RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The sterilization of surgical drapes plays an important role in preventing infections associated with treatments. At the CNHU-HKM, sterilization procedure for drapes encounters problems. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors associated with the quality of sterilization of surgical drapes at the CNHU-HKM. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study focusing on 20 sterile surgical drapes, 41 agents were involved in the management of drapes and 55 members of the surgical team. The probabilistic method was used for sterile surgical drapes, the non-probabilistic method for the others. Pearson's Chi-square Test and logistic regression were used to find the association, with a significant threshold and a p<0.05. RESULTS: Eighty six point forty six percent of subjects were males with an average age of 42 years. The quality of the process of sterilization of the operative drapes was not good in the two departments responsible for processing the drapes. Bacteriological analysis showed that, out of 20 sterile surgical drapes, 9 had Acinetobacter spp. a multidrug-resistant germ causing nosocomial infections. Multivariate analysis showed that professional experience (p=0.015) and quality control of the procedure (p=0.034) were statistically associated with the quality of sterilization. CONCLUSION: The presence of Acinetobacter spp. on the sterilized drapes demonstrates that sterilization of drapes at the CNHU-HKM is of poor quality. Measures strengthening the skills of providers are necessary to improve the quality of sterilization procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The mini C-arm is frequently used in foot and ankle surgery. However, its continuous manipulation introduces potential means of contaminating the sterile surgical field. A simple and effective draping technique of the mini C-arm is described to minimize risk of contamination and sharps penetration that can damage the C-arm. Levels of Evidence: Level V.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has become a routine and useful adjunct within orthopaedic surgery. However, the fluoroscopy machine may become an additional source of contamination in the operating room, particularly when maneuvering from the anterior-posterior position to the lateral position. Consequently, draping techniques were developed to maintain sterility of the operative field and surgeon. Despite a variety of methods, no studies exist to compare the sterility of these techniques specifically when the fluoroscopy machine is in the lateral imaging position. We evaluated the sterility of 3 c-arm draping techniques in a simulated operative environment. The 3 techniques consisted of a traditional 3-quarter sterile sheet attached to the side of the operative table, a modified clip-drape method, and a commercially available sterile pouch. Our study demonstrated that the traditional method poses a high risk for sterile field contamination, whereas the modified clip-drape method and commercially available sterile pouch kept floor contamination furthest from the surgical field. With the current data, we urge surgeons to use modified techniques rather than the traditional draping method.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Incise drapes adhere well to skin and reduce bacterial migration into the wound. We took skin swabs before and after the application of incise drapes during 49 hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Contamination was detected under incise drapes in four cases (8.1%) and consisted mainly of skin flora. We conclude that it is important to clean the skin again with antiseptics if the incise drape is removed by the surgeon.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the risk of contamination of surgical gloves during preparation and draping in joint replacement surgery. METHODS: During 46 hip and knee replacement procedures, the gloves of orthopaedic consultants (n=5) and registrars (n=3) were assessed for contamination immediately after draping by impression of gloved fingers on blood agar. Contamination was evaluated by the surgeon's grade, the type of procedure, the role of the assistant and the dominance of the hand. RESULTS: A total of 125 pairs of top gloves were examined (79 pairs from registrars and 46 pairs from consultants). Bacterial contamination was isolated on 19 pairs (15.2%) (16 pairs from registrars and 3 pairs from consultants, p=0.04). Coagulase negative staphylococci were the main isolates and contamination was considered low in all cases (1-5 colonies). Contamination was seen more on the dominant hand (16 gloves from dominant hands and 6 from non-dominant hands, p=0.04), on the index finger and thumb. More contaminated gloves were seen in hip arthroplasty procedures (16 pairs from total hip replacements vs 3 pairs from total knee replacements, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Contamination of glove fingertips during draping in joint replacement procedures is more likely to occur among junior surgeons, in hip rather than knee arthroplasty procedures and on the dominant hand. It is therefore essential that surgeons of different grades replace gloves used in draping to avoid exposing patients to the risk of infection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study sought to determine if there was an increased risk for surgical site contamination during stockinette application for a lower extremity surgery draping technique. Utilizing a simulated, sterile surgical field, stockinettes were applied over 10 cadaver lower extremities that were contaminated with non-pathogenic Escherichia coli on the foot. Of those, five specimens were then disinfected with Chloroprep and another 5 did not undergo any disinfection. All the specimens in which the stockinette was applied over a non-prepped foot showed proximal contamination. No contamination occurred in any of the specimens where the foot was disinfected. Stockinette can be a source of surgical site contamination when placed over a non-prepared foot.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Firstly, the essay introduces the definition of bio-burden, the significance of determination of bio-burden and the specific performance requirements. Then, the essay introduces the method selection and validation on the bio-burden determination of surgical drapes, gowns and clean air suits.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical infection remains a significant problem in implant-based breast reconstruction and is a physical and emotional strain to the breast reconstruction patient. Bacterial strikethrough of draping and gown material is a likely source of infection. Strategies to reduce infection in implant-based breast reconstruction are essential to improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine if a disposable draping system is superior to reusable draping materials in the prevention of implant-based breast reconstruction infection. METHODS: This single-institution, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, IRB-approved study enrolled women with breast cancer who were eligible for implant-based breast reconstruction. The primary endpoint was clinical infection by postoperative day 30. Secondary endpoints included all other complications encountered throughout the follow-up period and culture data. Demographic data recorded included patient age, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, chemotherapy, radiation, and follow-up. Procedural data recorded included procedure type, procedure length, estimated blood loss, use of acellular dermal matrix, use of muscle flap, and inpatient versus outpatient setting. RESULTS: From March 2010 through January 2012, 107 women were randomized and 102 completed the study. Five patients were determined not to be candidates for reconstruction after randomization. There were 43 patients in the Reusable Group and 59 patients in the Disposable Group. There were no significant differences in patient demographic data, procedural data, or the type of procedure performed between groups. In the Reusable Group, there were 5 infections (12%) within 30 days compared to 0 (0%) infections in the Disposable Group (P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in secondary complications. There was a trend for positive wound cultures (11% vs. 3%, P = 0.10) and positive drape cultures (17% vs.4%, P = 0.08) in patients with clinical infection. There were no differences in the number of colony-forming units or positive cultures between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Disposable draping material is superior to a reusable draping system in the prevention of clinical infection within the immediate postoperative period. This study did not demonstrate a clear link between intraoperative culture data and the development of clinical infection. A completely disposable gown and draping system is recommended during implant-based breast reconstruction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the timing and type of surgical field contamination in 50 consecutive resections for advanced head and neck cancer with same-stage tissue reconstruction and to analyze the relationship between contamination and the surgical site infection. METHODS: Swabs from the surgical field and from surgical drapes close to the field were taken every 2 hours (at 0 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours) and sent for a standard microbiological diagnostic procedure. Results were recorded in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with SPSS. RESULTS: We collected 336 swabs of which 71% were contaminated. Polymicrobial contamination was observed in 153 samples (45%). Twenty-six species of pathogens were found, the most frequent was Streptococcus species. Surgical site infection with positive culture occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: In head and neck surgery for advanced cancer, standard aseptic procedures do not prevent contamination of the surgical field with physiological bacterial flora of the skin and oral cavity. Although contamination was common, surgical site infection was rare.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).

Évaluation de la contamination bactérienne des champs opératoires après l'utilisation du système de chauffage à air pulsé Bair HuggerMD . Cette étude pilote a déterminé le taux de contamination bactérienne des champs opératoires de patients petits animaux réchauffés lors du processus peropératoire à l'aide du système de chauffage à air pulsé Bair HuggerMD comparativement à une méthode témoin. Les champs opératoires de 100 patients subissant des interventions chirurgicales propres ont été écouvillonnés avec des Culturettes aérobies au début et à la fin de la chirurgie. Les échantillons ont été cultivés sur gélose Trypticase soja. La contamination des champs opératoires a été identifiée dans 6/98 cas (6,1 %). Il n'y avait aucune différence significative dans le nombre de champs opératoires contaminés entre le groupe Bair HuggerMD et le groupe témoin (P = 0,47).(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adhesion of incise drapes is important at the wound edge, where the skin and drapes are contiguous with the wound. Separation of incise drapes from the skin has been reported to be associated with a sixfold increase in the infection rate compared with surgical procedures in which the drape did not lift off. The present study sought to determine whether the choice of preoperative skin preparation affects the adhesion of various incise drapes. METHODS: Following randomization, the backs of twenty-two healthy volunteers were prepared with two skin preparations, 3M DuraPrep Surgical Solution Patient Preoperative Skin Preparation or ChloraPrep with Tint (Scrub Teal) Patient Preoperative Skin Preparation, according to the label directions. Sample strips (12.7 × 76.2 mm) of three different drapes were applied to the prepared areas and were covered with gauze soaked with saline solution for thirty minutes to simulate a fluid challenge. Drape samples were mechanically removed with use of a peel tester based on an international standard for testing peel adhesion of pressure-sensitive tape. Adverse events were monitored and the skin condition was observed. The primary outcome was drape adhesion, measured as the peel strength in units of gram-force. Outcomes were assessed according to drape type and skin preparation with use of mixed-model analysis of variance. RESULTS: Skin prepared with DuraPrep solution had significantly greater drape adhesion (mean peel strength, 181 gf) compared with skin prepared with ChloraPrep (79 gf, p < 0.001). Although maintaining good adhesion is important, an incise drape that has excessive adhesion may cause skin irritation. Regardless of the skin preparation used, the skin reaction at the application site ranged from none to moderate erythema, and in no instance constituted an adverse event that required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the type of skin preparation affects drape adhesion. For surgical procedures in which incise drapes are used, choosing a skin preparation that enhances drape adhesion may minimize drape lifting and the potential for wound contamination.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the microbial contamination of the irrigating fluids at the time of phacoemulsification after the use of topical povidone-iodine and antibiotics prophylaxis. METHODS: A total of 119 patients undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients received 5 mg/mL levofloxacin starting from the day prior to surgery and topical and 5% povidone-iodine drops starting from 30 minutes before the surgery. At the end of each surgery, 2 samples of drainage liquids were sterilely collected from the drainage bags (DBL) and from the peristaltic pump single-cassettes (PCL) of the phacoemulsification machine. Search for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and fungi was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (31.5%) revealed a growth of at least one microbial species (53 DBL and 22 PCL, 44.5% vs 18.5%; p<0.001). Sixty-six patients (55.5%) had at least one positive intraoperative solution. Overall, 111 microbial strains were collected: 82 (74%) Gram-positive bacteria, 20 (18%) fungi, and 9 (8%) Gram-negative bacteria. Thirteen staphylococcal isolates from PCL, compared with 52 out of DBL (11% vs 43.7%, p<0.001), fungi were essentially isolated from PCL. No significant correlation was found between microbial isolation and risk factors. No postsurgical infective complication occurred in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of intraoperative fluids can provide evidence on sources or vehicles of postsurgical infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis and topical povidone-iodine can significantly contribute to minimize the risk of endophthalmitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cotton as well as synthetic textile medical products are widely used as barrier materials and individual protection against displacement of biological infectious factors. The required level of protection of these products for multiple use and disposable multilayer laminates against the penetration of microbes depends on the risk connected with type of surgical procedure defined in normative documents. METHODS. Cotton and syntetic medical textiles for multiple use, 30-times subjected to processes simulating conditions of the use as well as disposable multilayer surgical drapes were tested. Resistance to microbial wet penetration was conducted according to the PN-EN ISO 22610: 2007 standard. RESULTS: The barrier of cotton fabrics was reduced after first washing and then systematically grew after each often cycles to the value close to the value at the beginning. From the twentieth cycle of simulated conditions of the use, barrier index was reduced. The barrier of the synthetic textile stayed on the average level, while multilayer disposable products ensured the full impermeability for the bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Natural cotton textiles for multiple use could be apply on operative blocks in limited range because of the changes of the cotton structure caused by repeated laundering process and sterilization. Synthetic materials also have limited application, although are more resistant to cleaning and sterilization processes. Disposable synthetic laminates with many layers use guarantee impermeability for bacteria and may be applied in operative blocks without restrictions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

By testing the less critical product areas of two different materials, this paper verifies the test method described in ISO 22612.

Asunto(s)