Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(9): 627, 2024 Sep 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39276205
2.
Blood Cancer J ; 13(1): 153, 2023 09 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752128

RESUMEN

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor to active multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this study was to report clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with SMM stratified based on their risk of progression to MM using the Mayo 20/2/20 criteria. Data were leveraged from the Czech Myeloma Group Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG). Key outcomes included progression-free survival from SMM diagnosis to active MM diagnosis or death (PFS), progression-free survival from SMM diagnosis to progression on first line (1 L) MM treatment or death (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Of 498 patients, 174 (34.9%) were classified as high risk and 324 (65.1%) as non-high risk. Median follow-up was approximately 65 months. During follow-up, more patients in the high-risk vs non-high-risk group received 1 L MM treatment (76.4% vs 46.6%, p < 0.001). PFS, PFS2, and OS were significantly shorter in high-risk vs non-high-risk patients (13.2 vs 56.6 months, p < 0.001; 49.9 vs 84.9 months, p < 0.001; 93.2 vs 131.1 months, p = 0.012, respectively). The results of this study add to the growing body of evidence that patients with high-risk vs non-high-risk SMM have significantly worse outcomes, including OS.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/terapia , República Checa/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Sistema de Registros
3.
Cancer J ; 27(3): 185-189, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34549905

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Smoldering multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by excess marrow involvement and immunoglobulin production. It is the precursor of MM, differing by the lack of end-organ damage. Smoldering MM encompasses a heterogeneous group of patients, with a median risk of progression to active disease of 50% in the first 5 years. Until recently, the standard of care would dictate observation off therapy until the development of end-organ damage. The recognition of high-risk and ultrahigh-risk subgroups of smoldering MM, with more likely evolution to MM, has led to earlier initiation of therapy in the disease course. Ongoing studies to define the ideal timing and patient population are underway, as well as identification of which agents would be of greatest benefit, as the armamentarium for MM continues to grow.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/etiología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/terapia
4.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 14(2): 149-153, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33430658

RESUMEN

Introduction: Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a clonal plasma cell (PC) disorder considered a prelude to MM due to its greater malignant potential compared to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Despite tectonic changes in the SMM landscape that occurred since it was first distinguished four decades ago, SMM continues to represent a complex and controversial entity causing a great deal of diagnostic and management turmoil.Areas covered: Author addresses increasingly complicated, ambiguous, as well as some overlooked and misjudged aspects of SMM such as the disease identity, relationship to its counterparts, MGUS and overt MM, its niche in the modern classification of monoclonal gammopathies and management. The PubMed search (1980-2020) was conducted and the current NCCN guidelines reviewed in reference to the diagnosis and treatment of smoldering multiple myeloma.Expert opinion: A plethora of clinical and biological evidence points to SMM as a source of the ongoing and expanding uncertainty of this condition and calls into question its authenticity as a discrete entity. Until comprehensive testing can predict the progression of pre-myeloma conditions with the utmost precision, attempts at preemptive treatments will fail to answer the basic question of who will benefit from the early treatment and who will not.


Asunto(s)
Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada , Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente , Recolección de Datos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/diagnóstico , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/epidemiología , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/etiología
5.
Leukemia ; 35(1): 18-30, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778736

RESUMEN

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is incorporated in an increasing number of multiple myeloma (MM) clinical trials as a correlative analysis, an endpoint or even as a determinant of subsequent therapy. There is substantial heterogeneity across clinical trials in how MRD is assessed and reported, creating challenges for data interpretation and for the design of subsequent studies. We convened an international panel of MM investigators to harmonize how MRD should be assessed and reported in MM clinical trials. The panel provides consensus on which MM trials should include MRD, the recommended time points for MRD assessment, and expected analytical validation for MRD assays. We subsequently outlined parameters for reporting MRD results implementing the intention-to-treat principle. The panel provides guidance regarding the incorporation of newer peripheral blood-based and imaging-based approaches to detection of residual disease. Recommendations are summarized in 13 consensus statements that should be followed by sponsors, investigators, editors, and reviewers engaged in designing, performing, and interpreting MM trials.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Residual/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Sensibilidad Colateral al uso de Fármacos , Salud Global , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/normas , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Vigilancia de la Población , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/patología , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(12): 1720-1729, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347744

RESUMEN

The presence of monoclonal proteins is common, with a prevalence in the United States around 5% that increases with age. Although most patients are asymptomatic, most cases are caused by a clonal plasma cell disorder. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic precursor conditions with variable risk of progression to multiple myeloma. In recent years, significant progress has been made to better understand the factors that lead to the development of symptoms and progression to myeloma. This review summarizes the current diagnosis treatment guidelines for MGUS and SMM and highlights recent advances that underscore a shifting paradigm in the evaluation and management of plasma cell precursor conditions.


Asunto(s)
Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada , Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/diagnóstico , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/epidemiología , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/terapia
9.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 12(5): 345-354, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907176

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group determined that patients with ultra-high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) should be considered for treatment as per patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM), despite not having CRAB (hyperCalcemia, Renal insufficiency, Anemia, Bone disease) symptoms. Current research is elucidating whether patients with high-risk, and even intermediate-risk, SMM could benefit from early therapeutic strategies aimed at delaying progression to active MM and prolonging survival. Areas covered: The authors conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed to identify a series of patients with SMM in which prognostic and predictive factors for progression were investigated, plus the main clinical trials in SMM. Additionally, a search of active clinical trials in SMM was conducted at ClinicalTrials.gov. Expert opinion: Patients with high-risk SMM can benefit from active treatment strategies, which may prolong survival and, perhaps, provide a possible path to cure. Enabled by the limited toxicity of new drugs investigated in MM, this approach, together with consolidation with autologous transplantation, is under investigation by American and European groups. In patients with high-risk SMM who are not candidates for transplantation, combinations of oral drugs may prolong time to progression. In the near future, these approaches may be endorsed by results of ongoing clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Pronóstico , Riesgo , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple Quiescente/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA