RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Understanding patient pathways from discovery of breast symptoms to treatment start can aid in identifying ways to improve access to timely cancer care. This study aimed to describe the patient pathways experienced by uninsured women from detection to treatment initiation for breast cancer in Mexico City and estimate the potential impact of earlier treatment on patient survival. METHODS: We used process mining, a data analytics technique, to create maps of the patient pathways. We then compared the waiting times and pathways between patients who initially consulted a private service versus those who sought care at a public health service. Finally, we conducted scenario modelling to estimate the impact of early diagnosis and treatment on patient survival. RESULTS: Our study revealed a common pathway followed by breast cancer patients treated at the two largest public cancer centres in Mexico City. However, patients who initially sought care in private clinics experienced shorter mean wait times for their first medical consultation (66 vs 88 days), and diagnostic confirmation of cancer (57 vs 71 days) compared to those who initially utilized public clinics. Our scenario modelling indicated that improving early diagnosis to achieve at least 60% of patients starting treatment at early stages could increase mean patient survival by up to two years. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the potential of process mining to inform healthcare policy for improvement of breast cancer care in Mexico. Also, our findings indicate that reducing diagnostic and treatment intervals for breast cancer patients could result in substantially better patient outcomes. POLICY SUMMARY: This study revealed significant differences in time intervals along the pathways of women with breast cancer according to the type of health service first consulted by the patients: whether public primary care clinics or private doctors. Policies directed to reduce these inequities in access to timely cancer care are desperately needed to reduce socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Femenino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vías Clínicas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to describe the health status and barriers of people who sought care on a free mobile health clinic for women without insurance in California. Participants were 221 women who attended the Salud para Mujeres (Women's Health) mobile medical clinic between 2019 and 2021. Medical chart abstractions provided data on sociodemographic factors, medical history, barriers to care, depressive symptoms, and dietary factors. Anthropometric measure, blood pressure, and biomarkers of cardiometabolic disease risk were also abstracted. Participants were young adult (29.1 [SD 9.3] years), Hispanic (97.6%), farm-working (62.2%) women from Mexico (87.0%). Prevalent barriers to accessing (non-mobile) medical care included high cost (74.5%), language (47.6%), hours of operation (36.2%), and transportation (31.4%). The majority (89.5%) of patients had overweight (34.0%) or obesity (55.5%), and 27% had hypertension. Among those (n = 127) receiving a lipid panel, 60.3% had higher than recommended levels of low-density lipoprotein and 89% had lower than recommended levels of high-density lipoprotein. Point-of-care HbA1c tests (n = 133) indicated that 9.0% had diabetes and 24.8% had prediabetes. Over half (53.1%) of patients reported prevalent occupational exposure to pesticides and 19% had moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Weekly or more frequent consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (70.9%) and fast food (43.5%) were also prevalent. Mobile health units have potential for reaching women who face several barriers to care and experience major risk factors for cardometabolic disease. Findings suggest a compelling need to assure that Hispanic and Indigenous women and farmworkers have access to healthcare.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Unidades Móviles de Salud , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , California/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , México/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sociodemográficos , Hipertensión/etnología , Hipertensión/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although the lack of health insurance has been linked to poor health outcomes in several diseases, this relationship is still understudied in trauma. There exist differences between the Puerto Rico health care system and that of the United States. We therefore aimed to assess mortality disparities related to insurance coverage at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who sustained penetrating injuries (presenting at the PRTH from 2000 to 2014) was performed. Individuals were classified by their insurance status. Study variables comprised demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between health insurance status and risk of dying. RESULTS: Patients with public health insurance experienced more complications than did individuals who had private health insurance (PrHI) or who were uninsured. This group had longer durations of mechanical ventilation and spent more time in the hospital than did patients who had PrHI or who were uninsured. However, uninsured patients with gunshot wounds were 54% (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.36) more likely to die than were their counterparts who had PrHI. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having health insurance could reduce a given patient mortality risk in trauma settings. More studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings. If these findings hold true, then providing equitable access to health services for the entire population could prevent patients suffering trauma from having premature, preventable deaths.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Heridas Penetrantes/etnología , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Analyze the association between health insurance coverage and the use of health care services, dentist visits, and self-medication in a national sample of Mexican adults aged ≥50 years with diabetes. METHODS: Participants with diabetes taken from a subsample of the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS-2018) (n = 3667) were examined, with data pertaining to the frequency of their doctor and dentist visits, residence, years of education, self-medication, and health insurance coverage (insured/uninsured) also collected. A logistic regression model was used to identify the association between independent variables and health insurance coverage, whereas Poisson regression models were also estimated to ascertain whether health insurance coverage was associated with the number of doctor and dentist visits. RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported diabetes was 24.6%, whereas approximately 93.3% of subjects had visited a doctor, 40.6% had visited a dentist, and 20.3% self-medicated. Individuals with insurance coverage were 75% (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.75 [95% confidence interval {CI}1.32-2.31]; P < 0.001) more likely to have visited a doctor and 57% more likely to have visited a dentist (OR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.35-1.83]; P < 0.001) than uninsured adult subjects, while adults living in rural areas were 77% less likely to be insured than adults living in urban areas. Doctor and dentist visits [rate ratio {RR} = 1.32 (95% CI 1.28-1.35); P < 0.001] and [RR = 1.47 (95% CI 1.37-1.58); P < 0.001, respectively] were found to be positively associated with the insured members of the study population. CONCLUSION: A positive association was found between doctor and dentist visits in the population insured with diabetes. A major public health challenge is the population of diabetics who report being uninsured, wherein this population requires coverage to access the necessary clinical follow-up and control to prevent complications.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosAsunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Ano/economía , Neoplasias del Ano/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Brasil/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Derivación y Consulta/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The characteristics of surgical patients were examined according to type of health insurance to determine whether differences existed between these groups. METHODS: We evaluated the characteristics of cases in the UPR General Surgery Department's database (entered from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018) by insurance type. The variables examined included age, gender, inpatient/outpatient status, wound classification, type of surgery, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores and whether a given patient had diabetes, was a smoker, or suffered from hypertension. This database had no trauma cases. RESULTS: Information was available for 5,097 cases during the study period. The mean age of the group was 51 (±22) years. The gender distribution indicated that 56% were women and 44% were men. The insurance types were distributed as follows: government/no insurance, 40%; Medicare, 12%; and private insurance, 48%. The government-insured/uninsured patients were younger (mean age, 41 ±24) and had had emergency surgery more frequently (18%) than had privately insured patients (10%). Medicare patients were significantly older (mean age, 72 ±12), and had had higher incidences of diabetes (46%) and hypertension (81%), presenting with ASA scores greater than or equal to 3 in 73% of cases. More privately insured individuals than those in other groups had had elective surgery (90%); 48% had been outpatients when they had their surgery, 58% had had clean wounds, and 61% of the patients having elective surgery were women. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences (P<.05) in the characteristics of patients with different types of health insurance. The frequency of emergency surgery was found to be significantly higher in the government-insured/uninsured group than in the privately insured group.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud/clasificación , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sector Privado/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Público/estadística & datos numéricos , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a health insurance disparity exists among pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury using the National Trauma Data Bank. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Trauma Data Bank, a dataset containing more than 800 trauma centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (< 18 yr old) with a severe isolated traumatic brain injury were identified in the National Trauma Database (years 2007-2016). Isolated traumatic brain injury was defined as patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3+ and excluded those with another regional Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3+. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Procedure codes were used to identify four primary treatment approaches combined into two classifications: craniotomy/craniectomy and external ventricular draining/intracranial pressure monitoring. Diagnostic criteria and procedure codes were used to identify condition at admission, including hypotension, Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism and intent of injury, and Injury Severity Score. Children were propensity score matched using condition at admission and other characteristics to estimate multivariable logistic regression models to assess the associations among insurance status, treatment, and outcomes. Among the 12,449 identified patients, 91.0% (n = 11,326) had insurance and 9.0% (n = 1,123) were uninsured. Uninsured patients had worse condition at admission with higher rates of hypotension and higher Injury Severity Score, when compared with publicly and privately insured patients. After propensity score matching, having insurance was associated with a 32% (p = 0.001) and 54% (p < 0.001) increase in the odds of cranial procedures and monitor placement, respectively. Insurance coverage was associated with 25% lower odds of inpatient mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with insured pediatric patients with a traumatic brain injury, uninsured patients were in worse condition at admission and received fewer interventional procedures with a greater odds of inpatient mortality. Equalizing outcomes for uninsured children following traumatic brain injury requires a greater understanding of the factors that lead to worse condition at admission and policies to address treatment disparities if causality can be identified.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Niño , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes continue to improve, but they vary significantly by race and ethnicity. We hypothesize that these disparities arise from unequal access to care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Harris Health System (HHS) is an integrated health delivery network that provides medical care to the underserved, predominantly minority population of Harris County, Texas. As the largest HHS facility and an affiliate of Baylor College of Medicine's Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ben Taub Hospital (BTH) delivers cancer care through multidisciplinary subspecialty that prioritize access to care, adherence to evidence-based clinical pathways, integration of supportive services, and mitigation of financial toxicity. We performed a retrospective analysis of minority patients diagnosed with and treated for metastatic CRC at BTH between January 2010 and December 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared with survival curves from randomized control trials reported during that time period. RESULTS: We identified 103 patients; 40% were black, 49% were Hispanic, and 12% were Asian or Middle Eastern. Thirty-five percent reported a language other than English as their preferred language. Seventy-four percent of patients with documented coverage status were uninsured. Eighty-four percent of patients received standard chemotherapy with a clinician-reported response rate of 63%. Overall survival for BTH patients undergoing chemotherapy was superior to that of subjects enrolled in the CRYSTAL (Cetuximab Combined with Irinotecan in First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer) trial (median, 24.0 vs. 19.9 months; P = .014). CONCLUSION: HHS provides a health delivery infrastructure through which minority patients with socioeconomic challenges experience clinical outcomes comparable with highly selected patients enrolled in randomized control trials. Efforts to resolve CRC disparities should focus on improving access of at-risk populations to high-quality comprehensive cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Policy Points States are enacting a host of policy initiatives designed to reduce the number of Americans without health insurance. Policymakers and policy analysts need to examine whether this "laboratory of federalism" is producing ideas that can and should be replicated on a national scale. This article evaluates reform efforts in two states: Washington state, which enacted what its policymakers call a "public option" and New Mexico, which failed in its effort to enact a Medicaid buy-in. Some common themes emerge. First, without federal funding, state efforts to aid the uninsured remain limited. Second, the gap between commercial and public insurance reimbursement rates poses an additional significant obstacle. Washington state was able to overcome these obstacles by enacting a law (called Cascade Care) which imposes public sector reimbursement rates in a commercial insurance market (the state's ACA Marketplace). This quasi- or redefined public option could become a politically viable model for federal policymakers.
Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental , Política de Salud , Humanos , New Mexico , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Investigación Cualitativa , Estados Unidos , WashingtónRESUMEN
Over the last decade, Baltimore has become a non-traditional sanctuary city, receiving an unprecedented influx of Latino immigrants, mostly from Central America's Northern Triangle, who are often fleeing violence in their home countries. This study explored the nature and frequency of healthcare utilization for mental health problems among uninsured/uninsurable Latinos who received outpatient care between 2012 and 2015 through an academic hospital-affiliated program that covers primary and specialty services to uninsured patients without regard to documentation status. Encounters for mental health disorders were the most common category, accounting for 14.88% of all visits. Mood (78%) and anxiety disorders (16%) were the most prevalent mental health diagnoses. The most frequent reason to seek care was symptom, signs, and ill-defined conditions (37.47%), and within this subgroup, pain was the leading cause of seeking care (88%), which may indicate high rates of somatization of mental health distress. This study presents a unique opportunity to explore the burden and nature of mental health needs among a population for which healthcare information is rarely attainable and highlights the need for culturally competent screening mechanisms and interventions to address the stressors faced by emergent communities.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria , Baltimore/epidemiología , América Central/etnología , Niño , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Emigración e Inmigración , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Política , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate emergency department (ED) pediatric mortality by patient neighborhood income. STUDY DESIGN: We calculated the incidence of ED pediatric mortality via a cross-sectional study of children <18 years who died in an ED using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample and US Census from 2012 to 2016. The main exposure was median income for the patient's zip code tabulation area quartile. To determine factors associated with ED mortality, we modeled mortality using negative binomial regression. We used an interaction term between neighborhood income and insurance type to evaluate their relationship to mortality. RESULTS: There were 64â893 ED deaths during the study period (incidence 17.3 per 100â000 person-years). The incidence of ED mortality increased with decreasing neighborhood income: compared with the wealthiest income quartile, the poorest, second, and third quartiles had adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of 1.79 (95% CI 1.63-1.96), 1.42 (95% CI 1.29-1.55), and 1.23 (95% CI 1.12-1.36), respectively. The incidence of ED mortality was greater among uninsured children (aIRR 4.96, 95% CI 4.55-5.41) and publicly insured children (aIRR 2.69, 95% CI 2.51-2.88) compared with privately insured children. The interaction term showed no consistent relationship between neighborhood income and insurance with ED mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Children from poorer neighborhoods have greater ED mortality rates than children from greater-income neighborhoods. Improved access to health insurance in the US may lead to reduced pediatric mortality, as ED mortality was greatest in uninsured children. Development of interventions to improve upstream determinants of health that contribute to ED mortality are needed.
Asunto(s)
Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: Inequalities in the health field are caused by the differences in the social and economic conditions, that influence the disease risk and the measures taken to treat the disease. Objective: We aimed to estimate the social inequalities in health in Colombia, according to the type of affiliation to the health system as a proxy of socioeconomic status. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis calculating incidence rates age and sex adjusted for all mandatory reporting events using the affiliation regime (subsidized and contributory) as a socioeconomic proxy. Estimates were made at departmental level for 2015. Social inequalities were calculated in terms of absolute and relative gaps. Results: We found social inequalities in the occurrence of mandatory reporting events in population affiliated to the Colombian subsidized regime (poor population). In this population, 82.31 cases of Plasmodium falciparum malaria per 100,000 affiliates were reported more than those reported in the contributory regime. Regarding the relative gap, belonging to the subsidized regime increased by 31.74 times the risk of dying from malnutrition in children under 5 years of age. Other events such as those related to sexual and reproductive health (maternal mortality, gestational syphilis and congenital syphilis); neglected diseases and communicable diseases related to poverty (leprosy and tuberculosis), also showed profound inequalities. Conclusion: In Colombia there are inequalities by regime of affiliation to the health system. Measured socioeconomic status was a predictor of increased morbidity and premature mortality.
Introducción. Las desigualdades en salud se generan por diferencias en las condiciones sociales y económicas, lo cual influye en el riesgo de enfermar y la forma de enfrentar la enfermedad. Objetivo. Evaluar las desigualdades sociales en salud en Colombia, utilizando el tipo de afiliación al sistema de salud como un parámetro representativo (proxy) de la condición socioeconómica. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un análisis descriptivo y retrospectivo en el que se calcularon las tasas específicas de incidencia, ajustadas por edad y sexo, para eventos de notificación obligatoria, utilizando el régimen de afiliación (subsidiado o contributivo) como variable representativa del nivel socioeconómico. Las estimaciones se hicieron a nivel departamental para el 2015. Las desigualdades sociales se calcularon en términos de brechas absolutas y relativas. Resultados. Se evidencian desigualdades sociales en la ocurrencia de eventos de notificación obligatoria, las cuales desfavorecen a la población afiliada al régimen subsidiado. En esta población, se reportaron 82,31 casos más de malaria Plasmodium falciparum por 100.000 afiliados, que los notificados en el régimen contributivo. Respecto a la brecha relativa, el pertenecer al régimen subsidiado se asocia con un aumento de 31,74 veces del riesgo de morir por desnutrición en menores de cinco años. Otros eventos también presentaron profundas desigualdades, como los relacionados con la salud sexual y reproductiva (mortalidad materna, sífilis gestacional y sífilis congénita), las enfermedades infecciosas y las enfermedades transmisibles relacionadas con la pobreza (lepra y tuberculosis). Conclusión. El tipo de afiliación al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud en Colombia es un buen indicador del nivel socioeconómico, y es un factor predictor de mayor morbilidad y mortalidad prematura asociada con los factores determinantes sociales de la salud.
Asunto(s)
Notificación de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Planes de Sistemas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Causas de Muerte , Colombia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Notificación Obligatoria , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is insufficient evidence in the literature regarding the association between young age and diagnostic delay of breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to determine whether young age increases the risk of diagnostic delays among patients with BC and also to identify the mechanisms through which young age affects diagnostic delay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 592 patients with symptomatic BC treated at two of the largest public cancer hospitals in Mexico City available for the uninsured and those covered by Seguro Popular. A validated questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interviews with the patients, and their medical files were reviewed. Path analyses, using multivariable logistic regression models, were conducted to assess the relationship between age and diagnostic delay, as well as the role of potential confounders. RESULTS: Younger participants (40 years of age or younger) had significantly longer diagnostic intervals and presented with more advanced cancer stage than did their older counterparts. Younger participants more often sought initial health care in private services led by gynecologists, more frequently experienced a lack of cancer suspicion by the first physician they consulted, used a higher number of different health services, and had more medical consultations before arrival to a cancer care center. Younger age was significantly associated with longer diagnostic delays after controlling for education, occupation, lack of health insurance, history of benign breast conditions, type of first health service used, specialty of the first physician consulted, first symptom presented, and benign interpretation of the first breast image study. CONCLUSION: Young age increased the risk of diagnostic delays, which seems to be a result of an increased risk of lack of cancer suspicion at the first health care service consulted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Modelos Logísticos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
More than one in four Brazilians have private health insurance (PHI), even thought it covers mostly the same procedures as the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). This literature review included articles and monographs published since 1990 about the utilization of SUS by privately insured individuals. Considering outpatient care and hospitalization, privately insured people in Brazil use SUS in approximately 13% of the times they receive health care, and approximately 7% of people receiving care paid by SUS are privately insured; these findings vary depending on the type of service studied and on study methods. Utilization of SUS is more frequent in less developed regions, by people with more restricted PHI plans and by people with worse health status. Privately insured people report the limitations of PHI plans as their reasons for resorting to SUS. Sometimes, beneficiaries of PHI plans owned by nonprofit hospitals (which also provide health care financed by SUS) have easier access to care than uninsured people financed by SUS. Anecdotally, privately insured people are satisfied with SUS, but not to the point of adopting SUS as their preferred source of care. In short, for privately insured people, SUS only plays a secondary role in their health care. Despite PHI taking over part of the SUS's health care demand, PHI represents a restriction of the universal, equitable character of the SUS.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Brasil , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistencia Médica/tendencias , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/tendencias , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This article describes the risk of hereditary breast cancer (HBC) in low-income Hispanic women living on the U.S.-Mexico border using the Pedigree Assessment Tool (PAT). METHOD: The PAT was administered as part of the El Paso and Hudspeth County Breast Cancer Education, Screening and NavigaTion program (BEST). Baseline data (n = 1,966) from this program was used to analyze risk factors for HBC. Analysis was conducted to determine significant covariates associated with the presence of any PAT risk factors. RESULTS: The PAT identified 17% (95% CI [15%, 19%]) of the women in the study as having some risk of HBC. Having had a mammogram within 3 years was significantly associated with having any PAT risk factors (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79, p = .006). Women who immigrated to the United States during childbearing age (OR = 0.610, p = .009) or during peri/menopause (OR = 0.637, p = .024) were significantly less likely to have any PAT risk factors. DISCUSSION: The PAT instrument detected a substantial pool of women who may be at risk for HBC. A significant proportion of these women were not up to date mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: The PAT is an effective tool to identify women at risk for HBC and encourage regular screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Americanos Mexicanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Emigración e Inmigración , Femenino , Humanos , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , TexasRESUMEN
Abstract: More than one in four Brazilians have private health insurance (PHI), even thought it covers mostly the same procedures as the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). This literature review included articles and monographs published since 1990 about the utilization of SUS by privately insured individuals. Considering outpatient care and hospitalization, privately insured people in Brazil use SUS in approximately 13% of the times they receive health care, and approximately 7% of people receiving care paid by SUS are privately insured; these findings vary depending on the type of service studied and on study methods. Utilization of SUS is more frequent in less developed regions, by people with more restricted PHI plans and by people with worse health status. Privately insured people report the limitations of PHI plans as their reasons for resorting to SUS. Sometimes, beneficiaries of PHI plans owned by nonprofit hospitals (which also provide health care financed by SUS) have easier access to care than uninsured people financed by SUS. Anecdotally, privately insured people are satisfied with SUS, but not to the point of adopting SUS as their preferred source of care. In short, for privately insured people, SUS only plays a secondary role in their health care. Despite PHI taking over part of the SUS's health care demand, PHI represents a restriction of the universal, equitable character of the SUS.
Resumo: Mais de um em cada quatro brasileiros têm planos de saúde, apesar de estes planos cobrirem majoritariamente os mesmos procedimentos do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Esta revisão da literatura incluiu artigos e monografias publicados desde 1990 sobre a utilização do SUS por indivíduos com plano de saúde. Ao considerar conjuntamente a assistência ambulatorial e hospitalar, os brasileiros com planos de saúde utilizam o SUS em aproximadamente 13% das vezes em que recebem cuidados; aproximadamente 7% das pessoas que recebem cuidados pagos pelo SUS dispõem de planos de saúde (os achados variam de acordo com o tipo de serviço analisado e com os detalhes metodológicos dos estudos). O aumento da utilização do SUS está associado a: regiões menos desenvolvidas do país, planos de saúde com pior cobertura e pessoas com pior saúde. Os brasileiros com plano de saúde citam as limitações dos planos como o motivo pelo qual recorrem ao SUS. Em alguns casos os beneficiários de planos de saúde comercializados por hospitais filantrópicos (os quais também prestam assistência financiada pelo SUS) relatam acesso mais fácil à assistência financiada pelo SUS, comparado com aqueles sem plano de saúde. Pessoas com plano de saúde eventualmente citam a satisfação com a utilização do SUS, mas não a ponto do SUS se tornar a fonte de assistência preferida. Em resumo, para os brasileiros com plano de saúde, o SUS desempenha papel secundário no financiamento dos cuidados de saúde. Embora os planos de saúde pareçam deslocar parte da demanda por assistência para fora do SUS, esses mesmos planos tendem a restringir o caráter universal e equitativo do SUS.
Resumen: Más de uno de cada cuatro brasileños tiene un seguro de salud privado (PHI), a pesar de que estos últimos cubren en su mayoría los mismos procedimientos que en el Sistema Unificado de Salud (SUS). Esta revisión de la literatura incluyó artículos y monografías publicadas desde 1990 sobre la utilización del SUS por parte de personas aseguradas mediante el sistema privado. Considerando atención ambulatoria junto a hospitalización, la población con seguro médico privado en Brasil utiliza el SUS aproximadamente un 13% de las veces que reciben atención médica; además, aproximadamente un 7% de la gente que recibe atención médica pagada a través del SUS tiene seguro privado. Los resultados varían con el tipo de servicio estudiado y con los detalles de los métodos de estudio. La frecuencia de utilización del SUS es mayor en las regiones menos desarrolladas, por parte de la población con planes de seguros de salud más limitados, y personas con peor salud. Las personas con seguros privados identifican las limitaciones de sus planes PHI como la razón por la que usan el SUS. Algunas veces, los beneficiarios de los planes PHI de hospitales sin fines de lucro (que también proveen servicios de salud financiados por el SUS) cuentan con un acceso más sencillo a los cuidados de salud sufragados por el SUS que las personas sin seguro. Anecdóticamente, la población con seguro de salud privado está satisfecha con la utilización que hacen del SUS, pero no hasta el extremo de que el SUS se trasforme en su principal vía para recibir servicios médicos. En resumen, para la población con seguro privado, el SUS juega un papel secundario en la financiación de la asistencia a sus cuidados de salud. Pese a que el PHI parece desviar del SUS parte de la demanda de cuidados de salud, el PHI representa una restricción del carácter universal y equitativo del SUS.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Brasil , Salud Pública , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Asistencia Médica/tendencias , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/tendenciasRESUMEN
In 2004 the government of Mexico initiated an ambitious program, Seguro Popular, to extend health insurance coverage to poor and informal-sector workers. While the program had a protective effect during its early stages, its impact on out-of-pocket health spending over time is unclear. This study used two waves of the Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutricion (from 2006 and 2012) to analyze the protective effects of Seguro Popular and social security programs on out-of-pocket and catastrophic health spending. While, given the endogeneity of Seguro Popular enrollment, we found no link between membership and out-of-pocket health care spending in the study period, we did find a robust, albeit small, link between membership and a reduction in catastrophic health spending. A significant part of overall out-of-pocket health spending goes to purchase medications. Policy decisions are necessary to address gaps in coverage and access to medicines. Improving the quality of care as well as including more clinically effective and cost-effective medicines in the Seguro Popular package could significantly reduce out-of-pocket health care spending in Mexico.
Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro Médico General/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro Médico General/economía , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , México , PobrezaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer hospital morbidity among the local population and the immigrant population in Chile. METHODS: This is a prevalence study based on the analysis of hospital discharges of all the health centers of Chile. Cancer hospital discharges were characterized in 2012 according to the migratory status. The crude and specific rates of hospital morbidity for this cause were estimated for the analysis of their association with migratory status using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, adjusted for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: The neoplasms were the third cause of hospital discharges for immigrants and the seventh one for Chileans. The adjusted rate of cancer hospital discharges was higher for Chileans than immigrants, and the latter had fewer days of hospitalization and greater proportion of surgical interventions. In the group of immigrants, cancer hospital discharges mainly corresponded to patients belonging to the private system (46%), and in the group of Chileans they mainly corresponded to patients in the public system (71.1%). We observed a large difference in the proportion of cancer hospital discharges for patients with no health insurance between the two populations (22.6%: immigrants, 1.0%: Chileans). In both populations, the three most frequent types of cancer were: (i) lymphoid tissue, hematopoietic organs, and related tissues, (ii) digestive organs, and (iii) breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Models of differentiated care should be considered for immigrants, with the creation of specific programs of information, coverage, and protection against cancer. More information on this problem must be generated at the local and international level.
Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Chile/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , América Latina/epidemiología , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/clasificación , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess selected vaccination coverage among adolescents by health insurance status and other access-to-care characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: The 2015 National Immunization Survey-Teen data were used to assess vaccination coverage disparities among adolescents by health insurance status and other access-to-care variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and a predictive marginal modeling were conducted to evaluate associations between health insurance status and vaccination coverage. RESULTS: Overall, vaccination coverage was significantly lower among uninsured compared with insured adolescents for all vaccines assessed for except ≥3 doses of human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) among male adolescents. Among adolescents 13-17 years of age, vaccination of uninsured compared with insured adolescents, respectively, for tetanus toxoid, reduced content diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine was 77.4% vs 86.8%; for ≥1 dose of meningococcal conjugate vaccine was 72.9% vs 81.7%; for ≥1 dose of HPV was 38.8% vs 50.2% among male and 42.9% vs 63.8% among female adolescents; for 3 doses of HPV was 24.9% vs 42.8% among female adolescents. In addition, vaccination coverage differed by the following: type of insurance among insured adolescents, having a well-child visit at 11-12 years of age, and number of healthcare provider contacts in the past year. Uninsured were less likely than insured adolescents to be vaccinated for HPV (female: ≥1 dose and 3 doses; and male: ≥1 doses) after adjusting for confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, vaccination coverage was lower among uninsured adolescents. HPV vaccination coverage was lower than tetanus toxoid, reduced content diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine Tdap and meningococcal conjugate vaccine in both insured and uninsured adolescents. Wider implementation of effective evidence-based strategies is needed to help improve vaccination coverage among adolescents, particularly for those who are uninsured. Limitation of current federally funded vaccination programs or access to healthcare would be expected to erode vaccine coverage of adolescents.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To compare cancer hospital morbidity among the local population and the immigrant population in Chile. METHODS This is a prevalence study based on the analysis of hospital discharges of all the health centers of Chile. Cancer hospital discharges were characterized in 2012 according to the migratory status. The crude and specific rates of hospital morbidity for this cause were estimated for the analysis of their association with migratory status using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, adjusted for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS The neoplasms were the third cause of hospital discharges for immigrants and the seventh one for Chileans. The adjusted rate of cancer hospital discharges was higher for Chileans than immigrants, and the latter had fewer days of hospitalization and greater proportion of surgical interventions. In the group of immigrants, cancer hospital discharges mainly corresponded to patients belonging to the private system (46%), and in the group of Chileans they mainly corresponded to patients in the public system (71.1%). We observed a large difference in the proportion of cancer hospital discharges for patients with no health insurance between the two populations (22.6%: immigrants, 1.0%: Chileans). In both populations, the three most frequent types of cancer were: (i) lymphoid tissue, hematopoietic organs, and related tissues, (ii) digestive organs, and (iii) breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS Models of differentiated care should be considered for immigrants, with the creation of specific programs of information, coverage, and protection against cancer. More information on this problem must be generated at the local and international level.
RESUMEN OBJETIVO Comparar la morbilidad hospitalaria por cáncer entre población local e inmigrante en Chile. MÉTODOS Estudio de prevalencia basado en el análisis de egresos hospitalarios de todos los centros de Chile. Se caracterizaron los egresos hospitalarios por cáncer en 2012 según condición migratoria. Se estimaran las tasas brutas y específicas de morbilidad hospitalaria por esta causa, para finalmente analizar su asociación con el estatus migratorio mediante una regresión binomial negativa inflada por ceros ajustada por variables sociodemográficas. RESULTADOS Las neoplasias fueron la tercera causa de egresos hospitalarios en inmigrantes y la séptima en chilenos. La tasa ajustada de egresos hospitalarios por cáncer fue mayor en chilenos que en inmigrantes, y estos presentaron menor cantidad de días de hospitalización y mayor proporción de intervenciones quirúrgicas. En el grupo de inmigrantes, los egresos hospitalarios por cáncer corresponderán principalmente a pacientes pertenecientes al sistema privado (46%) y en chilenos a pacientes en el sistema público (71,1%). Se observó una amplia diferencia en la proporción de egresos hospitalarios por cáncer correspondientes a pacientes sin previsión de salud entre ambas poblaciones (22,6%: inmigrantes, 1,0%: chilenos). En ambas poblaciones, los tres cánceres que se presentaron con mayor frecuencia fueron: (i) tejidos linfáticos, órganos hematopoyéticos y tejidos afines, (ii) órganos digestivos y (iii) cáncer de mama. CONCLUSIONES Se deben considerar modelos de atención diferenciada en inmigrantes, creando programas específicos de información, cobertura y protección frente al cáncer. Es necesario generar más información sobre esta problemática a nivel local e internacional.