RESUMEN
Tepotinib is approved for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. While edema is the most prevalent adverse event (AE) and a known class effect of MET inhibitors including tepotinib, there is still limited understanding about the factors contributing to its occurrence. Herein, we apply machine learning (ML)-based approaches to predict the likelihood of occurrence of edema in patients undergoing tepotinib treatment, and to identify factors influencing its development over time. Data from 612 patients receiving tepotinib in five Phase I/II studies were modeled with two ML algorithms, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Trees, to predict edema AE incidence and severity. Probability calibration was applied to give a realistic estimation of the likelihood of edema AE. Best model was tested on follow-up data and on data from clinical studies unused while training. Results showed high performances across all the tested settings, with F1 scores up to 0.961 when retraining the model with the most relevant covariates. The use of ML explainability methods identified serum albumin as the most informative longitudinal covariate, and higher age as associated with higher probabilities of more severe edema. The developed methodological framework enables the use of ML algorithms for analyzing clinical safety data and exploiting longitudinal information through various covariate engineering approaches. Probability calibration ensures the accurate estimation of the likelihood of the AE occurrence, while explainability tools can identify factors contributing to model predictions, hence supporting population and individual patient-level interpretation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Edema , Aprendizaje Automático , Humanos , Edema/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas , PiridazinasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the outcomes of first-line imatinib versus nilotinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: A propensity score analysis was performed to eliminate imbalances between the treatment groups. In the analysis, 163 patients in the nilotinib group and 163 patients in the matched imatinib group were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Nilotinib-treated patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response more rapidly than imatinib-treated patients. However, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (OS: 94.3% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.602; PFS: 92.9% vs. 88.0%, p = 0.614). Nilotinib-treated patients had a higher failure-free survival (FFS) and event-free survival (EFS) than imatinib-treated patients (FFS: 71.7% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.040; EFS: 71.7% vs. 53.5%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis from clinical practice did not confirm any benefit of frontline nilotinib treatment for OS and PFS; however, it did demonstrate higher FFS and EFS in the nilotinib cohort.
Asunto(s)
Mesilato de Imatinib , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Mesilato de Imatinib/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of developing serious infections (SIs) vs. individuals without RA; efforts to predict SIs in this patient group are ongoing. We assessed the ability of different machine learning modeling approaches to predict SIs using baseline data from the tofacitinib RA clinical trials program. METHODS: This analysis included data from 19 clinical trials (phase 2, n = 10; phase 3, n = 6; phase 3b/4, n = 3). Patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) were included in the analysis; patients receiving tofacitinib 11 mg once daily were considered as tofacitinib 5 mg BID. All available patient-level baseline variables were extracted. Statistical and machine learning methods (logistic regression, support vector machines with linear kernel, random forest, extreme gradient boosting trees, and boosted trees) were implemented to assess the association of baseline variables with SI (logistic regression only), and to predict SI using selected baseline variables using 5-fold cross-validation. Missing values were handled individually per prediction model. RESULTS: A total of 8404 patients with RA treated with tofacitinib were eligible for inclusion (15,310 patient-years of total follow-up) of which 473 patients reported SIs. Amongst other baseline factors, age, previous infection, and corticosteroid use were significantly associated with SI. When applying prediction modeling for SI across data from all studies, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve ranged from 0.656 to 0.739. AUROC values ranged from 0.599 to 0.730 in data from phase 3 and 3b/4 studies, and from 0.563 to 0.643 in data from ORAL Surveillance only. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline factors associated with SIs in the tofacitinib RA clinical trial program were similar to established SI risk factors associated with advanced treatments for RA. Furthermore, while model performance in predicting SI was similar to other published models, this did not meet the threshold for accurate prediction (AUROC > 0.85). Thus, predicting the occurrence of SIs at baseline remains challenging and may be complicated by the changing disease course of RA over time. Inclusion of other patient-associated and healthcare delivery-related factors and harmonization of the duration of studies included in the models may be required to improve prediction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00147498; NCT00413660; NCT00550446; NCT00603512; NCT00687193; NCT01164579; NCT00976599; NCT01059864; NCT01359150; NCT02147587; NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00814307; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT01039688; NCT02187055; NCT02831855; NCT02092467.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Infecciones , Aprendizaje Automático , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Pirroles , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Infecciones/epidemiología , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Pirimidinas , Femenino , Animales , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Morfogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/patología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/metabolismo , Metales Pesados/toxicidad , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/metabolismo , Ratones , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in the treatment of pediatric AD. RECENT FINDINGS: Adolescents with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis (AD) need systemic therapies, as stated several recent practice guidelines. (JAKi) have shown their efficacy in the treatment of adult AD, however, there is a lack of information concerning efficacy and safety of their use in pediatric AD. We found that the JAKi's abrocitinib (ABRO), baricitinib (BARI), and upadacitinib (UPA), are all an effective treatment option with a very fast onset of action for adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. BARI was not effective in children between 2 and 10 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Fortunately, major safety issues with JAKi in adolescents with AD have not been documented in the trials, so far, contrasting with the reports in adults with AD, where these events have very rarely occurred. There are some reports of herpes zoster (HZ) infection in adolescents on JAKi, but it is not a major safety concern. Acne is a relatively common AE with UPA in adolescents; however, it is responsive to standard treatment. This review will help the clinician to choose among the JAKi according to the needs and clinical features of patients with moderate and severe AD. In the following years, with the advent of new biologicals and JAKi, these therapies will fall into place in each phase of the evolution of patients with AD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/administración & dosificación , Niño , Adolescente , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Azetidinas/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide is an effective medication for refractory mucocutaneous lesions of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and can treat arthritis in some autoimmune diseases, but it has some adverse reactions. Recently, the effectiveness of tofacitinib in treating mucocutaneous lesions of SLE has been reported. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib with thalidomide in treating mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions in patients with SLE. METHODS: This study was a real-world cohort study based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry. SLE patients who manifested mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal symptoms and were prescribed tofacitinib or thalidomide were included. We retrospectively conducted comparisons between the tofacitinib and thalidomide groups regarding clinical improvements, SLE disease activity, serological indicators, glucocorticoid doses, and adverse events at the 1, 3, and 6-months time points. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, the tofacitinib group exhibited a higher proportion of patients with improvement in mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal issues. Additionally, a greater percentage of patients in the tofacitinib group achieved remission or a low disease activity state (LLDAS) at these time points. No significant serological improvements were observed in either the tofacitinib or thalidomide groups. Fewer adverse events were observed in the tofacitinib group than in the thalidomide group. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib might be superior to thalidomide in the improvement of mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions in SLE, and had a good safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Talidomida , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , China , Estudios de CohortesAsunto(s)
Chalazión , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Chalazión/inducido químicamente , Chalazión/diagnóstico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Cápsulas , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Párpados/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Párpados/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited. METHODS: Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators. CONCLUSION: In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Colitis Ulcerosa , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Genetic variants of UGT1A1, involved in glucuronidation and clearance of bilirubin, are associated with reduced bilirubin metabolization and drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia. We studied the impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with pazopanib, cabozantinib, and axitinib. METHODS: We genotyped the UGT1A1*28 TA6/TA6-TA6/TA7-TA7/TA7 polymorphism and correlated with median baseline, on-treatment and peak bilirubin levels during therapy, incidence of grade-1- or -2 (G1/2)-hyperbilirubinemia and time-to-G1-hyperbilirubinemia. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients treated with pazopanib, 29 received axitinib and 28 cabozantinib upon progression. Median baseline bilirubin was higher in TA7/TA7-carriers versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers at start of pazopanib (P < .0001), cabozantinib (P < .0001), and axitinib (P = .007). During pazopanib therapy, median bilirubin increased 1.4-fold in TA7/TA7+TA6/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6-carriers. On cabozantinib, bilirubin increased 1.5-fold in TA7/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers. Axitinib did not increase bilirubin in any genotype. Peak bilirubin in TA7/TA7- versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers was higher on pazopanib (P < .0001) or cabozantinib (P < .0001). With pazopanib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 57% of TA7/TA7- and 12% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P = .0009) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 36% and 6% of the patients, respectively (P = .004). On cabozantinib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 100% of TA7/TA7- and 5% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P < .0001) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 33% and 0% of the patients, respectively (P = .04). On axitinib, no correlation between the genotypes and G1/2-hyperbilirubinemia was observed. CONCLUSION: We validate the previously described impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on isolated bilirubin increase on pazopanib. We report for the first time that cabozantinib also interferes with UGT1A1 and causes isolated bilirubin increase.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Glucuronosiltransferasa , Hiperbilirrubinemia , Indazoles , Neoplasias Renales , Piridinas , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Glucuronosiltransferasa/genética , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hiperbilirrubinemia/inducido químicamente , Hiperbilirrubinemia/genética , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Axitinib/uso terapéutico , Axitinib/efectos adversos , Axitinib/administración & dosificación , Bilirrubina/sangre , Genotipo , Adulto , Polimorfismo Genético , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pevonedistat, a first in class inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme, in combination with irinotecan (IRN) and temozolomide (TMZ) in children with cancer. METHODS: This Phase 1 study used a rolling 6 design to evaluate escalating doses of pevonedistat in combination with standard doses of IRN and TMZ in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid or CNS tumors. During cycle 1, pevonedistat was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 10, and 12, with IRN (IV, 50 mg/m2) and TMZ (orally, 100 mg/m2), on days 8-12 of a 28-day cycle. In subsequent cycles, pevonedistat was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, with IRN/TMZ on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Thirty patients enrolled; all were eligible and evaluable for toxicity. Six patients each enrolled on pevonedistat dose levels (DL) 1 (15 mg/m2), 2 (20 mg/m2), 3 (25 mg/m2) and 4 (35 mg/m2) as well as an expanded pharmacokinetic (PK) cohort at DL4. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not exceeded. 2/12 (17 %) patients treated at the RP2D (35 mg/m2) experienced a cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT). IRN is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of pevonedistat. Two patients had a partial response and 6 patients had prolonged stable disease (> 6 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: Pevonedistat in combination with IRN/TMZ is well tolerated in children with solid or CNS tumors. The RP2D of pevonedistat is 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, 5 in combination with IRN/TMZ.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ciclopentanos , Neoplasias , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Niño , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Preescolar , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Ciclopentanos/administración & dosificación , Ciclopentanos/uso terapéutico , Ciclopentanos/farmacología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Temozolomida/administración & dosificación , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto Joven , Proteína NEDD8RESUMEN
Myelofibrosis is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, anemia, and constitutional symptoms, with a median survival of ≈6 years from diagnosis. While currently approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib) improve splenomegaly and symptoms, most can exacerbate myelofibrosis-related anemia, a negative prognostic factor for survival. Momelotinib is a novel JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) inhibitor approved in the US, European Union, and the UK and is the first JAK inhibitor indicated specifically for patients with myelofibrosis with anemia. Momelotinib not only addresses the splenomegaly and symptoms associated with myelofibrosis by suppressing the hyperactive JAK-STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) pathway but also improves anemia and reduces transfusion dependency through ACVR1 inhibition. The recommended dose of momelotinib is 200 mg orally once daily, which was established after review of safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data. Momelotinib is metabolized primarily by CYP3A4 and excreted as metabolites in feces and urine. Steady-state maximum concentration is 479 ng/mL (CV%, 61%), with a mean AUCtau of 3288 ng.h/mL (CV%, 60%); its major metabolite, M21, is active (≈40% of pharmacological activity of parent), with a metabolite-to-parent AUC ratio of 1.4-2.1. This review describes momelotinib's mechanism of action, detailing how the JAK-STAT pathway is involved in myelofibrosis pathogenesis and ACVR1 inhibition decreases hepcidin, leading to improved erythropoiesis. Additionally, it summarizes the pivotal studies and data that informed the recommended dosage and risk/benefit assessment.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Humanos , Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Mielofibrosis Primaria/metabolismo , Benzamidas/farmacología , Benzamidas/farmacocinética , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Animales , Janus Quinasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Janus Quinasa 1/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Janus Quinasa 2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Janus Quinasa 2/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con PuentesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effectiveness and safety of advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) warrant assessment in the real world. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and summarize real-world evidence of advanced therapies approved for moderate-to-severe UC. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using real-world studies of biologics or small molecules in UC using Embase, MEDLINE, and MEDLINE-In Process databases. Only products approved in any jurisdiction during the search were included. English-language full-papers (January 2005 to February 2022) and congress abstracts (January 2019 to February 2022) were included. Studies with less than 30 patients or only biologic-naive patients were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 139 studies were included out of 3,930 identified articles (75%, published between 2019 and 2022; 64%, retrospective observational; 53%, from 5 countries [Italy, United States, Spain, United Kingdom, and Belgium]). Most studies were single agent (highest: vedolizumab = 50, tofacitinib = 24, and adalimumab = 18), and rates of clinical remission (CR) and adverse events varied widely. From the published comparative effectiveness studies (16), the rates of CR were numerically higher with vedolizumab vs anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents. Compared with vedolizumab, the effectiveness of tofacitinib was numerically greater in CR (occasionally significant). Rates of steroid-free CR were comparable between ustekinumab and tofacitinib. Infliximab was the most effective anti-TNFα agent, as reported by 2 studies. Remarkably, adverse events were similar across therapies in comparative studies. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab and tofacitinib were the most assessed therapies. In comparative studies, remission rates were numerically higher with tofacitinib vs vedolizumab and for vedolizumab vs anti-TNFα. Tofacitinib was comparable with ustekinumab for steroid-free CR. Safety was comparable across therapies. Future studies should explore the literature gaps identified, including limited comparative studies with small sample sizes, variations in study designs and patient characteristics, varied definitions of CR, and limited use of patient-reported outcome measures in real-world settings.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Bleeding diathesis is an uncommon side effect of ibrutinib use and is seen in less than 5% of the population. We describe a case of an elderly woman with ibrutinib-induced spontaneous major extradural haematoma presenting as acute compressive myelopathy. She is a known case of splenic marginal zone lymphoma with multiple extramedullary relapses and presented to the emergency department with acute-onset low backache, followed by urinary retention. MRI revealed extradural haemorrhage. After possible evaluation, she was diagnosed with ibrutinib-induced extradural haematoma.
Asunto(s)
Adenina , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal , Piperidinas , Pirazoles , Humanos , Femenino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/efectos adversos , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/inducido químicamente , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Hematoma Espinal Epidural/inducido químicamente , Hematoma Espinal Epidural/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment strategy against immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) frequently requires other immunosuppressive agents. Tofacitinib is a rapidly acting JAK-STAT inhibitor with proven efficacy in multiple autoimmune diseases. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the management of irAEs in cancer patients. METHODS: Cancer patients who received ICIs and were treated with tofacitinib for the management of irAEs at 6 institutions were retrospectively included in this study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from electronic medical records. Longitudinal assessment of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) with clinical assessment was utilized to evaluate the benefit of tofacitinib treatment in patients with ICI myocarditis. Overall survival (OS) was also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included in this study. The median time from irAE onset to tofacitinib therapy was 17 (range, 2-186) days and the median duration of tofacitinib treatment was 52.5 (range, 3-277) days. Enrolled patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on clinical severity and steroid responsiveness including 11 life-threatening cases, 30 steroid-resistant cases, and 12 cases with steroid taper failure. Clinical remission rate in each group was 54.5%, 96.7%, and 100%, respectively (P < 0.01). Tofacitinib was well-tolerated with 4 patients (7.5%) developing infectious events. From the ICI initiation, the overall median OS was 16.1 (95% CI 7.8-26.9) months. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib showed promising clinical efficacy in patients experiencing irAEs, particularly in patients who failed to respond to steroids or experienced relapse during steroid tapering. Moreover, and most importantly, tofacitinib exhibited a favorable safety profile in cancer patients developing irAEs in terms of both toxicity and anti-tumor activity. Future prospective studies are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Masculino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , FemeninoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, joint swelling, and pain involving multiple joints. While biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are popular treatments for RA, there is limited research on their combined use. This study examined a cohort of RA patients who demonstrated inadequate response to bDMARDs and subsequently initiated combination therapy with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, assessing both the efficacy and safety profile of this therapeutic approach. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively collected the electronic medical records (EMR) of 62 adult patients with RA who were admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine between August 2018 and December 2022. All patients had received at least one bDMARD treatment for more than 3 months and still exhibited moderate-to-high disease activity. Tofacitinib 5 mg bid was added to their original biological treatment in 28 cases, and other 34 cases switched to another bDMARD or tsDMARD as control group. Treatment was continued for 24 weeks following the initiation of combination therapy. Changes in DAS28-ESR and ACR20, 50, 70 response rates at week 24 were collected and analyzed from baseline, while changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 were also collected and analyzed. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, the DAS28-ESR score in combined treatment group decreased significantly from a baseline of 5.26 ± 0.90 (3.87-8.31) to 2.67 ± 0.86 (1.41-5.11), with remission achieved by 19 patients (67.9%) and low disease activity achieved by five patients (17.9%). The DAS28-ESR in the control group exhibited a decrease from 5.20 ± 0.77 (3.87-7.23) at baseline to 3.25 ± 1.29 (1.54-5.69). In all, 13 patients (38.2%) achieved remission, while another 11 patients (32.4%) achieved low disease activity. The ACR20, 50, 70 response rates were 85.71%, 75%, and 39.29% in the combined treatment group, whereas it were 75.0%, 53.57%, 21.43% in the control group. Additionally, both ESR and CRP levels decreased significantly during the course of treatment without any reported adverse events leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Our findings offer some evidence, supporting the effectiveness and safety of combining bDMARD with JAKi tofacitinib in RA patients who have an inadequate response to bDMARD monotherapy. This combination effectively manages disease activity while maintaining a relatively low and manageable incidence of adverse events. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are anticipated to provide evidence-based medical support.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Quimioterapia Combinada , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Inducción de RemisiónAsunto(s)
Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Isoxazoles/efectos adversos , Isoxazoles/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Piperidinas , PirazolesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to identify the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with UC in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This open-label, observational, prospective, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted at 22 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with moderate to severe active UC who received tofacitinib were included and followed up for up to 52 weeks. Tofacitinib was administered at a dosage of 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks, followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily at the investigator's discretion based on clinical evaluation according to the approved Korean label. Safety including adverse events (AEs) and effectiveness including clinical remission, clinical response, and endoscopic mucosal healing were evaluated. Safety analysis set was defined as all patients registered for this study who received at least one dose of tofacitinib according to the approved Korean label and followed up for safety data. Effectiveness analysis set included patients in the safety analysis set who were evaluated for overall effectiveness assessment and excluded patients who had received tofacitinib less than 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were enrolled, of whom 106 patients were included in the safety population. The median duration of treatment was 370 days and the treatment duration ranged from 16 to 684 days for the safety population. AEs occurred in 42 patients (39.6%). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 patients (6.6%) and of them, there were 2 cases of serious infections. These serious infections were reported as Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) in this study and no other AESI were reported. There were no cases of death during the study period. Clinical remission rates were 40.0%, 46.7%, 57.6%, and 55.1% at 8, 16, 24, and 52 weeks, and clinical response rates were 77.8%, 87.9%, 56.6%, and 81.4% at each visit, respectively. Endoscopic mucosal healing rates were 58.7% at 16 weeks and 46.2% at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib was effective in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC and the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib. This study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean patients with moderate to severe active UC in routine clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04071405, registered on 28 August 2019.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Piperidinas , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Inducción de RemisiónAsunto(s)
Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Niño , Adolescente , Factores de Tiempo , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerodermia Localizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerodermia Localizada/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia SistémicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib have few treatment options. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 2 INSIGHT 2 study evaluating tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, combined with osimertinib in this population. METHODS: This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 179 academic centres and community clinics in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC of any histology, with MET amplification by tissue biopsy fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH; MET gene copy number of ≥5 or MET-to-CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (MET plasma gene copy number of ≥2·3), following progression on first-line osimertinib. Patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg plus oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed objective response in patients with MET amplification by central FISH treated with tepotinib plus osimertinib with at least 9 months of follow-up. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one study drug dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03940703 (enrolment complete). FINDINGS: Between Feb 13, 2020, and Nov 4, 2022, 128 patients (74 [58%] female, 54 [42%] male) were enrolled and initiated tepotinib plus osimertinib. The primary activity analysis population included 98 patients with MET amplification confirmed by central FISH, previous first-line osimertinib and at least 9 months of follow-up (median 12·7 months [IQR 9·9-20·3]). The confirmed objective response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 39·7-60·3; 49 of 98 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral oedema (six [5%] of 128 patients), decreased appetite (five [4%]), prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (five [4%]), and pneumonitis (four [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (13%) patients. Deaths of four (3%) patients were assessed as potentially related to either trial drug by the investigator due to pneumonitis (two [2%] patients), decreased platelet count (one [1%]), respiratory failure (one [1%]), and dyspnoea (one [1%]); one death was attributed to both pneumonitis and dyspnoea. INTERPRETATION: Tepotinib plus osimertinib showed promising activity and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib, suggesting a potential chemotherapy-sparing oral targeted therapy option that should be further investigated. FUNDING: Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945).