Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0213929, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30870506

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are concerning adverse events resulting from cancer treatment, and current guidelines recommend the use of neurokinin-1-selective antagonists, such as fosaprepitant, in highly emetogenic schemes. However, the implementation of this strategy may be limited by the cost of treatment. GSTP1 c.313A>G genotype was recently described as a predictor of vomiting related to high-dose cisplatin. We hypothesized that the inclusion of routine GSTP1 c.313A>G screening may be promising in financial terms, in contrast to the wide-spread use of fosaprepitant. METHODS: A cost-minimization analysis was planned to compare GSTP1 c.313A>G genotyping versus overall fosaprepitant implementation for patients with head and neck cancer under chemoradiation therapy with high-dose cisplatin. A decision analytic tree was designed, and conditional probabilities were calculated under Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations using the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The observed data included patients under treatment without fosaprepitant, while priors were derived from published studies. RESULTS: To introduce screening with real-time polymerase chain reaction, an initial investment of U$ 39,379.97 would be required, with an amortization cost of U$ 7,272.97 per year. The mean cost of standard therapy with fosaprepitant is U$ 243.24 per patient, and although the initial cost of routine genotyping is higher, there is a tendency of progressive minimization at a threshold of 155 patients (Credible interval-CI: 119 to 216), provided more than one sample is incorporated for simultaneous analysis. A resulting reduction of 35.83% (CI: 30.31 to 41.74%) in fosaprepitant expenditures is then expected with the implementation of GSTP1 c.313A>G genotyping. CONCLUSION: GSTP1 c.313A>G genotyping may reduce the use of preventive support for chemotherapy induced nausea and lower the overall cost of treatment. Despite the results of this simulation, randomized, interventional studies are required to control for known and unknown confounders as well as unexpected expenses.


Asunto(s)
Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Gutatión-S-Transferasa pi/genética , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/prevención & control , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/prevención & control , Algoritmos , Antieméticos/economía , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Teorema de Bayes , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Simulación por Computador , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Árboles de Decisión , Costos de los Medicamentos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Método de Montecarlo , Morfolinas/economía , Morfolinas/uso terapéutico , Náusea/genética , Antagonistas del Receptor de Neuroquinina-1/economía , Antagonistas del Receptor de Neuroquinina-1/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/economía , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/economía , Vómitos/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA