Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29.318
Filtrar
1.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(4): e13378, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39245633

RESUMEN

Robotic surgery has been widely used in surgical gastric cancer treatments, including proximal gastrectomy. Single-port robotic system is gaining more popularity in robotic surgery, but there has been no report on its application in robotic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (RPG-ROSF). Here, we report an RPG-ROSF using a novel single-port robotic system in a 51-year-old male patient with an early-stage gastroesophageal cancer detected by gastroscopy. It took 90 min for robotic setup, 143 min for dissection, and 161 min for digestive tract reconstruction. There was no complication during and after the surgery. The patient was discharged in 8 days postsurgery. The pathological staging of the adenocarcinoma was pT1aN0M0. This preliminary study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of a novel single-port robot in RPG-ROSF.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Masculino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Colgajos Quirúrgicos
2.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(4): e13383, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39238172

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of robotic surgery (RS) for gastric cancer (GC) has been rapidly increasing. However, the utility of RS for advanced GC (AGC), especially T3 or more AGC, is unclear. METHODS: Ninety patients who underwent curative upfront minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (D2 lymph node dissection) for fStage II or III GC were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 68 underwent MIS for T3 or more AGC. Thirty-six patients underwent RS, and 32 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (LS). The short-term and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the T3 or more AGC cohort, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The number of retrieved lymph nodes tended to be higher in the RS than LS group (38.5 vs. 33.0, p = .11). The drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 was significantly lower in the RS than LS group (243.5 vs. 521.0 IU/L, p < .01). The morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2) was similar between the groups. There were no significant differences between the LS and RS groups in the 3-year overall survival rate (80.7% vs. 74.5%, respectively; p = .95) or 3-year disease-free survival rate (75.0% vs. 69.7%, respectively; p = .95). CONCLUSIONS: RS for primary T3 or more AGC was safe and contributed to similar short-term and long-term outcomes compared with LS.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Laparoscopía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Adulto , Tempo Operativo , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 312, 2024 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To analyze the effects of different anesthesia depths on perioperative heart rate variability and hemodynamics in middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia, and to provide a basis for clinical application. METHODS: A total of 111 patients with gastric cancer who were treated with epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia were selected as the study subjects, and the patients were randomly divided into group A, group B and group C. The bispectral index (BIS) was maintained by adjusting the infusion speed of anesthetics, the BIS of group A was maintained at 50 ~ 59, the BIS of group B was maintained at 40 ~ 49, and the BIS of group C was maintained at 30 ~ 39. The high-frequency power (HFP), low-frequency power (LFP), total power (TP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured before anesthesia induction (T1), immediately after intubation (T2), 3 min after intubation (T3), and 6 min after extubation (T4). The cognitive function of the patients was evaluated before and 48 h after surgery. RESULTS: The HFP, LFP/HFP, TP, HR, DBP and SBP between the three groups at T1 ~ T3 are significantly difference from each other (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in spontaneous breathing recovery time, eye opening time and extubation time among group A, B and C groups, and group B had the lowest spontaneous breathing recovery time, eye opening time and extubation time (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions during anesthesia between the three groups. The cognitive function score of group B was significantly higher than that of group A and group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BIS maintenance of 40 ~ 49 has little effect on perioperative heart rate variability and hemodynamics in middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia, which is helpful for postoperative recovery.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Anestesia General/métodos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Periodo Perioperatorio
4.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 236, 2024 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of omentum preservation (OP) on locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognosis of LAGC patients with OP versus omentum resection (OR). METHODS: A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted up until February 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. The primary outcome was to assess the impact of OP on the long-term prognosis of patients with LAGC, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: A total of six case-control studies were included, encompassing a cohort of 1897 patients. The OP group consisted of 844 patients, while the OR group comprised 1053 patients. The study results showed that the OS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.90, P = 0.003) and 5-year RFS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99, P = 0.038) in the OP group were superior to those observed in the OR group. Subgroup analysis indicated that 5-year OS (HR = 0.64, P = 0.003) and 5-year RFS (HR = 0.69, P = 0.005) in the OP group were also better than those in the OR group in Korea. However, the subgroup analysis conducted on stage T3-T4 tumors revealed no statistically significant differences in OS (P = 0.083) and 5-year RFS (P = 0.173) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with OR, OP shows non-inferiority in patients with LAGC and can be considered a potential treatment option for radical gastrectomy.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Epiplón , Neoplasias Gástricas , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Humanos , Epiplón/cirugía , Epiplón/patología , Pronóstico , Gastrectomía/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos
5.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 239, 2024 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) is a laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). It combines laparoscopic gastric resection and endoscopic techniques for local resection of gastric tumors, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), with minimal surgical margins. A conventional CLEAN-NET surgical procedure is complex, requiring careful techniques to preserve the cardia, particularly in case of nearby lesions. We describe the case of a patient who underwent a modified CLEAN-NET approach with a semi-circular seromuscular layer incision surrounding the base of the tumor, different from a circular shape seromuscular layer in the conventional CLEAN-NET: around the tumor to preserve mucosal continuity, which acts as a barrier to avoid intraoperative tumor dissemination. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a gastric submucosal tumor near the cardia, detected on medical examination. The patient was diagnosed with gastric GIST based on the results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Modified CLEAN-NET was performed with a semicircular incision of the seromuscular layer on the opposite side of the cardia, making the surgical procedure simple and minimizing partial resection of the gastric wall, including the tumor, while preserving the cardia. The operative time was 147 min, preoperative blood loss volume was 3 mL, and postoperative hospital stay was 9 days. The resected specimen revealed a minimal resection of the gastric wall, including the tumor. The cardia and gastric nerves were preserved, and the postoperative food intake was good. CONCLUSIONS: The modified CLEAN-NET with semicircular seromuscular layer dissection is a simple and reliable surgical procedure for GIST near the cardia.


Asunto(s)
Cardias , Gastrectomía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Femenino , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Cardias/cirugía , Cardias/patología , Adulto , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Pronóstico , Gastroscopía/métodos , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos
6.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(11): 216, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235478

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) who accepted laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) after neoadjuvant SOX versus SOX plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: LAGC patients who accepted LG after neoadjuvant SOX (SOX-LG, n = 169) and SOX plus ICIs (SOX + ICIs-LG, n = 140) in three medical centers between Jan 2020 and Mar 2024 were analyzed. We compared the tumor regression, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), perioperative safety between two groups, and explored the risk factors of postoperative complications (POCs) for LG after neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups (P > 0.05). SOX + ICIs-LG group acquired a higher proportion of objective response (63.6% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.003), major pathological response (43.6% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.001), and pathological complete response (17.9% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.030). There were no significant differences in the TRAEs rates, operation time, R0 resection, retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative first flatus, and hospitalized days, overall and severe POCs between two groups (P > 0.05). Patients in the SOX-ICIs-LG group had lower estimated blood loss (EBL) compared with SOX-LG (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that more EBL (P = 0.003) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) < 40 (P = 0.005) were independent risk factors of POCs for LG after neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant SOX plus ICIs brings better tumor regression and similar TRAEs compared with SOX alone for LAGC. SOX + ICIs-LG is safe and feasible to conduct with less EBL. Surgeons should focus on the perioperative management to control POCs for patients with PNI < 40 and more EBL.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Laparoscopía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , China/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto
7.
Can Vet J ; 65(9): 906-909, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39219613

RESUMEN

A 7-year-old Korean shorthair cat was admitted to our hospital with chronic constipation. Abdominal ultrasonography incidentally revealed a focal asymmetric gastric mass. The mass was submucosal and hypoechoic without loss of wall layering. Histopathological examination revealed a gastric submucosal lipoma (GSL). Although there have been reports of gastric submucosal fat infiltration in cats, there have been no reports regarding GSL. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the ultrasonographic characteristics of GSL in a cat. Gastric submucosal lipoma should be considered as a differential diagnosis when a focal hypoechoic submucosal mass without loss of wall layering in the stomach is observed on ultrasound images. Key clinical message: This case report describes the ultrasonographic characteristics of GSL in a cat and aims to provide useful information for the diagnosis of lipoma occurring in the feline gastrointestinal tract. The ultrasonographic features and histological results we describe should be helpful in diagnosing submucosal lipoma in cats with similar conditions.


Caractéristiques échographiques d'un lipome sous-muqueux gastrique chez un chat: une étude de casUn chat coréen à poil court âgé de 7 ans a été admis à notre hôpital pour constipation chronique. L'échographie abdominale a révélé de manière fortuite une masse gastrique focale asymétrique. La masse était dans la sousmuqueuse et hypoéchogène sans perte de stratification murale. L'examen histopathologique a révélé un lipome sous-mucosal gastrique (GSL). Bien qu'il y ait eu des rapports d'infiltration de graisse dans la sous-muqueuse gastrique chez le chat, aucun rapport n'a été signalé concernant le GSL. À notre connaissance, il s'agit du premier rapport décrivant les caractéristiques échographiques du GSL chez un chat. Le lipome sous-muqueux gastrique doit être envisagé comme diagnostic différentiel lorsqu'une masse sous-muqueuse hypoéchogène focale sans perte de stratification de la paroi de l'estomac est observée sur les images échographiques.Message clinique clé:Ce rapport de cas décrit les caractéristiques échographiques du GSL chez un chat et vise à fournir des informations utiles pour le diagnostic des lipomes survenant dans le tractus gastro-intestinal félin. Les caractéristiques échographiques et les résultats histologiques que nous décrivons devraient être utiles pour diagnostiquer le lipome sous-muqueux chez les chats présentant des conditions similaires.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos , Lipoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Ultrasonografía , Animales , Gatos , Lipoma/veterinaria , Lipoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Lipoma/cirugía , Lipoma/patología , Enfermedades de los Gatos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Gatos/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Gatos/patología , Ultrasonografía/veterinaria , Neoplasias Gástricas/veterinaria , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Masculino , Femenino
8.
Trials ; 25(1): 588, 2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39232781

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Potentially curative therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer consists of gastrectomy, usually in combination with perioperative chemotherapy. An oncological resection includes a radical (R0) gastrectomy and modified D2 lymphadenectomy; generally, a total omentectomy is also performed, to ensure the removal of possible microscopic disease. However, the omentum functions as a regulator of regional immune responses to prevent infections and prevents adhesions which could lead to bowel obstructions. Evidence supporting a survival benefit of routine complete omentectomy during gastrectomy is lacking. METHODS: OMEGA is a randomized controlled, open, parallel, non-inferiority, multicenter trial. Eligible patients are operable (ASA < 4) and have resectable (≦ cT4aN3bM0) primary gastric cancer. Patients will be 1:1 randomized between (sub)total gastrectomy with omentum preservation distal of the gastroepiploic vessels versus complete omentectomy. For a power of 80%, the target sample size is 654 patients. The primary objective is to investigate whether omentum preservation in gastrectomy for cancer is non-inferior to complete omentectomy in terms of 3-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints include intra- and postoperative outcomes, such as blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, readmission rate, quality of life, disease-free survival, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The OMEGA trial investigates if omentum preservation during gastrectomy for gastric cancer is non-inferior to complete omentectomy in terms of 3-year overall survival, with non-inferiority being determined based on results from both the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol analyses. The OMEGA trial will elucidate whether routine complete omentectomy could be omitted, potentially reducing overtreatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05180864. Registered on 6th January 2022.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Gastrectomía , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Epiplón , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Epiplón/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
9.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 1096, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227821

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of palliative gastrectomy for advanced GC remains a topic of debate. This study sought to establish whether palliative gastrectomy has an impact on prolonging survival. METHODS: We carried out systematic searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the EMBASE databases from database inception to July 2023 to gather studies that examined the connection between palliative gastrectomy and the prognosis of advanced GC. The study employed overall survival as the primary outcome, with the hazard ratio serving as the selected parameter to gauge the association. Subgroup analyses were performed to delve into potential differences within the included studies, categorizing them by study region and sample size in order to examine possible sources of heterogeneity. The stability of individual studies was assessed through sensitivity analysis. The analysis included 20 articles, encompassing a total of 23,061 patients. RESULTS: According to the meta-analysis results, patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy exhibited a noteworthy enhancement in overall survival (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12-1.99; P = 0.006) in comparison to those who did not receive this procedure. There was no association between the type of surgery and the length of hospital stay, as revealed by the analysis (HR = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.84-0.81; P = 0.970). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis, patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent palliative gastrectomy may experience an extended survival duration without a significant prolongation of their hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Gástricas , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Humanos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Pronóstico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(22): e38376, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39259073

RESUMEN

In this study, we aimed to explore the risk factors influencing post-recurrence survival (PRS) of early recurrence (ER) and late recurrence (LR) in stage advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients after radical surgery, respectively, and to develop predictive models in turn. Medical records of 192 AGC patients who recurred after radical gastrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. They were randomly divided into the training and validation set at a ratio of 2:1. Nomograms were built based on risk factors influencing PRS of ER and LR explored by Cox regression analyses, respectively. Concordance index (C-index) values and calibration curves were used to evaluate predictive power of nomograms. Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2, prealbumin level < 70.1 mg/L, positive lymph nodes ratio ≥ 0.486 and palliative treatment after recurrence were independent risk factors for the prognosis of ER. In contrast, prealbumin level < 170.1 mg/L, CEA ≥ 18.32 µg/L, tumor diameter ≥ 5.5 cm and palliative treatment after recurrence were independent risk factors for the prognosis of LR. The C-index values were 0.801 and 0.772 for ER and LR in the training set, respectively. The calibration curves of validation set showed a C-index value of 0.744 and 0.676 for ER and LR, respectively. Nomograms which were constructed to predict the prognosis of ER and LR of AGC after surgery showed great predictive power and could provide reference for clinicians' treatment strategies to some extent.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Estadificación de Neoplasias
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(22): e38409, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39259095

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in older gastric cancer (GC) patients by observing the changes in postoperative intestinal function recovery, nutritional indicators, and inflammatory markers following the surgery. METHODS: A total of 61 older GC patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were selected as the subjects of this study. They were divided into an ERAS group (n = 28) and a conventional control group (n = 33) based on the different management modes during the perioperative period. General data, inflammatory response indicators, nutritional indicators, and perioperative indicators of the 2 groups were collected and compared. The changes in relevant indicators were analyzed, and the underlying reasons for these changes were explored. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in general data and preoperative indicators between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the ERAS group, the inflammatory markers decreased more rapidly, and the nutritional indicators recovered more quickly after surgery. The differences between the 2 groups were statistically significant on the 5th and 7th postoperative days (P < .05). The ERAS group had significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (10.07 ±â€…1.41 vs 13.04 ±â€…3.81), shorter time to first flatus (3.70 ±â€…0.72 vs 4.18 ±â€…1.17), shorter drainage tube retention time (8.96 ±â€…1.53 vs 10.93 ±â€…3.36), and shorter nasogastric tube retention time (3.36 ±â€…1.72 vs 6.14 ±â€…3.99) compared to the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The application of the ERAS program in older GC patients is effective and feasible, and significantly contributes to faster postoperative recovery in older patients.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Gastrectomía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Gastrectomía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Recuperación de la Función , Estado Nutricional , Anciano de 80 o más Años
13.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(9): 1046-1050, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39262003

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transparent cap-assisted blunt dissection (TCABD) in the endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumours (G-SMT) smaller than 2cm, as compared with conventional electronic knife dissection. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised controlled analysis. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China, from July 2020 to 2022. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-eight patients having G-SMT smaller than 2cm were included. They were randomly divided into two groups; undergoing transparent cap-assisted blunt dissection (BD group) and conventional endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE group). The pathology, lesion size in long diameter (mm), operation time, the number of clips used to close the wounds, the number of snare used to resect the tumour, hospital days, hospitalisation expense, en bloc resection rate, and the complications including perforation, postoperative bleeding, and postoperative infection were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean long diameter in the BD group was 9.6 ± 3.6mm, while the conventional ESE group was 10.7 ± 4.5mm. As compared with the conventional ESE group, the operation time, the number of clips used to close the wounds, the number of snare used to resect the tumours, the hospital days, and the hospitalisation expense were all significantly decreased (p <0.05). The perforation rate was lower in the BD group (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: TCABD was effective and safe in the endoscopic resection of G-SMT smaller than 2cm. TCABD could help to reduce the perforation rate, shorten the operation time and hospital days, and decrease the hospitalisation expense in the endoscopic resection of G-SMT. KEY WORDS: Endoscopic submucosal excavation, Endoscopic full-thickness resection, Endoscopic resection, Submucosal tumour, Transparent cap-assisted blunt dissection.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/instrumentación , Gastroscopía/métodos , Adulto , Disección/métodos , Disección/instrumentación , Mucosa Gástrica/cirugía , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , China , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano
15.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 307, 2024 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261751

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive model based on five GLIM variables to predict the individual survival and provide more appropriate patient counseling. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 301 gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing radical resection. C-reactive protein (CRP) as an inflammatory marker was included in GLIM criteria and a nomogram for predicting 5-year overall survival (OS) in GC patients was established. The Bootstrap repeated sampling for 1000 times was used for internal validation. RESULTS: Of the total 301 patients, 20 (6.64%) died within 5 years. CRP improved the sensitivity and accuracy of the survival prediction model (AUC = 0.782, 0.694 to 0.869 for the model without CRP; AUC = 0.880, 0.809 to 0.950 for the model adding CRP). Besides, a GLIM-based nomogram was established with an AUC of 0.889. The C-index for predicting OS was 0.878 (95% CI: 0.823 to 0.934), and the calibration curve fitted well. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed the clinical utility of the nomogram based on GLIM. CONCLUSION: The addition of CRP improved the sensitivity and accuracy of the survival prediction model. The 5-year survival probability of GC patients undergoing radical resection can be reliably predicted by the nomogram presented in this study.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Anciano , Pronóstico , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto
16.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 244, 2024 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39256787

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical T4 (cT4) stage gastric cancer presents with frequent postoperative recurrence and poor prognosis. This study is to evaluate the oncological efficacy of laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy combined with postoperative prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with cT4N + M0 gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinicopathological data of 174 patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy between June 2017 and December 2021. Among them, 142 were included in the non-HIPEC group, and 32 in the HIPEC group. Patients in both groups were paired based on propensity score in a 2:1 ratio to assess disparities in tumor recurrence and long-term survival. RESULTS: After matching, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological data between the two groups. The peritoneum (16.1%) and distant organs (10.9%) were the most frequent locations for recurrence. Prior to matching, the recurrence rates were similar at all sites for both groups. Compared with those in the non-HIPEC cohort, the recurrence rates at all sites, the lung, and the peritoneum were notably lower in the HIPEC cohort. Prior to matching, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups; following matching, the HIPEC group exhibited notably greater survival rates than did the non-HIPEC group. The disparities in survival rates between the groups became even more pronounced after conducting a stratified analysis among patients with stage III disease. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic HIPEC after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can effectively reduce the rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients with cT4N + M0 advanced gastric cancer and significantly improve the prognosis of such patients, which is of great clinical value.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Laparoscopía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Laparoscopía/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pronóstico , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Terapia Combinada , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Adulto
19.
BMJ Open ; 14(9): e083914, 2024 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260840

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is a high-risk cancer with surgical treatments often leading to significant postoperative complications and mortality. Prehabilitation, involving exercise, nutrition and psychological support before surgery, aims to boost patients' physical and mental health. While effective in other cancers, its benefits for gastric cancer need further study. This research will evaluate the impact of trimodal prehabilitation on patient outcomes in gastric cancer surgery, aiming to reduce complications and expedite recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will systematically review randomised controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating the role of prehabilitation in people undergoing gastric cancer resection. The primary outcomes of interest will include overall postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes of interest will include mortality, readmission rate or functional recovery. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database and Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals (VIP) will be searched. All studies will be screened and selected using the criteria described in 'population, intervention/exposure, comparison, outcome and study design' format. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for relevance and methodological validity. Data from included studies will be extracted through a customised, preset data extraction sheet. The Cochrane Review Manager (V.5.3, Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) software will be used to perform the meta-analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this study as all results will be based on published papers. No primary data collection will be needed. Study findings will be presented at scientific conferences or published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023488469.


Asunto(s)
Metaanálisis como Asunto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Ejercicio Preoperatorio , Neoplasias Gástricas , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Proyectos de Investigación , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 333, 2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39231865

RESUMEN

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of robot distal gastrectomy (RDG) versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer. Studies included only those that utilized propensity score matching (PSM). A systematic literature search was conducted in several major global databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, up to June 2024. Articles were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline data and primary and secondary outcome measures (e.g., operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph-node yield dissection, length of hospital stay, and time to first flatus) were extracted. The quality of PSM studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I, and data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. A total of 12 propensity score-matched studies involving 3688 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Robot-assisted surgery resulted in a longer operative time (WMD 30.64 min, 95% CI 15.63 - 45.66; p < 0.0001), less estimated blood loss (WMD 29.54 mL, 95% CI - 47.14 - 11.94; p = 0.001), more lymph-node yield (WMD 5.14, 95% CI 2.39 - 7.88; p = 0.0002), and a shorter hospital stay (WMD - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.60 - 0.12; p = 0.004) compared with laparoscopic surgery. There were no significant differences between the two surgical methods in terms of time to first flatus, overall complications, and major complications. Robot distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer reduces intraoperative blood loss, increases lymph-node yield, and shortens hospital stay compared with laparoscopic surgery, despite a longer operative time. There are no significant differences in time to first flatus and complication rates between the two groups.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Tempo Operativo , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Gástricas , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA