RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared efficacy of vonoprazan-dual or triple therapies and bismuth-quadruple therapy for treatment-naive Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection in Southern China, where primary resistance rates of clarithromycin and levofloxacin are >30%. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated, three-arm, randomized clinical trial in Southern China. Between March 2022 and August 2023, treatment-naïve HP-infected adults were randomly assigned to receive one of three 14-day regimens (1:1:1 ratio): vonoprazan-dual (VA-dual; vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily), vonoprazan-triple (VAC-triple; vonoprazan 20 mg/amoxicillin 1 g/clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily), or bismuth-quadruple therapy containing bismuth, esomeprazole, tetracycline, and metronidazole. Primary outcome was noninferiority in HP eradication, evaluated by UBT 4-6 weeks post-treatment by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis (based on subjects who completed 14-day treatment and rechecked UBT). Bonferroni-adjusted p-value of <0.017 was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 298 subjects (mean age: 35.7 ± 8.4 years; male: 134 [45.0%]; VC-dual: 100, VAC-triple: 98, bismuth-quadruple: 100) were enrolled, and 292 (98.0%) had UBT rechecked. ITT analysis showed that both VA-dual (eradication rate of 96.0%) and VAC-triple therapies (95.9%) were noninferior to bismuth-quadruple therapy (92.0%) (difference: 4.0%, 95% CI: -2.9% to 11.5%, p < 0.001; and 3.9%, 95% CI: -3.1% to 11.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). PP analysis also revealed noninferiority (96.7% or 96.7% vs. 97.4%, with difference: -2.9% and -2.9%, p = 0.009 and 0.010, respectively). The frequency of adverse events was 39.0%, 56.1%, and 71.0% in VA-dual, VAC-triple, and bismuth-quadruple therapies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VA-dual and VA-triple therapies are highly effective and noninferior to bismuth-quadruple therapy in Southern China. Given the lower adverse effects and fewer antibiotic use, VA-dual therapy is the preferred first-line treatment for HP infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200056375). Registered on February 4, 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=14131.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bismuto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , China , Resultado del Tratamiento , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Esomeprazol/uso terapéutico , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the nine most widely studied Vonoprazan (VPZ)-based treatment regimens along with traditional Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based treatment regimens in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. DESIGN: Through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, we exclusively included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy of VPZ-based and PPI-based therapies for H. pylori infection. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly. RESULTS: The RCTs were collected from the earliest available date up to August 2023. Twenty-one RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 5481. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that the eradication rate of the VPZ-based quadruple 14-day (VPZ-Q14) treatment regimen in Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was the highest (SUCRA: 0.874); The eradication rate of the VPZ-based quadruple 10-day (VPZ-Q10) treatment plan in Per-protocol (PP) analysis was the highest (SUCRA: 0.849). All regimens were well tolerated without significant differences. According to the probability ranking of safety, high-dose VPZ-based dual 14-day therapy (H-VPZ-D14) ranked first in SUCRA, reaching 0.952. This indicates that H-VPZ-D14 treatment is the safest with a relatively low incidence of adverse effect. Therefore, VPZ-based therapies not only have a higher eradication rate, but also possess satisfactory safety. CONCLUSION: Compared with traditional PPI-based therapies, VPZ-based therapies have shown superior eradication effects. Based on the Ranking Plot of the Network, the VPZ-Q14 or VPZ-Q10 treatment regimen for H. pylori has a higher eradication rate and acceptable differences compared to other treatment regimens. In addition, for regions with high antibiotic resistance rates, we recommend a 14-day quadruple therapy with bismuth based on VPZ.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Metaanálisis en Red , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine. The PRODROME trial previously demonstrated that ubrogepant treatment during prodrome prevents the onset of moderate or severe headache. In this analysis of the PRODROME trial, the benefits of ubrogepant treatment during the prodrome on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are evaluated. METHODS: PRODROME was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial that enrolled adults who experienced 2-8 migraine attacks per month with moderate-severe headache pain. Eligible participants treated 2 qualifying prodrome events, defined as a migraine attack with prodromal symptoms when the participant was confident a headache would follow within 1-6 hours. Participants were randomized to treatment sequence A (placebo then ubrogepant 100 mg) or sequence B (ubrogepant 100 mg then placebo). This analysis evaluated the ability to function normally over 24 hours (secondary end point) and at specific time points after dose (additional end point). Other PRO end points included activity limitation over 24 hours and satisfaction with study medication at 8 and 24 hours. RESULTS: Of 518 randomized participants, 477 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. After treatment of qualifying prodrome events, a significantly greater ability to function normally over 24 hours was observed for participants after treatment with ubrogepant 100 mg compared with placebo (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.40-1.96; p < 0.0001). As early as 2 hours after dose, a greater proportion of ubrogepant-treated participants reported "no disability, able to function normally" compared with placebo (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.32-2.35; nominal p = 0.0001). Ubrogepant administered during the prodrome was also associated with a greater reduction in activity limitations over 24 hours after dose (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.61-2.67; nominal p < 0.0001). At 8 and 24 hours after dose, rates of being "satisfied" or "extremely satisfied" were greater for ubrogepant than for placebo (8 hours: OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.78-3.15; nominal p < 0.0001; 24 hours: OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.78-3.02; nominal p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Ubrogepant 100 mg administered during the prodrome was associated with significantly greater ability to function normally, greater reduction in activity limitations over 24 hours, and greater satisfaction with study medication, compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04492020. Submitted: July 27, 2020; first patient enrolled: August 21, 2020. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04492020. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that taking ubrogepant 100 mg during a migraine prodrome allows more patients to function normally over the next 24 hours.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina , Estudios Cruzados , Trastornos Migrañosos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Piridinas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We previously optimized the duration and dose of vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual therapy in China. The efficacy of vonoprazan with b.i.d. amoxicillin in comparison with vonoprazan-containing quadruple therapy as the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection has not been adequately evaluated. METHODS: In a non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial, H. pylori infected and treatment-naïve patients were randomly assigned to receive 14 days of either vonoprazan dual (vonoprazan 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily) or quadruple therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg + amoxicillin 1 g + furazolidone 100 mg + bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg twice daily). H. pylori status was confirmed using 13C-urea breath tests or fecal antigen test. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate following vonoprazan dual and quadruple therapy at 4-12 weeks. We also compared drug compliance to either regimen and documented their side effect. RESULTS: A total of 190 subjects were randomized. The eradication rate of vonoprazan dual and quadruple therapy were 87.4% and 92.6% (p = 0.23) by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, and 96.5% and 97.7% (p = 0.63) by per-protocol analysis, respectively. The efficacy of vonoprazan dual therapy was non-inferior to vonoprazan-containing quadruple therapy in per-protocol analysis (p < 0.001; difference: -1.2%; 90% confidence interval: -5.4% to 3.0%). CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan with b.i.d. amoxicillin for 14 days provided similar satisfactory efficacy with vonoprazan-containing quadruple therapy as a first-line H. pylori treatment in China.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , China , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited. METHODS: Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators. CONCLUSION: In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Colitis Ulcerosa , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Overactivation of the PI3K/AKT pathway can occur in many cancers. Capivasertib is a potent, selective pan-AKT inhibitor. The objectives of this analysis were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for capivasertib and to quantitatively assess the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the pharmacokinetics of capivasertib. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from four phase I and II studies were combined. Capivasertib was administered orally at a dose range of 80-800 mg twice daily over 28-day and 21-day cycles as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel or fulvestrant, using continuous dosing or one of two intermittent dosing schedules: either 4 days on, 3 days off (4/3) or 2 days on, 5 days off (2/5). Several models and approaches were tested for their ability to describe capivasertib disposition. The covariates assessed included dose, schedule, age, body weight, race, sex, creatinine clearance, hepatic function, renal function, smoking status, food effect, formulation, and concomitant use with paclitaxel, fulvestrant, cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A (CYP3A) inducers, CYP3A inhibitors and acid-reducing agents. RESULTS: A total of 3963 capivasertib plasma concentrations from 441 patients were included. Capivasertib pharmacokinetics was adequately described by a three-compartment model where the apparent clearance (CL/F) presented a moderate time-dependent and dose-dependent clearance. Following oral administration of multiple doses of capivasertib (400 mg twice daily; [4/3]), the initial CL/F was 62.2 L/h (between-subject variability 39.3%), and after approximately 120 hours, CL/F decreased by 18%. The effective half-life was 8.34 h. Steady state was predicted to be reached on every third and fourth dosing day each week from the second week with exposure levels that produced robust inhibition of AKT but not of other related kinases. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration of capivasertib were proportional between the dose levels of 80-480 mg after multiple doses but more than proportional beyond 480 mg. Schedule, age, race, sex, creatinine clearance, hepatic function, renal function, smoking status and concomitant use with fulvestrant, CYP3A inducers, CYP3A inhibitors or acid-reducing agents were not significant covariates for capivasertib pharmacokinetics. Concomitant use of paclitaxel, food effect and formulation statistically significantly affected capivasertib pharmacokinetics, but the effect was low. Body weight was statistically significantly related to capivasertib CL/F, with a 12% reduction in CL/F at steady state and a 14% increase in the area under the curve for 12 hours at steady state and maximum concentration at steady state at a lower body weight (47 kg vs 67 kg reference). CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib pharmacokinetics showed moderate between-subject variability, and most covariates assessed had no significant impact. Body weight, dose, concomitant use of paclitaxel, food effect and formulation showed statistically significant effects. However, these were predicted to impact exposure to capivasertib by <20% and were not expected to be clinically relevant. Based on the population pharmacokinetics, no a priori dose adjustment is needed for intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Pirroles/farmacocinética , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Fulvestrant/farmacocinética , Fulvestrant/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Administración Oral , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by facial erythema and telangiectasia. Despite ongoing research, the pathogenesis of rosacea remains incompletely understood, and current therapies are not entirely satisfactory. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway plays an essential role in immunoregulation, inflammation, and neurovascular regulation. Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway appears to hold promise as a potential therapy for rosacea. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib on rosacea and to preliminarily explore its therapeutic mechanism. To this end, a rosacea-like mouse model was induced using LL37 and treated with a 2% tofacitinib emulsion. The results demonstrated that topical application of tofacitinib significantly ameliorated rosacea-like phenotype, reduced the infiltration of CD4+ T cells and mast cells, and suppressed dermal angiogenesis. RT-qPCR analysis revealed a reduction in mRNA expression levels of STAT1, STAT4, and STAT5a in skin lesions following topical tofacitinib treatment. Additionally, three patients diagnosed with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) were included in the study and treated with oral tofacitinib, leading to a significant improvement in erythema and flushing symptoms. These findings collectively suggest that tofacitinib alleviates LL37-induced rosacea-like skin inflammation in mice and rosacea skin lesions by inhibiting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
Asunto(s)
Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Rosácea , Transducción de Señal , Adulto , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración Oral , Administración Tópica , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/farmacología , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/administración & dosificación , Quinasas Janus/metabolismo , Quinasas Janus/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mastocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Mastocitos/inmunología , Mastocitos/metabolismo , Piperidinas/farmacología , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/farmacología , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Rosácea/tratamiento farmacológico , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/patología , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción STAT/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción STAT/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Transcripción STAT1/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to identify the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with UC in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This open-label, observational, prospective, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted at 22 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with moderate to severe active UC who received tofacitinib were included and followed up for up to 52 weeks. Tofacitinib was administered at a dosage of 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks, followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily at the investigator's discretion based on clinical evaluation according to the approved Korean label. Safety including adverse events (AEs) and effectiveness including clinical remission, clinical response, and endoscopic mucosal healing were evaluated. Safety analysis set was defined as all patients registered for this study who received at least one dose of tofacitinib according to the approved Korean label and followed up for safety data. Effectiveness analysis set included patients in the safety analysis set who were evaluated for overall effectiveness assessment and excluded patients who had received tofacitinib less than 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were enrolled, of whom 106 patients were included in the safety population. The median duration of treatment was 370 days and the treatment duration ranged from 16 to 684 days for the safety population. AEs occurred in 42 patients (39.6%). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 patients (6.6%) and of them, there were 2 cases of serious infections. These serious infections were reported as Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) in this study and no other AESI were reported. There were no cases of death during the study period. Clinical remission rates were 40.0%, 46.7%, 57.6%, and 55.1% at 8, 16, 24, and 52 weeks, and clinical response rates were 77.8%, 87.9%, 56.6%, and 81.4% at each visit, respectively. Endoscopic mucosal healing rates were 58.7% at 16 weeks and 46.2% at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib was effective in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC and the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib. This study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC in routine clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04071405, registered on 28 August 2019.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Piperidinas , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, has demonstrated greater potency and a longer duration of acid suppression when compared to the proton pump inhibitors. However, data regarding the comparison between vonoprazan-based triple therapy with standard treatment for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy between 7-day vonoprazan-based triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin (VAC-7) and 14-day extended sequential therapy (S-14). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial following a noninferiority design. Subjects over 20 years old with confirmed H. pylori infection were enrolled prospectively from Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital. They were randomly assigned to the VAC-7 or S-14 group. The primary endpoint was the eradication rate in first-line treatment, evaluated by urea breath test, with noninferiority determined using the Farrington-Manning method. The secondary outcome included adverse effect rates and compliance, assessed through self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: Between December 2021 and June 2023, a total of 628 patients were recruited. The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis and intention-to-treat analysis were 88.6%/81.8% for VAC-7 and 90.3%/81.4% for S-14, respectively. The VAC-7 was non-inferior to S-14 in terms of ITT analysis. Subjects experienced fewer incidences of nausea, anorexia, dizziness, fatigue, and any severe adverse events in the VAC-7 group. Compliance was higher in the VAC-7 group, with 94% taking all the pills correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings supported the use of 7-day vonoprazan triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin as the standard first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05371249.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is superior to traditional proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in acid suppression and has been approved in the treatment of acid-related disorders. Accumulating evidence suggest associations between PPI use and gut microbiota, yet the effect of vonoprazan on GI microbiota is obscure. METHODS: Transgenic FVB/N insulin-gastrin (INS-GAS) mice as a model of gastric cancer (GC) were administered vonoprazan by gavage every other day for 12 weeks. Stomachs were evaluated by histopathology, Ki-67 proliferation index, and inflammatory cytokines. The mucosal and lumen microbiota from stomach, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and feces were detected using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: Higher incidence of intestinal metaplasia and epithelial proliferation were observed in the vonoprazan group than that in the control mice. Vonoprazan also elevated the gastric expression of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6. Each mice comprised a unique microbiota composition that was consistent across different niches. The structure of GI microbiota changed dramatically after vonoprazan treatment with the stomach being the most disturbed segment. Vonoprazan administration shifted the gut microbiota toward the enrichment of pathogenic Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Bilophila, and the loss of commensal Prevotella, Bifidobacterium, and Faecalibacterium. Interestingly, compared to the controls, microbial interactions were weaker in the stomach while stronger in the jejunum of the vonoprazan group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term vonoprazan treatment promoted gastric lesions in male INS-GAS mice, with the disequilibrium of GI microbiome. The clinical application of vonoprazan needs to be judicious particularly among those with high risk of GC.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Pirroles , Neoplasias Gástricas , Sulfonamidas , Animales , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Gástricas/microbiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Citocinas/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of preprandial or postprandial administration of amoxicillin on the efficacy of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VA-dual therapy) for Helicobacter pylori treatment has not been studied. It is also unclear whether amoxicillin dosing four times daily is more effective than three times daily. We aimed to investigate the effect of different amoxicillin administration regimens on the efficacy of VA-dual therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: H. pylori-infected subjects were randomly assigned to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a 14-day dual therapy consisting of vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily before meals (BM-TID) or 1000 mg three times daily after meals (AM-TID) or 750 mg four times daily after meals (AM-QID). H. pylori eradication rates, adverse events rates, compliance, and antibiotic resistance were compared. RESULTS: Between May 2021 to April 2023, 327 subjects were enrolled. The eradication rates of BM-TID, AM-TID, and AM-QID dual therapy were 88.1%, 89.9%, and 93.6% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 90.6%, 94.2%, and 99.0% in modified ITT (MITT) analysis, and 90.4%, 94.1%, and 99.0% in per-protocol (PP) analysis. Although there was non-inferiority between BM-TID and AM-TID, as well as between AM-TID and AM-QID, AM-QID was significantly more effective than BM-TID. There were no significant differences in adverse event rates, compliance, and antibiotic resistance among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postprandial administration and the increased frequency of administration of amoxicillin may contribute to a better efficacy of VA-dual therapy, especially for rescue therapy. All VA-dual therapy in our study could achieve good efficacy for first-line treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05901051.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Adulto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VAT) in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of VAT in the Chinese population. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, and two-stage study was conducted at 23 centers in Fujian, China (May 2021-April 2022). H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT), BQT-Vonoprazan (BQT-V), seven-day VAT (VAT-7), ten-day VAT (VAT-10), and fourteen-day VAT (VAT-14) groups. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary endpoint was the frequency of adverse events. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100045778. RESULTS: In the first stage, VAT-7 and BQT-V groups were selected for early termination because less than 23 among 28 cases were eradicated. In the second stage, the eradication rates for BQT, VAT-10, and VA-14 were 80.2% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 71.4%-86.8%], 93.2% (86.6%-96.7%), 92.2% (85.3%-96.0%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 80.9% (95%CI: 71.7%-87.5%), 94.0% (87.5%-97.2%), and 93.9% (87.4%-97.2%) in the per-protocol analysis. The ITT analysis showed a higher eradication rate in the VAT-10 and VAT-14 groups than in the BQT group (P = 0.022 and P = 0.046, respectively). The incidence of adverse events in the VAT-10 and VAT-14 groups was lower than in the BQT group (25.27% and 13.73% vs 37.62%, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VAT with a duration of 10 or 14 days achieves a higher eradication rate than the BQT, with a more tolerable safety profile in H. pylori-infected patients in Fujian.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , China/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
Inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis are major health problems. Although different techniques and drugs are clinically available for the diagnosis and therapy of the disease, novel approaches regarding radiolabeled drug delivery systems are researched. Hence, in the present study, it was aimed to design, prepare, and characterize 99mTc-radiolabeled and tofacitinib citrate-encapsulated microsphere loaded poloxamer in situ gel formulations for the intra-articular treatment. Among nine different microsphere formulations, MS/TOFA-9 was chosen as the most proper one due to particle size, high encapsulation efficiency, and in vitro drug release behavior. Poloxamer 338 at a concentration of 15% was used to prepare in situ gel formulations. For intra-articular administration, microspheres were dispersed in an in situ gel containing 15% Poloxamer 338 and characterized in terms of gelation temperature, viscosity, rheological, mechanical, and spreadability properties. After the determination of the safe dose for MS/TOFA-9 and PLX-MS/TOFA-9 as 40 µL/mL in the cell culture study performed on healthy cells, the high anti-inflammatory effects were due to significant cellular inhibition of fibroblasts. In the radiolabeling studies with 99mTc, the optimum radiolabeling condition was determined as 200 ppm SnCl2 and 0.5 mg ascorbic acid, and both 99mTc-MS/TOFA-9 and 99mTc-PLX-MS/TOFA-9 exhibited high cellular binding capacity. In conclusion, although further in vivo experiments are required, PLX-MS/TOFA-9 was found to be a promising agent for intra-articular injection in rheumatoid arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Quitosano , Geles , Microesferas , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Pirimidinas/química , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/química , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Quitosano/química , Humanos , Tecnecio/química , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Pirroles/química , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Animales , Poloxámero/química , Tamaño de la Partícula , Liberación de FármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune pathology manifested by loss of hair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with AA and variants. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trail (RCT) carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Teaching Institute-Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with AA, alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU) with minimum 50% scalp hair loss for a period ≥ 06 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (Group I) or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg body weight once daily (Group II). The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, evaluated at baseline and 06 months follow-up. Safety was consistently assessed during the study. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients underwent random allocation into either the tofacitinib group (n = 52) or the azathioprine group (n = 52). The mean (SD) age of patients was 20.23 (7.14) years and 22.26 (8.07) years, while the mean (SD) disease duration was 6.59 (4.01) years and 7.98 (4.40) years in in Group I and II, respectively. Overall, 40 (38.5%) patients were adolescents while 70 (67.3%) were male. 52 (50%) had AA, 37 (35.5%) had AT and 15 (14.5%) had AU. Mean baseline SALT score in tofacitinib group was 91.02 ± 10.21 and azathioprine group was 91.02 ± 10.63, which at 06 months follow-up improved to 14.1 ± 24.6 and 63.9 ± 33.9, respectively (difference, 11.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 38.3-61.3, p < 0.0001). Overall, no major adverse effects and no difference among the minor adverse effects in the two groups (04 adverse events for tofacitinib group and 08 for azathioprine group: p = 0.23) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of tofacitinib was significantly higher than azathioprine, whilst both drugs were well-tolerated in patients with AA and variants.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Alopecia , Azatioprina , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Alopecia Areata/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Alopecia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Niño , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
An open-label, single-center, phase I study was conducted to determine the absolute bioavailability and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of capivasertib-a potent, selective AKT serine/threonine kinase inhibitor-in healthy males. In part 1, six participants received a single oral dose of capivasertib (400 mg; tablets) followed by a [14C]-radiolabeled intravenous microdose of capivasertib (100 µg). After a 14-day washout, five of the participants proceeded to part 2 and received a single oral dose of [14C]capivasertib (400 mg; solution). In part 1, median time of maximum observed concentration for capivasertib was 1.7 hours, geometric mean terminal elimination half-life was 12.9 hours, and absolute bioavailability was estimated at 28.6% (90% confidence interval, 23.9 to 34.2). In part 2, a high proportion of the administered radioactivity was recovered over the 168-hour sampling period [mean recovery: 95.1% (feces, 50.4%; urine, 44.7%)]. Unchanged capivasertib in urine accounted for 7.4% of the total dose and 21.1% of the systemically available drug. Geometric mean renal clearance was 8.3 L/h, suggesting active tubular secretion. Twelve metabolites were identified in plasma. M11 (AZ14102143)-the glucuronide conjugate of capivasertib, inactive as an AKT serine/threonine kinase inhibitor-was the most abundant, accounting for a mean 78.4% of the plasma drug-related area under the curve. Of 22 metabolites identified in excreta, M11 was the most abundant (mean 28.2% of administered dose), indicating direct glucuronidation as one of the major routes of metabolism. No new safety concerns were identified. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study provides characterization of the pharmacokinetics of capivasertib-a potent, selective AKT serine/threonine kinase (AKT) inhibitor-including absolute bioavailability, mass balance, and metabolic fate in humans; the findings are being used to inform further clinical development. Absolute bioavailability was estimated at 28.6%, and mean recovery of the administered dose in excreta over 168 hours was 95.1%. M11 (AZ14102143)-the glucuronide conjugate, inactive as an AKT inhibitor-was the most abundant identified metabolite in plasma and excreta.
Asunto(s)
Disponibilidad Biológica , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Administración Oral , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/sangre , Distribución Tisular , Pirroles/farmacocinética , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/metabolismo , Pirroles/orina , Pirroles/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Semivida , Heces/química , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/sangre , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Inflammatory skin diseases are typically managed with semi-solid formulations such as creams and ointments. These treatments often fail to remain on the skin for long, as they can be easily wiped off by clothing, necessitating frequent reapplication throughout the day and resulting in poor patient adherence. Therefore, this study sought to fabricate an electrospun dressing as an alternative dosage form that provides a sustained release of the anti-inflammatory agent tofacitinib over three days. In this study, three types of electrospun fiber dressings - uniaxial, coaxial, and layer-by-layer - were produced and examined for their morphological, mechanical, and release characteristics. In addition to a comprehensive characterization, another objective was to analyze the drug permeation behavior from these fiber dressings on porcine skin, comparing their performance to that of a tofacitinib cream. The layer-by-layer system notably exhibited a delayed drug release, while the uniaxial and coaxial systems demonstrated an initial burst release. However, the permeation studies revealed no significant differences between these systems, underscoring the necessity of conducting such studies - a crucial aspect often overlooked in research on electrospun fiber dressings. Overall, this study highlights the potential of electrospun, drug-loaded dressings for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases.
Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Liberación de Fármacos , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/química , Animales , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Porcinos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Piel/metabolismo , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Cutánea , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/farmacocinética , Absorción Cutánea , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/química , Pirroles/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
Helicobacter pylori eradication is crucial in the treatment of peptic ulcers caused by H. pylori infection, a disease highly prevalent in Asia. We present a pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Patients aged ≥18 years with endoscopically confirmed duodenal or gastric ulcers were randomized 1 : 1 to receive vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for up to 6 (duodenal ulcers) or 8 weeks (gastric ulcers). H. pylori-positive patients received vonoprazan- or lansoprazole-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for the first 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was determined using the carbon-13 urea breath test at a follow-up visit 4 weeks post-treatment. The H. pylori eradication rate was 90.6% with vonoprazan vs. 85.2% with lansoprazole (difference: 5.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.1, 10.8). H. pylori eradication rates were 7.1% (95% CI: 1.4, 12.8) and 12.6% (95% CI: 3.9, 22.0) higher in patients aged <65 years and current smokers, respectively, with vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole. In the Chinese subpopulation, the H. pylori eradication rate was 92.0% with vonoprazan vs. 86.0% with lansoprazole (difference: 6.1%; 95% CI: 0.5, 11.7). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 72.7 vs. 62.6% of H. pylori-positive patients at baseline in the vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole arm. H. pylori eradication with vonoprazan-based quadruple therapy was noninferior to lansoprazole-based quadruple therapy and exceeded 90%, a clinically relevant threshold for determining the efficacy of H. pylori eradication regimens (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03050359; NCT03050307).
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Lansoprazol , Úlcera Péptica , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Método Doble Ciego , Lansoprazol/uso terapéutico , Lansoprazol/administración & dosificación , Lansoprazol/efectos adversos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Úlcera Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/microbiología , Anciano , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Antiulcerosos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pruebas RespiratoriasRESUMEN
The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem, home to hundreds of bacterial species and a vast repository of enzymes capable of metabolising a wide range of pharmaceuticals. Several drugs have been shown to affect negatively the composition and function of the gut microbial ecosystem. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are drugs recently approved for inflammatory bowel disease through an immediate release formulation and would potentially benefit from colonic targeted delivery to enhance the local drug concentration at the diseased site. However, their impact on the human gut microbiota and susceptibility to bacterial metabolism remain unexplored. With the use of calorimetric, optical density measurements, and metagenomics next-generation sequencing, we show that JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib citrate, baricitinib, filgotinib) have a minor impact on the composition of the human gut microbiota, while ozanimod exerts a significant antimicrobial effect, leading to a prevalence of the Enterococcus genus and a markedly different metabolic landscape when compared to the untreated microbiota. Moreover, ozanimod, unlike the JAK inhibitors, is the only drug subject to enzymatic degradation by the human gut microbiota sourced from six healthy donors. Overall, given the crucial role of the gut microbiome in health, screening assays to investigate the interaction of drugs with the microbiota should be encouraged for the pharmaceutical industry as a standard in the drug discovery and development process.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Moduladores de los Receptores de fosfatos y esfingosina 1 , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/farmacología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/microbiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/metabolismo , Pirazoles/farmacología , Colon/microbiología , Colon/metabolismo , Colon/efectos de los fármacos , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Purinas , Azetidinas/farmacología , Azetidinas/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Bencilo/farmacología , Compuestos de Bencilo/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/farmacología , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Oxadiazoles/farmacología , Oxadiazoles/administración & dosificación , Receptores de Esfingosina-1-Fosfato/metabolismo , Receptores de Esfingosina-1-Fosfato/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirroles/farmacología , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Indanos/farmacología , Indanos/administración & dosificación , Piridinas , TriazolesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and tetracycline (VT) dual therapy as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with penicillin allergy. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection and penicillin allergy were randomised 1:1 to receive either open-label VT dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg two times per day+tetracycline 500 mg three times a day) or bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT; lansoprazole 30 mg two times per day+colloidal bismuth 150 mg three times a day+tetracycline 500 mg three times a day+metronidazole 400 mg three times a day) for 14 days. The primary outcome was non-inferiority in eradication rates in the VT dual group compared with the BQT group. Secondary outcomes included assessing adverse effects. RESULTS: 300 patients were randomised. The eradication rates in the VT group and the BQT group were: 92.0% (138/150, 95% CI 86.1% to 95.6%) and 89.3% (134/150, 95% CI 83.0% to 93.6%) in intention-to-treat analysis (difference 2.7%; 95% CI -4.6% to 10.0%; non-inferiority p=0.000); 94.5% (138/146, 95% CI 89.1% to 97.4%) and 93.1% (134/144, 95% CI 87.3% to 96.4%) in modiï¬ed intention-to-treat analysis (difference 1.5%; 95% CI -4.9% to 8.0%; non-inferiority p=0.001); 95.1% (135/142, 95% CI 89.7% to 97.8%) and 97.7% (128/131, 95% CI 92.9% to 99.4%) in per-protocol analysis (difference 2.6%; 95% CI -2.9% to 8.3%; non-inferiority p=0.000). The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were significantly lower in the VT group (14.0% vs 48.0%, p=0.000), with fewer treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs (2.0% vs 8.7%, p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: VT dual therapy demonstrated efficacy and safety as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in the penicillin-allergic population, with comparable efficacy and a lower incidence of TEAEs compared with traditional BQT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300074693.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Penicilinas , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Tetraciclina , Humanos , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Tetraciclina/efectos adversos , Tetraciclina/administración & dosificación , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/efectos adversos , Bismuto/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Metronidazol/efectos adversos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/administración & dosificación , Lansoprazol/uso terapéutico , Lansoprazol/administración & dosificación , Lansoprazol/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The amoxicillin dose used in dual therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori varies across studies and the optimal amoxicillin dose for vonoprazan-based dual therapies remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose amoxicillin in vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted by searching databases from inception to October 2023. All trials that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for eradicating H. pylori were included. Pooled eradication rate, incidence of adverse events, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals are presented. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 12 low-dose amoxicillin (VLA) and 13 high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) arms were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.4% and 86.8% for VLA therapy, and 86.0% and 90.9% for VHA therapy by the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. In the subgroup analysis stratified by duration, the eradication rates achieved in 7 days, 10 days, and 14 days treatments with VLA and VHA dual therapies were 80.8%, 84.2%, 83.1%, and 67.3%, 88.8%, 87.5%, respectively. In the four randomized controlled trials that directly compared VLA and VHA dual therapies, the efficacy was not statistically different in the intention-to-treat (76.9% vs 81.4%, p = 0.337) and per-protocol (81.6% vs 84.0%, p = 0.166) analyses. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events (p = 0.965) and compliance (p = 0.994) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: VLA therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to VHA therapy, along with regional differences. An appropriately extended treatment duration may be critical for therapeutic optimization of vonoprazan-amoxicillin treatment.