Kantian considerations regarding the treatment of the general public (the potential stigmatizers) also count against any public health policy involving stigmatization. Attempts to encourage stigmatization are likely to fail to appeal to the rational decision-making abilities of the general public, and the creation of stigmatized groups (even if they are stigmatized for their voluntary behavior) is an obstacle to the self-improvement of members of the general public.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Política de Salud/tendencias , Principios Morales , Prejuicio , Salud Pública/ética , Opinión Pública , Fumar , Estereotipo , Análisis Ético , Teoría Ética , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Humanos , Obligaciones Morales , Prejuicio/ética , Prejuicio/tendencias , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/tendencias , Política Pública/tendencias , Fumar/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine longitudinal trends from 1999-2010 in weight-related teasing as adolescents transition to young adulthood and to examine secular trends in teasing among early and middle adolescents over the same time period. DESIGN AND METHODS: To examine longitudinal changes we used data from 2,287 participants in Project EAT-III, an ongoing cohort that followed two age cohorts of adolescents from 1999 to 2010. Over the study period the younger cohort transitioned from early adolescence to early young adulthood and the older cohort transitioned from middle adolescence to middle young adulthood. To examine how levels of teasing among early and middle adolescents changed from 1999-2010 (secular trends), we compared baseline data from EAT-I to cross-sectional data from a new cohort of early and middle adolescents that was established in 2010. RESULTS: In 1999, 29% of early adolescent and 23% of middle adolescent females reported being teased. Approximately 18% of males in both age groups reported being teased in 1999. Longitudinal trends suggest that weight-related teasing remained stable among all subgroups as they transitioned to young adulthood, except among early adolescent males where teasing increased to 27% in early young adulthood. Analyses of age-matched secular trends show that teasing decreased by 10.4% among early adolescent females and by 7.6% among middle adolescent males from 1999-2010. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that interventions that focus on reducing weight-based discrimination are needed throughout adolescence and young adulthood. The secular decrease in weight-related teasing is promising, but the high prevalence of teasing remains a public health concern.