RESUMEN
Background: The incidence of peptic ulcers has decreased during the last decades; the COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced the peptic ulcer hospitalizations. The study aimed to assess the admissions and mortality for complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers and the influence of the pandemic period. Material and Methods: We performed an observational study at a tertiary academic center, including all patients admitted for peptic ulcers between 2017-2021. We evaluated the admissions for complicated and uncomplicated ulcers and risk factors for mortality. Results: 1416 peptic ulcers were admitted, with an equal proportion of gastric and duodenal ulcers; most patients were admitted for bleeding (66.7%), and perforation (17.3%). We noted a decreasing trend for peptic bleeding ulcer (PUB) and uncomplicated ulcer admissions during 2020-2021, while for perforation no significant variation was recorded; a decreasing mortality in PUB was noted from 2017 to 2020. Admissions for bleeding peptic ulcer have decreased by 36.6% during the pandemic period; the mortality rate was similar. Admissions for perforated peptic ulcer have decreased by 14.4%, with a higher mortality rate during the pandemic period (16.83 versus 6.73%). Conclusion: A decreasing trend for PUB admissions but not for perforated ulcers was noted. Admissions for PUB have decreased by more than 1/3 during the pandemic period, with a similar mortality rate. Admissions for perforated peptic ulcers have decreased by 1/7, with significantly higher mortality rates during the pandemic period.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Úlcera Péptica , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Úlcera Péptica/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/mortalidad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Rumanía/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera Duodenal/mortalidad , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Úlcera Gástrica/mortalidad , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Incidencia , Pandemias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in older patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and often accompanies a deterioration of their condition. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is used as an objective indicator to evaluate nutritional status, but relevant research in this area is limited. This study aimed to report the prevalence, clinical correlates, and outcomes of malnutrition in elder patients hospitalized with chronic HF. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 165 eligible patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology at Huadong Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022. Patients were categorized based on their CONUT score into three groups: normal nutrition status, mild risk of malnutrition, and moderate to severe risk of malnutrition. The study examined the nutritional status of this population and its relationship with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Findings revealed that malnutrition affected 82% of the older patients, with 28% experiencing moderate to severe risk. Poor nutritional scores were significantly associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased in-hospital mortality and all-cause mortality during readmissions within one year (P < 0.05). The multivariable analysis indicated that moderate to severe malnutrition (CONUT score of 5-12) was significantly associated with a heightened risk of prolonged hospitalization (aOR: 9.17, 95%CI: 2.02-41.7). CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition, as determined by the CONUT score, is a common issue among HF patients. Utilizing the CONUT score upon admission can effectively predict the potential for prolonged hospital stays.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Desnutrición , Estado Nutricional , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Evaluación Nutricional , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a rare, but debilitating, complication. However, contemporary data from real-world unselected patients are scarce. AIMS: We aimed to explore the temporal trends, outcomes and variables associated with AIS as well as in-hospital all-cause mortality in a nationwide cohort. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of healthcare records from 2006-2021 was implemented. Patients were stratified according to the occurrence of AIS in the setting of PCI. The temporal trends of AIS were analysed. A stepwise regression model was used to identify variables associated with AIS and in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4,910,430 PCIs were included for the current analysis. AIS occurred in 4,098 cases (0.08%). An incremental increase in the incidence of AIS after PCI from 0.03% to 0.14% per year was observed from 2006-2021. The strongest associations with AIS after PCI included carotid artery disease, medical history of stroke, atrial fibrillation, presentation with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI and coronary thrombectomy. For patients with AIS, a higher in-hospital all-cause mortality (18.11% vs 3.29%; p<0.001) was documented. With regard to all-cause mortality, the strongest correlations in the stroke cohort were found for cardiogenic shock, dialysis and clinical presentation with a STEMI. CONCLUSIONS: In an unselected nationwide cohort of patients hospitalised for PCI, a gradual increase in AIS incidence was noted. We identified several variables associated with AIS as well as with in-hospital mortality. Hereby, clinicians might identify the patient population at risk for a peri-interventional AIS as well as those at risk for an adverse in-hospital outcome after PCI.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incidencia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
AIMS: This study aims to compare the trends in the quality of hospital care for WHO's three disease groups pre-, during, and post-COVID-19 pandemic peak in Thailand. METHODS: The study utilized existing hospital admission data from the Thai Health Information Portal (THIP) database, covering the period from 2017 to 2022. We categorized WHO's three disease groups: poverty-related, noncommunicable, and injury groups using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 of initial admission of patients, and we analyzed three major outcomes: prolonged (≥ 90th percentile) length of stay (LOS), hospital mortality, and readmission pre-, during, and post-COVID-19 pandemic peak. Relative weight (RW) of hospital reimbursements was used as a surrogate measure of the severity of the diseases. RESULTS: The average prolonged LOS of patients with poverty disease pre-, during, and post-COVID-19 pandemic peak were 7.1%, 10.8%, 9.05%, respectively. Respective hospital mortality rates were 5.02%, 6.22%, 6.05% and readmission were 6.98/1,000, 6.16/1,000, 5.43/1,000, respectively. For non-communicable diseases, the respective proportions in the prolonged LOS were 9.0%, 9.12%, and 7.58%, with respective hospital mortality being 10.65%, 8.86%, 6.62%, and readmissions were 17.79/1,000, 13.94/1,000, 13.19/1,000, respectively. The respective prolonged LOS for injuries were 8.75%, 8.55%, 8.25%. Meanwhile, respective hospital mortality were 4.95%, 4.05%, 3.20%, and readmissions were 1.99/1,000, 1.60/1,000, 1.48/1,000, respectively. The RW analysis reveals diverse impacts on resource utilization and costs. Most poverty-related and noncommunicable diseases indicate increased resource requirements and associated costs, except for HIV/AIDS and diabetes mellitus, showing mixed trends. In injuries, road traffic accidents consistently decrease resource needs and costs, but suicide cases show mixed trends. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 had a more serious impact, especially prolonged LOS and hospital mortality for poverty-related diseases more than noncommunicable diseases and injuries.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Readmisión del Paciente , Pobreza , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , Tailandia/epidemiología , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/mortalidad , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/epidemiología , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Masculino , Femenino , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , PandemiasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The proportion of very elderly patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is expected to rise. Furthermore, patients are likely more prone to suffer a cardiac arrest (CA) event within the ICU. The occurrence of intensive care unit cardiac arrest (ICU-CA) is associated with high mortality. To date, the incidence of ICU-CA and its clinical impact on outcome in the very old (≥ 90 years) patients treated is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive critically ill patients ≥ 90 years admitted to the ICU of a tertiary care university hospital in Hamburg (Germany). All patients suffering ICU-CA were included and CA characteristics and functional outcome was assessed. Clinical course and outcome were assessed and compared between the subgroups of patients with and without ICU-CA. RESULTS: 1,108 critically ill patients aged ≥ 90 years were admitted during the study period. The median age was 92.3 (91.0-94.2) years and 67% (n = 747) were female. 2% (n = 25) of this cohort suffered ICU-CA after a median duration 0.5 (0.2-3.2) days of ICU admission. The presumed cause of ICU-CA was cardiac in 64% (n = 16). The median resuscitation time was 10 (2-15) minutes and the initial rhythm was shockable in 20% (n = 5). Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) could be achieved in 68% (n = 17). The cause of ICU admission was primarily medical in the total cohort (ICU-CA: 48% vs. No ICU-CA: 34%, p = 0.13), surgical - planned (ICU-CA: 32% vs. No ICU-CA: 37%, p = 0.61) and surgical - unplanned/emergency (ICU-CA: 43% vs. No ICU-CA: 28%, p = 0.34). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2 (1-3) points for patients with ICU-CA and 1 (0-2) for patients without ICU-CA (p = 0.54). Patients with ICU-CA had a higher disease severity according to SAPS II (ICU-CA: 54 vs. No ICU-CA: 36 points, p < 0.001). Patients with ICU-CA had a higher rate of mechanically ventilation (ICU-CA: 64% vs. No ICU-CA: 34%, p < 0.01) and required vasopressor therapy more often (ICU-CA: 88% vs. No ICU-CA: 41%, p < 0.001). The ICU and in-hospital mortality was 88% (n = 22) and 100% (n = 25) in patients with ICU-CA compared to 17% (n = 179) and 28% (n = 306) in patients without ICU-CA. The mortality rate for patients with ICU-CA was observed to be 88% (n = 22) in the ICU and 100% (n = 25) in-hospital. In contrast, patients without ICU-CA had an in-ICU mortality rate of 17% (n = 179) and an in-hospital mortality rate of 28% (n = 306) (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ICU-CA in very elderly patients is rare but associated with high mortality. Providing CPR in this cohort did not lead to long-term survival at our centre. Very elderly patients admitted to the ICU likely benefit from supportive care only and should probably not be resuscitated due to poor chance of survival and ethical considerations. Providing personalized assurances that care will remain appropriate and in accordance with the patient's and family's wishes can optimise compassionate care while avoiding futile life-sustaining interventions.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Enfermedad Crítica , Paro Cardíaco , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Alemania/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , IncidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Too high or too low patient volumes and work amounts may overwhelm health care professionals and obstruct processes or lead to inadequate personnel routine and process flow. We sought to evaluate, whether an association between current caseload, current workload, and outcomes exists in intensive care units (ICU). METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of data from an Austrian ICU registry. Data on patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted to 144 Austrian ICUs between 2013 and 2022 were included. A Cox proportional hazards model with ICU mortality as the outcome of interest adjusted with patients' respective SAPS 3, current ICU caseload (measured by ICU occupancy rates), and current ICU workload (measured by median TISS-28 per ICU) as time-dependent covariables was constructed. Subgroup analyses were performed for types of ICUs, hospital care level, and pre-COVID or intra-COVID period. RESULTS: 415 584 patient admissions to 144 ICUs were analysed. Compared to ICU caseloads of 76 to 100%, there was no significant relationship between overuse of ICU capacity and risk of death [HR (95% CI) 1.06 (0.99-1.15), p = 0.110 for > 100%], but for lower utilisation [1.09 (1.02-1.16), p = 0.008 for ≤ 50% and 1.10 (1.05-1.15), p < 0.0001 for 51-75%]. Exceptions were significant associations for caseloads > 100% between 2020 and 2022 [1.18 (1.06-1.30), p = 0.001], i.e., the intra-COVID period. Compared to the reference category of median TISS-28 21-30, lower [0.88 (0.78-0.99), p = 0.049 for ≤ 20], but not higher workloads were significantly associated with risk of death. High workload may be associated with higher mortality in local hospitals [1.09 (1.01-1.19), p = 0.035 for 31-40, 1.28 (1.02-1.60), p = 0.033 for > 40]. CONCLUSIONS: In a system with comparably high intensive care resources and mandatory staffing levels, patients' survival chances are generally not affected by high intensive care unit caseload and workload. However, extraordinary circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may lead to higher risk of death, if planned capacities are exceeded. High workload in ICUs in smaller hospitals with lower staffing levels may be associated with increased risk of death.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Sistema de Registros , Carga de Trabajo , Humanos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Masculino , Femenino , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Austria/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , AdultoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Emergency physicians are always faced with the challenge of choosing the appropriate disposition for elderly patients in order to ensure an acceptable care plan and effective use of resources. A clinical decision rule, Geriatric Fever Score (GFS) has been proposed but not validated to help ED physicians with decision-making. This rule employs leukocytosis, severe coma, and thrombocytopenia as predictors of 30-day mortality. Through our study determines the performance of this clinical prediction rule in a prospective study in a setting different from where it was developed. METHOD AND MATERIALS: In this prospective cohort study in a 1200-bed tertiary care, patients older than 65 years old who visited the ED with fever were enrolled. All elements of the rule were collected and the total score was calculated for each patient. Patients were also categorized as low risk (score 0-1) or high risk (score ≥ 2). Thirty-day follow-up was performed to determine the patient outcome (survival or mortality). RESULTS: A total of 296 patients were included in our final analysis. The mortality rate was 33.1% for patients with a Score of 0, 42.1% for a score of 1, 57.1% for a score of 2, and 100% for a score of 3. When divided into two risk groups, patients' mortality rates were as follows: low risk group 37.9% and high-risk group 40.5%. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that elderly patients who present to ED with fever and have a score of 2 or higher on the Geriatric Fever Score are at higher risk of mortality at 30 days.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fiebre , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Fiebre/mortalidad , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Reglas de Decisión Clínica , Estudios de Cohortes , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendenciasRESUMEN
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a serious complication of heart attack and constitutes one of its main causes of death. To date, there is no data on its treatment and evolution in Latin America. OBJECTIVES: To know the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, evolution and in-hospital mortality of CS in Latin America. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter registry of patients hospitalized with CS in the context of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with and without ST segment elevation for 24 months. RESULTS: 41 Latin American centers participated incorporating patients during the period between October 2021 and September 2023. 278 patients were included. Age: 66 (59-75) years, 70.1 % men. 74.8 % of the cases correspond to ACS with ST elevation, 14.4 % to ACS without ST elevation, 5.7 % to right ventricular infarction and 5.1 % to mechanical complications. CS was present from admission in 60 % of cases. Revascularization: 81.3 %, inotropic use: 97.8 %, ARM: 52.5 %, Swan Ganz: 17 %, intra-aortic balloon pump: 22.2 %. Overall in-hospital mortality was 52.7 %, with no differences between ACS with or without ST. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality is very high despite the high reperfusion used.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Sistema de Registros , Choque Cardiogénico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/estadística & datos numéricos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/métodos , América Latina/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Choque Cardiogénico/epidemiología , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Liver cirrhosis is an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with a heavy load on healthcare systems. We analysed the trends in hospitalisations for cirrhosis in Switzerland. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Large nationwide inpatient database, years between 1998 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalisations for cirrhosis of adult patients were selected. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospitalisations with either a primary diagnosis of cirrhosis or a cirrhosis-related primary diagnosis with a mandatory presence of cirrhosis as a secondary diagnosis were considered following the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes. Trends in demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were analysed. Causes and costs of cirrhosis-related hospitalisations were available from 2012 onwards. RESULTS: Cirrhosis-related hospitalisations increased from 1631 in 1998 to 4052 in 2020. Of the patients, 68.7% were men. Alcohol-related liver disease was the leading cause, increasing from 44.1% (95% CI, 42.4% to 45.9%) in 2012 to 47.9% (95% CI, 46.4% to 49.5%) in 2020. Assessed by exclusion of other coded causes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was the second cause at 42.7% (95% CI, 41.2% to 44.3%) in 2020. Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis decreased from 12.3% (95% CI, 11.2% to 13.5%) in 2012 to 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7% to 3.8%) in 2020. Median length of stay decreased from 11 to 8 days. Hospitalisations with an intensive care unit stay increased from 9.8% (95% CI, 8.4% to 11.4%) to 15.6% (95% CI, 14.5% to 16.8%). In-hospital mortality decreased from 12.1% (95% CI, 10.5% to 13.8%) to 9.7% (95% CI, 8.8% to 10.7%). Total costs increased from 54.4 million US$ (51.4 million ) in 2012 to 92.6 million US$ (87.5 million ) in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis-related hospitalisations and related costs increased in Switzerland from 1998 to 2020 but in-hospital mortality decreased. Alcohol-related liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease were the most prevalent and preventable aetiologies of cirrhosis-related hospitalisations.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Cirrosis Hepática , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Suiza/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cerebral perfusion may change depending on arterial cannulation site and may affect the incidence of neurologic adverse events in post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The current study compares patients' neurologic outcomes with three commonly used arterial cannulation strategies (aortic vs. subclavian/axillary vs. femoral artery) to evaluate if each ECLS configuration is associated with different rates of neurologic complications. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter (34 centers), observational study included adults requiring post-cardiotomy ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020 present in the Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS) Study database. Patients with Aortic, Subclavian/Axillary and Femoral cannulation were compared on the incidence of a composite neurological end-point (ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, brain edema). Secondary outcomes were overall in-hospital mortality, neurologic complications as cause of in-hospital death, and post-operative minor neurologic complications (seizures). Association between cannulation and neurological outcomes were investigated through linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: This study included 1897 patients comprising 26.5% Aortic (n = 503), 20.9% Subclavian/Axillary (n = 397) and 52.6% Femoral (n = 997) cannulations. The Subclavian/Axillary group featured a more frequent history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, dialysis, peripheral artery disease and previous stroke. Neuro-monitoring was used infrequently in all groups. Major neurologic complications were more frequent in Subclavian/Axillary (Aortic: n = 79, 15.8%; Subclavian/Axillary: n = 78, 19.6%; Femoral: n = 118, 11.9%; p < 0.001) also after mixed-effects model adjustment (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.02-2.31], p = 0.041). Seizures were more common in Subclavian/Axillary (n = 13, 3.4%) than Aortic (n = 9, 1.8%) and Femoral cannulation (n = 12, 1.3%, p = 0.036). In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation (Aortic: n = 344, 68.4%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 223, 56.2%, Femoral: n = 587, 58.9%, p < 0.001), as shown by Kaplan-Meier curves. Anyhow, neurologic cause of death (Aortic: n = 12, 3.9%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 14, 6.6%, Femoral: n = 28, 5.0%, p = 0.433) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the PELS Study, Subclavian/Axillary cannulation was associated with higher rates of major neurologic complications and seizures. In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation, despite no significant differences in incidence of neurological cause of death in these patients. These results encourage vigilance for neurologic complications and neuromonitoring use in patients on ECLS, especially with Subclavian/Axillary cannulation.
Asunto(s)
Aorta , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Arteria Femoral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Adulto , Arteria Subclavia , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery dissection is managed primarily conservatively with serial imaging or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Exposure to contrast in either modality could potentially result in acute tubular necrosis (ATN). However, no data compares ATN incidence in these management strategies. This study compares the incidence of ATN and associated mortality of PCI and conservative management of coronary artery dissection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the National Inpatient Sample database, including patients with coronary artery dissection between 2016 through 2020. We analyzed the incidence of ATN and associated mortality of PCI and conservative management of coronary artery dissection. RESULTS: We found that the odds of developing ATN were 22% lower in patients managed with PCI than those managed conservatively. There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality or hospital length of stay between the two groups but the mortality rate in patients with ATN was double that of those who did not develop ATN in both PCI and conservatively managed groups. CONCLUSIONS: The higher incidents of ATN in patients with coronary dissection being managed with conservative measures compared to PCI suggest that the use of CTA may be harmful. Additionally, persons who developed ATN may have higher mortality. Therefore, more studies in the management of coronary artery dissection need to be done which would allow further steps to be taken to reduce this harm.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Masculino , Femenino , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/epidemiología , Necrosis Tubular Aguda/epidemiología , Aneurisma Coronario/epidemiología , Aneurisma Coronario/etiología , Aneurisma Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Sex differences in the outcomes and management of cardiogenic shock are not well established. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the differences inik cardiogenic shock outcomes between males and females. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Studies were searched via the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to December 2022. RESULTS: The analysis included 24 studies comprising 1,567,660 patients. Compared to females, males with CS had a significantly lower risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.88, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (RR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.89-0.92, p < 0.001). Males were more likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.13-1.31, p < 0.0001) and intra-aortic balloon pump placement (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.11-1.32, p < 0.0001), with no significant sex differences in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella. During the index hospitalization, males were at higher risk of arrhythmias (RR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.05-1.34, p = 0.003) and less likely to develop acute kidney injury (RR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.79-0.94, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Men have a lower all-cause mortality risk in cardiogenic shock. Addressing disparities in management is crucial for improving CS outcomes, especially for women.
Asunto(s)
Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Factores Sexuales , Femenino , Masculino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/métodos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about impact of age and comorbidities on outcome in patients with leadless pacemakers (LPM) is limited. OBJECTIVES: To analyse outcome in LPM patients according to age and comorbidities. METHODS: This Swiss, multi-centre, retrospective analysis includes all patients with LPM implanted between 2015 and 2022. Charlson-Comorbidity-Index (CCI) was determined and patients were divided into a low- (CCI ≤ 5) and high-comorbidity (CCI > 5) group. Peri-procedural complications, in-hospital death, and all-cause mortalities were assessed. Finally, all-cause mortality according to three groups (CCI ≤ 3, 4-5, >5) was compared to age and sex-adjusted mortality in the general Swiss population. RESULTS: 863 patients (median age 81 years, 65% male, 42% with CCI > 5) were included. Peri-procedural/long-term complication rates did not differ between the low- vs. high-comorbidity groups (2.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.48 and 1.2% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.12, respectively). In-hospital (3.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.002) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.9, 95%CI 2.2-3.8, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the high-comorbidity group resulting in a three-year mortality of 58% (95%CI 51-65%) vs. 22% (95%CI 17-27%) in the low-comorbidity group. In patients with a CCI ≤ 3, all-cause mortality was comparable to the age- and sex-adjusted mortality of the general Swiss population. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with high comorbidity, LPM implantation was not associated with increased peri-procedural/long-term complications. All-cause mortality in LPM patients with a CCI ≤ 3 was comparable to age- and sex-adjusted mortality in the general Swiss population. Despite a relatively high three-year mortality due to competing risk factors, LPM implantation is safe, even in elderly patients with high comorbidity. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In this Swiss, multi-centre, retrospective cohort analysis, 863 patients implanted with a leadless pacemaker were included and divided into a high-comorbidity (with a CCI > 5) and low-comorbidity (with a CCI ≤ 5) group. There was no between group difference in terms of implantation outcomes and peri-operative or long-term complications. Furthermore, all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with a CCI ≤ 3 was comparable to age- and sex-adjusted mortality in the general Swiss population. These data indicate that LPM implantation is a safe procedure, even in elderly patients with high comorbidity.
Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Esperanza de Vida , Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/tendencias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Suiza/epidemiología , Esperanza de Vida/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendenciasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute transient nonischemic cardiomyopathy often characterized by its hallmark feature of left ventricular apical ballooning. The correlation between racial backgrounds and the prognosis of individuals with TTS remains poorly defined. Our study aimed to explore the influence of race on the trends, clinical presentations, and outcomes in patients diagnosed with TTS. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 and identified hospitalizations with TTS. We compared the clinical features and outcomes across three different races - non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic population. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 76,505 weighted hospitalizations for TTS were identified, of which 65,495 (85.6%) were non-Hispanic White, 5,830 (7.6%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 5,180 (6.8%) were Hispanics. After propensity-score matching, NHB patients had higher odds of acute kidney injury (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.84, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.68, p = 0.02). Hispanic patients had a higher incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis when compared to NHW patients (OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.11-5.77, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality between NHB and Hispanic patients when compared to NHW patients. Notably, Hispanic populations experienced a higher mortality rate during the COVID-19 period. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested significant differences in the outcomes of TTS across different racial groups. Hispanic populations experienced a higher mortality rate with TTS during the COVID-19 era. Further research should emphasize discovering the factors contributing to the observed disparities.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo , Humanos , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/etnología , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/epidemiología , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/etnología , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2 , IncidenciaRESUMEN
As cannabis use is rising and federal restrictions are easing, it is important to recognize its potential adverse cardiovascular effects for better risk stratification and informed guidance. We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019, where 39,992 subjects were enrolled. The extracted population was classified into two groups based on the presence of cannabis-related disorders. The primary outcomes of the study were cardiovascular-related adverse events, in-hospital mortality, total cost of hospitalization, and cardiac dysrhythmias. The study concluded that cannabis use disorder was not significantly associated with the likelihood of having a cardiovascular adverse event, cardiac dysrhythmias, or with the cost of hospitalization when controlling for other variables (p = 0.257, p=0.481 & p = 0.481, respectively). However, it was significantly associated with the likelihood of mortality (p < 0.0001). Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and elaborate on identified associations.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Arritmias Cardíacas/economía , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Adulto , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Abuso de Marihuana/economía , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to grow in the United States. There are limited data on recipients of solid organ transplant (SOT) and patients with liver cirrhosis who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR). Our study aims to evaluate outcomes in these populations. Using the national readmission database (2016 to 2020), we identified recipients of SOT and patients with liver cirrhosis without previous liver transplants who were admitted for severe aortic stenosis and underwent either TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR). We used multivariable regression for adjusted analysis and the propensity score matching model, implementing complete Mahalanobis distance matching within the Propensity Score Caliper (0.2) to match TAVR and SAVR cohorts for outcomes. Of 3,394 hospitalizations for AVR in recipients of SOT, 2,181 underwent TAVR, and 1,213 underwent SAVR. On propensity-matched analysis, SAVR was associated with more adverse events than was TAVR, including in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs 1.1%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.49, p <0.001), acute kidney injury (43.7% vs 10.2%, p <0.001), cardiogenic shock (9.0% vs 1.6%, p <0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (15.9 vs 6.0%, p <0.001), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (28% vs 10.4%, p <0.001), and net adverse events (72.8 vs 37.6%, p <0.001). A greater median length of stay (10 vs 2 days, p <0.001) and adjusted cost ($80,842 vs $57,014, p <0.001) were also observed. The readmission rates were the same for both cohorts after a 6-month follow-up. Similarly, in 14,763 hospitalizations for AVR in liver cirrhosis, 7,109 patients underwent TAVR, and 7,654 underwent SAVR. In propensity-matched cohorts (n = 2,341), SAVR was found to be associated with greater adverse events, including in-hospital mortality (19.8% vs 10%), stroke (6.7% vs 2%), acute kidney injury (67.7% vs 30.3%), cardiogenic shock (41.9% vs 19.9%), sudden cardiac arrest (31.8% vs 13.2%, aOR 2.89), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (66.2% vs 35.7%), and net adverse events (86% vs 59.5%) (p <0.001). A greater median length of stay (16 vs 3 days) and cost ($500,218 vs $263,383) were also observed (p <0.001). However, the rate of readmissions at 30-day (9% vs 11.1%) and 180-day intervals (33.4% vs 39.8%) was lower for the SAVR cohort (p <0.05). In recipients of SOT and patients with liver cirrhosis, SAVR is associated with greater short-term mortality, adverse events, and healthcare burden than is TAVR. TAVR is a relatively safer alternative to SAVR in these patient populations, although further studies are warranted to compare the long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Cirrosis Hepática , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Anciano , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Trasplante de Órganos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Despite advances in treatment and care quality for patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF), minimal improvement in mortality has been observed after HF hospitalization since 2010. Objective: To evaluate trends in mortality rates across specific intervals after hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study evaluated a random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with incident HF hospitalization from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from February 2023 to May 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unadjusted mortality rates were calculated by dividing the number of all-cause deaths by the number of patients with incident HF hospitalization for the following periods: in-hospital, 30 days (0-30 days after hospital discharge), short term (31 days to 1 year after discharge), intermediate term (1-2 years after discharge), and long term (2-3 years after discharge). Each period was considered separately (ie, patients who died during one period were not counted in subsequent periods). Annual unadjusted and risk-adjusted mortality ratios were calculated (using logistic regression to account for differences in patient characteristics), defined as observed mortality divided by expected mortality based on 2008 rates. Results: A total of 1â¯256â¯041 patients (mean [SD] age, 83.0 [7.6] years; 56.0% female; 86.0% White) were hospitalized with incident HF. There was a substantial decrease in the mortality ratio for the in-hospital period (unadjusted ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.77; risk-adjusted ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76). For subsequent periods, mortality ratios increased through 2013 and then decreased through 2018, resulting in no reductions in unadjusted postdischarge mortality during the full study period (30-day mortality ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82-1.06; short-term mortality ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87-1.17; intermediate-term mortality ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.19; and long-term mortality ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.16) and small reductions in risk-adjusted postdischarge mortality during the full study period (30-day mortality ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.90; short-term mortality ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.94-0.95; intermediate-term mortality ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95; and long-term mortality ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, there was a substantial decrease in in-hospital mortality for patients hospitalized with incident HF from 2008 to 2018, but little to no reduction in mortality for subsequent periods up to 3 years after hospitalization. These results suggest opportunities to improve longitudinal outpatient care for patients with HF after hospital discharge.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hospitalización , Medicare , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/tendencias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse hospital case fatality and mortality related to Chagas disease (CD) in Brazil, 2000-2019. METHOD: This is a mixed ecological study with spatial and temporal trends, based on national population data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health - hospital admissions (HA) and death certificates (DC). Records with CD as a primary or secondary cause of death in HA and/or as an underlying or associated cause of death in DC were evaluated. Temporal trends were analysed by Joinpoint regression and the spatial distribution of age- and gender-adjusted rates, spatial moving averages, and standardized morbidity ratios. RESULTS: There were a total of 4,376 HA due to CD resulting in death in Brazil, with a hospital case fatality rate of 0.11/100,000 inhabitants. The Southeast region had the highest rate (63.9%, n = 2,796; 0.17/100,000 inhabitants). The general trend for this indicator in Brazil is upwards (average annual percentage change [AAPC] 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3 to 9.9), with increases in the North, Northeast and Southeast regions. During the same period 122,275 deaths from CD were registered in DC, with a mortality rate of 3.14/100,000 inhabitants. The highest risk of CD-related death was found among men (relative risk [RR] 1.27) and Afro-Brazilians (RR 1.63). There was a downward trend in CD mortality in the country (AAPC - 0.7%, 95%CI -0.9 to -0.5), with an increase in the Northeast region (AAPC 1.1%, 95%CI 0.6 to 1.6). Municipalities with a very high Brazilian Deprivation Index tended to show an increase in mortality (AAPC 2.1%, 95%CI 1.6 to 2.7), while the others showed a decrease. CONCLUSION: Hospital case fatality and mortality due to CD are a relevant public health problem in Brazil. Differences related to gender, ethnicity, and social vulnerability reinforce the need for comprehensive care, and to ensure equity in access to health in the country. Municipalities, states, and regions with indicators that reveal higher morbidity and mortality need to be prioritized.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Chagas , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Chagas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Adolescente , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Análisis Espacio-Temporal , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of race on in-hospital outcomes of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy using the National Inpatient Sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from the National Inpatient Sample database 2006 to 2018. We focused on Takotsubo cardiomyopathy hospitalizations, excluding those with acute coronary syndrome as the primary diagnosis. Two study groups consisted of White patients or Black patients. Univariate and multivariable logistic models evaluated race's effect on death, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, length of stay, while adjusting for potential confounders. The Bayesian model averaging technique was used to further elucidate the factors influencing death within each racial group. Significant differences were observed between the 2 racial groups. Black patients presented at a younger age, had a higher proportion of men, a higher burden of comorbidities, and a lower median household income compared with their White counterparts. In the univariate model, the Black cohort showed an increased risk of cardiac arrest (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.15-1.82]). However, the difference did not reach statistical significance in the multivariable model. Black patients also had a significantly longer hospital stay in both the univariate model (risk ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.22-1.31]) and the multivariable model (risk ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]). No significant difference in all-cause death was observed between the racial groups. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome differences between 2 racial groups in our study are likely influenced by racial disparities in demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Individualized care based on racial group needs is crucial in clinical practice.