RESUMEN

Introduction: Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone tumor that accounts for roughly 2-3% of primary bone tumors and up to 10-12% of benigns bone neoplasms. It is most commonly seen in young adults, and shows male predominance. Over the last years, minimally invasive thermal ablation techniques such as radiofrequency ablation have gained popularity over classical surgery. In this study we evaluate results and complications of CT guided osteoid osteoma radiofrequency ablation. Materials and methods: In this retrospective cohort study all patients that were diagnosed with osteoid osteoma and treated using radiofrequency ablation between January 2014 and December 2022 were included. Pain was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre and post procedure. Technical success was established as positioning of the radiofrequency electrode in the nidus. Primary clinical success was defined as absence of pain after one radiofrequency session. All patients that required a second radiofrequency ablation were included in the overall clinical success group. Results: During the studied period, 61 osteoid osteoma radiofrequency ablations were performed. Fiftyseven of them were included in this study, 32 were men and 25 female. Pre procedure median pain was 9 according to VAS score. Only 23 patients were treated as outpatient, the rest stayed in hospital for 24 hours. Median follow up time was 21,7 months (SD 8,3). Biopsy was performed in 52 patients. Technical success was accomplished in 57 patients (100%). Primary clinical success was 80,7% (46 patients). Those who continued with pain or had recurrence after a symptoms free period (11 patients), were treated with a second radiofrequency ablation, achieving an overall success rate of 94,7%. Only one patient suffered a minor complication (1,7%). Conclusion: CT guided osteoid osteoma radiofrequency ablation is a safe, effective and low complication rate procedure, that can be performed on an outpatient basis. We believe it should be considered as a first line treatment option for osteoid osteoma.

Introducción: El osteoma osteoide es un tumor óseo benigno, que representa el 2-3% de las neoplasias óseas primarias y hasta el 10-12% de los tumores óseos benignos. Tiene mayor incidencia en adultos jóvenes, con predominancia masculina. En los últimos años las técnicas de termoablación mínimamente invasivas han sido utilizadas para el tratamiento del osteoma osteoide, como alternativa a la cirugía clásica. En este estudio evaluaremos los resultados y complicaciones de ablación por radiofrecuencia de osteoma osteoide. Materiales y métodos: Se analizó una cohorte de pacientes en forma retrospectiva con diagnóstico de osteoma osteoide tratados con radiofrecuencia en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires desde Enero del año 2014 hasta Diciembre del año 2022. Todos los pacientes fueron evaluados con la Escala Visual Analógica del dolor (EVA) pre y post procedimiento. El éxito técnico del procedimiento fue considerado como el correcto posicionamiento del electrodo de radiofrecuencia en el nido de la lesión, y el éxito clínico primario como ausencia de dolor post procedimiento. Mientras que los pacientes que requirieron de una segunda sesión de radiofrecuencia para controlar los síntomas serán incluidos como éxito clínico secundario. Resultados: Durante el período mencionado se realizaron 61 ablaciones percutáneas de osteoma osteoide. Se incluyeron en el análisis 57 pacientes, 32 fueron hombres y 25 mujeres. La media de dolor medido por EVA pre procedimiento fue 9. Del total de los pacientes, 23 fueron tratados de manera ambulatoria, el resto permanecieron internados durante 24hs. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 21,7 meses (DS8,3). Se realizó biopsia de la lesión durante el procedimiento en 52 pacientes. Se logró el éxito técnico en 57 pacientes (100%), de ellos el éxito clínico primario se logró en 46 pacientes (80,7%). Los 11 pacientes que continuaron con dolor o presentaron recurrencia de los síntomas luego de un período asintomáticos fueron tratados con una segunda sesión de radiofrecuencia, logrando un éxito clínico secundario 94,7%. Un solo paciente presentó complicaciones post procedimiento (1,7%), correspondiente a hematoma en la planta del pie. Conclusión: Podemos concluir que la ablación percutánea por radiofrecuencia de OO guiada por tomografía en manos de expertos, es un procedimiento seguro, de alta efectividad y baja tasa de complicaciones que puede realizarse de manera ambulatoria. Por lo que consideramos que debe ser tenida en cuenta como primera elección para el tratamiento de esta patología.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Osteoid osteoma is a benign osteoblastic tumour with a predilection for the lower extremity that rarely affects the forearm. It is commonly seen in adolescents and young adults, and is seldom diagnosed in the paediatric age group. We report a boy in his early childhood who presented with a swelling over the distal forearm, which was incidentally noted by the mother 3 months ago. Plain radiographs showed diffuse sclerosis of the dorsal cortex of the distal radius. CT scan showed a central lucent nidus in the intramedullary region and surrounding sclerosis in the radial metaphysis, confirming the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. The patient was successfully treated by surgical en bloc resection of the nidus and was asymptomatic at 1-year follow-up. Non-specific symptoms at presentation make it a challenge to diagnose osteoid osteoma in children and it needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis when radiographs show lytic lesions in the bone.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) is a widely accepted procedure for treatment of osteoid osteomas. However, the application of CT-RFA was restricted as a result of some drawbacks, such as radiation exposure, and inconvenience in general anesthesia. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-operative TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA of osteoid osteomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 21 medical files of patients who were treated with percutaneous RFA of osteoid osteomas guided by the TiRobot system in our institution between March 2021 and April 2022. The three-dimensional images obtained by a 3D C-arm intra-operatively were sent to the TiRobot system. The puncture point and trajectory were designed. Then the guide pin was positioned to the lesion with the assistance of TiRobot and the biopsy sheath was inserted into the lesion through the guide pin. The tumor was biopsied for pathological examination. Then the RFA needle was inserted into the nidus through the biopsy sheath for thermal ablation. Data were extracted on the associated complications, the reduction in pain at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). A paired t-test was used to compare the pre-operative and post-operative VAS scores. RESULTS: The patients included 17 males and four females with a mean age of 19.5 ± 10.4 years (range 3-45 years). Lesions were located on the femur in nine cases, on the tibia in nine cases, on the humerus in one case, on the calcaneus in one case, and on the acetabulum in one case. TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA was successfully performed on all 21 patients. There was no intra-operative or post-operative complications observed. Pathological diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was obtained in 11 patients, but the other 10 cases were not pathologically diagnosed. The mean follow-up time was 18.8 months (range: 12-26 months).Post-operative VAS scores were reduced significantly in all cases. The mean VAS score decreased from 6.5 pre-operatively to 0.5 at 1 month post-operatively and to 0.1 at 1 year post-operatively. CONCLUSION: As a reliable technique for localizing and resection of nidus, TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteoid osteomas.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a benign lesion characterized by an increased fibrous component in the bone marrow, presence of bone-like structures within the medullary cavity, and a surrounding sclerotic bone rim. Reports on OO located in the posterior proximal tibia are rare. CASE SUMMARY: Herein, we report the case of an 18-year-old male, admitted for the evaluation of right knee pain. The right knee pain had started 6 months prior without any apparent cause, which was notably severe at night, affecting sleep, and was exacerbated while climbing stairs or bearing weight. The patient also experienced pain on flexion. Three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a nodular lesion beneath the cortical bone of the posterior medial plateau of the right tibia and an abnormal signal focus on the posterior lateral aspect of the right tibial plateau associated with extensive bone marrow edema. A small amount of fluid was present in the right knee joint capsule. The patient subsequently underwent arthroscopic excision of the OO. Postoperatively, there was significant relief of pain, and the knee range of motion returned to normal. CONCLUSION: Although OO in the posterior proximal tibia is a rare occurrence, it can be effectively excised through minimally invasive arthroscopic visualization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare the accuracy and effectiveness of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma. Methods: A clinical data of 36 patients with limb osteoid osteomas admitted between June 2016 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 16 patients underwent orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted surgery group), and 20 patients underwent tumor resection after lotcated by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy (open surgery group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, lesion site, tumor nidus diameter, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ( P>0.05). The operation time, lesion resection time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, lesion resection accuracy, and postoperative analgesic use frequency were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS scores for pain severity were compared preoperatively and at 3 days and 3 months postoperatively. Results: Compared with the open surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had a longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less fluoroscopy frequency, less postoperative analgesic use frequency, and higher lesion resection accuracy ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in lesion resection time ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up after surgery, with a follow-up period of 3-24 months (median, 12 months) in the two groups. No postoperative complication such as wound infection or fracture occurred in either group during follow-up. No tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up. The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 3 days and 3 months after surgery when compared with preoperative value ( P<0.05). The VAS score at 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in robot-assisted surgery group than that in open surgery group ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores at 3 months between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with open surgery, robot-assisted resection of limb osteoid osteomas has longer operation time, but the accuracy of lesion resection improve, intraoperative blood loss reduce, and early postoperative pain is lighter. It has the advantages of precision and minimally invasive surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Compare the cost of performing an osteoid osteoma ablation using cone beam CT (CBCT) with overlay fluoroscopic guidance to ablation using conventional CT (CCT) guidance and microwave ablation (MWA) to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: An 11-year retrospective study was performed of all patients undergoing osteoid osteoma ablation. Ablation equipment included a Cool tip RFA probe (Covidien, Minneapolis, Minnesota) or a Neuwave PR MWA probe (Ethicon, Rariton, New Jersey). The room times as well as immediate recovery time were recorded for each case. Cost analysis was then performed using time-driven activity-based costing for rate-dependent variables including salaries, equipment depreciation, room time, and certain supplies. Time-independent costs included the disposable interventional radiology supplies and ablation systems. Costs were reported for each service providing care and using conventional cost accounting methods with variable and fixed expenditures. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients underwent 96 ablation procedures in either CBCT (n = 66) or CCT (n = 30) using either MWA (n = 51) or RFA (n = 45). The anesthesia induction (22.7 ± 8.7 min versus 15.9 ± 7.2 min, P < .001), procedure (64.7 ± 27.5 min versus 47.3 ± 15.3 min; P = .001), and room times (137.7 ± 33.7 min versus 103.9 ± 22.6. min; P < .001) were significantly longer for CBCT procedures. The procedure time did not differ significantly between MWA and RFA (62.1 ± 27.4 min versus 56.1 ± 23.3 min; P = .27). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated lower age (P = .046), CBCT use (P = .001), RFA use (P = .02), and nonsupine patient position (P = .01) significantly increased the total procedural cost. After controlling for these variables, the total cost of CBCT ($5,981.32 ± $523.93 versus $5,378.93 ± $453.12; P = .001) remained higher than CCT and the total cost of RFA ($5,981.32 ± $523.93 versus $5,674.43 ± $549.14; P = .05) approached a higher cost than MWA. CONCLUSION: The use of CBCT with overlay fluoroscopic guidance for osteoid osteoma ablation resulted in longer in-room times and greater cost when compared with CCT. These cost considerations should be weighed against potential radiation dose advantage of CBCT when choosing an image guidance modality. Younger age, RFA use, and nonsupine patient position additionally contributed to higher costs.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability to depict in vivo bone vascularization using ultra-high-resolution (UHR) computed tomography (CT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm, compared to simulated conventional CT, using osteoid osteoma as a model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histopathologically proven cortical osteoid osteoma who underwent UHR-CT between October 2019 and October 2022 were retrospectively included. Images were acquired with a 1024 × 1024 matrix and reconstructed with DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm. To simulate conventional CT, images with a 512 × 512 matrix were also reconstructed. Two radiologists (R1, R2) independently evaluated the number of blood vessels entering the nidus and crossing the bone cortex, as well as vessel identification and image quality with a 5-point scale. Standard deviation (SD) of attenuation in the adjacent muscle and that of air were used as image noise and recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with 13 osteoid osteomas were included. There were 11 men and two women with a mean age of 21.8 ± 9.1 (SD) years. For both readers, UHR-CT with DLR depicted more nidus vessels (11.5 ± 4.3 [SD] (R1) and 11.9 ± 4.6 [SD] (R2)) and cortical vessels (4 ± 3.8 [SD] and 4.3 ± 4.1 [SD], respectively) than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (10.5 ± 4.3 [SD] and 10.4 ± 4.6 [SD], and 4.1 ± 3.8 [SD] and 4.3 ± 3.8 [SD], respectively) and simulated conventional CT (5.3 ± 2.2 [SD] and 6.4 ± 2.5 [SD], 2 ± 1.2 [SD] and 2.4 ± 1.6 [SD], respectively) (P < 0.05). UHR-CT with DLR provided less image noise than simulated conventional CT and UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (P < 0.05). UHR-CT with DLR received the greatest score and simulated conventional CT the lowest score for vessel identification and image quality. CONCLUSION: UHR-CT with DLR shows less noise than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction and significantly improves cortical bone vascularization depiction compared to simulated conventional CT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the accuracy and effectiveness of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma.@*METHODS@#A clinical data of 36 patients with limb osteoid osteomas admitted between June 2016 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 16 patients underwent orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted surgery group), and 20 patients underwent tumor resection after lotcated by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy (open surgery group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, lesion site, tumor nidus diameter, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ( P>0.05). The operation time, lesion resection time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, lesion resection accuracy, and postoperative analgesic use frequency were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS scores for pain severity were compared preoperatively and at 3 days and 3 months postoperatively.@*RESULTS@#Compared with the open surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had a longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less fluoroscopy frequency, less postoperative analgesic use frequency, and higher lesion resection accuracy ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in lesion resection time ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up after surgery, with a follow-up period of 3-24 months (median, 12 months) in the two groups. No postoperative complication such as wound infection or fracture occurred in either group during follow-up. No tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up. The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 3 days and 3 months after surgery when compared with preoperative value ( P<0.05). The VAS score at 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in robot-assisted surgery group than that in open surgery group ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores at 3 months between the two groups ( P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Compared with open surgery, robot-assisted resection of limb osteoid osteomas has longer operation time, but the accuracy of lesion resection improve, intraoperative blood loss reduce, and early postoperative pain is lighter. It has the advantages of precision and minimally invasive surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Osteoid osteoma is one of the most frequent benign musculoskeletal neoplasm. Radiofrequency ablation is the method of choice for non-conservative treatment of osteoid osteoma. Recently, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been proposed as a safer option. The objective of this study is to review the efficacy and side effects of HIFU in the management of osteoid osteoma. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, and Clinical Key until June 30, 2022. Demographic data, baseline characteristics, success rates, pre- and post-procedure pain scores, recurrences, and complications were recorded. Eleven studies were included in this systematic review. Pooled analysis that involved 186 subjects resulted in an overall success rate of 91.94%. Recurrence was reported in two studies, in which it occurred in 4/177 (2.26%) subjects. Skin burn was found in 1 (0.54%) patients. No major or other complications were reported. Three studies compared the success rate of HIFU and RFA. Success rate was slightly higher in the RFA group with insignificant difference (p = 0.15). High-intensity focused ultrasound showed promising results. It offers a safer treatment approach for osteoid osteoma, especially in children, and can be considered for recalcitrant cases after RFA. Nonetheless, more studies are expected in the future.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Recently, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided surgeries have been developed for bone and soft tissue tumors. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CBCT-guided curettage for osteoid osteoma. Our study population included 13 patients who underwent primary curettage for osteoid osteoma using intraoperative CBCT in a hybrid operating room between April 2019 and November 2022. We collected the following data: sex, age, follow-up period, symptom onset to time of surgery, tumor size and location, length of skin incision, operating time, radiation dose, recurrence, postoperative complications, and visual analog scale for pain during the last follow-up. There were 10 male and 3 female patients, and the mean age was 25.0 years (range, 9-49 years). The mean follow-up period was 10.6 months (range, 0.4-24.0 months). The locations of the tumors were the proximal femur in 6 patients, the acetabular region in 2 patients, and the ilium, tibial shaft, calcaneus, cuboid, and talus in 1 patient each. The mean time of symptoms onset to surgery was 18.7 months (range, 2.3-69.9 months). The mean maximum diameter of the tumor was 5.9 mm (range, 3.5-10.0 mm). The mean length of the skin incision was 2.2 cm (range, 1.5-3.5 cm). The mean operating time was 96.9 minutes (range, 64-157 minutes). The mean dose of radiation was 193.2 mGy (range, 16.3-484.0 mGy). No recurrences, postoperative complications, and reoperation were observed in this study. All the patients reported 0 mm on the visual analogue scale for pain on the last follow-up. CBCT-guided curettage for osteoid osteoma was minimally invasive and reliable. This procedure can be effective for the treatment of lesions found in deep locations such as the pelvic bone and proximal femur or an invisible lesion that cannot be detected by regular fluoroscopy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The surgical treatment for osteoid osteoma (OO) in the upper extremity is challenging due to the difficulty in locating the lesion and the crowding of sensitive structures within the anatomy. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of navigated minimally invasive radiofrequency ablation and those of navigated mini open-intralesional curettage in treating these lesions. Nineteen consecutive patients with OO in the upper limb who underwent navigated surgery were included. The average QuickDASH and Numeric Pain Rating Scale improved from 62.2 ± 23.7 to 11.7 ± 16.9 and from 8.1 ± 1.6 to 0.5 ± 1.8, respectively (p < .01 each) following the procedure. Two complications were recorded: one patient had persistent radial nerve palsy, and one patient had transient partial radial nerve weakness. In conclusion, navigation is an important tool in the surgical treatment of OO in the upper limb. A mini open approach to identify and protect neurovascular structures is recommended.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate short-term effectiveness and clinical application advantages of orthopedic robot-assisted resection for osteoid osteoma compared with traditional open surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 48 osteoid osteoma patients who met the selection criteria between July 2022 and April 2023. Among them, 23 patients underwent orthopedic robot-assisted resection (robot-assisted surgery group), and 25 patients received traditional open surgery (traditional surgery group). There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, lesion location and size, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score between the two groups. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative lesion localization time, initial localization success rate, infection, and recurrence were recorded and compared. VAS scores before surgery and at 24 hours, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery and MSTS score before surgery and at 3 months after surgery were assessed. Results: All patients completed the surgery successfully, with no significant difference in surgical time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared to the traditional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter lesion localization time, and shorter hospitalization time, with significant differences ( P<0.05). The initial localization success rate was higher in the robot-assisted surgery group than in the traditional surgery group, but the difference between the two groups was not significant ( P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up, with the follow-up time of 3-12 months in the robot-assisted surgery group (median, 6 months) and 3-14 months in the traditional surgery group (median, 6 months). The postoperative MSTS scores of both groups improved significantly when compared to those before surgery ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the changes in MSTS scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). The postoperative VAS scores of both groups showed a gradually decreasing trend over time ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups after surgery ( P>0.05). During follow-up, except for 1 case of postoperative infection in the traditional surgery group, there was no infections or recurrences in other cases. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Orthopedic robot-assisted osteoid osteoma resection achieves similar short-term effectiveness when compared to traditional open surgery, with shorter lesion localization time.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is among the thermal ablative procedures and provides great benefits with a minimally invasive procedure. In this prospective study, we aimed to reveal the significance of a multidisciplinary method in reducing the recurrence and complications in osteoid osteoma patients with CT-guided RFA performed by a team of experts in the field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of consecutive 40 patients with osteoid osteoma were prospectively evaluated and treated with CT-guided RFA. Before and the post ablation the visual analog scale (VAS) and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) were compared. RESULTS: Post-ablation VAS of the patients at the 1st week and 3rd month after the procedure decreased significantly (p < 0.01) compared to the pre-ablation. The frequency of NSAID use after the ablation decreased significantly (p < 0.01) compared to the pre-ablation time. The pre-procedure NSAID use of our patients included in the study was average 6.93 per week, the NSAID use in the 3rd month post-procedure controls was average 0.53 per week. Recurrence was detected in 4 of our patients, 36 patients had complete recovery. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment method in the management of osteoid osteomas. Radiofrequency ablation has low recurrence rates and provides rapid regression in patients' pain after treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Ribbing's disease is a rare form of sclerosing bone dysplasia characterized by exuberant yet benign endosteal bone, and periosteum formation in the diaphysis of long bones. Diagnosis relies on exclusionary criteria, as the primary clinical manifestations entail progressive pain unresponsive to analgesic therapy, accompanied by serological markers within normal ranges. Pain management constitutes the cornerstone of treatment, with surgery appearing to offer the most efficacious approach, despite the absence of a standardized therapeutic algorithm. The diagnostic and therapeutic delays associated with Ribbing's disease, reaching up to 16 years, exert a profound impact on patients' quality of life. Hence, the purpose of our work is to present a case report of Ribbing's disease and conduct a comprehensive literature review on the subject matter.

La enfermedad de Ribbing es una forma rara de displasia ósea esclerosante caracterizada por una formación exuberante, aunque benigna, de hueso endóstico y periostio en la diáfisis de los huesos largos. El diagnóstico se basa en criterios de exclusión, ya que las manifestaciones clínicas principales implican dolor progresivo que no responde a analgésicos, acompañado de marcadores serológicos normales. El manejo del dolor constituye la piedra angular del tratamiento y la cirugía parece ofrecer el enfoque más efectivo, a pesar de no contar con un algoritmo terapéutico estandarizado. Los retrasos diagnósticos y terapéuticos asociados con la enfermedad de Ribbing, que pueden alcanzar hasta 16 años, impactan profundamente en la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Por lo tanto, el propósito de nuestro trabajo es presentar un reporte de caso de la enfermedad de Ribbing y realizar una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva sobre el tema.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The location and proximity to the spinal cord in spinal osteoid osteoma can increase the likelihood of an incomplete resection. Intraoperative bone scintigraphy (IOBS) can be used to verify location and complete surgical resection. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience using IOBS for resection of intraspinal osteoid osteoma. METHODS: IRB approved, retrospective review of IOBS-guided resection over 10 years. Patients underwent injection of 200 uCi/kg (1-20 mCi) 99mTc-MDP 3-4 h prior surgery. Portable single-headed gamma camera equipped with a pinhole collimator (3- or 4-mm aperture) was used. Images were obtained pre-operatively, at the start of the procedure, and intraoperatively. Operative notes were reviewed. Evaluation of recurrence and clinical follow-up was performed. RESULTS: Twenty IOBS-guided resections were performed in 18 patients (median age 13.5 years, 6-22 years, 12 males). Size ranged 5-16 mm, with 38.9% (7/18) cervical, 22.2% (4/18) thoracic, 22.2% (4/18) lumbar, and 16.7% (3/18) sacral. In all cases, IOBS was able to localize the lesion. After suspected total excision, IOBS altered the surgical plan in 75% of cases (15/20), showing residual activity prompting further resection. Median length of follow-up was 6 months (range 1-156 months) with 90% (18/20) showing complete resection without recurrence. Two patients had osteoid osteoma recurrence at 7 and 10 months following the original resection, requiring re-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: IOBS is a useful tool for real-time localization and assessment of spinal osteoid osteoma resection. In all cases, IOBS was able to localize the lesion and changed surgical planning in 75% of cases. Ninety percent of patients achieved complete resection and remain recurrence free.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Osteoid osteoma is a relatively common benign bone-forming lesion that often occurs in young adults with a predilection for the lower limbs and spine. It is characterized by the formation of osteoid tissue, a precursor to bone, and can cause pain and restricted mobility in affected areas. Osteoid osteoma of the hand and fingers is rare, thus representing a diagnostic challenge. A written informed consent was provided from the patient's father for the publication and sharing all images and clinical data concerning the patient. PATIENT CONCERNS: We are reporting a case of an 11-year-old girl who presented with persistent pain and swelling in her left index finger, as well as limited mobility, over the course of 1 year. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs eased the pain, but it resurfaced once the medication was discontinued. DIAGNOSES: A series of investigations, showed a lytic lesion at the second proximal phalangeal neck, with features indicative of osteoid osteoma. INTERVENTIONS: Excision with bone grafting was performed as definitive therapy with pathological confirmation of the osteoid osteoma diagnosis. Nevertheless, the patient returned 2 years later with a recurrence of her previous symptoms, and further tests suggested a recurrence of osteoid osteoma. To address the recurrence, a modified open thermoablation technique was used. Thermoablation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses heat to destroy the tumor cells, and it has been shown to be effective in treating osteoid osteoma. The modified open approach involves making a small incision to access the tumor and delivering heat directly through a previously CT-guided inserted Kirschner wire to the affected area. OUTCOMES: The patient reported no pain at 1 month and 1 year after the surgery, with no radiological signs of recurrence, indicating complete excision of the lesion. LESSONS: Overall, this case highlights the challenges of diagnosing and treating osteoid osteoma in the hands and fingers. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying causes, potential risk factors, and optimal treatment for osteoid osteoma recurrence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Painful benign bone tumors often adversely influence quality of life primarily due to skeletal-related events such as unremittable pain, pathologic fracture, neurologic deficit, as well as skeletal growth disturbance. Substantial advances in percutaneous minimally invasive interventions for treatment of painful benign bone tumors beyond osteoid osteoma have been established as safe, efficacious, and durable treatments to achieve definitive cure. This article details the available armamentarium and most recent advances in minimally invasive percutaneous interventions and the role of radiologists for the management of patients with benign bone tumors beyond osteoid osteoma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Benign osseocartilaginous tumors of the spine are overall uncommon, representing between 1 and 13% of all primary bone tumors and less than 10% of all spinal tumors. Tumors in this category include osteoblastic lesions such as the related osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, and cartilage-forming lesions including osteochondroma, chondroma, and chondroblastoma. Aneurysmal bone cysts, giant cell tumors of bone, and eosinophilic granulomas also comprise benign tumors of the spine arising from bone. There is significant heterogeneity in the epidemiology, molecular biology, imaging features, and optimal treatment of these lesions. For example, osteoid osteoma is characterized by high expression of the cyclooxygenase enzymes, making it amenable to treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs initially, whereas other lesions such as osteoblastoma may require intralesional curettage or en bloc resection sooner. Generally, en bloc resection is preferred when possible to minimize risk of recurrence. Further, some tumors may arise in the setting of syndromic conditions, such as multiple chondromas arising in Ollier disease or Maffucci syndrome, or as part of genetic disorders, such as osteochondromas in the context of hereditary multiple exostosis. These lesions may present with local pain, cause neurological compromise or be discovered incidentally on routine imaging. The Enneking classification and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini system are routinely used to classify lesions and assist in surgical planning. More novel techniques such as radiofrequency ablation and laser photocoagulation have been applied for the treatment of osteoid osteoma and may have utility in the treatment of other lesion types. A multidisciplinary approach is critical in the management of benign lesions of the spine, and both chemotherapeutic and surgical approaches are routinely used.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel noninvasive interventional technique for osteoid osteoma (OO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRgFUS in the treatment of OO through a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain scores and post-treatment adverse events before and after MRgFUS treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to screen the study literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria to extract and analyze pre- and post-treatment pain score data, success rates (complete pain relief with no recurrence until the last follow-up), recurrence rates, secondary intervention rates, and complications to evaluate the efficacy and/or safety of MRgFUS for OO. RESULTS: A total of 113 studies published between 2012 and 2022were collected, resulting in a total sample size of 353 patients. The majority of the studies were prospective and had a follow-up period of 4 weeks or more, and overall, the quality of evidence ranged from low to high. Pain scores at 1 week and 1 month after the merger were 0.62 (9.5% CI:0.28-0.96) and 0.37 (9.5% CI:0.07-0.68), respectively. The success rate of the combination was 92.8% (95% CI: 89.8%-95.7%), the incidence of minor complications (thermal injury at the ablation site) was 0.85%, and no major complications were recorded in any of the included literature. CONCLUSION: MRgFUS is an effective procedure that is able to treat pain for patients with OO with satisfying efficacy and safety. PROSPERO: No.CRD42023415573.

Asunto(s)