RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric obesity is a growing epidemic. Lifestyle modifications remain central to obesity treatment, however pharmacologic options have gained traction, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). This review aims to summarize evidence on the use of GLP-1RAs in the management of pediatric obesity, physiological mechanisms of action of GLP-1RAs and their role in appetite regulation and glucose homeostasis and address the challenges and special considerations surrounding GLP-1RA use. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of GLP-1RAs, such as exenatide, liraglutide, and semaglutide, in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic parameters in children and adolescents. GLP-1RA's efficacy extends beyond glycemic control to include weight loss mechanisms such as delayed gastric emptying (gastroparesis), and appetite suppression. Semaglutide, the newest GLP-1RA, holds potential for substantial weight loss in adolescents and demonstrates a similar safety and efficacy as seen in adults. SUMMARY: GLP-1RAs may offer a promising adjunct therapy for pediatric obesity, particularly in cases where lifestyle interventions alone are insufficient. However, further research is needed to elucidate long-term safety and efficacy outcomes and to address potential disparities in access to care. Overall, this review highlights the relevance and timeliness of incorporating GLP-1RAs into the comprehensive management of pediatric obesity.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a growing concern, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a significant consequence. Currently, there are no approved drugs to treat NAFLD in children. However, a recent study explored the potential of vitamin E enriched with tocotrienol (TRF) as a powerful antioxidant for NAFLD. The aims of the present study were to investigate the effectiveness and safety of TRF in managing children with obesity and NAFLD. METHODS: A total of 29 patients aged 10 to 18 received a daily oral dose of 50 mg TRF for six months (January 2020 to February 2022), and all had fatty liver disease were detected by ultrasonography and abnormally high alanine transaminase levels (at least two-fold higher than the upper limits for their respective genders). Various parameters, including biochemical markers, FibroScan, LiverFASt, DNA damage, and cytokine expression, were monitored. RESULTS: APO-A1 and AST levels decreased significantly from 1.39 ± 0.3 to 1.22 ± 0.2 g/L (P = 0.002) and from 30 ± 12 to 22 ± 10 g/L (P = 0.038), respectively, in the TRF group post-intervention. Hepatic steatosis was significantly reduced in the placebo group from 309.38 ± 53.60 db/m to 277.62 ± 39.55 db/m (p = 0.048), but not in the TRF group. Comet assay analysis showed a significant reduction in the DNA damage parameters in the TRF group in the post-intervention period compared to the baseline, with tail length decreasing from 28.34 ± 10.9 to 21.69 ± 9.84; (p = 0.049) and with tail DNA (%) decreasing from 54.13 ± 22.1to 46.23 ± 17.9; (p = 0.043). Pro-inflammatory cytokine expression levels were significantly lower in the TRF group compared to baseline levels for IL-6 (2.10 6.3 to 0.7 1.0 pg/mL; p = 0.047 pg/mL) and TNF-1 (1.73 5.5 pg/mL to 0.7 0.5 pg/mL; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence that TRF supplementation may offer a risk-free treatment option for children with obesity and NAFLD. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of TRF offer a promising adjuvant therapy for NAFLD treatment. In combination with lifestyle modifications such as exercise and calorie restriction, TRF could play an essential role in the prevention of NAFLD in the future. However, further studies are needed to explore the long-term effects of TRF supplementation on NAFLD in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered with the International Clinical Trial Registry under reference number (NCT05905185) retrospective registration on (15/06/2023).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) mutations are the commonest cause of monogenic obesity through dysregulation of neuronal pathways in the hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex that regulate hunger and satiety. MC4R also regulates neuropathic pain pathways via JNK signaling after nerve injury. We show evidence of corneal small fiber degeneration in 2 siblings carrying a heterozygous missense variant c.508A>G, p.Ille170Val in the MC4R gene. Both children were treated with once weekly semaglutide for 6 months with no change in weight, and only a minor improvement in HbA1c and lipid profile. However, there was evidence of nerve regeneration with an increase in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) [child A (13.9%), child B (14.7%)], corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) [child A (110.2%), child B (58.7%)] and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) [child A (21.5%), child B (44.0%)].

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The increase in obesity prevalence has been slowing down in numerous countries recently. WHO Europe has organized surveillance of childhood obesity (Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative, COSI) since 2008, which observed the prevalence of overweight and obesity of 6-9-year-old children is followed during this study and proved this result. The study Children's Health 2016 showed that after a period of the global increase of obesity until 2011, there was in the Czech Republic a period of certain stabilization, in which there weren´t major changes in weight. Unfortunately, the covid pandemic changed this trend and the current data from 2021 showed in the Czech Republic a serious increase in childhood obesity. For these children will be necessary to use a new type of treatment of obesity as a surgical and pharmacological specific treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on blood glucose and weight in adolescents with overweight/obesity and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) aged <18 years. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to August 2023 comparing GLP-1RAs with placebo in overweight/obese and/or T2DM adolescents and extracted relevant data for meta-analysis. Results: Fourteen RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1,262 participants. Results revealed that the GLP-1RAs group had a more significant reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; risk difference (RD)=-0.34%, p<0.001) than the control group. However, there was no difference in fasting plasma glucose [fasting plasma glucose (FPG); RD=-2.07 mg/dL, p=0.065] between the two groups. Nonetheless, the experimental group that received exenatide showed no significant reduction in HbA1c (p=0.253) and FPG (p=0.611) between the two groups. The GLP-1RAs group had a more significant decline in body weight (RD=-4.28 kg, p=0.002) and body mass index (BMI) (RD=-1.63 kg/m2, p=0.002) compared to the control group. The experimental group was given liraglutide (RD=-2.31 kg, p=0.038) or exenatide (RD=-2.70 kg, p<0.001). Compared to the control group, the experimental group had a more significant drop in body weight than the control group. However, for the experimental group that received liraglutide, the BMI had a no significant reduction between the two groups (RD=-0.81 kg/m2, p=0.260). For the experimental group using exenatide, BMI declined more significantly in the intervention group than in the control group (RD=-1.14 kg/m2, p<0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that GLP-1RAs reduced HbA1c, FPG, and weight loss in overweight/obese and/or T2DM adolescents. Liraglutide was better than exenatide in terms of glucose reduction. Nevertheless, in terms of weight control, exenatide was more effective than liraglutide.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved liraglutide (glucagon-like-peptide-1-receptor-agonist) as an adjunctive therapy for weight management in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years in combination with a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. The 2023 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy with glucagon-like-peptide-1-receptor-agonist as a second-line therapy in obesity management. Although reports in adults have suggested a link between liraglutide and adverse effects including hepatic injury and acute kidney injury (AKI), these effects have not previously been reported among adolescents treated with liraglutide for weight loss. We present a 17-year-old male who developed AKI and evidence of hepatic injury (significant elevation of hepatic transaminases) after 3 months administration of the lowest dosage of liraglutide (0.6 mg/day) for management of class III obesity. The patient experienced significant loss of appetite, weight loss, and melancholy during the treatment period. One month after discontinuing liraglutide, his mood had improved, his liver enzymes had returned to normal, and AKI had resolved. The Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale suggested a high likelihood of a causative association between liraglutide and his symptoms. Our report highlights the importance of vigilance in monitoring for these potential adverse effects among adolescents treated for obesity with any dose of liraglutide.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent pediatric guidelines recommend clinicians offer anti-obesity medication (AOM) as an adjunct to intensive lifestyle intervention. OBJECTIVE: To investigate pediatricians' perspectives about prescribing AOM, including barriers and facilitators. METHODS: An investigator-developed survey was emailed to primary care pediatric physicians (n = 187) and advanced practice providers (n = 190) within an academic-affiliated network. The survey evaluated how willing clinicians were to prescribe AOM and their agreement with 25 statements about barriers and facilitators. Three vignettes explored AOM decision-making. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine relative risk ratios for willingness to prescribe by agreement with each statement. RESULTS: Among 74 respondents (20% response rate), 24% were willing, 42% uncertain and 34% unwilling to prescribe. Most (64%) agreed that AOM should be managed only by specialists. Willingness to prescribe was associated with clinician motivation and belief in guideline practicality and applicability. Unwillingness was associated with beliefs that patients would not continue AOM long enough for benefit and that there was insufficient time or resources to implement. In vignettes, 52% were willing to prescribe AOM for a patient with severe obesity and metabolic complications, versus 11% for a patient with obesity and possible disordered eating. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to prescribe AOM was low and was associated with perceived practicality and appropriateness for patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Obesity affects approximately 20% of U.S. youth. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are promising lifestyle modification adjuncts for obesity treatment, and topiramate is commonly prescribed in pediatric weight management clinics. It is important to determine "real-world" effectiveness of AOMs and, given shifts towards personalized approaches, characteristics potentially predicting better or worse response. We therefore sought to describe clinical effectiveness from topiramate plus lifestyle modification, and to determine if baseline phenotypic characteristics are associated with better or worse response. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study (2012-2020) among youth (<18 years old) followed in a U.S. academic-based weight management clinic. Baseline characteristics (i.e., body mass index (BMI), liver function tests, eating-related behaviors) and outcomes (%BMI of 95th percentile (%BMIp95), BMI, percent %BMI change, weight) were determined through review of electronic health records and clinic intake survey data. Results: Among 282 youth prescribed topiramate plus lifestyle modifications (mean baseline age 12.7 years, %BMIp95 144%), %BMIp95 and percent BMI change were statistically significantly reduced at each time point (1.5-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month %BMIp95 reductions: -2.2, -3.9, -6.6, and -9.3 percentage points, respectively; percent BMI reduction: -1.2%, -1.9%, -3.2%, and -3.4%, respectively; all p<0.01). Considering multiple comparisons, no baseline characteristics statistically significantly predicted response at any time point. Conclusions: We found that topiramate plus lifestyle modification reduced %BMIp95 and BMI among youth in a weight management clinical setting, and that no baseline characteristics evaluated were associated with response. These results should be considered preliminary given the observational nature of this study, and prospective studies are needed to further characterize clinical effectiveness and identify and confirm potential predictors of response.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the existing limited data related to the use of semaglutide in adolescents with obesity, supplementing with findings from adult studies of semaglutide use. RECENT FINDINGS: Semaglutide, as a once weekly subcutaneous injection for weight management, effectively reduces body mass index (BMI) while improving hyperglycemia, elevated alanine aminotransferase levels, hyperlipidemia, and quality of life in youth with obesity. As of this review, only one large randomized clinical trial of semaglutide in youth has been completed, with a follow-up duration of 68 weeks. Thus, long-term data on the safety in adolescents is limited, particularly regarding the risks of cholelithiasis, pancreatitis, suicidal ideation, and disordered eating. Due to the cost of semaglutide, particularly in the United States, limited cost effectiveness analyses have demonstrated unfavorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for semaglutide relative to phentermine-topiramate as an alternative antiobesity medication in adolescents. SUMMARY: Semaglutide represents an important advance in the pediatric obesity management, with clear short-term reductions in BMI and improvement in metabolic parameters. However, its long-term safety and efficacy for youth with obesity remain to be demonstrated. Additional research is needed to assess trends in utilization and adherence to minimize the risk of worsening socioeconomic disparities in pediatric obesity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal enoxaparin dosing for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients with obesity remains uncertain. We described the mean enoxaparin dose required to attain anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.5-1 unit/mL in pediatric patients with obesity. METHODS: Pediatric patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥95th percentile) who received treatment dose of enoxaparin from 2013 to 2022 and had at least one appropriately timed anti-Xa level were retrospectively evaluated. Daily enoxaparin dose required to achieve an anti-Xa level of 0.5-1 unit/mL was reviewed and compared by the severity of obesity. The correlation coefficients between enoxaparin dose requirement and BMI, BMI percentile, and weight were measured by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Pediatric patients with obesity (n = 89) required a mean enoxaparin dose of 0.8 ± 0.18 mg/kg twice daily to attain a therapeutic anti-Xa level. Children with BMI 95th-99th percentile and weight ≤100 kg achieved the target level on a significantly higher weight-based enoxaparin dose compared to BMI greater than 99th percentile (0.95 ± 0.15 vs. 0.75 ± 0.15 mg/kg twice daily; p < .001) and weight greater than 100 kg (0.95 ± 0.14 vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mg/kg twice daily; p < .001). BMI, BMI percentile, and weight showed a moderate to strong negative correlation with enoxaparin dose requirement. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with obesity required a lower weight-based dose of enoxaparin to achieve a therapeutic anti-Xa than the recommended starting dose of 1 mg/kg twice daily for treatment of VTE. Among obesity indices, weight showed the strongest negative correlation with total daily enoxaparin requirement.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current medical therapies available for treatment of obesity in children and adolescents less than 18 years old in the United States and outline the approach to their use. RECENT FINDINGS: Obesity is a chronic disease with increasing prevalence in children and adolescents in the United States. Over the past few years, more FDA-approved medical treatments for obesity, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists, have emerged for patients less than 18 years old. Furthermore, there are medications with weight loss effects that can be used off-label for obesity in pediatric patients. However, access to many of these medications is limited due to age restrictions, insurance coverage, and cost. Medical options are improving to provide treatment for obesity in pediatric populations. FDA and off-label medications should be considered when appropriate to treat children and adolescents with obesity. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of FDA-approved and off-label medications for obesity treatment in pediatric patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: The effectiveness of anti-obesity medications for children and adolescents is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To update the evidence on the benefits and harms of anti-obesity medication. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP (1/1/16-17/3/23). STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials ≥6 months in people <19 years living with obesity. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Screening, data extraction and quality assessment conducted in duplicate, independently. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Body mass index (BMI): 95th percentile BMI, adverse events and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-five trials (N = 4331), follow-up: 6-24 months; age: 8.8-16.3 years; BMI: 26.2-41.7 kg/m2. Moderate certainty evidence demonstrated a -1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.27 to -1.14)-unit BMI reduction, ranging from -0.8 to -5.9 units between individual drugs with semaglutide producing the largest reduction of -5.88 kg/m2 (95% CI: -6.99 to -4.77, N = 201). Drug type explained ~44% of heterogeneity. Low certainty evidence demonstrated reduction in 95th percentile BMI: -11.88 percentage points (95% CI: -18.43 to -5.30, N = 668). Serious adverse events and study discontinuation due to adverse events did not differ between medications and comparators, but medication dose adjustments were higher compared to comparator (10.6% vs 1.7%; RR = 3.74 [95% CI: 1.51 to 9.26], I2 = 15%), regardless of approval status. There was a trend towards improved quality of life. Evidence gaps exist for children, psychosocial outcomes, comorbidities and weight loss maintenance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anti-obesity medications in addition to behaviour change improve BMI but may require dose adjustment, with 1 in 100 adolescents experiencing a serious adverse event.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of synthesizing existing data on the efficacy and safety of topiramate as an adjunctive treatment for reducing second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-associated weight gain in children aged 4-18 years. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, PsychNet and Web of Science from time of their inception up to 12 February 2024, including randomized controlled trials that compared SGA treatment with and without topiramate co-administration in children. The primary outcomes were changes in body weight and body mass index (BMI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. RESULTS: This systematic review included five randomized trials, totalling 139 participants (43.9% female; mean [SD] age 11.9 [3.5] years). Four of these trials were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 116 subjects. We found that topiramate was significantly effective both in reducing SGA-associated weight gain, with a mean difference of -2.80 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.28 to -0.31; p = 0.037, I2 = 86.7%) and a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.33 (95% CI -2.14 to -0.51; p = 0.014, I2 = 31.7%), and in reducing BMI change compared to placebo (SMD -1.90, 95% CI -3.09 to -0.70; p = 0.02, I2 = 0%). Sedation risk was lower with topiramate than with placebo (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.32; p < 0.01, I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found in dropouts, any other side effects, and metabolic parameters, such as triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose. None of the included studies reported assessments on cognitive side effects. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that topiramate is an effective and safe option for mitigating SGA-associated weight gain in children.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is common among patients with pediatric Crohn's disease (PCD). Some adult studies suggest obese patients respond less well to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. This study sought compares anti-TNF response and anti-TNF levels between pediatric patients with normal and high body mass index (BMI). METHODS: The COMBINE trial compared anti-TNF monotherapy with combination therapy with methotrexate in patients with PCD. In this secondary analysis, a comparison of time-to-treatment failure among patients with normal BMI vs BMI Z -score >1, adjusting for prescribed anti-TNF (infliximab [IFX] or adalimumab [ADA]), trial treatment assignment (combination vs monotherapy), and relevant covariates. Median anti-TNF levels across BMI category was also examined. RESULTS: Of 224 participants (162 IFX initiators and 62 ADA initiators), 111 (81%) had a normal BMI and 43 (19%) had a high BMI. High BMI was associated with treatment failure among ADA initiators (7/10 [70%] vs 12/52 [23%], hazard ratio 0.29, P = 0.007) but not IFX initiators. In addition, ADA-treated patients with a high BMI had lower ADA levels compared with those with normal BMI (median 5.8 vs 12.8 µg/mL, P = 0.02). IFX trough levels did not differ between BMI groups. DISCUSSION: Overweight and obese patients with PCD are more likely to experience ADA treatment failure than those with normal BMI. Higher BMI was associated with lower drug trough levels. Standard ADA dosing may be insufficient for overweight children with PCD. Among IFX initiators, there was no observed difference in clinical outcomes or drug levels, perhaps due to weight-based dosing and/or greater use of proactive drug monitoring.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Whilst glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are effective for treating adolescent obesity, weight loss maintenance (WLM; preventing weight regain) remains a challenge. Our goal was to investigate appetite/satiety hormones and eating behaviours that may predict WLM with exenatide (a GLP1-RA) versus placebo in adolescents with severe obesity. METHODS: Adolescents who had ≥5% body mass index (BMI) reduction with meal replacement therapy were randomized to 52 weeks of once-weekly exenatide extended release or placebo. In this secondary analysis, eating behaviours and appetite/satiety regulation hormones post-meal replacement therapy (pre-randomization to exenatide or placebo) were evaluated as possible predictors of WLM. Percent change in BMI from randomization to 52 weeks served as the primary measure of WLM. RESULTS: The analysis included 66 adolescents (mean age 16.0 years; 47% female). Lower leptin response to meal testing was associated with greater WLM in terms of BMI percent change in those receiving exenatide compared to placebo (p = 0.007) after adjusting for sex, age and BMI. There were no other significant predictors of WLM. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to exenatide, lower leptin response to meals was associated with improved WLM with exenatide compared to placebo. The mostly null findings of this study suggest that GLP1-RA treatment may produce similar WLM for adolescents with obesity regardless of age, BMI, sex and eating behaviours.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paediatric obesity disproportionately impacts individuals from minoritized racial and ethnic backgrounds. Recent guidelines support use of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy for adolescents with obesity, but the potential impact on disparities in obesity prevalence has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To model changes in obesity prevalence with increasing utilization of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy among adolescents. METHODS: Data representative of American adolescents ages 12-17 years were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, cycles 2011 through pre-pandemic 2020. A body mass index (BMI) reduction of 16.7% was applied to each participant based on clinical trial results of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg among adolescents. Utilization disparities were based on utilization of the same medication class among adults. Obesity prevalence was calculated assuming utilization of 10%-100%, stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 4442 adolescents representing 26 247 384 American adolescents, projected overall obesity prevalence decreased from 22.2% to 8.4% with 100% utilization. However, disparities increased relative to Non-Hispanic White youth, with prevalence among Non-Hispanic Black and Mexican American youth ranging from 40%-60% higher to 90%-120% higher, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing utilization of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy may widen relative disparities in obesity, particularly if utilization is unequal. Advocacy for equitable access is needed to minimize worsening of obesity-related disparities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents is increasing, and it is recognised as a complex disorder that often begins in early childhood and persists throughout life. Both polygenic and monogenic obesity are influenced by a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors. Rare genetic obesity forms are caused by specific pathogenic variants in single genes that have a significant impact on weight regulation, particularly genes involved in the leptin-melanocortin pathway. Genetic testing is recommended for patients who exhibit rapid weight gain in infancy and show additional clinical features suggestive of monogenic obesity as an early identification allows for appropriate treatment, preventing the development of obesity-related complications, avoiding the failure of traditional treatment approaches. In the past, the primary recommendations for managing obesity in children and teenagers have been focused on making multiple lifestyle changes that address diet, physical activity, and behaviour, with the goal of maintaining these changes long-term. However, achieving substantial and lasting weight loss and improvements in body mass index (BMI) through lifestyle interventions alone is rare. Recently the progress made in genetic analysis has paved the way for innovative pharmacological treatments for different forms of genetic obesity. By understanding the molecular pathways that contribute to the development of obesity, it is now feasible to identify specific patients who can benefit from targeted treatments based on their unique genetic mechanisms.  Conclusion: However, additional preclinical research and studies in the paediatric population are required, both to develop more personalised prevention and therapeutic programs, particularly for the early implementation of innovative and beneficial management options, and to enable the translation of these novel therapy approaches into clinical practice. What is Known: • The prevalence of obesity in the paediatric population is increasing, and it is considered as a multifaceted condition that often begins in early childhood and persists in the adult life. Particularly, rare genetic forms of obesity are influenced by a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors and are caused by specific pathogenic variants in single genes showing a remarkable impact on weight regulation, particularly genes involved in the leptin-melanocortin pathway. • Patients who present with rapid weight gain in infancy and show additional clinical characteristics indicative of monogenic obesity should undergo genetic testing, which, by enabling a correct diagnosis, can prevent the development of obesity-related consequences through the identification for appropriate treatment. What is New: • In recent years, advances made in genetic analysis has made it possible to develop innovative pharmacological treatments for various forms of genetic obesity. In fact, it is now achievable to identify specific patients who can benefit from targeted treatments based on their unique genetic mechanisms by understanding the molecular pathways involved in the development of obesity. • As demonstrated over the last years, two drugs, setmelanotide and metreleptin, have been identified as potentially effective interventions in the treatment of certain rare forms of monogenic obesity caused by loss-of-function mutations in genes involved in the leptin-melanocortin pathway. Recent advancements have led to the development of novel treatments, including liraglutide, semaglutide and retatrutide, that have the potential to prevent the progression of metabolic abnormalities and improve the prognosis of individuals with these rare and severe forms of obesity. However, extensive preclinical research and, specifically, additional studies in the paediatric population are necessary to facilitate the translation of these innovative treatment techniques into clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe obesity is a complex, chronic disease affecting nearly 9% of adolescents in the U.S. Although the current mainstay of treatment is lifestyle therapy, pediatric clinical practice guidelines recommend the addition of adjunct anti-obesity medication (AOM), such as phentermine and topiramate. However, guidance regarding when adjunct AOM should be started and how AOM should be used is unclear. Furthermore, an inherent limitation of current treatment guidelines is their "one-size-fits-all" approach, which does not account for the heterogeneous nature of obesity and high degree of patient variability in response to all interventions. METHODS: This paper describes the study design and methods of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART), "SMART Use of Medications for the Treatment of Adolescent Severe Obesity." The trial will examine 1) when to start AOM (specifically phentermine) in adolescents who are not responding to lifestyle therapy and 2) how to modify AOM when there is a sub-optimal response to the initial pharmacological intervention (specifically, for phentermine non-responders, is it better to add topiramate to phentermine or switch to topiramate monotherapy). Critically, participant characteristics that may differentially affect response to treatment will be assessed and evaluated as potential moderators of intervention efficacy. CONCLUSION: Data from this study will be used to inform the development of an adaptive intervention for the treatment of adolescent severe obesity that includes empirically-derived decision rules regarding when and how to use AOM. Future research will test this adaptive intervention against standard "one-size-fits-all" treatments.

Asunto(s)